UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014.

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-303

THE KROGER CO.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Ohio		31-0345740
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH		45202
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (513) 762-4000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock $1 par value		New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

NONE

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes x

No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes o

No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x

No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x

No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§299.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	o	Smaller reporting company	o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o

No x

The aggregate market value of the Common Stock of The Kroger Co. held by non-affiliates as of August 17, 2013: $19.8 billion. There were 510,765,637 shares of Common Stock ($1 par value) outstanding as of March 28, 2014.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Portions of the proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act on or before June 2, 2014, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

PART I

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements about our future performance. These statements are based on management’s assumptions and beliefs in light of the information currently available that involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors, including the risks and other factors discussed in “Risk Factors” and “Outlook” below, that could cause actual results and outcomes to differ materially from any future results or outcomes expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Such statements are indicated by words such as “comfortable,” “committed,” “will,” “expect,” “goal,” “should,” “intend,” “target,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” and similar words or phrases. Moreover, statements in Risk Factors, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (“MD&A”), “Outlook,” and elsewhere in this report that speculate about future events are forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

The Kroger Co. (the “Company”) was founded in 1883 and incorporated in 1902. As of February 1, 2014, the Company was one of the largest retailers in the world based on annual sales. The Company also manufactures and processes some of the food for sale in its supermarkets. The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 1014 Vine Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, and its telephone number is (513) 762-4000. The Company maintains a web site (www.thekrogerco.com) that includes additional information about the Company. The Company makes available through its web site, free of charge, its annual reports on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, its current reports on Form 8-K and its interactive data files, including amendments. These forms are available as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company has filed them with, or furnished them electronically to, the SEC.

The Company’s revenues are earned and cash is generated as consumer products are sold to customers in its stores. The Company earns income predominantly by selling products at price levels that produce revenues in excess of its costs to make these products available to its customers. Such costs include procurement and distribution costs, facility occupancy and operational costs, and overhead expenses. The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. All references to 2013, 2012 and 2011 are to the fiscal years ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively, unless specifically indicated otherwise.

EMPLOYEES

As of February 1, 2014, the Company employed approximately 375,000 full- and part-time employees. A majority of the Company’s employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements negotiated with local unions affiliated with one of several different international unions. There are approximately 300 such agreements, usually with terms of three to five years.

STORES

As of February 1, 2014, the Company operated, either directly or through its subsidiaries, 2,640 supermarkets and multi-department stores, 1,240 of which had fuel centers. Approximately 45% of these supermarkets were operated in Company-owned facilities, including some Company-owned buildings on leased land. The Company’s current strategy emphasizes self-development and ownership of store real estate. The Company’s stores operate under several banners that have strong local ties and brand recognition. Supermarkets are generally operated under one of the following formats: combination food and drug stores (“combo stores”); multi-department stores; marketplace stores; or price impact warehouses.

The combo stores are the primary food store format. They typically draw customers from a 2 — 2½ mile radius. The Company believes this format is successful because the stores are large enough to offer the specialty departments that customers desire for one-stop shopping, including natural food and organic sections, pharmacies, general merchandise, pet centers and high-quality perishables such as fresh seafood and organic produce.

Multi-department stores are significantly larger in size than combo stores. In addition to the departments offered at a typical combo store, multi-department stores sell a wide selection of general merchandise items such as apparel, home fashion and furnishings, electronics, automotive products, toys and fine jewelry.

Marketplace stores are smaller in size than multi-department stores. They offer full-service grocery, pharmacy and health and beauty care departments as well as an expanded perishable offering and general merchandise area that includes apparel, home goods and toys.

Price impact warehouse stores offer a “no-frills, low cost” warehouse format and feature everyday low prices plus promotions for a wide selection of grocery and health and beauty care items. Quality meat, dairy, baked goods and fresh produce items provide a competitive advantage. The average size of a price impact warehouse store is similar to that of a combo store.

In addition to the supermarkets, as of February 1, 2014, the Company operated through subsidiaries 786 convenience stores and 320 fine jewelry stores. All 144 of our fine jewelry stores located in malls are operated in leased locations. In addition, 83 convenience stores were operated by franchisees through franchise agreements. Approximately 54% of the convenience stores operated by subsidiaries were operated in Company-owned facilities. The convenience stores offer a limited assortment of staple food items and general merchandise and, in most cases, sell gasoline.

SEGMENTS

The Company operates retail food and drug stores, multi-department stores, jewelry stores, and convenience stores throughout the United States. The Company’s retail operations, which represent over 99% of the Company’s consolidated sales and EBITDA, are its only reportable segment. The Company’s retail operating divisions have been aggregated into one reportable segment due to the operating divisions having similar economic characteristics with similar long-term financial performance. In addition, the Company’s operating divisions offer to its customers similar products, have similar distribution methods, operate in similar regulatory environments, purchase the majority of the Company’s merchandise for retail sale from similar (and in many cases identical) vendors on a coordinated basis from a centralized location, serve similar types of customers, and are allocated capital from a centralized location. The Company’s operating divisions reflect the manner in which the business is managed and how the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer, who act as the Company’s chief operating decision makers, assess performance internally. All of the Company’s operations are domestic. Revenues, profit and losses and total assets are shown in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 below.

MERCHANDISING AND MANUFACTURING

Corporate brand products play an important role in the Company’s merchandising strategy. Our supermarkets, on average, stock approximately 13,000 private label items. The Company’s corporate brand products are primarily produced and sold in three “tiers.” Private Selection is the premium quality brand designed to be a unique item in a category or to meet or beat the “gourmet” or “upscale” brands. The “banner brand” (Kroger, Ralphs, King Soopers, etc.), which represents the majority of the Company’s private label items, is designed to satisfy customers with quality products. Before Kroger will carry a banner brand product we must be satisfied that the product quality meets our customers’ expectations in taste and efficacy, and we guarantee it. Kroger Value is the value brand, designed to deliver good quality at a very affordable price. In addition, the Company continues to grow its other brands, including Simple Truth and Simple Truth Organic. Both Simple Truth and Simple Truth Organic are free from 101 artificial preservatives and ingredients that customers have told us they do not want in their food, and the Simple Truth Organic products are USDA certified organic.

Approximately 40% of the corporate brand units sold are produced in the Company’s manufacturing plants; the remaining corporate brand items are produced to the Company’s strict specifications by outside manufacturers. The Company performs a “make or buy” analysis on corporate brand products and decisions are based upon a comparison of market-based transfer prices versus open market purchases. As of February 1, 2014, the Company operated 38 manufacturing plants. These plants consisted of 18 dairies, nine deli or bakery plants, five grocery product plants, two beverage plants, two meat plants and two cheese plants.

SEASONALITY

The majority of our revenues are generally not seasonal in nature. However, revenues tend to be higher during the major holidays throughout the year.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The disclosure regarding executive officers is set forth in Item 10 of Part III of this Form 10-K under the heading “Executive Officers of the Company,” and is incorporated herein by reference.

COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT

For the disclosure related to the Company’s competitive environment, see Item 1A under the heading “Competitive Environment.”

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

There are risks and uncertainties that can affect our business. The significant risk factors are discussed below. Please also see the “Outlook” section in Item 7 of this Form 10-K for forward-looking statements and factors that could cause us not to realize our goals or meet our expectations.

COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT

The operating environment for the food retailing industry continues to be characterized by intense price competition, aggressive supercenter expansion, increasing fragmentation of retail formats, entry of non-traditional competitors and market consolidation. We have developed a strategic plan that we believe provides a balanced approach that will enable Kroger to meet the wide-ranging needs and expectations of our customers in this challenging economic environment. However, the nature and extent to which our competitors implement various pricing and promotional activities in response to increasing competition, including our execution of our strategic plan, and our response to these competitive actions, can adversely affect our profitability. Our profitability and growth have been, and could continue to be, adversely affected by changes in the overall economic environment that affect consumer spending, including discretionary spending.

PRODUCT SAFETY

Customers count on Kroger to provide them with safe food and drugs, and other merchandise. Concerns regarding the safety of the products that Kroger sells could cause shoppers to avoid purchasing certain products from us, or to seek alternative sources of supply even if the basis for the concern is outside of our control. Any lost confidence on the part of our customers would be difficult and costly to reestablish. Any issue regarding the safety of items sold by Kroger, regardless of the cause, could have a substantial and adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

LABOR RELATIONS

A majority of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements with unions, and our relationship with those unions, including a prolonged work stoppage affecting a substantial number of locations, could have a material adverse effect on our results.

We are a party to approximately 300 collective bargaining agreements. We have various labor agreements that will be negotiated in 2014, covering store employees in Cincinnati, Atlanta, Southern California, New Mexico, Richmond/Hampton Roads, West Virginia and Arizona, and an agreement with Teamsters covering several distribution and manufacturing facilities. Upon the expiration of our collective bargaining agreements, work stoppages by the affected workers could occur if we are unable to negotiate new contracts with labor unions. A prolonged work stoppage affecting a substantial number of locations could have a material adverse effect on our results. Further, if we are unable to control health care, pension and wage costs, or if we have insufficient operational flexibility under our collective bargaining agreements, we may experience increased operating costs and an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

STRATEGY EXECUTION

Our strategy focuses on improving our customers’ shopping experiences through improved service, product quality and selection and price. Successful execution of this strategy requires a balance between sales growth and earnings growth. Maintaining this strategy requires the ability to develop and execute plans to generate cost savings and productivity improvements that can be invested in the merchandising and pricing initiatives necessary to support our customer-focused programs, as well as recognizing and implementing organizational changes as required. If we are unable to execute our plans, or if our plans fail to meet our customers’ expectations, our sales and earnings growth could be adversely affected.

DATA AND TECHNOLOGY

Our business is increasingly dependent on information technology systems that are complex and vital to continuing operations. If we were to experience difficulties maintaining existing systems or implementing new systems, we could incur significant losses due to disruptions in our operations.

Through our sales and marketing activities, we collect and store some personal information that our customers provide to us. We also gather and retain information about our associates in the normal course of business. Under certain circumstances, we may share information with vendors that assist us in conducting our business, as required by law, or with the permission of the individual. Although we have implemented procedures to protect our information, we cannot be certain that all of our systems are entirely free from vulnerability to attack. Computer hackers may attempt to penetrate our or our vendors’ network security and, if successful, misappropriate confidential customer or business information. In addition, a Kroger associate, or a contractor or other third party with whom we do business may attempt to circumvent our security measures in order to obtain information or inadvertently cause a breach involving information. Loss of customer or business information could disrupt our operations, damage our reputation, and expose us to claims from customers, financial institutions, regulatory authorities, payment card associations, associates, and other persons, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, compliance with tougher privacy and information security laws and standards may result in significant expense due to increased investment in technology and the development of new operational processes.

INDEBTEDNESS

As of year-end 2013, Kroger’s outstanding indebtedness, including capital leases and financing obligations, totaled approximately $11.3 billion. This indebtedness could reduce our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, acquisitions or other purposes and could make us vulnerable to future economic downturns as well as competitive pressures. If debt markets do not permit us to refinance certain maturing debt, we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness. Changes in our credit ratings, or in the interest rate environment, could have an adverse effect on our financing costs and structure.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we are a party to legal proceedings, including matters involving personnel and employment issues, personal injury, antitrust claims and other proceedings. Other legal proceedings purport to be brought as class actions on behalf of similarly situated parties. Some of these proceedings could result in a substantial loss to Kroger. We estimate our exposure to these legal proceedings and establish accruals for the estimated liabilities, where it is reasonably possible to estimate and where an adverse outcome is probable. Assessing and predicting the outcome of these matters involves substantial uncertainties. Adverse outcomes in these legal proceedings, or changes in our evaluations or predictions about the proceedings, could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. Please also refer to the “Legal Proceedings” section in Item 3 and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

MULTI-EMPLOYER PENSION OBLIGATIONS

As discussed in more detail below in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Critical Accounting Policies-Multi-Employer Pension Plans,” Kroger contributes to several multi-employer pension plans based on obligations arising under collective bargaining agreements with unions representing employees covered by those agreements. We believe that the present value of actuarially accrued liabilities in most of these multi-employer plans substantially exceeds the value of the assets held in trust to pay benefits, and we expect that the Company’s contributions to those funds, excluding all payments to the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (“UFCW”) consolidated pension plan and the pension plans that were consolidated into the UFCW consolidated pension plan, will increase over the next few years. A significant increase to those funding requirements could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Despite the fact that the pension obligations of these funds are not the liability or responsibility of the Company, except as noted below, there is a risk that the agencies that rate Kroger’s outstanding debt instruments could view the underfunded nature of these plans unfavorably when determining their ratings on our debt securities. Any downgrading of Kroger’s debt ratings likely would adversely affect Kroger’s cost of borrowing and access to capital.

