NOMURA PARTNERS FUNDS, INC.

Series of Nomura Partners Funds, Inc.	Class A	Class C	Class I	Class S
THE JAPAN FUND	NPJAX	NPJCX	NPJIX	SJPNX
ASIA PACIFIC EX JAPAN FUND	NPAAX	NPACX	NPAIX
INDIA FUND	NPIAX	NPICX	NPIIX
GREATER CHINA FUND	NPCAX	NPCCX	NPCIX
GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME FUND	NPWAX	NPWCX	NPWIX
GLOBAL EMERGING MARKETS FUND	NPEAX	NPECX	NPEIX
GLOBAL ALPHA EQUITY FUND	NPGAX	NPGCX	NPGIX
INTERNATIONAL GROWTH EQUITY FUND	NPLAX	NPLCX	NPLIX
INTERNATIONAL EQUITY FUND	NPQAX	NPQCX	NPQIX

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

January 28, 2010

Amended and restated June 1, 2010

Nomura Partners Funds, Inc. (the “Corporation”) is an open-end management investment company that currently consists of nine series which are described in this Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”). Each series except the Greater China Fund and the India Fund is diversified. This SAI relates to the Class A, Class C and Class I shares of each of The Japan Fund, the Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund, the India Fund, the Greater China Fund, the Global Equity Income Fund, the Global Emerging Markets Fund, the Global Alpha Equity Fund, the International Growth Equity Fund and the International Equity Fund, as well as the Class S shares of The Japan Fund.

This SAI is not a prospectus and should be read in conjunction with the prospectus for the Corporation dated January 28, 2010 (the “Prospectus”) and as further amended from time to time. The Annual Report to Shareholders of the Corporation dated September 30, 2009 and the Semi-Annual Report to Shareholders of the Corporation dated March 31, 2009, are incorporated by reference and hereby deemed to be part of this SAI. A copy of the Prospectus and the Annual and Semi-Annual Reports to Shareholders may be obtained without charge by calling toll-free 1-800-535-2726.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
NOMURA PARTNERS FUNDS, INC.	1
INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS	1
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND STRATEGIES	2
RISKS OF INVESTMENT	13
THE INVESTMENT ADVISOR AND THE SUB-ADVISORS	17
PORTFOLIO MANAGERS	20
CONTROL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISOR AND THE SUB-ADVISORS	28
CODE OF ETHICS	28
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS	28
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS	31
THE DISTRIBUTOR	33
THE DISTRIBUTION AND SHAREHOLDER SERVICING PLANS	33
PAYMENTS TO INTERMEDIARIES	37
THE TRANSFER AGENT	38
THE CUSTODIAN	38
THE ADMINISTRATOR	38
COMPLIANCE SERVICES	39
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	39
LEGAL COUNSEL	40
PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF SHARES	40
TAXES	45
NET ASSET VALUE	54
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF THE FUND	56
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS	68
ORGANIZATION OF THE FUND	73
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	73
PROXY VOTING	74
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	74
APPENDIX A–PROXY VOTING POLICY OF NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT CO., LTD., NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT U.S.A. INC., NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT U.K. LIMITED, NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE LIMITED, NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT MALAYSIA SDN BHD., NOMURA ISLAMIC ASSET MANAGEMENT SDN BHD. AND NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT HONG KONG LIMITED	A-1
APPENDIX B–PROXY VOTING POLICY OF MARTIN CURRIE INC.	B-1
APPENDIX C–PROXY VOTING POLICY OF MCKINLEY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC	C-1

i

NOMURA PARTNERS FUNDS, INC.

The Corporation is an open-end management investment company that continually offers and redeems its shares. It is a company of the type commonly known as a mutual fund. The Corporation was organized as a Maryland corporation in 1961 as The Japan Fund, Inc. Effective as of December 1, 2008, the Corporation changed its name to Nomura Partners Funds, Inc. Currently, the Corporation consists of the following nine series (each a “Fund” and collectively the “Funds”):

The Japan Fund

Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund

India Fund

Greater China Fund

Global Equity Income Fund

Global Emerging Markets Fund

Global Alpha Equity Fund

International Growth Equity Fund

International Equity Fund

Each Fund is classified as “diversified” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), except for the India Fund and the Greater China Fund, which are non-diversified. Diversified means that at least 75% of the value of a Fund’s total assets must be comprised of (i) cash and cash items, (ii) securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities, (iii) securities of other investment companies, or (iv) other securities, provided that no more than 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets are invested in the securities of a single issuer and the Fund does not own more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of a single issuer. The remaining 25% of the value of a diversified Fund’s total assets may be invested in a single issuer, or in multiple issuers not subject to the above limitations. Each Fund intends to qualify for the special tax treatment available to “regulated investment companies” under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and thus intends to satisfy the diversification requirements of Subchapter M. See “Taxes.”

INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS

The following policies and limitations supplement those set forth in the Prospectus. Unless otherwise noted, whenever an investment policy or limitation states a maximum percentage of a Fund’s assets that may be invested in any security or other asset, or sets forth a policy regarding quality standards, such standard or percentage limitation will be determined immediately after and as a result of the Fund’s acquisition of such security or other asset. Accordingly, any subsequent change in values, net assets, or other circumstances will not be considered when determining whether the investment complies with the Fund’s investment policies and limitations.

Each Fund’s fundamental investment limitations as listed below and the investment objectives restated in the “Investment Objectives, Policies and Strategies — Investment Objectives” section beginning on page 2 cannot be changed without approval by a “majority of the outstanding voting securities” of the applicable Fund. Under the 1940 Act, “a majority of the outstanding voting securities” of a Fund is the lesser of (a) 67% or more of the voting securities present at a meeting of shareholders, if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of a Fund are present or represented by proxy, or (b) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of a Fund.

The following are each Fund’s fundamental investment limitations set forth in their entirety. Each Fund may not:

(a) borrow money, except as permitted under the 1940 Act and as interpreted or modified by regulatory authority having jurisdiction, from time to time;

(b) issue senior securities, except as permitted under the 1940 Act and as interpreted or modified by regulatory authority having jurisdiction, from time to time;

(c) purchase physical commodities or contracts relating to physical commodities unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments;

(d) engage in the business of underwriting securities issued by others, except to the extent that the Fund may be deemed to be an underwriter in connection with the disposition of portfolio securities;

(e) purchase or sell real estate, which term does not include securities of companies which deal in real estate or mortgages or investments secured by real estate or interests therein, except that the Fund reserves freedom of action to hold and to sell real estate acquired as a result of the Fund’s ownership of securities;

1

(f) make loans to other persons except (i) loans of portfolio securities, and (ii) to the extent that entry into repurchase agreements and the purchase of debt instruments or interests in indebtedness in accordance with the Fund’s investment objective and policies may be deemed to be loans; or

(g) concentrate its investments in a particular industry, as that term is used in the 1940 Act, and as interpreted or modified by regulatory authority having jurisdiction, from time to time.

All other investment policies and limitations described in this SAI, including those listed below, are not fundamental and may be changed without shareholder approval. Each Fund may not:

(1) invest more than 20% of its total assets in debt securities of both foreign and domestic issuers;

(2) borrow money in an amount greater than 5% of its total assets, except (i) for temporary or emergency purposes, and (ii) by engaging in reverse repurchase agreements, dollar rolls, or other investments or transactions described in the Fund’s registration statement which may be deemed to be borrowings;

(3) enter into either of reverse repurchase agreements or dollar rolls in an amount greater than 5% of its total assets;

(4) purchase securities on margin or make short sales, except (i) short sales against the box, (ii) in connection with arbitrage transactions, (iii) for margin deposits in connection with futures contracts, options or other permitted investments, (iv) that transactions in futures contracts and options shall not be deemed to constitute selling securities short, and (v) that the Fund may obtain such short-term credits as may be necessary for the clearance of securities transactions;

(5) purchase options, unless the aggregate premiums paid on all such options held by the Fund at any time do not exceed 20% of its total assets; or sell put options, if, as a result, the aggregate value of the obligations underlying such put options would exceed 50% of its total assets;

(6) purchase warrants if, as a result, such securities, taken at the lower of cost or market value, would represent more than 10% of the value of the Fund’s total assets (for this purpose, warrants acquired in units or attached to securities will be deemed to have no value);

(7) lend portfolio securities in an amount greater than 33 ¹ /3% (the Fund may set a lower percentage with a securities lending agent) of its total assets; and

(8) purchase illiquid securities (including repurchase agreements of more than seven days’ duration, certain restricted securities, and other securities which are not readily marketable), if, as a result, such securities would represent, at the time of purchase, more than 15% of the value of the Fund’s net assets.

For purposes of clause (6) above, participatory notes, as described under “Investment Objectives, Policies and Strategies — Investment Techniques” below, are not deemed to be warrants.

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND STRATEGIES

Investment Objectives

The Japan Fund

The Japan Fund’s investment objective is to achieve long-term capital growth.

Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund

The Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund’s investment objective is to achieve long-term capital growth.

India Fund

The India Fund’s investment objective is to achieve long-term capital growth.

Greater China Fund

The Greater China Fund’s investment objective is to achieve long-term capital growth.

Global Equity Income Fund

The Global Equity Income Fund’s investment objective is to achieve current income and long-term growth of capital through investing in relatively high dividend-paying stocks.

2

Global Emerging Markets Fund

The Global Emerging Markets Fund’s investment objective is to achieve long-term capital growth.

Global Alpha Equity Fund

The Global Alpha Equity Fund’s investment objective is to achieve long-term capital growth.

International Growth Equity Fund

The International Growth Equity Fund’s investment objective is to achieve long-term capital growth.

International Equity Fund

The International Equity Fund’s investment objective is to achieve long-term capital growth.

Each Fund considers its investment objective a fundamental policy and elects to treat it as such pursuant to Sections 8(b)(3) and 13(a)(3) of the 1940 Act. Descriptions of each Fund’s policies, strategies and techniques, as well as additional information regarding the characteristics and risks associated with each Fund’s investment techniques are set forth below.

Investment Policies

The Japan Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its assets in securities of Japanese issuers and other investments that are tied economically to Japan (as defined in the Prospectus).

The Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund will seek to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of companies in the Asia Pacific region, excluding Japan.

The India Fund will seek to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of Indian companies (as defined in the Prospectus) or instruments that have similar economic characteristics.

The Greater China Fund will seek to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of Chinese companies (as defined in the Prospectus) or instruments that have similar economic characteristics.

The Global Equity Income Fund will seek to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its assets in equity securities.

The Global Emerging Markets Fund will seek to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its assets in securities of issuers in emerging markets (i.e., countries that have an emerging market as defined by Standard & Poor’s^® (“S&P^®“), countries or markets with low- to middle-income economies as classified by the World Bank, and other countries or markets with similar emerging characteristics) and other investments that are tied economically to emerging markets.

The Global Alpha Equity Fund will seek to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of U.S. and non-U.S. companies.

The International Growth Equity Fund will seek to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its assets in a portfolio of equity securities of non-U.S. companies.

The International Equity Fund will seek to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of non-U.S. companies, either directly or through other Funds.

The above policies are subject to change only upon 60 days’ notice to shareholders. The term “assets” as used in the above policies, means net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes.

Each Fund may engage in active and frequent trading.

Investment Techniques

The following pages contain more detailed information about types of instruments in which the Funds may invest, strategies the Funds’ investment advisor, Nomura Asset Management U.S.A. Inc (“NAM USA” or the “Advisor”) and the Funds’ investment sub-advisors may employ in pursuit of the Funds’ investment objectives, and a summary of related risks. NAM USA and the sub-advisors may not buy all of these instruments or use all of these techniques unless they believe that doing so will help a Fund achieve its goal.

3

Borrowing. Each Fund may borrow from banks or through reverse repurchase agreements. If a Fund borrows money, its share price may be subject to greater fluctuation until the borrowing is paid off. If a Fund makes additional investments while borrowings are outstanding, this may be considered a form of leverage. Except as otherwise provided in this SAI, each of the Funds may borrow money as permitted by the 1940 Act, including up to 5% of the value of its total assets at the time of such borrowings for temporary purposes and in excess of the 5% limit to meet redemption requests. This borrowing may be unsecured. The 1940 Act requires each of the Funds to maintain continuous asset coverage of 300% of the amount borrowed. If the 300% asset coverage should decline as a result of market fluctuations or other reasons, a Fund may be required to sell some of its portfolio holdings within three days to reduce the debt and restore the 300% asset coverage, even though it may be disadvantageous from an investment standpoint to sell securities at that time. Borrowed funds are subject to interest costs that may or may not be offset by amounts earned on the borrowed funds. A Fund may also be required to maintain minimum average balances in connection with such borrowing or to pay a commitment fee or other fees to maintain a line of credit; either of these requirements would increase the cost of borrowing over the stated interest rate. Each Fund may, in connection with permissible borrowings, transfer as collateral securities owned by the Fund.

Cash Management. Each Fund can hold un-invested cash, including cash collateral from securities lending (if any), or can invest in cash equivalents such as money market securities, repurchase agreements, or shares of money market or short-term bond funds, or units of registered or unregistered collective investment vehicles (which invest in Rule 2a-7 permitted assets). Generally, these securities offer less potential for gains than other types of securities.

Common Stock. Common stock represents an equity or ownership interest in an issuer. In the event an issuer is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the claims of owners of bonds and preferred stock take precedence over the claims of those who own common stock.

Convertible Securities. Each Fund may invest in bonds, debentures, notes, preferred stock or other securities that may be converted or exchanged (by the holder or by the issuer) into shares of the underlying common stock (or cash or securities of equivalent value) at a stated exchange ratio. A convertible security may also be called for redemption or conversion by the issuer after a particular date and under certain circumstances (including a specified price) established upon issue. If a convertible security held by a Fund is called for redemption or conversion, the Fund could be required to tender it for redemption, convert it into the underlying common stock, or sell it to a third party.

Convertible securities generally have less potential for gain or loss than common stocks. Convertible securities generally provide yields higher than the underlying common stocks, but lower than comparable non-convertible securities. Because of this higher yield, convertible securities generally sell at prices above their “conversion value,” which is the current market value of the stock to be received upon conversion. The difference between this conversion value and the price of convertible securities will vary over time depending on changes in the value of the underlying common stocks and interest rates. When the underlying common stocks decline in value, convertible securities will tend not to decline to the same extent because of the interest or dividend payments and the repayment of principal at maturity for certain types of convertible securities. However, securities that are convertible other than at the option of the holder generally do not limit the potential for loss to the same extent as securities convertible at the option of the holder. When the underlying common stocks rise in value, the value of convertible securities may also be expected to increase. At the same time, however, the difference between the market value of convertible securities and their conversion value will narrow, which means that the value of convertible securities will generally not increase to the same extent as the value of the underlying common stocks. Because convertible securities may also be interest-rate sensitive, their value may increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. Convertible securities are also subject to credit risk, and are often lower-quality securities.

Country or Geographic Region. Fund management considers a number of factors to determine whether an investment is tied economically to relevant regions or countries, including: the primary trading market; the issuer’s domicile, sources of revenue, and location of assets; whether the investment is included in an index representative of the region/country; whether the investment is exposed to the economic fortunes and risks of the region/country; and the source of government guarantees (if any).

Debt Securities. Debt securities are used by issuers to borrow money. The issuer usually pays a fixed, variable, or floating rate of interest, and must repay the amount borrowed at the maturity of the security. Some debt securities, such as zero coupon bonds, do not pay interest but are sold at a deep discount from their face values. Debt securities include corporate bonds, government securities, repurchase agreements, and mortgage and other asset-backed securities.

Foreign Currency Transactions. Each of the Funds may conduct foreign currency transactions on a spot (i.e., cash) or forward basis (i.e., by entering into forward contracts to purchase or sell foreign currencies). Although foreign exchange dealers generally do not charge a fee for such conversions, they do realize a profit based on the difference between the prices at which they are buying and selling various currencies. Thus, a dealer may offer to sell a foreign currency at one rate, while offering a lesser rate of exchange should the counterparty desire to resell that currency to the dealer. Forward contracts are customized transactions that require a specific amount of a currency to be delivered at a specific exchange rate on a specific date or range of dates in the future. Forward contracts are generally traded in an interbank market directly between currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers. The parties to a forward contract may agree to offset or terminate the contract before its maturity, or may hold the contract to maturity and complete the contemplated currency exchange.

4

The following discussion summarizes the principal currency management strategies involving forward contracts that could be used by each Fund. The Funds may also use swap agreements, indexed securities, and options and futures contracts relating to foreign currencies for the same purposes.

A “settlement hedge” or “transaction hedge” is designed to protect the Funds against an adverse change in foreign currency values between the date a security is purchased or sold and the date on which payment is made or received. Entering into a forward contract for the purchase or sale of the amount of foreign currency involved in an underlying security transaction for a fixed amount of U.S. Dollars “locks in” the U.S. Dollar price of the security. Forward contracts to purchase or sell a foreign currency may also be used by the Funds in anticipation of future purchases or sales of securities denominated in foreign currency, even if the specific investments have not yet been selected by Fund management.

Each of the Funds may also use forward contracts to hedge against a decline in the value of existing investments denominated in foreign currency. For example, if a Fund owned securities denominated in pounds sterling, it could enter into a forward contract to sell pounds sterling in return for U.S. Dollars to hedge against possible declines in the pound’s value. Such a hedge, sometimes referred to as a “position hedge,” would tend to offset both positive and negative currency fluctuations, but would not offset changes in security values caused by other factors. The Funds could also hedge the position by selling another currency expected to perform similarly to the pound sterling. This type of hedge, sometimes referred to as a “proxy hedge,” could offer advantages in terms of cost, yield, or efficiency, but generally would not hedge currency exposure as effectively as a direct hedge into U.S. Dollars. Proxy hedges may result in losses if the currency used to hedge does not perform similarly to the currency in which the hedged securities are denominated.

Each of the Funds may enter into forward contracts to shift its investment exposure from one currency into another. This may include shifting exposure from U.S. Dollars to a foreign currency, or from one foreign currency to another foreign currency. This type of strategy, sometimes known as a “cross-hedge,” will tend to reduce or eliminate exposure to the currency that is sold, and increase exposure to the currency that is purchased, much as if the Fund had sold a security denominated in one currency and purchased an equivalent security denominated in another. Each of the Funds may cross-hedge its U.S. dollar exposure in order to achieve a representative weighted mix of the major currencies in its benchmark index and/or to cover an underweight country or region exposure in its portfolio. Cross-hedges protect against losses resulting from a decline in the hedged currency, but will cause the Fund to assume the risk of fluctuations in the value of the currency it purchases.

Each Fund’s sub-advisor will determine what currency transactions the Fund should engage in. Successful use of currency management strategies will depend on the sub-advisor’s skill in analyzing currency values. Currency management strategies may substantially change the Funds’ investment exposure to changes in currency exchange rates and could result in losses to the Funds if currencies do not perform as the sub-advisor anticipates. For example, if a currency’s value rose at a time when a sub-advisor had hedged a Fund by selling that currency in exchange for dollars, the Fund would not participate in the currency’s appreciation. If a sub-advisor hedges currency exposure through proxy hedges, a Fund could realize currency losses from both the hedge and the security position if the two currencies do not move in tandem. Similarly, if a sub-advisor increases a Fund’s exposure to a foreign currency and that currency’s value declines, the Fund will realize a loss. Each of the Funds may be required to limit its hedging transactions in foreign currency forwards, futures, and options in order to maintain its classification as a “regulated investment company” under the Code. Hedging transactions could result in the application of the mark-to-market provisions of the Code, which may cause an increase (or decrease) in the amount of taxable dividends paid by a Fund and could affect whether dividends paid by the Fund are classified as capital gains or ordinary income. There is no assurance that a sub-advisor’s use of currency management strategies will be advantageous to a Fund or that it will employ currency management strategies at appropriate times.

Options and Futures Relating to Foreign Currencies. Currency futures contracts are similar to forward currency exchange contracts, except that they are traded on exchanges (and have margin requirements) and are standardized as to contract size and delivery date. Most currency futures contracts call for payment or delivery in U.S. dollars. The underlying instrument of a currency option may be a foreign currency, which generally is purchased or delivered in exchange for U.S. dollars, or may be a futures contract. The purchaser of a currency call obtains the right to purchase the underlying instrument, and the purchaser of a currency put obtains the right to sell the underlying instrument.

The uses and risks of currency options and futures are similar to options and futures relating to securities or indices, as discussed below. Each of the Funds may purchase and sell currency futures and may purchase and write currency options to increase or decrease its exposure to different foreign currencies. Currency options may also be purchased or written in conjunction with each other or with currency futures or forward contracts. Currency futures and options values can be expected to correlate with exchange rates, but may not reflect other factors that affect the value of a Fund’s investments. A currency hedge, for example, should protect a Yen-denominated security from a decline in the Yen, but will not protect a Fund against a price decline resulting from deterioration in the issuer’s creditworthiness. Because the value of a Fund’s foreign-denominated investments changes in response to many factors other than exchange rates, it may not be possible to match the amount of currency options and futures to the value of the Fund’s investments exactly over time.

5

Foreign Repurchase Agreements. Foreign repurchase agreements involve an agreement to purchase a foreign security and to sell that security back to the original seller at an agreed-upon price in either U.S. Dollars or foreign currency. Unlike typical U.S. repurchase agreements, foreign repurchase agreements may not be fully collateralized at all times. The value of a security purchased by a Fund may be more or less than the price at which the counterparty has agreed to repurchase the security. In the event of default by the counterparty, a Fund may suffer a loss if the value of the security purchased is less than the agreed-upon repurchase price, or if the Fund is unable to successfully assert a claim to the collateral under foreign laws. As a result, foreign repurchase agreements may involve higher credit risks than repurchase agreements in U.S. markets, as well as risks associated with currency fluctuations. In addition, as with other emerging market investments, repurchase agreements with counterparties located in emerging markets or relating to emerging markets may involve issuers or counterparties with lower credit ratings than typical U.S. repurchase agreements.

Futures, Options and Swaps. The success of any strategy involving futures, options and swaps depends on the applicable sub-advisor’s analysis of many economic and mathematical factors and a Fund’s return may be higher if it never invests in such instruments. Additionally, some of the contracts discussed below are new instruments without a trading history and there can be no assurance that a market for the instruments will continue to exist.

Futures Contracts. In purchasing a futures contract, the buyer agrees to purchase a specified underlying instrument at a specified future date. In selling a futures contract, the seller agrees to sell a specified underlying instrument at a specified future date. The price at which the purchase and sale will take place is fixed when the buyer and seller enter into the contract. Some currently available futures contracts are based on specific securities and some are based on indices of securities prices. Futures can be held until their delivery dates, or can be closed out before then if a liquid secondary market is available.

The value of a futures contract tends to increase and decrease in tandem with the value of its underlying instrument. Therefore, purchasing futures contracts will tend to increase a Fund’s exposure to positive and negative price fluctuations in the underlying instrument, much as if it had purchased the underlying instrument directly. When a Fund sells a futures contract, by contrast, the value of its futures position will tend to move in a direction contrary to the market. Selling futures contracts, therefore, will tend to offset both positive and negative market price changes, much as if the underlying instrument had been sold.

The purchaser or seller of a futures contract or an option for a futures contract is not required to deliver or pay for the underlying instrument unless the contract is held until the delivery date. However, both the purchaser and seller are required to deposit “initial margin” with a futures broker, known as a futures commission merchant, when the contract is entered into. If the value of either party’s position declines, that party will be required to make additional “variation margin” payments to settle the change in value on a daily basis. This process of “marking to market” will be reflected in the daily calculation of open positions computed in each Fund’s net asset value per share (“NAV”). The party that has a gain is entitled to receive all or a portion of this amount. Initial and variation margin payments do not constitute purchasing securities on margin for purposes of a Fund’s investment limitations. In the event of the bankruptcy of a futures commission merchant that holds margin on behalf of a Fund, the Fund may be entitled to return of margin owed to it only in proportion to the amount received by the future commission merchant’s other customers, potentially resulting in losses to the Fund.

Although futures exchanges generally operate similarly in the United States and abroad, foreign futures exchanges may follow trading, settlement, and margin procedures that are different from those for U.S. exchanges. Futures contracts traded outside the United States may involve greater risk of loss than U.S.-traded contracts, including potentially greater risk of losses due to insolvency of a futures broker, exchange member, or other party that may owe initial or variation margin to the Fund. Because initial and variation margin payments may be measured in foreign currency, a futures contract traded outside the United States may also involve the risk of foreign currency fluctuation.

Limitations on Futures and Options Transactions. The Corporation has filed with the National Futures Association a notice claiming an exclusion from the definition of the term “commodity pool operator” (“CPO”) under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and the rules of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission promulgated thereunder, with respect to the Funds’ operation. Accordingly, none of the Funds are subject to registration or regulation as a CPO.

