XML 24 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Risk Management
9 Months Ended
Oct. 01, 2011
Risk Management [Abstract] 
Risk Management
5. Risk Management

Derivative Financial Instruments

Foreign Currency Risk

At October 1, 2011, the Company had outstanding foreign exchange contracts with notional amounts totaling $606 million, compared to $1.5 billion outstanding at December 31, 2010. The decrease in outstanding contracts is primarily related to the Distribution of Motorola Mobility. Management believes that these financial instruments should not subject the Company to undue risk due to foreign exchange movements because gains and losses on these contracts should generally offset losses and gains on the underlying assets, liabilities and transactions, except for the ineffective portion of the instruments, which are charged to Other within Other income (expense) in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The following table shows the five largest net notional amounts of the positions to buy or sell foreign currency as of October 1, 2011 and the corresponding positions as of December 31, 2010:

 

     Notional Amount  
Net Buy (Sell) by Currency    October 1,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 

Chinese Renminbi

     $(377)         $(423)   

Brazilian Real

     (47)         (43)   

Japanese Yen

     38         40   

Israeli Shekel

     32         (5)   

British Pound

     27         187   

Interest Rate Risk

At October 1, 2011, the Company had $2.1 billion of long-term debt, including the current portion of long-term debt, which is primarily priced at long-term, fixed interest rates.

As part of its liability management program, one of the Company's European subsidiaries has outstanding interest rate agreements ("Interest Agreements") relating to Euro-denominated loans. The interest on the Euro-denominated loans is variable. The Interest Agreements change the characteristics of interest payments from variable to maximum fixed-rate payments. The Interest Agreements are not accounted for as a part of a hedging relationship and, accordingly, the changes in the fair value of the Interest Agreements are included in Other income (expense) in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the Interest Agreements was in a liability position of $3 million at both October 1, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Counterparty Risk

The use of derivative financial instruments exposes the Company to counterparty credit risk in the event of non-performance by counterparties. However, the Company's risk is limited to the fair value of the instruments when the derivative is in an asset position. The Company actively monitors its exposure to credit risk. As of October 1, 2011, all of the counterparties have investment grade credit ratings. The Company is not exposed to material credit risk with any single counterparty. As of October 1, 2011, the Company was exposed to an aggregate credit risk of approximately $5 million with all counterparties.

 

The following tables summarize the fair values and location in the condensed consolidated balance sheets of all derivative financial instruments held by the Company, including amounts held for disposition, at October 1, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

 

The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments in our condensed consolidated statements of operations, including amounts related to discontinued operations, for the three and nine months ended October 1, 2011 and October 2, 2010:

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company's financial instruments include cash equivalents, Sigma Fund investments, short-term investments, accounts receivable, long-term receivables, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, derivative financial instruments and other financing commitments. The Company's Sigma Fund, available-for-sale investment portfolios and derivative financial instruments are recorded in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value.

Using quoted market prices and market interest rates, the Company determined that the fair value of long-term debt at October 1, 2011 was $2.2 billion, compared to a face value of $2.1 billion. Since considerable judgment is required in interpreting market information, the fair value of the long-term debt is not necessarily indicative of the amount which could be realized in a current market exchange.

All other financial instruments are carried at cost, which is not materially different than the instruments' fair values.