We also currently bear the investment risk of one of the larger multi-employer pension plans in which we participate. In addition, we have been designated as the named fiduciary of this fund with sole investment authority of the assets of the fund. If investment results fail to meet our expectations, we could be responsible for the shortfall, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

INTEGRATION OF NEW BUSINESS

We enter into mergers and acquisitions with expected benefits including, among other things, operating efficiencies, procurement savings, innovation, sharing of best practices and increased market share that may allow for future growth. Achieving the anticipated benefits may be subject to a number of significant challenges and uncertainties, including, without limitation, whether unique corporate cultures will work collaboratively in an efficient and effective manner, the coordination of geographically separate organizations, the possibility of imprecise assumptions underlying expectations regarding potential synergies and the integration process, unforeseen expenses and delays, and competitive factors in the marketplace. We could also encounter unforeseen transaction and integration-related costs or other circumstances such as unforeseen liabilities or other issues. Many of these potential circumstances are outside of our control and any of them could result in increased costs, decreased revenue, decreased synergies and the diversion of management time and attention. If we are unable to achieve our objectives within the anticipated time frame, or at all, the expected benefits may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

INSURANCE

We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance to provide for potential liability for workers’ compensation, automobile and general liability, property, director and officers’ liability, and employee health care benefits. Any actuarial projection of losses is subject to a high degree of variability. Changes in legal claims, trends and interpretations, variability in inflation rates, changes in the nature and method of claims settlement, benefit level changes due to changes in applicable laws, insolvency of insurance carriers, and changes in discount rates could all affect our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

FUEL

We sell a significant amount of gasoline, which could face increased regulation and demand could be affected by concerns about the effect of emissions on the environment as well as retail price increases. The effect on the environment could be manifested by extreme weather conditions, such as more intense hurricanes, thunderstorms, tornadoes and snow or ice storms, as well as rising sea levels. We are unable to predict future regulations, environmental effects, political unrest, acts of terrorism and other matters that may affect the cost and availability of fuel, and how our customers will react, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

CURRENT ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

The economic recovery remains fragile and uneven. Our operating results could be materially impacted by changes in overall economic conditions that impact consumer confidence and spending, including discretionary spending. Future economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income such as employment levels, business conditions, changes in housing market conditions, the availability of credit, interest rates, tax rates, the impact of natural disasters or acts of terrorism, and other matters could reduce consumer spending. Increased fuel prices could also have an effect on consumer spending and on our costs of producing and procuring products that we sell. Our ability to pass higher prices along to consumers due to inflation or other reasons could have an effect on consumer spending. We are unable to predict how the global economy and financial markets will perform. If the global economy and financial markets do not perform as we expect, it could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows

WEATHER AND NATURAL DISASTERS

A large number of our stores and distribution facilities are geographically located in areas that are susceptible to hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts and earthquakes. Weather conditions and natural disasters could disrupt our operations at one or more of our facilities, interrupt the delivery of products to our stores, substantially increase the cost of products, including supplies and materials and substantially increase the cost of energy needed to operate our facilities or deliver products to our facilities. Adverse weather and natural disasters could materially affect our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

Our stores are subject to various laws, regulations, and administrative practices that affect our business. We must comply with numerous provisions regulating, among other things, health and sanitation standards, food labeling and safety, equal employment opportunity, minimum wages, and licensing for the sale of food, drugs, and alcoholic beverages. We cannot predict future laws, regulations, interpretations, administrative orders, or applications, or the effect they will have on our operations. They could, however, significantly increase the cost of doing business. They also could require the reformulation of some of the products that we sell (or manufacture for sale to third parties) to meet new standards. We also could be required to recall or discontinue the sale of products that cannot be reformulated. These changes could result in additional record keeping, expanded documentation of the properties of certain products, expanded or different labeling, or scientific substantiation. Any or all of these requirements could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

As of February 1, 2014, the Company operated more than 3,800 owned or leased supermarkets, convenience stores, fine jewelry stores, distribution warehouses and manufacturing plants through divisions, subsidiaries or affiliates. These facilities are located throughout the United States. While the Company’s current strategy emphasizes ownership of store real estate, a majority of the properties used to conduct the Company’s business are leased.

The Company generally owns store equipment, fixtures and leasehold improvements, as well as processing and manufacturing equipment. The total cost of the Company’s owned assets and capitalized leases, at February 1, 2014, was $32.4 billion while the accumulated depreciation was $15.5 billion.

Leased premises generally have base terms ranging from ten-to-twenty years with renewal options for additional periods. Some options provide the right to purchase the property after the conclusion of the lease term. Store rentals are normally payable monthly at a stated amount or at a guaranteed minimum amount plus a percentage of sales over a stated dollar volume. Rentals for the distribution, manufacturing and miscellaneous facilities generally are payable monthly at stated amounts. For additional information on lease obligations, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

Various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business, including suits charging violations of certain antitrust, wage and hour, or civil rights laws, as well as product liability cases, are pending against the Company. Some of these suits purport or have been determined to be class actions and/or seek substantial damages. Any damages that may be awarded in antitrust cases will be automatically trebled. Although it is not possible at this time to evaluate the merits of all of these claims and lawsuits, nor their likelihood of success, the Company is of the belief that any resulting liability will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company continually evaluates its exposure to loss contingencies arising from pending or threatened litigation and believes it has made provisions where it is reasonably possible to estimate and where an adverse outcome is probable. Nonetheless, assessing and predicting the outcomes of these matters involves substantial uncertainties. Management currently believes that the aggregate range of loss for our exposures is not material to the Company. It remains possible that despite management’s current belief, material differences in actual outcomes or changes in management’s evaluation or predictions could arise that could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

(a)

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for our common shares on the New York Stock Exchange for each full quarterly period of the two most recently completed fiscal years:

COMMON SHARE PRICE RANGE

	2013				2012
Quarter	High		Low		High		Low
1st	$	35.44	$	27.53	$	24.78	$	21.76
2nd	$	39.98	$	32.77	$	23.22	$	20.98
3rd	$	43.85	$	35.91	$	25.44	$	21.57
4th	$	42.73	$	35.71	$	28.00	$	24.19

Main trading market: New York Stock Exchange (Symbol KR)

Number of shareholders of record at year-end 2013: 30,587

Number of shareholders of record at March 28, 2014: 30,449

During 2012, the Company paid three quarterly cash dividends of $0.115 per share and one quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. During 2013, the Company paid three quarterly dividends of $0.15 per share and one quarterly dividend of $0.165 per share. On March 1, 2014, the Company paid a quarterly dividend of $0.165 per share. On March 13, 2014, the Company announced that its Board of Directors has declared a quarterly dividend of $0.165 per share, payable on June 1, 2014, to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 15, 2014.

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the five-year cumulative total shareholder return on Kroger’s common shares, based on the market price of the common shares and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the cumulative total return of companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and a peer group composed of food and drug companies.

(c)

The following table presents information on our purchases of our common shares during the fourth quarter of 2013.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Period (1)	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2)	Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (3) (in millions)
First period - four weeks
November 10, 2013 to December 7, 2013	1,525,832	$	41.99	1,525,832	$	281
Second period - four weeks
December 8, 2013 to January 4, 2014	1,776,028	$	40.04	1,776,028	$	214
Third period — four weeks
January 5, 2014 to February 1, 2014	2,407,317	$	37.91	2,407,317	$	129

Total	5,709,177	$	39.66	5,709,177	$	129

(1)	The reported periods conform to the Company’s fiscal calendar composed of thirteen 28-day periods. The fourth quarter of 2013 contained three 28-day periods.

(2)	Shares were repurchased under (i) a $500 million share repurchase program, authorized by the Board of Directors and announced on October 16, 2012 and (ii) a program announced on December 6, 1999 to repurchase common shares to reduce dilution resulting from our employee stock option and long-term incentive plans, which program is limited to proceeds received from exercises of stock options and the tax benefits associated therewith. The programs have no expiration date but may be terminated by the Board of Directors at any time. Total shares purchased include shares that were surrendered to the Company by participants under the Company’s long-term incentive plans to pay for taxes on restricted stock awards. On March 13, 2014, the Company announced a new $1 billion share repurchase program that was authorized by the Board of Directors, replacing the program identified in clause (i) above.

(3)	The amounts shown in this column reflect amounts remaining, as of February 1, 2014, under the $500 million share repurchase program referenced in clause (i) of Note 2 above. Amounts to be invested under the program utilizing option exercise proceeds are dependent upon option exercise activity.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

	Fiscal Years Ended
	February 1, 2014 (52 weeks)		February 2, 2013 (53 weeks)*		January 28, 2012 (52 weeks)*		January 29, 2011 (52 weeks)*		January 30, 2010 (52 weeks)*
	(In millions, except per share amounts)
Sales	$	98,375	$	96,619	$	90,269	$	81,967	$	76,538
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests	1,531		1,508		596		1,133		57
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co.	1,519		1,497		602		1,116		70
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per diluted common share	2.90		2.77		1.01		1.74		0.11
Total assets	29,281		24,634		23,454		23,505		23,126
Long-term liabilities, including obligations under capital leases and financing obligations	13,181		9,359		10,405		10,137		10,473
Total shareowners’ equity — The Kroger Co.	5,384		4,207		3,981		5,296		4,852
Cash dividends per common share	0.615		0.495		0.43		0.39		0.365

* Certain prior year amounts have been revised or reclassified to conform to current year presentation. For further information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of The Kroger Co. should be read in conjunction with the “Forward-looking Statements” section set forth in Part I, the “Risk Factors” section set forth in Item 1A of Part I and “Outlook” below.

OUR BUSINESS

The Kroger Co. was founded in 1883 and incorporated in 1902. It is one of the nation’s largest retailers, as measured by revenue, operating 2,640 supermarket and multi-department stores under two dozen banners including Kroger, City Market, Dillons, Food 4 Less, Fred Meyer, Fry’s, Harris Teeter, Jay C, King Soopers, QFC, Ralphs and Smith’s. Of these stores, 1,240 have fuel centers. We also operate 786 convenience stores, either directly or through franchisees, and 320 fine jewelry stores.

Kroger operates 38 manufacturing plants, primarily bakeries and dairies, which supply approximately 40% of the corporate brand units sold in our retail outlets.

Our revenues are earned and cash is generated as consumer products are sold to customers in our stores. We earn income predominately by selling products at price levels that produce revenues in excess of the costs we incur to make these products available to our customers. Such costs include procurement and distribution costs, facility occupancy and operational costs, and overhead expenses. Our retail operations, which represent over 99% of Kroger’s consolidated sales and EBITDA, are our only reportable segment.

On January 28, 2014, we closed our merger with Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. (“Harris Teeter”) by purchasing 100% of the Harris Teeter outstanding common stock for approximately $2.4 billion. The merger allows us to expand into the fast-growing southeastern and mid-Atlantic markets and into Washington, D.C. Harris Teeter is included in our ending Consolidated Balance Sheet, but because of the timing of the merger closing late in the year its results of operations were not material to our consolidated results of operations for 2013. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to our merger with Harris Teeter.

OUR 2013 PERFORMANCE

We achieved outstanding results in 2013. Our business strategy continues to resonate with a full range of customers and our results reflect the balance we seek to achieve across our business including positive identical sales growth, increases in loyal household count, and good cost control, as well as growth in net earnings and net earnings per diluted share. Our 2013 net earnings were $1.5 billion or $2.90 per diluted share, compared to $1.5 billion, or $2.77 per diluted share for the same period of 2012. The net earnings for 2013 include a net benefit of $23 million, which includes benefits from certain tax items of $40 million, offset partially by after-tax expense of $17 million ($7 million in interest and $10 million in operating, general and administrative expenses) in costs related to our merger with Harris Teeter (“2013 adjusted items”). See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information relating to the benefits from certain tax items. For 2012, our net earnings include an estimated after-tax amount of $58 million or $0.11 per diluted share due to a 53rd week in fiscal year 2012 (the “extra week”). In addition, 2012 net earnings benefited by $74 million after-tax or $0.14 per diluted share from a settlement with Visa and MasterCard and from a reduction in our obligation to fund the UFCW consolidated pension fund created in January 2012. Excluding the 2013 adjusted items, net earnings for 2013 totaled $1.5 billion, or $2.85 per diluted share, compared to net earnings in 2012 of $1.4 billion, or $2.52 per diluted share, excluding the Visa and MasterCard settlement, the UFCW consolidated pension fund adjustment and the extra week in 2012. We believe adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per diluted share present a more accurate year-over-year comparison of our financial results because the adjusted items were not directly related to our day-to-day business. After accounting for these 2013 and 2012 adjusted items, our adjusted net earnings per diluted share for 2013 represents a 13% increase, compared to 2012. Please refer to the “Net Earnings” section for more information.

