Form 10-K

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 30, 2011 (based on the closing sale price of $12.03 of the Registrant’s Common Stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on such date) was approximately $4,179,174,000.

Number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock at January 31, 2012:

Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed for its 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

Masco Corporation manufactures, distributes and installs home improvement and building products, with emphasis on brand-name consumer products and services holding leadership positions in their markets. We are among the largest manufacturers in North America of a number of home improvement and building products, including faucets, cabinets, architectural coatings and windows, and we are one of the largest installers of insulation for the new home construction market. We provide broad product offerings in a variety of styles and price points and distribute products through multiple channels, including directly to homebuilders and wholesale and retail channels. Approximately 76 percent of our 2011 sales were generated by our North American operations.

In 2011, we experienced increased commodity costs while the economy continued to experience declining home values, lack of job creation and depressed consumer confidence, hindering a housing recovery, all of which impacted our performance. Notwithstanding this challenging environment, we continued to take actions designed to increase our market share in our major product categories, strengthen our brands, invest in product innovation and introduce new products. We have done this while continuing to rationalize our business operations and manage our cost structure. We believe our strategy has improved our business execution and has positioned us well for a recovery in our markets.

We have taken many actions to increase our market share and strengthen our brands and businesses. We are gaining share in the U.S. with our DELTA^®, PEERLESS^®, BRIZO^®, HOT SPRING^® and CALDERA^® brands. We are also extending the Delta and Peerless brands to additional product categories, including tub and shower bathing systems and bath hardware, and are pursuing international opportunities for these brands. In 2011, we achieved year-over-year overall share gains in our Installation and Other Services segment and we also completed the implementation of a new Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) system in this segment. Behr increased its brand share across all DIY architectural coatings categories, and is also pursuing international opportunities. Milgard Manufacturing continued to gain share in the western United States, and the U.K. Window Group is gaining share in its markets in the United Kingdom.

We are focused on enhancing customer experience through new product development and product innovation. In 2011, Delta Faucet Company launched its innovative TOUCH₂O^® technology for lavatory faucets. Behr introduced a new low-VOC formula in its core PREMIUM PLUS^® paint line and also launched the KILZ^® PRO-X™ coatings line program at The Home Depot. Masco Cabinetry introduced a countertop product for the kitchen and an integrated bathroom vanity countertop solution. Arrow Fastener has introduced several new products to enhance their core product line including the T50 ELITE™ tool line, which is gaining share with domestic and international retailers.

We believe our commitment to developing innovative products and building our brands is demonstrated by the recognition we received in 2011. KraftMaid cabinetry ranked “Highest in Customer Satisfaction with Cabinets” in the J.D. Power and Associates 2011 U.S. Kitchen Cabinet Satisfaction Study^SM. Delta Faucet was named WaterSense^® Partner of the Year by the Environmental Protection Agency in recognition of its ongoing commitment to promoting advancements in water efficiency. Hansgrohe again received the prestigious Product Design Award from the Federal Republic of Germany. Behr was recognized by The Home Depot as “2011 Partner of the Year Department 24 – Paint” in the U.S. and in Canada, and Behr products again achieved #1 rankings in a leading consumer study. The Kilz brand ranked highest among paint brands for the second year in a row based on a 2011 Harris poll. MILGARD^® ESSENCE SERIES^® windows received the 2011 Crystal Achievement Award for Most Innovative New Window for a Large Manufacturer from Window & Door, a trade magazine. The MILGARD^® TUSCANY^® SERIES windows and doors with the SMARTTOUCH^® technology was named winner of the 2011 Smart Choice Award by the 50+ Housing Council, a group

focused on the needs of the aging population in Southern California. Builder, a leading magazine for the residential construction industry, named Milgard Windows and Doors as the Brand Leader in Overall Vinyl Quality in its 2012 Brand Use Study, marking the seventh time Milgard products have been recognized. Lastly, the HOT SPRING ARIA^® spa received the “Best Buy” distinction from Consumers Digest.

Since the economic downturn, we have taken significant actions designed to rationalize our business operations, manage our cost structure and improve our business processes. We have successfully managed our cash position, resulting in approximately $1.7 billion of cash at December 31, 2011. Over the last several years, we have closed 28 facilities and reduced headcount by over 30,000, enabling us to achieve a significant reduction in our fixed costs. We have improved our global supply chain by leveraging our size to realize purchasing cost savings, simplify the purchasing process, and coordinate logistical operations. At several of our businesses, we have implemented new ERP systems to improve the operations of our businesses, including customer service and inventory management and reduce costs. We are also implementing lean principles and production process studies to reduce production costs and improve efficiencies. Our Retail and Builder Cabinet businesses have been integrated, achieving profit and process improvements as a result of integration savings, lean and sourcing activities and spending reductions.

In 2011, we took additional actions designed to manage our costs, including additional plant closures and divestitures, further reducing our headcount. We also commenced the integration of our WELLHOME^® business into our Masco Contractor Services (“MCS”) group to enhance MCS’s sales and marketing capability and further expand our retrofit insulation business. Finally, we completed the common architecture program for the MERILLAT^® and QUALITY CABINETS^TM brands at Masco Cabinetry and completed the exit of our ready-to-assemble product line in North America.

We believe that our actions have managed our businesses successfully through the economic crisis and subsequent recession of recent years. We also believe that our actions have strengthened our businesses and that we are ready to meet the economic challenges that will come with growth out of the recession in all of our markets.

We report our financial results in five business segments aggregated by similarity in products and services. The following table sets forth the contribution of our segments to net sales and operating (loss) profit for the three years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009. Additional financial information concerning our operations by segment and by geographic regions, as well as general corporate expense, net, as of and for the three years ended December 31, 2011, is set forth in Note O to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report.

All of our operating segments, except the Plumbing Products segment, normally experience stronger sales during the second and third calendar quarters, corresponding with the peak season for new home construction and repair and remodel activity.

In North America, we manufacture and sell value-priced, stock and semi-custom assembled cabinetry for kitchen, bath, storage, home office and home entertainment applications in a broad range of styles and price points to address consumer preferences. We have also expanded our product offerings in this segment to include the manufacture and sale of kitchen countertops, as well as an integrated bathroom vanity and countertop solution. In Europe, we manufacture and sell assembled and ready-to-assemble kitchen, bath, storage, home office and home entertainment cabinetry. These products are sold in the United States and in Europe under a number of trademarks including KRAFTMAID^®, TVILUM^® and WOODGATE^® primarily to dealers and home centers, and under the MERILLAT^®, MOORES™ and QUALITY CABINETS™ brands primarily to distributors and homebuilders for both the home improvement and new home construction markets. Cabinet sales are significantly affected by levels of activity in both new home construction and retail consumer spending, particularly spending for major kitchen and bathroom renovation projects. A significant portion of our sales for the home improvement market are made through home center retailers.

New home construction has declined over 70 percent during the last six years, and this segment has been particularly affected by this downturn. This segment has also been negatively affected by a downturn in the repair and remodel market, particularly by consumers deferring expenditures for big-ticket items. In response, we have closed several manufacturing plants in this segment, and in 2011 we idled two additional facilities and completed the exit of our North American ready-to-assemble cabinet product line. Additionally, we continue to be focused on improving cabinet production efficiencies at lower volumes. We completed the common architecture platform for our MERILLAT^® and QUALITY CABINETS™ brands in 2011, which we believe will enhance our manufacturing flexibility. Lastly, we have completed the integration of our Builder Cabinet Group and Retail Cabinet Group to form Masco Cabinetry, and we are beginning to realize cost savings from the integration.

The cabinet manufacturing industry in the United States and Europe is highly competitive, with several large competitors and numerous local and regional competitors. In 2011, we experienced greater promotional pricing activity in this segment, which impacts the segment’s results of operations. In addition to price, we believe that competition in this industry is based largely on product quality, responsiveness to customer needs, product features and selection. Our significant North American competitors include American Woodmark Corporation and Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc.

The businesses in our Plumbing Products segment sell a wide variety of faucet and showering devices that are manufactured by or for us. The majority of our plumbing products are sold in North America and Europe under the brand names DELTA^®, PEERLESS^®, HANSGROHE^®, AXOR^®, BRIZO^®, BRASSTECH^®, BRISTAN^tm, GINGER^®, NEWPORT BRASS^®, ALSONS^® and PLUMB SHOP^®. Our products include single-handle and double-handle faucets, showerheads, handheld showers and valves, which are sold to major retail accounts and to wholesalers and distributors who, in turn, sell our products to plumbers, building contractors, remodelers, smaller retailers and others.

We believe that our plumbing products are among the leaders in sales in the North American and European markets, with American Standard, Kohler, Moen and Pfister as major brand competitors. We also have several European competitors, primarily in Germany, including Friedrich Grohe. We face significant competition from private label products (including house brands sold by certain of our customers). Many of the faucet and showering products with which our products compete are manufactured in Asia. The businesses in our Plumbing Products segment source products from Asia and manufacture products in the United States, Europe and Asia.

Other plumbing products manufactured and sold by us include products branded as AQUA GLASS^®, MIROLIN^®, AMERICAN SHOWER & BATH™ and Innovex^® acrylic and gelcoat tub and shower systems, bath and shower enclosure units, shower trays and laundry tubs, which are sold primarily to wholesale plumbing distributors and home center retailers for the North American home improvement and new home construction markets. Our spas are manufactured and sold under HOT SPRING^®, CALDERA^® and other trademarks directly to independent dealers. Major competitors include Kohler, Lasco, Maax and Jacuzzi. We sell HÜPPE^® shower enclosures through wholesale channels primarily in Western Europe. HERITAGE™ ceramic and acrylic bath fixtures and faucets are principally sold in the United Kingdom directly to selected retailers.

Also included in the Plumbing Products segment are brass and copper plumbing system components and other plumbing specialties, which are sold to plumbing, heating and hardware wholesalers and to home center retailers, hardware stores, building supply outlets and other mass merchandisers. These products are marketed in North America for the wholesale trade under the BRASSCRAFT^® and BRASSTECH^® trademarks and for the “do-it-yourself” market under the MASTER PLUMBER^® and PLUMB SHOP^® trademarks, and are also sold under private label.

In addition to price, we believe that competition in our Plumbing Products markets is based largely on brand reputation, product quality, product innovation and features, and breadth of product offering.

A substantial portion of our plumbing products contain brass, the major components of which are copper and zinc. We have encountered price volatility for brass, brass components and any components containing copper and zinc; therefore, we have implemented a hedging strategy to minimize the impact of this volatility. Legislation enacted in California, Vermont and Maryland mandates new standards for acceptable lead content in plumbing products sold in those states. Federal legislation mandating a national standard for lead content in plumbing products will become effective in January 2014. Faucet and water supply valve manufacturers, including our plumbing product companies, will be required to obtain adequate supplies of lead-free brass or suitable alternative materials for continued production of faucets and certain of our plumbing products. Over the

last several years, our Delta Faucet business introduced the DIAMOND™ SEAL TECHNOLOGY, which reduces the number of potential leak points in a faucet, simplifies installation and satisfies legislation regarding the acceptable lead content in plumbing products.

Our Installation and Other Services segment sells installed building products and distributes building products primarily to the new home construction market, and, to a lesser extent, the retrofit and commercial construction markets, throughout the United States. In addition to insulation, we sell installed gutters, after-paint products, fireplaces and garage doors. The installation and distribution of insulation comprised approximately nine percent of our consolidated net sales in 2011, 2010 and 2009. Installed building products are supplied primarily to custom and production homebuilders by our network of branches located across the United States. Distributed products include insulation, insulation accessories, gutters, fireplaces and roofing. Distributed products are sold primarily to contractors and dealers (including lumber yards) from distribution centers in various parts of the United States.

In order to respond to the significant decrease in demand in the new home construction industry over the past several years, we have implemented various cost savings initiatives, including the consolidation and closure of approximately 110 branch locations. This rationalization has been accomplished while maintaining our strategic presence in most of the top 100 Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the United States. In addition, we have de-emphasized the installation of certain non-insulation building products that are not core to our service offering, including windows and paint. In 2011, we announced the decision to divest four non-core businesses in this segment that offered commercial drywall installation, millwork and framing services. We also completed the implementation of an ERP system, which we anticipate will enable us to achieve future efficiencies through the automation of manual processes and to provide superior customer service to our customers.

Also in response to the depressed new home construction market, we have expanded our ability to serve the residential retrofit and light commercial markets. Within the Installation and Other Services segment, we have several initiatives related to improved residential energy efficiency, including retrofit installation services (primarily insulation) delivered directly to homeowners, as well as through retailers and dealer outlets.

In addition to price, we believe that competition in this industry is based largely on customer service and the quality of installation service. We believe that we are the largest national provider of installed insulation in the new home construction industry in the United States. Our competitors include several regional contractors, as well as numerous local contractors and lumber yards. We believe that our capabilities and financial resources are substantial compared to regional and local contractors.

We produce architectural coatings including paints, primers, specialty paint products, stains and waterproofing products. The products are sold in the United States, Canada, China, Mexico and South America under the brand names BEHR^®, KILZ^® and BEHR EXPRESSIONS^® to “do-it-yourself” and professional customers through home centers, paint stores and other retailers. Net sales of architectural coatings comprised approximately 20 percent of our consolidated net sales in 2011, 2010 and 2009. Competitors in the architectural coatings market include large national and international brands such as Benjamin Moore, Glidden, Olympic, Sherwin-Williams, Valspar and Zinsser, as well as many regional and other national brands. In addition to price, we believe that competition in this industry is based largely on product quality, technology and product innovation, customer service and brand reputation. Recently our competitors have begun to offer combined paint and primer products similar to Behr’s PREMIUM PLUS ULTRA paint, which we introduced in 2009.

Our BEHR products are sold through The Home Depot, the segment’s and our largest customer. The paint departments at The Home Depot stores include the Behr color center and computer kiosk with the COLOR SMART BY BEHR^® computerized color-matching system that enables consumers to select and coordinate their paint-color selection. The loss of this segment’s sales to The Home Depot would have a material adverse effect on this segment’s business and on our consolidated business as a whole.

Titanium dioxide is a major ingredient in the manufacture of paint. The industry continues to experience cost increases for titanium dioxide as a result of surges in global demand and production capacity limitations, which has impacted our operating results in this segment. Petroleum products are also used in the manufacture of architectural coatings. Significant increases in the cost of crude oil and natural gas lead to higher raw material costs (e.g., for resins, solvents and packaging, as well as titanium dioxide), which can adversely affect the segment’s results of operations.

Our Decorative Architectural Products segment also includes LIBERTY^® and BRAINERD^® branded cabinet, door, window and other hardware, which is manufactured for us and sold to home centers, other retailers, original equipment manufacturers and wholesale markets. Key competitors in North America include Amerock, Top Knobs, Direct Import, Hickory Hardware and Stanley Black & Decker. Decorative bath hardware and shower accessories are sold under the brand names DELTA^®, FRANKLIN BRASS^® and DECOR BATHWARE^® to distributors, home centers and other retailers. Competitors include Moen and Gatco.

We manufacture and sell vinyl, fiberglass and aluminum windows and patio doors under the MILGARD^® brand name to the home improvement and new home construction markets, principally in the western United States. MILGARD products are sold primarily through dealers and, to a lesser extent, directly to production and custom homebuilders and through lumber yards and home centers. In late 2010, Milgard Manufacturing introduced the ESSENCE SERIES™ wood windows and doors, which combines a wood interior with a fiberglass exterior. This segment’s competitors in North America include national brands, such as Jeld-Wen, Simonton, Pella and Andersen, and numerous regional brands. In 2011, we closed four plants in this segment.

In the United Kingdom, we manufacture and sell windows, related products and components under several brand names including GRIFFIN™, CAMBRIAN™, PREMIER™ and DURAFLEX™. Sales are primarily through dealers and wholesalers to the repair and remodeling markets, although our DURAFLEX products are also sold to other window fabricators. United Kingdom competitors include many small and mid-sized firms and a few large, vertically integrated competitors. In addition to price, we believe that competition in this industry is based largely on customer service and product quality.

We manufacture and sell a complete line of manual and electric staple gun tackers, staples and other fastening tools under the brand names ARROW^® and POWERSHOT^®. We sell these products through various distribution channels including home centers and other retailers and wholesalers. Our principal North American competitor in this product line is Stanley Black & Decker.

Our website is www.masco.com. Our periodic reports and all amendments to those reports required to be filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. This Report is being posted on our website concurrently with its filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Material contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Report.

There are a number of business risks and uncertainties that could affect our business. These risks and uncertainties could cause our actual results to differ from past performance or expected results. We consider the following risks and uncertainties to be most relevant to our specific business activities. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently believe to be immaterial, also may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A significant portion of our business relies on home improvement and new home construction activity levels, both of which are experiencing a prolonged and substantial downturn.

A significant portion of our business relies on home improvement (including repair and remodel) and new home construction activity levels, principally in North America and Europe. The current economic decline has adversely affected our home improvement businesses. Continued low levels of consumer confidence, high levels of unemployment, and the downward pressure on home prices have limited consumers’ discretionary spending and have made consumers reluctant to make additional investments in existing homes, including large kitchen and bath remodeling projects. The increasing number of households with negative equity in their homes, and more conservative residential lending practices for home equity loans that are often used to finance repairs and remodeling, are limiting the ability of consumers to finance home improvements. Additionally, sales of existing homes, which significantly impact our home improvement business, have decreased significantly in the past few years.

New home construction, which is cyclical in nature, is experiencing a prolonged and substantial downturn marked by continued softness in the demand for new homes, an oversupply of existing

homes on the market and more stringent standards for homebuyers seeking financing. The oversupply of existing homes held for sale is exacerbated by slower household formation growth rates, the significant number of short sales and home mortgage foreclosures, as well as uncertainties in the home foreclosure process, all of which continue to contribute to the downward pressure on home prices. Further, the expiration or scaling back of homebuyer tax credits and other government programs has also negatively impacted home sales. It is uncertain when, and to what extent, these trends and factors might reverse or improve.

Although we believe that the long-term outlook for home improvement and new home construction is favorable, we cannot predict the type, timing or strength of a recovery in these areas. The large number of borrowers who remain at risk of potentially losing their homes through foreclosures or short sales, coupled with the voluntary and involuntary halts of foreclosure proceedings by lenders due to legal challenges, could prolong the downturn in home improvement and new home construction activity. Prolonged depressed activity levels in consumer spending for home improvements and new home construction will continue to adversely affect our results of operations and our financial position and may disproportionately affect our business segments that are most heavily dependent on new home construction and large consumer investments in home remodeling projects.

The prolonged economic downturn could result in our taking additional significant non-cash charges, which may reduce our financial resources and flexibility and could negatively affect our earnings and reduce shareholders’ equity.

We have recorded significant goodwill and other intangible assets related to prior business combinations on our balance sheet. The valuation of these assets is largely dependent upon the expectations for future performance of our businesses. In recent years, we have recorded significant non-cash impairment charges for financial investments and goodwill and other intangible assets. We have also recorded a valuation allowance related to our deferred tax assets. A further decline in the expectation of our future performance, or a further deterioration in expectations regarding the timing and the extent of the recovery of the new home construction and home improvement segments, may cause us to recognize additional non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets or other long-lived assets, which are not determinable at this time. If the value of goodwill or other intangible assets is impaired, our earnings and shareholders’ equity would be adversely affected.

Further, our credit agreement contains financial covenants we must comply with, including covenants regarding limits on our debt to total capitalization ratio. If we are required to record additional non-cash impairment charges, which would reduce our shareholders’ equity, our borrowing capacity under our credit agreement may be limited. We recently amended our credit agreement to allow for the add-back to shareholders’ equity for impairment charges we have taken. There can be no assurance that we would be able to further amend the credit agreement in the future or that alternative financing would be available on acceptable terms and at acceptable rates, or that we would be permitted to obtain alternative financing under the terms of our existing financing arrangements.