There is no assurance that a liquid market will exist for any particular futures contract at any particular time. Exchanges may establish daily price fluctuation limits for futures contracts, and may halt trading if a contract’s price moves upward or downward more than the limit in a given day. On volatile trading days when the price fluctuation limit is reached or a trading halt is imposed, it may be impossible to enter into new positions or close out existing positions. If the market for a contract is not liquid because of price fluctuation limits or other market conditions, it could prevent prompt liquidation of unfavorable positions, and potentially could require a Fund to continue to hold a position until delivery or expiration regardless of changes in its value. As a result, a Fund’s access to other assets held to cover its futures positions could also be impaired.

6

Because there are a limited number of types of exchange-traded futures contracts, it is likely that the standardized contracts available will not match the Funds’ current or anticipated investments exactly. Each of the Funds may invest in futures contracts based on securities with different issuers, maturities, or other characteristics from the securities in which the Fund typically invests, which involves a risk that the futures position will not track the performance of the Fund’s other investments.

Futures prices can also diverge from the prices of their underlying instruments, even if the underlying instruments match the Fund’s investments well. Futures prices are affected by such factors as current and anticipated short-term interest rates, changes in volatility of the underlying instrument, and the time remaining until expiration of the contract, which may not affect security prices the same way. Imperfect correlation may also result from differing levels of demand in the futures markets and the securities markets, from structural differences in how futures and securities are traded, or from imposition of daily price fluctuation limits or trading halts. Each Fund may purchase or sell futures contracts with a greater or lesser value than the securities it wishes to hedge or intends to purchase in order to attempt to compensate for differences in volatility between the contract and the securities, although this may not be successful in all cases. If price changes in a Fund’s futures positions are poorly correlated with its other investments, the positions may fail to produce anticipated gains or result in losses that are not offset by gains in other investments.

Options. By purchasing a put option, the purchaser obtains the right (but not the obligation) to sell the option’s underlying instrument at a fixed strike price. In return for this right, the purchaser pays the current market price for the option (known as the option premium). Options have various types of underlying instruments, including specific securities, indices of securities prices, and futures contracts. The purchaser may terminate its position in a put option by allowing it to expire or by exercising the option. If the option is allowed to expire, the purchaser will lose the entire premium. If the option is exercised, the purchaser completes the sale of the underlying instrument at the strike price. A purchaser may also terminate a put option position by closing it out in the secondary market at its current price, if a liquid secondary market exists.

The buyer of a typical put option can expect to realize a gain if security prices fall substantially. However, if the underlying instrument’s price does not fall enough to offset the cost of purchasing the option, a put buyer can expect to suffer a loss (limited to the amount of the premium, plus related transaction costs).

The features of call options are essentially the same as those of put options, except that the purchaser of a call option obtains the right to purchase, rather than sell, the underlying instrument at the option’s strike price. A call buyer typically attempts to participate in potential price increases of the underlying instrument with risk limited to the cost of the option if security prices fall. At the same time, the buyer can expect to suffer a loss if security prices do not rise sufficiently to offset the cost of the option.

The writer of a put or call option takes the opposite side of the transaction from the option’s purchaser. In return for receipt of the premium, the writer assumes the obligation to pay or receive the strike price for the option’s underlying instrument if the other party to the option chooses to exercise it. The writer may seek to terminate a position in a put option before exercise by closing out the option in the secondary market at its current price. If the secondary market is not liquid for a put option, however, the writer must continue to be prepared to pay the strike price while the option is outstanding, regardless of price changes. When writing an option on a futures contract, a Fund will be required to make margin payments to a futures commission merchant as described above for futures contracts.

If security prices rise, a put writer would generally expect to profit, although its gain would be limited to the amount of the premium it received. If security prices remain the same over time, it is likely that the writer will also profit, because it should be able to close out the option at a lower price. If security prices fall, the put writer would expect to suffer a loss. This loss should be less than the loss from purchasing the underlying instrument directly, however, because the premium received for writing the option should mitigate the effects of the decline.

Writing a call option obligates the writer to sell or deliver the option’s underlying instrument, in return for the strike price, upon exercise of the option. The characteristics of writing call options are similar to those of writing put options, except that writing calls generally is a profitable strategy if prices remain the same or fall. Through receipt of the option premium, a call writer mitigates the effects of a price decline. At the same time, because a call writer must be prepared to deliver the underlying instrument in return for the strike price, even if its current value is greater, a call writer gives up some ability to participate in security price increases.

There is no assurance that a liquid market will exist for any particular options contract at any particular time. Options may have relatively low trading volume and liquidity if their strike prices are not close to the underlying instrument’s current price. In addition, exchanges may establish daily price fluctuation limits for options contracts, and may halt trading if a contract’s price moves upward or downward more than the limit in a given day. On volatile trading days when the price fluctuation limit is reached or a trading halt is imposed, it may be impossible to enter into new positions or close out existing positions. If the market for a contract is not liquid because of price fluctuation limits or otherwise, it could prevent prompt liquidation of unfavorable positions, and potentially could require a Fund to continue to hold a position until delivery or expiration regardless of changes in its value. As a result, a Fund’s access to other assets held to cover its options positions could also be impaired.

7

Unlike exchange-traded options, which are standardized with respect to the underlying instrument, expiration date, contract size, and strike price, the terms of over-the-counter options (options not traded on exchanges, known as “OTC options”) generally are established through negotiation with the other party to the option contract. While this type of arrangement allows the purchaser or writer greater flexibility to tailor an option to its needs, OTC options generally are less liquid and involve greater credit risk than exchange-traded options, which are backed by the clearing organization of the exchanges where they are traded.

Combined positions involve purchasing and writing options in combination with each other, or in combination with futures or forward contracts, to adjust the risk and return characteristics of the overall position. For example, purchasing a put option and writing a call option on the same underlying instrument would construct a combined position whose risk and return characteristics are similar to selling a futures contract. Another possible combined position would involve writing a call option at one strike price and buying a call option at a lower price, to reduce the risk of the written call option in the event of a substantial price increase. Because combined options positions involve multiple trades, they result in higher transaction costs and may be more difficult to open and close out.

Because there are a limited number of types of exchange-traded options contracts, it is likely that the standardized contracts available will not match the Funds’ current or anticipated investments exactly. Each of the Funds may invest in options contracts based on securities with different issuers, maturities, or other characteristics from the securities in which the Fund typically invests, which involves a risk that the options position will not track the performance of the Fund’s other investments.

Options prices can also diverge from the prices of their underlying instruments, even if the underlying instruments match the Fund’s investments well. Options prices are affected by such factors as current and anticipated short-term interest rates, changes in volatility of the underlying instrument, and the time remaining until expiration of the contract, which may not affect security prices the same way. Imperfect correlation may also result from differing levels of demand in the options and futures markets and the securities markets, from structural differences in how options and futures and securities are traded, or from imposition of daily price fluctuation limits or trading halts. Each of the Funds may purchase or sell options contracts with a greater or lesser value than the securities it wishes to hedge or intends to purchase in order to attempt to compensate for differences in volatility between the contract and the securities, although this may not be successful in all cases. If price changes in a Fund’s options positions are poorly correlated with its other investments, the positions may fail to produce anticipated gains or result in losses that are not offset by gains in other investments.

Illiquid Securities. Illiquid securities are securities that cannot be sold or disposed of within seven days in the ordinary course of business at approximately the prices at which they are valued. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or may be costly to a Fund. Under the supervision of the Board (the “Board”), the applicable sub-advisor determines the liquidity of each Fund’s investments and, through reports from the sub-advisors, the Board monitors investments in illiquid securities. In determining the liquidity of a Fund’s investments, various factors may be considered, including (1) the frequency and volume of trades and quotations, (2) the number of dealers and prospective purchasers in the marketplace, (3) dealer undertakings to make a market, and (4) the nature of the security and the market in which it trades (including any demand, put or tender features, the mechanics and other requirements for transfer, any letters of credit or other credit enhancement features, any ratings, the number of holders, the method of soliciting offers, the time required to dispose of the security, and the ability to assign or offset the rights and obligations of the security).

Indexed Securities. Indexed securities are instruments whose prices are indexed to the prices of other securities, securities indices, currencies, or other financial indicators. Indexed securities typically, but not always, are debt securities or deposits whose value at maturity or coupon rate is determined by reference to a specific instrument or statistic.

Currency-indexed securities typically are short-term to intermediate-term debt securities whose maturity values or interest rates are determined by reference to the values of one or more specified foreign currencies, and may offer higher yields than U.S. Dollar-denominated securities. Currency-indexed securities may be positively or negatively indexed; that is, their maturity value may increase when the specified currency value increases, resulting in a security that performs similarly to a foreign-denominated instrument, or their maturity value may decline when foreign currencies increase, resulting in a security whose price characteristics are similar to a put on the underlying currency. Currency-indexed securities may also have prices that depend on the values of a number of different foreign currencies relative to each other.

The performance of indexed securities depends to a great extent on the performance of the security, currency, or other instrument to which they are indexed, and may also be influenced by interest rate changes in the United States and abroad. Indexed securities may be more volatile than the underlying instruments. Indexed securities are also subject to the credit risks associated with the issuer of the security, and their values may decline substantially if the issuer’s creditworthiness deteriorates. Recent issuers of indexed securities have included banks, corporations, and certain U.S. Government agencies.

Initial Public Offerings (“IPOs”). The Funds may purchase securities through initial public offerings. These securities are subject to many of the same risks as investing in companies with smaller market capitalizations. Securities issued in IPOs have no trading history, and information about the companies may be available for very limited periods. The prices of securities sold in IPOs may be highly volatile. At any particular time or from time to time, a Fund may not be able to invest in securities issued in IPOs, or invest to

8

the extent desired, because, for example, only a small portion (if any) of the securities being offered in an IPO may be made available to the Fund. In addition, under certain market conditions, a relatively small number of companies may issue securities in IPOs. Similarly, as the number of Funds to which IPO securities are allocated increases, the number of securities issued to any one Fund may decrease. The investment performance of a Fund during periods when it is unable to invest significantly or at all in IPOs may be lower than during periods when the Fund is able to do so. In addition, as a Fund increases in size, the impact of IPOs on the Fund’s performance will generally decrease.

Investment-Grade Debt Securities. Investment-grade debt securities include all types of debt instruments that are of medium and high quality. Investment-grade debt securities include repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Government securities, as well as repurchase agreements collateralized by equity securities, non-investment-grade debt, and all other instruments in which a Fund can perfect a security interest, provided the repurchase agreement counterparty has an investment-grade rating. See “Repurchase Agreements.” Some investment-grade debt securities may possess speculative characteristics and may be more sensitive to economic changes and to changes in the financial conditions of issuers. An investment-grade rating means the security or issuer is rated investment-grade by a credit rating agency registered as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (for example, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.), or is unrated but considered to be of equivalent quality by the applicable sub-advisor.

Loans and Other Direct Debt Instruments. Direct debt instruments are interests in amounts owed by a corporate, governmental, or other borrower to lenders or lending syndicates (loans and loan participations), to suppliers of goods or services (trade claims or other receivables), or to other parties. Direct debt instruments involve a risk of loss in case of default or insolvency of the borrower and may offer less legal protection to the purchaser in the event of fraud or misrepresentation, or there may be a requirement that a Fund supply additional cash to a borrower on demand.

Purchasers of loans and other forms of direct indebtedness depend primarily upon the creditworthiness of the borrower for payment of interest and repayment of principal. If scheduled interest or principal payments are not made, the value of the instrument may be adversely affected. Loans that are fully secured provide more protections than an unsecured loan in the event of failure to make scheduled interest or principal payments. However, there is no assurance that the liquidation of collateral from a secured loan would satisfy the borrower’s obligation, or that the collateral could be liquidated. Indebtedness of borrowers whose creditworthiness is poor involves substantially greater risks and may be highly speculative. Borrowers that are in bankruptcy or restructuring may never pay off their indebtedness, or may pay only a small fraction of the amount owed. Direct indebtedness of developing countries also involves a risk that the governmental entities responsible for the repayment of the debt may be unable, or unwilling, to pay interest and repay principal when due.

Investments in loans through direct assignment of a financial institution’s interests with respect to a loan may involve additional risks. For example, if a loan is foreclosed, the purchaser could become part owner of any collateral, and would bear the costs and liabilities associated with owning and disposing of the collateral. In addition, it is conceivable that under emerging legal theories of lender liability, a purchaser could be held liable as a co-lender. Direct debt instruments may also involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or other intermediary.

A loan is often administered by a bank or other financial institution that acts as agent for all holders. The agent administers the terms of the loan, as specified in the loan agreement. Unless, under the terms of the loan or other indebtedness, the purchaser has direct recourse against the borrower, the purchaser may have to rely on the agent to apply appropriate credit remedies against a borrower. If assets held by the agent for the benefit of a purchaser were determined to be subject to the claims of the agent’s general creditors, the purchaser might incur certain costs and delays in realizing payment on the loan or loan participation and could suffer a loss of principal or interest.

Direct indebtedness may include letters of credit, revolving credit facilities, or other standby financing commitments that obligate purchasers to make additional cash payments on demand. These commitments may have the effect of requiring a purchaser to increase its investment in a borrower at a time when it would not otherwise have done so, even if the borrower’s condition makes it unlikely that the amount will ever be repaid.

Each of the Funds limits the amount of total assets that it will invest in any one issuer or in issuers within the same industry. For purposes of these limitations, each Fund generally will treat the borrower as the “issuer” of indebtedness held by the Fund. In the case of loan participations where a bank or other lending institution serves as financial intermediary between a Fund and the borrower, if the participation does not shift to the Fund the direct debtor-creditor relationship with the borrower, SEC interpretations require each Fund, in appropriate circumstances, to treat both the lending bank or other lending institution and the borrower as “issuers” for these purposes. Treating a financial intermediary as an issuer of indebtedness may restrict the Funds’ ability to invest in indebtedness related to a single financial intermediary, or a group of intermediaries engaged in the same industry, even if the underlying borrowers represent many different companies and industries.

9

Lower-Quality Debt Securities. Lower-quality debt securities include all types of debt instruments that have poor protection with respect to the payment of interest and repayment of principal, or may be in default. These securities are often considered to be speculative and involve greater risk of loss or price changes due to changes in the issuer’s capacity to pay. The market prices of lower-quality debt securities may fluctuate more than those of higher-quality debt securities and may decline significantly in periods of general economic difficulty, which may follow periods of rising interest rates.

The market for lower-quality debt securities may be thinner and less active than that for higher-quality debt securities, which can adversely affect the prices at which the former are sold. Adverse publicity and changing investor perceptions may affect the liquidity of lower-quality debt securities and the ability of outside pricing services to value lower-quality debt securities.

Because the risk of default is higher for lower-quality debt securities, the sub-advisors’ research and credit analysis are an especially important part of managing securities of this type. The sub-advisors will attempt to identify those issuers of high-yielding securities whose financial condition is adequate to meet future obligations, has improved, or is expected to improve in the future. The sub-advisors’ analysis focuses on relative values based on such factors as interest or dividend coverage, asset coverage, earnings prospects, and the experience and managerial strength of the issuer.

Each Fund may choose, at its expense or in conjunction with others, to pursue litigation or otherwise to exercise its rights as a security holder if it determines this to be in the best interest of such Fund’s shareholders.

Participatory Notes. Each Fund may invest in participatory notes. Participatory notes, which may be issued in various structures and may be designated by different terms, including, but not limited to, P-Notes and warrants, are instruments that derive their value from an underlying or referenced financial instrument, such as an equity share. Generally, non-U.S.-based brokerages buy locally-based securities and then issue participatory notes to investors. Participatory notes are subject to both investment risk relating to the underlying or referenced financial instrument and credit risk based on the uncertainty of the counterparty’s (i.e., the non-U.S.-based brokerage’s) ability to meet its obligations.

Preferred Securities. Preferred securities represent an equity or ownership interest in an issuer that is entitled to dividends at a specified rate and that has precedence over common stock in the payment of dividends. In the event an issuer is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the claims of owners of bonds take precedence over the claims of those who own preferred securities and common stock.

Real Estate Investment Trusts. Each Fund is permitted to invest in real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). If a Fund invests in a REIT, such Fund will be subject to the risks associated with owning real estate and with the real estate industry generally. These risks include difficulties in valuing and disposing of real estate, the possibility of declines in the value of real estate, risks related to general and local economic conditions, the possibility of adverse changes in real estate markets, environmental liability risks, the risk of increases in property taxes and operating expenses, possible adverse changes in zoning laws, the risk of casualty or condemnation losses, limitations on rents, and the possibility of adverse changes in interest rates. To the extent a Fund invests in REITs, it will also be subject to the risk that a REIT will default on its obligations or go bankrupt. By investing in REITs indirectly through a Fund, a shareholder will bear not only his or her proportionate share of the expenses of the Fund, but also, indirectly, similar expenses of the REITs.

Repurchase Agreements. Repurchase agreements involve an agreement to purchase a security and to sell that security back to the original seller at an agreed-upon price. The resale price reflects the purchase price plus an agreed-upon incremental amount which is unrelated to the coupon rate or maturity of the purchased security. As protection against the risk that the original seller will not fulfill its obligation, the securities are held in a separate account at a bank, marked-to-market daily, and maintained at a value at least equal to the sale price plus the accrued incremental amount. The value of the security purchased may be more or less than the price at which the counterparty has agreed to purchase the security. In addition, delays or losses could result if the other party to the agreement defaults or becomes insolvent. The Funds will engage in repurchase agreement transactions only with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by the applicable sub-advisor.

Restricted Securities. Restricted securities are subject to legal restrictions on their sale. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or be costly to the Funds. Restricted securities generally can be sold in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), or in a registered public offering. Where registration is required, the holder of a registered security may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expense and a considerable period may elapse between the time it decides to seek registration and the time it may be permitted to sell a security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, the holder might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to seek registration of the security.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements. In a reverse repurchase agreement, a Fund sells a security to another party, such as a bank or broker-dealer, in return for cash and agrees to repurchase that security at an agreed-upon price and time. A Fund will only enter into reverse repurchase agreements with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by such Fund’s sub-advisor. Such transactions may increase fluctuations in the market value of Fund assets and may be viewed as a form of leverage.

10

Securities Lending. Subject to investment limitation (7) above under “Investment Restrictions,” each Fund may lend securities from its portfolio to parties such as broker-dealers or other institutions. Securities lending allows the Funds to retain ownership of the securities loaned and, at the same time, earn additional income. Generally, the purpose of such loans is to permit the borrowers to use such securities for delivery to purchasers when such borrowers have sold short. The borrower provides a Fund with collateral in an amount at least equal to the value of the securities loaned. The cash collateral received by such Fund is invested in cash or cash equivalents. Each Fund retains the right to vote or consent on proxy proposals involving material events affecting securities loaned. Loans of securities are terminable at any time and the borrower, after notice, is required to return borrowed securities within the standard time period for settlement of securities transactions. Each Fund is obligated to return the collateral to the borrower at the termination of the loan. Each Fund will have the right to regain record ownership of loaned securities to exercise beneficial rights such as voting rights, subscription rights and rights to dividends, interest or other distributions. The Funds may pay reasonable finder’s, administrative and custodial fees in connection with such loans. With respect to the lending of portfolio securities, there is the risk of failure by the borrower to return the securities involved in such transactions. In the event that the borrower defaults on its obligation to return borrowed securities because of insolvency or other reasons, the Fund could experience delays and costs in recovering the securities loaned or in gaining access to the collateral. These delays and costs could be greater for foreign securities. If a Fund is not able to recover the securities loaned, the Fund may sell the collateral and purchase a replacement investment in the market. The value of the collateral could decrease below the value of the replacement investment by the time the replacement investment is purchased. These events could trigger adverse tax consequences to the Fund.

Securities of Other Investment Companies. Securities of other investment companies, including shares of closed-end investment companies, unit investment trusts, and open-end investment companies, represent interests in professionally managed portfolios that may invest in any type of instrument. Investing in other investment companies involves substantially the same risks as investing directly in the underlying instruments, but may involve additional expenses at the investment company level, such as portfolio management fees and operating expenses. Certain types of investment companies, such as closed-end investment companies, issue a fixed number of shares that trade on a stock exchange or over-the-counter at a premium or a discount to their NAV. Others are continuously offered at NAV, but may also be traded in the secondary market.

The extent to which a Fund can invest in securities of other investment companies is limited by federal securities laws.

Short Sales “Against the Box.” Short sales “against the box” are short sales of securities that a Fund owns or has the right to obtain (equivalent in kind or amount to the securities sold short). If a Fund enters into a short sale against the box, it will be required to set aside securities equivalent in kind and amount to the securities sold short (or securities convertible or exchangeable into such securities) and will be required to hold such securities while the short sale is outstanding. A Fund will incur transaction costs, including interest expenses, in connection with opening, maintaining, and closing short sales against the box.

Sovereign Debt Obligations. Sovereign debt obligations are issued or guaranteed by foreign governments or their agencies. Sovereign debt may be in the form of conventional securities or other types of debt instruments such as loans or loan participations. Sovereign debt of developing countries may involve a high degree of risk, and may be in default or present the risk of default. Governmental entities responsible for repayment of the debt may be unable or unwilling to repay principal and pay interest when due, and may require renegotiation or rescheduling of debt payments. In addition, prospects for repayment of principal and payment of interest may depend on political as well as economic factors. Although some sovereign debt, such as Brady Bonds, is collateralized by U.S. Government securities, repayment of principal and payment of interest is not guaranteed by the U.S. Government.

Swap Agreements. Swaps are individually negotiated and structured to include exposure to a variety of different types of investments or market factors. Swap agreements are two-party contracts entered into primarily by institutional investors. Swap agreements can vary in term like other fixed-income investments. Most swap agreements are traded over-the-counter. In a standard “swap” transaction, two parties agree to exchange the returns (or differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on particular predetermined investments or instruments. The gross returns to be exchanged or swapped between the parties are calculated with respect to a notional amount, which is the predetermined dollar principal of the trade representing the hypothetical underlying quantity upon which payment obligations are computed.

Swap agreements can take many different forms and are known by a variety of names. Depending on how they are used, swap agreements may increase or decrease the overall volatility of a Fund’s investments and its share price and yield.

In a credit default swap, the credit default protection buyer makes periodic payments, known as premiums, to the credit default protection seller. In return, the credit default protection seller will make a payment to the credit default protection buyer upon the occurrence of a specified credit event. A credit default swap can refer to a single issuer or asset, a basket of issuers or assets or index of assets, each known as the reference entity or underlying asset. Each Fund may act as either the buyer or the seller of a credit default swap. A Fund may buy or sell credit default protection on a basket of issuers or assets, even if a number of the underlying assets referenced in the basket are lower-quality debt securities. In an unhedged credit default swap, the Fund buys credit default protection on a single issuer or asset, a basket of issuers or assets or index of assets without owning the underlying asset or debt issued by the reference entity. Credit default swaps involve greater and different risks than investing directly in the referenced asset, because, in addition to market risk, credit default swaps include liquidity, counterparty and operational risk.

11

Credit default swaps allow a Fund to acquire or reduce credit exposure to a particular issuer, asset or basket of assets. If a swap agreement calls for payments by a Fund, the Fund must be prepared to make such payments when due. If a Fund is the credit default protection seller, the Fund will experience a loss if a credit event occurs and the credit of the reference entity or underlying asset has deteriorated. If a Fund is the credit default protection buyer, the Fund will be required to pay premiums to the credit default protection seller.

If the creditworthiness of a Fund’s swap counterparty declines, the risk that the counterparty may not perform could increase, potentially resulting in a loss to the Fund. To limit the counterparty risk involved in swap agreements, the Funds will only enter into swap agreements with counterparties that meet certain standards of creditworthiness.

Swap agreements generally are entered into by “eligible participants” and in compliance with certain other criteria necessary to render them excluded from regulation under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) and, therefore, not subject to regulation as futures or commodity option transactions under the CEA.

Temporary Defensive Policies. Each of the Funds reserves the right to invest without limitation in preferred stocks and investment-grade debt instruments for temporary, defensive purposes.

Warrants and Rights. Warrants are instruments which entitle the holder to buy an equity security at a specific price for a specific period of time. Changes in the value of a warrant do not necessarily correspond to changes in the value of its underlying security. Rights are similar to warrants but normally have a short duration and are distributed directly by the issuer to its shareholders. Warrants and rights are highly volatile and, therefore, more susceptible to sharp declines in value than the underlying security might be.

Warrants and rights do not entitle a holder to dividends or voting rights with respect to the underlying security and do not represent any rights in the assets of the issuing company. A warrant or right ceases to have value if it is not exercised prior to its expiration date. These factors can make warrants more speculative than other types of investments. They are also generally less liquid than an investment in the underlying securities.

Zero Coupon Bonds. Zero coupon bonds do not make interest payments; instead, they are sold at a discount from their face value and are redeemed at face value when they mature. Because zero coupon bonds do not pay current income, their prices can be more volatile than other types of fixed-income securities when interest rates change. In calculating a Fund’s dividend, a portion of the difference between a zero coupon bond’s purchase price and its face value is considered income.

Master/Feeder Structure. The Board has the discretion to retain the current distribution arrangement for each of the Funds while investing in a master/feeder fund structure, as described below.