Our identical supermarket sales increased 3.6%, excluding fuel, in 2013, compared to 2012. We have achieved 41 consecutive quarters of positive identical supermarket sales growth, excluding fuel. As we continue to outpace many of our competitors on identical supermarket sales growth, we continue to gain market share. We focus on identical supermarket sales growth, excluding fuel, as it is a key performance target for our long-term growth strategy.

Increasing market share is an important part of our long-term strategy as it best reflects how our products and services resonate with customers. Market share growth allows us to spread the fixed costs in our business over a wider revenue base. Our fundamental operating philosophy is to maintain and increase market share by offering customers good prices and superior products and service. Based on Nielsen POS+ data, our estimated market share increased in total by approximately 50 basis points in 2013 across our 18 marketing areas outlined by the Nielsen report. This information also indicates that our market share increased in 16 of the marketing areas and declined in two. Wal-Mart supercenters are one of our top two competitors in 13 of these 18 marketing areas. In these 13 marketing areas, our market share increased in 12 and slightly declined in one. These market share results reflect our long-term strategy of market share growth.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion summarizes our operating results for 2013 compared to 2012 and for 2012 compared to 2011. Comparability is affected by income and expense items that fluctuated significantly between and among the periods and an extra week in 2012.

Net Earnings

Net earnings totaled $1.5 billion in 2013, $1.5 billion in 2012 and $602 million in 2011. The net earnings for 2013 include a net benefit of $23 million, after tax, related to the 2013 adjusted items. The net earnings for 2012 include a benefit from net earnings of approximately $58 million, after-tax, for the extra week and a net $74 million, after-tax, benefit for the settlement with Visa and MasterCard and a reduction in our obligation to fund the UFCW consolidated pension fund created in January 2012 (“2012 adjusted items”). The net earnings for 2011 include a UFCW consolidated pension plan charge totaling $591 million, after-tax (“2011 adjusted item”). Excluding these benefits and charges for adjusted items in 2013, 2012 and 2011, adjusted net earnings were $1.5 billion in 2013, $1.4 billion in 2012 and $1.2 billion in 2011. 2013 adjusted net earnings improved, compared to adjusted net earnings in 2012, due to an increase in first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) non-fuel operating profit and decreased interest expense, partially offset by increased income tax expense. 2012 adjusted net earnings improved, compared to adjusted net earnings in 2011, due to an increase in FIFO non-fuel operating profit, increased net earnings from our fuel operations and a last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) charge of $55 million (pre-tax), compared to a LIFO charge of $216 million (pre-tax) in 2011, partially offset by increased interest expense and income tax expense.

2013 net earnings per diluted share totaled $2.90, and adjusted net earnings per diluted share totaled $2.85, which excludes the 2013 adjusted items. 2012 net earnings per diluted share totaled $2.77, and adjusted net earnings per diluted share totaled $2.52, which excludes the 2012 adjusted items. 2011 net earnings per diluted share totaled $1.01, and adjusted net earnings per diluted share in 2011 totaled $2.00, which excludes the 2011 adjusted item. Adjusted net earnings per diluted share in 2013, compared to adjusted net earnings per diluted share in 2012, increased primarily due to fewer shares outstanding as a result of the repurchase of Kroger common shares, increased FIFO non-fuel operating profit and decreased interest expense, partially offset by increased income tax expense. Adjusted net earnings per diluted share in 2012, compared to adjusted net earnings per diluted share in 2011, increased primarily due to fewer shares outstanding as a result of the repurchase of Kroger common shares, increased FIFO non-fuel operating profit, increased net earnings from our fuel operations and a decrease in the LIFO charge to $55 million (pre-tax), compared to a LIFO charge of $216 million (pre-tax) in 2011, partially offset by increased interest expense and income tax expense.

Management believes adjusted net earnings (and adjusted net earnings per diluted share) are useful metrics to investors and analysts because the adjusted items referenced above in net earnings and net earnings per diluted share are not directly related to our day-to-day business. Adjusted net earnings (and adjusted net earnings per diluted share) are non-generally accepted accounting principle (“non-GAAP”) financial measures and should not be considered alternatives to net earnings (and net earnings per diluted share) or any other generally accepted accounting principle (“GAAP”) measure of performance. Adjusted net earnings (and adjusted net earnings per diluted share) should not be reviewed in isolation or considered substitutes for our financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP. Management uses adjusted net earnings (and adjusted net earnings per diluted share) as it believes these measures are more meaningful indicators of ongoing operating performance since, as adjusted, those earnings relate more directly to our day-to-day operations. Management also uses adjusted net earnings (and adjusted net earnings per diluted share) to measure our progress against internal budgets and targets. In addition, management takes into account adjusted net earnings when calculating management incentive programs.

The following table provides a reconciliation of net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. to net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. excluding the adjusted items and a reconciliation of net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per diluted common share to the net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per diluted common share excluding the adjusted items, for 2013, 2012 and 2011:

Net Earnings per Diluted Share excluding the Adjustment Items

(in millions, except per share amounts)

	2013			2012			2011
Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co.	$	1,519		$	1,497		$	602
Benefit from certain tax items offset by Harris Teeter merger costs(1)	(23		)	—			—
53rd week adjustment (1)	—			(58		)	—
Adjustment for the UFCW consolidated pension plan liability and credit card settlement (1)	—			(74		)	—
UFCW pension plan consolidation charge (1)	—			—			591

Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. excluding the adjustment items above	$	1,496		$	1,365		$	1,193

Net Earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per diluted common share	$	2.90		$	2.77		$	1.01
Benefit from certain tax items offset by Harris Teeter merger costs (2)	(0.05		)	—			—
53rd week adjustment (2)	—			(0.11		)	—
Adjustments for the UFCW consolidated pension plan liability and credit card settlement (2)	—			(0.14		)	—
UFCW pension plan consolidation charge (2)	—			—			0.99

Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per diluted common share excluding the adjustment items above	$	2.85		$	2.52		$	2.00

Average numbers of common shares used in diluted calculation	520			537			593

(1)	The amounts presented represent the after-tax effect of each adjustment. Pre-tax amounts were $27 for Harris Teeter merger costs in 2013, $91 for the 53rd week adjustment in 2012, $115 for the adjustment for the UFCW consolidated pension plan liability and credit card settlement in 2012 and $953 for the UFCW pension plan consolidation charge in 2011.
(2)	The amounts presented represent the net earnings per diluted common share effect of each adjustment.

Sales

Total Sales

(in millions)

	2013		Percentage Increase(2)		2012		2012 Adjusted (3)		Percentage Increase(4)		2011
Total supermarket sales without fuel	$	76,666	4.0	%	$	75,179	$	73,733	3.8	%	$	71,004
Fuel sales	18,962		3.0	%	18,896		18,413		8.9	%	16,901
Other sales(1)	2,747		9.2	%	2,544		2,515		6.4	%	2,364

Total sales	$	98,375	3.9	%	$	96,619	$	94,661	4.9	%	$	90,269

(1)	Other sales primarily relate to sales at convenience stores, excluding fuel; jewelry stores; manufacturing plants to outside customers; variable interest entities; a specialty pharmacy; and in-store health clinics.
(2)	This column represents the percentage increase in 2013, compared to adjusted sales in 2012.
(3)	The 2012 adjusted column represents the items presented in the 2012 column as adjusted to remove the extra week.
(4)	This column represents the percentage increase in adjusted sales in 2012, compared to 2011.

Total sales increased in 2013, compared to 2012, by 1.82%. The increase in 2013 total sales, compared to 2012, was primarily due to our identical supermarket sales increase, excluding fuel, of 3.6%, partially offset by the extra week in fiscal 2012. Total sales increased in 2013, compared to 2012 adjusted total sales, by 3.9%. The increase in 2013 total sales, compared to 2012 adjusted total sales, was primarily due to our identical supermarket sales increase, excluding fuel, of 3.6%. Identical supermarket sales, excluding fuel, increased in 2013, compared to 2012, primarily due to an increase in average sale per customer, partially due to inflation, and an increase in the transaction count.

Total sales increased in 2012, compared to 2011, by 7.0%. The increase in 2012 total sales, compared to 2011, was primarily due to our identical supermarket sales increase, excluding fuel, of 3.5%, increased fuel sales of 8.9% and the extra week in fiscal 2012. Adjusted total sales increased in 2012, compared to 2011, by 4.9%. The increase in 2012 adjusted total sales, compared to 2011 total sales, was primarily due to our identical supermarket sales increase, excluding fuel, of 3.5% and an increase in fuel sales of 8.9%. Identical supermarket sales, excluding fuel, increased in 2012, adjusted for the extra week, compared to 2011, primarily due to an increase in the average sale per customer, partially due to inflation, and an increase in the transaction count. Total fuel sales increased in 2012, adjusted for the extra week, compared to 2011, primarily due to an increase in fuel gallons sold of 7.8% and an increase in the average retail fuel price of 1.7%. The increase in the average retail fuel price was caused by an increase in the product cost of fuel.

We define a supermarket as identical when it has been in operation without expansion or relocation for five full quarters. Although identical supermarket sales is a relatively standard term, numerous methods exist for calculating identical supermarket sales growth. As a result, the method used by our management to calculate identical supermarket sales may differ from methods other companies use to calculate identical supermarket sales. We urge you to understand the methods used by other companies to calculate identical supermarket sales before comparing our identical supermarket sales to those of other such companies. Fuel discounts received at our fuel centers and earned based on in-store purchases are included in all of the supermarket identical sales results calculations illustrated below and reduce our identical supermarket sales results. Differences between total supermarket sales and identical supermarket sales primarily relate to changes in supermarket square footage. Identical supermarket sales include sales from all departments at identical Fred Meyer multi-department stores. We calculate annualized identical supermarket sales by adding together four quarters of identical supermarket sales. Our identical supermarket sales results are summarized in the table below, based on the 52-week period of 2013, compared to the previous year results adjusted to a comparable 52 week period.

Identical Supermarket Sales

(dollars in millions)

	2013			2012(1)
Including supermarket fuel centers	$	88,482		$	85,661
Excluding supermarket fuel centers	$	74,095		$	71,541

Including supermarket fuel centers	3.3		%	4.5		%
Excluding supermarket fuel centers	3.6		%	3.5		%

(1)

Identical supermarket sales for 2013 were calculated on a 52 week basis by excluding week 1 of fiscal 2012 in our 2012 identical supermarket sales base. Identical supermarket sales for 2012 were calculated on a 53 week basis by including week 1 of fiscal 2012 in our 2011 identical supermarket sales base.

Gross Margin and FIFO Gross Margin

Our gross margin rates, as a percentage of sales, were 20.57% in 2013, 20.59% in 2012 and 20.92% in 2011. The decrease in 2013, compared to 2012, resulted primarily from continued investments in lower prices for our customers and increased shrink and advertising costs, as a percentage of sales, offset partially by a growth rate in retail fuel sales that was lower than the total Company sales growth rate. Our retail fuel operations lower our gross margin rate, as a percentage of sales, due to the very low gross margin on retail fuel sales as compared to non-fuel sales. A lower growth rate in retail fuel sales, as compared to the growth rate for the total Company, increases the gross margin rates, as a percentage of sales, when compared to the prior year. The decrease in gross margin rates in 2012, compared to 2011, resulted primarily from a higher growth rate in fuel sales, as compared to the growth rate for the total Company, continued investments in lower prices for our customers and increased shrink and warehousing costs, as a percentage of sales, offset partially by a decrease in the LIFO charge as a percentage of sales.