If we do not maintain strong brands, develop new products or respond to changing consumer preferences and purchasing practices, our results could be adversely affected.

Our competitive advantage is due, in part, to our ability to maintain our strong brands and to develop and introduce innovative new and improved products. We have increased our focus on investment in brand building and brand awareness, as well as new product development and product innovation. The uncertainties associated with developing and introducing new and improved products, such as gauging changing consumer preferences and successfully developing, manufacturing, marketing and selling new or improved products may impact the success of our new product introductions. If our new products do not gain widespread market acceptance, we could lose market share, which could negatively impact our operating results.

Further, the volatile and challenging economic environment of recent years has caused shifts in consumer preferences and purchasing practices and changes in the business models and strategies of our customers. For example, the size of new homes has decreased, and demand has increased for multi-family housing units such as apartments and condominiums, which are often smaller than single-family housing units. The effect of these trends has resulted in smaller kitchens and smaller and fewer bathrooms, each with fewer cabinets and faucets, as well as the use of less insulation. Such shifts, which may or may not be long-term, have altered the quantity, type and prices of products demanded by the end-consumer and our customers. Additionally, consumers are increasingly using the internet and mobile technology to research home improvement products and enhance their purchasing experience for these products. If we do not timely and effectively identify and respond to these changing consumer preferences and purchasing practices, our relationships with our customers could be harmed, the demand for our products could be reduced and our market share could be negatively affected.

Our response to the prolonged economic downturn has been to continue our focus on implementation of cost-savings initiatives, which have been costly and may not be effective.

During the current downturn in home improvement and new home construction, we have focused on cost-saving initiatives, including rationalizing our businesses, particularly the consolidation of our cabinet businesses, as well as plant closures, headcount reductions, and system implementations.

The consolidation of our cabinet businesses has involved the integration of multiple manufacturing processes and information technology platforms, which has been complex, time-consuming and expensive. If we cannot successfully implement this consolidation or our other cost-savings initiatives, or if it becomes more expensive to make future cost-savings changes, we may not fully achieve the anticipated benefits from these initiatives. Further, if we do not effectively balance our focus on cost savings with the need to maintain a strong sales presence for our brands, we could lose market share. In the future, we will need to continually evaluate our productivity to assess opportunities to reduce costs, and we may incur additional costs and charges relating to further cost-savings initiatives. However, gaining additional efficiencies may become increasingly difficult over time. If the eventual recovery of our markets is fast-paced and robust, we may not be able to replace our reduced manufacturing and installation capacity in a timely fashion and our ability to respond to increased demand could be limited, which could result in lost market share and, ultimately, could negatively impact our operating results.

We rely on key customers and may encounter conflicts within and between our distribution channels.

The size and importance of individual customers to our businesses has increased as customers in our major distribution channels have consolidated or exited the business. Larger customers can make significant changes in their volume of purchases and can otherwise significantly affect the prices we receive for our products and services, our costs of doing business with them and the terms and conditions on which we do business. Sales of our home improvement and building products to home centers are substantial. In 2011, sales to our largest customer, The Home Depot, were $2.0 billion (approximately 27 percent of our consolidated net sales). Lowe’s is our second largest customer. In 2011, our sales to Lowe’s were less than ten percent of our consolidated net sales. Although homebuilders, dealers and other retailers represent other channels of distribution for our products and services, the loss of a substantial portion of our sales to The Home Depot or the loss of our sales to Lowe’s would have a material adverse effect on our business.

As some of our customers expand their markets and their targeted customers, conflicts between our existing distribution channels have and will continue to occur. In addition, we may undermine the business relationships we have with customers who purchase our products through traditional wholesale channels as we increase the amount of business we transact directly with our customers. In

addition, our large retail customers are increasingly requesting product exclusivity, which may affect our ability to offer products to other customers and may diminish our ability to leverage economies of scale.

The major geographic markets for our products and services are highly competitive. Competition is further intensified during economic downturns. Home centers are increasing their purchases of products directly from low-cost overseas suppliers for sale as private label and house brand merchandise. Additionally, home centers, which have historically concentrated their sales efforts on retail consumers and remodelers, are increasingly turning their marketing efforts directly toward professional contractors and installers. We believe that competition in our industries is based on price, product and service quality, brand reputation, customer service and product features and innovation.

In addition to the challenges we have faced as a result of the economic downturn, our ability to maintain our competitive positions in our markets and to grow our businesses depends to a large extent upon successfully maintaining our relationships with major customers, implementing growth strategies in our existing markets and entering new geographic markets, including successful penetration of international markets, capitalizing on and strengthening our brand names, managing our cost structure, accommodating shorter life-cycles for our products and product development and innovation.

Increased commodity costs and limited availability of commodities could affect our operating results.

We buy various commodities to manufacture our products, including, among others, wood, brass (made of copper and zinc), titanium dioxide and resins. Fluctuations in the availability and prices of these commodities could increase our costs to manufacture our products. Further, increases in energy costs not only increase our production costs, but also the cost to transport our products, each of which could negatively affect our financial condition and operating results.

It has been, and likely will continue to be, difficult for us to pass on to customers cost increases to cover our increased commodity and production costs. Our existing arrangements with customers, competitive considerations and customer resistance to price increases may delay or make us unable to adjust selling prices. If we are not able to increase the prices of our products or achieve cost savings to offset increased commodity and production costs, our financial condition and operating results could be negatively impacted. If we are able to increase our selling prices, sustained price increases for our products may lead to sales declines and loss of market share, particularly if our competitors do not increase their prices. When commodity prices decline, we may receive pressure from our customers to reduce prices for our products and services.

To reduce the price volatility associated with certain anticipated commodity purchases, we use derivative instruments, including commodity futures and swaps. We may incur net substantial costs as part of our strategy to hedge against price volatility of certain commodities we purchase and we may make commitments to purchase these commodities at prices that subsequently exceed their market prices, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

We are dependent on third-party suppliers and manufacturers, and the loss of a key supplier or manufacturer could negatively affect our operating results.

Our ability to offer a wide variety of products depends on our ability to obtain an adequate supply of products and components from manufacturers and other suppliers. We rely heavily or, in certain cases, exclusively, on outside suppliers for some of our products and key components. Failure by our suppliers to provide us quality products on commercially reasonable terms, and to comply with legal requirements for business practices, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or

operating results. Although these products and components are generally obtainable in sufficient quantities from other sources, resourcing them to another supplier could take time and could involve significant costs. Accordingly, the loss of a key supplier, or a substantial decrease in the availability of products or components from our suppliers, could disrupt our business and adversely impact our operating results.

Further, we manufacture products in Asia and source products and components from third parties in Asia. The distances involved in these arrangements, together with differences in business practices, shipping and delivery requirements, the limited number of suppliers, and laws and regulations, have increased the difficulty of managing our supply chain, the complexity of our supply chain logistics and the potential for interruptions in our production scheduling. If we are unable to effectively manage our supply chain, our operating results could be negatively affected.

International political, monetary, economic and social developments affect our business.

Over 20 percent of our sales are made outside of North America (principally in Europe) and are transacted in currencies other than U.S. dollars (principally the euro and the British pound sterling). Increased international sales make up an important part of our future strategic plans. In addition, we manufacture products in Asia and source products and components from third parties in Asia. Our international business faces risks associated with changes in political, monetary, economic and social environments, labor conditions and practices, the laws, regulations and policies of foreign governments, cultural differences and differences in enforcement of contract and intellectual property rights. U.S. laws affecting activities of U.S. companies doing business abroad, including tax laws and laws regulating various business practices, also impact our international business. Our international operating results may be influenced, when compared to our North American results, in part by relative economic conditions in the European markets, including uncertainty regarding the European sovereign debt crisis, and competitive pricing pressures on certain products. The financial reporting of our consolidated operating results is affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which may present challenges in comparing operating performance from period to period and in forecasting future performance.

We have financial commitments and investments in financial assets, including assets that are not readily marketable and involve financial risk.

We continue to reduce our investment in private equity funds. Since there is no active trading market for investments in private equity funds, they are for the most part illiquid. These investments, by their nature, can also have a relatively higher degree of business risk, including financial leverage, than other financial investments. Future changes in market conditions, the future performance of the underlying investments or new information provided by private equity fund managers could affect the recorded values of such investments or the amounts realized upon liquidation. In addition, we have commitments that require us to contribute additional capital to these private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund.

We are, from time to time, involved in various claims, litigation matters and regulatory proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business and which could have a material adverse effect on us. These matters may include contract disputes, automobile liability and other personal injury claims, warranty disputes, environmental claims or proceedings, other tort claims, employment and tax matters and other proceedings and litigation, including class actions.

We are subject to product safety regulations, recalls and direct claims for product liability that can result in significant liability and, regardless of the ultimate outcome, can be costly to defend or manage. Also, we increasingly rely on other manufacturers to provide us with products or components for

products that we sell. Due to the difficulty of controlling the quality of products or components sourced from other manufacturers, we are exposed to risks relating to the quality of such products and to limitations on our recourse against such suppliers.

We have also experienced class action lawsuits in recent years predicated upon claims for antitrust violations, product liability and wage and hour issues. We have generally denied liability and have vigorously defended these cases. Due to their scope and complexity, however, these lawsuits are particularly costly to resolve and significant exposures have been alleged.

Increasingly, our homebuilder customers are subject to construction defect and home warranty claims in the ordinary course of their business. Our contractual arrangements with these customers may include our agreement to defend and indemnify them against various liabilities caused by our negligence. These claims, often asserted several years after completion of construction, can result in complex lawsuits or claims against the homebuilders and many of their subcontractors, including us, and may require us to incur defense and indemnity costs even when our products or services are not the principal basis for the claims.

Although we intend to defend all claims and litigation matters vigorously, given the inherently unpredictable nature of claims and litigation, we cannot predict with certainty the outcome or effect of any claim or litigation matter.

We maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these risks of loss resulting from claims and litigation. We may elect not to obtain insurance if we believe the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to the risks presented. The levels of insurance we maintain may not be adequate to fully cover any and all losses or liabilities. If any significant accident, judgment, claim or other event is not fully insured or indemnified against, it could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

See Note S to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report for additional information about litigation involving our businesses.

Government and industry responses to environmental and health and safety concerns could impact our capital expenditures and operating results.

We are subject to U.S. and foreign government regulations pertaining to health and safety (including protection of employees and consumers), climate disruption and environmental issues. In addition to complying with current requirements and requirements that will become effective at a future date, even more stringent requirements could be imposed on our industries in the future. Additionally, some of our products must be certified by industry organizations. Compliance with these regulations and industry standards may require us to alter our manufacturing and installation processes and our sourcing, which could adversely impact our competitive position. Further, if we do not effectively and timely comply with such regulations and industry standards, our operating results could be negatively affected.

The long-term performance of our businesses relies on our ability to attract, develop and retain talented personnel.

To be successful, we must attract, develop and retain highly qualified and talented personnel and, as we consider entering new international markets, skilled personnel familiar with these markets. We compete for employees with a broad range of employers in many different industries, including large multinational firms, and we invest significant resources in recruiting, developing, motivating and retaining them. The failure to attract, develop, motivate and retain key employees could negatively affect our competitive position and our operating results.

The table below lists our principal North American properties for segments other than Installation and Other Services.

Most of our North American facilities range from single warehouse buildings to complex manufacturing facilities. We own most of our North American manufacturing facilities, none of which are subject to significant encumbrances. A substantial number of our warehouse and distribution facilities are leased.

Our Installation and Other Services segment operates approximately 188 installation branch locations and approximately 70 distribution centers in the United States, most of which are leased.

Most of our international facilities are located in China, Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. We generally own our international manufacturing facilities, none of which are subject to significant encumbrances. A substantial number of our international warehouse and distribution facilities are leased.

Our corporate headquarters are located in Taylor, Michigan and are owned by us. We own an additional building near our corporate headquarters that is used by our corporate research and development department.

Each of our operating divisions assesses the manufacturing, distribution and other facilities needed to meet its operating requirements. Our buildings, machinery and equipment have been generally well maintained and are in good operating condition. We believe our facilities have sufficient capacity and are adequate for our production and distribution requirements.

Information regarding legal proceedings involving us is set forth in Note S to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report and is incorporated herein by reference.

The New York Stock Exchange is the principal market on which our common stock is traded. The following table indicates the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange and the cash dividends declared per common share for the periods indicated:

On January 31, 2012, there were approximately 5,350 holders of record of our common stock.

We expect that our practice of paying quarterly dividends on our common stock will continue, although the payment of future dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors.

We grant equity under our 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2011 concerning the Plan, which was approved by our stockholders. We do not have any equity compensation plans that are not approved by stockholders.

The remaining information required by this Item will be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed on or before April 29, 2012, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.

The table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of (i) the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Index (“S&P 500 Index”), (ii) The Standard & Poor’s Industrials Index (“S&P Industrials Index”) and (iii) the Standard & Poor’s Consumer Durables & Apparel Index (“S&P Consumer Durables & Apparel Index”), from December 31, 2006 through December 31, 2011, when the closing price of our common stock was $10.48. The graph assumes investments of $100 on December 31, 2006 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends.

The table below sets forth the value, as of December 31 for each of the years indicated, of a $100 investment made on December 31, 2006 in each of our common stock, the S&P 500 Index, the S&P Industrials Index and the S&P Consumer Durables & Apparel Index and includes the reinvestment of dividends.

In July 2007, our Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise. At December 31, 2011, we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 25 million shares. During 2011, we repurchased and retired two million shares of our common stock, for cash aggregating $30 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2011 grant of two million shares of long-term stock awards. We have not purchased any shares since April 2011.

The financial and business analysis below provides information which we believe is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. This financial and business analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes.

The following discussion and certain other sections of this Report contain statements reflecting our views about our future performance and constitute “forward-looking statements” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “assume,” “seek,” “appear,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “forecast” and similar references to future periods. These views involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and, accordingly, our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in such forward-looking statements. We caution you against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. In addition to the various factors included in the “Executive Level Overview,” “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” and “Outlook for the Company” sections, our future performance may be affected by our reliance on new home construction and home improvement, our reliance on key customers, the cost and availability of raw materials, shifts in consumer preferences and purchasing practices, and our ability to achieve cost savings through business rationalizations and other initiatives. These and other factors are discussed in detail in Item 1A “Risk “Factors” of this Report. Any forward-looking statement made by us in this Report speaks only as of the date on which it was made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. Unless required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

We manufacture, distribute and install home improvement and building products. These products are sold to the home improvement and new home construction markets through mass merchandisers, hardware stores, home centers, homebuilders, distributors and other outlets for consumers and contractors and direct to the consumer.

2011 Results. The following is a summary of the significant factors affecting us in 2011: Our Cabinets and Related Products segment continues to be negatively affected by softness in the new home construction market and increased competitive market conditions in the repair and remodel market. Further, the Cabinets and Related Products segment continued to incur costs and charges related to the integration of our North American cabinet manufacturers that began in 2010 and other plant closures and consolidations, including the exit of certain product lines. This segment also incurred goodwill impairment charges related to our ready-to-assemble cabinet manufacturer in Europe. Our Plumbing Products segment continues to realize increased sales volume and selling prices, offset by increased commodity costs and a less favorable product mix. The Installation and Other Services segment was positively affected by increased distribution sales, increased selling prices and increased retrofit and commercial sales, which partially offset decreases in sales volume related to the new home construction market. We also decided to divest certain operations in the Installation and Other Services segment that are not core to our long-term growth strategy; such operations have been classified as discontinued operations. The Decorative Architectural Products segment was negatively affected by lower sales volume of paints and stains due to increasingly competitive market conditions and increased commodity costs; this segment also incurred goodwill impairment charges related to the builders’ hardware business unit and rationalization costs related to the exit of a builders’ hardware product line. Our Other Specialty Products segment was negatively impacted by lower sales volume due to continuing weakness in our markets and increased business rationalization costs related to the closure of several facilities.

In 2011, we experienced increased commodity costs, and the economy continued to experience a further decline in home values, lack of job creation and depressed consumer confidence, hindering a housing recovery, all of which negatively impacted our performance. During 2011 we continued to take actions to further reduce our cost structure, including closing several branch locations in the Installation and Other Services segment, closing several manufacturing facilities related to our North American window manufacturer, closing one manufacturing facility related to our European ready-to-assemble cabinet manufacturer, one facility related to our North American cabinet manufacturer and continued to integrate our North American cabinet manufacturers. We incurred costs and charges related to these and other actions of $121 million. We believe that these actions, together with actions taken over the last several years, have positioned us well for the current environment and for the recovery in our markets.

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of any contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We regularly review our estimates and assumptions, which are based upon historical experience, as well as current economic conditions and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of certain assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.

We believe that the following critical accounting policies are affected by significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

We recognize revenue as title to products and risk of loss is transferred to customers or when services are rendered. We record revenue for unbilled services performed based upon estimates of material and labor incurred in the Installation and Other Services segment; such amounts are recorded in Receivables. We record estimated reductions to revenue for customer programs and incentive offerings, including special pricing and co-operative advertising arrangements, promotions and other volume-based incentives. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts receivable for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. In addition, we monitor our customer receivable balances and the credit worthiness of our customers on an on-going basis. During downturns in our markets, declines in the financial condition and creditworthiness of customers impact the credit risk of the receivables involved and we have incurred bad debt expense related to customer defaults. Our bad debt expense was $12 million, $18 million and $34 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

We record inventories at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with expense estimates made for obsolescence or unsaleable inventory equal to the difference between the recorded cost of inventories and their estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. On an on-going basis, we monitor these estimates and record adjustments for differences between estimates and actual experience. Historically, actual results have not significantly deviated from those determined using these estimates.

We follow accounting guidance that defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements for our financial investments and liabilities. This guidance defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” Further, it defines a fair value hierarchy, as follows: Level 1 inputs as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs as observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by market data; and Level 3 inputs as unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models or instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

If applicable, we record investments in available-for-sale securities at fair value, and unrealized gains or losses (that are deemed to be temporary) are recognized, net of tax effect, through shareholders’ equity, as a component of other comprehensive income in our consolidated balance sheet. During 2011 and 2010, we sold all of our shares of our investment in TriMas common stock for cash of $43 million and $10 million, respectively.

In the past, we have invested excess cash in auction rate securities. Auction rate securities are investment securities that have interest rates which are reset every 7, 28 or 35 days. At December 31, 2011, our investment in auction rate securities was $22 million; we have not increased our investment in auction rate securities since 2007. The fair value of auction rate securities is estimated, on a recurring basis, using a discounted cash flow model (Level 3 input). If we changed the discount rate used in the fair value estimate by 75 basis points, the value of the auction rate securities would change by approximately $1 million.

We have maintained investments in a number of private equity funds, which aggregated $86 million at December 31, 2011. We carry our investments in private equity funds and other private investments at cost. It is not practicable for us to estimate a fair value for private equity funds and other private investments because there are no quoted market prices, and sufficient information is not readily available for us to utilize a valuation model to determine the fair value for each fund. These investments are evaluated, on a non-recurring basis, for potential other-than-temporary impairment when impairment indicators are present, or when an event or change in circumstances has occurred, that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. Due to the significant unobservable inputs, the fair value measurements used to evaluate impairment are a Level 3 input.

Impairment indicators we consider include the following: whether there has been a significant deterioration in earnings performance, asset quality or business prospects; a significant adverse change in the regulatory, economic or technological environment; a significant adverse change in the general market condition or geographic area in which the investment operates; industry and sector performance; current equity and credit market conditions; and any bona fide offers to purchase the investment for less than the carrying value. We also consider specific adverse conditions related to the financial health of and business outlook for the fund, including industry and sector performance. The significant assumptions utilized in analyzing a fund for potential other-than-temporary impairment include current economic conditions, market analysis for specific funds and performance indicators in residential and commercial construction, bio-technology, health care and information technology sectors in which the applicable funds’ investments operate.