A master/feeder fund structure is one in which a fund (a “feeder fund”), instead of investing directly in a portfolio of securities, invests most or all of its investment assets in a separate registered investment company (the “master fund”) with substantially the same investment objective and policies as the feeder fund. Such a structure permits the pooling of assets of two or more feeder funds, preserving separate identities or distribution channels at the feeder fund level. Based on the premise that certain of the expenses of operating an investment portfolio are relatively fixed, a larger investment portfolio may eventually achieve a lower ratio of operating expenses to average daily net assets. An existing investment company is able to convert to a feeder fund by selling all of its investments, which involves brokerage and other transaction costs and realization of a taxable gain or loss, or by contributing its assets to the master fund and avoiding transaction costs and, if proper procedures are followed, avoiding the realization of taxable gain or loss.

Fund of Funds Structure. Each of the Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund and the International Equity Fund are permitted to invest in certain other Funds within the Corporation. These two Funds are permitted to invest in one another, to the extent permitted by applicable law.

Additional Information about Investment Strategies. The sub-advisors may use Standard Industrial Classification (“SIC”) Codes or any other reasonable industry classification system (including systems developed by the sub-advisors) for purposes of the Funds’ investment restrictions and policies relating to industry concentration, and the approaches used by the various sub-advisors may differ from one another.

In addition each sub-advisor may use definitions and standards to determine compliance with the investment policies, strategies and restrictions of the Funds it advises that are specific to that sub-advisor. For example, a sub-advisor may employ its own internally-developed definitions and standards in connection with characterizing a security as an “equity” or “debt” security, characterizing a security as a “growth” or “value” security, determining the composition of an “industry,” determining the scope of a “geographic region,” characterizing an investment as “income-producing” and characterizing an investment as a U.S. or non-U.S. investment. In addition, the definitions and standards used by a sub-advisor may change over time and without notice to investors, and in certain cases a sub-advisor may use definitions for a Fund which differ from the definitions and standards it uses for other series of the Corporation or for other funds and accounts which it advises.

12

Chinese Securities. The Funds may hold securities listed on the Shanghai or Shenzhen stock exchanges. Securities listed on these exchanges are divided into two classes: A shares, which are mostly limited to domestic investors, and B shares, which are allocated for both international and domestic investors. In addition to B shares, the Funds may also invest in Hong Kong listed H shares, Hong Kong listed Red Chips (which are companies owned by mainland China enterprises, but are listed in Hong Kong), and companies with a significant amount of their revenues derived from business conducted in China (regardless of the exchange on which the security is listed or the country in which the company is based).

RISKS OF INVESTMENT

Risks Associated with Emerging Markets. The risks of investment in developing or emerging economies and markets arise from (i) the lack of social, political, and economic stability; (ii) the smaller size of the securities markets and the lower volume of trading, which may result in a lack of liquidity and in greater price volatility; (iii) certain national policies that may restrict the Funds’ investment opportunities, including restrictions on investment in issuers or industries deemed sensitive to national interests, or expropriation or confiscation of assets or property, which could result in the Funds’ loss of their entire investment in that market; (iv) less developed legal and regulatory structures governing private or foreign investment or allowing for judicial redress for injury to private property; (v) inaccurate, incomplete or misleading financial information on companies in which the Funds invest; (vi) securities of companies trading at prices that may not be consistent with traditional valuation measures; and (vii) limitations on foreign ownership, which may impact the price of a security purchased or held by the Funds.

Many developing countries in which the Funds invest lack the social, political and economic stability characteristics of the United States. Political instability among emerging markets countries can be common and may be caused by an uneven distribution of wealth, social unrest, labor strikes, civil wars and religious oppression. Economic instability in emerging markets countries may take the form of (i) high interest rates, (ii) high levels of inflation, including hyperinflation, (iii) high levels of unemployment or underemployment, (iv) changes in government economic and tax policies, including confiscatory taxation, and (v) imposition of trade barriers.

Stock exchanges in emerging markets have in the past experienced substantial fluctuations in the prices of their listed securities. They have also experienced problems such as temporary exchange closures, broker defaults, settlement delays and broker strikes that, if they occur again in the future, could affect the market price and liquidity of the securities in which the Funds invest. In addition, the governing bodies of certain stock exchanges have from time to time imposed restrictions on trading in certain securities, limitations on price movements and margin requirements. Disputes have also occurred from time to time among listed companies, the stock exchanges and other regulatory bodies, and in some cases those disputes have had a negative effect on overall market sentiment. There have been delays and errors in share allotments relating to initial public offerings, which in turn affect overall market sentiment and lead to fluctuations in the market prices of the securities of those companies and others in which the Funds may invest.

In the past, governments within the emerging markets have become overly reliant on the international capital markets and other forms of foreign credit to finance public spending programs that cause large deficits. Often, interest payments have become too burdensome for the government to meet, representing a large percentage of total gross domestic product (“GDP”). These foreign obligations then become the subject of political debate with the opposition parties pressuring the government to use its funds for social programs rather than making payments to foreign creditors. Either due to an inability to pay or submission to political pressure, foreign governments have been forced to seek a restructuring of their loan and/or bond obligations or have declared a temporary suspension of interest payments or have defaulted. These events have adversely affected the values of securities issued by foreign governments and companies in emerging markets countries and have negatively impacted not only their cost of borrowing, but their ability to borrow in the future as well.

In addition, brokerage commissions, custodian services, withholding taxes, and other costs relating to investment in foreign markets may be more expensive than in the United States. The operating expense ratio of the Fund may be expected to be higher than that of a fund investing primarily in the securities of U.S. issuers.

Many emerging markets countries suffer from uncertainty and corruption in their legal frameworks. Legislation may be difficult to interpret and laws may be too new to provide any precedential value. Laws regarding foreign investment and private property may be weak or non-existent. Sudden changes in governments may result in policies that are less favorable to investors, such as policies designed to expropriate or nationalize “sovereign” assets. Certain emerging markets countries in the past have expropriated large amounts of private property, in many cases with little or no compensation, and there can be no assurance that such expropriation will not occur in the future.

Legal principles relating to corporate affairs and the validity of corporate procedures, directors’ fiduciary duties and liabilities and shareholders’ rights may differ from those that may apply in the United States and other more developed countries. Shareholders’ rights may not be as extensive as those that exist under the laws of the United States and other more developed countries. The Funds may therefore have more difficulty asserting shareholder rights than they would as a shareholder of a comparable U.S. company.

13

Disclosure and regulatory standards of emerging market countries are in many respects less stringent than U.S. standards. Issuers are subject to accounting, auditing and financial standards and requirements that differ, in some cases significantly, from those applicable to issuers in the United States or other more developed countries. In particular, the assets and profits appearing on the financial statements of an issuer may not reflect its financial position or results of operations in the way they would be reflected had such financial statements been prepared in accordance with U.S. or European generally accepted accounting principles. There is substantially less publicly available information about emerging market issuers than there is about U.S. issuers.

Foreign Exposure. Foreign securities, foreign currencies, and securities issued by U.S. entities with substantial foreign operations may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments.

Foreign investments involve risks relating to local political, economic, regulatory, or social instability, military action or unrest, or adverse diplomatic developments, and may be affected by actions of foreign governments adverse to the interests of U.S. investors. Such actions may include expropriation or nationalization of assets, confiscatory taxation, restrictions on U.S. investment or on the ability to repatriate assets or convert currency into U.S. Dollars, or other government intervention. Additionally, governmental issuers of foreign debt securities may be unwilling to pay interest and repay principal when due and may require that the conditions for payment be renegotiated. There is no assurance that the relevant sub-advisors will be able to anticipate these potential events or counter their effects. In addition, the value of securities denominated in foreign currencies and of dividends and interest paid with respect to such securities will fluctuate based on the relative strength of the U.S. Dollar.

It is anticipated that in most cases the best available market for foreign securities will be on an exchange or in over-the-counter (“OTC”) markets located outside of the United States. Foreign stock markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. issuers. Foreign security trading, settlement and custodial practices (including those involving securities settlement where Fund assets may be released prior to receipt of payment) are often less developed than those in U.S. markets, and may result in increased risk or substantial delays in the event of a failed trade or the insolvency of, or breach of duty by, a foreign broker-dealer, securities depository, or foreign sub-custodian. In addition, the costs associated with foreign investments, including withholding taxes, brokerage commissions, and custodial costs, are generally higher than with U.S. investments.

Foreign markets may offer less protection to investors than U.S. markets. Foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to U.S. issuers. Adequate public information on foreign issuers may not be available, and it may be difficult to secure dividends and information regarding corporate actions on a timely basis. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of securities exchanges, brokers, and listed companies than in the United States. OTC markets tend to be less regulated than stock exchange markets and, in certain countries, may be totally unregulated. Regulatory enforcement may be influenced by economic or political concerns, and investors may have difficulty enforcing their legal rights in foreign countries.

Some foreign securities impose restrictions on transfer within the United States or to U.S. persons. Although securities subject to such transfer restrictions may be marketable abroad, they may be less liquid than foreign securities of the same class that are not subject to such restrictions.

ADRs as well as other “hybrid” forms of ADRs, including European Depositary Receipts (“EDRs”) and Global Depositary Receipts (“GDRs”), are certificates evidencing ownership of shares of a foreign issuer. These certificates are issued by depository banks and generally trade on an established market in the United States or elsewhere. The underlying shares are held in trust by a custodian bank or similar financial institution in the issuer’s home country. The depository bank may not have physical custody of the underlying securities at all times and may charge fees for various services, including forwarding dividends and interest and corporate actions. ADRs are alternatives to directly purchasing the underlying foreign securities in their national markets and currencies. However, ADRs continue to be subject to many of the risks associated with investing directly in foreign securities. These risks include foreign exchange risk as well as the political and economic risks of the underlying issuer’s country.

Risks of Investing in Foreign Countries. Each of the Funds may invest in companies from different countries. In addition, the Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in securities that are not securities of Asia Pacific ex Japan companies (as defined in the Prospectus), and The Japan Fund, the India Fund and the Greater China Fund each may invest up to 20% of its total assets in securities of companies that are not Japanese companies (as defined in the Prospectus), Indian Companies (as defined in the Prospectus) or Chinese Companies (as defined in the Prospectus), respectively. Such investments by the Funds may be in the securities of companies from any country, including, without limitation, the United States. Each country’s size, level of economic development, and economic and political stability will have an impact on the value of those companies.

14

The Japan Fund, the India Fund and the Greater China Fund concentrate their investments in securities of Japanese companies, Indian companies and Chinese companies, respectively. Consequently, the share price of each of these Funds may be more volatile, and more impacted by political, economic and other events in the country in which they invest than that of mutual funds that are not as geographically concentrated. Information regarding the risks associated with investing in Japan, India and China (including Hong Kong and Taiwan) is included in the Funds’ Prospectus.

An investment in any of the Funds should not be considered a complete investment program; rather it may be used as a vehicle for diversification.

Risks of Investing in India. Foreign investment in the securities of issuers in India is usually restricted or controlled to some degree. In India, “Foreign Institutional Investors” (“FIIs”) may predominantly invest in exchange-traded securities (and securities to be listed, or those approved on the over-the-counter market of India) subject to the conditions specified in the guidelines for Direct Foreign Investment by FIIs in India (the “Guidelines”) published in a Press Note dated September 14, 1992, issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Investment Division, the Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Security by a Person Resident Outside India) Regulations, 2000 and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Foreign Institutional Investors) Regulations, 1995. FIIs have to apply for registration to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) and to the Reserve Bank of India for permission to trade in Indian securities. The Guidelines require SEBI to take into account the track record of the FII, its professional competence, financial soundness, experience and other relevant criteria. SEBI must also be satisfied that suitable custodial arrangements are in place for the Indian securities. NAM Singapore is a registered FII. FIIs and their sub-accounts are required to observe certain investment restrictions, including an ownership ceiling on the total issued share capital of any one Indian company of: (1) 10% for an FII; and (2) 10% for each sub-account categorized as a “broad based fund” or a “proprietary fund” or 5% for sub-accounts registered under the Foreign Companies/Individual category.

In addition, the shareholdings of all registered FIIs may not exceed 24% of the issued share capital of most companies. It is possible that this restriction could be raised or potentially lifted, subject to that company’s approval and the sectoral cap prescribed for Foreign Direct Investment (“FDI”) in the company based on the activities undertaken by it. Only registered FIIs and non-Indian mutual funds that comply with certain statutory conditions may make direct portfolio investments in exchange-traded Indian securities. Under normal circumstances, income, gains and initial capital with respect to such investments are freely repatriable, subject to payment or withholding of applicable Indian taxes. Please see “Taxes — Indian Taxation” below. There can be no assurance that these foreign investment or exchange control regimes will not change in a way that makes it more difficult or impossible for the Funds to reach their investment objectives or repatriate their income, gains and initial capital from India.

A high proportion of the shares of many Indian issuers are held by a limited number of persons or entities, which may limit the number of shares available for investment by a Fund. In addition, further issuances, or the perception that such issuances may occur, of securities by Indian issuers in which a Fund has invested could dilute the earnings per share of that Fund’s investment and could adversely affect the market price of such securities. Sales of securities by such issuer’s major shareholders, or the perception that such sales may occur, may also significantly and adversely affect the market price of such securities and, in turn, a Fund’s investment. A limited number of issuers represent a disproportionately large percentage of market capitalization and trading value. The limited liquidity of the Indian securities markets may also affect a Fund’s ability to acquire or dispose of securities at the price and time that it desires.

The ability of the Funds to invest in Indian securities, exchange Indian rupees into U.S. dollars and repatriate investment income, capital and proceeds of sales realized from their investments in Indian securities is subject to the Indian Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, and the rules, regulations and notifications issued thereunder. There can be no assurance that the Indian government in the future, whether for purposes of managing its balance of payments or for other reasons, will not impose restrictions on foreign capital remittances abroad or otherwise modify the exchange control regime applicable to foreign institutional investors in such a way that may adversely affect the ability of the Funds to repatriate their income and capital. If for any reason a Fund is unable, through borrowing or otherwise, to distribute an amount equal to substantially all of its investment company taxable income (as defined for U.S. tax purposes, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid) within the applicable time periods, a Fund would cease to qualify for the favorable tax treatment afforded to regulated investment companies under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.

Religious and border disputes persist in India. Moreover, India has from time to time experienced civil unrest and hostilities with neighboring countries such as Pakistan. Both India and Pakistan have tested nuclear arms, and the threat of deployment of such weapons could hinder development of the Indian economy and escalating tensions could impact the broader region. The Indian government has confronted separatist movements in several Indian states. The long-standing dispute with Pakistan over the bordering Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir, a majority of whose population is Muslim, remains unresolved. If the Indian government is unable to control the violence and disruption associated with these tensions, the results could destabilize the economy and, consequently, adversely affect a Fund’s investments.

15

Risks of Investing in Latin America. As an emerging market, Latin America historically suffered from social, political, and economic instability. For investors, this has meant additional risk caused by periods of regional conflict, political corruption, totalitarianism, protectionist measures, nationalization, hyperinflation, debt crises, sudden and large currency devaluation, and intervention by the military in civilian and economic spheres. However, in some Latin American countries, a move to sustainable democracy and a more mature and accountable political environment is under way. Domestic economies have been deregulated, privatization of state-owned companies is almost completed and foreign trade restrictions have been relaxed. Nonetheless, to the extent that events such as those listed above continue in the future, they could reverse favorable trends toward market and economic reform, privatization, and removal of trade barriers, and result in significant disruption in securities markets in the region. In addition, recent favorable economic performance in much of the region has led to a concern regarding government overspending in certain Latin American countries. Investors in the region continue to face a number of potential risks. Certain Latin American countries depend heavily on exports to the United States. Accordingly, these countries may be sensitive to fluctuations in U.S. demand and changes in U.S. market conditions.

A number of Latin American countries are among the largest debtors of developing countries and have a long history of foreign debt and default. The majority of the region’s economies have become highly dependent upon foreign credit and loans from external sources to fuel their state-sponsored economic plans. Historically, government profligacy and ill-conceived plans for modernization have exhausted these resources with little benefit accruing to the economy. Most countries have been forced to restructure their loans or risk default on their debt obligations. In addition, interest on the debt is subject to market conditions and may reach levels that would impair economic activity and create a difficult and costly environment for borrowers. Accordingly, these governments may be forced to reschedule or freeze their debt repayment, which could negatively affect local markets.

Risks of Investing in Europe. The European Union (“EU”) is an intergovernmental and supranational union of most Western European countries and a growing number of Eastern European countries, each known as a member state. One of the key activities of the EU is the establishment and administration of a common single market, consisting of, among other things, a single currency and a common trade policy. In order to pursue this goal, member states established, among other things, the European Economic and Monetary Union (“EMU”) which sets out different stages and commitments that member states need to follow to achieve greater economic policy coordination and monetary cooperation, including the adoption of a single currency, the Euro. Many member states have adopted, and other member states are generally expected to eventually adopt, the Euro as their single currency. When a member state adopts the Euro as its currency, the member state no longer controls its own monetary policies. Instead, the authority to direct monetary policy is exercised by the European Central Bank. However, certain countries do not qualify for the Euro and thus risk being left behind.

While economic and monetary convergence in the EU may offer new opportunities for those investing in the region, investors should be aware that the success of the EU is not wholly assured. European countries can be significantly affected by the tight fiscal and monetary controls that the EMU imposes on its members or requires candidates for EMU membership to comply with. Europe must grapple with a number of challenges, any one of which could threaten the survival of this monumental undertaking. The countries adopting the Euro must adjust to a unified monetary system, the absence of exchange rate flexibility, and the loss of economic sovereignty. Europe’s economies are diverse, its governments are decentralized, and its cultures differ widely. Unemployment in some European countries has historically been higher than in the United States and could pose political risk. One or more member states might exit the EU, placing its currency and banking system in jeopardy. Major issues currently facing the EU cover its membership, structure, procedures and policies; they include the adoption, abandonment or adjustment of the new constitutional treaty, the EU’s enlargement to the south and east, and resolving the EU’s problematic fiscal and democratic accountability. Efforts of the member states to continue to unify their economic and monetary policies may increase the potential for similarities in the movements of European markets and reduce the benefit of diversification within the region.

Political. The EU has been extending its influence to the east. It has accepted several Eastern European countries as new members, and has plans to accept several more in the medium-term. It is hoped that membership for these states will help cement economic and political stability. For these countries, membership serves as a strong political impetus to employ tight fiscal and monetary policies. Nevertheless, new member states which were former Soviet satellites remain burdened to various extents by the inherited inefficiencies of centrally planned economies similar to what existed under the old Soviet Union. Further expansion of the EU has long-term economic benefits, but certain European countries are not viewed as currently suitable for membership, especially the troubled economies of countries further east. Also, as the EU continues to enlarge, the candidate countries’ accessions may grow more controversial. Some member states may reject certain candidate countries that hope to join the EU because of concerns about the possible economic, immigration, and cultural implications that may result from such enlargement. The current and future status of the EU therefore continues to be the subject of political controversy, with widely differing views both within and between member states. For example, a large segment of the population in the United Kingdom may be indifferent or opposed to the EU, while other countries are generally more in favor of European integration.

16

It is possible that the gap between rich and poor within the EU’s member countries, and particularly among new members that have not met the requirements for joining the EMU, may increase, and that realigning traditional alliances could alter trading relationships and potentially provoke divisive socioeconomic splits.

In the transition to the single economic system, significant political decisions will be made which may affect the market regulation, subsidization, and privatization across all industries, from agricultural products to telecommunications.

Economic. As economic conditions across member states may vary widely, there is continued concern about national-level support for the Euro and the accompanying coordination of fiscal and wage policy among EMU member countries. According to the Maastricht Treaty, member countries must maintain tight control over inflation, public debt, and budget deficit in order to qualify for participation in the Euro. These requirements severely limit EMU member countries’ ability to implement monetary policy to address regional economic conditions.

Risks of Investing in the Middle East and Africa. Investing in Middle Eastern and African securities is highly speculative and involves significant risks and special considerations not typically associated with investing in the securities markets of the U.S. and most other developed countries. Many Middle Eastern and African countries historically have suffered from political instability. Despite a growing trend towards democratization, especially in Africa, significant political risks continue to affect some Middle Eastern and African countries. In addition, Middle Eastern and African countries historically have suffered from economic instability. Certain Middle Eastern and African markets may face a higher concentration of market capitalization, greater illiquidity and greater price volatility than that found in more developed markets of Western Europe or the United States.

THE INVESTMENT ADVISOR AND THE SUB-ADVISORS

Effective November 1, 2008, Nomura Asset Management U.S.A. Inc. (“NAM USA”) became the investment advisor for The Japan Fund. Effective December 22, 2008, NAM USA became the investment advisor to each of the Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund, the India Fund, the Greater China Fund, the Global Equity Income Fund, the Global Emerging Markets Fund, the Global Alpha Equity Fund, the International Growth Equity Fund and the International Equity Fund. NAM USA, a New York corporation with its office located at Two World Financial Center, Building B, New York, New York 10281, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nomura Asset Management Co., Ltd. (“NAM Tokyo”). NAM USA provides global investment advisory services, primarily with respect to Japanese securities and other Pacific Basin securities, for North American institutional clients and pooled investment vehicles.

Under its investment advisory agreements with the Funds (the “Investment Advisory Agreements”), NAM USA agrees to provide, or arrange for the provision of, investment advisory and certain management services to the Funds, subject to the oversight and supervision of the Board of the Corporation. NAM USA is also obligated to provide all the office space, facilities, equipment and personnel necessary to perform its duties thereunder.

NAM USA, with respect to each Fund, has entered into a sub-advisory agreement (each, a “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with the sub-advisors set forth below, pursuant to which the sub-advisor provides certain investment advisory services to NAM USA with respect to a Fund.

Fund	Sub-Advisor(s)
The Japan Fund	NAM Tokyo
Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	Nomura Asset Management Singapore Limited (“NAM Singapore”)
India Fund	NAM Singapore
Greater China Fund	Nomura Asset Management Hong Kong Limited (“NAM Hong Kong”)
Global Equity Income Fund	NAM Tokyo, NAM Singapore, Nomura Asset Management U.K. Limited (“NAM UK”)
Global Emerging Markets Fund	Martin Currie Inc. (“Martin Currie”)
Global Alpha Equity Fund	Martin Currie
International Growth Equity Fund	McKinley Capital Management, LLC (“McKinley Capital”)
International Equity Fund	NAM UK

NAM Tokyo, a Japanese corporation with its principal office located at 1-12-1, Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8260, Japan, provides investment advisory services for Japanese and international clients. Each of NAM Hong Kong, NAM Singapore and NAM UK is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NAM Tokyo.

17

NAM Tokyo and its investment advisory subsidiaries had approximately $238.2 billion in assets under management as of December 31, 2009. NAM Tokyo is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nomura Holdings, Inc. Nomura Securities Co., Ltd., also owned by Nomura Holdings, Inc., is one of the largest securities companies in Japan.

Martin Currie, a New York corporation, is a registered investment advisor and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Martin Currie Ltd. (“MC Ltd.”), a company incorporated in Scotland, with its registered office at Saltire Court, 20 Castle Terrace, Edinburgh, Scotland EH1 2ES.

Martin Currie is part of a group of companies owned by MC Ltd., which includes three operating subsidiaries: Martin Currie Inc., Martin Currie Investment Management Ltd., (“MCIM”) and Martin Currie Unit Trusts Limited (collectively, the “Martin Currie Group”). As of December 31, 2009, the Martin Currie Group had assets under management totaling approximately $19.1 billion.

McKinley Capital, a Delaware limited liability company, was reorganized and converted on November 5, 2008 from an Alaska corporation, McKinley Capital Management, Inc. (“MCM, AK”), which was founded in 1990, to a Delaware limited liability company (by way of merger with a newly formed entity).

Robert B. Gillam, who serves in a representative capacity for two separate trusts which as of the date of this SAI are the sole shareholders of McKinley Capital. As of December 31, 2009, McKinley Capital had assets under management totaling approximately $12.7 billion.

Management-Related Expenses. Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreements, each Fund is responsible for payment of all expenses other than those specifically payable by NAM USA.

Advisory Fees. For the services of NAM USA under the Investment Advisory Agreements, each Fund pays NAM USA a monthly advisory fee at an annual rate of such Fund’s average daily net assets as set forth below:

The Japan Fund	0.60% on the first $200 million; 0.55% on the next $200 million; and 0.50% on the Fund’s average daily net assets in excess of $400 million.
Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	1.10% on the first $1 billion; 1.00% on the next $1 billion; and 0.95% on the Fund’s average daily net assets in excess of $2 billion. The calculation of the Fund’s average daily net assets excludes assets invested in other Funds that are series of the Corporation.
India Fund	1.20% on the first $1 billion; 1.10% on the next $1 billion; and 1.00% on the Fund’s average daily net assets in excess of $2 billion.
Greater China Fund	1.20% on the first $1 billion; 1.10% on the next $1 billion; and 1.00% on the Fund’s average daily net assets in excess of $2 billion.
Global Equity Income Fund	0.90% on the first $500 million; 0.85% on the next $500 million; 0.80% on the next $500 million; 0.75% on the next $500 million; and 0.70% on assets greater than $2 billion.
Global Emerging Markets Fund	1.20% on the first $1 billion; 1.10% on the next $1 billion; and 1.00% on the Fund’s average daily net assets in excess of $2 billion.
Global Alpha Equity Fund	1.10% on the first $1 billion; 1.00% on the next $1 billion; and 0.90% on the Fund’s average daily net assets in excess of $2 billion.
International Growth Equity Fund	1.05% on the first $1 billion; 0.95% on the next $1 billion; and 0.85% on the Fund’s average daily net assets in excess of $2 billion.
International Equity Fund	0.85%. The calculation of the Fund’s average daily net assets excludes assets invested in other Funds that are series of the Corporation.