We calculate FIFO gross margin as sales minus merchandise costs, including advertising, warehousing, and transportation expenses, but excluding the LIFO charge. Merchandise costs exclude depreciation and rent expenses. Our LIFO charge was $52 million in 2013, $55 million in 2012 and $216 million in 2011. FIFO gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered as an alternative to gross margin or any other GAAP measure of performance. FIFO gross margin should not be reviewed in isolation or considered as a substitute for our financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP. FIFO gross margin is an important measure used by management to evaluate merchandising and operational effectiveness. Management believes FIFO gross margin is a useful metric to investors and analysts because it measures our day-to-day merchandising and operational effectiveness.

Our FIFO gross margin rates, as a percentage of sales, were 20.62% in 2013, 20.65% in 2012 and 21.15% in 2011. Our retail fuel operations lower our FIFO gross margin rate, as a percentage of sales, due to the very low FIFO gross margin on retail fuel sales as compared to non-fuel sales. Excluding the effect of retail fuel operations, our FIFO gross margin rate decreased 14 basis points in 2013, as a percentage of sales, compared to 2012. This decrease in 2013, compared to 2012, resulted primarily from continued investments in lower prices for our customers and increased shrink and advertising costs as a percentage of sales. Excluding the effect of retail fuel operations, our FIFO gross margin rate decreased 40 basis points in 2012, as a percentage of sales, compared to 2011. This decrease in 2012, compared to 2011, resulted primarily from continued investments in lower prices for our customers and increased shrink and warehousing costs as a percentage of sales.

LIFO Charge

The LIFO charge was $52 million in 2013, $55 million in 2012 and $216 million in 2011. We experienced relatively consistent levels of product cost inflation in 2013, compared to 2012. In 2013, our LIFO charge resulted primarily from an annualized product cost inflation related to meat, seafood and pharmacy. In 2012, our LIFO charge resulted primarily from an annualized product cost inflation related to grocery, natural foods, meat, deli and bakery, general merchandise and grocery, partially offset by deflation in seafood and manufactured product. In 2012, we experienced lower levels of product cost inflation, compared to 2011. In 2011, our LIFO charge primarily resulted from an annualized product cost inflation related to grocery, meat and seafood, deli and bakery, and pharmacy.

Operating, General and Administrative Expenses

Operating, general and administrative (“OG&A”) expenses consist primarily of employee-related costs such as wages, health care benefits and retirement plan costs, utilities and credit card fees. Rent expense, depreciation and amortization expense, and interest expense are not included in OG&A.

OG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales, were 15.45% in 2013, 15.37% in 2012 and 17.00% in 2011. Excluding the 2013, 2012 and 2011 adjusted items, OG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales, were 15.43% in 2013, 15.52% in 2012 and 15.94% in 2011. Our retail fuel operations reduce our overall OG&A rate, as a percentage of sales, due to the very low OG&A rate on retail fuel sales as compared to non-fuel sales. OG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales excluding fuel and the 2013 adjusted items, decreased 17 basis points in 2013, compared to 2012, adjusted for the 2012 adjusted items. This decrease resulted primarily from increased identical supermarket sales growth, productivity improvements and effective cost controls at the store level, offset partially by increased incentive compensation. OG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales excluding fuel and the 2012 adjusted items, decreased 36 basis points in 2012, compared to 2011, adjusted for the 2011 adjusted items. This decrease resulted primarily from increased identical supermarket sales growth, productivity improvements, effective cost controls at the store level, the benefit received in lower operating expenses from the consolidation of four UFCW multi-employer pension plans in the prior year and decreased incentive compensation, offset partially by increased healthcare costs.

Rent Expense

Rent expense was $613 million in 2013, as compared to $628 million in 2012 and $619 million in 2011. Rent expense, as a percentage of sales, was 0.62% in 2013, as compared to 0.65% in 2012 and 0.69% in 2011. Rent expense, as a percentage of sales excluding fuel, decreased four basis points in 2013, compared to 2012 and four basis points in 2012, compared to 2011. These continual decreases in rent expense, as a percentage of sales both including and excluding fuel, reflects our continued emphasis on owning rather than leasing, whenever possible, and the benefit of increased sales.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense was $1.7 billion in both 2013 and 2012 and $1.6 billion in 2011. Depreciation and amortization expense, as a percentage of sales, was 1.73% in 2013, 1.71% in 2012 and 1.81% in 2011. Excluding the extra week in 2012, depreciation and amortization expense, as a percentage of sales, was 1.74% in 2012. Depreciation and amortization expense, as a percentage of sales excluding fuel and the extra week in 2012, decreased three basis points in 2013, compared to 2012 and seven basis points in 2012, compared to 2011. These continual decreases in depreciation and amortization expense, excluding the extra week in 2012, as a percentage of sales both including and excluding fuel, are primarily the result of increasing sales, offset partially by our increased spending in capital investments.

Operating Profit and FIFO Operating Profit

Operating profit was $2.7 billion in 2013, $2.8 billion in 2012 and $1.3 billion in 2011. Excluding the extra week, operating profit was $2.7 billion in 2012. Operating profit, as a percentage of sales, was 2.77% in 2013, 2.86% in 2012 and 1.42% in 2011. Operating profit, as a percentage of sales excluding the extra week in 2012, was 2.81%. Operating profit, excluding the 2013, 2012 and 2011 adjusted items, was $2.7 billion in 2013, $2.6 billion in 2012 and $2.2 billion in 2011. Operating profit, as a percentage of sales excluding the 2013, 2012 and 2011 adjusted items, was 2.79% in 2013, 2.69% in 2012 and 2.47% in 2011.

Operating profit, as a percentage of sales excluding the 2013 and 2012 adjusted items, increased 10 basis points in 2013, compared to 2012, primarily due to improvements in operating, general and administrative expenses, rent and depreciation, as a percentage of sales, offset partially by continued investments in lower prices for our customers and increased shrink and advertising costs, as a percentage of sales. Operating profit, as a percentage of sales excluding the 2012 and 2011 adjusted items, increased 22 basis points in 2012, compared to 2011, primarily due to improvements in operating, general and administrative expenses, rent, depreciation and the LIFO charge, as a percentage of sales, offset partially by continued investments in lower prices for our customers and increased shrink and warehousing costs, as a percentage of sales.

We calculate FIFO operating profit as operating profit excluding the LIFO charge. FIFO operating profit is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered as an alternative to operating profit or any other GAAP measure of performance. FIFO operating profit should not be reviewed in isolation or considered as a substitute for our financial results as reported in accordance with GAAP. FIFO operating profit is an important measure used by management to evaluate operational effectiveness. Management believes FIFO operating profit is a useful metric to investors and analysts because it measures our day-to-day operational effectiveness. Since fuel discounts are earned based on in-store purchases, fuel operating profit does not include fuel discounts, which are allocated to our in-store supermarket location departments. We also derive operating, general and administrative expenses, rent and depreciation and amortization through the use of estimated allocations in the calculation of fuel operating profit.

FIFO operating profit was $2.8 billion in 2013 and 2012, and $1.5 billion in 2011. Excluding the extra week in 2012, FIFO operating profit was $2.7 billion. FIFO operating profit, as a percentage of sales, was 2.82% in 2013, 2.92% in 2012 and 1.66% in 2011. FIFO operating profit, as a percentage of sales excluding the extra week in 2012, was 2.87%. FIFO operating profit, excluding the 2013, 2012, and 2011 adjusted items, was $2.8 billion in 2013, $2.6 billion in 2012 and $2.4 billion in 2011. FIFO operating profit, as a percentage of sales excluding the 2013, 2012, and 2011 adjusted items, was 2.84% in 2013, 2.75% in 2012, and 2.71% in 2011.

Retail fuel sales lower our overall FIFO operating profit rate due to the very low FIFO operating profit rate, as a percentage of sales, of retail fuel sales compared to non-fuel sales. FIFO operating profit, excluding fuel, was $2.6 billion in 2013 and 2012, and $1.3 billion in 2011. Excluding the extra week, FIFO operating profit, excluding fuel, was $2.5 billion in 2012. FIFO operating profit, as a percentage of sales excluding fuel, was 3.22% in 2013, 3.35% in 2012, and 1.77% in 2011. Excluding the extra week, FIFO operating profit, as a percentage of sales excluding fuel, was 3.28% in 2012. FIFO operating profit, excluding fuel and the 2013, 2012 and 2011 adjusted items, was $2.6 billion in 2013, $2.4 billion in 2012 and $2.3 billion in 2011. FIFO operating profit, as a percentage of sales excluding fuel and the 2013, 2012, and 2011 adjusted items, was 3.24% in 2013, 3.13% in 2012 and 3.07% in 2011.

Excluding fuel, FIFO operating profit, as a percentage of sales excluding the 2013 and 2012 adjusted items, increased 11 basis points in 2013, compared to 2012, primarily due to improvements in OG&A expenses, rent and depreciation, as a percentage of sales, offset partially by continued investments in lower prices for our customers and increased shrink and advertising costs, as a percentage of sales. Excluding fuel, FIFO operating profit, as a percentage of sales excluding the 2012 and 2011 adjusted items, increased six basis points in 2012, compared to 2011, primarily due to improvements in operating, general and administrative expenses, rent and depreciation, as a percentage of sales, offset partially by continued investments in lower prices for our customers and increased shrink and warehousing costs, as a percentage of sales.

The following table provides a reconciliation of operating profit to FIFO operating profit and FIFO operating profit, excluding fuel and the adjusted items, for 2013, 2012 and 2011 ($ in millions):

	2013			2013 Percentage of Sales		2012			2012 Percentage of Sales		2012 Adjusted(1)			2012 Adjusted Percentage of Sales		2011			2011 Percentage of Sales
Sales	$	98,375				$	96,619				$	94,661				$	90,269
Fuel sales	(18,962		)			(18,896		)			(18,413		)			(16,901		)

Sales excluding fuel	$	79,413				$	77,723				$	76,248				$	73,368

Operating profit	$	2,725		2.77	%	$	2,764		2.86	%	$	2,664		2.81	%	$	1,278		1.42	%
LIFO charge	52			0.05	%	55			0.06	%	55			0.06	%	216			0.24	%

FIFO operating profit	2,777			2.82	%	2,819			2.92	%	2,719			2.87	%	1,494			1.66	%
Fuel operating profit	(219		)	1.15	%	(218		)	1.15	%	(215		)	1.17	%	(192		)	1.14	%

FIFO operating profit excluding fuel	2,558			3.22	%	2,601			3.35	%	2,504			3.28	%	1,302			1.77	%
Adjusted items(2)	16					(115		)			(115		)			953

FIFO operating profit excluding fuel and the adjusted items	$	2,574		3.24	%	$	2,486		3.20	%	$	2,389		3.13	%	$	2,255		3.07	%

(1) The 2012 adjusted column represents items presented above adjusted to remove the extra week.

(2) Adjusted items refer to the pre-tax effect of the 2013, 2012 and 2011 adjusted items.

Percentages may not sum due to rounding.

Interest Expense

Net interest expense totaled $443 million in 2013, $462 million in 2012 and $435 million in 2011. Excluding the extra week, net interest expense was $454 million in 2012. The decrease in net interest expense in 2013, compared to 2012, excluding the extra week, resulted primarily from a lower weighted average interest rate, offset partially by a decrease in the net benefit from interest rate swaps. The increase in net interest expense in 2012 excluding the extra week, compared to 2011, resulted primarily from a decrease in the benefit from interest rate swaps and an increase in total debt, offset partially by a lower weighted average interest rate.

Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate was 32.9% in 2013, 34.5% in 2012 and 29.3% in 2011. The 2013 tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate primarily as a result of the utilization of tax credits, the Domestic Manufacturing Deduction and other changes, partially offset by the effect of state income taxes. The 2012 tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate primarily as a result of the utilization of tax credits, the favorable resolution of certain tax issues and other changes, partially offset by the effect of state income taxes. The 2013 benefit from the Domestic Manufacturing Deduction increased from 2012 due to additional deductions taken in 2013, as well as the amendment of prior years’ tax returns to claim the additional benefit available in years still under review by the Internal Revenue Service. The 2011 effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate primarily as a result of the utilization of tax credits and the favorable resolution of certain tax issues, partially offset by the effect of state income taxes. The 2011 effective tax rate was also lower than 2013 and 2012 due to the effect on pre-tax income of the UFCW consolidated pension plan charge of $953 million ($591 million after-tax). Excluding the UFCW consolidated pension plan charge, our effective rate in 2011 would have been 33.9%.