At December 31, 2011, we have investments in 17 venture capital funds, with an aggregate carrying value of $17 million. The venture capital funds invest in start-up or smaller, early-stage established businesses, principally in the information technology, bio-technology and health care sectors. At December 31, 2011, we also have investments in 22 buyout funds, with an aggregate carrying value of $69 million. The buyout funds invest in later-stage, established businesses and no buyout fund has a concentration in a particular sector.

Since there is no active trading market for these investments, they are for the most part illiquid. These investments, by their nature, can also have a relatively higher degree of business risk, including financial leverage, than other financial investments. The timing of distributions from the funds, which depends on particular events related to the underlying investments, as well as the funds’ schedules for making distributions and their needs for cash, can be difficult to predict. As a result, the amount of income we record from these investments can vary substantially from quarter to quarter. Future changes in market conditions, the future performance of the underlying investments or new information provided by private equity fund managers could affect the recorded values of these investments and the amounts realized upon liquidation.

We record an impairment charge to earnings when an investment has experienced a decline in fair value that is deemed to be other-than-temporary.

We record the excess of purchase cost over the fair value of net tangible assets of acquired companies as goodwill or other identifiable intangible assets. In the fourth quarter of each year, or as events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount, we complete the impairment testing of goodwill utilizing a discounted cash flow method. We selected the discounted cash flow methodology because we believe that it is comparable to what would be used by other market participants. We have defined our reporting units and completed the impairment testing of goodwill at the operating segment level, as defined by accounting guidance. Our operating segments are reporting units that engage in business activities for which discrete financial information, including five-year forecasts, is available.

Determining market values using a discounted cash flow method requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions, including long-term projections of cash flows, market conditions and appropriate discount rates. Our judgments are based upon historical experience, current market trends, consultations with external valuation specialists and other information. While we believe that the estimates and assumptions underlying the valuation methodology are reasonable, different estimates and assumptions could result in different outcomes. In estimating future cash flows, we rely on internally generated five-year forecasts for sales and operating profits, including capital expenditures, and generally a one to three percent long-term assumed annual growth rate of cash flows for periods after the five-year forecast. We generally develop these forecasts based upon, among other things, recent sales data for existing products, planned timing of new product launches, estimated housing starts and repair and remodeling estimates for existing homes.

In 2011, we utilized estimated housing starts, from independent industry sources, growing from current levels to 1.5 million units in 2016 (terminal growth year) and operating profit margins improving to approximate historical levels for those business units by 2016 (terminal growth year). We utilize our weighted average cost of capital of approximately seven percent as the basis to determine the discount rate to apply to the estimated future cash flows. In 2011, due to market conditions and based upon our assessment of the risks impacting each of our businesses, we applied a risk premium to increase the discount rate to a range of ten percent to 15 percent for most of our reporting units.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, we estimated that future discounted cash flows projected for most of our reporting units were greater than the carrying values. Any increases in estimated discounted cash flows would have no effect on the reported value of goodwill.

If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we measure the possible goodwill impairment based upon an allocation of the estimate of fair value of the reporting unit to all of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including any previously unrecognized intangible assets (Step Two Analysis). The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that a reporting unit’s recorded goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill.

In 2011, we recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for goodwill aggregating $486 million ($330 million, after tax). The pre-tax impairment charge of $44 million in the Cabinets and Related Products segment relates to our European ready-to-assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the continued declining demand for certain products, as well as decreased operating margins. The pre-tax impairment charge of $75 million in the Decorative Architectural Products segment relates to our builders’ hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for this business. The pre-tax impairment charge of $367 million in the Other Specialty Products segment relates to our North American window and door business. The charge reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western U.S. in 2011, the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that the recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than previously anticipated.

A ten percent decrease in the estimated fair value of our reporting units at December 31, 2011 would not have resulted in any additional analysis of goodwill impairment for any additional business unit.

We review our other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, in the fourth quarter, or as events occur or circumstances change that indicate the assets may be impaired without regard to the reporting unit. We consider the implications of both external (e.g., market growth, competition and local economic conditions) and internal (e.g., product sales and expected product growth) factors and their potential impact on cash flows related to the intangible asset in both the near- and long-term. In 2011, we recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $8 million ($5 million, after tax) attributable to our Plumbing Products segment ($1 million), and our Other Specialty Products segment ($7 million).

Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. We evaluate the remaining useful lives of amortizable identifiable intangible assets at each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining periods of amortization.

Our 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) provides for the issuance of stock-based incentives in various forms to employees and non-employee Directors. At December 31, 2011, outstanding stock-based incentives were in the form of long-term stock awards, stock options, phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights.

We grant long-term stock awards to key employees and non-employee Directors and do not cause net share dilution inasmuch as we continue the practice of repurchasing and retiring an equal number of shares on the open market. We measure compensation expense for stock awards at the market price of our common stock at the grant date. There was $107 million (ten million common shares) of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock awards at December 31, 2011, which was included as a reduction of common stock and paid-in capital. Effective January 1, 2010, the vesting period for stock awards awarded after January 1, 2010 is five years. For stock awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, we recognize this expense over the vesting period of the stock awards, typically five to ten years, or for executive grantees that are, or will become, retirement-eligible during the vesting period, we recognize the expense over five years or immediately upon a grantee’s retirement. Effective January 1, 2006, we recognize this expense ratably over the shorter of the vesting period of the stock awards, typically five to ten years (except for stock awards held by grantees age 66 or older, which vest over five years), or the length of time until the grantee becomes retirement-eligible at age 65. Pre-tax compensation expense for the annual vesting of long-term stock awards was $39 million for 2011.

We grant stock options to key employees. The exercise price equals the market price of our common stock at the grant date. These options generally become exercisable (vest ratably) over five years beginning on the first anniversary from the date of grant and expire no later than ten years after the grant date.

We measure compensation expense for stock options using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. We recognize this compensation expense ratably over the shorter of the vesting period of the stock options, typically five years, or the length of time until the grantee becomes retirement-eligible at age 65. Pre-tax compensation expense for stock options was $21 million for 2011.

We estimated the fair value of stock options at the grant date using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for 2011: risk-free interest rate – 2.69%, dividend yield – 2.35%, volatility factor – 49.03% and expected option life – six years. For expense calculation purposes, the weighted average grant-date fair value of option shares granted in 2011 was $5.07 per option share.

If we increased our assumptions for the risk-free interest rate and the volatility factor by 50 percent, the expense related to the fair value of stock options granted in 2011 would increase by 42 percent. If we lowered our assumptions for the risk-free interest rate and the volatility factor by 50 percent, the expense related to the fair value of stock options granted in 2011 would decrease by 53 percent.

Effective January 1, 2010, we froze all future benefit accruals under substantially all of our domestic qualified and non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans. As a result of this action, the liabilities for these plans were remeasured; in addition, certain assumptions appropriate for on-going plans (e.g., turnover, mortality and compensation increases) have been modified or eliminated for the remeasurement.

Accounting for defined-benefit pension plans involves estimating the cost of benefits to be provided in the future, based upon vested years of service, and attributing those costs over the time period each employee works. We develop our pension costs and obligations from actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions regarding inflation, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates and discount rates for obligations and expenses. We consider current market conditions, including changes in interest rates, in selecting these assumptions. Changes in assumptions used could result in changes to reported pension costs and obligations within our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, we decreased our discount rate for obligations to an average of 4.40 percent from 5.30 percent. The discount rate for obligations is based upon the expected duration of each defined-benefit pension plan’s liabilities matched to the December 31, 2011 Towers Watson Rate Link curve. The discount rates we use for our defined-benefit pension plans ranged from 2.00 percent to 5.50 percent, with the most significant portion of the liabilities having a discount rate for obligations of 4.20 percent or higher. The assumed asset return was primarily 7.25 percent, reflecting the expected long-term return on plan assets.

Our net underfunded amount for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans, which is the difference between the projected benefit obligation and plan assets, increased to $439 million at December 31, 2011 from $359 million at December 31, 2010, primarily due to lower rates of return in the bond market in 2011. In accordance with accounting guidance, the underfunded amount has been recognized on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2011 and 2010. Qualified domestic pension plan assets in 2011 had a net loss of approximately two percent compared to average gains of one percent for the corporate funds universe within the Independent Consultant Cooperative.

Our projected benefit obligation for our unfunded non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans was $174 million at December 31, 2011 compared with $163 million at December 31, 2010. This unfunded amount has been recognized on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

At December 31, 2011, we reported a net liability of $613 million, of which $174 million was related to our non-qualified, supplemental retirement plans, which are not subject to the funding requirements of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. In accordance with the Pension Protection Act, the Adjusted Funding Target Attainment Percentage (“AFTAP”) for the various defined-benefit pension plans ranges from 56 percent to 80 percent. At December 31, 2011, we had one plan that offered accelerated benefits (i.e., lump sum distributions) and the AFTAP for that plan is less than 80 percent; therefore, the plan is prohibited from allowing participants to receive any lump sum distribution in excess of 50 percent of the benefit value. In addition, plan amendments increasing benefits or liabilities for that plan are also prohibited.

We expect pension expense for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans to be $26 million in 2012 compared with $23 million in 2011. If we assumed that the future return on plan assets was one-half percent lower than the assumed asset return and the discount rate decreased by 50 basis points, the 2012 pension expense would increase by $3 million. We expect pension expense for our non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans to be $9 million in 2012 compared with $9 million in 2011.

We anticipate that we will be required to contribute approximately $60 million to $70 million in 2012 to our qualified and non-qualified defined-benefit plans.

The accounting guidance for income taxes requires that the future realization of deferred tax assets depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income in future periods. Possible sources of taxable income include taxable income in carryback periods, the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences recorded as a deferred tax liability, tax-planning strategies that generate future income or gains in excess of anticipated losses in the carryforward period and projected future taxable income.

If, based upon all available evidence, both positive and negative, it is more likely than not (more than 50 percent likely) such deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is recorded. Significant weight is given to positive and negative evidence that is objectively verifiable. A company’s three-year cumulative loss position is significant negative evidence in considering whether deferred tax assets are realizable and the accounting guidance restricts the amount of reliance the Company can place on projected taxable income to support the recovery of the deferred tax assets.

In the fourth quarter of 2010, we recorded a $372 million valuation allowance against our U.S. Federal deferred tax assets as a non-cash charge to income tax expense. In reaching this conclusion, we considered the weaker retail sales of certain of our building products and the slower than anticipated recovery in the U.S. housing market which led to U.S. operating losses and significant U.S. goodwill impairment charges, that primarily occurred in the fourth quarter of 2010, causing us to be in a three-year cumulative U.S. loss position. These factors negatively impact our ability to utilize tax-planning strategies that included the potential sale of certain non-core operating assets to support the realization of our U.S. Federal deferred tax assets, since current year losses are heavily weighted in determining if sufficient income would exist in the carryforward period to realize the benefit of the strategies.

During 2011, objective and verifiable negative evidence, such as continued U.S. operating losses and significant U.S. goodwill impairment charges, continued to outweigh positive evidence. As a result, we recorded an $89 million increase in the valuation allowance related to our U.S. Federal deferred tax assets as a non-cash charge to income tax expense.

Recording the valuation allowance does not restrict our ability to utilize the future deductions and net operating losses associated with the deferred tax assets assuming taxable income is recognized in future periods.

A rebound in the U.S. housing market from the current historic lows and retail sales of building products improving from their current levels should have a positive impact on our operating results in the U.S. A return to sustained profitability in the U.S. should result in objective positive evidence thereby warranting the potential reversal of all or a portion of the valuation allowance.

The $156 million and $228 million of deferred tax assets at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, for which there is no valuation allowance recorded, are anticipated to be realized through the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences recorded as deferred tax liabilities.

Should we determine that we would not be able to realize our remaining deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be recorded in the period such determination is made. The need to maintain a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets may cause greater volatility in our effective tax rate.

The current accounting guidance allows the recognition of only those income tax positions that have a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. We believe that there is an increased potential for volatility in our effective tax rate because this threshold allows changes in the income tax environment and the inherent complexities of income tax law in a substantial number of jurisdictions to affect the computation of our liability for uncertain tax positions to a greater extent.

While we believe we have adequately provided for our uncertain tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could vary from our liability for uncertain tax positions. Accordingly, additional provisions for tax-related matters, including interest and penalties, could be recorded in income tax expense in the period revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are settled or otherwise resolved.

Certain of our products and product finishes and services are covered by a warranty to be free from defects in material and workmanship for periods ranging from one year to the life of the product. At the time of sale, we accrue a warranty liability for estimated costs to provide products, parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations. Our estimate of costs to service our warranty obligations is based upon historical experience and expectations of future conditions. To the extent that we experience any changes in warranty claim activity or costs associated with servicing those claims, our warranty liability is adjusted accordingly.

The majority of our business is at the consumer retail level through home centers and major retailers. A consumer may return a product to a retail outlet that is a warranty return. However, certain retail outlets do not distinguish between warranty and other types of returns when they claim a return deduction from us. Our revenue recognition policy takes into account this type of return when recognizing revenue, and we record deductions at the time of sale.

We are subject to lawsuits and pending or asserted claims in the ordinary course of our business. Liabilities and costs associated with these matters require estimates and judgments based upon our professional knowledge and experience and that of our legal counsel. When estimates of our exposure for lawsuits and pending or asserted claims meet the criteria for recognition under accounting guidance, amounts are recorded as charges to earnings. The ultimate resolution of these exposures may differ due to subsequent developments. See Note S to our consolidated financial statements for information regarding certain of our legal proceedings.

Our current business strategy includes the rationalization of our business units, including consolidations, and increasing synergies among our business units. Going forward, we expect to maintain a balanced growth strategy with emphasis on cash flow, organic growth with fewer acquisitions and growth through new product development and greenfield locations related to certain Installation and Other Services businesses. As part of our strategic planning, we continue to review all of our businesses to determine which businesses may not be core to our long-term growth strategy.

During 2011, we determined that several business units in the Installation and Other Services segment were no longer core to our long-term growth strategy. These businesses were related to commercial drywall installation, millwork and framing; accordingly, we have embarked on a plan of disposition for these businesses and have accounted for these businesses as discontinued operations in 2011. In late 2011, we acquired a small manufacturer of hot tubs in the Plumbing Products segment. See Note B to the consolidated financial statements for more information.

Historically, we have largely funded our growth through cash provided by our operations, long-term bank debt and the issuance of notes in the financial markets, and by the issuance of our common stock, including issuances for certain mergers and acquisitions.

Maintaining high levels of liquidity and focusing on cash generation are among our financial strategies; such strategies have resulted in cash of approximately $1.7 billion at December 31, 2011. Our total debt as a percent of total capitalization was 84 percent and 72 percent at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

On June 21, 2010, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a bank group, with an aggregate commitment of $1.25 billion with a maturity date of January 10, 2014. The Credit Agreement provides for an unsecured revolving credit facility available to us and one of our foreign subsidiaries, in U.S. dollars, European euros and certain other currencies. Borrowings under the revolver denominated in euros are limited to $500 million, equivalent. We can also borrow swingline loans up to $150 million and obtain letters of credit of up to $250 million. Any outstanding Letters of Credit reduce our borrowing capacity. At December 31, 2011, we had $92 million of outstanding and unused Letters of Credit, reducing our borrowing capacity by such amount.

Our revolving credit loans bear interest under the Credit Agreement, at our option: at (A) a rate per annum equal to the greatest of (i) prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds effective rate plus 0.50% and (iii) LIBOR plus 1.0% (the “Alternative Base Rate”); plus an applicable margin based upon the then-applicable corporate credit ratings of the Company; or (B) LIBOR plus an applicable margin based upon the then-applicable corporate credit ratings of the Company. The foreign currency revolving credit loans bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin based upon the then-applicable corporate credit ratings of the Company.

In order to borrow under the Credit Agreement, we must not be in default of our covenants under the Credit Agreement (i.e., in addition to the debt to total capitalization covenant and a financial covenant, we must meet a minimum adjusted interest coverage ratio, principally limitations on subsidiary debt, negative pledge restrictions, legal compliance requirements and maintenance of properties and insurance) and our representations and warranties in the Credit Agreement must be true in all material respects (i.e., no material adverse change or litigation likely to result in a material adverse change, no material ERISA or environmental non-compliance and no material tax deficiency). We were in compliance with all covenants and we had no borrowings at December 31, 2011.

On February 11, 2011, we entered into an amendment (deemed to be effective and applicable as of December 31, 2010) of the Credit Agreement (the “Amendment”). The Amendment provided for the

add-back to shareholders’ equity in our debt to capitalization covenant of (i) certain non-cash charges (including impairment charges for financial investments and goodwill and other intangible assets) and (ii) changes to the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets included in income tax expense, each taken in 2010, which aggregated $986 million after tax. The Amendment also permitted us to add-back, if incurred, up to $350 million in the aggregate of future non-cash charges subsequent to December 31, 2010.

Based on the limitations of the debt to total capitalization covenant (before the Second Amendment discussed below), at December 31, 2011, we had additional borrowing capacity, subject to availability, of up to $178 million. Alternatively, at December 31, 2011, we could absorb a reduction to shareholders’ equity of approximately $96 million, and remain in compliance with the debt to total capitalization covenant.

On February 13, 2012, we entered into another amendment (deemed to be effective and applicable as of December 31, 2011) of the Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”). The Second Amendment provides for the add-back to shareholders’ equity in our debt to capitalization covenant of (i) certain non-cash charges (including impairment charges for financial investments and goodwill and other intangible assets) and (ii) changes to the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets included in income tax expense, each taken in 2010 and 2011, which aggregate $1.6 billion after tax. The Second Amendment also permits us to add-back, if incurred, up to $250 million in the aggregate of future non-cash charges subsequent to December 31, 2011. The Second Amendment also revised the permitted ratio of consolidated EBITDA to the consolidated interest expense to 2.25 to 1.00 through December 31, 2012, increasing to 2.50 to 1.00 with respect to each quarter thereafter.

Taking the Second Amendment into account, at December 31, 2011, we had additional borrowing capacity, subject to availability, of up to $630 million. Alternatively, at December 31, 2011, we could absorb a reduction to shareholders’ equity of approximately $340 million and remain in compliance with the debt to total capitalization covenant.

We have $791 million of fixed-rate debt due July 15, 2012 (“Notes”) with an interest rate of 5.875%. We plan to re-finance a portion of the Notes in 2012 and, therefore, we have entered into forward interest rate swap agreements to hedge the volatility in interest payments associated with this planned debt issuance. The interest rate swaps are intended to cover a notional amount of $400 million; we anticipate that we will redeem the remaining Notes for cash.

We had cash and cash investments of approximately $1.7 billion at December 31, 2011, principally as a result of strong cash flows from operations. Our cash and cash investments consist of overnight interest bearing money market demand and time deposit accounts, money market mutual funds containing government securities and treasury obligations. While we attempt to diversify these investments in a prudent manner to minimize risk, it is possible that future changes in the financial markets could affect the security or availability of these investments.

Of the $1.7 billion of cash and cash investments we held at both December 31, 2011 and 2010, $551 million and $493 million, respectively, is held in our foreign subsidiaries. If these funds were needed for our operations in the U.S., their repatriation into the U.S. may result in additional U.S. income taxes or foreign withholding taxes. The amount of such taxes is dependent on the income tax laws and circumstances at the time of distribution.

We have maintained investments in available-for-sale and marketable securities and a number of private equity funds, principally as part of our tax planning strategies, as any gains enhance the utilization of any current and future capital tax losses. We determined that the longer maturity of private equity funds would be advantageous and complement our investment in more liquid available-for-sale and marketable securities to balance risk. Since we have significantly reduced our capital tax losses in part by generating capital gains from investments and other sources, we have and will continue to reduce our investments in long-term financial assets.

