XML 103 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Goodwill and intangible assets
12 Months Ended
Jul. 31, 2014
Goodwill and intangible assets

10. Goodwill and intangible assets

Goodwill

The carrying value of our goodwill at July 31, 2014 and 2013 was $57.0 million and $50.1 million, respectively. The difference between the two periods relates to goodwill associated with the acquisition of PocketSonics of $6.9 million. Upon the acquisition of PocketSonics, we recorded goodwill of $2.8 million, representing the value of the opportunity of further strengthening our competitive position. The goodwill associated with the acquisition was increased by an additional $4.1 million for the deferred tax liability on the IPR&D, recorded at PocketSonics. Please refer to Note 3. Business Combinations for more information on the acquisition of PocketSonics.

The total amount of goodwill expected to be deductible for tax purposes was $3.7 million, for both fiscal years 2014 and 2013.

 

Intangible assets

Intangible assets include the value assigned to intellectual property and other technology, patents, customer contracts and relationships, trade names, and in-process research and development. The estimated useful lives for all of these intangible assets, excluding trade names and in-process research and development, as these are considered to have an indefinite life, are between 1 to 14 years. The carrying values of our indefinite lived intangible assets were $7.6 million and $9.5 million at July 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Intangible assets at July 31, 2014 and 2013 consisted of the following:

 

         July 31, 2014      July 31, 2013  
(in millions)    Weighted-Average
Amortization Period
  Cost      Accumulated
Amortization
     Net      Cost      Accumulated
Amortization
     Net  

Developed technologies

   10 years   $  29.6       $ 9.0       $ 20.6       $ 18.1       $ 6.6       $ 11.5   

Customer relationships

   13 years     43.9         15.1         28.8         43.9         10.2         33.7   

Trade names

   3 years*     8.5         0.5         8.0         8.5         0.1         8.4   

In-process research and development

   —       —           —           —           1.9         —           1.9   
                                                           

Total intangible assets

     $ 82.0       $ 24.6       $ 57.4       $ 72.4       $ 16.9       $ 55.5   
                                                           

 

* $7.6 Million of Trade names are Non-Amortizable

Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $7.8 million, $4.1 million, and $3.1 million for fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The estimated future amortization expenses related to intangible assets for succeeding fiscal years is expected to be as follows:

 

(in millions)       

2015

   $ 8.7   

2016

     7.8   

2017

     7.1   

2018

     6.1   

2019

     4.9   

Thereafter

     15.2   
          
   $ 49.8   
          

We performed the annual impairment test for our goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives as of December 31, 2013. The goodwill as of December 31, 2013 relates to our acquisitions of Copley Controls in April 2008, Ultrasonix in March 2013 and PocketSonics in September 2013. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we elected to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceeded to step one of the impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting units to their carrying values. The goodwill from the acquisition of Copley Controls, of $1.9 million, is included in our OEM reporting unit under the Medical Imaging segment. For purposes of assessing our annual impairment, the goodwill from the acquisitions of Ultrasonix and PocketSonics, of $55.1 million, is included in our Ultrasound reporting unit. Our impairment assessment considered both the market approach and income approach with different probabilities assigned to each. Under the market approach, the fair value of the reporting unit is based on trading multiples and a control premium, which was determined based on an analysis of control premiums for recent relevant acquisitions. Under the income approach, the fair value of the reporting unit is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. The income approach is dependent on a number of significant management assumptions including estimates of future sales, future gross margin percentage, and discount rates. We determined that the fair values of the OEM and Ultrasound reporting units were in excess of their carrying values, and therefore it was not necessary for us to perform step two of the impairment test.

We compared the fair value of the Copley tradename using the relief from royalty approach to its carrying value as of December 31, 2013. The relief from royalty approach utilized an after-tax royalty rate and a discount rate. The after-tax royalty rate was determined based on royalty research and margin analysis while the discount rate was determined after consideration of market rates of return on debt and equity capital, the weighted average return on invested capital and the risk associated with achieving forecasted sales for the Copley tradename. We determined that the fair value of the Copley tradename was in excess of its carrying value.

Our IPR&D asset arises from our acquisition of PocketSonics. We determined the fair value of the IPR&D using a probability-adjusted cash flow model. We compared the fair value of the IPR&D using the income approach to its carrying value at December 31, 2013 and determined there was no impairment. In May 2014, the IPR&D was completed and we performed a qualitative assessment and determined that there was no impairment. Accordingly, the carrying amount of the IPR&D asset of $11.5 million was reclassified as developed technology and will be amortized over its estimated useful life of 10 years. We expect to utilize this IPR&D asset in our Ultrasound segment.

The current economic environment and the uncertainties regarding its impact on our business and our estimates for forecasted revenue and spending levels, made for purposes of our goodwill and trade name impairment testing during the second quarter of fiscal year 2014 may not be accurate predictions of the future. If our assumptions regarding forecasted revenue or margin growth rates of the reporting unit and trade name are not achieved, we may be required to record an impairment charge for the goodwill and trade name in future periods, whether in connection with our next annual impairment testing in the second quarter of the fiscal year ending July 31, 2015, or prior to that if any such change constitutes a triggering event outside of the quarter from when the annual goodwill and trade name impairment test is performed. It is not possible at this time to determine if any such future impairment charge would result or, if it does, whether such charge would be material.