COMMON SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM

We maintain share repurchase programs that comply with Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 and allow for the orderly repurchase of our common shares, from time to time. We made open market purchases of Kroger common shares totaling $338 million in 2013, $1.2 billion in 2012 and $1.4 billion in 2011 under these repurchase programs. In addition to these repurchase programs, we also repurchase common shares to reduce dilution resulting from our employee stock option plans. This program is solely funded by proceeds from stock option exercises, and the tax benefit from these exercises. We repurchased approximately $271 million in 2013, $96 million in 2012 and $127 million in 2011 of Kroger shares under the stock option program.

The shares reacquired in 2013 were acquired under two separate share repurchase programs. The first is a $500 million repurchase program that was authorized by Kroger’s Board of Directors on October 16, 2012. The second is a program that uses the cash proceeds from the exercises of stock options by participants in Kroger’s stock option and long-term incentive plans as well as the associated tax benefits. As of February 1, 2014, we had $129 million remaining on the October 16, 2012 $500 million share repurchase program. On March 13, 2014, the Company announced a new $1 billion share repurchase program that was authorized by the Board of Directors, replacing the $500 million repurchase program that was authorized by the Board of Directors on October 16, 2012.

CAPITAL INVESTMENTS

Capital investments, including changes in construction-in-progress payables and excluding acquisitions and the purchase of leased facilities, totaled $2.3 billion in 2013, $2.0 billion in 2012 and $1.9 billion in 2011. Capital investments for acquisitions totaled $2.3 billion in 2013, $122 million in 2012 and $51 million in 2011. Capital investments for acquisitions of $2.3 billion in 2013 relate to our merger with Harris Teeter. Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the merger with Harris Teeter. Capital investments for the purchase of leased facilities totaled $108 million in 2013, $73 million in 2012 and $60 million in 2011. The table below shows our supermarket storing activity and our total food store square footage:

Supermarket Storing Activity

	2013		2012		2011
Beginning of year	2,424		2,435		2,460
Opened	17		18		10
Opened (relocation)	7		7		12
Acquired	227		—		6
Acquired (relocation)	—		—		2
Closed (operational)	(28	)	(29	)	(41	)
Closed (relocation)	(7	)	(7	)	(14	)

End of year	2,640		2,424		2,435

Total food store square footage (in millions)	161		149		149

The following table provides a calculation of ROIC for 2013 and 2012 on a 52 week basis and excluding the assets and liabilities recorded at year end for Harris Teeter ($ in millions):

	February 1, 2014			February 2, 2013
Return on Invested Capital
Numerator
Operating profit on a 53 week basis in fiscal year 2012	$	2,725		$	2,764
53rd week operating profit adjustment	—			(100		)
LIFO charge	52			55
Depreciation	1,703			1,652
Rent on a 53 week basis in fiscal year 2012	613			628
53rd week rent adjustment	—			(12		)
2013 adjusted item	16			—
2012 adjusted items	—			(115		)
Adjusted operating profit	$	5,109		$	4,872

Denominator
Average total assets	$	26,958		$	24,044
Average taxes receivable(1)	(10		)	(22		)
Average LIFO reserve	1,124			1,071
Average accumulated depreciation and amortization	14,991			14,051
Average trade accounts payable	(4,683		)	(4,382		)
Average accrued salaries and wages	(1,084		)	(1,061		)
Average other current liabilities(2)	(2,544		)	(2,314		)
Adjustment for Harris Teeter (3)	(1,618		)	—
Rent x 8	4,904			4,928
Average invested capital	$	38,038		$	36,315
Return on Invested Capital	13.43		%	13.42		%

(1) Taxes receivable were $18 as of February 1, 2014, $2 as of February 2, 2013 and $42 as of January 28, 2012.

(2) Other current liabilities included accrued income taxes of $92 as of February 1, 2014 and $128 as of February 2, 2013. As of January 28, 2012, other current liabilities did not include any accrued income taxes. Accrued income taxes are removed from other current liabilities in the calculation of average invested capital.

(3) Harris Teeter’s invested capital has been excluded from the calculation due to the timing of the merger and the immaterial effect on the operations as compared to the average invested capital.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We have chosen accounting policies that we believe are appropriate to report accurately and fairly our operating results and financial position, and we apply those accounting policies in a consistent manner. Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and other factors we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

We believe that the following accounting policies are the most critical in the preparation of our financial statements because they involve the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Self-Insurance Costs

We primarily are self-insured for costs related to workers’ compensation and general liability claims. The liabilities represent our best estimate, using generally accepted actuarial reserving methods, of the ultimate obligations for reported claims plus those incurred but not reported for all claims incurred through February 1, 2014. We establish case reserves for reported claims using case-basis evaluation of the underlying claim data and we update as information becomes known.

For both workers’ compensation and general liability claims, we have purchased stop-loss coverage to limit our exposure to any significant exposure on a per claim basis. We are insured for covered costs in excess of these per claim limits. We account for the liabilities for workers’ compensation claims on a present value basis utilizing a risk-adjusted discount rate. A 25 basis point decrease in our discount rate would increase our liability by approximately $2 million. General liability claims are not discounted.

The assumptions underlying the ultimate costs of existing claim losses are subject to a high degree of unpredictability, which can affect the liability recorded for such claims. For example, variability in inflation rates of health care costs inherent in these claims can affect the amounts realized. Similarly, changes in legal trends and interpretations, as well as a change in the nature and method of how claims are settled can affect ultimate costs. Our estimates of liabilities incurred do not anticipate significant changes in historical trends for these variables, and any changes could have a considerable effect on future claim costs and currently recorded liabilities.

Impairments of Long-Lived Assets

We monitor the carrying value of long-lived assets for potential impairment each quarter based on whether certain trigger events have occurred. These events include current period losses combined with a history of losses or a projection of continuing losses or a significant decrease in the market value of an asset. When a trigger event occurs, we perform an impairment calculation, comparing projected undiscounted cash flows, utilizing current cash flow information and expected growth rates related to specific stores, to the carrying value for those stores. If we identify impairment for long-lived assets to be held and used, we compare the assets’ current carrying value to the assets’ fair value. Fair value is determined based on market values or discounted future cash flows. We record impairment when the carrying value exceeds fair market value. With respect to owned property and equipment held for disposal, we adjust the value of the property and equipment to reflect recoverable values based on our previous efforts to dispose of similar assets and current economic conditions. We recognize impairment for the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair market value, reduced by estimated direct costs of disposal. We recorded asset impairments in the normal course of business totaling $39 million in 2013, $18 million in 2012 and $37 million in 2011. We record costs to reduce the carrying value of long-lived assets in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as “Operating, general and administrative” expense.

The factors that most significantly affect the impairment calculation are our estimates of future cash flows. Our cash flow projections look several years into the future and include assumptions on variables such as inflation, the economy and market competition. Application of alternative assumptions and definitions, such as reviewing long-lived assets for impairment at a different level, could produce significantly different results.

Goodwill

Our goodwill totaled $2.1 billion as of February 1, 2014. We review goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year, and also upon the occurrence of triggering events. We perform reviews of each of our operating divisions and variable interest entities (collectively, our reporting units) that have goodwill balances. Fair value is determined using a multiple of earnings, or discounted projected future cash flows, and we compare fair value to the carrying value of a reporting unit for purposes of identifying potential impairment. We base projected future cash flows on management’s knowledge of the current operating environment and expectations for the future. If we identify potential for impairment, we measure the fair value of a reporting unit against the fair value of its underlying assets and liabilities, excluding goodwill, to estimate an implied fair value of the division’s goodwill. We recognize goodwill impairment for any excess of the carrying value of the division’s goodwill over the implied fair value.

In 2013, goodwill increased $901 million due to our merger with Harris Teeter which closed on January 28, 2014. For additional information related to the allocation of the Harris Teeter purchase price, refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The annual evaluation of goodwill performed for our other reporting units during the fourth quarter of 2013, 2012 and 2011 did not result in impairment. Based on current and future expected cash flows, we believe goodwill impairments are not reasonably likely. A 10% reduction in fair value of our reporting units would not indicate a potential for impairment of our goodwill balance.

For additional information relating to our results of the goodwill impairment reviews performed during 2013, 2012 and 2011 see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The impairment review requires the extensive use of management judgment and financial estimates. Application of alternative estimates and assumptions, such as reviewing goodwill for impairment at a different level, could produce significantly different results. The cash flow projections embedded in our goodwill impairment reviews can be affected by several factors such as inflation, business valuations in the market, the economy and market competition.

Store Closing Costs

We provide for closed store liabilities on the basis of the present value of the estimated remaining non-cancellable lease payments after the closing date, net of estimated subtenant income. We estimate the net lease liabilities using a discount rate to calculate the present value of the remaining net rent payments on closed stores. We usually pay closed store lease liabilities over the lease terms associated with the closed stores, which generally have remaining terms ranging from one to 20 years. Adjustments to closed store liabilities primarily relate to changes in subtenant income and actual exit costs differing from original estimates. We make adjustments for changes in estimates in the period in which the change becomes known. We review store closing liabilities quarterly to ensure that any accrued amount that is not a sufficient estimate of future costs, or that no longer is needed for its originally intended purpose, is adjusted to earnings in the proper period.

We estimate subtenant income, future cash flows and asset recovery values based on our experience and knowledge of the market in which the closed store is located, our previous efforts to dispose of similar assets and current economic conditions. The ultimate cost of the disposition of the leases and the related assets is affected by current real estate markets, inflation rates and general economic conditions.

We reduce owned stores held for disposal to their estimated net realizable value. We account for costs to reduce the carrying values of property, equipment and leasehold improvements in accordance with our policy on impairment of long-lived assets. We classify inventory write-downs in connection with store closings, if any, in “Merchandise costs.” We expense costs to transfer inventory and equipment from closed stores as they are incurred.

Post-Retirement Benefit Plans

We account for our defined benefit pension plans using the recognition and disclosure provisions of GAAP, which require the recognition of the funded status of retirement plans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We record, as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”), actuarial gains or losses, prior service costs or credits and transition obligations that have not yet been recognized.

The determination of our obligation and expense for Company-sponsored pension plans and other post-retirement benefits is dependent upon our selection of assumptions used by actuaries in calculating those amounts. Those assumptions are described in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and include, among others, the discount rate, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, average life expectancy and the rate of increases in compensation and health care costs. Actual results that differ from our assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect our recognized expense and recorded obligation in future periods. While we believe that our assumptions are appropriate, significant differences in our actual experience or significant changes in our assumptions, including the discount rate used and the expected return on plan assets, may materially affect our pension and other post-retirement obligations and our future expense. Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements discusses the effect of a 1% change in the assumed health care cost trend rate on other post-retirement benefit costs and the related liability.

The objective of our discount rate assumptions was intended to reflect the rates at which the pension benefits could be effectively settled. In making this determination, we take into account the timing and amount of benefits that would be available under the plans. Our methodology for selecting the discount rates as of year-end 2013 and 2012 was to match the plan’s cash flows to that of a hypothetical bond portfolio whose cash flow from coupons and maturities match the plan’s projected benefit cash flows. The discount rates are the single rates that produce the same present value of cash flows. The selection of the 4.99% and 4.68% discount rates as of year-end 2013 for pension and other benefits, respectively, represents the hypothetical bond portfolio using bonds with an AA or better rating constructed with the assistance of an outside consultant. We utilized a discount rate of 4.29% and 4.11% as of year-end 2012 for pension and other benefits, respectively. A 100 basis point increase in the discount rate would decrease the projected pension benefit obligation as of February 1, 2014, by approximately $395.

To determine the expected rate of return on pension plan assets held by Kroger for 2013, we considered current and forecasted plan asset allocations as well as historical and forecasted rates of return on various asset categories. Due to the Harris Teeter merger occurring close to year end, the expected rate of return on pension plan assets acquired in the Harris Teeter merger did not affect our net periodic benefit cost in 2013. For 2013 and 2012, we assumed a pension plan investment return rate of 8.5%. Our pension plan’s average rate of return was 8.1% for the 10 calendar years ended December 31, 2013, net of all investment management fees and expenses. The value of all investments in our Company-sponsored defined benefit pension plans, excluding pension plan assets acquired in the Harris Teeter merger, during the calendar year ending December 31, 2013, net of investment management fees and expenses, increased 8.0%. For the past 20 years, our average annual rate of return has been 9.2%. Based on the above information and forward looking assumptions for investments made in a manner consistent with our target allocations, we believe an 8.5% rate of return assumption was reasonable for 2013 and 2012. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the asset allocations of pension plan assets.

