XML 94 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
CONTINGENCIES
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
CONTINGENCIES [Abstract]  
CONTINGENCIES
(13)CONTINGENCIES

On January 30, 2012 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in a case styled Rescue Mission of El Paso., Inc., et al. v. John J. Nicola, et al., the Company, its subsidiary, K-Sea Transportation Partners L.P. ("K-Sea"), and current and former officers and directors of K-Sea were named defendants in a putative class action complaint asserting that during the period of January 30, 2009 to January 27, 2010, K-Sea allegedly failed to disclose certain facts regarding K-Sea’s operations and financial condition, and asserting violations of Sections 10(b)(5) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Plaintiff sought class certification, compensatory damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. The Plaintiff filed its Amended Consolidated Complaint on behalf of the class on July 9, 2012. The Company filed a motion to dismiss in response to the Complaint. On June 18, 2013, the Court granted the Company's motion to dismiss the case.

The Company is involved in various legal and other proceedings which are incidental to the conduct of its business, none of which in the opinion of management will have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Management believes that it has recorded adequate reserves and believes that it has adequate insurance coverage or has meritorious defenses for these other claims and contingencies.

The Company has issued guaranties or obtained standby letters of credit and performance bonds supporting performance by the Company and its subsidiaries of contractual or contingent legal obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries incurred in the ordinary course of business. The aggregate notional value of these instruments was $45,818,000 at June 30, 2013, including $6,128,000 in letters of credit and $39,690,000 in performance bonds. All of these instruments have an expiration date within five years. The Company does not believe demand for payment under these instruments is likely and expects no material cash outlays to occur in connection with these instruments.