We utilize derivative and hedging instruments to manage our exposure to currency fluctuations, primarily related to the European euro and the U.S. dollar; commodity cost fluctuations, primarily zinc and copper; and interest rate fluctuations, primarily related to our anticipated debt issuance in 2012. We review our hedging program, derivative positions and overall risk management on a regular basis.

Our working capital ratio was 1.5 to 1 and 2.3 to 1 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decline in the working capital ratio is primarily due to the classification to current liabilities of $791 million of 5.875% Notes due July 2012.

Significant sources and (uses) of cash in the past three years are summarized as follows, in millions:

Our cash and cash investments decreased $59 million to $1,656 million at December 31, 2011, from $1,715 million at December 31, 2010.

Net cash provided by operations of $239 million consisted primarily of net (loss) adjusted for non-cash and certain other items, including depreciation and amortization expense of $263 million, a $494 million charge for the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, a $(112) million net change in deferred taxes, a $86 million charge for the impairment of assets related to discontinued operations and other non-cash items, including stock-based compensation expense and amortization expense related to in-store displays.

We continue to emphasize balance sheet management, including working capital management and cash flow generation. Days sales in accounts receivable were 47 days at both December 31, 2011 and 2010, and days sales in inventories were 52 days at December 31, 2011 and 49 days at December 31, 2010. Accounts payable days were 63 days at December 31, 2011 and 51 days at December 31, 2010; the increase in payable days is due to our improved management of accounts payable. Working capital (defined as accounts receivable and inventories less accounts payable) as a percent of sales was 12.2 percent at December 31, 2011 and 13.4 percent at December 31, 2010; such improvement was primarily due to improved accounts payable management.

Net cash used for financing activities was $219 million, and included cash outflows of $107 million for cash dividends paid, $63 million for the net payment of debt and $30 million for the acquisition of our common stock to offset the dilutive impact of long-term stock awards granted in 2011.

At December 31, 2011, we had remaining authorization from our Board of Directors to repurchase up to an additional 25 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise. We believe that our present cash balance and cash flows from operations are sufficient to fund our near-term working capital and other investment needs. We believe that our longer-term working capital and other general corporate requirements will be satisfied through cash flows from operations and, to the extent necessary, from bank borrowings and future financial market activities. Consistent with past practice, we anticipate repurchasing shares in 2012 to offset any dilution from long-term stock awards granted or stock options exercised as part of our compensation programs.

Net cash used for investing activities was $61 million, and included $151 million for capital expenditures. Cash provided by investing activities included primarily $24 million of net proceeds from the disposition of property and equipment and $94 million from the net sale of financial investments.

We invest in automating our manufacturing operations to increase our productivity, improve customer service and support new product innovation. Capital expenditures for 2011 were $151 million, compared with $137 million for 2010 and $125 million for 2009; for 2012, capital expenditures, excluding any potential 2012 acquisitions, are expected to be approximately $180 million. Depreciation and amortization expense for 2011 totaled $263 million, compared with $279 million for 2010 and $254 million for 2009; for 2012, depreciation and amortization expense, excluding any potential 2012 acquisitions, is expected to be approximately $219 million. Amortization expense totaled $17 million, $18 million and $17 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Costs of environmental responsibilities and compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations have not had, nor do we expect them to have, a material effect on our capital expenditures, financial position or results of operations.

We report our financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States. However, we believe that certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios, used in managing the business, may provide users of this financial information with additional meaningful comparisons between current results and results in prior periods. Non-GAAP performance measures and ratios should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, our reported results.

Net sales for 2011 were $7.5 billion, relatively flat with 2010. Excluding results from acquisitions and the effect of currency translation, net sales decreased one percent compared with 2010. The following table reconciles reported net sales to net sales excluding acquisitions and the effect of currency translation, in millions:

Net sales for 2011 were adversely affected by lower sales volume of installed products, cabinets, paints and stains, builders’ hardware and windows, which, in aggregate, reduced sales by approximately three percent compared to 2010. Net sales for 2011 were also adversely affected by the planned exit of certain cabinet product lines, which reduced sales by approximately two percent compared to 2010. Such declines were partially offset by selling price increases, primarily related to plumbing products and paints and stains, which increased sales by approximately three percent. A weaker U.S. dollar increased sales by one percent compared to 2010.

Net sales for 2010 were adversely affected by lower sales volume of installed products and cabinets, which, in aggregate, reduced sales by approximately three percent compared to 2009. Net sales for 2010 were also negatively affected by lower sales volume of builders’ hardware and North American plumbing products, which reduced net sales by approximately one percent compared to 2009. Such declines were partially offset by a more favorable product mix of plumbing products and paints and stains, which increased sales by approximately one percent compared to 2009. Net sales volume in 2010 of our International plumbing products and windows increased in local currencies and increased consolidated net sales by approximately one percent compared to 2009. A stronger U.S. dollar decreased sales by one percent compared to 2009.

Our gross profit margins were 23.9 percent, 24.5 percent and 26.3 percent in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in the 2011 gross profit margin reflects lower sales volume and a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs. Such decreases were partially offset by the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 21.2 percent in 2011 compared with 21.3 percent in 2010 and 21.9 percent in 2009. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in 2011 reflect increased expenses related to growth initiatives, offset by lower business rationalization expenses and the benefits associated with such expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in 2010 reflect lower sales volume, increased advertising expenses related to new product introductions and increased system implementation costs.

Operating (loss) profit in 2011, 2010 and 2009 includes $121 million, $208 million and $94 million, respectively, of costs and charges related to business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives. Operating (loss) profit in 2011, 2010 and 2009 includes $494 million, $698 million and $262 million, respectively, of impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets. Operating (loss) profit in 2011 and 2009 includes $9 million and $7 million, respectively, of charges for litigation settlements. Operating (loss) profit margins, as reported, were (4.0) percent, (6.2) percent and 0.9 percent in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Operating profit margins, excluding the items above, were 4.4 percent, 5.9 percent and 5.7 percent in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Operating margins in 2011 were negatively affected by a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs, a less favorable product mix and increased expenses related to growth initiatives. Such decreases more than offset lower business rationalization costs and the benefits associated with such expenses.

Operating margins in 2010 were positively affected by the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives, which more than offset the negative effect of lower sales volume and the less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs.

During 2011, we recognized gains of $41 million related to the sale of TriMas common stock. We also recognized gains of $32 million related to distributions from private equity funds.

Other, net, for 2011 also included realized foreign currency losses of $5 million and other miscellaneous items.

During 2010, we recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges aggregating $34 million related to financial investments ($28 million related to Asahi Tec preferred stock and $6 million related to private equity funds and other private investments).

Other, net, for 2010 included $9 million of income from financial investments, net. Other, net, for 2010 also included realized foreign currency losses of $2 million and other miscellaneous items.

During 2009, we recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges aggregating $10 million for our investments in private equity funds.

Other, net, for 2009 included $3 million of income from financial investments, net. Other, net, for 2009 also included realized foreign currency gains of $17 million and other miscellaneous items.

Interest expense was $254 million, $251 million and $225 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in interest expense in 2011 and 2010 is primarily due to the issuance of $500 million of 7.125% notes in March 2010.

(Loss) Income and (Loss) Earnings Per Common Share from Continuing Operations (Attributable to Masco Corporation)

(Loss) and diluted (loss) per common share from continuing operations for 2011 were $(465) million and $(1.34) per common share, respectively. (Loss) and diluted (loss) per common share from continuing operations for 2010 were $(1,022) million and $(2.94) per common share, respectively. (Loss) and diluted (loss) per common share from continuing operations for 2009 were $(130) million and $(.38) per common share, respectively. (Loss) from continuing operations for 2011 included non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets of $494 million ($335 million or $.96 per common share, after tax). (Loss) from continuing operations for 2010 included non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets of $698 million ($586 million or $1.68 per common share, after tax). (Loss) from continuing operations for 2009 included non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for goodwill of $262 million ($180 million or $.51 per common share, after tax).

Our effective tax rate for the loss from continuing operations was a 10 percent tax benefit, a 32 percent tax expense, and a 32 percent tax benefit in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Compared to our normalized effective tax rate of 36 percent, the variance in the effective tax rate in 2011 and 2010 is due primarily to changes in the U.S. Federal valuation allowance, reversal of an accrual for uncertain tax positions and goodwill impairment charges providing no tax benefit.

In the fourth quarter of 2010, we recorded a $372 million valuation allowance against our U.S. Federal deferred tax assets as a non-cash charge to income tax expense. In reaching this conclusion, we considered the weaker retail sales of certain of our building products and the slower than anticipated recovery in the U.S. housing market which led to U.S. operating losses and significant U.S. goodwill impairment charges, that primarily occurred in the fourth quarter of 2010, causing us to be in a three-year cumulative U.S. loss position. These factors negatively impact our ability to utilize previously identified tax-planning strategies that included the potential sale of certain non-core operating assets to support the realization of our U.S. Federal deferred tax assets, since current year losses are heavily weighted in determining if sufficient income would exist in the carryfoward period to realize the benefits of the strategies.

Although we continue to be concerned about foreclosure activity and access to financing, housing starts improved in 2011 to 607,000 units. We are cautiously optimistic about the economic trends in 2012. We believe the major restructuring activities in our Installation and Other Services segment and in our North American cabinet operations have been completed.

We are focused on achieving our 2012 strategic initiatives, which include leveraging our brands, reducing our costs, improving our Installation and Cabinet segments and strengthening our balance sheet. We believe these initiatives, coupled with the actions we have taken over the past several years, should position us for improved results in 2012 even in a flat housing market, and continue to believe that we will outperform as the housing market recovers.

We believe and are confident that the long-term fundamentals for the new home construction and home improvement markets continue to be positive. We believe that our strong financial position, together with our current strategy of investing in leadership brands, including KRAFTMAID and MERILLAT cabinets, DELTA and HANSGROHE faucets, BEHR paint and MILGARD windows, our continued focus on innovation and our commitment to lean principles, will allow us to drive long-term growth and create value for our shareholders.

The following table sets forth our net sales and operating profit (loss) information by business segment and geographic area, dollars in millions.

Changes in operating profit margins in the following Business Segment and Geographic Area Results discussion exclude general corporate expense, net, charge for defined-benefit plan curtailment, charge for litigation settlements, accelerated stock compensation expense, loss on corporate fixed assets, net, and impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets in 2011, 2010 and 2009.

Over the past several years, we have been focused on the strategic rationalization of our businesses, including business consolidations, plant closures, headcount reductions, system implementations and other cost savings initiatives. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we incurred net pre-tax costs and charges related to these initiatives of $121 million, $208 million and $94 million, respectively.

During 2011, our North American cabinet business continued to incur costs and charges of $24 million related to the exit of its ready-to-assemble product line and $6 million related to the integration of its facilities. Our European manufacturer of ready to assemble cabinetry also incurred costs and charges of $9 million related to the closure of one manufacturing facility and the severance related to further headcount reductions. Our Installation and Other Services segment incurred costs and charges of $4 million related to the closure of several locations and further headcount reductions. Our builders’ hardware business in the Decorative Architectural Products segment incurred costs and charges of $9 million related to the exit of a product line. Our North American window manufacturer incurred costs and charges of $30 million related to the closure of several manufacturing facilities.

In 2010, we took several actions within the Cabinets and Related Products segment to rationalize our North American manufacturers, including closing plants, exiting product lines and integrating our Builder and Retail Cabinet Groups. We incurred costs and charges of $171 million in 2010 related to these actions.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, we decided to dispose of several non-core businesses in the Installation and Other Services segment. These businesses were related to commercial drywall installation, millwork and framing, and have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods.

Based on current plans, we anticipate costs and charges related to our business rationalizations and other initiatives to approximate $20 million in 2012. We continue to evaluate our businesses and may implement additional rationalization programs based on changes in our markets which could result in further costs and charges.

Net sales of Cabinets and Related Products decreased in 2011 primarily due to lower sales volumes of North American cabinets, which reduced sales by approximately four percent compared to 2010. Sales in this segment in 2011 were also negatively affected by the planned exit of North American ready-to-assemble and other non-core in-stock assembled cabinet product lines, particle board and door product lines, which reduced sales by approximately 11 percent compared to 2010. Sales were also negatively affected by lower sales volume of International cabinets, which reduced sales in this segment by approximately two percent compared to 2010. A weaker U.S. dollar increased sales by one percent in 2011 compared to 2010.

Net sales in this segment decreased in 2010 primarily due to lower sales volumes of North American cabinets, which reduced sales by approximately six percent compared to 2009. Sales in this segment in 2010 were also negatively affected by the planned exit of ready-to-assemble and other

non-core in-stock assembled cabinet product lines, particle board and door product lines, which reduced sales by approximately four percent compared to 2009. Sales were also negatively affected by lower sales volume of International cabinets, which reduced sales in this segment by approximately three percent compared to 2009. A stronger U.S. dollar decreased sales by one percent in 2010 compared to 2009.

Net sales in this segment in 2009 were negatively affected by a decline in sales volume in the new home construction and retail markets, as well as a less favorable product mix.

Operating margins in the Cabinets and Related Products segment in 2011 were positively affected by lower business rationalization expenses and the benefits associated with such expenses, including benefits related to the integration of the North American cabinet businesses. Such increases were partially offset by a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs, aggressive promotional activity and lower sales volume and the related under-absorption of fixed costs.

Operating margins in this segment in 2010 were negatively affected by lower sales volume and the related under-absorption of fixed costs, which reduced operating profit margins by approximately three percentage points. Operating profit margins in this segment in 2010 were also negatively affected by increased business rationalization expenses and a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs; such decreases more than offset the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

Operating margins in this segment in 2009 were negatively affected by lower sales volume in the new home construction and retail markets and the related under-absorption of fixed costs, as well as a less favorable product mix which, on a combined basis, reduced operating profit margins by approximately three percentage points compared to 2008. In 2009, operating profit margins in this segment were also negatively affected by increased plant closure and system implementation costs which were partially offset by the improved relationship between selling prices and commodity costs and the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

Net sales of Plumbing Products increased in 2011 primarily due to increased selling prices, which increased sales by approximately three percent compared to 2010. Sales were also positively affected by increased sales volume in North America and International, which, in aggregate, increased sales by approximately three percent compared to 2010. A weaker U.S. dollar increased sales by two percent in 2011 compared to 2010.

Net sales in this segment increased in 2010 primarily due to a more favorable product mix to North American retailers and wholesalers, which increased sales by approximately two percent compared to 2009. Sales were also positively affected by increased selling prices, which increased sales by approximately two percent compared to 2009. In local currencies, sales of International operations increased sales in this segment by approximately three percent compared to 2009. Such increases were partially offset by lower sales volume to North American retailers and wholesalers, which reduced sales by one percent compared to 2009. A stronger U.S. dollar decreased sales by one percent in 2010 compared to 2009.

Net sales in this segment in 2009 were negatively affected by lower sales volume to North American retailers and wholesalers. Reflecting the weakened global economy, net sales in this segment in 2009 were also negatively impacted by lower local currency sales volume of International operations.

Operating margins in the Plumbing Products segment in 2011 were negatively affected by a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs, a less favorable product mix and increased expenses related to growth initiatives which offset the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

Operating margins in this segment in 2010 were positively affected by a more favorable product mix and the positive relationship between selling prices and commodity costs and the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

Operating margins in this segment in 2009 were positively affected by the improved relationship between selling prices and commodity costs, as well as a more favorable product mix and the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

Net sales in the Installation and Other Services segment increased in 2011 primarily due to increased distribution sales, increased selling prices and increased retrofit and commercial sales. Such increases were partially offset by lower sales volume of installed products related to a continued decline in the new home construction market, the downward trend in the size and content of new houses in early 2011 and the increased multi-family construction; we gained share in single-family construction.

Net sales in this segment decreased in 2010 primarily due to lower sales volume related to reduced share in the new home construction market. Sales in this segment were also negatively affected by a downward trend in the size and content of new houses being constructed by our builder customers.

Net sales in this segment in 2009 were negatively affected by significantly lower sales volume related to the decline in the new home construction market, as well as lower selling prices.

Operating margins in the Installation and Other Services segment in 2011 were positively affected by increased sales volume, the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives and a more favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs.

Operating margins in this segment in 2010 were negatively affected by lower sales volume in the new home construction market and the related under-absorption of fixed costs, as well as a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs. Such declines were partially offset by the benefits associated with business rationalization and other cost savings initiatives and lower system implementation costs in 2010.

Operating margins in this segment in 2009 were negatively affected by lower sales volume and the related under-absorption of fixed costs, selling price decreases and increased system implementation costs in 2009.

Net sales of Decorative Architectural Products decreased in 2011, primarily due to lower sales volume of paints and stains and builders’ hardware. Such declines in 2011 were partially offset by increased selling prices of paints and stains.

Net sales in this segment decreased in 2010, primarily due to lower sales volume of builders’ hardware and lower selling prices of paints and stains. Such declines in 2010 were partially offset by a more favorable product mix of paints and stains, related to new product introductions.

Net sales in this segment 2009 were positively affected by increased sales volume of paints and stains, which offset lower sales volume of builders’ hardware.

Operating margins in the Decorative Architectural Products segment in 2011 were negatively affected by a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs related to paints and stains and increased expenses related to growth initiatives. This segment was also negatively affected by increased business rationalization expenses related to the exit of a builders’ hardware product line.

Operating margins in this segment in 2010 were negatively affected by a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs related to paints and stains, as well as lower sales volume of builders’ hardware. Such declines more than offset the benefit of a more favorable product mix of paints and stains, related to new product introductions.

Operating margins in this segment in 2009 were positively affected by increased sales volume of paints and stains, which more than offset lower sales volume of builders’ hardware. The operating profit margins in this segment in 2009 also benefited from the improved relationship between selling prices and commodity costs related to paints and stains and builders’ hardware, as well as lower program costs related to builders’ hardware.

Net sales of Other Specialty Products decreased in 2011 primarily due to lower sales volume of windows in North America (due to the expiration of the energy tax credit in 2010) and the U.K., partially offset by increased selling prices and increased sales related to new product introductions and geographic expansion. A weaker U.S. dollar increased sales in this segment by one percent compared to 2010.

Net sales in this segment increased in 2010 primarily due to increased sales volume of windows in North America, principally related to the energy-savings tax credit, which expired at the end of 2010, which increased sales in this segment by approximately one percent compared to 2009. Net sales were also positively affected by increased sales volume of staple gun tackers and other fastening tools, which increased sales in this segment by approximately one percent compared to 2009.

Net sales in this segment in 2009 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of windows, selling price decreases and a less favorable product mix.

Operating margins in the Other Specialty Products segment in 2011 were negatively affected by increased business rationalization expenses, lower sales volume and increased product launch and geographic expansion costs. Such decreases offset a more favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs and the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

Operating margins in the Other Specialty Products segment in 2010 reflect the negative effect of a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs and a less favorable windows product mix. Such declines offset the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

Operating margins in this segment in 2009 reflect the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives which offset the negative effect of lower sales volume of windows and staple gun tackers and other fastening tools and the related under-absorption of fixed costs, as well as a less favorable product mix.

North American net sales in 2011 were negatively impacted by lower sales volume of cabinets, including the planned exit of certain product lines, paints and stains, builders’ hardware and windows, which, in the aggregate, decreased sales by approximately six percent compared to 2010. Such declines were partially offset by increased selling prices of plumbing products and paints and stains, which increased sales by approximately three percent compared to 2010.