Sensitivity to changes in the major assumptions used in the calculation of Kroger’s pension plan liabilities is illustrated below (in millions).

	Percentage Point Change		Projected Benefit Obligation Decrease/(Increase)		Expense Decrease/(Increase)
Discount Rate	+/- 1.0	%	$	395/(477)	$	31/$(36)
Expected Return on Assets	+/- 1.0	%	—		$	28/$(28)

We contributed $100 million in 2013, $71 million in 2012 and $52 million in 2011 to our Company-sponsored defined benefit pension plans. We do not expect to make any contributions to Company-sponsored defined benefit pension plans in 2014. Among other things, investment performance of plan assets, the interest rates required to be used to calculate the pension obligations, and future changes in legislation, will determine the amounts of contributions.

We contributed and expensed $148 million in 2013, $140 million in 2012 and $130 million in 2011 to employee 401(k) retirement savings accounts. The 401(k) retirement savings account plans provide to eligible employees both matching contributions and automatic contributions from the Company based on participant contributions, plan compensation, and length of service.

Multi-Employer Pension Plans

We also contribute to various multi-employer pension plans based on obligations arising from collective bargaining agreements. These plans provide retirement benefits to participants based on their service to contributing employers. The benefits are paid from assets held in trust for that purpose. Trustees are appointed in equal number by employers and unions. The trustees typically are responsible for determining the level of benefits to be provided to participants as well as for such matters as the investment of the assets and the administration of the plans.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, we entered into a memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) with 14 locals of the UFCW that participated in four multi-employer pension funds. The MOU established a process that amended each of the collective bargaining agreements between Kroger and the UFCW locals under which we made contributions to these funds and consolidated the four multi-employer pension funds into one multi-employer pension fund.

Under the terms of the MOU, the locals of the UFCW agreed to a future pension benefit formula through 2021. We are designated as the named fiduciary of the new consolidated pension plan with sole investment authority over the assets. We committed to contribute sufficient funds to cover the actuarial cost of current accruals and to fund the pre-consolidation Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (“UAAL”) that existed as of December 31, 2011, in a series of installments on or before March 31, 2018. At January 1, 2012, the UAAL was estimated to be $911 million (pre-tax). In accordance with GAAP, we expensed $911 million in 2011 related to the UAAL. The expense was based on a preliminary estimate of the contractual commitment. In 2012, we finalized the UAAL contractual commitment and recorded an adjustment that reduced our 2011 estimated commitment by $53 million (pre-tax). The final UAAL contractual commitment, at January 1, 2012, was $858 million (pre-tax). In the fourth quarter of 2011, we contributed $650 million to the consolidated multi-employer pension plan of which $600 million was allocated to the UAAL and $50 million was allocated to service and interest costs and expensed in 2011. In the fourth quarter of 2012, we contributed $258 million to the consolidated multi-employer pension plan to fully fund our UAAL contractual commitment. Future contributions will be dependent, among other things, on the investment performance of assets in the plan. The funding commitments under the MOU replace the prior commitments under the four existing funds to pay an agreed upon amount per hour worked by eligible employees.

We recognize expense in connection with these plans as contributions are funded or, in the case of the UFCW consolidated pension plan, when commitments are made, in accordance with GAAP. We made cash contributions to these plans of $228 million in 2013, $492 million in 2012 and $946 million in 2011. The cash contributions for 2012 and 2011 include our $258 million contribution in 2012 and our $650 million contribution in 2011 to the UFCW consolidated pension plan in the fourth quarter of each year.

Based on the most recent information available to us, we believe that the present value of actuarially accrued liabilities in most of the multi-employer plans to which we contribute substantially exceeds the value of the assets held in trust to pay benefits. We have attempted to estimate the amount by which these liabilities exceed the assets, (i.e., the amount of underfunding), as of December 31, 2013. Because Kroger is only one of a number of employers contributing to these plans, we also have attempted to estimate the ratio of Kroger’s contributions to the total of all contributions to these plans in a year as a way of assessing Kroger’s “share” of the underfunding. Nonetheless, the underfunding is not a direct obligation or liability of Kroger or of any employer except as noted above. As of December 31, 2013, we estimate that Kroger’s share of the underfunding of multi-employer plans to which Kroger contributes was $1.6 billion, pre-tax, or $1.0 billion, after-tax. This represents a decrease in the estimated amount of underfunding of approximately $150 million, pre-tax, or $95 million, after-tax, as of December 31, 2013, compared to December 31, 2012. The decrease in the amount of underfunding is attributable to the increased returns on the assets held in the multi-employer plans during 2013. Our estimate is based on the most current information available to us including actuarial evaluations and other data (that include the estimates of others), and such information may be outdated or otherwise unreliable.

We have made and disclosed this estimate not because, except as noted above, this underfunding is a direct liability of Kroger. Rather, we believe the underfunding is likely to have important consequences. In 2013, excluding all payments to the UFCW consolidated pension plan and the pension plans that were consolidated into the UFCW consolidated pension plan, our contributions to these plans increased approximately 5% over the prior year and have grown at a compound annual rate of approximately 8% since 2008. In 2014, we expect to contribute approximately $250 million to multi-employer pension plans, subject to collective bargaining and capital market conditions. Excluding all payments to the UFCW consolidated pension plan and the pension plans that were consolidated into the UFCW consolidated pension plan, based on current market conditions, we expect increases in expense as a result of increases in multi-employer pension plan contributions over the next few years. Finally, underfunding means that, in the event we were to exit certain markets or otherwise cease making contributions to these funds, we could trigger a substantial withdrawal liability. Any adjustment for withdrawal liability will be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably estimated, in accordance with GAAP.

The amount of underfunding described above is an estimate and could change based on contract negotiations, returns on the assets held in the multi-employer plans and benefit payments. The amount could decline, and Kroger’s future expense would be favorably affected, if the values of the assets held in the trust significantly increase or if further changes occur through collective bargaining, trustee action or favorable legislation. On the other hand, Kroger’s share of the underfunding could increase and Kroger’s future expense could be adversely affected if the asset values decline, if employers currently contributing to these funds cease participation or if changes occur through collective bargaining, trustee action or adverse legislation. The Company continues to evaluate our potential exposure to under-funded multi-employer pension plans. Although these liabilities are not a direct obligation or liability of Kroger, any commitments to fund certain multi-employer plans will be expensed when our commitment is probable and an estimate can be made.

See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information relating to our participation in these multi-employer pension plans.

Deferred Rent

We recognize rent holidays, including the time period during which we have access to the property for construction of buildings or improvements, as well as construction allowances and escalating rent provisions on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The deferred amount is included in Other Current Liabilities and Other Long-Term Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Uncertain Tax Positions

We review the tax positions taken or expected to be taken on tax returns to determine whether and to what extent a benefit can be recognized in our consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the amount of unrecognized tax benefits and other related disclosures related to uncertain tax positions.

Various taxing authorities periodically audit our income tax returns. These audits include questions regarding our tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income to various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposures connected with these various tax filing positions, including state and local taxes, we record allowances for probable exposures. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which an allowance has been established, is audited and fully resolved. As of February 1, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service had concluded its field examination of our 2008 and 2009 federal tax returns. We have filed an administrative appeal with the Internal Revenue Service protesting certain adjustments proposed by the Internal Revenue Service as a result of their field work.

The assessment of our tax position relies on the judgment of management to estimate the exposures associated with our various filing positions.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

We account for stock options under the fair value recognition provisions of GAAP. Under this method, we recognize compensation expense for all share-based payments granted. We recognize share-based compensation expense, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, over the requisite service period of the award. In addition, we record expense for restricted stock awards in an amount equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date of the award, over the period the award restrictions lapse.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally on a LIFO basis) or market. In total, approximately 95% of inventories in 2013 and 96% of inventories in 2012 were valued using the LIFO method. Cost for the balance of the inventories, including substantially all fuel inventories, was determined using the FIFO method. Replacement cost was higher than the carrying amount by $1.2 billion at February 1, 2014 and by $1.1 billion at February 2, 2013. We follow the Link-Chain, Dollar-Value LIFO method for purposes of calculating our LIFO charge or credit.

We follow the item-cost method of accounting to determine inventory cost before the LIFO adjustment for substantially all store inventories at our supermarket divisions. This method involves counting each item in inventory, assigning costs to each of these items based on the actual purchase costs (net of vendor allowances and cash discounts) of each item and recording the cost of items sold. The item-cost method of accounting allows for more accurate reporting of periodic inventory balances and enables management to more precisely manage inventory. In addition, substantially all of our inventory consists of finished goods and is recorded at actual purchase costs (net of vendor allowances and cash discounts).

We evaluate inventory shortages throughout the year based on actual physical counts in our facilities. We record allowances for inventory shortages based on the results of recent physical counts to provide for estimated shortages from the last physical count to the financial statement date.

Vendor Allowances

We recognize all vendor allowances as a reduction in merchandise costs when the related product is sold. In most cases, vendor allowances are applied to the related product cost by item, and therefore reduce the carrying value of inventory by item. When it is not practicable to allocate vendor allowances to the product by item, we recognize vendor allowances as a reduction in merchandise costs based on inventory turns and as the product is sold. We recognized approximately $6.2 billion in 2013 and 2012 and $5.9 billion in 2011 of vendor allowances as a reduction in merchandise costs. We recognized approximately 94% of all vendor allowances in the item cost with the remainder being based on inventory turns.

RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In February 2013, the FASB amended its standards on comprehensive income by requiring disclosure of information about amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) by component. Specifically, the amendment requires disclosure of the effect of significant reclassifications out of AOCI on the respective line items in net income in which the item was reclassified if the amount being reclassified is required to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. It requires cross reference to other disclosures that provide additional detail for amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety in the same reporting period. This new disclosure became effective for us beginning February 3, 2013, and is being adopted prospectively in accordance with the standard. See Note 9 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the Company’s new disclosures related to this amended standard.

In December 2011, the FASB amended its standards related to offsetting assets and liabilities. This amendment requires entities to disclose both gross and net information about certain instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and certain instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting agreement. This information is intended to enable users of the financial statements to understand the effect of these arrangements on our financial position. The new rules became effective for us on February 3, 2013. In January 2013, the FASB further amended this standard to limit its scope to derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, securities borrowings and lending transactions. See Note 7 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the Company’s new disclosures related to this amended standard.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In July 2013, the FASB amended Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740, “Income Taxes.” The amendments provide guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit, as either a reduction of a deferred tax asset or as a liability, when a net operating loss carryforward, similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The amendments will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2013 and may be applied on a retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of these amendments to have a significant effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Flow Information

Net cash provided by operating activities

We generated $3.4 billion of cash from operations in 2013, compared to $2.8 billion in 2012 and $2.7 billion in 2011. The cash provided by operating activities came from net earnings including non-controlling interests adjusted primarily for non-cash expenses of depreciation and amortization, the LIFO charge and changes in working capital. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in 2013, compared to 2012, resulted primarily due to changes in working capital and long-term liabilities. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in 2012, compared to 2011, resulted primarily due to an increase in net earnings including non-controlling interests, offset by a decline in long-term liabilities and changes in working capital.

The use of cash for the payment of long-term liabilities decreased in 2013, as compared to 2012, primarily due to our funding of the remaining UAAL in 2012. The use of cash increased in 2012, as compared to 2011, primarily due to our funding of the remaining UAAL commitment. Changes in working capital used cash from operating activities of $130 million in 2013, compared to $332 million in 2012 and $300 million in 2011. The decreased use of cash for changes in working capital in 2013, compared to 2012, was primarily due to a decrease in deposits in-transit and a reduced use of cash for prepaid expenses and receivables. The increased use of cash for changes in working capital in 2012, compared to 2011, was primarily due to an increased use of cash for prepaid expenses and less cash provided by accrued expenses, partially offset by a reduced use of cash for inventories. Cash used for prepaid expenses increased in 2012, compared to 2011, due to Kroger prefunding $250 million of employee benefits at the end of 2012. These amounts are also net of cash contributions to our Company-sponsored defined benefit pension plans totaling $100 million in 2013, $71 million in 2012 and $52 million in 2011.

The amount of cash paid for income taxes increased in 2013, compared to 2012, primarily due to additional deductions taken in 2012 related to the funding of our pension contributions and union health benefits. The amount of cash paid for income taxes increased in 2012, compared to 2011, primarily due to an increase in net earnings including non-controlling interests.

