XML 30 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Note 5 - Derivative Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Aug. 02, 2014
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Text Block]

5. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS


From time to time, we enter into aluminum swap contracts to partially mitigate our exposure to changes in the cost of aluminum cans. Such financial instruments are designated and accounted for as a cash flow hedge. Accordingly, gains or losses attributable to the effective portion of the cash flow hedge are reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (“AOCI”) and reclassified into earnings through cost of sales in the period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of our cash flow hedge was immaterial. The following summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income and AOCI relative to cash flow hedges for the three months ended August 2, 2014 and July 27, 2013:


   

(In thousands)

 
   

2014

   

2013

 

Recognized in AOCI:

               

Gain (loss) before income taxes

  $ 605     $ (1,012 )

Less income tax provision (benefit)

    224       (376 )

Net

    381       (636 )

Reclassified from AOCI to cost of sales:

               

Gain (loss) before income taxes

    15       (566 )

Less income tax provision (benefit)

    5       (210 )

Net

    10       (356 )

Net change to AOCI

  $ 371     $ (280 )

As of August 2, 2014, the notional amount of our outstanding aluminum swap contracts was $6.5 million and, assuming no change in the commodity prices, $595,000 of unrealized gain before tax will be reclassified from AOCI and recognized in earnings over the next nine months. See Note 1.


As of August 2, 2014 and May 3, 2014, the fair value of the derivative asset was $595,000 and $5,000, respectively, which was included in prepaid and other assets. Such valuation does not entail a significant amount of judgment and the inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement are Level 2 as defined by the fair value hierarchy as they are observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.