North American net sales in 2010 were negatively impacted by lower sales volume of installation and other services, cabinets, plumbing products, and builders’ hardware, which, in the aggregate, decreased sales by approximately four percent compared to 2009. Such declines were partially offset by a more favorable product mix of plumbing products and paints and stains, which increased sales by approximately one percent compared to 2009.

North American net sales in 2009 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of installation and other services, cabinets and windows in the new home construction market. In addition, North American net sales in 2009 were negatively affected by lower retail sales volume of cabinets, plumbing products, builder’s hardware and staple gun tackers and other fastening tools.

Operating margins from North American operations in 2011 were positively affected by lower business rationalization expenses and the benefits associated with business rationalization and other cost savings initiatives, which increased operating margins by two percentage points. Such increases offset the negative impact of lower sales volume and the related under-absorption of fixed costs and a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs which, in the aggregate, decreased operating profit margins by one percentage point in 2011 compared to 2010.

Operating margins from North American operations in 2010 were negatively affected by lower sales volume and the related under-absorption of fixed costs and a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs, which decreased operating profit margins by two percentage points in 2010 compared to 2009. Operating margins were also negatively affected by increased business rationalization costs and charges in 2010 compared to 2009.

Operating margins from North American operations in 2009 were negatively affected by sales volume declines and the related under-absorption of fixed costs, selling price decreases and a less favorable product mix in new home construction markets, which decreased operating profit margins by one percentage point in 2009 compared to 2008. Operating margins were also negatively affected by increased rationalization costs and charges in 2009 compared to 2008. Such declines were partially offset by the improved relationship between selling prices and commodity costs for cabinets, plumbing products and paints and stains, as well as the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

Net sales from International operations increased in local currencies by approximately three percent compared to 2010, primarily due to increased sales volume and increased selling prices of International plumbing products, offset by lower sales volume of International cabinets. A weaker U.S. dollar increased International net sales by five percent in 2011 compared to 2010.

Net sales from International operations increased in local currencies in 2010 by approximately five percent compared to 2009, primarily due to increased sales volume and increased selling prices of International plumbing products and windows, offset by lower sales volume of International cabinets. A stronger U.S. dollar decreased International net sales by five percent in 2010 compared to 2009.

Net sales from International operations decreased in 2009 primarily due to lower sales volume of plumbing products and cabinets; such declines in 2009 were partially offset by selling price increases.

Operating profit margins from International operations in 2011 were negatively affected by a less favorable product mix and a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs, partially offset by the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

Operating profit margins from International operations in 2010 were negatively affected by a less favorable product mix, partially offset by the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

Operating profit margins in 2009 were positively affected by the improved relationship between selling prices and commodity costs, as well as the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

Information regarding our legal proceedings is set forth in Note S to the consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.

With respect to our investments in private equity funds, we had, at December 31, 2011, commitments to contribute up to $25 million of additional capital to such funds, representing our aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date. We are contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to these private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund. We have no control over when or if the capital calls will occur. Capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of our investment in the private equity fund when paid.

We enter into contracts, which include reasonable and customary indemnifications that are standard for the industries in which we operate. Such indemnifications include claims made against builders by homeowners for issues relating to our products and workmanship. In conjunction with divestitures and other transactions, we occasionally provide reasonable and customary indemnifications relating to various items, including: the enforceability of trademarks; legal and environmental issues; and provisions for sales returns. We have never had to pay a material amount related to these indemnifications, and we evaluate the probability that amounts may be incurred and we appropriately record an estimated liability when probable.

The following table provides payment obligations related to current contracts at December 31, 2011, in millions:

Refer to Footnote M of our financial statements for defined-benefit plan obligations.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements. Effective January 1, 2011, we adopted new accounting guidance which addresses how to determine whether a sales arrangement involves multiple deliverables or contains more than one unit of accounting, and how the sales arrangement consideration should be allocated among the separate units of accounting. We evaluated this new guidance and the adoption did not have an impact on our financial position or our results of operations.

In June 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding the presentation and disclosure of comprehensive income. The new guidance will require presentation of other comprehensive income items in our consolidated statement of income; such items will no longer be included in the statement of shareholders’ equity. The new guidance will be effective for us January 1, 2012. The new guidance will also require additional disclosure for reclassification of items from other comprehensive income to our statement of income; however, this requirement has been delayed. We do not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our financial condition or our results of operations.

In September 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding impairment testing of goodwill. The new guidance would allow us to make a qualitative determination regarding potential goodwill impairment before performing the quantitative impairment test. The new guidance will be effective for us January 1, 2012. We do not anticipate utilizing the qualitative provisions of the new guidance.

We have considered the provisions of accounting guidance regarding disclosure of accounting policies for derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments, and disclosure of quantitative and qualitative information about market risk inherent in derivative financial instruments, other financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments.

We are exposed to the impact of changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity costs in the normal course of business and to market price fluctuations related to our financial investments. We have involvement with derivative financial instruments and use such instruments to the extent necessary to manage exposure to foreign currency fluctuations and commodity fluctuations. See Note F to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our derivative instruments.

At December 31, 2011, we had entered into foreign currency forward contracts to manage exposure to currency fluctuations related primarily to the European euro and the U.S. dollar, several metals contracts to manage our exposure to increases in the price of copper and zinc and interest rate swap agreements to hedge the volatility in interest payments associated with our expected debt issuance in 2012.

At December 31, 2011, we performed sensitivity analyses to assess the potential loss in the fair values of market risk sensitive instruments resulting from a hypothetical change of 10 percent in foreign currency exchange rates, a 10 percent decline in the market value of our long-term investments, a 10 percent change in commodity costs, or a 10 percent change in interest rates. Based upon the analyses performed, such changes would not be expected to materially affect our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The management of Masco Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Masco Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The management of Masco Corporation assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework.” Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, performed an audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and of the effectiveness of Masco Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. Their report expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Masco Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 and expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s 2011 consolidated financial statements. This report appears under Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data under the heading Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a) (1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Masco Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 8. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Masco Corporation and all majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The Company consolidates the assets, liabilities and results of operations of variable interest entities, for which the Company is the primary beneficiary.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions in the Preparation of Financial Statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the Company to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of any contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue as title to products and risk of loss is transferred to customers or when services are rendered, net of applicable provisions for discounts, returns and allowances. The Company records revenue for unbilled services performed based upon estimates of material and labor incurred in the Installation and Other Services segment; such amounts are recorded in Receivables. Amounts billed for shipping and handling are included in net sales, while costs incurred for shipping and handling are included in cost of sales.

Customer Promotion Costs. The Company records estimated reductions to revenue for customer programs and incentive offerings, including special pricing and co-operative advertising arrangements, promotions and other volume-based incentives. In-store displays that are owned by the Company and used to market the Company’s products are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets and are amortized using the straight-line method over the expected useful life of three years; related amortization expense is classified as a selling expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Foreign Currency. The financial statements of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are measured using the local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at exchange rates as of the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates in effect during the year. The resulting cumulative translation adjustments have been recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity. Realized foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in the consolidated statements of income in other income (expense), net.

Cash and Cash Investments. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash investments.

Receivables. The Company does significant business with a number of customers, including certain home centers and homebuilders. The Company monitors its exposure for credit losses on its customer receivable balances and the credit worthiness of its customers on an on-going basis and records related allowances for doubtful accounts. Allowances are estimated based upon specific customer balances, where a risk of default has been identified, and also include a provision for non-customer specific defaults based upon historical collection, return and write-off activity. During downturns in the Company’s markets, declines in the financial condition and creditworthiness of customers impacts the credit risk of the receivables involved and the Company has incurred additional bad debt expense related to customer defaults. A separate allowance is recorded for customer incentive rebates and is generally based upon sales activity. Receivables are presented net of certain allowances (including allowances for doubtful accounts) of $61 million and $65 million at December 31,

2011 and 2010, respectively. Receivables include unbilled revenue related to the Installation and Other Services segment of $17 million and $12 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Property and Equipment. Property and equipment, including significant betterments to existing facilities, are recorded at cost. Upon retirement or disposal, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in the consolidated statements of income. Maintenance and repair costs are charged against earnings as incurred.

The Company reviews its property and equipment as an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the property and equipment below the carrying amount. If the carrying amount of property and equipment is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows, then the Company would recognize an impairment loss for the difference between the carrying amount and the current fair value. Further, the Company evaluates the remaining useful lives of property and equipment at each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining depreciation periods.

Depreciation. Depreciation expense is computed principally using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Annual depreciation rates are as follows: buildings and land improvements, 2 to 10 percent, and machinery and equipment, 5 to 33 percent. Depreciation expense was $246 million, $261 million and $237 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The Company performs its annual impairment testing of goodwill in the fourth quarter of each year, or as events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The Company has defined its reporting units and completed the impairment testing of goodwill at the operating segment level. The Company’s operating segments are reporting units that engage in business activities, for which discrete financial information, including five-year forecasts, are available. The Company compares the fair value of the reporting units to the carrying value of the reporting units for goodwill impairment testing. Fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow method, which includes significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs).

Determining market values using a discounted cash flow method requires the Company to make significant estimates and assumptions, including long-term projections of cash flows, market conditions and appropriate discount rates. The Company’s judgments are based upon historical experience, current market trends, consultations with external valuation specialists and other information. In estimating future cash flows, the Company relies on internally generated five-year forecasts for sales and operating profits, including capital expenditures, and generally a one to three percent long-term assumed annual growth rate of cash flows for periods after the five-year forecast. The Company utilizes its weighted average cost of capital of approximately seven percent as the basis to determine the discount rate to apply to the estimated future cash flows. In recent years, due to market conditions, the Company increased the discount rate to a range of ten percent to 15 percent for most of its reporting units. The Company records an impairment to goodwill (adjusting the value to the estimated fair value) if the book value exceeds the estimated fair value, on a non-recurring basis.

The Company reviews its other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of each year, or as events occur or circumstances change that indicate the assets may be impaired without regard to the reporting unit. The Company considers the implications of both external (e.g., market growth, competition and local economic conditions) and internal (e.g., product sales and expected product growth) factors and their potential impact on cash flows related to the intangible asset in both the near- and long-term.

Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. The Company evaluates the remaining useful lives of amortizable intangible assets at each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining periods of amortization. See Note H for additional information regarding Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.

Fair Value Accounting. The Company follows accounting guidance for its financial investments and liabilities which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company also follows this guidance for its non-financial investments and liabilities.

The fair value of financial investments and liabilities is determined at each balance sheet date and future declines in market conditions, the future performance of the underlying investments or new information could affect the recorded values of the Company’s investments in marketable securities, private equity funds and other private investments.

The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage certain exposure to fluctuations in earnings and cash flows resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, commodity costs and interest rate exposures. Derivative financial instruments are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets as either an asset or liability measured at fair value. For each derivative financial instrument that is designated and qualifies as a fair-value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized in determining current earnings during the period of the change in fair values. For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss is recognized in determining current earnings during the period of the change in fair value.

Warranty. At the time of sale, the Company accrues a warranty liability for estimated costs to provide products, parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations. The Company’s estimate of costs to service its warranty obligations is based upon historical experience and expectations of future conditions.

A majority of the Company’s business is at the consumer retail level through home centers and major retailers. A consumer may return a product to a retail outlet that is a warranty return. However, certain retail outlets do not distinguish between warranty and other types of returns when they claim a return deduction from the Company. The Company’s revenue recognition policy takes into account this type of return when recognizing revenue, and deductions are recorded at the time of sale.

Product Liability. The Company provides for expenses associated with product liability obligations when such amounts are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The accruals are adjusted as new information develops or circumstances change that would affect the estimated liability.

Stock-Based Compensation. The Company measures compensation expense for stock awards at the market price of the Company’s common stock at the grant date. Effective January 1, 2006, such expense is being recognized ratably over the shorter of the vesting period of the stock awards, typically 5 to 10 years (except for stock awards held by grantees age 66 or older, which vest over five years), or the length of time until the grantee becomes retirement-eligible at age 65. For stock awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, such expense is being recognized over the vesting period of the stock awards, typically 10 years, or for executive grantees that are, or will become, retirement-eligible during the vesting period, the expense is being recognized over five years or immediately upon a grantee’s retirement.

The Company measures compensation expense for stock options using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Such expense is being recognized ratably over the shorter of the vesting period of the stock options, typically five years, or the length of time until the grantee becomes retirement-eligible at age 65. The Company utilizes the shortcut method to determine the tax windfall pool associated with stock options.

Noncontrolling Interest. The Company owns 68 percent of Hansgrohe AG at both December 31, 2011 and 2010. The aggregate noncontrolling interest, net of dividends, at December 31, 2011 and 2010 has been recorded as a component of equity on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Interest and Penalties on Uncertain Tax Positions. The Company records interest and penalties on its uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.

Reclassifications. Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2011 presentation in the consolidated financial statements. In the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows, the cash flows from discontinued operations are not separately classified.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements. Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted new accounting guidance which addresses how to determine whether a sales arrangement involves multiple deliverables or contains more than one unit of accounting, and how the sales arrangement consideration should be allocated among the separate units of accounting. The Company evaluated this new guidance and the adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or its results of operations.

In June 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding the presentation and disclosure of comprehensive income. The new guidance will require presentation of other comprehensive income items in the Company’s consolidated statement of income; such items will no longer be included in the statement of shareholders’ equity. The new guidance will be effective for the Company January 1, 2012. The new guidance will also require additional disclosure for reclassification of items from other comprehensive income to the Company’s statement of income; however, this requirement has been delayed. The Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or its results of operations.

In September 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding impairment testing of goodwill. The new guidance would allow the Company to make a qualitative determination regarding potential goodwill impairment before performing the quantitative impairment test. The new guidance will be effective for the Company January 1, 2012. The Company does not currently anticipate utilizing the qualitative provisions of the new guidance.

The presentation of discontinued operations includes components of the Company that the Company intends to sell, which comprises operations and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished from the rest of the Company. The Company has accounted for the business units identified in 2011 and those which were sold in 2009 as discontinued operations.

During 2011, the Company determined that several businesses in the Installation and Other Services segment were not core to the Company’s long-term growth strategy. These businesses provide commercial drywall installation, millwork and framing services; accordingly, the Company has embarked on a plan of sale for these businesses.

During 2009, the Company sold several business units that were not core to the Company’s long-term growth strategy.

Losses from these 2011 and 2009 discontinued operations were included in loss from discontinued operations, net, in the consolidated statements of income.

Selected financial information for the discontinued operations during the period owned by the Company, were as follows, in millions:

Included in loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net in 2011 is the impairment of indefinite and definite-lived intangible assets of $56 million, the impairment of goodwill of $13 million and the impairment of fixed and other assets of $17 million. Also included in the loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net in 2011 is $3 million expense reflecting the adjustment of certain assets related to businesses disposed in prior years.

Included in income tax benefit was $6 million related to (loss) from discontinued operations in 2009.

The income tax benefit recorded in 2010 relates primarily to the allocation of an income tax benefit to impairment charges on goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets of certain discontinued operations.

The unusual relationship between income taxes and (loss) before income taxes in 2011 and 2009 resulted primarily from certain losses providing no current tax benefit.

Also during 2011, the Company decided to exit a product line in builders’ hardware in the Decorative Architectural Products segment with net sales of $1 million and an operating loss of $15 million in 2011 (including $8 million to write-down inventory related to satisfaction of contractual obligations); this business will be included in continuing operations through the date of disposal.

In late 2011, the Company acquired a small manufacturer of hot tubs in the Plumbing Products segment; this business allows the Company to expand its spa offering into additional price point categories. During 2009, the Company acquired a small business in the Plumbing Products segment; this business allows the Company to expand into a developing market and had annual sales of $11 million.

The results of all acquisitions are included in the consolidated financial statements from the respective dates of acquisition.

The total net cash purchase price of these acquisitions was $10 million and $6 million, respectively, in 2011 and 2009.

Certain purchase agreements provided for the payment of additional consideration in cash, contingent upon whether certain conditions are met, including the operating performance of the acquired business. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, there was no outstanding contingent consideration.

Inventories, which include purchased parts, materials, direct labor and applied manufacturing overhead, are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined by use of the first-in, first-out method.

Accounting Policy. The Company follows accounting guidance that defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements for its financial investments and liabilities. The guidance defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” Further, it defines a fair value hierarchy, as follows: Level 1 inputs as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs as observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by market data; and Level 3 inputs as unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models or instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

Financial investments that are available to be traded on readily accessible stock exchanges (domestic or foreign) are considered to have active markets and have been valued using Level 1 inputs. Financial investments that are not available to be traded on a public market or have limited secondary markets, or contain provisions that limit the ability to sell the investment are considered to have inactive markets and have been valued using Level 2 or 3 inputs. The Company incorporated credit risk into the valuations of financial investments by estimating the likelihood of non-performance by the counterparty to the applicable transactions. The estimate included the length of time relative to the contract, financial condition of the counterparty and current market conditions. The criteria for determining if a market was active or inactive were based on the individual facts and circumstances.

Financial Investments. The Company has maintained investments in available-for-sale securities and a number of private equity funds and other private investments, principally as part of its tax planning strategies, as any gains enhance the utilization of any current and future tax capital losses.

The Company’s investments in available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows, in millions:

The Company’s investments in private equity funds and other private investments are carried at cost. At December 31, 2011, the Company has investments in 17 venture capital funds, with an aggregate carrying value of $17 million. The venture capital funds invest in start-up or smaller, early-stage established businesses, principally in the information technology, bio-technology and health care sectors. At December 31, 2011, the Company also has investments in 22 buyout funds, with an aggregate carrying value of $69 million. The buyout funds invest in later-stage, established businesses and no buyout fund has a concentration in a particular sector.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements. For financial investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis at each reporting period, the unrealized gains or losses (that are deemed to be temporary) are recognized, net of tax effect, through shareholders’ equity, as a component of other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses and charges for other-than-temporary impairments are included in determining net income, with related purchase costs based upon specific identification.

For marketable securities, the Company reviews, on a recurring basis, industry analyst reports, key ratios and statistics, market analyses and other factors for each investment to determine if an unrealized loss is other-than-temporary.

In the past, the Company invested excess cash in auction rate securities. Auction rate securities are investment securities that have interest rates which are reset every 7, 28 or 35 days. The fair values of the auction rate securities held by the Company have been estimated, on a recurring basis, using a discounted cash flow model (Level 3 input). The significant inputs in the discounted cash flow model used to value the auction rate securities include: expected maturity of auction rate securities, discount rate used to determine the present value of expected cash flows and assumptions for credit defaults, since the auction rate securities are backed by credit default swap agreements.

During 2010, the Company and Asahi Tec agreed to amend the preferred stock to include a more favorable conversion feature into common stock and to include a mandatory conversion date of February 28, 2011. As a result of the amendment, the Company recognized a $28 million impairment loss based on the current fair value of the preferred stock on an if-converted basis at June 30, 2010. Also, as a result of the amendment, the Company reversed an unrealized gain of $23 million that was previously included in accumulated other comprehensive income. During the last six months of 2010, the Company converted all its holdings of Asahi Tec preferred stock into common stock which was sold, in its entirety, in open market transactions. The Company realized cash proceeds of $11 million and realized losses aggregating $8 million in 2010. As a result of the disposition of the Asahi Tec common stock, the Company received a tax refund of $16 million in 2011 relating to the utilization of a loss carryback to offset taxes paid on prior capital gains.

During 2011 and 2010, the Company sold 1,974,000 shares and 481,000 shares, respectively, of its investment in TriMas common stock for cash of $43 million and $10 million, respectively; at December 31, 2011, the Company does not own any shares of TriMas common stock.

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements. It is not practicable for the Company to estimate a fair value for private equity funds and other private investments because there are no quoted market prices, and sufficient information is not readily available for the Company to utilize a valuation model to determine the fair value for each fund. These investments are evaluated, on a non-recurring basis, for potential other-than-temporary impairment when impairment indicators are present, or when an event or change in circumstances has occurred, that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment.