Net cash used by investing activities

Cash used by investing activities was $4.8 billion in 2013, compared to $2.2 billion in 2012 and $1.9 billion in 2011. The amount of cash used by investing activities increased in 2013, compared to 2012, due to increased payments for capital investments and acquisitions. The amount of cash used by investing activities increased in 2012, compared to 2011, due to increased payments for capital investments and acquisitions. Capital investments, including changes in construction-in-progress payables and excluding acquisitions, were $2.4 billion in 2013, $2.1 billion in 2012 and $2.0 billion in 2011. Acquisitions were $2.3 billion in 2013, $122 million in 2012 and $51 million in 2011. The increase in payments for acquisitions in 2013, compared to 2012 was primarily due to our merger with Harris Teeter. Refer to the “Capital Investments” section for an overview of our supermarket storing activity during the last three years.

Net cash used by financing activities

Financing activities provided (used) cash of $1.6 billion in 2013, ($600) million in 2012 and ($1.4) billion in 2011. The increase in cash provided by financing activities in 2013, compared to 2012, was primarily related to increased proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, primarily to finance our merger with Harris Teeter, and a reduction in payments on long-term debt and treasury stock purchases, offset partially by net payments on our commercial paper program. The decrease in the amount of cash used for financing activities in 2012, compared to 2011, was primarily related to increased proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and net borrowings from our commercial paper program, offset partially by payments on long-term debt. Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt were $3.5 billion in 2013, $863 million in 2012 and $453 million in 2011. Proceeds (payments) provided from our commercial paper program were ($395) million in 2013, $1.3 billion in 2012 and $370 million in 2011. Please refer to the “Debt Management” section for additional information. We repurchased $609 million of Kroger common shares in 2013, compared to $1.3 billion in 2012 and $1.5 billion in 2011. We paid dividends totaling $319 million in 2013, $267 million in 2012 and $257 million in 2011.

Debt Management

Total debt, including both the current and long-term portions of capital lease and lease-financing obligations increased $2.4 billion to $11.3 billion as of year-end 2013, compared to 2012. The increase in 2013, compared to 2012, resulted from the issuance of (i) $600 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 3.85%, (ii) $400 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 5.15%, (iii) $500 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 3-month London Inter-Bank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 53 basis points, (iv) $300 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 1.2%, (v) $500 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 2.3%, (vi) $700 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 3.3%, and (vii) $500 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 4.0%, offset partially by a reduction in commercial paper of $395 million and payments at maturity of $400 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 5.0% and $600 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 7.5%. This increase in financing obligations was due to partially funding our merger with Harris Teeter, refinancing our debt maturities in 2013 and replacing the senior notes that matured in fourth quarter of 2012, offset partially by the payment at maturity of our $400 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 5.0%, $600 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 7.5% and a reduction in commercial paper of $395 million.

Total debt, including both the current and long-term portions of capital leases and lease-financing obligations increased $714 million to $8.9 billion as of year-end 2012, compared to 2011. The increase in 2012, compared to 2011, resulted from increased borrowings of $1.3 billion of commercial paper supported by our credit facility and the issuance of (i) $500 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 3.4% and (ii) $350 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 5.0%, offset partially by payments at maturity of (i) $491 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 6.75%, (ii) $346 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 6.2% and (iii) $500 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 5.5%. This increase in financing obligations was primarily to fund our $258 million UFCW consolidated pension plan contribution in the fourth quarter of 2012, prefunding $250 million of employee benefit costs at the end of 2012, to repurchase common shares, pay at maturity $500 million of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 5.5% and purchase of a specialty pharmacy.

Liquidity Needs

We estimate our liquidity needs over the next twelve-month period to be approximately $4.5 billion, which includes anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, interest payments and scheduled principal payments of debt and commercial paper, offset by cash and temporary cash investments on hand at the end of 2013. Based on current operating trends, we believe that cash flows from operating activities and other sources of liquidity, including borrowings under our commercial paper program and bank credit facility, will be adequate to meet our liquidity needs for the next twelve months and for the foreseeable future beyond the next twelve months. We have approximately $1.2 billion of commercial paper and $300 million of senior notes maturing in the next twelve months, which is included in the $4.5 billion in estimated liquidity needs. We expect to refinance this debt, in 2014, by issuing additional senior notes or commercial paper on favorable terms based on our past experience. We also currently plan to continue repurchases of common shares under the Company’s share repurchase programs. We may use our commercial paper program to fund debt maturities during 2014 but do not currently expect to use the program permanently. We believe we have adequate coverage of our debt covenants to continue to maintain our current debt ratings and to respond effectively to competitive conditions.

Factors Affecting Liquidity

We can currently borrow on a daily basis approximately $2 billion under our commercial paper (“CP”) program. At February 1, 2014, we had $1.2 billion of CP borrowings outstanding. CP borrowings are backed by our credit facility, and reduce the amount we can borrow under the credit facility. If our short-term credit ratings fall, the ability to borrow under our current CP program could be adversely affected for a period of time and increase our interest cost on daily borrowings under our CP program. This could require us to borrow additional funds under the credit facility, under which we believe we have sufficient capacity. However, in the event of a ratings decline, we do not anticipate that our borrowing capacity under our CP program would be any lower than $500 million on a daily basis. Although our ability to borrow under the credit facility is not affected by our credit rating, the interest cost on borrowings under the credit facility could be affected by an increase in our Leverage Ratio. As of March 28, 2014, we had $665 million of CP borrowings outstanding. The decrease as of March 28, 2014, compared to year-end 2013, was due to applying cash from operations against our year-end CP outstanding borrowings.

Our credit facility requires the maintenance of a Leverage Ratio and a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (our “financial covenants”). A failure to maintain our financial covenants would impair our ability to borrow under the credit facility. These financial covenants and ratios are described below:

· Our Leverage Ratio (the ratio of Net Debt to Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the credit facility) was 2.30 to 1 as of February 1, 2014. If this ratio were to exceed 3.50 to 1, we would be in default of our credit facility and our ability to borrow under the facility would be impaired. In addition, our Applicable Margin on borrowings is determined by our Leverage Ratio.

· Our Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (the ratio of Consolidated EBITDA plus Consolidated Rental Expense to Consolidated Cash Interest Expense plus Consolidated Rental Expense, as defined in the credit facility) was 4.83 to 1 as of February 1, 2014. If this ratio fell below 1.70 to 1, we would be in default of our credit facility and our ability to borrow under the facility would be impaired.

Our credit agreement is more fully described in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We were in compliance with our financial covenants at year-end 2013.

The tables below illustrate our significant contractual obligations and other commercial commitments, based on year of maturity or settlement, as of February 1, 2014 (in millions of dollars):

	2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		Thereafter		Total
Contractual Obligations (1) (2)
Long-term debt(3)	$	1,616	$	524	$	1,267	$	708	$	1,003	$	5,662	$	10,780
Interest on long-term debt (4)	427		364		349		321		278		1,352		3,091
Capital lease obligations	62		57		53		52		43		349		616
Operating lease obligations	832		770		708		634		563		3,101		6,608
Low-income housing obligations	3		—		—		—		—		—		3
Financed lease obligations	13		13		13		13		13		111		176
Self-insurance liability (5)	224		131		88		52		26		48		569
Construction commitments	313		—		—		—		—		—		313
Purchase obligations	549		135		82		57		39		87		949

Total	$	4,039	$	1,994	$	2,560	$	1,837	$	1,965	$	10,710	$	23,105

Other Commercial Commitments
Standby letters of credit	$	209	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	209
Surety bonds	310		—		—		—		—		—		310

Total	$	519	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	519

(1) The contractual obligations table excludes funding of pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, which totaled approximately $125 million in 2013. This table also excludes contributions under various multi-employer pension plans, which totaled $228 million in 2013.

(2) The liability related to unrecognized tax benefits has been excluded from the contractual obligations table because a reasonable estimate of the timing of future tax settlements cannot be determined.

(3) As of February 1, 2014, we had $1.2 billion of borrowings of commercial paper and no borrowings under our credit agreement and money market lines.

(4) Amounts include contractual interest payments using the interest rate as of February 1, 2014, and stated fixed and swapped interest rates, if applicable, for all other debt instruments.

(5) The amounts included in the contractual obligations table for self-insurance liability related to workers’ compensation claims have been stated on a present value basis.

Our construction commitments include funds owed to third parties for projects currently under construction. These amounts are reflected in other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Our purchase obligations include commitments, many of which are short-term in nature, to be utilized in the normal course of business, such as several contracts to purchase raw materials utilized in our manufacturing plants and several contracts to purchase energy to be used in our stores and manufacturing facilities. Our obligations also include management fees for facilities operated by third parties and outside service contracts. Any upfront vendor allowances or incentives associated with outstanding purchase commitments are recorded as either current or long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

As of February 1, 2014, we maintained a $2 billion (with the ability to increase by $500 million), unsecured revolving credit facility that, unless extended, terminates on January 25, 2017. Outstanding borrowings under the credit agreement and commercial paper borrowings, and some outstanding letters of credit, reduce funds available under the credit agreement. In addition to the credit agreement, we maintain two uncommitted money market lines totaling $75 million in the aggregate. The money market lines allow us to borrow from banks at mutually agreed upon rates, usually at rates below the rates offered under the credit agreement. As of February 1, 2014, we had $1.2 billion of borrowings of commercial paper and no borrowings under our credit agreement and money market lines. The outstanding letters of credit that reduce funds available under our credit agreement totaled $12 million as of February 1, 2014.

In addition to the available credit mentioned above, as of February 1, 2014, we had authorized for issuance $2.5 billion of securities under a shelf registration statement filed with the SEC and effective on December 13, 2013.

OUTLOOK

This discussion and analysis contains certain forward-looking statements about Kroger’s future performance, including Harris Teeter. These statements are based on management’s assumptions and beliefs in light of the information currently available. Such statements are indicated by words such as “comfortable,” “committed,” “will,” “expect,” “goal,” “should,” “intend,” “target,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” and similar words or phrases. These forward-looking statements are subject to uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially.

Statements elsewhere in this report and below regarding our expectations, projections, beliefs, intentions or strategies are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. While we believe that the statements are accurate, uncertainties about the general economy, our labor relations, our ability to execute our plans on a timely basis and other uncertainties described below could cause actual results to differ materially.

· We expect net earnings per diluted share in the range of $3.14-$3.25 for fiscal year 2014.

· In 2014, we expect net earnings per diluted share growth of 10 — 14%, which includes the expected accretion to net earnings from the Harris Teeter merger. Thereafter, we would expect to return to our 8 — 11% long-term growth rate.

· We expect identical supermarket sales growth, excluding fuel sales, of 2.5%-3.5% in fiscal year 2014.

· We expect full-year FIFO non-fuel operating margin for 2014 to expand slightly compared to 2013, excluding the 2013 adjusted items.

· For 2014, we expect our annualized LIFO charge to be approximately $55 million.

· For 2014, we expect interest expense to be approximately $490 million.

· We plan to use cash flow primarily for capital investments, to improve our current debt coverage ratios, to pay cash dividends and to repurchase stock.

· We expect to obtain sales growth from new square footage, as well as from increased productivity from existing locations.

· We expect capital investments for 2014 to increase to approximately $2.8 - $3.0 billion, excluding mergers, acquisitions and purchases of leased facilities. We also expect capital investments to increase incrementally $200 million each year over the next few years, excluding mergers, acquisitions and purchases of leased facilities, to accomplish our strategy. We expect total food store square footage for 2014 to grow approximately 1.8% before mergers, acquisitions and operational closings.

· For 2014, we expect our effective tax rate to be approximately 35.0%, excluding the unexpected effect of the resolution of any tax issues and benefits from certain tax items.

· We do not anticipate goodwill impairments in 2014.

· For 2014, we expect to contribute approximately $250 million to multi-employer pension funds. We continue to evaluate our potential exposure to under-funded multi-employer pension plans. Although these liabilities are not a direct obligation or liability of Kroger, any commitments to fund certain multi-employer plans will be expensed when our commitment is probable and an estimate can be made.

· In 2014, we will negotiate agreements with the UFCW for store associates in Cincinnati, Atlanta, Southern California, New Mexico, Richmond/Hampton Roads, West Virginia and Arizona, and an agreement with the Teamsters covering several distribution and manufacturing facilities. These negotiations will be challenging, as we must have competitive cost structures in each market while meeting our associates’ needs for good wages and affordable health care. Also, we must address the underfunding of multi-employer pension plans.