18

With respect to Class A, Class C and Class I shares of each Fund, and with respect to Class S shares of The Japan Fund, NAM USA has agreed to waive its advisory fee and, if necessary, to reimburse other operating expenses of a Fund to the extent necessary to limit total annual operating expenses (excluding distribution and service (12b-1) fees, interest expense and certain other expenses), on an annualized basis, to 1.60% for The Japan Fund; to 1.60% for the Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund; 1.70% for the India Fund; 1.70% for the Greater China Fund; 1.50% for the Global Equity Income Fund; 1.70% for the Global Emerging Markets Fund; 1.60% for the Global Alpha Equity Fund; 1.50% for the International Growth Equity Fund; and 1.50% for the International Equity Fund, in each case as a percentage of average daily net assets allocated to each such class of shares of such Fund, until January 28, 2011. If, within three years following a waiver, the operating expenses of a share class of a Fund that previously received a waiver or reimbursement from NAM USA are less than the expense limit for such share class, the share class is required to repay NAM USA up to the amount of fees waived or expenses reimbursed under the agreement if NAM USA or an affiliate serves as such Fund’s investment advisor at such time.

NAM USA has agreed to waive a 10 basis point portion (0.10%) of its investment advisory fee for a period of 24 months, commencing on the effective date of The Japan Fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement.

For the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009, the Funds paid advisory fees to NAM USA as follows:

Fund	Actual Total Advisory Fees Paid to NAM USA ($)
The Japan Fund	$	1,087,392
Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	$	49,648
India Fund	$	55,608
Greater China Fund	$	53,218
Global Equity Income Fund	$	34,303
Global Emerging Markets Fund	$	54,567
Global Alpha Equity Fund	$	44,126
International Growth Equity Fund	$	51,069
International Equity Fund	$	22,328

Each sub-advisor receives compensation for its services out of NAM USA’s advisory fee. The sub-advisor service fee rates that NAM USA pays to unaffiliated sub-advisors are as follows:

Average Daily Net Assets	Annual Rate
Global Emerging Markets Fund
First $1 billion	0.55	%
Next $1 billion	0.60	%
Amount over $2 billion	0.50	%
Global Alpha Equity Fund
First $1 billion	0.55	%
Next $1 billion	0.50	%
Amount over $2 billion	0.45	%
International Growth Equity Fund
First $10 million	0.75	%
Next $15 million	0.65	%
Next $25 million	0.60	%
Next $100 million	0.50	%
Next $100 million	0.47	%
Amounts not less than $250 million
First $250 million	0.45	%
Next $250 million	0.40	%
Amount over $500 million	0.37	%

For the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009, NAM USA paid sub-advisory fees to unaffiliated sub-advisors on behalf of the Funds as follows:

Fund	Sub-Advisor	Advisory Fees Paid to Sub- Advisor ($)
Global Emerging Markets Fund	Martin Currie	$	27,284
Global Alpha Equity Fund	Martin Currie	$	22,064
International Growth Equity Fund	McKinley Capital	$	36,615

19

Fidelity Management & Research Company (“FMR”) served as the investment advisor to The Japan Fund prior to November 1, 2008. FMR was compensated based on the same fee schedule applicable to NAM USA under the Investment Advisory Agreement. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the fiscal period January 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006 and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, FMR received investment advisory fees from the Fund of $1,814,422, $2,292,220, $2,044,460 and $2,382,060, respectively.

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS

The Japan Fund

Four portfolio managers of NAM Tokyo are primarily responsible for the management of The Japan Fund: Mr. Shigeru Hirabayashi, who joined NAM Tokyo in 1988, is the lead portfolio manager; and Messrs. Kentaro Takayanagi, Tomoyuki Takahashi and Hitoshi Nagasawa are the other principal members of the team.

Other Funds and Accounts Managed. The following table sets forth information about funds and accounts other than the Fund for which the Fund’s portfolio managers are primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management as of December 31, 2009.

	Number of Other Accounts Managed and Assets by Account Type					Number of Accounts and Assets for Which the Advisory Fee is Performance-Based
Names of Portfolio Managers	Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles		Other Accounts		Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	Other Accounts
Shigeru Hirabayashi	0		1		0	0	0	0
		$	1,711,000,000
Kentaro Takayanagi	0		2		4	0	0	0
		$	2,436,000,000	$	439,000,000
Tomoyuki Takahashi	0		1		0	0	0	0
		$	1,711,000,000
Hitoshi Nagasawa	0		3		0	0	0	0
		$	1,723,000,000

Securities Ownership of Portfolio Managers. As of December 31, 2009, the portfolio managers listed above did not own beneficially any securities issued by the Fund.

Portfolio Manager Compensation Structure. The portfolio managers receive a combination of base compensation and discretionary compensation consisting of a cash bonus. The methodology used to determine each portfolio manager’s compensation is applied across all accounts managed by the portfolio manager.

Base Salary Compensation. Generally, the portfolio managers receive fixed salary compensation based on their duties and performance. The amount of base salary is reviewed after completion of the formal performance appraisal process. In order to appraise each portfolio manager’s performance, certain measures are used, such as a review of his specialties and expertise, a review of his capabilities to achieve assigned duties and a review of his management and communication skills.

Discretionary Compensation. In addition to base compensation, each portfolio manager may receive discretionary compensation in the form of a cash bonus. The bonus is based on both quantitative and qualitative scores. The quantitative score is based on the performance of the portfolio manager’s accounts. The quantitative scoring for purposes of the bonus comprises 60 to 80% of the performance appraisal measurement. As indicated above, the portfolio managers are responsible for multiple accounts. The quantitative scoring generally takes into the performance of each of these accounts, as well as a peer group comparison. The performance is computed on a pre-tax basis over the average of the most recent one-year, three-year and five-year periods, compared against the benchmarks established for such accounts during the same periods. In evaluating the performance of the Fund, NAM Tokyo will utilize the performance of the TOPIX as the benchmark. The performance is determined not only by the performance of the portfolios managed by the portfolio manager, but also by analyzing the quality of the portfolio manager’s contribution to NAM Tokyo, focusing primarily on the contribution to the management of the investment team and to client service and marketing. While the bonus can represent up to 100% or more of base salary, NAM Tokyo has indicated that cash bonuses typically represent approximately 20 to 40% of a portfolio manager’s aggregate cash compensation. For portfolio managers who are members of NAM Tokyo’s Investment Strategy Committee, consideration is also given to their contributions to investment decisions made by the Committee.

Potential Material Conflicts of Interest. Real, potential or apparent conflicts of interest may arise where a portfolio manager has day-to-day responsibilities with respect to more than one account. These conflicts include the following: (i) the process for allocation of investments among multiple accounts for which a particular investment may be appropriate, (ii) allocation of a portfolio manager’s

20

time and attention among relevant accounts, and (iii) circumstances where NAM Tokyo has an incentive fee arrangement or other interest with respect to one account that does not exist with respect to other accounts.

Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund

Three portfolio managers of NAM Singapore are primarily responsible for the management of the Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund: Mr. Graham Muirhead, Mr. Ken Leong and Ms. Serene Chng.

Other Funds and Accounts Managed. The following table sets forth information about funds and accounts other than the Fund for which the Fund’s portfolio managers are primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management as of December 31, 2009.

	Number of Other Accounts Managed and Assets by Account Type					Number of Accounts and Assets for Which the Advisory Fee is Performance-Based
Names of Portfolio Managers	Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles		Other Accounts		Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles		Other Accounts
Graham Muirhead	0		0		3	0		0		0
				$	1,938,000,000
Ken Leong	0		1		6	0		1		0
		$	9,000,000	$	1,344,000,000		$	9,000,000
Serene Chng	0		4		3	0		0		1
		$	128,000,000	$	495,000,000				$	280,000

Securities Ownership of Portfolio Managers. As of December 31, 2009, the portfolio managers listed above did not own beneficially any securities issued by the Fund.

Portfolio Manager Compensation Structure. The portfolio managers receive a combination of base compensation and discretionary compensation consisting of a cash bonus. The methodology used to determine each portfolio manager’s compensation is applied across all accounts managed by the portfolio manager.

Base Salary Compensation. Generally, the portfolio managers receive fixed salary compensation based on their duties and performance. The amount of base salary is reviewed annually after completion of the formal performance appraisal process. In order to appraise the portfolio manager’s performance, certain measures are used, such as a review of his or her specialties and expertise, a review of his or her capabilities to achieve assigned duties and a review of his or her management and communication skills.

Discretionary Compensation. In addition to base compensation, the portfolio managers may receive discretionary compensation in the form of a cash bonus. The bonus, which is paid annually, is based on both quantitative and qualitative scores. The quantitative score is based on the performance of each portfolio manager’s accounts, measured on a pre-tax basis for rolling three-year periods against the pre-determined benchmarks. In evaluating performance for the Fund, NAM Singapore will utilize the performance of the MSCI Asia Pacific ex Japan Index as the benchmark. The quantitative scoring for purposes of the bonus comprises 60% of the performance appraisal measurement. The qualitative score is determined by analyzing the quality of the portfolio manager’s contribution to NAM Singapore. While the bonus can represent up to 100% or more of base salary, NAM Singapore has indicated that cash bonuses typically represent approximately 20 to 40% of its portfolio managers’ aggregate cash compensation.

Potential Material Conflicts of Interest. Real, potential or apparent conflicts of interest may arise where a portfolio manager has day-to-day responsibilities with respect to more than one account. These conflicts include the following: (i) the process for allocation of investments among multiple accounts for which a particular investment may be appropriate, (ii) allocation of a portfolio manager’s time and attention among relevant accounts, and (iii) circumstances where NAM Singapore has an incentive fee arrangement or other interest with respect to one account than does not exist with respect to other accounts.

India Fund

Two portfolio managers of NAM Singapore are primarily responsible for the management of the India Fund: Mr. Vipul Mehta and Mr. Vipin Kapoor.

Other Funds and Accounts Managed. The following table sets forth information about funds and accounts other than the Fund for which the Fund’s portfolio managers are primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management as of December 31, 2009.

21

	Number of Other Accounts Managed and Assets by Account Type					Number of Accounts and Assets for Which the Advisory Fee is Performance-Based
Names of Portfolio Managers	Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles		Other Accounts		Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles		Other Accounts
Vipul Mehta	0		3		1	0		1	0
		$	1,143,000,000	$	145,000,000		$	132,000,000
Vipin Kapoor	0		0		0	0		0	0

Securities Ownership of Portfolio Managers. As of December 31, 2009, the portfolio managers listed above did not own beneficially any securities issued by the Fund.

Portfolio Manager Compensation Structure. The portfolio managers receive a combination of base compensation and discretionary compensation consisting of a cash bonus. The methodology used to determine each portfolio manager’s compensation is applied across all accounts managed by the portfolio manager.

Base Salary Compensation. Generally, the portfolio managers receive fixed salary compensation based on their duties and performance. The amount of base salary is reviewed annually after completion of the formal performance appraisal process. In order to appraise the portfolio manager’s performance, certain measures are used, such as a review of his specialties and expertise, a review of his capabilities to achieve assigned duties and a review of his management and communication skills.

Discretionary Compensation. In addition to base compensation, the portfolio managers may receive discretionary compensation in the form of a cash bonus. The bonus, which is paid annually, is based on both quantitative and qualitative scores. The quantitative score is determined prior to payment based on the performance of each portfolio manager’s accounts, measured on a pre-tax basis for rolling three-year periods against the pre-determined benchmarks. In evaluating performance for the Fund, NAM Singapore will utilize the performance of the MSCI India Index as the benchmark. The quantitative scoring for purposes of the bonus comprises 60% of the performance appraisal measurement. The qualitative score is determined by analyzing the quality of the portfolio manager’s contribution to NAM Singapore. While the bonus can represent up to 100% or more of base salary, NAM Singapore has indicated that cash bonuses typically represent approximately 20 to 40% of its portfolio managers’ aggregate cash compensation.

Potential Material Conflicts of Interest. Real, potential or apparent conflicts of interest may arise where a portfolio manager has day-to-day responsibilities with respect to more than one account. These conflicts include the following: (i) the process for allocation of investments among multiple accounts for which a particular investment may be appropriate, (ii) allocation of a portfolio manager’s time and attention among relevant accounts, and (iii) circumstances where NAM Singapore has an incentive fee arrangement or other interest with respect to one account than does not exist with respect to other accounts.

Greater China Fund

Two portfolio managers of NAM Hong Kong are primarily responsible for the management of the Greater China Fund: Mr. Kingston Lee and Mr. Shen Xiao Min.

Other Funds and Accounts Managed. The following table sets forth information about funds and accounts other than the Fund for which the Fund’s portfolio managers are primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management as of December 31, 2009.

	Number of Other Accounts Managed and Assets by Account Type					Number of Accounts and Assets for Which the Advisory Fee is Performance-Based
Names of Portfolio Managers	Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles		Other Accounts		Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	Other Accounts
Kingston Lee	0		6		1	0	0	0
		$	1,280,000,000	$	435,000,000
Shen Xiao Min	0		2		0	0	0	0
		$	82,000,000

Securities Ownership of Portfolio Managers. As of December 31, 2009, the portfolio managers listed above did not own beneficially any securities issued by the Fund.

Portfolio Manager Compensation Structure. The portfolio managers receive a combination of base compensation and discretionary compensation consisting of a cash bonus. The methodology used to determine each portfolio manager’s compensation is applied across all accounts managed by the portfolio manager.

22

Base Salary Compensation. The portfolio managers receive fixed salary compensation based on their duties and performance. The amount of base salary is reviewed annually after completion of the formal performance appraisal process. In order to appraise the portfolio manager’s performance, certain measures are used, such as a review of his specialties and expertise, a review of his capabilities to achieve assigned duties and a review of his management and communication skills.

Discretionary Compensation. In addition to base compensation, the portfolio managers may receive discretionary compensation in the form of a cash bonus. The bonus, which is paid annually, is based on both quantitative and qualitative scores. The quantitative score is determined prior to payment based on the performance of each portfolio manager’s accounts, measured on a pre-tax basis for rolling three-year periods against the pre-determined benchmarks. In evaluating performance for the Fund, NAM Hong Kong will utilize the performance of the MSCI Golden Dragon Index as the benchmark. The quantitative scoring for purposes of the bonus comprises 60% of the performance appraisal measurement. The qualitative score is determined by analyzing the quality of the portfolio manager’s contribution to NAM Hong Kong. While the bonus can represent up to 100% or more of base salary, the NAM Hong Kong has indicated that cash bonuses typically represent approximately 20 to 40% of its portfolio managers’ aggregate cash compensation.

Potential Material Conflicts of Interest. Real, potential or apparent conflicts of interest may arise where a portfolio manager has day-to-day responsibilities with respect to more than one account. These conflicts include the following: (i) the process for allocation of investments among multiple accounts for which a particular investment may be appropriate, (ii) allocation of a portfolio manager’s time and attention among relevant accounts, and (iii) circumstances where NAM Hong Kong has an incentive fee arrangement or other interest with respect to one account than does not exist with respect to other accounts.

Global Equity Income Fund

Two portfolio managers of NAM Tokyo are primarily responsible for the management of the Global Equity Income Fund: Mr. Hideyuki Aoki and Mr. Akira Ueno.

Other Funds and Accounts Managed. The following table sets forth information about funds and accounts other than the Fund for which the Fund’s portfolio managers are primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management as of December 31 2009.

	Number of Other Accounts Managed and Assets by Account Type				Number of Accounts and Assets for Which the Advisory Fee is Performance-Based
Names of Portfolio Managers	Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles		Other Accounts	Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	Other Accounts
Hideyuki Aoki	0		4	0	0	0	0
		$	3,632,000,000
Akira Ueno	0		4	0	0	0	0
		$	3,632,000,000

Securities Ownership of Portfolio Managers. As of December 31, 2009, the portfolio managers listed above did not own beneficially any securities issued by the Fund.

Portfolio Manager Compensation Structure. The portfolio managers receive a combination of base compensation and discretionary compensation consisting of a cash bonus. The methodology used to determine each portfolio manager’s compensation is applied across all accounts managed by the portfolio manager.

Base Salary Compensation. Generally, the portfolio managers receive fixed salary compensation based on their duties and performance. The amount of base salary is reviewed after completion of the formal performance appraisal process. In order to appraise each portfolio manager’s performance, certain measures are used, such as a review of his specialties and expertise, a review of his capabilities to achieve assigned duties and a review of his management and communication skills.

Discretionary Compensation. In addition to base compensation, each portfolio manager may receive discretionary compensation in the form of a cash bonus. The bonus is based on both quantitative and qualitative scores. The quantitative score is determined prior to payment based on the performance of the portfolio manager’s accounts. The quantitative scoring for purposes of the bonus comprises 60 to 80% of the performance appraisal measurement. As indicated above, the portfolio managers are responsible for multiple accounts. The quantitative scoring generally takes into the performance of each of these accounts, as well as peer group comparison. The performance is computed on a pre-tax basis over the average of the most recent one-year, three-year and five-year periods, compared against the benchmarks established for such accounts during the same periods. In evaluating the performance of the Fund, NAM Tokyo will utilize the performance of the MSCI World Index as the benchmark. The performance is determined not only by the performance of the portfolios managed by the portfolio manager, but also by analyzing the quality of the portfolio manager’s contribution to NAM Tokyo, focusing primarily on the contribution to the management of the investment team and to client service and marketing. While the bonus can represent up to 100% or more of base salary, NAM Tokyo has indicated that cash bonuses

23

typically represent approximately 20 to 40% of its portfolio manager’s aggregate cash compensation. For portfolio managers who are members of NAM Tokyo’s Investment Strategy Committee, consideration is also given to their contributions to investment decisions made by the Committee.

Potential Material Conflicts of Interest. Real, potential or apparent conflicts of interest may arise where a portfolio manager has day-to-day responsibilities with respect to more than one account. These conflicts include the following: (i) the process for allocation of investments among multiple accounts for which a particular investment may be appropriate, (ii) allocation of a portfolio manager’s time and attention among relevant accounts and (iii) circumstances where NAM Tokyo has an incentive fee arrangement or other interest with respect to one account than does not exist with respect to other accounts.

Global Emerging Markets Fund

Mr. Dariusz Sliwinski, a portfolio manager of Martin Currie, is primarily responsible for the management of the Global Emerging Markets Fund.

Other Funds and Accounts Managed. The following table sets forth information about funds and accounts other than the Global Emerging Markets Fund for which the Fund’s portfolio manager is primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management as of December 31, 2009.

	Number of Other Accounts Managed and Assets by Account Type						Number of Accounts and Assets for Which the Advisory Fee is Performance-Based
Names of Portfolio Manager	Registered Investment Companies		Other Pooled Investment Vehicles		Other Accounts		Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	Other Accounts
Dariusz Sliwinski		1		1		3	0	0	0
	$	216,000,000	$	41,000,000	$	26,000,000

Securities Ownership of Portfolio Managers. As of December 31, 2009, the portfolio manager listed above did not own beneficially any securities issued by the Fund.

Portfolio Manager Compensation Structure. Martin Currie’s remuneration strategy is designed to recruit and retain high quality staff, and to motivate them with performance-based reward. Its strategy is focused on overall remuneration, which they call “Total Reward,” and is comprised of performance-based incentives, salary, equity and other benefits.

• Martin Currie benchmarks Total Reward against the market using compensation survey data in respect of both Scotland and UK equity management companies.

• Martin Currie’s policy is to target upper quartile Total Reward for individuals who consistently deliver upper quartile performance. Each individual’s performance is assessed annually and Martin Currie defines an upper quartile performer as someone who delivers upper quartile performance consistently over more than one performance period.

Base Salary Compensation. Martin Currie’s policy is that performance based reward is the primary component of total reward for investment professionals. Martin Currie also benchmarks salary against the market and aims to ensure that each individual’s salary is within the range appropriate to the role.

Discretionary Compensation. For investment staff, performance based reward is the most significant component of Total Reward. The components are as follows:

• Performance based remuneration: Remuneration for individual performance is based on the performance of the whole product. There is a claw back arrangement to discourage poor risk management. This bonus is capped at a prescribed maximum percentage of salary.

• Revenue share: Product managers receive a percentage of annual fee revenues less costs. This is payable on existing client funds to ensure a strong focus on existing client relationships. The bonus payable is uncapped.

Equity is a key component of the Martin Currie culture and the business is primarily owned by employees. All staff are encouraged to become shareholders and key investment staff hold equity through a combination of ordinary shares and options.

Performance targets for product managers reflect the products they manage. For sector managers, the emphasis is on the performance of their recommendations.

All members of the investment team receive a base salary. In addition, they receive payments through a range of bonus schemes, one of which is capped to a maximum percentage of salary. This is a range of between 60% and 100% depending on their professional level, and is based upon meeting or exceeding investment performance. These individuals also receive a revenue share based on management fees less costs, which is uncapped, and they may receive a bonus based on hedge fund performance fees if appropriate.

24

This is uncapped also. Equity is part of the reward package and all senior management and most employees own part of the company. There are reinvestment requirements within Martin Currie’s bonus schemes. Options are also granted to key individuals.

The percentage mix of bonus payable varies by the individual involved, their seniority in the firm, the performance generated and their adherence to risk parameters and their wider contribution to the company. In addition all in staff benefit from the equity ownership schemes.

Potential Material Conflicts of Interest. Equitable treatment of client monies is a fundamental ethical principle of Martin Currie’s investment management business. Martin Currie believes that the management of potential conflicts of interest is relevant to the business, regardless of the client mix and fund types.

Martin Currie’s robust code of ethics and strong compliance management demonstrate effective conflict management wherever it could arise. Furthermore, Martin Currie’s corporate structure implicitly provides a layer of self-control. All senior management and most staff hold equity in the company, ensuring personal, corporate and client interests are closely aligned.

Martin Currie’s policy is to pro-rate on all trades, allocating where applicable to the nearest round lot size, unless the allocation is so small it is not viable and it is not in the client’s interest to receive an allocation. Such manual overrides of an otherwise automated process are cleared with the Risk and Compliance team prior to completion.

Global Alpha Equity Fund

Three portfolio managers of Martin Currie are primarily responsible for the management of the Global Alpha Equity Fund: Mr. James Fairweather, Mr. David Sheasby and Mr. Neil Robson.

Other Funds and Accounts Managed. The following table sets forth information about funds and accounts other than the Fund for which the Fund’s portfolio managers are primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management as of December 31, 2009.

	Number of Other Accounts Managed and Assets by Account Type					Number of Accounts and Assets for Which the Advisory Fee is Performance-Based
Names of Portfolio Managers	Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles		Other Accounts		Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	Other Accounts
James Fairweather	0		5		32	0	0	0
		$	295,000,000	$	4,469,000,000
David Sheasby	0		1		25	0	0	0
		$	79,000,000	$	3,692,000,000
Neil Robson	0		4		7	0	0	0
		$	216,000,000	$	777,000,000

Securities Ownership of Portfolio Managers. As of December 31, 2009, the portfolio managers listed above did not own beneficially any securities issued by the Fund.

Portfolio Manager Compensation Structure. Martin Currie’s remuneration strategy is designed to recruit and retain high quality staff, and to motivate them with performance-based reward. Its strategy is focused on overall remuneration, which they call “Total Reward,” and is comprised of performance-based incentives, salary, equity and other benefits.

• Martin Currie benchmarks Total Reward against the market using compensation survey data in respect of both Scotland and UK equity management companies.

• Martin Currie’s policy is to target upper quartile Total Reward for individuals who consistently deliver upper quartile performance. Each individual’s performance is assessed annually and Martin Currie defines an upper quartile performer as someone who delivers upper quartile performance consistently over more than one performance period.

Base Salary Compensation. Martin Currie’s policy is that performance based reward is the primary component of total reward for investment professionals. Martin Currie also benchmarks salary against the market and aims to ensure that each individual’s salary is within the range appropriate to the role.

Discretionary Compensation. For investment staff, performance based reward is the most significant component of Total Reward. The components are as follows:

• Performance based remuneration: Remuneration for individual performance is based on the performance of the whole product. There is a claw back arrangement to discourage poor risk management. This bonus is capped at a prescribed maximum percentage of salary.