Impairment indicators the Company considers include the following: whether there has been a significant deterioration in earnings performance, asset quality or business prospects; a significant adverse change in the regulatory, economic or technological environment; a significant adverse change in the general market condition or geographic area in which the investment operates; industry and sector performance; current equity and credit market conditions; and any bona fide offers to purchase the investment for less than the carrying value. The Company also considers specific adverse conditions related to the financial health of and business outlook for the fund, including industry and sector performance. The significant assumptions utilized in analyzing a fund for potential other-than-temporary impairment include current economic conditions, market analysis for specific funds and performance indicators in the residential and commercial construction, bio-technology, health care and information technology sectors in which the applicable funds’ investments operate. Since there is no active trading market for these investments, they are for the most part illiquid. These investments, by their nature, can also have a relatively higher degree of business risk, including financial leverage, than other financial investments. Future changes in market conditions, the future performance of the underlying investments or new information provided by private equity fund managers could affect the recorded values of such investments and the amounts realized upon liquidation. Due to the significant unobservable inputs, the fair value measurements used to evaluate impairment are a Level 3 input.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements. Financial investments and (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis at each reporting period and the amounts for each level within the fair value hierarchy were as follows, in millions:

The following table summarizes the changes in Level 3 financial investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, in millions:

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements. During 2011, there were not any financial investments measured on a non-recurring basis. Financial investments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during 2010 and the amounts for each level within the fair value hierarchy were as follows, in millions:

None of the Company’s investments in private equity funds, for which fair value was determined, had unrealized losses in 2011 or 2010.

The remaining private equity investments in 2010 with an aggregate carrying value of $104 million, were not reviewed for impairment, as there were no indicators of impairment or identified events or changes in circumstances that would have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment.

Realized Gains (Losses) and Impairment Charges. The Company did not have any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 financial assets in 2011 or 2010. During 2010, based on information from the fund manager, the Company determined that the decline in the estimated value of three private equity funds (with an aggregate carrying value of $6 million prior to impairment) was other-than-temporary and, accordingly, recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges of $4 million. During 2010, the Company also determined that the decline in the estimated value of one private investment was other-than-temporary and, accordingly, recognized a non-cash, pre-tax impairment charge of $2 million.

During 2009, the Company determined that the decline in the estimated value of five private equity funds, with an aggregate carrying value of $41 million prior to impairment, was other-than-temporary. Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges of $10 million.

Income from financial investments, net, included in other, net, within other income (expense), net, and impairment charges for financial investments were as follows, in millions:

The impairment charges related to the Company’s financial investments recognized during 2010 and 2009 were based upon then-current estimates for the fair value of certain financial investments; such estimates could change in the near-term based upon future events and circumstances.

The fair value of the Company’s short-term and long-term fixed-rate debt instruments is based principally upon quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or the current rates available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. The aggregate estimated market value of short-term and long-term debt at December 31, 2011 was approximately $4.0 billion, compared with the aggregate carrying value of $4.0 billion. The aggregate estimated market value of short-term and long-term debt at December 31, 2010 was approximately $4.2 billion, compared with the aggregate carrying value of $4.1 billion.

The Company is exposed to global market risk as part of its normal daily business activities. To manage these risks, the Company enters into various derivative contracts. These contracts include interest rate swap agreements, foreign currency exchange contracts and contracts intended to hedge the Company’s exposure to copper and zinc. The Company reviews its hedging program, derivative positions and overall risk management on a regular basis.

Interest Rate Swap Agreements. In August of 2011, the Company entered into new interest rate swap agreements to hedge the volatility in interest payments associated with an expected debt issuance in 2012. These interest rate swaps are designed as cash flow hedges and effectively fix interest rates on the forecasted debt issuance to variable rates based on 3-month LIBOR. The average fixed rate on the interest rate swaps is 2.8%. At December 31, 2011, the interest rate swap agreements covered a notional amount of $400 million, which the Company expects to issue in connection with the maturity of the Company’s $791 million 5.875% fixed-rate debt due July 15, 2012. At December 31, 2011, the interest rate swaps are considered 100 percent effective; therefore, the market valuation of $23 million is recorded in other comprehensive income in the Company’s statement of shareholders’ equity with a corresponding increase to accrued other in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2011.

In 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized a decrease in interest expense of $10 million, $11 million and $10 million, respectively, related to the amortization of gains resulting from the terminations (in 2008 and 2004) of two interest rate swap agreements.

Foreign Currency Contracts. The Company’s net cash inflows and outflows exposed to the risk of changes in foreign currency exchange rates arise from the sale of products in countries other than the manufacturing source, foreign currency denominated supplier payments, debt and other payables, and investments in subsidiaries. To mitigate this risk during 2011 and 2010, the Company, including certain European operations, entered into foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency exchange contracts.

Gains (losses) related to foreign currency forward and exchange contracts are recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of income in other income (expense), net. In the event that the counterparties fail to meet the terms of the foreign currency forward contracts, the Company’s exposure is limited to the aggregate foreign currency rate differential with such institutions.

Metals Contracts. During 2011 and 2010, the Company entered into several contracts to manage its exposure to increases in the price of copper and zinc. Gains (losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of income in cost of goods sold.

The pre-tax (loss) gain included in the Company’s consolidated statements of income is as follows, in millions:

The Company presents its net derivatives due to the right of offset by its counterparties under master netting arrangements in current assets or accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. The notional amounts being hedged and the fair value of those derivative instruments, on a gross basis, is as follows, in millions:

The fair value of all metal and foreign currency derivative contracts is estimated on a recurring basis, quarterly, using Level 2 inputs (significant other observable inputs).

The Company leases certain equipment and plant facilities under noncancellable operating leases. Rental expense recorded in the consolidated statements of income totaled approximately $103 million, $111 million and $135 million during 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Future minimum lease payments at December 31, 2011 were approximately as follows: 2012 – $68 million; 2013 – $47 million; 2014 – $32 million; 2015 – $21 million; and 2016 and beyond – $95 million.

The Company leases operating facilities from certain related parties, primarily former owners (and in certain cases, current management personnel) of companies acquired. The Company recorded rental expense to such related parties of approximately $5 million, $6 million and $8 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

As a result of its business rationalization activities over the last several years, at December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company is holding several facilities for sale, within the Cabinets and Related Products segment and the Other Specialty Products segment. At December 31, 2011, the net book value of those facilities is approximately $49 million and approximates fair value. Fair value was estimated using a market approach, considering the estimated fair values for the other comparable buildings in the areas where the facilities are located, Level 3 inputs.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for 2011 and 2010, by segment, were as follows, in millions:

In the fourth quarters of 2011 and 2010, the Company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company assessed the goodwill related to the Installation and Other Services segment and determined no impairment was necessary at September 30, 2011.

The impairment tests in 2011 and 2010 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the Company’s reporting units was impaired. The Company recognized the non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges, in continuing operations, for goodwill of $486 million ($330 million, after tax) and $697 million ($586 million, after tax) for 2011 and 2010, respectively. In 2011, the pre-tax impairment charge in the Cabinets and Related Products segment relates to the European ready-to-assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products, as well as decreased operating margins. The pre-tax impairment charge in the Decorative Architectural Products segment relates to the builders’ hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business. The pre-tax impairment charge in the Other Specialty Products segment relates to the North American window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western U.S., the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated. In 2010, the pre-tax impairment charge in the Installation and Other Services segment reflects the Company’s expectation that the recovery in the new home construction market will be modestly slower than previously anticipated. The Company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at December 31, 2011.

Other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $174 million and $185 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and principally included registered trademarks. In 2011, the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a North American business unit in the Other Specialty Products segment and the registered trademark for a North American business unit in the Plumbing Products segment were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units. The Company recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $8 million ($5 million, after tax) in 2011. In 2010, the Company recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $10 million ($6 million after tax) related to the Installation and Other Services segment ($9 million pre-tax) and the Plumbing Products segment ($1 million pre-tax). During 2011, the Company allocated $9 million of the pre-tax impairment charge from the Installation and Other Services segment to discontinued operations.

The carrying value of the Company’s definite-lived intangible assets was $22 million at December 31, 2011 (net of accumulated amortization of $54 million) and $84 million at December 31, 2010 (net of accumulated amortization of $75 million) and principally included customer relationships and non-compete agreements, with a weighted average amortization period of 15 years in both 2011 and 2010. The change in definite-lived intangible assets is due to the classification of such assets related to business units held for sale. Subsequent to the classification, the Company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss; the charge included a write-down of $56 million for indefinite and definite-lived intangible assets. Amortization expense related to the definite-lived intangible assets of continuing operations was $6 million in each of 2011, 2010 and 2009.

At December 31, 2011, amortization expense related to the definite-lived intangible assets during each of the next five years was as follows: 2012 – $6 million; 2013 – $4 million; 2014 – $4 million; 2015 – $2 million; and 2016 – $2 million.

In-store displays are amortized using the straight-line method over the expected useful life of three years; the Company recognized amortization expense related to in-store displays of $24 million, $33 million and $44 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cash spent for displays was $17 million, $32 million and $26 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

All of the notes and debentures above are senior indebtedness and, other than the 6.625% notes due 2018 and the 7.75% notes due 2029, are redeemable at the Company’s option.

On March 10, 2010, the Company issued $500 million of 7.125% Notes (“Notes”) due March 15, 2020. The notes are senior indebtedness and are redeemable at the Company’s option.

The Company retired $300 million of floating rate notes on March 12, 2010, the scheduled maturity date.

During 2010, the Company repurchased $59 million of 5.875% Notes due July 2012, in open-market transactions. The Company paid a premium of $2 million over par value on the purchase of the notes; this cost was included in interest expense.

In July 2001, the Company issued $1.9 billion principal amount at maturity of Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 (“Old Notes”), resulting in gross proceeds of $750 million.

During 2011, holders of $108.1 million principal amount at maturity with an accreted value of $58.1 million of Notes required the Company to repurchase the Notes for cash of $57.9 million; the remaining Notes were retired. At December 31, 2011, no principal amount at maturity of Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 (“Notes”) was outstanding.

On June 21, 2010, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a bank group, with an aggregate commitment of $1.25 billion with a maturity date of January 10, 2014. The Company’s 5-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of November 5, 2004, as amended, was terminated at that time. On February 11, 2011, the Company entered into an amendment (deemed to be effective and applicable as of December 31, 2010) of the Credit Agreement with its bank group (the “Amendment”). The Amendment provided for the add-back to shareholders’ equity in the Company’s

debt to capitalization covenant of (i) certain non-cash charges (including impairment charges for financial investments and goodwill and other intangible assets) and (ii) changes to the valuation allowance on the Company’s deferred tax assets included in income tax expense, each taken in 2010, which aggregate $986 million after tax. The Amendment also permitted the Company to add-back, if incurred, up to $350 million in the aggregate of future non-cash charges beginning January 1, 2011.

The Credit Agreement provides for an unsecured revolving credit facility available to the Company and one of its foreign subsidiaries, in U.S. dollars, European euros and certain other currencies. Borrowings under the revolver denominated in euros are limited to $500 million, equivalent. The Company can also borrow swingline loans up to $150 million and obtain letters of credit of up to $250 million. Any outstanding Letters of Credit reduce the Company’s borrowing capacity. At December 31, 2011, the Company had $92 million of outstanding and unused Letters of Credit, reducing the Company’s borrowing capacity by such amount.

The Credit Agreement contains financial covenants requiring the Company to maintain (A) a maximum debt to total adjusted capitalization ratio of 65 percent, and (B) a minimum adjusted interest coverage ratio equal to or greater than (i) 2.25 to 1.0 through the quarter ending on September 30, 2011 and (ii) 2.50 to 1.0 thereafter.

Revolving credit loans bear interest under the Credit Agreement, at the Company’s option: at (A) a rate per annum equal to the greatest of (i) prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds effective rate plus 0.50% and (iii) LIBOR plus 1.0% (the “Alternative Base Rate”); plus an applicable margin based upon the then-applicable corporate credit ratings of the Company; or (B) LIBOR plus an applicable margin based upon the then-applicable corporate credit ratings of the Company. The foreign currency revolving credit loans bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin based upon the then-applicable corporate credit ratings of the Company.

Based on the limitations of the debt to total capitalization covenant (before the amendment discussed below), at December 31, 2011, the Company had additional borrowing capacity, subject to availability, of up to $178 million. Alternatively, at December 31, 2011, the Company could absorb a reduction to shareholders’ equity of approximately $96 million, and remain in compliance with the debt to total capitalization covenant.

In order to borrow under the Credit Agreement, there must not be any default in the Company’s covenants in the Credit Agreement (i.e., in addition to the two financial covenants, principally limitations on subsidiary debt, negative pledge restrictions, legal compliance requirements and maintenance of properties and insurance) and the Company’s representations and warranties in the Credit Agreement must be true in all material respects on the date of borrowing (i.e., principally no material adverse change or litigation likely to result in a material adverse change, since December 31, 2009, in each case, no material ERISA or environmental non-compliance and no material tax deficiency).

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company was in compliance with the requirements of the New Credit Agreement and the Amended Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, as applicable.

There were no borrowings under the Credit Agreement and the Amended Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement at December 31, 2011 and 2010, as applicable.

At December 31, 2011, the maturities of long-term debt during each of the next five years were as follows: 2012 – $803 million; 2013 – $201 million; 2014 – $1 million; 2015 – $501 million; and 2016 – $1 billion.

Interest paid was $254 million, $241 million and $226 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Subsequent Events. In January 2012, the Company repurchased $46 million of 5.875% Notes due July 2012 in open-market transactions. The Company paid a premium of approximately $1 million on the purchase of the Notes.

On February 13, 2012, the Company entered into an amendment (deemed to be effective and applicable as of December 31, 2011) of the Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”). The Second Amendment provides for the add-back to shareholders’ equity in the Company’s debt to capitalization covenant of (i) certain non-cash charges (including impairment charges for financial investments and goodwill and other intangible assets) and (ii) changes to the valuation allowance on the Company’s deferred tax assets included in income tax expense, each taken in 2010 and 2011, which aggregate $1.6 billion after tax. The Second Amendment also permits the Company to add-back, if incurred, up to $250 million in the aggregate of future non-cash charges subsequent to December 31, 2011. The Second Amendment also revised the permitted ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense to 2.25 to 1.00 through December 31, 2012, increasing to 2.50 to 1.00 with respect to each quarter thereafter.

Taking the Second Amendment into account, at December 31, 2011, the Company had additional borrowing capacity, subject to availability, of up to $630 million. Alternatively, at December 31, 2011, the Company could absorb a reduction to shareholders’ equity of approximately $340 million, and remain in compliance with the debt to total capitalization covenant.

The Company’s 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) provides for the issuance of stock-based incentives in various forms to employees and non-employee Directors of the Company. At December 31, 2011, outstanding stock-based incentives were in the form of long-term stock awards, stock options, phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights.

Pre-tax compensation expense (income) and the income tax benefit related to these stock-based incentives were as follows, in millions:

In 2009, the Company recognized $6 million of accelerated stock compensation expense (for previously granted stock awards and options) related to the retirement from full-time employment of the Company’s Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors; he continues to serve as a non-executive, non-employee Chairman of the Board of Directors.

At December 31, 2011, a total of 8,318,400 shares of Company common stock were available under the 2005 Plan for the granting of stock options and other long-term stock incentive awards.

Long-Term Stock Awards. Long-term stock awards are granted to key employees and non-employee Directors of the Company and do not cause net share dilution inasmuch as the Company continues the practice of repurchasing and retiring an equal number of shares on the open market.

The Company’s long-term stock award activity was as follows, shares in millions:

At December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, there was $107 million, $127 million and $126 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock awards; such awards had a weighted average remaining vesting period of four years for 2011 and five years for 2010 and 2009.

The total market value (at the vesting date) of stock award shares which vested during 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $28 million, $22 million and $16 million, respectively.

Stock Options. Stock options are granted to key employees of the Company. The exercise price equals the market price of the Company’s common stock at the grant date. These options generally become exercisable (vest ratably) over five years beginning on the first anniversary from the date of grant and expire no later than 10 years after the grant date. The 2005 Plan does not permit the granting of restoration stock options, except for restoration options resulting from options previously granted under the 1991 Plan. Restoration stock options become exercisable six months from the date of grant.

The Company granted 2,412,500 of stock option shares, including restoration stock option shares, during 2011 with a grant date exercise price range of $9 to $13 per share. During 2011, 3,032,900 stock option shares were forfeited (including options that expired unexercised).

At December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, there was $33 million, $45 million and $41 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense (using the Black-Scholes option pricing model at the grant date) related to unvested stock options; such options had a weighted average remaining vesting period of three years.

The weighted average grant date fair value of option shares granted and the assumptions used to estimate those values using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, was as follows:

The following table summarizes information for stock option shares outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2011, shares in millions:

Phantom Stock Awards and Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”). The Company grants phantom stock awards and SARs to certain non-U.S. employees.

Phantom stock awards are linked to the value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and are settled in cash upon vesting, typically over 5 to 10 years. The Company accounts for phantom stock awards as liability-based awards; the compensation expense is initially measured as the market price of the Company’s common stock at the grant date and is recognized over the vesting period. The liability is remeasured and adjusted at the end of each reporting period until the awards are fully-vested and paid to the employees. The Company recognized expense of $2 million, $2 million and $3 million related to the valuation of phantom stock awards for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company granted 349,550 shares, 299,650 shares and 318,920 shares, respectively, of phantom stock awards with an aggregate fair value of $4 million, $4 million and $3 million, respectively, and paid $2 million, $1 million and $1 million of cash in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to settle phantom stock awards.

SARs are linked to the value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and are settled in cash upon exercise. The Company accounts for SARs using the fair value method, which requires outstanding SARs to be classified as liability-based awards and valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model at the grant date; such fair value is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period, typically five years. The liability is remeasured and adjusted at the end of each reporting period until the SARs are exercised and payment is made to the employees or the SARs expire. The Company recognized expense (income) of $(1) million, $1 million and $4 million related to the valuation of SARs for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. During 2011, the Company did not grant any SARs. During 2010 and 2009, the Company granted SARs for 429,300 shares and 438,200 shares, respectively, with an aggregate fair value of $2 million and $1 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Information related to phantom stock awards and SARs was as follows, in millions:

The Company sponsors qualified defined-benefit and defined-contribution retirement plans for most of its employees. In addition to the Company’s qualified defined-benefit pension plans, the Company has unfunded non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans covering certain employees, which provide for benefits in addition to those provided by the qualified pension plans. Substantially all salaried employees participate in non-contributory defined-contribution retirement plans, to which payments are determined annually by the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Aggregate charges to earnings under the Company’s defined-benefit and defined-contribution retirement plans were $34 million and $31 million in 2011, $34 million and $47 million in 2010 and $59 million and $35 million in 2009, respectively.

In addition, the Company participates in 20 regional multi-employer pension plans, principally related to building trades; none of the plans are considered significant. The aggregate expense recognized through contributions by the Company to these plans was approximately $3 million, $3 million and $4 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

In March 2009, based on management’s recommendation, the Board of Directors approved a plan to freeze all future benefit accruals under substantially all of the Company’s domestic qualified and non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans. The freeze was effective January 1, 2010. As a result of this action, the liabilities for the plans impacted by the freeze were remeasured and the Company recognized a curtailment charge of $8 million in the first quarter of 2009.

Changes in the projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets, and the funded status of the Company’s defined-benefit pension plans were as follows, in millions:

Amounts in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets were as follows, in millions:

Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income before income taxes were as follows, in millions:

Information for defined-benefit pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets was as follows, in millions:

The projected benefit obligation was in excess of plan assets for all of the Company’s qualified defined-benefit pension plans at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Net periodic pension cost for the Company’s defined-benefit pension plans was as follows, in millions:

The Company expects to recognize $16 million of pre-tax net loss from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic pension cost in 2012 related to its defined-benefit pension plans.

