XML 62 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
9 Months Ended
Apr. 30, 2015
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Analogic has goodwill balances of $57.4 million and $57.0 million at April 30, 2015 and July 31, 2014, respectively. The difference between the two periods relates to goodwill associated with the acquisition of Pathfinder of $0.4 million. The business acquired from Pathfinder is included under our Security and Detection segment. Please refer to Note 3. Business Combinations for more information on the acquisition of Pathfinder.

 

Intangible assets

Intangible assets include the value assigned to intellectual property and other technology, patents, customer contracts and relationships, and trade names. The estimated useful lives for all of these intangible assets, excluding a trade name determined to have an indefinite life, range between 1 to 14 years. Intangible assets are summarized as follows:

 

            As of April 30, 2015      As of July 31, 2014  
(in millions)    Weighted
Average
Amortization
Period
     Cost      Accumulated
Amortization
     Net      Cost      Accumulated
Amortization
     Net  

Developed technologies

     10 years       $ 30.3       $ 11.5       $ 18.8       $ 29.6       $ 9.0       $ 20.6   

Customer relationships

     13 years         44.2         19.1         25.1         43.9         15.1         28.8   

Trade names*

     3 years         8.6         0.8         7.8         8.5         0.5         8.0   

Total intangible assets

            $ 83.1       $ 31.4       $ 51.7       $ 82.0       $ 24.6       $ 57.4   

 

* - $7.6 million of trade names are non-amortizable as of April 30, 2015 and July 31, 2014.

Amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets was $2.2 million and $6.6 million for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2015, respectively. Amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets was $1.9 million and $5.7 million for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2014, respectively.

The estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is expected to be as follows:

 

(in millions)    Estimated
Future
Amortization
Expense
 

2015 (remaining three months)

   $ 2.2   

2016

     8.0   

2017

     7.2   

2018

     6.2   

2019

     5.0   

Thereafter

     15.5   
  

 

 

 
   $ 44.1   
  

 

 

 

We performed the annual impairment test for our goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives as of December 31, 2014. The Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value and as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the qualitative impairment test. Alternatively, we may elect to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed to the two-step quantitative impairment test. Our quantitative impairment assessment considered both the market approach and income approach to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit, with different probabilities assigned to each. Under the market approach, the fair value of the reporting unit is based on trading multiples and a control premium, which was determined based on an analysis of control premiums for recent relevant acquisitions. Under the income approach, the fair value of the reporting unit is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. The income approach is dependent on a number of significant management assumptions including estimates of future sales, future gross margin and operating margin percentages, and discount rates. We determined that the fair values of our reporting units were in excess of their carrying values, and concluded that there was no impairment.

We compared the fair value of a trade name that has an indefinite life using the relief from royalty approach to its carrying value as of December 31, 2014. The relief from royalty approach utilized an after-tax royalty rate and a discount rate. The after-tax royalty rate was determined based on royalty research and margin analysis while the discount rate was determined after consideration of market rates of return on debt and equity capital, the weighted average return on invested capital and the risk associated with achieving forecasted sales for the trade name. We determined that the fair value of the trade name was in excess of its carrying value.