25

• Revenue share: Product managers receive a percentage of annual fee revenues less costs. This is payable on existing client funds to ensure a strong focus on existing client relationships. The bonus payable is uncapped.

Equity is a key component of the Martin Currie culture and the business is primarily owned by employees. All staff are encouraged to become shareholders and key investment staff hold equity through a combination of ordinary shares and options.

Performance targets for product managers reflect the products they manage. For sector managers, the emphasis is on the performance of their recommendations.

All members of the investment team receive a base salary. In addition, they receive payments through a range of bonus schemes, one of which is capped to a maximum percentage of salary. This is a range of between 60% and 100% depending on their professional level, and is based upon meeting or exceeding investment performance. These individuals also receive a revenue share based on management fees less costs, which is uncapped, and they may receive a bonus based on hedge fund performance fees if appropriate. This is uncapped also. Equity is part of the reward package and all senior management and most employees own part of the company. There are reinvestment requirements within Martin Currie’s bonus schemes. Options are also granted to key individuals.

The percentage mix of bonus payable varies by the individual involved, their seniority in the firm, the performance generated and their adherence to risk parameters and their wider contribution to the company. In addition all in staff benefit from the equity ownership schemes.

Potential Material Conflicts of Interest. Equitable treatment of client monies is a fundamental ethical principle of Martin Currie’s investment management business. Martin Currie believes that the management of potential conflicts of interest is relevant to the business, regardless of the client mix and fund types.

Martin Currie’s robust code of ethics and strong compliance management demonstrate effective conflict management wherever it could arise. Furthermore, Martin Currie’s corporate structure implicitly provides a layer of self-control. All senior management and most staff hold equity in the company, ensuring personal, corporate and client interests are closely aligned.

Martin Currie’s policy is to pro-rate on all trades, allocating where applicable to the nearest round lot size, unless the allocation is so small it is not viable and it is not in the client’s interest to receive an allocation. Such manual overrides of an otherwise automated process are cleared with the Risk and Compliance team prior to completion.

International Growth Equity Fund

Eight portfolio managers of McKinley Capital are primarily responsible for the management of the International Growth Equity Fund: Mr. Robert B. Gillam, Mr. Robert A. Gillam, Mr. Gregory Samorajski, Mr. Paul Hanson, Mr. Forrest Badgley, Mr. Sheldon Lien, Mr. Brandon Rinner and Miles Wixon.

Other Funds and Accounts Managed. McKinley Capital employs a team approach to portfolio management. McKinley Capital’s portfolio managers are equally responsible for the day-to-day management of the accounts and funds listed in the table below. The following table sets forth information about funds and accounts other than the Fund for which the Fund’s portfolio managers are primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management as of December 31, 2009.

	Number of Other Accounts Managed and Assets by Account Type					Number of Accounts and Assets for Which the Advisory Fee is Performance-Based
Names of Portfolio Managers	Registered Investment Companies		Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	Other Accounts		Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	Other Accounts
Robert B. Gillam,
Robert A. Gillam,
Gregory Samorajski,
Paul Hanson,
Forrest Badgley,
Sheldon Lien
Brandon Rinner
Miles Wixon		8	4		75	0	0	2
	$	778,000,000	672,000,000	$	10,932,000,000			335,000,000

Securities Ownership of Portfolio Managers. As of December 31, 2009, the portfolio managers listed above did not own beneficially any securities issued by the Fund.

26

Portfolio Manager Compensation Structure. Compensation to McKinley Capital’s investment professionals comes in the form of a base salary, cash bonus, deferred compensation and incentive stock options. The base salary is determined by the individual’s years of experience and market rates. The cash bonus, deferred compensation and incentive stock option awards are based solely on the discretion of McKinley Capital’s Executive Committee. There is no performance compensation for any portfolio manager with respect to the Fund.

McKinley Capital also offers healthcare benefits, a 401(k) plan that includes firm matching of employee contributions, and career enhancement opportunities, including financial assistance for those seeking to further their education and/or professional credentials (e.g., university coursework, CFA exam seminars).

McKinley Capital is committed to offering a compensation package that will continue to attract, retain, and motivate talented professionals. Lifestyle and quality of life also play a role in retaining and attracting professionals.

Base Salary Compensation. The base salary is determined by the individual’s years of experience and market rates.

Discretionary Compensation. The cash bonus, deferred compensation and incentive stock option awards are based solely on the discretion of McKinley Capital’s Executive Committee.

Potential Material Conflicts of Interest. McKinley Capital reviews each new relationship for potential conflicts of interest. The firm has policies and procedures in place to manage such potential conflicts of interest, and additional controls may be implemented as deemed advisable to ensure there is fair treatment among accounts for trade opportunities and trade execution. Allocation procedures are periodically reviewed and tested for compliance with the firm’s policy. Trades are generally blocked and shares distributed according to each account’s ability to participate. McKinley Capital will not initiate any short position if another managed account that the firm advises holds the same security as a long position. Certain exceptions may apply but only if approved by the compliance officer. The firm holds all portfolio and trading related personnel responsible for adherence to client guidelines and restrictions. Exceptions may only be made if approved by the compliance officer. The compliance department periodically tests trading for compliance with these restrictions. McKinley Capital also holds all personnel to a strict Code of Ethics that includes personal trading pre-clearance requirements and outside activities approval to further assure clients that conflicts are effectively addressed. McKinley Capital does act as the general partner of several limited partnership commingled investment funds. These accounts are subject to the same conflict of interest restrictions as all other accounts.

Portfolio managers and the traders allocate transactions before execution. When an aggregated order is filled in its entirety, the order is allocated to participating accounts in accordance with the preliminary allocation schedule. Deviations from the preliminary allocation and its justification must be documented in writing by the portfolio manager requesting the trade. An order is considered to be filled in its entirety even if it takes more than a single day to complete the entire transaction as long as there is a reasonable expectation that the order will be filled within a reasonable period. In such cases, the portion of the order completed each day ordinarily will be allocated in accordance with the preliminary allocation schedule using blocks of five shares rounding.

Wherever and whenever possible McKinley Capital bunches, blocks, or aggregates brokerage orders for clients in an omnibus fashion rather than execute individual transactions for each account. Allocations are sent to the broker before the end of the day in accordance with the process described above.

International Equity Fund

Two portfolio managers of NAM UK are primarily responsible for the management of the International Equity Fund: Mr. Richard Bisson and Mr. Emmanuel Raymond.

Other Funds and Accounts Managed. The following table sets forth information about funds and accounts other than the Fund for which the Fund’s portfolio managers are primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management as of December 31, 2009.

	Number of Other Accounts Managed and Assets by Account Type				Number of Accounts and Assets for Which the Advisory Fee is Performance-Based
Names of Portfolio Managers	Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	Other Accounts		Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	Other Accounts
Richard Bisson	0	0		1	0	0	0
			$	92,000,000
Emmanuel Raymond	0	0		2	0	0	0
			$	65,000,000

Securities Ownership of Portfolio Managers. As of December 31, 2009, the portfolio managers listed above did not own beneficially any securities issued by the Fund.

27

Portfolio Manager Compensation Structure. For each portfolio manager listed above, compensation consists of base salary, discretionary bonus and a defined contribution pension plan.

Base Salary Compensation. Generally, the portfolio managers receive fixed salary compensation based on their duties and performance. The amount of base salary is reviewed after completion of the formal performance appraisal process. In order to appraise each portfolio manager’s performance, certain measures are used, such as a review of his specialties and expertise, a review of his capabilities to achieve assigned duties and a review of his management and communication skills.

The defined contribution pension plan is as for all other employees.

Discretionary Compensation. In addition to base compensation, each portfolio manager may receive discretionary compensation in the form of a cash bonus, determined as below:

For Richard Bisson, the bonus has no fixed formula but is dependent on the overall investment performance of the investment team, the general development of the business and growth in assets under management. Bonus may consist of cash and shares of Nomura Holdings, Inc. His compensation is not directly related to the performance or size of any specific portfolio.

For Emmanuel Raymond, the bonus depends on an evaluation of quantitative and qualitative factors. Quantitative factors are tied to the investment performance of specific portfolios with appropriate hurdles set relative to the portfolios’ specific benchmarks. In evaluating performance for the Fund, NAM UK will utilize the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index as the benchmark. Performance is evaluated on a pre-tax basis over one and three years, with an equal weighting given to each. Asset size is not part of the formula, but is considered under the qualitative element. Bonus is paid in cash.

The defined contribution pension plan is as for all other employees.

Potential Material Conflicts of Interest. Real, potential or apparent conflicts of interest may arise where a portfolio manager has day-to-day responsibilities with respect to more than one account. These conflicts include the following: (i) the process for allocation of investments among multiple accounts for which a particular investment may be appropriate, (ii) allocation of a portfolio manager’s time and attention among relevant accounts, and (iii) circumstances where NAM UK has an incentive fee arrangement or other interest with respect to one account than does not exist with respect to other accounts.

CONTROL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISOR AND THE SUB-ADVISORS

NAM USA, NAM Tokyo, NAM Hong Kong, NAM Singapore and NAM UK. NAM USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NAM Tokyo, which is wholly owned by Nomura Holdings, Inc. Nomura Holdings, Inc., a publicly-held company based in Tokyo, Japan, is also the parent of Nomura Securities Co., Ltd., one of the largest securities firms in Japan. Each of NAM Hong Kong, NAM Singapore and NAM UK are also wholly-owned subsidiaries of NAM Tokyo.

Martin Currie. Martin Currie is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Martin Currie Ltd. Martin Currie Ltd. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Martin Currie (Holdings) Ltd (Bermuda). No one person has control over the activities of the firm. Martin Currie has been an independent, employee-owned business for 128 years with directors and staff owning a significant majority of the company. Two external investors collectively own 24.9% of the company’s voting shares. They are Crestview Partners and investment vehicles associated with Lord (Jacob) Rothschild.

McKinley Capital. McKinley Capital is a wholly-owned subsidiary of McKinley Capital Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The Robert B. Gillam Revocable Trust, Robert B. Gillam Trustee, owns 100% of the voting shares of McKinley Capital Management, Inc.

CODE OF ETHICS

NAM USA, NAM Tokyo, NAM Hong Kong, NAM Singapore, NAM UK, Martin Currie and McKinley Capital (the Advisor and the sub-advisors), Foreside Fund Services, LLC (the Funds’ distributor), and the Corporation have each adopted a code of ethics under Rule 17j-1 of the 1940 Act that sets forth employees’ fiduciary responsibilities regarding the Funds, establishes procedures for personal investing, and restricts certain transactions. Employees subject to the codes of ethics may invest in securities for their own investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by the Funds.

PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS

Subject to policies established by the Board of the Corporation, the sub-advisors are primarily responsible for the execution of the Funds’ portfolio transactions. In executing such transactions, the sub-advisors seek to obtain the best net results for the Funds, taking into account such factors as price (including the applicable brokerage commission or dealer spread), size of order, difficulty of

28

execution and the facilities of the firm involved and the firm’s risk in positioning a block of securities. While the sub-advisors generally seek reasonably competitive dealer spreads or commission rates, the Funds do not necessarily pay the lowest spread or commission available.

Each Fund has no obligation to deal with any broker or dealer in execution of transactions in portfolio securities. NAM USA expects that, consistent with each sub-advisor’s policy of obtaining best net results and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, a portion of its portfolio transactions conducted on an agency basis may be conducted through Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. and its affiliates (“Nomura Securities”). In addition, subject to obtaining best net results, securities companies which provide supplemental investment research to NAM USA and/or the sub-advisors to the Funds may receive orders for transactions by a Fund. Information so received will be in addition to and not in lieu of the services required to be performed by NAM USA and the sub-advisors to the Funds under their contractual arrangements relating to the Funds, and their expenses will not necessarily be reduced as a result of the receipt of such supplemental information. It is possible that certain of the supplementary investment research so received will primarily benefit one or more other investment companies or other accounts for which investment discretion is exercised. Conversely, the Funds may be the primary beneficiary of the research or services received as a result of portfolio transactions effected for such other accounts or investment companies.

Costs associated with transactions in foreign securities are generally higher than with transactions in U.S. securities, although, as noted above, each Fund will endeavor to achieve the best net results in effecting such transactions.

29

Transactions with Affiliates

Because of the affiliation of Nomura Securities with the Funds, each Fund is prohibited from engaging in certain transactions involving Nomura Securities absent an exemptive order under the 1940 Act. Without such an order, the Funds are prohibited from engaging in portfolio transactions with Nomura Securities acting as principal. In addition, each Fund is subject to limitations in purchasing securities in offerings in which Nomura Securities participates as an underwriter and may only effect such transactions in accordance with Rule 10f-3 under the 1940 Act.

Nomura Securities may serve as a Fund’s broker in transactions conducted on an exchange and in over-the-counter transactions conducted on an agency basis in accordance with Rule 17e-1 adopted under the 1940 Act.

Trade Allocation

The same security may often be held in the portfolio of a Fund and another fund or account managed by the same sub-advisor. Simultaneous transactions are inevitable when several funds and investment accounts are managed by the same investment advisor, particularly when the same security is suitable for the investment objective of more than one fund or investment account.

When two or more funds or investment accounts are simultaneously engaged in the purchase or sale of the same security, including a futures contract, the prices and amounts are allocated in accordance with procedures believed by the sub-advisor to be appropriate and equitable to the applicable Fund or investment account. In some cases, adherence to these procedures could have a detrimental effect on the price or value of the security as far as the Fund is concerned. In other cases, however, the ability of a Fund to participate in volume transactions will produce better executions and prices for such Fund.

Commissions Paid

Each Fund may pay compensation, including both commissions and spreads, in connection with the placement of portfolio transactions. The amount of brokerage commissions paid by a Fund may change from year to year because of, among other things, changing asset levels, shareholder activity, and/or portfolio turnover.

NAM USA and each sub-advisor effect portfolio transactions without regard to holding period, if, in their judgment, such transactions are advisable in light of a change in circumstance in general market, economic or financial conditions. As a result of these investment policies, the Funds may engage in a substantial number of portfolio transactions.

The total rate of portfolio turnover for each Fund for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009 is as follows:

Fund	Portfolio Turnover (%)
The Japan Fund	140	%
Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	123	%
India Fund	204	%
Greater China Fund	53	%
Global Equity Income Fund	33	%
Global Emerging Markets Fund	84	%
Global Alpha Equity Fund	66	%
International Growth Equity Fund	102	%
International Equity Fund	48	%

The rate of total portfolio turnover of The Japan Fund for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was 95% and 124%, respectively. Variations in turnover rate may be due to fluctuating volume of shareholder purchase and redemption orders, market conditions, or changes in Fund management’s investment outlook.

For the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009, the total amount of brokerage commissions paid by each Fund is as follows:

Fund	Total Brokerage Commissions ($)
The Japan Fund	304,879
Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	37,688
India Fund	17,163
Greater China Fund	15,273
Global Equity Income Fund	7,115
Global Emerging Markets Fund	18,583
Global Alpha Equity Fund	12,526
International Growth Equity Fund	12,273
International Equity Fund	4,406

30

For the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009, each Fund paid brokerage commissions to Nomura Securities as follows:

Fund	Total Brokerage Commissions ($)
The Japan Fund	5,218
Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	0
India Fund	0
Greater China Fund	0
Global Equity Income Fund	0
Global Emerging Markets Fund	0
Global Alpha Equity Fund	0
International Growth Equity Fund	80
International Equity Fund	0

For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the total amount of brokerage commissions paid by The Japan Fund, comprising commissions paid on securities and/or futures transactions, as applicable, were $502,604 and $795,235, respectively.

For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (prior to the time NAM USA became the investment advisor for the Corporation), The Japan Fund paid brokerage commissions to Nomura Securities of $68,390 and $94,814, respectively.

During the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009, the Funds acquired securities of their regular broker-dealers or of their parents as follows:

Fund	Broker Security	Market Value ($)
The Japan Fund	Daiwa Securities Group, Inc.	144,042
	Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.	3,874,479
	Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.	802,120
Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	Macquarie Group Ltd.	94,873
India Fund	None	N/A
Greater China Fund	BOC Hong Kong Holdings Ltd.	135,554
Global Equity Income Fund	JPMorgan Chase & Co.	83,258
	Macquarie Group Ltd.	18,645
Global Emerging Markets Fund	None	N/A
Global Alpha Equity Fund	Credit Suisse Group AG	121,061
	JPMorgan Chase & Co.	194,210
	Morgan Stanley	143,654
International Growth Equity Fund	None	N/A
International Equity Fund	None	N/A

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS

Information regarding the Funds’ disclosure of portfolio information is contained in the Prospectus. Disclosures are made on the Corporation’s website at www.nomurapartnersfunds.com. In order to help ensure that portfolio holdings information is provided in a manner that is in the best interest of each Fund’s shareholders, the Corporation’s Board has adopted policies and procedures with respect to the disclosure of the Funds’ portfolio holdings, as described below. The policies and procedures are intended to prevent the misuse of material non-public information regarding portfolio holdings. The Board provides oversight of compliance with the policies and procedures adopted or approved by the Corporation, NAM USA, the sub-advisors, the administrator, the distributor, the transfer agent, Foreside Compliance Services, LLC (the Corporation’s compliance services provider), and Foreside Management Services, LLC (the Corporation’s treasury services provider).

Public portfolio holdings information may be provided to independent third-party fund reporting services (e.g., Lipper or Morningstar). Such information shall be delivered at the same time it is filed with the SEC or no earlier than the date such information is posted on the website as described in the Prospectus. In order to deliver the information earlier, the applicable Fund must obtain the prior written approval of NAM USA and the applicable sub-advisor. In addition, the reporting service, by agreement, would need to keep the information confidential and not to trade on such information. Between regular Board meetings, the release of non-public portfolio securities holding information requires the approval of the Chief Executive Officer or a Director of the Corporation. Such approval, if any, is reported to the full Board and the Corporation’s Chief Compliance Officer, with an explanation as to why the release of such information was in the best interests of the Fund’s shareholders.

31

The Funds may distribute portfolio holdings information to due diligence departments of broker-dealers, wirehouses and other financial institutions (“Financial Intermediaries”) that regularly analyze the portfolio holdings of mutual funds before their public disclosure, provided that (a) the recipient agrees not to distribute the portfolio holdings or results of the analysis to third parties, other departments or persons who are likely to use the information for purposes of purchasing or selling a Fund’s shares, (b) the recipient agrees not to use the information for investment or trading purposes and (c) the recipient signs a written confidentiality agreement. As of December 22, 2008, there are no arrangements with Financial Intermediaries pursuant to the above policy.

Pursuant to the Corporation’s policies and procedures, except as provided above, each Fund’s portfolio holdings information may not be released prior to the information becoming public. The policy prohibiting the selective disclosure of portfolio holdings applies to all categories of persons, including individual investors, institutional investors, each Fund’s distributor, intermediaries that distribute the applicable Fund’s shares, third-party service providers, rating and ranking organizations and the Fund’s affiliates. Certain limited exceptions (noted above and below) have been approved by the Board of Directors. In addition, the Corporation has adopted and approved policies and procedures, including a Code of Ethics and various policies regarding securities trading and trade allocations to address potential conflicts of interest that may arise. As part of its oversight, the Board receives reports from the Corporation’s Chief Compliance Officer regarding the Funds’ and their service providers’ compliance with these policies, including, if applicable, information with respect to any violations of these procedures and how such violations/conflicts were resolved.

Material non-public information regarding portfolio holdings may be provided as part of the necessary day-to-day operation of the Funds to certain entities on a confidential basis. These entities must either have an explicit agreement to, or by virtue of their respective duties to the applicable Fund, are required to maintain the confidentiality of the information disclosed and may not trade on such information except as necessary in providing services to the Fund. Accordingly, each Fund, on an ongoing periodic basis may disclose non-public portfolio holdings information (on a confidential basis) to the following entities or persons (with the noted frequency and, if applicable, lag time):

The Corporation’s Board	(Quarterly: at least 15 days after the period)
The Fund’s Advisor and Sub-Advisor	(Daily)
The Fund’s Transfer Agent	(Daily)
The Fund’s Distributor	(Quarterly: at least 15 days after the period)
The Fund’s Administrator, Custodian and securities lending agent (if any)	(Daily)
The Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm, BBD, LLP	(Annually and Semi-annually: the first business day after the end of the period; other days within period under audit as required by scope of audit: after the end of the fiscal period)
The Fund’s legal counsel, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP	(Quarterly: at least 15 days after the period)
The Fund’s Compliance Services Provider	(Daily)
The Fund’s Treasury Services Provider	(Daily)
Ernst & Young, LLP, consultant to NAM USA relating to passive foreign investment company status of investments	(Three times a year)

The Corporation believes each of the foregoing recipients, pursuant to contractual or fiduciary obligations, is required to keep all non-public information confidential and is prohibited from trading based on the information, except as necessary in providing services to the Funds.

When engaged in purchasing, selling or lending Fund securities, a Fund may disclose certain information about one or more of the security positions it owns. Although the Funds do not have separate non-disclosure agreements with each of these trading entities or lending agents, they will cease doing business with any entity believed to be misusing the information.

None of the Funds, NAM USA, the sub-advisors or their respective affiliates receive any compensation or other consideration with respect to disclosures of portfolio holdings. If NAM USA or a sub-advisor or any affiliate desired to make such an arrangement, it would seek prior Board approval and any such arrangements would be disclosed in the Corporation’s SAI.

There can be no assurance that the Corporation’s policies and procedures with respect to the selective disclosure of Fund portfolio holdings information will prevent the misuse of such information by individuals or firms that receive such information.

32

THE DISTRIBUTOR

The Corporation and Foreside Fund Services, LLC (the “Distributor” or “Foreside”) are parties to a distribution and shareholder services agreement dated April 26, 2007 and effective on October 1, 2007, which was amended and restated effective as of December 22, 2008 and March 31, 2009 (the “Class S Distribution Agreement”) whereby the Distributor acts as principal underwriter for The Japan Fund’s Class S shares, and a distribution agreement dated December 22, 2008, which was amended and restated effective as of March 31, 2009, whereby the Distributor acts as principal underwriter for each Fund’s Class A, Class C and Class I shares (the “Multi-Class Distribution Agreement” and together with the Class S Distribution Agreement, the “Distribution Agreements”). The Distributor may receive compensation under the Distribution Agreements for distribution of Fund shares (except for Class S shares of The Japan Fund). Pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, each Fund other than Class S shares of The Japan Fund pays a distribution services fee to the Distributor. Pursuant to an agreement between the Distributor and NAM USA, NAM USA has also agreed to compensate and reimburse the Distributor for its provision to the Funds of any distribution services for which the Funds are not authorized to compensate and reimburse the Distributor. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2009, NAM USA paid the Distributor $80,000. The Distributor has its principal business offices at Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100, Portland ME 04101.

The continuance of each Distribution Agreement must be specifically approved at least annually (i) by the vote of the Directors or by a vote of the shareholders of each Fund, and (ii) by the vote of a majority of the Directors who are not parties to such Distribution Agreement or “interested persons” of any party thereto, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. Each Distribution Agreement will terminate automatically in the event of its assignment (as such term is defined in the 1940 Act), and is terminable at any time without penalty by the Directors of the Corporation or, with respect to a Fund, by a majority of the outstanding shares of such Fund or by the Distributor, upon not more than 60 days’ written notice by either party. Each Distribution Agreement provides that the Distributor shall not be protected against any liability to the Funds or their respective shareholders by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on its part in the performance of its duties or from reckless disregard of its obligations or duties thereunder.

THE DISTRIBUTION AND SHAREHOLDER SERVICING PLANS

Class A and Class C Shares (All Funds)

The distribution plan for each of the Class A and Class C shares (each, a “Plan”) provides that each Fund pays the Distributor a shareholder servicing fee, paid monthly, at an annual rate based on the average daily net assets of such Fund attributable to shares of the relevant class. This fee compensates the Distributor, selected securities dealers or other financial intermediaries (pursuant to a sub-agreement) for shareholder servicing activities with respect to Class A and Class C shares.

For the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009, Class A shares of each Fund paid shareholder servicing fees as follows:

Fund	Class A Shareholder Servicing Fees ($)
The Japan Fund	$	10
Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	$	2
India Fund	$	2
Greater China Fund	$	2
Global Equity Income Fund	$	2
Global Emerging Markets Fund	$	11
Global Alpha Equity Fund	$	2
International Growth Equity Fund	$	2
International Equity Fund	$	2

For the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009, Class C shares of each Fund paid shareholder servicing fees as follows:

Fund	Class C Shareholder Servicing Fees ($)
The Japan Fund	$	2
Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	$	5
India Fund	$	2
Greater China Fund	$	4
Global Equity Income Fund	$	2
Global Emerging Markets Fund	$	11
Global Alpha Equity Fund	$	3
International Growth Equity Fund	$	2
International Equity Fund	$	3

33

The Plan for the Class C shares also provides that each Fund pays the Distributor a distribution fee, paid monthly, at an annual rate based on the average daily net assets of the Fund attributable to the Class C shares. This fee compensates the Distributor, selected securities dealers or other financial intermediaries (pursuant to a sub-agreement) for providing shareholder and distribution services and bearing certain distribution-related expenses of each Fund, including payments to financial advisors or other financial intermediaries for selling Class C shares of the Fund. The distribution fee for Class C shares may also be used to finance the costs of advancing brokerage commissions to investment representatives.