Plan Assets. The Company’s qualified defined-benefit pension plan weighted average asset allocation, which is based upon fair value, was as follows:

Plan assets included 1.2 million shares for each of the years, of Company common stock valued at $12 million and $14 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company’s qualified defined-benefit pension plans have adopted accounting guidance that defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements. Accounting guidance defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.”

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value. There have been no changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 2011.

Common and preferred stocks, debt securities, government securities and short-term and other investments: Valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded.

Limited Partnerships: Valued based on an estimated fair value. There is no active trading market for these investments and they are for the most part illiquid. Due to the significant unobservable inputs, the fair value measurements are a Level 3 input.

Common Collective Trust Fund: Valued based on a unit value basis, which approximates fair value as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Such basis is determined by reference to the respective fund’s underlying assets, which are primarily marketable equity and fixed income securities. There are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with this fund.

The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.

The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the qualified defined-benefit pension plan assets at fair value as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, in millions.

The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the qualified defined-benefit pension plan level 3 assets for the year ended December 31, 2011, in millions.

Assumptions. Major assumptions used in accounting for the Company’s defined-benefit pension plans were as follows:

The discount rate for obligations for 2011 and 2010 was based upon the expected duration of each defined-benefit pension plan’s liabilities matched to the December 31, 2011 and 2010 Towers Watson Rate Link Curve. At December 31, 2011, such rates for the Company’s defined-benefit pension plans ranged from 2.00 percent to 5.50 percent, with the most significant portion of the liabilities having a discount rate for obligations of 4.20 percent or higher. At December 31, 2010, such rates for the Company’s defined-benefit pension plans ranged from 2.30 percent to 5.55 percent, with the most significant portion of the liabilities having a discount rate for obligations of 5.0 percent or higher. The decline in the weighted average discount rate to 4.40 percent over the last several years was principally the result of lower long-term interest rates in the bond markets. The discount rate for obligations for 2009 was based upon the expected duration of each defined-benefit plan’s liabilities matched to the widely used Citigroup Pension Discount Curve and Liability index for December 31, 2009. The weighted average discount rates were also affected by the freezing of all future benefit accruals for substantially all of the Company’s domestic qualified and non-qualified defined-benefit plans, which shortened the period of future payments.

For 2011 and 2010, the Company determined the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 7.25 percent based upon an analysis of expected and historical rates of return of various asset classes utilizing the current and long-term target asset allocation of the plan assets. The projected asset return at both December 31, 2011 and 2010 also considered near term returns, including current market conditions and also that pension assets are long-term in nature. The actual annual rate of return on the Company’s pension plan assets was 3.2 percent and 4.3 percent for the 10-year periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Although these rates of return are less than the Company’s current expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the Company notes that these 10-year periods include two significant declines in the equity markets. Accordingly, the Company believes a 7.25 percent expected long-term rate of return is reasonable.

The investment objectives seek to minimize the volatility of the value of the Company’s plan assets relative to pension liabilities and to ensure plan assets are sufficient to pay plan benefits. In 2010, the Company and its pension investment advisor concluded that the Company should achieve the following targeted asset portfolio: 45 percent equities, 25 percent fixed-income, 15 percent global assets (combination of equity and fixed-income) and 15 percent alternative investments (such as private equity, commodities and hedge funds). The Company achieved its targeted asset portfolio in 2011. The revised asset allocation of the investment portfolio was developed with the objective of achieving the Company’s expected rate of return and reducing volatility of asset returns, and considered the freezing of future benefits. The equity portfolios are invested in individual securities or funds that are expected to mirror broad market returns for equity securities. The fixed-income portfolio is invested in corporate bonds, bond index funds or U.S. Treasury securities. The increased allocation to fixed-income securities partially matches the bond-like and long-term nature of the pension liabilities. It is expected that the alternative investments would have a higher rate of return than the targeted overall long-term return of 7.25 percent. However, these investments are subject to greater volatility, due to their nature, than a portfolio of equities and fixed-income investments, and would be less liquid than financial instruments that trade on public markets. This portfolio is expected to yield a long-term rate of return of 7.25 percent.

The fair value of the Company’s plan assets is subject to risk including significant concentrations of risk in the Company’s plan assets related to equity, interest rate and operating risk. In order to ensure plan assets are sufficient to pay benefits, a portion of plan assets is allocated to equity investments that are expected, over time, to earn higher returns with more volatility than fixed-income

investments which more closely match pension liabilities. Within equity, risk is mitigated by targeting a portfolio that is broadly diversified by geography, market capitalization, manager mandate size, investment style and process.

In order to minimize asset volatility relative to the liabilities, a portion of plan assets are allocated to fixed-income investments that are exposed to interest rate risk. Rate increases generally will result in a decline in fixed-income assets, while reducing the present value of the liabilities. Conversely, rate decreases will increase fixed income assets, partially offsetting the related increase in the liabilities.

Potential events or circumstances that could have a negative effect on estimated fair value include the risks of inadequate diversification and other operating risks. To mitigate these risks, investments are diversified across and within asset classes in support of investment objectives. Policies and practices to address operating risks include ongoing manager oversight, plan and asset class investment guidelines and instructions that are communicated to managers, and periodic compliance and audit reviews to ensure adherence to these policies. In addition, the Company periodically seeks the input of its independent advisor to ensure the investment policy is appropriate.

Other. The Company sponsors certain post-retirement benefit plans that provide medical, dental and life insurance coverage for eligible retirees and dependents in the United States based upon age and length of service. The aggregate present value of the unfunded accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation was $14 million and $13 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Cash Flows. At December 31, 2011, the Company expected to contribute approximately $50 million to its qualified defined-benefit pension plans to meet ERISA requirements in 2012. The Company also expected to pay benefits of $8 million and $11 million to participants of its foreign and non-qualified (domestic) defined-benefit pension plans, respectively, in 2012.

At December 31, 2011, the benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five years, and in aggregate for the five years thereafter, relating to the Company’s defined-benefit pension plans, were as follows, in millions:

In July 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase for retirement of up to 50 million shares of the Company’s common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise. At December 31, 2011, the Company had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 25 million shares. During 2011, the Company repurchased and retired two million shares of Company common stock, for cash aggregating $30 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2011 grant of two million shares of long-term stock awards. The Company repurchased and retired three million common shares in 2010 and two million common shares in 2009 for cash aggregating $45 million and $11 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively.

On the basis of amounts paid (declared), cash dividends per common share were $.30 ($.30) in 2011, $.30 ($.30) in 2010 and $.46 ($.30) in 2009, respectively. In 2009, the Company decreased its quarterly cash dividend to $.075 per common share from $.235 per common share.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income. The components of accumulated other comprehensive income attributable to Masco Corporation were as follows, in millions:

The unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities, net, is reported net of income tax expense of $14 million at both December 31, 2011 and 2010. The unrecognized prior service cost and net loss, net, is reported net of income tax benefit of $100 million and $105 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Cabinets and Related Products – principally includes assembled and ready-to-assemble kitchen and bath cabinets; home office workstations; entertainment centers; storage products; bookcases; and kitchen utility products.

Plumbing Products – principally includes faucets; plumbing fittings and valves; showerheads and hand showers; bathtubs and shower enclosures; and spas.

Installation and Other Services – principally includes the sale, installation and distribution of insulation and other building products.

Decorative Architectural Products – principally includes paints and stains; and cabinet, door, window and other hardware.

Other Specialty Products – principally includes windows, window frame components and patio doors; staple gun tackers, staples and other fastening tools.

The above products and services are sold to the home improvement and new home construction markets through mass merchandisers, hardware stores, home centers, builders, distributors and other outlets for consumers and contractors.

The Company’s operations are principally located in North America and Europe. The Company’s country of domicile is the United States of America.

Corporate assets consist primarily of real property, equipment, cash and cash investments and other investments.

The Company’s segments are based upon similarities in products and services and represent the aggregation of operating units, for which financial information is regularly evaluated by the Company’s corporate operating executives in determining resource allocation and assessing performance and is periodically reviewed by the Board of Directors. Accounting policies for the segments are the same as those for the Company. The Company primarily evaluates performance based upon operating profit (loss) and, other than general corporate expense, allocates specific corporate overhead to each segment. The evaluation of segment operating profit also excludes the charge for defined-benefit plan curtailment, the charge for litigation settlements, the accelerated stock compensation expense and the (loss) on corporate fixed assets, net.

Information about the Company by segment and geographic area was as follows, in millions:

Other, net, which is included in other income (expense), net, was as follows, in millions:

Other items, net, included realized foreign currency transaction gains (losses) of $(5) million, $(2) million and $17 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as well as other miscellaneous items.

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the net deferred tax liability consisted of net short-term deferred tax assets included in prepaid expenses and other of $11 million and $50 million, respectively, and net long-term deferred tax liabilities included in deferred income taxes and other of $250 million and $397 million, respectively.

The current portion of the 2011 state and local income tax benefit includes a $10 million tax benefit from the reversal of an accrual for uncertain tax positions resulting primarily from the expiration of applicable statutes of limitations. The deferred portion of the 2011 state and local taxes includes a $31 million non-cash charge to income tax expense resulting from a change in the valuation allowance against state and local deferred tax assets.

In the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a $372 million valuation allowance against its U.S. Federal deferred tax assets as a non-cash charge to income tax expense. In reaching this conclusion, the Company considered the weaker retail sales of certain of its building products and the slower than anticipated recovery in the U.S. housing market which led to U.S. operating losses and significant U.S. goodwill impairment charges, that primarily occurred in the fourth quarter of 2010, causing the Company to be in a three-year cumulative U.S. loss position. These factors negatively impacted the Company’s ability to utilize tax-planning strategies that included the potential sale of certain non-core operating assets to support the realization of its U.S. Federal deferred tax assets, since current year losses are heavily weighted in determining if sufficient income would exist in the carryforward period to realize the benefit of the strategies.

During 2011, objective and verifiable negative evidence, such as continued U.S. operating losses and significant U.S. goodwill impairment charges, continued to outweigh positive evidence. As a result, the Company recorded an $89 million increase in the valuation allowance against its U.S. Federal deferred tax assets as a non-cash charge to income tax expense.

Recording the valuation allowance does not restrict the Company’s ability to utilize the future deductions and net operating losses associated with the deferred tax assets assuming taxable income is recognized in future periods.

A rebound in the U.S. housing market from the current historic lows and retail sales of building products improving from their current levels should have a positive impact on the Company’s operating results in the U.S. A return to sustained profitability in the U.S. should result in objective positive evidence thereby warranting the potential reversal of all or a portion of the valuation allowance.

The $156 million and $228 million of deferred tax assets at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, for which there is no valuation allowance recorded, is anticipated to be realized through the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences recorded as deferred tax liabilities.

Of the deferred tax asset related to the net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards at December 31, 2011 and 2010, $269 million and $143 million will expire between 2020 and 2031 and $11 million and $5 million is unlimited, respectively.

The tax benefit from certain stock-based compensation is not recognized as a deferred tax asset until the tax deduction reduces cash taxes. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2011, the Company has not recorded a $13 million deferred tax asset on additional net operating losses that, when realized, will be recorded to paid-in capital.

A tax provision has not been provided at December 31, 2011 for U.S. income taxes or additional foreign withholding taxes on approximately $74 million of undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that are considered to be permanently reinvested. It is not practicable to determine the amount of deferred tax liability on such earnings as the actual U.S. tax would depend on income tax laws and circumstances at the time of distribution.

A reconciliation of the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate to the income tax (benefit) expense on (loss) income from continuing operations was as follows:

Income taxes paid were $43 million, $47 million and $25 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for uncertain tax positions, including related interest and penalties, is as follows:

If recognized, $40 million and $47 million of the liability for uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, net of any U.S. Federal tax benefit, would impact the Company’s effective tax rate.

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, $86 and $97 million of the total liability for uncertain tax positions, including related interest and penalties, is recorded in deferred income taxes and other, $1 and $5 million is recorded in accrued liabilities and $6 and $8 million is recorded in other assets, respectively.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction, and various local, state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company continues to participate in the Compliance Assurance Program (“CAP”). CAP is a real-time audit of the U.S. Federal income tax return that allows the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), working in conjunction with the Company, to determine tax return compliance with the U.S. Federal tax law prior to filing the return. This program provides the Company with greater certainty about its tax liability for a given year within months, rather than years, of filing its annual tax return and greatly reduces the need for recording a liability for U.S. Federal uncertain tax positions. The IRS has completed their examination of the Company’s consolidated U.S. Federal tax returns through 2010. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to state or foreign income tax examinations on filed returns for years before 2000.

As a result of tax audit closings, settlements and the expiration of applicable statutes of limitations in various jurisdictions within the next 12 months, the Company anticipates that it is reasonably possible the liability for uncertain tax positions could be reduced by approximately $10 million.

Reconciliations of the numerators and denominators used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share were as follows, in millions:

The Company follows accounting guidance regarding determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. This accounting guidance clarifies that share-based payment awards that entitle their holders to receive non-forfeitable dividends prior to vesting should be considered participating securities. The Company has granted restricted stock awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends on unvested shares; such unvested restricted stock awards are considered participating securities. As participating securities, the unvested shares are required to be included in the calculation of the Company’s basic earnings per common share, using the “two-class method.” The two-class method of computing earnings per common share is an allocation method that calculates earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Unvested restricted stock awards were previously included in the Company’s diluted share calculation using the treasury stock method. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company allocated dividends to the unvested restricted stock awards (participating securities).

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not include any common shares related to the Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes (“Notes”) in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share, as the price of the Company’s common stock at December 31, 2010 and 2009 did not exceed the equivalent accreted value of the Notes.

Additionally, 36 million common shares, 37 million common shares and 36 million common shares for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share due to their antidilutive effect.

Common shares outstanding included on the Company’s balance sheet and for the calculation of earnings per common share do not include unvested stock awards (10 million common shares at both December 31, 2011 and 2010); shares outstanding for legal requirements included all common shares that have voting rights (including unvested stock awards).

Litigation. The Company is subject to lawsuits and pending or asserted claims with respect to matters generally arising in the ordinary course of business.

As previously disclosed, a lawsuit was brought against the Company and a number of its insulation installation companies alleging that certain of their practices violated provisions of the federal antitrust laws. The case was filed in October 2004 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia by Columbus Drywall & Insulation, Inc., Leo Jones Insulation, Inc., Southland Insulators, Inc., Southland Insulators of Maryland, Inc. d/b/a Devere Insulation, Southland Insulators of Delaware LLC d/b/a Delmarva Insulation, and Whitson Insulation Company of Grand Rapids, Inc. against the Company, its subsidiaries Masco Contractors Services Group Corp., Masco Contractor Services Central, Inc. (“MCS Central”) and Masco Contractor Services East, Inc., and several insulation manufacturers (the “Columbus Drywall case”). In February 2009, the court certified a class of 377 insulation contractors. A trial date in this case has been scheduled for July 2012. Another suit filed in March 2003 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia by Wilson Insulation Company, Wilson Insulation of Augusta, Inc. and The Wilson Insulation Group, Inc. against the Company, Masco Contractor Services, Inc., and MCS Central that alleged anticompetitive conduct. This case has been removed from the court’s active docket. In March 2007, Albert Von Der Werth and Valerie Good filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company, its subsidiary Masco Contractor Services, and several insulation manufacturers seeking class action status and alleging anticompetitive conduct. This case was subsequently transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and has been administratively stayed by the court. An additional suit, which was filed in September 2005 and alleged anticompetitive conduct, was dismissed with prejudice in December 2006.

The Company is vigorously defending the Columbus Drywall case. Based upon the advice of its outside counsel, the Company believes that the conduct of the Company and its insulation installation companies, which is the subject of the above-described lawsuits, has not violated any antitrust laws. The Company is unable at this time to reliably estimate any potential liability which might occur from an adverse judgment. There cannot be any assurance that the Company will ultimately prevail in these lawsuits, or, if unsuccessful, that the ultimate liability would not be material and would not have a material adverse effect on its businesses or the methods used by its insulation installation companies in doing business.

Warranty. Certain of the Company’s products and product finishes and services are covered by a warranty to be free from defects in material and workmanship for periods ranging from one year to the life of the product. At the time of sale, the Company accrues a warranty liability for estimated costs to provide products, parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations. The Company’s estimate of costs to service its warranty obligations is based upon historical experience and expectations of future conditions. To the extent that the Company experiences any changes in warranty claim activity or costs associated with servicing those claims, its warranty liability is adjusted accordingly.

Investments. With respect to the Company’s investments in private equity funds, the Company had, at December 31, 2011, commitments to contribute up to $25 million of additional capital to such funds representing the Company’s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date. The Company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund. The Company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur. Capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the Company’s investment in the private equity fund when paid.

Other Matters. The Company enters into contracts, which include reasonable and customary indemnifications that are standard for the industries in which it operates. Such indemnifications include customer claims against builders for issues relating to the Company’s products and workmanship. In conjunction with divestitures and other transactions, the Company occasionally provides reasonable and customary indemnifications relating to various items including: the enforceability of trademarks; legal and environmental issues; provisions for sales returns; and asset valuations. The Company has never had to pay a material amount related to these indemnifications and evaluates the probability that amounts may be incurred and appropriately records an estimated liability when probable.

(Loss) earnings per common share amounts for the four quarters of 2011 and 2010 may not total to the earnings per common share amounts for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 due to the allocation of income to unvested stock awards.

Fourth quarter 2011 loss from continuing operations and net loss include non-cash impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets of $335 million after tax ($494 million pre-tax). Income (loss) from continuing operations and net (loss) income include after-tax gains from financial investments of $11 million ($17 million pre-tax), $21 million ($33 million pre-tax), $13 million ($19 million pre-tax) and $3 million ($4 million pre-tax) in the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively.

Fourth quarter 2010 loss from continuing operations and net loss include non-cash impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets of $586 million after tax ($698 million pre-tax). Fourth quarter 2010 loss from continuing operations and net loss include a valuation allowance on net U.S. deferred tax assets of $372 million. Income (loss) from continuing operations and net (loss) income include after-tax impairment charges for financial investments of $21 million ($33 million pre-tax) and $— million ($1 million pre-tax) in the second and fourth quarters of 2010, respectively.

The Company, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of its disclosure controls and procedures as required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) as of December 31, 2011. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) is included in this Report under Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, under the heading, “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and is incorporated herein by reference. The report of our independent registered public accounting firm is also included under Item 8, under the heading, “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and is incorporated herein by reference.

In connection with the evaluation of the Company’s “internal control over financial reporting” that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2011, which is required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by paragraph (d) of Exchange Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 (as defined in paragraph (f) of Rule 13a-15), management determined that there was no change that materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect internal control over financial reporting.

Our Code of Business Ethics applies to all employees, officers and directors including our Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, and is posted on our website at www.masco.com. Other information required by this Item will be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed on or before April 29, 2012, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.

Information required by this Item will be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed on or before April 29, 2012, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


MASCO CORPORATION

By:		/S/ JOHN G. SZNEWAJS
		John G. Sznewajs
		Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

The Company will furnish to its stockholders a copy of any of the above exhibits not included herein upon the written request of such stockholder and the payment to the Company of the reasonable expenses incurred by the Company in furnishing such copy or copies.