Various uncertainties and other factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. These include:

· The extent to which our sources of liquidity are sufficient to meet our requirements may be affected by the state of the financial markets and the effect that such condition has on our ability to issue commercial paper at acceptable rates. Our ability to borrow under our committed lines of credit, including our bank credit facilities, could be impaired if one or more of our lenders under those lines is unwilling or unable to honor its contractual obligation to lend to us, or in the event that natural disasters or weather conditions interfere with the ability of our lenders to lend to us. Our ability to refinance maturing debt may be affected by the state of the financial markets.

· Our ability to use cash flow to continue to maintain our investment grade debt rating and repurchase shares, pay dividends and fund capital investments, could be affected by unanticipated increases in net total debt, our inability to generate cash flow at the levels anticipated, and our failure to generate expected earnings.

· Our ability to achieve sales, earnings and cash flow goals may be affected by: labor negotiations or disputes; changes in the types and numbers of businesses that compete with us; pricing and promotional activities of existing and new competitors, including non-traditional competitors, and the aggressiveness of that competition; our response to these actions; the state of the economy, including interest rates, the inflationary and deflationary trends in certain commodities, and the unemployment rate; the effect that fuel costs have on consumer spending; changes in government-funded benefit programs; manufacturing commodity costs; diesel fuel costs related to our logistics operations; trends in consumer spending; the extent to which our customers exercise caution in their purchasing in response to economic conditions; the inconsistent pace of the economic recovery; changes in inflation or deflation in product and operating costs; stock repurchases; the effect of brand prescription drugs going off patent; our ability to retain additional pharmacy sales from third party payors; natural disasters or adverse weather conditions; the success of our future growth plans; and the successful integration of Harris Teeter. The extent to which the adjustments we are making to our strategy create value for our shareholders will depend primarily on the reaction of our customers and our competitors to these adjustments, as well as operating conditions, including inflation or deflation, increased competitive activity, and cautious spending behavior of our customers. Our ability to achieve sales and earnings goals may also be affected by our ability to manage the factors identified above.

· During the first three quarters of our fiscal year, our LIFO charge and the recognition of LIFO expense will be affected primarily by estimated year-end changes in product costs. Our LIFO charge for the fiscal year will be affected primarily by changes in product costs at year-end.

· If actual results differ significantly from anticipated future results for certain reporting units including variable interest entities, an impairment loss for any excess of the carrying value of the reporting units’ goodwill over the implied fair value would have to be recognized.

· Our effective tax rate may differ from the expected rate due to changes in laws, the status of pending items with various taxing authorities, and the deductibility of certain expenses.

· The actual amount of automatic and matching cash contributions to our 401(k) Retirement Savings Account Plan will depend on the number of participants, savings rate, compensation as defined by the plan, and length of service of participants.

· Changes in our product mix may negatively affect certain financial indicators. For example, we continue to add supermarket fuel centers to our store base. Since gasoline generates low profit margins, we expect to see our FIFO gross profit margins decline as gasoline sales increase.

We cannot fully foresee the effects of changes in economic conditions on Kroger’s business. We have assumed economic and competitive situations will not change significantly in 2014.

Other factors and assumptions not identified above could also cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking information. Accordingly, actual events and results may vary significantly from those included in, contemplated or implied by forward-looking statements made by us or our representatives. We undertake no obligation to update the forward-looking information contained in this filing.

	February 1, 2014 Expected Year of Maturity
	2014			2015			2016			2017			2018			Thereafter			Total			Fair Value
	(in millions)
Debt
Fixed rate	$	(309	)	$	(515	)	$	(764	)	$	(708	)	$	(1,003	)	$	(5,556	)	$	(8,855	)	$	(9,623	)
Average interest rate	4.75		%	4.75		%	4.92		%	5.09		%	5.12		%	5.30		%
Variable rate	$	(1,307	)	$	(9	)	$	(503	)	$	—		$	—		$	(106	)	$	(1,925	)	$	(1,924	)
Average interest rate	0.87		%	1.16		%	1.83		%	1.63		%	1.95		%	2.41		%

	February 1, 2014 Average Notional Amounts Outstanding																	February 1, 2014		February 1, 2014 Fair
	2014			2015			2016			2017			2018			Thereafter		Total		Value
	(in millions)
Interest Rate Derivatives Classified as Fair Value Hedges
Fixed to variable	$	100		$	100		$	100		$	100		$	88		$	—	$	100	$	(2	)
Average pay rate	5.83		%	5.95		%	6.55		%	7.62		%	8.47		%	—
Average receive rate	6.80		%	6.80		%	6.80		%	6.80		%	6.80		%	—

	February 2, 2013 Expected Year of Maturity
	2013			2014			2015			2016			2017			Thereafter			Total			Fair Value
	(in millions)
Debt
Fixed rate	$	(1,010	)	$	(308	)	$	(508	)	$	(460	)	$	(607	)	$	(3,763	)	$	(6,656	)	$	(7,519	)
Average interest rate	5.72		%	5.67		%	5.77		%	6.04		%	6.23		%	6.38		%
Variable rate	$	(1,690	)	$	(12	)	$	(9	)	$	(3	)	$	—		$	(106	)	$	(1,820	)	$	(1,820	)
Average interest rate	1.02		%	0.73		%	0.78		%	1.02		%	1.28		%	1.77		%

	February 2, 2013 Average Notional Amounts Outstanding																		February 2, 2013		February 2, 2013 Fair
	2013			2014			2015			2016			2017			Thereafter			Total		Value
	(in millions)
Interest Rate Derivatives Classified as Fair Value Hedges
Fixed to variable	$	178		$	100		$	100		$	100		$	100		$	88		$	475	$	1
Average pay rate	4.44		%	5.97		%	6.25		%	6.70		%	7.37		%	7.96		%
Average receive rate	6.01		%	6.80		%	6.80		%	6.80		%	6.80		%	6.80		%

Based on our year-end 2013 variable rate debt levels, a 10 percent change in interest rates would be immaterial. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of derivatives and hedging policies.

Commodity Price Protection

We enter into purchase commitments for various resources, including raw materials utilized in our manufacturing facilities and energy to be used in our stores, warehouses, manufacturing facilities and administrative offices. We enter into commitments expecting to take delivery of and to utilize those resources in the conduct of normal business. Those commitments for which we expect to utilize or take delivery in a reasonable amount of time in the normal course of business qualify as normal purchases.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareowners and Board of Directors of

The Kroger Co.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in shareowners’ equity present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Kroger Co. and its subsidiaries at February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 1, 2014 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2014 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination on January 28, 2014. We have also excluded Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent 12% and less than 1%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended February 1, 2014.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio

April 1, 2014

THE KROGER CO.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	February 1,			February 2,
(In millions, except par values)	2014			2013
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and temporary cash investments	$	401		$	238
Store deposits in-transit	958			955
Receivables	1,116			1,051
FIFO inventory	6,801			6,244
LIFO reserve	(1,150		)	(1,098		)
Prepaid and other current assets	704			569
Total current assets	8,830			7,959

Property, plant and equipment, net	16,893			14,848
Intangibles, net	702			130
Goodwill	2,135			1,234
Other assets	721			463

Total Assets	$	29,281		$	24,634

LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt including obligations under capital leases and financing obligations	$	1,657		$	2,734
Trade accounts payable	4,881			4,484
Accrued salaries and wages	1,150			1,017
Deferred income taxes	248			288
Other current liabilities	2,769			2,538
Total current liabilities	10,705			11,061

Long-term debt including obligations under capital leases and financing obligations
Face-value of long-term debt including obligations under capital leases and financing obligations	9,654			6,141
Adjustment to reflect fair-value interest rate hedges	(1		)	4
Long-term debt including obligations under capital leases and financing obligations	9,653			6,145

Deferred income taxes	1,381			796
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations	901			1,291
Other long-term liabilities	1,246			1,127

Total Liabilities	23,886			20,420

Commitments and contingencies (see Note 13)

SHAREOWNERS’ EQUITY

Preferred shares, $100 par per share, 5 shares authorized and unissued	¾			¾
Common shares, $1 par per share, 1,000 shares authorized; 959 shares issued in 2013 and 2012	959			959
Additional paid-in capital	3,549			3,451
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(464		)	(753		)
Accumulated earnings	10,981			9,787
Common stock in treasury, at cost, 451 shares in 2013 and 445 shares in 2012	(9,641		)	(9,237		)

Total Shareowners’ Equity - The Kroger Co.	5,384			4,207
Noncontrolling interests	11			7

Total Equity	5,395			4,214

Total Liabilities and Equity	$	29,281		$	24,634

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

THE KROGER CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012

(In millions, except per share amounts)	2013 (52 weeks)		2012 (53 weeks)		2011 (52 weeks)
Sales	$	98,375	$	96,619	$	90,269
Merchandise costs, including advertising, warehousing, and transportation, excluding items shown separately below	78,138		76,726		71,389
Operating, general and administrative	15,196		14,849		15,345
Rent	613		628		619
Depreciation	1,703		1,652		1,638

Operating Profit	2,725		2,764		1,278
Interest expense	443		462		435

Earnings before income tax expense	2,282		2,302		843
Income tax expense	751		794		247

Net earnings including noncontrolling interests	1,531		1,508		596
Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests	12		11		(6		)

Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co.	$	1,519	$	1,497	$	602

Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per basic common share	$	2.93	$	2.78	$	1.01

Average number of common shares used in basic calculation	514		533		590

Net earnings attributable to The Kroger Co. per diluted common share	$	2.90	$	2.77	$	1.01

Average number of common shares used in diluted calculation	520		537		593

Dividends declared per common share	$	0.63	$	0.53	$	0.44

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

THE KROGER CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Years Ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012

(In millions)	2013 (52 weeks)			2012 (53 weeks)		2011 (52 weeks)
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests	$	1,531		$	1,508	$	596

Other comprehensive income (loss)
Unrealized gain on available for sale securities, net of income tax(1)	5			¾		2
Change in pension and other postretirement defined benefit plans, net of income tax(2)	295			75		(271		)
Unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedging activities, net of income tax(3)	(12		)	13		(26		)
Amortization of unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedging activities, net of income tax(4)	1			3		1

Total other comprehensive income (loss)	289			91		(294		)

Comprehensive income	1,820			1,599		302
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests	12			11		(6		)
Comprehensive income attributable to The Kroger Co.	$	1,808		$	1,588	$	308

(1)		Amount is net of tax of $3 in 2013 and $1 in 2011.
(2)		Amount is net of tax of $173 in 2013, $45 in 2012 and $(154) in 2011.
(3)		Amount is net of tax of $(8) in 2013, $7 in 2012 and $(15) in 2011.
(4)		Amount is net of tax of $1 in 2013, $2 in 2012 and $1 in 2011.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

THE KROGER CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012

(In millions)	2013 (52 weeks)			2012 (53 weeks)			2011 (52 weeks)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests	$	1,531		$	1,508		$	596
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	1,703			1,652			1,638
Asset impairment charge	39			18			37
LIFO charge	52			55			216
Stock-based employee compensation	107			82			81
Expense for Company-sponsored pension plans	74			89			70
Deferred income taxes	72			176			31
Other	47			23			3
Changes in operating assets and liabilities net of effects from acquisitions of businesses:
Store deposits in-transit	25			(169		)	(120		)
Inventories	(131		)	(78		)	(361		)
Receivables	(8		)	(126		)	(63		)
Prepaid expenses	(49		)	(257		)	52
Trade accounts payable	3			67			83
Accrued expenses	77			67			215
Income taxes receivable and payable	(47		)	164			(106		)
Contribution to Company-sponsored pension plans	(100		)	(71		)	(52		)
Other	(15		)	(367		)	338

Net cash provided by operating activities	3,380			2,833			2,658

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Payments for property and equipment, including payments for lease buyouts	(2,330		)	(2,062		)	(1,898		)
Proceeds from sale of assets	24			49			51
Payments for acquisitions	(2,344		)	(122		)	(51

	Base Period	INDEXED RETURNS Years Ending
Company Name/Index	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013
The Kroger Co.	100	96.85	97.93	113.86	133.45	175.77
S&P 500 Index	100	133.14	162.67	171.34	201.50	242.42
Peer Group	100	123.89	134.49	141.36	170.73	193.17