34

For the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009, Class C shares of each Fund paid distribution fees as follows:

Fund	Class C Distribution Fees ($)
The Japan Fund	$	5
Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	$	15
India Fund	$	8
Greater China Fund	$	12
Global Equity Income Fund	$	6
Global Emerging Markets Fund	$	34
Global Alpha Equity Fund	$	9
International Growth Equity Fund	$	6
International Equity Fund	$	10

Each Plan is subject to the provisions of Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. In their consideration of a Plan, the Directors must consider all factors they deem relevant, including information as to the benefits of the Plan to each Fund and the related class of shareholders. In approving each Plan in accordance with Rule 12b-1, those Directors of the Corporation who are not considered “interested,” as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Directors”) concluded that there is reasonable likelihood that the Plan will benefit each Fund and its related class of shareholders.

Each Plan provides that, so long as the Plan remains in effect, the Independent Directors then in office will select and nominate other Independent Directors. Each Plan can be terminated at any time, without penalty, by the vote of a majority of the Independent Directors or, with respect to a Fund, by the vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding related class of voting securities of the Fund. A Plan cannot be amended to increase materially the amount to be spent by a Fund without the approval of the related class of shareholders. All material amendments are required to be approved by the vote of Directors, including a majority of the Independent Directors who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the Plan, cast in person at a meeting called for that purpose. Rule 12b-1 further requires that each Fund preserve copies of each Plan and any report made pursuant to such plan for a period of not less than six years from the date of the Plan or such report, the first two years in an easily accessible place.

Among other things, each Plan provides that the Directors will review quarterly reports of the shareholder servicing and/or distribution fees paid to the Distributor. Payments under the Plans are based on a percentage of average daily net assets attributable to the shares regardless of the amount of expenses incurred. As a result, distribution-related revenues from the Plans may be more or less than distribution-related expenses of the related class. Information with respect to the distribution-related revenues and expenses is presented to the Directors for their consideration quarterly. Distribution-related revenues consist of shareholder servicing fees, distribution fees and contingent deferred sales charges (“CDSCs”). Distribution-related expenses consist of, among other things, financial advisor compensation, selling and transaction processing expenses, advertising, sales promotion and marketing expenses and interest expense. The distribution-related revenues paid with respect to one class will not be used to finance the distribution expenditures of another class. Sales personnel may receive different compensation for selling different classes of shares.

The Corporation may enter into written agreements relating to the implementation of the Plans (“Related Agreements”), provided that such agreements have been approved by the Board. Effective December 22, 2008, the Corporation and Foreside have entered into the Multi-Class Distribution Agreement, which constitutes a Related Agreement under Plans relating to the Class A and Class C shares. Pursuant to this Agreement, Foreside performs (directly or through third parties) distribution, promotional, marketing, and shareholder services for the Funds.

Class S Shares (The Japan Fund only)

On June 1, 2005, The Japan Fund’s Class S shareholders approved a 12b-1 Distribution and Shareholder Servicing Plan (“Class S 12b-1 Plan”). Under Class S 12b-1 Plan, the Fund may charge Class S shareholders an annual distribution expense and service fee (“Class S 12b-1 Fee”) to finance distribution and shareholder service expenses pursuant to the terms of Class S 12b-1 Plan. The Class S 12b-1 Fee for Class S shares shall not exceed 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to Class S shares on an annual basis (the “Maximum Fee”). However, prior to January 1, 2009, the Board limited the Class 12b-1 Fee to an amount not to exceed 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to Class S shares on an annual basis; as of January 1, 2009, this limitation is no longer in effect. However, because of a reallocation of service fees paid by Class S for sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing to certain distributor platforms (“Supermarket Platforms”) for Class S, it is not expected that the increase in the Class S 12b-1 Fee will increase the total operating expenses of the Class S shares. The Class S 12b-1 Fee shall be calculated and accrued daily and paid at such intervals as the Board shall determine, subject to any applicable restriction imposed by rules of the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”).

35

Pursuant to the Class S 12b-1 Plan, The Japan Fund, or its Distributor, may enter into written agreements (“Class S Related Agreements”) approved by the Board with one or more securities dealers, financial institutions or any other person, including the Distributor (each such dealer, institution or person, a “Service Organization”) pursuant to which the Fund shall use the Class S 12b-1 Fee to reimburse certain Service Organizations for expenses incurred by the Service Organizations in: (i) undertaking any activity primarily intended to result in sale of Class S shares of the Fund, including promotion and distribution; or (ii) the provision of services to the Class S shareholders of the Fund. The expenses reimbursed pursuant to the Class S 12b-1 Plan may, as determined by the Board, include an element of reasonable profit to the Service Organization. Each Class S Related Agreement shall provide the maximum amount of expenses for which the corresponding Service Organization may be reimbursed on an annual basis (the “Maximum Reimbursable Amount”). The aggregate amount of expenses reimbursable on an annual basis under all Class S Related Agreements may not as of January 1, 2009 exceed 0.25% of the Fund’s Class S average daily net assets on an annual basis. An expense incurred by a Service Organization that is not reimbursable at the time such expense is incurred (including expenses not reimbursable due to the Maximum Reimbursable Amount and Maximum Fee limits) may not be carried forward for future payment. All such expenses shall be the sole responsibility of the Service Organization that incurred such expenses. The Class S 12b-1 Plan also provides that if any payment made by the Fund to a third party is deemed to be indirect financing of any activity primarily intended to result in the sale of Class S shares of the Fund within the meaning of Rule 12b-1, then such payments shall be deemed to be authorized by the Class S 12b-1 Plan.

If any amount of the Class S 12b-1 Fee is not used to reimburse a Service Organization pursuant to a Class S Related Agreement, the Fund may use such remaining amount for its expenses of distributing its shares including, but not limited to, implementing and operating the Class S 12b-1 Plan, as well as payment of capital or other expenses of associated equipment, rent, salaries, bonuses, interest and other overhead costs. If any amount of the Class S 12b-1 Fee is not otherwise used under the Class S 12b-1 Plan, such amount shall be returned to the Fund in such manner as is determined by the Board.

The continuance of the Class S 12b-1 Plan must be specifically approved at least annually by the vote of the Board of the Corporation, including a majority of the Directors who are not “interested persons” of the Fund (as defined by the 1940 Act) and who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of the Class S 12b-1 Plan or in any agreements related to the Class S 12b-1 Plan (the “12b-1 Directors”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval.

Effective October 1, 2007, as amended and restated effective March 31, 2009, the Corporation and Foreside have entered into the Class S Distribution Agreement, which constitutes a Class S Related Agreement under the Class S 12b-1 Plan. Pursuant to this Agreement, Foreside performs (directly or through third parties) distribution and shareholder services for the S Class of The Japan Fund. In return, the S Class of The Japan Fund reimburses Foreside for its expenses incurred in providing these services, subject to a certain maximum amount of reimbursements that Foreside may receive annually (described below).

Foreside shall be reimbursed only to the extent of Foreside’s payment to the third party. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the S Class reimbursed expenses incurred by Foreside in the amount of $140,706 (accrued) pursuant to the terms of the Class S Distribution Agreement. These fees are included in the Fee Table under Distribution/Services (12b-1) Fees and in the Corporation’s financial statements.

Foreside is entitled to be reimbursed from the S Class 12b-1 Fee for the expenses it incurs in performing services under the Class S Distribution Agreement in an amount not to exceed 0.15% prior to January 1, 2009, and 0.25% thereafter, of the Fund’s Class S average daily net assets on an annual basis (the “Maximum Fee”).

Any expense incurred by Foreside under the Class S Distribution Agreement that is not reimbursable under the Class S Distribution Agreement at the time such expense is incurred (including expenses not reimbursable due to the Maximum Fee limit) may not be carried forward for future payment. There were no unreimbursed amounts for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

36

The Distributor pays expenses on behalf of Class S pursuant to the Class S 12b-1 Plan. The following table lists the principal expenses paid by the Distributor since the inception of the Class S 12b-1 Plan (rounded to the nearest whole dollar).

	10/01/2006 – 09/30/2007		10/01/2007 – 09/30/2008		10/01/2008 – 09/30/2009
Administration	$	30,000	$	0	$	0
Advertising	$	0	$	0	$	0
Call Center Expenses	$	44,010	$	0	$	0
Conferences – Exhibit Costs	$	250	$	0	$	0
Creative (Design, Copywriting)	$	265	$	0	$	0
CRM/Sales Tracking	$	43,200	$	300	$	0
Eprints/Reprints	$	0	$	0	$	0
Fulfillment	$	6,802	$	8,077	$	5,437
FINRA (Filing Fees)	$	900	$	0	$	400
Printing	$	2,578	$	4,875	$	1,187
Promotional Items	$	0	$	0	$	0
Reach Mails	$	120	$	0	$	0
Supermarket Platform Fees	$	124,924	$	85,390	$	121,533
Website	$	2,999	$	18,366	$	7,989
Other Marketing	$	7,232	$	9,330	$	4,160
TOTAL	$	263,281	$	126,338	$	140,706

Effective September 1, 2005, SEI Investments Distribution Co. (“SIDCo.”) and the Corporation entered into a Distribution and Shareholder Services Agreement (the “SEI Related Agreement”) wherein SIDCo. became the Distributor of The Japan Fund. Effective September 30, 2007, the SEI Related Agreement was terminated. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, The Japan Fund reimbursed expenses incurred by SIDCo. in the amount of $242,432 pursuant to the terms of the SEI Related Agreement.

In addition to the S Class 12b-1 plan reimbursed expenses paid under the terms of the Class S Distribution Agreement, the S Class also pays, out of the Fund’s assets, service fees for sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing to Supermarket Platforms. Effective January 1, 2009, the Board determined that these payments may not exceed 0.10%. These service fees to Supermarket Platforms are included in the Fee Table under “Other Expenses” and in The Japan Fund’s financial statements.

PAYMENTS TO INTERMEDIARIES

NAM USA and/or its affiliates may compensate intermediaries that distribute shares of a Fund or service investors in a Fund or, at the discretion of a retirement plan’s named fiduciary, make payments to intermediaries for certain plan expenses or otherwise for the benefit of plan participants and beneficiaries. A number of factors are considered in determining whether to pay these additional amounts. In certain situations, such factors may include, without limitation, the level or type of services provided by the intermediary, the level or expected level of assets or sales of shares, access to an intermediary’s personnel, and other factors. In addition to such payments, NAM USA and/or its affiliates may offer other incentives in the form of sponsorship of educational or client seminars relating to current products and issues, assistance in training and educating the intermediaries’ personnel, and/or payments of costs and expenses associated with attendance at seminars, including travel, lodging, entertainment and meals. NAM USA and/or its affiliates anticipate that payments will be made to multiple intermediaries, including broker-dealers and other financial firms, and these payments may be significant. As permitted by SEC and FINRA rules and other applicable laws and regulations, NAM USA and/or its affiliates may pay or allow other incentives or payments to intermediaries.

Some payments, which are sometimes referred to as “revenue sharing,” may represent a premium over payments made by other fund families, and investment professionals may have an added incentive to sell or recommend a Fund or a share class over others offered by competing fund families. Payments for these purposes made by NAM USA or an affiliate from their own resources may vary. Certain of the payments may be offset by 12b-1 fees. It is expected that NAM USA or an affiliate will make payments to these and other intermediaries for similar purposes in the future.

In addition to the sales charges, 12b-1 fees and shareholder service fees, NAM USA and its affiliates may out of their own resources pay additional cash or non-cash incentives to financial intermediaries to encourage the sale of the Funds’ shares. These payments may create an incentive for your financial intermediary to sell and recommend certain investment products, including the Funds, over other products for which it may receive less compensation. You may contact your financial intermediary if you want information regarding the payments it receives.

37

These additional payments may take the form of, among other things, “due diligence” payments for an intermediary’s examination of the Funds and payments for providing extra employee training and information relating to the Funds; “listing” fees for the placement of the Funds on an intermediary’s list of mutual funds available for purchase by its customers; “marketing support” fees for providing assistance in promoting the sale of the Funds’ shares; payments for the sale of shares; payments for shareholder servicing; CUSIP fees; NSCC Account fees; maintenance fees; set-up fees regarding establishment of new accounts; sales contests and promotions where participants receive prizes such as travel awards, merchandise, cash or recognition; and occasional meals, entertainment, tickets to sporting or other events, nominal gifts and travel and lodging (subject to applicable rules and regulations).

The payments may be a fixed dollar amount and/or based on a percentage of the value of shares sold to or held by customers of the intermediary involved and may differ from intermediary to intermediary. Although the individual components may be higher and the total payments made to each qualifying firm in any given year may vary, additional payments may but are not normally expected to exceed (a) 0.25% of the current year’s Fund sales by that firm and (b) 0.10% of average daily net assets attributable to that firm over the year. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2009, NAM USA and its affiliates incurred approximately $119,749 in total of additional payments to financial intermediaries.

As of the date of this Statement of Additional Information, as amended or supplemented from time to time, the financial intermediaries that NAM USA anticipates will receive payments from NAM USA and its affiliates include:

Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.

Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC

Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Pershing LLC

Vanguard Marketing Corporation

Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC

THE TRANSFER AGENT

Boston Financial Data Services, Inc., located at 30 Dan Road, Canton, MA 02021, serves as the Corporation’s transfer and dividend-paying agent (the “Transfer Agent”) pursuant to a Transfer Agency and Services Agreement dated September 28, 2007, as amended effective as of December 22, 2008, and performs bookkeeping, data processing and administrative services for the maintenance of shareholder accounts.

THE CUSTODIAN

State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Custodian”) serves as the Corporation’s custodian pursuant to a Master Custodian and Accounting Services Agreement dated October 1, 2007, as amended effective as of December 4, 2008. The Custodian has its principal business offices at 4 Copley Place, 5^th Floor, CPH – 0326, Boston, MA 02116. The Custodian attends to the collection of principal and income, and payment for and collection of proceeds of securities bought and sold by the Funds.

THE ADMINISTRATOR

General. State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Administrator”) serves as the Corporation’s administrator pursuant to an administration agreement dated October 1, 2007, as amended effective as of December 22, 2008 and as of October 29, 2009. The Administrator has its principal business offices at 4 Copley Place, 5^th Floor, CPH-0326, Boston, MA 02116. The Administrator and its affiliates also serve as administrator or sub-administrator to other mutual funds.

Administration Agreement with the Corporation. The Corporation and the Administrator have entered into the Administration Agreement whereby the Administrator provides, or arranges for the provision of, certain administrative and accounting services for the Funds, including maintaining the books and records of each Fund, and preparing certain reports and other documents required by federal and/or state laws and regulations.

The Administration Agreement provides that the Administrator shall not be liable for any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any loss or damage resulting from the performance or non-performance of its duties under the Administration Agreement unless directly caused by or resulting from the negligence, bad faith or willful misconduct of the Administrator, its officers or employees. The Administrator’s liability is limited to an amount agreed upon between the Administrator and the Corporation.

38

For its services, the Administrator will receive fees from the Funds calculated daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.10% of average daily net assets with reductions as average daily net assets increase to certain levels and subject to certain minimum requirements. The Administrator will also receive fees for certain additional services and reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses. The Administrator or its affiliates do not pay any Fund fees, expenses or costs.

For the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009, each Fund paid fees to the Administrator as follows:

Fund	Fees Paid to Administrator ($)
The Japan Fund	$	327,833
Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	$	124,155
India Fund	$	124,155
Greater China Fund	$	124,155
Global Equity Income Fund	$	124,155
Global Emerging Markets Fund	$	124,155
Global Alpha Equity Fund	$	124,155
International Growth Equity Fund	$	124,155
International Equity Fund	$	124,155

For the fiscal period ended September 30, 2008, The Japan Fund paid fees to the Administrator in the amount of $367,244.

COMPLIANCE SERVICES

Under a Compliance Services Agreement dated April 26, 2007, as amended and restated effective as of December 22, 2008, as of September 1, 2009 and as of December 31, 2009 and amended April 29, 2010 (the “Compliance Agreement”) with the Corporation and subject to approval by the Board, Foreside Compliance Services, LLC (“FCS”) provides a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and an Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer (“AMLCO”) to the Corporation, as well as certain additional compliance support functions (“Compliance Services”), and Foreside Management Services, LLC (“FMS”) provides a Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and a Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”) to the Corporation. FCS and FMS are each an affiliate of the Funds’ Distributor. Neither the Distributor, FCS or FMS, nor any of their officers or employees who serve as an officer of the Funds, has any role in determining the Funds’ investment policies or which securities are to be purchased or sold by the Funds. Certain officers or employees of FCS and FMS are also officers of the Funds. The PEO and PFO, each an officer of the Funds, is a control affiliate and an officer of the Distributor.

For making available the PEO, CCO, AMLCO, and PFO and for providing the Compliance Services under the Compliance Agreement, FCS and FMS receives a fee from the Corporation of $340,000 per annum. FCS and FMS also receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses and employee time associated with certain matters.

The Compliance Agreement with respect to the Corporation continues in effect until terminated, subject to annual renewal. The Compliance Agreement is terminable with or without cause and without penalty by the Board of the Corporation or by FCS and FMS with respect to the Corporation on 60 days’ written notice to the other party.

Under the Compliance Agreement, FCS and FMS are not liable to the Corporation or the Funds’ shareholders for any act or omission, except for willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under the Compliance Agreement. Under the Compliance Agreement, FCS and FMS and their officers, directors and employees are indemnified by the Funds against any and all claims and expenses related to FCS’ or FMS’ actions or omissions, except for any act or omission resulting from FCS’ or FMS’ willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under the Compliance Agreement.

For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the amount charged to the Corporation by FCS and FMS aggregated $279,987, $151,441 and $37,333, respectively.

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The financial highlights of the Corporation included in the Corporation’s Prospectus and the Financial Statements incorporated by reference in this SAI have been so included or incorporated by reference in reliance on the report of BBD, LLP, independent registered public accountants, given on the authority of that firm as experts in accounting and auditing. BBD, LLP, audits the financial statements of the Funds. The Financial Statements for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009 included in the Corporation’s Annual Report to Shareholders dated September 30, 2009 are incorporated by reference in this SAI.

39

LEGAL COUNSEL

Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, 450 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017, serves as legal counsel for the Corporation, its series and the Independent Directors.

PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF SHARES

Additional Information About Opening an Account/Minimum Balances

Shareholders should maintain a share balance worth at least $1,000 ($500 for fiduciary/custodial accounts such as IRAs), which amount may be changed by the Board. A shareholder may open an account with at least $1,000 ($500 for fiduciary/custodial accounts such as IRAs).

Each Fund reserves the right, following 60 days’ written notice to applicable shareholders, to:

• assess an annual $10 charge (paid to the Fund) for any non-fiduciary/custodial account without a systematic investment plan (“SIP”) in place and a balance of less than $1,000; and

• redeem all shares in Fund accounts below $1,000 where a reduction in value has occurred due to a redemption, exchange or transfer out of the account. The applicable Fund will mail the proceeds of the redeemed account to the shareholder.

Fiduciary (e.g., IRA or Roth IRA) and custodial accounts (e.g., UGMA or UTMA) with balances below $500 are subject to automatic redemption following 60 days’ written notice to applicable shareholders. Reductions in value that result solely from market activity will not trigger an involuntary redemption.

Additional Information About Making Subsequent Investments

Subsequent purchase orders for a minimum of $250 and a maximum of $25,000 may be placed by telephone, etc., by established shareholders. Orders placed in this manner may be directed as described in the Corporation’s Prospectus. A confirmation of the purchase will be mailed out promptly following receipt of a request to buy. Federal regulations require that payment be received within three (3) business days. If payment is not received within that time, the order is subject to cancellation. In the event of such cancellation or cancellation at the purchaser’s request, the purchaser will be responsible for any loss incurred by a Fund or the Distributor by reason of such cancellation. If the purchaser is a shareholder, the Fund shall have the authority, as agent of the shareholder, to redeem shares in the account to reimburse the applicable Fund or the Distributor for the loss incurred. Any net profit on the liquidation of unpaid shares will accrue to the applicable Fund.

Checks

A certified check is not necessary, but checks for $50 or more are accepted subject to collection at full face value in United States funds and must be drawn on, or payable through, a United States bank.

If shares of a Fund are purchased by a check that proves to be uncollectible, the Fund reserves the right to cancel the purchase immediately and the purchaser will be responsible for any loss incurred by the Fund or the Distributor by reason of such cancellation. If the purchaser is a shareholder, the Fund shall have the authority, as agent of the shareholder, to redeem shares in the account to reimburse the Fund or the Distributor for the loss incurred. Investors whose orders have been canceled may be prohibited from or restricted in placing future orders in the Funds.

40

Wire Transfer of Federal Funds

To obtain the NAV determined as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) on a selected day, your bank must forward federal funds by wire transfer and provide the required account information so as to be available to the applicable Fund prior to the close of regular trading on the NYSE (normally 4 p.m., Eastern Time).

Share Price

Purchases will be filled without sales charge at the NAV next computed after receipt of the application in good order. NAV normally will be computed for each class as of the close of regular trading on each day during which the NYSE is open for trading. Orders received after the close of regular trading on the NYSE will be executed at the next day’s NAV. If the order has been placed by a member of FINRA, it is the responsibility of the member broker, rather than the Fund, to forward the purchase order to the Transfer Agent by the close of regular trading on the NYSE.

Share Certificates

Due to the desire of the Funds to afford ease of redemption, certificates will not be issued to indicate ownership in any Fund. Share certificates now in a shareholder’s possession may be sent to the Transfer Agent for cancellation and credit to such shareholder’s account. Shareholders who prefer may hold the certificates in their possession until they wish to exchange or redeem such shares.

Other Information

The Corporation may authorize certain members of FINRA to accept purchase and redemption orders for each Fund’s shares. Those brokers may also designate other parties to accept purchase and redemption orders on each Fund’s behalf. Orders for purchase or redemption will be deemed to have been received by the applicable Fund when such brokers or their authorized designees accept the orders. Subject to the terms of the contract between each Fund and the broker, ordinarily orders will be priced at such Fund’s NAV next computed after acceptance by such brokers or their authorized designees. Further, if purchases or redemptions of a Fund’s shares are arranged and settlement is made at an investor’s election through any other authorized FINRA member, that member may, at its discretion, charge a fee for that service. The Board has the right to limit the amount of purchases by, and to refuse to sell to, any person. The Board may suspend or terminate the offering of shares of any Fund at any time for any reason.

The tax identification number section of the application must be completed when opening an account. Applications and purchase orders without a correct certified tax identification number and certain other certified information (e.g., from exempt organizations, certification of exempt status) will be returned to the investor. Each Fund reserves the right, following 30 days’ notice, to redeem all shares in accounts without a correct certified social security or other tax identification number. A shareholder may avoid involuntary redemption by providing the Fund with a tax identification number during the 30-day notice period.

Each Fund may issue shares at NAV in connection with any merger or consolidation with, or acquisition of the assets of, any investment company or personal holding company, subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act.

How To Exchange Shares

You can exchange your Class A, Class C and Class I shares for shares of the same Class of other Funds at NAV by having your financial advisor process your exchange request or by contacting the Transfer Agent directly. You may exchange Class S shares of The Japan Fund for Class A shares of another Fund. Class A shares you receive in exchange for Class S shares may not be exchanged again for Class S shares unless (i) the original exchange of the Class S shares for the Class A shares occurred within 90 days of the requested exchange of Class A shares for Class S shares and (ii) you are a Class S shareholder at the time of the requested exchange from Class A to Class S shares. Please note that a share exchange is a taxable event for federal income tax purposes. To be eligible for exchange, shares of a Fund must be registered in your name or in the name of your financial advisor for your benefit for at least 15 days. The minimum exchange amount to establish a new account is the same as the investment minimum for your initial purchase. Shares otherwise subject to a CDSC will not be charged a CDSC in an exchange. However, when you redeem the shares acquired through the exchange, the shares you redeem may be subject to a CDSC, depending upon when you originally purchased the shares you exchanged. For purposes of computing the CDSC, the length of time you have owned your shares will be measured from the date of original purchase and will not be affected by any exchange. Shares exchanged between Funds within 30 days of purchase may be subject to a 2.00% redemption fee, as described below under “Special Redemption and Exchange Information — Redemption Fee.”

Special Redemption and Exchange Information

Redemption Fee

Class A, Class C, Class I and Class S shares redeemed within 30 days of purchase, including redemptions in connection with an exchange, may be subject to a redemption fee of 2% of the redemption proceeds that will be deducted from those proceeds. The redemption fee is retained by the Fund from which you are redeeming shares (including redemptions by exchange), and is intended to

41

deter short-term trading and offset the trading costs, market impact and other costs associated with short-term trading in and out of the Funds and to facilitate portfolio management. The 2% fee directly affects the amount a shareholder who is subject to the fee receives upon exchange or redemption. The fee is not a deferred sales charge, is not a commission paid to NAM USA or the sub-advisors, and does not benefit NAM USA or its affiliates in any way. The Funds reserve the right to waive the 2% redemption fee on a case-by-case basis. The Funds reserve the right to modify the terms of or terminate this fee at any time.

