XML 26 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
H.Fair Value Measurements

The Company measures financial and non-financial assets and liabilities at fair value in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  These measurements involve various valuation techniques and assume that the transactions would occur between market participants in the most advantageous market for the Company. 

Fair Value Hierarchy

GAAP defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. GAAP emphasizes that fair value is intended to be a market-based measurement, as opposed to a transaction-specific measurement.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions.  Depending on the nature of the asset or liability, various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate the fair value. Assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from three levels of the fair value hierarchy, as follows:

Level 1.Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market is defined as a market in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2.Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in less active markets, or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated with observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs also include non-binding market consensus prices that can be corroborated with observable market data, as well as quoted prices that were adjusted for security-specific restrictions.

Level 3.Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of assets or liabilities. Level 3 inputs also include non-binding market consensus prices or non-binding broker quotes that we were unable to corroborate with observable market data.

The following is a summary of valuation techniques utilized by the Company for its significant financial and non-financial assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

Assets

To estimate the fair value of its equity and U.S. Treasury securities (Level 1), the Company obtains current market pricing from quoted market sources or uses pricing for identical securities. Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands).

  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
  
Total
June 30, 2016
 
Equity securities 
 
$
50
  
$
  
$
  
$
50
 
U.S. Treasury securities (cash equivalents)
 
$
4,093
  
$
  
$
  
$
4,093
 

  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
  
Total
December 31, 2015
 
Equity securities 
 
$
56
  
$
  
$
  
$
56
 
U.S. Treasury securities (cash equivalents)
 
$
4,089
  
$
  
$
  
$
4,089
 

There were no transfers from level 2 to level 3 during the period. There were no level 2 or 3 assets as of June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

The Company also has assets that may be subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis, including goodwill and intangible assets, and other long-lived assets. The Company reviews the carrying value of these assets whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may not be recoverable. If it is determined that the assets are impaired, the carrying value would be reduced to estimated fair value.