XML 113 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Intangible Assets and Goodwill Intangible Assets and Goodwill (Notes)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The Company accounts for acquisitions using purchase accounting with the results of operations for each acquiree included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period subsequent to the date of acquisition. The pro forma effects of the acquisitions completed in 2012, 2011, and 2010 were not significant individually or in the aggregate. The Company did not have any significant acquisitions during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
Intangible Assets
Amortized intangible assets were comprised of the following: 
 
2012
 
2011
December 31,
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Completed technology
$
657

 
$
632

 
$
635

 
$
627

Patents
276

 
276

 
276

 
276

Customer-related
201

 
125

 
137

 
103

Licensed technology
23

 
19

 
23

 
18

Other intangibles
94

 
90

 
91

 
90

 
$
1,251

 
$
1,142

 
$
1,162

 
$
1,114


Amortization expense on intangible assets, which is included within Other charges in the consolidated statements of operations, was $29 million, $200 million and $203 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The reduction in intangible amortization in 2012 is due to certain intangible assets that have fully amortized. As of December 31, 2012, future amortization expense is estimated to be $25 million in 2013, $23 million in 2014, $18 million in 2015, $18 million in 2016 and $15 million in 2017.
Amortized intangible assets, excluding goodwill, by segment are as follows: 
 
2012
 
2011
December 31,
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Government
$
53

 
$
48

 
$
53

 
$
48

Enterprise
1,198

 
1,094

 
1,109

 
1,066

 
$
1,251

 
$
1,142

 
$
1,162

 
$
1,114


Goodwill
The following table displays a rollforward of the carrying amount of goodwill by segment from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012: 
 
Government
 
Enterprise
 
Total
Company
Balances as of January 1, 2010:
 
 
 
 
 
Aggregate goodwill acquired
$
350

 
$
2,643

 
$
2,993

Accumulated impairment losses

 
(1,564
)
 
(1,564
)
Goodwill, net of impairment losses
350

 
1,079

 
1,429


 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2010:
 
 
 
 
 
Aggregate goodwill acquired
350

 
2,643

 
2,993

Accumulated impairment losses

 
(1,564
)
 
(1,564
)
Goodwill, net of impairment losses
350

 
1,079

 
1,429

Goodwill acquired

 
20

 
20

Goodwill divested

 
(21
)
 
(21
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2011:
 
 
 
 
 
Aggregate goodwill acquired/divested
350

 
2,642

 
2,992

Accumulated impairment losses

 
(1,564
)
 
(1,564
)
Goodwill, net of impairment losses
350

 
1,078

 
1,428

Goodwill acquired

 
83

 
83

Goodwill divested
(1
)
 

 
(1
)
Balance as of December 31, 2012:
 
 
 
 
 
Aggregate goodwill acquired/divested
349

 
2,725

 
3,074

Accumulated impairment losses

 
(1,564
)
 
(1,564
)
Goodwill, net of impairment losses
$
349

 
$
1,161

 
$
1,510


The Company conducts its annual assessment of goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year. The goodwill impairment assessment is performed at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. The Company has determined that the Government segment and Enterprise segment each meet the definition of a reporting unit.
The Company performed a qualitative assessment to determine whether it was more-likely-than-not that the fair value of each reporting unit was less than its carrying amount for fiscal year 2012 and fiscal year 2011. In performing this qualitative assessment the Company assessed relevant events and circumstances including macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance, changes in share price, and entity-specific events. In addition, the Company considered the fair value derived for each reporting unit in conjunction with the 2010 goodwill impairment test. The Company compared this prior fair value against the current carrying value of each reporting unit noting fair value significantly exceeded carrying value for both reporting units. The Company performed a sensitivity analysis on the fair value determined for each reporting unit in conjunction with the 2010 goodwill impairment test for changes in significant assumptions including the weighted average cost of capital used in the income approach and changes in expected cash flows. For fiscal 2012, these changes in assumptions and estimated cash flows resulted in an increase in fair value for the Government reporting unit and a slight decrease in fair value for the Enterprise reporting unit. In spite of this small decrease in estimated fair value of the Enterprise reporting unit, the reporting unit's fair value significantly exceeds its carrying value. For fiscal year 2011, these changes in assumptions and estimated cash flows resulted in an increase in fair value for each reporting unit from the 2010 fair values. As such, the Company concluded it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeds its carrying value. Therefore, the two-step goodwill impairment test was not required for fiscal 2012 or fiscal 2011.
2010
The goodwill impairment test for fiscal 2010 was performed using the two step goodwill impairment analysis. In step one, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared to its book value. Management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of these reporting units. Fair value is determined using a combination of present value techniques and quoted market prices of comparable businesses. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its book value, goodwill is not deemed to be impaired for that reporting unit, and no further testing would be necessary. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its book value, the Company performs step two. Step two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit. The difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in Step One and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill. A charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill is greater than its implied fair value.
The Company weighted the valuation of its reporting units at 75% based on the income approach and 25% based on the market-based approach consistent with prior periods. The Company believes that this weighting is appropriate because it is often difficult to find other appropriate market participants that are similar to its reporting units, and it is the Company's view that future discounted cash flows are more reflective of the value of the reporting units.
Based on the results of the 2010 annual assessment of the recoverability of goodwill, the fair values of both reporting units exceeded their book values, indicating that there was no impairment of goodwill.