The 2% redemption fee will not be charged on transactions involving the following:

• Total or partial redemptions of shares of a Fund held for 30 days or more;

• Total or partial redemptions of shares by omnibus accounts maintained by brokers that do not have the systematic capability to track and process the redemption fee;

• Total or partial redemptions of shares by approved fee-based programs that do not have the systematic capability to track and process the redemption fee or require waiver of redemption fees as a condition for inclusion in the program;

• Total or partial redemptions of shares invested through retirement plans maintained pursuant to Sections 401, 403, 408, 408A and 457 of the Internal Revenue Code (including 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, 457 plans, Keogh accounts, and Profit Sharing and Money Purchase Pension Plans) where the shares are held within omnibus accounts maintained by a retirement plan sponsor or record keeper that has a written agreement to provide data to assist the Funds in monitoring for excessive trading;

• Total or partial redemptions effectuated pursuant to an automatic non-discretionary rebalancing program or a systematic withdrawal plan set up in the Funds;

• Total or partial redemptions requested within 30 days following the death or post-purchase disability of (i) any registered shareholder on an account, or all registered shareholders of a Fund account with more than one registered shareholder, (i.e., joint tenant account), upon receipt by the Transfer Agent of appropriate written instructions and documentation satisfactory to the Transfer Agent or (ii) the settlor of a living trust which is the registered shareholder of an account, of shares held in the account at the time of death or initial determination of post-purchase disability;

• Total or partial redemptions of shares acquired though reinvestment of dividends or distributions;

• Total or partial redemptions of shares by registered management investment companies that have an agreement with NAM USA or the Distributor for that purpose;

• Redemptions initiated by a Fund (e.g., upon exercise of its right to liquidate accounts (i) falling below the minimum account size by reason of shareholder redemptions or (ii) when the shareholder has failed to provide tax identification information); or

• Total or partial redemptions by a Fund of its investment in another Fund made in connection with a rebalancing of its investments.

However, if shares are purchased for a retirement plan account through a broker, financial institution or recordkeeper maintaining an omnibus account for the shares, such waiver may not apply. (Before purchasing shares, please check with your account representative concerning the availability of the fee waiver.) In addition, this waiver does not apply to IRA and SEP-IRA accounts. In determining whether the minimum 30-day holding period has been met, only the period during which you have held shares of the Fund from which you are redeeming is counted. For this purpose and without regard to the shares actually redeemed, shares will be treated as redeemed as follows: first, reinvestment shares; second, purchased shares held 30 days or more; and third, purchased shares held for less than 30 days. Finally, if a redeeming shareholder acquires Fund shares through a transfer from another shareholder, applicability of the fee, if any, will be determined by reference to the date the shares were originally purchased, and not from the date of transfer between shareholders. The Funds reserve the right to modify the terms of or to eliminate any of these exceptions to the redemption fee at any time.

Redemptions by Telephone

Shareholders currently receive the right to redeem by telephone up to $100,000 to their address of record. In order to request redemptions by telephone, shareholders must have completed and returned to the Transfer Agent the application, including the designation of a bank account to which the redemption proceeds are to be sent.

(a) NEW INVESTORS who wish to establish telephone redemption to a predesignated bank account must complete the appropriate section on the application.

42

(b) EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS who wish to establish telephone redemption to a predesignated bank account or who want to change the bank account previously designated to receive redemption proceeds should either return an account application, including the designation of a bank account to which the redemption proceeds are to be sent (available upon request) or send a letter identifying the account and specifying the exact information to be changed. The letter must be signed exactly as the shareholder’s name(s) appears on the account. A signature and a signature guarantee are required for each person in whose name the account is registered.

Telephone redemption is not available with respect to shares represented by share certificates. This option is also not available for fiduciary accounts (i.e., IRA, Roth IRA, etc.).

If a request for redemption to a shareholder’s bank account is made by telephone or fax, payment will be made by Federal Reserve Bank wire to the bank account designated on the application, unless a request is made that the redemption check be mailed to the designated bank account.

Note: Investors designating a savings bank to receive their telephone redemption proceeds are advised that if the savings bank is not a participant in the Federal Reserve System, redemption proceeds must be wired through a commercial bank which is a correspondent of the savings bank. As this may delay receipt by the shareholder’s account, it is suggested that investors wishing to use a savings bank discuss wire procedures with their bank and submit any special wire transfer information with the telephone redemption authorization. If appropriate wire information is not supplied, redemption proceeds will be mailed to the designated bank.

The Funds employ procedures, including recording telephone calls, testing a caller’s identity, and sending written confirmation of telephone transactions, designed to give reasonable assurance that instructions communicated by telephone are genuine, and to discourage fraud. To the extent that a Fund does not follow such procedures, it may be liable for losses due to unauthorized or fraudulent telephone instructions. Each Fund will not be liable for acting upon instructions communicated by telephone that it reasonably believes to be genuine.

Redemption requests by telephone (technically a repurchase by agreement between a Fund and the shareholder) of shares purchased by check will not be accepted for fifteen (15) business days following their purchase.

Redemptions by Mail

In order to ensure proper authorization before redeeming shares, the Transfer Agent may request additional documents such as, but not restricted to, stock powers, trust instruments, certificates of death, appointments as executor, certificates of corporate authority and waivers of tax required in some states when settling estates.

It is suggested that shareholders holding shares registered in other than individual names contact the Funds’ Transfer Agent prior to redemptions to ensure that all necessary documents accompany the request. When shares are held in the name of a corporation, trust, fiduciary or partnership, the Transfer Agent requires, in addition to the stock power, certified evidence of authority to sign. These procedures are for the protection of shareholders and should be followed to ensure prompt payment. Redemption requests must not be conditional as to date or price of the redemption. Proceeds of a redemption will be sent within seven (7) business days after receipt of a request for redemption that complies with the above requirements. Delays of more than seven (7) days of payment for shares tendered for repurchase or redemption may result but only until the purchase check has cleared.

The requirements for IRA redemptions are different from those for regular accounts. For more information, call 1-800-535-2726.

Redemptions-in-Kind

In the event a Fund’s management determines that substantial distributions of cash would have an adverse effect on such Fund’s remaining shareholders, each Fund reserves the right to honor any request for redemption or repurchase order by making payment in whole or in part in readily marketable securities chosen by the Fund and valued as they are for purposes of computing such Fund’s NAV. Each Fund has elected, however, to be governed by Rule 18f-1 under the 1940 Act as a result of which each Fund is obligated to redeem shares, with respect to any one shareholder during any 90-day period, solely in cash up to the lesser of $250,000 or 1% of the net asset value of the applicable Fund at the beginning of the period. The tax consequences to a redeeming shareholder are the same whether the shareholder receives cash or securities in payment for his or her shares.

If redemption payment is made in portfolio securities, the redeeming shareholder may incur brokerage commissions and applicable taxes in converting those securities into cash. In addition, the conversion of securities into cash may expose the shareholder to stock market risk and currency exchange risk.

If a shareholder receives portfolio securities upon redemption of Fund shares, they may request that such securities either (1) be delivered to their designated agent, or (2) be liquidated on their behalf and the proceeds of such liquidation (net of any brokerage commissions, fees and applicable taxes) remitted to them.

43

Other Information

All redemption requests must be directed to the Transfer Agent. Redemption requests that are delivered to the Fund rather than to the Transfer Agent will be forwarded to the Transfer Agent, and processed at the next calculated NAV after receipt by the Transfer Agent.

Your purchase or redemption order will be calculated at the NAV next calculated, after the deduction of applicable sales charges and redemption fees and any required tax withholding, if your order is complete (has all required information) and the Transfer Agent receives your order by:

• the Transfer Agent’s close of business, if placed through a financial intermediary, so long as the financial intermediary (or its authorized designee) received your order by the valuation time; or

• the valuation time, if placed directly by you (not through a financial intermediary such as a broker or bank) to the Transfer Agent.

The value of shares redeemed or repurchased may be more or less than the shareholder’s cost depending on the NAV at the time of redemption or repurchase. Other than the 2% redemption fee described above, the Funds do not impose a redemption or repurchase charge. Redemption of shares may result in tax consequences (gain or loss) to the shareholder and the proceeds of such redemptions may be subject to backup withholding. (See “Taxes”).

Shareholders who wish to redeem shares from special plan accounts should contact the employer, trustee or custodian of the Plan for the requirements.

Distribution Options

Investors have freedom to choose whether to receive cash or to reinvest any dividends (whether from net investment income or from realized capital gains) in additional shares of the applicable Fund. A change of instructions for the method of payment must be received by the Transfer Agent in writing at least five days prior to a dividend record date. Shareholders may change their dividend option either by calling 1-800-535-2726 or by sending written instructions to the Transfer Agent. Please include your account number with your written request. See “Taxes.”

Reinvestment is usually made at the closing NAV determined on the business day following the record date. Investors may leave standing instructions with the Transfer Agent designating their option for either reinvestment or cash distribution of any income dividends or capital gains distributions. If no election is made, dividends and distributions will be invested in additional shares of the Fund. Investors who choose to reinvest dividends will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as if they had received such dividends and purchased additional shares.

Investors may also have dividends automatically deposited to their predesignated bank account. Investors choosing to participate in the Funds’ Systematic Withdrawal Plan must reinvest any dividends or capital gains. For most retirement plan accounts, the reinvestment of dividends is required.

Reports to Shareholders

The Corporation issues shareholders unaudited semi-annual financial statements and annual financial statements audited by the Funds’ registered independent public accounting firm, including a list of investments held and statements of assets and liabilities, operations, changes in net assets and financial highlights.

Transaction Summaries

Annual summaries of all transactions in each Fund account are available to shareholders. The summaries may be obtained by calling 1-800-535-2726.

Special Plan Accounts

Detailed information on the investment plans described below, including applicable charges, minimum investment requirements and disclosures made pursuant to Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) requirements, may be obtained by contacting Nomura Partners Funds, Inc., c/o Boston Financial Data Services, 30 Dan Road, Canton, MA 02021 or by calling toll free, 1-800-535-2726. The discussions of the plans below describe only certain aspects of the federal income tax treatment of the plan. The state tax treatment may be different and may vary from state to state. It is advisable for an investor considering the funding of the investment plans described below to consult with an attorney or other investment or tax advisor with respect to the suitability requirements and tax aspects thereof.

Shares of a Fund may also be a permitted investment under profit sharing and pension plans and IRAs depending on the provisions of the relevant plan or IRA.

44

None of the plans assures a profit or guarantees protection against depreciation, especially in declining markets.

Systematic Withdrawal Plan

Non-retirement plan shareholders with an Account Balance of at least $5,000 may establish a Systematic Withdrawal Plan to receive monthly, quarterly or periodic redemptions from his or her account for any designated amount of $100 or more. Shareholders may designate which day they want the automatic withdrawal to be processed. If no date is specified, the withdrawal will automatically occur on the fifteenth day of the month or, if such day in not a business day, on the prior business day and are paid promptly thereafter. Each payment under this systematic withdrawal is funded through the redemption of the shareholder’s Fund shares. The check amounts may be based on the redemption of a fixed dollar amount or fixed share amount. The Plan provides for income dividends and capital gains distributions, if any, to be reinvested in additional shares. Shares are then liquidated as necessary to provide for withdrawal payments. Since the withdrawals are in amounts selected by the investor and have no relationship to yield or income, payments received cannot be considered as yield or income on the investment and the resulting liquidations may deplete or possibly extinguish the initial investment, and any reinvested dividends and capital gains distributions. Requests for increases in withdrawal amounts or to change payee must be submitted in writing, signed exactly as the account is registered and contain medallion signature guarantee(s) as described under “How to Purchase, Exchange and Redeem Shares–Signature Guarantees” in the Prospectus. Any such requests must be received by the Transfer Agent 10 days prior to the date of the first systematic withdrawal. A Systematic Withdrawal Plan may be terminated at any time by the shareholder, the Corporation, or its agent on written notice, and will be terminated when all shares of the Funds under the Plan have been liquidated or upon receipt by the Corporation of notice of death of the shareholder.

A Systematic Withdrawal Plan request form can be obtained by calling 1-800-535-2726.

Automatic Investment Plan

Shareholders may arrange to make periodic investments through automatic deductions from their bank accounts by completing the appropriate form and providing the necessary documentation to establish this service. The minimum investment is $50.

The Automatic Investment Plan involves an investment strategy called dollar cost averaging. Dollar cost averaging is a method of investing whereby a specific dollar amount is invested at regular intervals. By investing the same dollar amount each period, when shares are priced low, the investor will purchase more shares than when the share price is higher. Over a period of time, this investment approach may allow the investor to reduce the average price of the shares purchased. However, this investment approach does not assure a profit or protect against loss. This type of regular investment program may be suitable for various investment goals such as, but not limited to, college planning or saving for a home. Shareholders may designate which day they want the automatic investment to be processed. If no date is specified, the investment will automatically occur on the fifteenth day of the month, or, if such day is not a business day, on the prior business day.

Uniform Transfers/Gifts to Minors Act

Grandparents, parents or other donors may set up custodian accounts for minors. The minimum initial investment is $1,000 unless the donor agrees to continue to make regular share purchases for the account through the Automatic Investment Plan. In this case, the minimum initial investment is $500.

The Fund reserves the right, after notice has been given to the shareholder and custodian, to redeem and close a shareholder’s account in the event that regular investments to the account cease before the $1,000 minimum is reached.

TAXES

The accompanying prospectus contains information about the U.S. federal income tax consequences of ownership of shares. Certain supplementary information is presented below. References below to “Funds” apply to the Funds described in the accompanying prospectus.

United States Federal Income Taxation

The following is a general discussion of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to the status of the Funds and to the tax treatment of distributions by the Funds to shareholders. This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code” for purposes of this section), Treasury Regulations, administrative rulings and judicial decisions as of the date hereof, all of which may change either retroactively or prospectively. This discussion applies to shareholders who hold shares as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. This discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to shareholders in light of their particular circumstances or to shareholders subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws (e.g., certain financial institutions, insurance companies, dealers in stock or securities, tax-exempt organizations, persons who have entered into hedging transactions with respect to shares of a Fund, persons who borrow in order to acquire shares, and certain foreign taxpayers).

45

Prospective shareholders should consult their tax advisors with respect to the particular tax consequences to them of an investment in a Fund.

Each Fund has elected to qualify and intends to continue to qualify for the special tax treatment applicable to “regulated investment companies” under Sections 851 through 855 of the Code. To so qualify, each Fund must, among other things: (a) derive at least 90% of its gross income in each taxable year from (i) dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock, securities or foreign currencies, or other income (including, but not limited to, gains from options, futures or forward contracts) derived with respect to its business of investing in such stock, securities or currencies, and (ii) net income derived from interests in “qualified publicly traded partnerships,” and (b) diversify its holdings so that, at the end of each quarter of the Fund’s taxable year, (i) at least 50% of the value of the Fund’s total assets is represented by cash and cash items, securities of other regulated investment companies, U.S. government securities and other securities, with such other securities limited, in respect of any one issuer, to an amount not greater than 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets and not greater than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer, and (ii) not more than 25% of the value of the Fund’s total assets is invested in the securities of any one issuer (other than U.S. government securities or securities of other regulated investment companies), in two or more issuers of the same industry that are controlled by the Fund, or in securities of one or more “qualified publicly traded partnerships.” Foreign currency gains will qualify for the gross income test described above only if such gains are derived with respect to the Fund’s business of investing in stock, securities or currencies. Each Fund anticipates that, in general, its foreign currency gains will be directly related to its principal business of investing in stock and securities.

For purposes of the asset diversification tests described above, it is not always clear what entity will be treated as the issuer of a derivative security. In particular, the India Fund, which may make substantial investments in derivative securities that reference Indian securities, will need to determine the issuer for this purpose. While each Fund generally intends to treat the issuers of the underlying reference securities as the issuers for purposes of the foregoing diversification tests (rather than the counterparty to the derivative contract), it is possible that the IRS, which has provided little guidance on this subject in the past, could issue contrary guidance or could reach a different conclusion with respect to a particular investment held by a Fund.

Qualification and election as a regulated investment company involve no supervision of investment policy or management by any government agency. As a regulated investment company, each Fund generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its net investment income and net long-term and short-term capital gains, if any, that it distributes (or is treated as distributing, as described below) to its shareholders, provided that at least 90% of its “investment company taxable income” (determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid) is distributed or deemed distributed in each of its taxable years. A Fund’s investment company taxable income for any taxable year does not include its net capital gain (which consists of the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss) for such taxable year. Assuming a Fund meets the 90% distribution requirement, it will generally be subject to tax at regular U.S. federal corporate income tax rates on any income or gain that is not distributed or deemed distributed.

Each Fund intends to distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income and net capital gain at least annually. In addition, each Fund intends to make sufficient distributions in a timely manner to ensure that it will not be subject to the nondeductible 4% U.S. federal excise tax on certain undistributed income of regulated investment companies. In general, in order to avoid the 4% U.S. federal excise tax, the Fund must distribute for each calendar year at least 98% of its ordinary income (computed on a calendar-year basis), plus 98% of its capital gain net income (generally computed for the one-year period ending on October 31). Despite each Fund’s intention to make sufficient distributions to satisfy the 90% and excise tax distribution requirements, its ability to do so may be limited by exchange control regulations imposed by countries in which it invests that may restrict repatriations of investment income and capital or the proceeds of securities sales by foreign investors such as the Fund, or by other factors.

If any net capital gain is retained by a Fund for reinvestment, requiring U.S. federal income taxes to be paid thereon by the Fund, the Fund will elect to treat such capital gains as having been distributed to shareholders. As a result, each shareholder will be required to include such capital gains in income as long-term capital gains, will be able to claim his or her share of U.S. federal income taxes paid by such Fund on such gains as a credit against his or her own U.S. federal income tax liability or as a refund, and will be entitled to increase the adjusted tax basis of his or her Fund shares by the difference between his or her share of such gains and the related credit or refund.

If for any taxable year a Fund does not qualify for the special federal income tax treatment afforded to regulated investment companies (for example, by not meeting the 90% distribution requirement described above), all of its taxable income will be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates (without any deduction for distributions to its shareholders). In such event, provided that a shareholder satisfied the applicable holding period and other requirements with respect to his or her shares, dividends received during a taxable year beginning before January 1, 2011 would be taxable to the shareholder as “qualified dividend income” to the extent of the Fund’s earnings and profits, and would be eligible for the dividends-received deduction in the case of a corporate shareholder.

46

Each Fund may invest in shares of certain foreign corporations that are classified under the Code as passive foreign investment companies (“PFICs”). In the absence of one of the elections described below, if a Fund receives certain distributions from a PFIC, or gain from the sale of PFIC stock, the Fund itself may be subject to a tax on such distributions or gain, as well as to interest charges. In order to mitigate these adverse consequences, each Fund generally intends to make an election to “mark to market” its shares of PFICs (i.e., generally treat them as if they were sold and repurchased at the end of each taxable year). At the end of each taxable year to which the election applies, each Fund will report as ordinary income the amount by which the fair market value of the PFIC’s stock exceeds the Fund’s adjusted basis in these shares. If the Fund’s adjusted basis in the shares of a PFIC exceeds the shares’ fair market value at the end of a taxable year, the Fund will be entitled to a deduction equal to the lesser of (a) this excess and (b) the Fund’s previous income inclusions in respect of such stock under the mark-to-market rules that have not previously been offset by such mark-to-market losses. As a result of a mark-to-market election, a Fund will not recognize any capital gains with respect to its investment in the relevant PFIC stock. Alternatively, each Fund may be able to elect to include annually, as income and gain, its share of the ordinary earnings and net capital gain of certain PFICs.

Certain investments made by a Fund, such as investments in debt securities that have original issue discount, will cause the Fund to recognize income for U.S. federal income tax purposes prior to the Fund’s receipt of the corresponding distributable proceeds. In addition, a Fund’s transactions in foreign currencies, forward contracts, options, and futures contracts (including options and futures contracts on foreign currencies) will be subject to special provisions of the Code that, among other things, may affect the character of gains and losses realized by the applicable Fund (i.e., may affect whether gains or losses are ordinary or capital), accelerate recognition of income to the Fund or defer Fund losses. These rules could therefore affect the character, amount and timing of distributions to shareholders. These provisions also will require each Fund to mark to market certain types of positions in its portfolio.

As a consequence of either of the PFIC election described above, or of being required to mark certain other positions to market, a Fund may recognize income without receiving cash with which to make distributions in amounts necessary to satisfy the distribution requirements for avoiding income and excise taxes. In that case, a Fund may have to dispose of securities and use the proceeds to make required distributions at a time when it would not otherwise make the investment judgment to take such action. Each Fund intends to monitor these investments and transactions and to make the appropriate tax elections and the appropriate entries in its books and records when it acquires any foreign currency, forward contract, option, futures contract or hedged investment and will generally attempt to mitigate any adverse effects of these rules in order to minimize or eliminate its tax liabilities and to prevent disqualification of such Fund as a regulated investment company.

As of September 30, 2009, The Japan Fund had capital loss carryforwards of $35,855,243 and the International Growth Equity Fund had capital loss carryforwards of $159,063. Such carryforwards may be applied against any net realized taxable capital gains of each succeeding year until the expiration date or until fully utilized, whichever occurs first. $21,637,801 of The Japan Fund’s capital loss carryforwards expire on September 30, 2010. The Japan Fund’s remaining $14,217,442 of capital loss carryforwards and the International Growth Equity Fund’s capital loss carryforwards expire on September 30, 2017. None of the other Funds currently has a capital loss carryforward. Any capital loss carryforward will first reduce the applicable Fund’s net short-term capital gain, which will reduce the Fund’s investment company taxable income, and reduce net capital gain thereafter. Any reduction in a Fund’s net capital gain will reduce the amount of a distribution that such Fund may designate as a capital gain dividend.

Distributions

Distributions to shareholders of a Fund’s net investment income (other than “qualified dividend income”) and distributions of net short-term capital gain will be taxable as ordinary income to shareholders. Distributions of each Fund’s net capital gain (designated as capital gain dividends by the Fund) will be taxable to shareholders as long-term capital gains, regardless of the length of time the shares have been held by a shareholder. Distributions in excess of a Fund’s current and accumulated earnings and profits will, as to each shareholder, be treated as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of the shareholder’s adjusted basis in his or her shares of the Fund, and as a capital gain thereafter. Distributions of “qualified dividend income” made or deemed made by a Fund in taxable years of the shareholders beginning before January 1, 2011, will be treated as “qualified dividend income,” received by the shareholder and will therefore be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the rates applicable to long-term capital gains, provided the shareholder is not a corporation and satisfies the applicable holding period and other requirements. Dividends received by a Fund from foreign corporations in certain jurisdictions (including Japan, China and India) generally will constitute “qualified dividend income” provided that the Fund satisfies applicable holding period and other requirements. Dividends received from foreign corporations in other foreign jurisdictions may not constitute “qualified dividend income” and may be treated as ordinary income. Capital gain dividends paid by a Fund are not eligible for the dividends-received deduction available to corporations. Ordinary income dividends received by domestic-corporate shareholders will be eligible for the dividends-received deduction only to the extent such dividends are derived from dividends from domestic corporations for which the Fund could have claimed a dividends received deduction if such a deduction were available to the Fund and only if the Fund designates such dividends as eligible for the dividends-received deductions.

47

All distributions of net investment income and net capital gain, whether received in cash or reinvested, must be reported by the shareholder on his or her U.S. federal income tax return. Shareholders electing to reinvest distributions in additional shares will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as receiving the relevant distributions and using them to purchase shares. Each Fund (other than Global Equity Income Fund) intends to distribute its net investment company taxable income and net capital gain, if any, in September of each year. Global Equity Income Fund intends to distribute all or a portion of its net investment company taxable income on a quarterly basis to shareholders, and will distribute its net capital gain, if any, annually. Any dividends or capital gains distributions declared in October, November or December with a record date in any such month and paid during the following January will be treated for federal tax purposes as if paid by the Fund and received by shareholders on December 31 of the calendar year declared.

Distributions by a Fund result in a reduction in the net asset value of such Fund’s shares. Should a distribution reduce the net asset value below a shareholder’s cost basis, such distribution could nevertheless be taxable to the shareholder as ordinary income or capital gain as described above, even though, from an investment standpoint, it may constitute a partial return of capital. In particular, investors should consider the tax implications of buying shares just prior to a distribution. Although the price of shares purchased at that time includes the amount of the forthcoming distribution, the distribution will nevertheless be taxable to the purchaser.

Sale or Redemption of Shares

A shareholder may recognize a taxable gain or loss if the shareholder sells or redeems his or her shares. An exchange of a Fund’s shares for shares of another Fund will generally be treated as a sale of the Fund’s shares. A shareholder will generally be subject to taxation based on the difference between his or her adjusted tax basis in the shares sold or redeemed and the value of the cash or other property (including securities distributed by the applicable Fund or shares of another Fund for which the redeemed shares are exchanged) received by him or her in payment therefor.