Delaware		38-1794485
(State of Incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
21001 Van Born Road, Taylor, Michigan		48180
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)


Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company ¨
	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)


			(In Millions)
	Net Sales(1)
	2011		2010		2009
Cabinets and Related Products	$	1,231	$	1,464	$	1,674
Plumbing Products		2,913		2,692		2,564
Installation and Other Services		1,077		1,041		1,121
Decorative Architectural Products		1,670		1,693		1,714
Other Specialty Products		576		596		584

Total	$	7,467	$	7,486	$	7,657


	Operating (Loss) Profit (1)(2)(3)(4)
	2011			2010			2009
Cabinets and Related Products	$	(206	)	$	(250	)	$	(64	)
Plumbing Products		322			331			237
Installation and Other Services		(79	)		(798	)		(116	)
Decorative Architectural Products		196			345			375
Other Specialty Products		(401	)		19			(199	)

Total	$	(168	)	$	(353	)	$	233


	Market Price				Dividends Declared
Quarter	High		Low		Dividends Declared
2011
Fourth	$	10.71	$	6.60	$	.075
Third		12.50		6.78		.075
Second		14.43		11.73		.075
First		15.03		12.41		.075

Total					$	.30

2010
Fourth	$	13.54	$	10.46	$	.075
Third		12.05		9.94		.075
Second		18.78		10.74		.075
First		15.75		12.76		.075

Total					$	.30


For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011		Commission File Number 1-5794


Item		Page
	PART I
1.	Business		2
1A.	Risk Factors		8
1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments		13
2.	Properties		14
3.	Legal Proceedings		14
4.	[Removed and Reserved.]		14

	PART II
5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		15
6.	Selected Financial Data		17
7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		18
7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		41
8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		42
9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		90
9A.	Controls and Procedures		90
9B.	Other Information		90

	PART III
10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		91
11.	Executive Compensation		91
12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		91
13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		91
14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services		91

	PART IV
15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule		91
	Signatures		93


Business Segment	Manufacturing		Warehouse and Distribution
Cabinets and Related Products		12		13
Plumbing Products		23		6
Decorative Architectural Products		8		8
Other Specialty Products		10		6

Totals		53		33


Plan Category	Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights		Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights		Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders		36,305,607	$	20.93		8,318,400


	2007		2008		2009		2010		2011
Masco	$	75.39	$	42.06	$	53.92	$	50.60	$	43.09
S&P 500 Index	$	105.48	$	66.93	$	84.28	$	96.78	$	98.81
S&P Industrials Index	$	111.99	$	67.86	$	81.56	$	103.08	$	102.47
S&P Consumer Durables & Apparel Index	$	79.60	$	52.88	$	72.07	$	94.08	$	101.33


	Dollars in Millions (Except Per Common Share Data)
	2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
Net Sales (1)	$	7,467		$	7,486		$	7,657		$	9,338		$	11,251
Operating (loss) profit (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)	$	(295	)	$	(463	)	$	70		$	149		$	1,052
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to Masco Corporation (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)	$	(465	)	$	(1,022	)	$	(130	)	$	(329	)	$	496
Per share of common stock:
(Loss) income from continuing operations:
Basic	$	(1.34	)	$	(2.94	)	$	(.38	)	$	(.95	)	$	1.31
Diluted	$	(1.34	)	$	(2.94	)	$	(.38	)	$	(.95	)	$	1.31
Dividends declared	$	.30		$	.30		$	.30		$	.93		$	.92
Dividends paid	$	.30		$	.30		$	.46		$	.925		$	.91
At December 31:
Total assets	$	7,297		$	8,140		$	9,175		$	9,483		$	10,907
Long-term debt		3,222			4,032			3,604			3,915			3,966
Shareholders’ equity		742			1,582			2,817			2,981			4,142


	Twelve Months Ended December 31
	2011			2010
Net sales, as reported	$	7,467		$	7,486
– Acquisitions		—			—

Net sales, excluding acquisitions		7,467			7,486
– Currency translation		(88	)		—

Net sales, excluding acquisitions and the effect of currency	$	7,379		$	7,486


							Percent Change
	2011		2010		2009		2011 vs. 2010			2010 vs. 2009
Net Sales:
Cabinets and Related Products	$	1,231	$	1,464	$	1,674		(16	)%		(13	)%
Plumbing Products		2,913		2,692		2,564		8	%		5	%
Installation and Other Services		1,077		1,041		1,121		3	%		(7	)%
Decorative Architectural Products		1,670		1,693		1,714		(1	)%		(1	)%
Other Specialty Products		576		596		584		(3	)%		2	%

Total	$	7,467	$	7,486	$	7,657		—	%		(2	)%


North America	$	5,669	$	5,823	$	6,000		(3	)%		(3	)%
International, principally Europe		1,798		1,663		1,657		8	%		—	%

Total	$	7,467	$	7,486	$	7,657		—	%		(2	)%


	2011			2011(B)			2010			2010(B)			2009			2009(B)
Operating Profit (Loss): (A)
Cabinets and Related Products		$(206	)		$(162	)		$(250	)		$(250	)	$	(64	)		$ (64	)
Plumbing Products		322			323			331			332			237			276
Installation and Other Services		(79	)		(79	)		(798	)		(101	)		(116	)		(116	)
Decorative Architectural Products		196			271			345			345			375			375
Other Specialty Products		(401	)		(27	)		19			19			(199	)		24

Total		$(168	)		$ 326			$(353	)		$ 345		$	233			$495


North America		$(259	)		$ 191			$(507	)		$191			$108			$331
International, principally Europe		91			135			154			154			125			164

Total		(168	)		326			(353	)		345			233			495
General corporate expense, net		(118	)		(118	)		(110	)		(110	)		(140	)		(140	)
Charge for defined-benefit curtailment		—			—			—			—			(8	)		(8	)
Charge for litigation settlements		(9	)		(9	)		—			—			(7	)		(7	)
Accelerated stock compensation expense		—			—			—			—			(6	)		(6	)
Loss on corporate fixed assets, net		—			—			—			—			(2	)		(2	)

Total operating profit (loss)		$(295	)		$ 199			$(463	)		$ 235			$ 70			$332


	2011			2011(B)			2010			2010(B)			2009			2009(B)
Operating Profit (Loss) Margin: (A)
Cabinets and Related Products		(16.7	)%		(13.2	)%		(17.1	)%		(17.1	)%		(3.8	)%		(3.8)%
Plumbing Products		11.1	%		11.1	%		12.3	%		12.3	%		9.2	%		10.8 %
Installation and Other Services		(7.3	)%		(7.3	)%		(76.7	)%		(9.7	)%		(10.3	)%		(10.3)%
Decorative Architectural Products		11.7	%		16.2	%		20.4	%		20.4	%		21.9	%		21.9 %
Other Specialty Products		(69.6	)%		(4.7	)%		3.2	%		3.2	%		(34.1	)%		4.1 %
North America		(4.6	)%		3.4	%		(8.7	)%		3.3	%		1.8	%		5.5 %
International, principally Europe		5.1	%		7.5	%		9.3	%		9.3	%		7.5	%		9.9 %
Total		(2.2	)%		4.4	%		(4.7	)%		4.6	%		3.0	%		6.5 %
Total operating profit (loss) margin, as reported		(4.0	)%		N/A			(6.2	)%		N/A			.9	%		N/A


	Payments Due by Period
	Less than 1 Year		2-3 Years		4-5 Years		More than 5 Years		Other(D)		Total
Debt (A)	$	803	$	201	$	1,502	$	1,519	$	—	$	4,025
Interest (A)		228		386		325		721		—		1,660
Operating leases		68		79		53		63		—		263
Currently payable income taxes		18		—		—		—		—		18
Private equity funds (B)		13		12		—		—		—		25
Purchase commitments (C)		238		10		—		—		—		248
Uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties (D)		1		—		—		—		80		81

Total	$	1,369	$	688	$	1,880	$	2,303	$	80	$	6,320


(In Millions, Except Share Data)
	2011		2010
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash investments	$	1,656	$	1,715
Receivables		914		888
Inventories		769		732
Prepaid expenses and other		70		129
Assets held for sale		20		—

Total current assets		3,429		3,464
Property and equipment, net		1,567		1,737
Goodwill		1,891		2,383
Other intangible assets, net		196		269
Other assets		209		287
Assets held for sale		5		—

Total Assets	$	7,297	$	8,140

LIABILITIES and EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	770	$	602
Notes payable		803		66
Accrued liabilities		782		819
Liabilities held for sale		8		—

Total current liabilities		2,363		1,487

Long-term debt		3,222		4,032
Deferred income taxes and other		970		1,039

Total Liabilities		6,555		6,558

Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Masco Corporation’s shareholders’ equity Common shares authorized: 1,400,000,000; issued and outstanding: 2011 – 347,900,000; 2010 – 348,600,000		348		349
Preferred shares authorized: 1,000,000; issued and outstanding: 2011 and 2010 – None		—		—
Paid-in capital		65		42
Retained earnings		38		720
Accumulated other comprehensive income		76		273

Total Masco Corporation’s shareholders’ equity		527		1,384
Noncontrolling interest		215		198

Total Equity		742		1,582

Total Liabilities and Equity	$	7,297	$	8,140


(In Millions, Except Per Common Share Data)
	2011			2010			2009
Net sales	$	7,467		$	7,486		$	7,657
Cost of sales		5,683			5,653			5,647

Gross profit		1,784			1,833			2,010
Selling, general and administrative expenses		1,585			1,598			1,678
Impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets		494			698			262

Operating (loss) profit		(295	)		(463	)		70

Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense		(254	)		(251	)		(225	)
Impairment charges for financial investments		—			(34	)		(10	)
Other, net		77			7			29

		(177	)		(278	)		(206	)

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(472	)		(741	)		(136	)
Income tax (benefit) expense		(49	)		240			(44	)

Loss from continuing operations		(423	)		(981	)		(92	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net		(110	)		(21	)		(53	)

Net loss		(533	)		(1,002	)		(145	)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		42			41			38

Net loss attributable to Masco Corporation	$	(575	)	$	(1,043	)	$	(183	)

Loss per common share attributable to Masco Corporation:
Basic:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(1.34	)	$	(2.94	)	$	(.38	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net		(.32	)		(.06	)		(.15	)

Net loss	$	(1.66	)	$	(3.00	)	$	(.53	)

Diluted:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(1.34	)	$	(2.94	)	$	(.38	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net		(.32	)		(.06	)		(.15	)

Net loss	$	(1.66	)	$	(3.00	)	$	(.53	)

Amounts attributable to Masco Corporation:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(465	)	$	(1,022	)	$	(130	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net		(110	)		(21	)		(53	)

Net loss	$	(575	)	$	(1,043	)	$	(183	)


													(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)
	Total			Common Shares ($1 par value)			Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Noncontrolling Interest
Balance, January 1, 2009	$	2,981		$	351		$	—		$	2,162		$	308		$	160
Net (loss) income		(145	)								(183	)					38
Cumulative translation adjustments		28												22			6
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of income tax of $13		22												22
Unrecognized prior service cost and net loss, net of income tax benefit of $20		14												14

Total comprehensive loss		(81	)
Shares issued		1			2			(1	)
Shares retired:
Repurchased		(11	)		(2	)		(9	)
Surrendered (non-cash)		(5	)		(1	)		(4	)
Cash dividends declared		(108	)								(108	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest		(16	)														(16	)
Stock-based compensation		56						56

Balance, December 31, 2009	$	2,817		$	350		$	42		$	1,871		$	366		$	188

Net (loss) income		(1,002	)								(1,043	)					41
Cumulative translation adjustments		(57	)											(41	)		(16	)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of income tax of $—		1												1
Unrecognized prior service cost and net loss, net of income tax of $—		(53	)											(53	)

Total comprehensive loss		(1,111	)
Shares issued		—			2			(2	)
Shares retired:
Repurchased		(45	)		(3	)		(42	)
Surrendered (non-cash)		(6	)					(6	)
Cash dividends declared		(108	)								(108	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest		(15	)														(15	)
Stock-based compensation		50						50

Balance, December 31, 2010	$	1,582		$	349		$	42		$	720		$	273		$	198

Net (loss) income		(533	)								(575	)					42
Cumulative translation adjustments		(30	)											(23	)		(7	)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of income tax of $—		(38	)											(38	)
Unrealized (loss) on interest rate swaps, Net of income tax of $—		(23	)											(23	)
Unrecognized prior service cost and net loss, net of income tax of $5		(113	)											(113	)

Total comprehensive loss		(737	)
Shares issued		—			2			(2	)
Shares retired:
Repurchased		(30	)		(2	)		(28	)
Surrendered (non-cash)		(8	)		(1	)		(7	)
Cash dividends declared		(107	)								(107	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest		(18	)														(18	)
Stock-based compensation		60						60

Balance, December 31, 2011	$	742		$	348		$	65		$	38		$	76		$	215


	(In Millions)
	At December 31
	2011		2010
Finished goods	$	390	$	393
Raw material		280		246
Work in process		99		93

Total	$	769	$	732


			Pre-tax
	Cost Basis		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Recorded Basis
December 31, 2011	$	19	$	3	$	—	$	22
December 31, 2010	$	22	$	40	$	—	$	62


			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Dec. 31, 2011		Quoted Market Prices (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Auction rate securities	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	22

Total	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	22


			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Dec. 31, 2010		Quoted Market Prices (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
TriMas Corporation	$	40	$	40	$	—	$	—
Auction rate securities		22		—		—		22

Total	$	62	$	40	$	—	$	22


	Auction Rate Securities
Fair value January 1, 2011	$	22
Total losses included in earnings
Unrealized losses		—
Purchases, issuances, settlements		—
Transfers from Level 3 to Level 2		—

Fair value at December 31, 2011	$	22


	Asahi Tec Preferred Stock			Auction Rate Securities		Total
Fair value January 1, 2010	$	71		$	22	$	93
Total losses included in earnings		(28	)		—		(28	)
Unrealized losses		(23	)		—		(23	)
Purchases, issuances, settlements		—			—		—
Transfers from Level 3 to Level 2		(20	)		—		(20	)

Fair value at December 31, 2010	$	—		$	22	$	22


	Twelve Months Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
Foreign Currency Contracts
Exchange Contracts	$	3		$	3		$	(12	)
Forward Contracts		3			(2	)		(3	)
Metal Contracts		(7	)		7			—

Total (loss) gain	$	(1	)	$	8		$	(15	)


	At December 31, 2011
	Notional Amount		Assets		Liabilities
Foreign exchange contracts
Exchange Contracts	$	108
Current assets			$	8	$	—
Foreign Forward Contracts		76
Current assets				1		—
Current liabilities				1		2
Metal Contracts		67
Current assets				2		—
Current liabilities				—		4

Total	$	251	$	12	$	6


	At December 31, 2010
	Notional Amount		Assets		Liabilities
Foreign exchange contracts
Exchange Contracts	$	94
Current assets			$	—	$	4
Foreign Contracts		47
Current liabilities				—		3
Metal Contracts		22
Current assets				8		1

Total	$	163	$	8	$	8


	Gross Goodwill At December 31, 2011		Accumulated Impairment Losses			Net Goodwill At December 31, 2011
Cabinets and Related Products	$	589	$	(408	)	$	181
Plumbing Products		541		(340	)		201
Installation and Other Services		1,806		(762	)		1,044
Decorative Architectural Products		294		(75	)		219
Other Specialty Products		980		(734	)		246

Total	$	4,210	$	2,319		$	1,891


	Gross Goodwill At December 31, 2010		Accumulated Impairment Losses			Net Goodwill At December 31, 2010		Additions(A)		Discontinued Operations(B)			Pre-tax Impairment Charge			Other(C)			Net Goodwill At December 31, 2011
Cabinets and Related Products	$	587	$	(364	)	$	223	$	—	$	—		$	(44	)	$	2		$	181
Plumbing Products		536		(340	)		196		9		—			—			(4	)		201
Installation and Other Services		1,819		(762	)		1,057		—		(13	)		—			—			1,044
Decorative Architectural Products		294		—			294		—		—			(75	)		—			219
Other Specialty Products		980		(367	)		613		—		—			(367	)		—			246

Total	$	4,216	$	(1,833	)	$	2,383	$	9	$	(13	)	$	(486	)	$	(2	)	$	1,891


	Gross Goodwill At December 31, 2009		Accumulated Impairment Losses			Net Goodwill At December 31, 2009		Additions(A)		Discontinued Operations(B)			Pre-tax Impairment Charge			Other(C)			Net Goodwill At December 31, 2010
Cabinets and Related Products	$	590	$	(364	)	$	226	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	(3	)	$	223
Plumbing Products		547		(340	)		207		—		—			—			(11	)		196
Installation and Other Services		1,819		(51	)		1,768		—		(14	)		(697	)		—			1,057
Decorative Architectural Products		294		—			294		—		—			—			—			294
Other Specialty Products		980		(367	)		613		—		—			—			—			613

Total	$	4,230	$	(1,122	)	$	3,108	$	—	$	(14	)	$	(697	)	$	(14	)	$	2,383


Option Shares Outstanding							Option Shares Exercisable
Range of Prices	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Remaining Option Term		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$ 8-23		20		7 Years	$	14		9	$	16
$24-28		6		3 Years	$	27		6	$	27
$29-32		10		4 Years	$	30		9	$	30
$33-38		—		3 Years	$	34		—	$	34

$ 8-38		36		5 Years	$	21		24	$	25


	Phantom Stock Awards At December 31,				Stock Appreciation Rights At December 31,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Accrued compensation cost liability	$	7	$	6	$	3	$	5
Unrecognized compensation cost	$	4	$	5	$	1	$	2
Equivalent common shares		1		1		2		2


	2011						2010
	Qualified			Non-Qualified			Qualified			Non-Qualified
	Qualified			Non-Qualified			Qualified			Non-Qualified
Changes in projected benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at January 1	$	868		$	163		$	806		$	152
Service cost		2			—			3			—
Interest cost		44			8			45			9
Participant contributions		—			—			1			—
Actuarial loss (gain), net		70			13			61			12
Foreign currency exchange		(2	)		—			(10	)		—
Recognized curtailment loss		—			—			(1	)		—
Benefit payments		(39	)		(10	)		(37	)		(10	)

Projected benefit obligation at December 31	$	943		$	174		$	868		$	163

Changes in fair value of plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at January 1	$	509		$	—		$	474		$	—
Actual return on plan assets		(1	)		—			46			—
Foreign currency exchange		—			—			(3	)		—
Company contributions		38			10			31			10
Participant contributions		—			—			1			—
Expenses, other		(3	)		—			(3	)		—
Benefit payments		(39	)		(10	)		(37	)		(10	)

Fair value of plan assets at December 31	$	504		$	—		$	509		$	—

Funded status at December 31:	$	(439	)	$	(174	)	$	(359	)	$	(163	)


	Assets at Fair Value as of December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Common and preferred stocks	$	173	$	47	$	—	$	220
Limited Partnerships		—		—		67		67
Corporate debt securities		—		72		1		73
Government and other debt securities		62		61		1		124
Common collective trust Fund		—		7		—		7
Short-term and other investments		—		—		13		13

Total assets at fairvalue	$	235	$	187	$	82	$	504


	Assets at Fair Value as of December 31, 2010
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Common and preferred stocks	$	258	$	19	$	—	$	277
Limited Partnerships		—		—		64		64
Corporate debt securities		30		—		—		30
Government and other debt securities		61		57		—		118
Common collective trust fund		—		7		—		7
Short-term and other investments		4		—		9		13

Total assets at fair value	$	353	$	83	$	73	$	509


	Year Ended December 31, 2011		Year Ended December 31, 2010
Balance, beginning of year	$	73	$	52
Purchases, sales, issuancesand settlements (net)		9		21
Unrealized losses		—		—

Balance, end of year		82		73


	December 31
	2011		2010		2009
Discount rate for obligations		4.40%		5.30%		5.80%
Expected return on plan assets		7.25%		7.25%		8.00%
Rate of compensation increase		—%		1.00%		2.00%
Discount rate for net periodic pension cost		5.30%		5.80%		6.10%