A shareholder who receives securities upon redeeming his or her shares will have a tax basis in such securities equal to their fair market value on the redemption date. A shareholder who subsequently sells any securities received pursuant to a redemption will recognize taxable gain or loss to the extent that the proceeds from such sale are greater or less than his or her tax basis in such securities.

Any gain or loss arising from the sale or redemption of shares will be treated as capital gain or loss and will generally be long-term capital gain or loss if the shareholder’s holding period for the shares is more than one year and short-term capital gain or loss if it is one year or less. In taxable years beginning before January 1, 2011, capital gains recognized by individuals and other non-corporate shareholders on a sale or redemption of shares will generally be taxed at the rate of 15% if the shareholder’s holding period for the shares is more than 12 months. Any loss realized on a sale or redemption will be disallowed to the extent the shares disposed of are replaced with substantially identical shares within a period beginning 30 days before and ending 30 days after the disposition of the shares (including shares received pursuant to the shareholder’s election to reinvest distributions in additional shares). In such a case, the basis of the shares acquired will be adjusted to reflect the disallowed loss. Any loss arising from the sale or redemption of shares for which the shareholder has a holding period of six months or less will be treated for U.S. federal tax purposes as a long-term capital loss to the extent of any capital gain dividends received or deemed received by the shareholder with respect to such shares. For purposes of determining a shareholder’s holding period for shares, the holding period is suspended for any periods during which the shareholder’s risk of loss is diminished as a result of holding one or more other positions in substantially similar or related property or through certain options or short sales.

A shareholder who recognizes a loss on a sale or other disposition of his or her shares will be required to report the sale or other disposition on IRS Form 8886 if the loss exceeds an applicable threshold amount (generally $2 million for individuals). Failure to comply with the reporting requirements gives rise to substantial penalties. Certain states, including New York, may also have similar disclosure requirements. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors to determine whether they are required to file IRS Form 8886 in connection with a sale or other disposition of shares.

Foreign Taxes

It is expected that certain income of the Funds will be subject to foreign withholding taxes and other taxes imposed by countries in which the Funds invest. If a Fund is liable for foreign income taxes, including such withholding taxes, such Fund may meet the requirements of the Code for “passing through” to its shareholders the foreign income taxes paid, but there can be no assurance that a Fund will be able to do so. Under the Code, if more than 50% of the value of a Fund’s total assets at the close of the taxable year consists of stock or securities of foreign corporations, such Fund may file an election with the Internal Revenue Service to “pass through” to the Fund’s shareholders the amount of foreign income taxes paid by the Fund. Pursuant to this election, a shareholder (a) will include in gross income (in addition to taxable dividends actually received) the shareholder’s pro rata share of the foreign income taxes paid by the Fund; (b) will treat the shareholder’s pro rata share of such foreign income taxes as having been paid by the

48

shareholder; and (c) may, subject to certain limitations, be entitled either to deduct the shareholder’s pro rata share of such foreign income taxes in computing the shareholder’s taxable income or to use it as a foreign tax credit against U.S. income taxes. Shortly after any year for which a Fund makes such a pass through election, the Fund will report to its shareholders, in writing, the amount per share of such foreign tax that must be included in each shareholder’s gross income and the amount which will be available for deduction or credit.

The Japan Fund, the Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund, the India Fund, the Greater China Fund, the International Growth Equity Fund and the International Equity Fund expect to be able to make this election, although no assurance can be given that they will be able to do so. The Global Equity Income Fund, the Global Emerging Markets Fund and the Global Alpha Equity Fund may also be able to make this election for certain taxable years. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the Global Equity Income Fund did not qualify to make the election to “pass through” to the Fund’s shareholders the amount of foreign income taxes paid by the Fund. All other Funds did qualify to make such an election for the 2009 fiscal year and elected to “pass through” the amount of foreign income taxes paid.

Generally, a credit for foreign income taxes is subject to the limitation that it may not exceed the shareholder’s U.S. tax liability (before the credit) attributable to the shareholder’s total foreign source taxable income. For this purpose, the shareholder may treat as income from foreign sources both the portion of dividends and distributions received from a Fund that is derived from the Fund’s foreign source income (e.g., dividends paid by foreign companies) and the shareholder’s proportionate share of foreign income taxes paid by the Fund. Each Fund’s gains and losses from the sale of securities, and currency gains and losses, will generally be treated as derived from U.S. sources. The limitation on the foreign tax credit is applied separately to foreign source “passive income,” including the portion of dividends received from a Fund that qualifies as foreign source income. Because of these limitations, a shareholder may be unable to claim a credit for the full amount of the shareholder’s proportionate share of the foreign income taxes paid by a Fund. A shareholder’s ability to claim a credit for foreign taxes paid by a Fund may also be limited by holding period requirements applicable to both the Fund’s investment in foreign securities and to the shareholder’s investment in shares of the Fund.

If a Fund fails to qualify to make the election or does not make the election, any foreign taxes paid or accrued will represent an expense to such Fund, which will reduce its net investment income. Absent this election, shareholders will not be able to claim either a credit or deduction for their pro rata shares of such taxes paid by the Fund, nor will shareholders be required to treat their pro rata shares of such taxes as amounts distributed to them.

Backup Withholding

Each Fund will be required to impose backup withholding at the rates specified in the Code on all taxable distributions payable to shareholders who fail to provide the Fund with their correct taxpayer identification number or to make required certifications, or who have been notified by the Internal Revenue Service that they are subject to backup withholding. Corporate shareholders and certain other shareholders specified in the Code are exempt from such backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld may be credited against a shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability.

Foreign Shareholders

For purposes of this discussion, a “foreign shareholder” is an investor that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is a non-resident alien individual, a foreign corporation or a foreign estate or trust. The discussion below does not apply to a foreign shareholder who is a nonresident alien individual and is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year. Such foreign shareholders should consult their tax advisors with respect to the particular tax consequences to them of an investment in the Fund. The discussion below also assumes that a foreign shareholder’s ownership of shares in a Fund is not effectively connected with a trade or business conducted by such foreign shareholder in the United States. Except as discussed below, a distribution of a Fund’s net investment income to a foreign shareholder will be subject to withholding tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. In order to obtain a reduced rate of withholding, a foreign shareholder must provide an Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN (or substitute form) certifying the shareholder’s entitlement to benefits under a treaty. Foreign shareholders may be subject to an increased U.S. federal income tax on their income resulting from a Fund’s election (described above) to pass through amounts of foreign taxes paid by such Fund.

In general, a foreign shareholder will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to distributions from a Fund of net capital gain (the excess of net long-term capital gain for the taxable year in excess of net short-term capital loss for that year) or amounts retained by a Fund that are designated as undistributed net capital gains. Distributions of short-term capital gains or “qualified interest income” by a Fund with respect to certain of its taxable years beginning before January 1, 2010 are also exempt from U.S. federal withholding tax. The House of Representatives passed a bill that, if enacted, would extend the withholding tax exemption on distributions of short-term capital gain dividends or “qualified interest income” to taxable years beginning before January 1, 2011. In general, a foreign shareholder will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to gain arising from the sale or redemption of shares of a Fund.

49

The tax consequences to a foreign shareholder entitled to claim the benefits of an applicable tax treaty may be different from those described herein. Foreign shareholders are advised to consult their own tax advisor with respect to the particular tax consequences to them of investment in a Fund.

Notices

Shareholders will be notified annually by each Fund in which they have invested of the U.S. federal income tax status of the dividends, distributions and deemed distributions made by the Fund to its shareholders. Furthermore, shareholders will also receive, if appropriate, various written notices after the close of the applicable Fund’s taxable year regarding the U.S. federal income tax status of certain dividends, distributions and deemed distributions that were paid (or that are treated as having been paid) by such Fund to its shareholders during the preceding taxable year.

State and Local Taxes

In addition to federal income taxes, shareholders of the Funds may be subject to state and local taxes on distributions from the Funds and on repurchases or redemptions of shares. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors as to the application of such taxes and as to the tax status of distributions from the Funds and repurchases or redemptions of shares in their own states and localities.

Japanese Taxation – The Japan Fund

The following is a general discussion of certain general information on Japanese income taxation relating to investments made by The Japan Fund in Japanese securities. The discussion below is based on current tax laws and regulations in Japan and current tax treaties executed by Japan all as in effect on the date hereof and all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect). The discussion below does not address all aspects of Japanese income taxation that may be relevant to The Japan Fund’s investments in Japan as contemplated herein.

The operations of The Japan Fund as described herein do not, in the opinion of Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu, Japanese counsel for the Corporation in relation to The Japan Fund, involve the creation in Japan of a “permanent establishment” of the Corporation or The Japan Fund by reason only of dealing in Japanese securities (whether or not such dealings are effected through securities firms or banks licensed in Japan), provided such dealings are conducted by The Japan Fund from outside of Japan or by The Japan Fund’s independent agent acting in the ordinary course of its business in Japan, pursuant to the Japanese tax laws and the tax convention between the United States and Japan (the “Convention”) as currently in force. Under Japanese tax laws, dividends (including distribution of profits) derived by a non-resident of Japan having no permanent establishment in Japan (a “non-resident Investor”) from shares of stocks issued by Japanese corporations (which generally include Japanese REITs) or from beneficiary certificates representing the beneficiary interests in Japanese Exchange Traded Funds (which generally take the form of a trust under Japanese law, and whose beneficiary certificates are publicly offered) (“ETFs”) are generally subject to Japanese withholding tax, and the rate of such withholding tax is 20% in principle; however, with respect to dividends paid to shareholders of stocks issued by Japanese corporations that are listed on any of the securities exchanges or traded in the over-the-counter market (except for any individual shareholder of such stock, resident or non-resident, holding 5% or more of the total issued shares of the issuer corporation) and distribution of profits made to holders of beneficiary certificates of ETFs, the withholding tax rate is reduced to 7% (with respect to any dividends which become due and payable on or before December 31, 2011) and 15% (with respect to any dividends which become due and payable thereafter). Further, under Japanese tax laws, interest paid to a non-resident Investor from debt securities issued by Japanese issuers is generally subject to Japanese withholding tax at the rate of 15%. Exemptions from the withholding tax may be available for certain interest paid on interest-bearing corporate bonds issued outside of Japan and payable outside of Japan, as well as on Japanese government bonds, if such interest is received by an investor who is a non-resident Investor subject to satisfaction of certain requirements. Under the Convention, (i) the rate of Japanese withholding tax which may be imposed on dividends to be paid on stocks issued by a Japanese corporation or beneficiary certificates of ETFs to a U.S. resident having no permanent establishment in Japan who is entitled to the full benefits thereunder (an “Eligible U.S. Holder”) and who holds such stocks as portfolio investor or who holds such beneficiary certificates is generally reduced to 10%, and (ii) the rate of Japanese withholding tax that may be imposed on interest sourced from Japan and received by an Eligible U.S. Holder is generally reduced to 10%. So long as the Corporation is an Eligible U.S. Holder, it may claim the application of such treaty rates provided under the Convention by timely filing appropriate treaty benefit claim forms with the Japanese tax authorities when the above-mentioned Japanese withholding tax rate provided under Japanese tax law for either dividends or interest exceeds any such treaty rate.

Capital gains earned by an Eligible U.S. Holder from disposition of securities issued by Japanese issuers will not generally be subject to Japanese income tax. However, an Eligible U.S. Holder may under certain circumstances be subject to Japanese income tax with respect to capital gains arising from the disposition of shares of certain “real property holding corporations.” For purposes of this paragraph, a real property holding corporation generally includes both Japanese and non-Japanese corporations, 50% or more of whose assets consist of real properties situated within Japan, or certain other assets similar thereto. In general, Japanese REITs constitute real property holding corporations.

50

Indian Taxation – The India Fund

The following is a general discussion of the tax consequences of investments made by the India Fund in Indian securities as contemplated herein. The discussion below is based on current tax laws in India as in effect on the date hereof and which are subject to change or differing interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect). The taxation of the India Fund in India is governed by the provisions of the Indian Income Tax Act (“ITA”). The Finance Act amends the ITA every year. The Indian tax rates mentioned in this section are the rates currently in force for the Financial Year 2009-10. The discussion below does not address all aspects of Indian income taxation that may be relevant to the India Fund’s investments in India as contemplated herein.

The India Fund does not expect to be deemed a resident of India for Indian income tax purposes. A non-resident investor, such as the India Fund, will be subject to Indian taxation on certain types of Indian source income or income accrued or received (whether deemed or otherwise) in India. It is expected that most of the income of the India Fund will constitute Indian source income.

Pursuant to Indian income tax provisions, income arising from a transaction entered into outside India between two non-residents should not be taxable in India unless the income is regarded as that arising from any business connection in India, through any property in India, from any asset or source of income in India or through the transfer of a capital asset situated in India, or if the income is received or deemed to be received in India. Consequently, income of the India Fund arising from the sale of participatory notes (“P-Notes”) with underlying Indian securities should not be subject to tax in India given that the situs of the P-Notes is outside of India and they are consequently not property or capital assets situated in India. However, in the case of a leading telecom transaction, the Indian tax authorities have sought to tax profits earned outside India on the transfer of shares of a foreign company by one non-resident to another on the basis that the transaction involved transfer of the controlling interest and management rights in an Indian company and that the same was taxable in India. The tax authorities also contended that the acquirer of the shares was required to withhold tax before making payments to the transferor and issued a show-cause notice to the acquirer as to why it should not be held to be an assessee in default for failing to withholding tax at the source. The acquirer disputed its liability to withhold tax at the source and filed a writ petition to the Bombay High Court against the show cause notice. The High Court, while dismissing the writ petition, also observed that the transfer of a controlling interest in an Indian company was liable for tax in India. It is likely that the decision will be appealed to the Indian Supreme Court. The possibility of Indian tax authorities seeking to tax gains arising from the transfer of P-Notes held by the India Fund with underlying Indian securities on the basis that it merely represents an interest in underlying Indian securities cannot be ruled out.

If the India Fund were deemed to have a permanent establishment in India under the ITA, then the India Fund’s business income would be subject to taxation in India at the rate of 42.23% (inclusive of surcharge and education cess) on a net income basis. The India Fund intends to organize its affairs in a manner so as not to create a permanent establishment in India.

Dividend income earned by the India Fund will not be subject to Indian tax. However, the Indian company declaring and paying such dividend would be subject to a Dividend Distribution Tax (“DDT”) at an effective rate of 16.995% (inclusive of surcharge and education cess) on the amount of the dividend paid out.

Interest paid to the India Fund in respect of debt obligations of Indian issuers will be subject to Indian income tax. The tax rate in the case of a rupee-denominated debt obligation is 42.23% (inclusive of surcharge and education cess). In the case of a foreign-currency denominated debt obligation, the tax rate is 21.115% (inclusive of surcharge and education cess).

Transactions involving the purchase or sale of shares or any other security traded on a recognized Indian stock exchange are subject to Securities Transaction Tax (“STT”) at the rate of 0.125% on the transaction value of the purchase or sale. This STT is not applicable to primary issuances of equity shares by a company or to off-market transactions. Hence, STT will be payable if the India Fund buys or sells listed securities on a recognized Indian stock exchange.

Under certain circumstances, capital gains tax will be imposed on gains that the India Fund derives from the sale or disposition of shares of Indian companies. Except as described below, capital gains arising from the sale of shares held for more than 12 months (“long-term capital gains”) will generally be taxed at the rate of 21.115% (inclusive of surcharge and education cess) if such shares are not listed. No capital gains tax will apply in case of long-term capital gains derived from the sale or transfer of listed shares if the sale or transfer transaction is entered into on a recognized Indian stock exchange and subject to STT. Long-term capital gains arising from the sale of listed shares other than on a recognized stock exchange will be taxed at 10.56% (inclusive of surcharge and education cess). Except as described below, capital gains arising from the sale of shares held for 12 months or less (“short-term capital gains”) will be taxed at the rate of 42.23% (inclusive of surcharge and education cess) if such shares are not listed. Short-term capital gains arising from the sale of listed shares will be taxed at the rate of 15.836% (inclusive of surcharge and education cess) if the sale transaction is entered into on a recognized Indian stock exchange and subject to STT. Short-term capital gains arising from the sale of listed shares other than on a recognized stock exchange will be taxed at a rate of 31.672% (inclusive of surcharge and education cess).

51

Capital gains arising from the alienation of shares in an Indian company will be computed by (i) converting (at the date of alienation) the consideration received from alienation into the foreign currency that was used for the purchase of shares and (ii) subtracting from this amount the cost of acquisition of the shares (including expenses) determined in such foreign currency as of the date of purchase. The gains computed as aforesaid will be converted into Indian rupees (on the date of accrual of gains) for the purpose of determining the amount of capital gains tax payable, effectively permitting the seller to pay a lower amount as tax or requiring the seller to pay a higher amount of tax, as the case may be, depending on the exchange rate fluctuation.

If Indian tax is payable by the India Fund under the provisions of the ITA, a purchaser of shares from the India Fund may be required to withhold the amount of tax payable (at source) in relation to the transaction. However, NAM Singapore, the India Fund’s sub-advisor, is registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India as a Foreign Institutional Investor and, provided that the India Fund’s sub-advisor remains a Foreign Institutional Investor, a purchaser of shares from the India Fund will not be required to withhold tax from the purchase price under the current provisions of the ITA.

Direct Taxes Code. The Finance Minister of India, on August 12, 2009, released a draft of the Direct Taxes Code, 2009 (the “DTC”) for public comments. The proposed DTC will replace the ITA upon its enactment. Some of the key provisions of the DTC are as highlighted below:

i A company will be considered resident in India in any financial year if its place of control and management, at any time in the year, is situated wholly, or partly, in India. Therefore a foreign company will be treated as ‘resident’ of India (and thereby subject to Indian tax) even if the place of their control and management is situated ‘partly’ in India.

ii The scope of taxable income has been widened to include ‘indirect’ transfer of any capital asset situated in India. The tax authorities can apply this provision in order to tax offshore transactions which involve indirect sale of business/assets situated in India, including P-Notes (as described above).

iii It is proposed that all capital gains (whether long term or short term) will be taxable at a uniform rate of 30% under the DTC, with the STT regime (as described above) being abolished altogether.

iv The DTC contains treaty override provisions, whereby the benefits of a double taxation avoidance treaty can be denied, if the DTC is the newer provision of law (as compared to such treaty). Further, Indian tax authorities will have the power to declare any arrangement as an ‘impermissible avoidance arrangement’ if it believes that an arrangement (or part thereof) lacks commercial substance and has been entered into to obtain a tax benefit.

It is expected that the DTC will come into effect from April 2011. It must be noted that the DTC is currently only a draft and it is unclear whether the provisions (including the above) will be finalized and promulgated in its current form. However, given the approach of the Indian tax authorities in recent cases (including the one described above) and the proposed DTC, the possibility of incremental Indian taxation cannot be entirely ruled out.

PRC, Hong Kong and Taiwan Taxation – the Greater China Fund

PRC Tax Considerations

The following is a general discussion of the tax consequences of investments made by the Greater China Fund in securities issued by companies organized in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) as contemplated herein. The discussion below is based on the current tax laws and regulations in the PRC and current tax treaties executed by the PRC, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive effect). The discussion below does not address all aspects of the PRC income taxation that may be relevant to the Greater China Fund’s investments in the PRC as contemplated herein.

Corporate Income Tax (“CIT”)

The National People’s Congress approved the Corporate Income Tax Law of the People’s Republic of China (“CIT Law”) on March 16, 2007, and the CIT Law took effect on January 1, 2008. The CIT Law applies to resident and non-resident enterprises and sets out the principles for determining an enterprise’s liability for CIT. Detailed Implementation Rules set out the method of calculating taxable income. The general applicable CIT rate in the PRC is 25%.

Non-resident enterprises without an establishment or place of business in the PRC are subject to withholding tax at the standard rate of 20% on various types of passive income (including dividends, interest, and capital gains on disposal of PRC equity interests) derived from the PRC. The CIT Law contains a specific provision allowing the State Council to exempt or reduce the withholding tax rate for particular types of income. The standard withholding tax rate has been reduced by the State Council to 10% pursuant to Article 91 of the Detailed Implementation Rules to the CIT Law.

PRC listed equity securities include “onshore” and “offshore” listed Chinese shares. PRC onshore listed shares consist of “A” shares and “B” shares. “A” shares are shares issued by PRC incorporated companies, which are denominated in Chinese currency (“RMB”), and are listed and traded on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges. Under current PRC laws, foreign investors, including the Greater China Fund, cannot invest directly in “A” shares. Accordingly, the Greater China Fund will have to invest in “A” shares through a foreign company holding a Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (“QFII”) license. In this regard, any tax assessed under PRC tax laws against the QFII would likely be borne by the Greater China Fund under the investment agreement with the QFII. “B” shares are foreign-invested shares issued by PRC incorporated companies, and are listed and traded in foreign currency on the

52

Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges. Foreign investors may invest directly in “B” shares. The PRC offshore listed shares include “H” shares and “Red-chips.” “H” shares are shares issued by PRC incorporated companies, which are denominated in Hong Kong Dollars and are listed and traded on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. “Red-chips” are shares of an offshore company listed and traded on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, controlled by mainland Chinese shareholders with operations carried out substantively in the PRC.

The Chinese QFII regime became effective on December 1, 2002. The scheme allows QFIIs to invest directly in Chinese currency “RMB” denominated stocks and securities listed and traded on PRC domestic capital markets. With the introduction of the CIT Law that took effect from January 1, 2008, the tax treatment of QFIIs should be governed by the general taxing provisions of the CIT Law, supplemented by tax circulars issued subsequently specifying tax rules applicable to QFIIs. Under the general taxing provisions of the CIT Law, QFIIs should be subject to PRC income withholding tax at the rate of 10% on dividends, interest and capital gains derived from investing in PRC listed securities, provided that the QFIIs are not considered to be PRC resident enterprises by reason of having a place of effective management in the PRC, or otherwise as having a permanent establishment in the PRC. In this regard, the Greater China Fund will seek to engage a licensed QFII to execute its investments in PRC listed “A” shares and that each QFII through which the Greater China Fund invests in “A” shares will manage its business such that it will not be considered to be a PRC tax resident enterprise or non-PRC tax resident enterprise that has a permanent establishment in the PRC.

It is expected that the Greater China Fund will operate and be managed in such a manner that it will not be treated as a tax resident enterprise of the PRC and also will not be treated as a non-tax resident enterprise with an establishment or place of business in the PRC for CIT purposes. As a consequence, the Greater China Fund will not be subject to CIT, but will be subject to 10% PRC withholding tax on PRC source investment income, including interest, as well as dividends derived from, and capital gains realized on the sale of, “A” shares (as described above, such tax will be assessed against the QFII, but borne by the Greater China Fund), “B” shares and “H” shares (except as provided below). This 10% withholding tax rate may be further reduced under an applicable tax treaty which the PRC has entered into with the jurisdiction in which the beneficial owner of the relevant income is resident. However, this rate is not reduced under the tax treaty between the PRC and the United States for U.S. residents, such as the Greater China Fund. On this basis, except as described below, the 10% withholding tax rate would likely be applicable in respect of the Greater China Fund’s PRC source income.

Under the current general provisions of the CIT Law, the source of dividend income and capital gains derived by the Greater China Fund from investing in shares of “Red-chip” companies may depend on whether the “Red-chip” companies, as offshore incorporated companies, would be treated as PRC tax resident enterprises under the CIT Law due to their place of effective management being considered to be in the PRC. In this regard, the State Administration of Taxation issued a tax notice, Guo Shui Fa [2009] No. 82 (“Notice 82”) on April 22, 2009 that took retrospective effect from January 1, 2008, which clarifies the recognition criteria on what constitute a “place of effective management” for overseas incorporated domestically-controlled enterprises (“OIDCE”) that would be relevant for the determination of PRC residency status under the CIT Law.

Where a “Red-chip” company falls within the recognition criteria under Notice 82, resulting in its place of effective management being considered to be in the PRC (and thus is considered a PRC tax resident enterprise), any dividend income paid from the “Red-chip” companies or gains on disposal of “Red-chips” would be technically considered to be PRC source income and subject to withholding tax when paid to a non PRC resident corporate shareholder. However, although the 10% withholding tax has been enforced on dividends paid on “Red-chips” and “H” shares, it has not been enforced with respect to capital gains derived by non-resident enterprises on acquisition and disposition of “Red-chips” and “H” shares traded on open stock exchanges.

To date, only certain listed “Red-chip” companies have made public announcements that they are PRC tax resident enterprises due to the application of Notice 82 (e.g. China Mobile Ltd, CNOOC Ltd and China Unicom which have commenced to withhold tax on dividend paid to foreign investors). Further, the PRC tax residency status of many other “Red-chip” companies is currently unclear (as this would require an assessment of place of such companies’ effective management) and they have not made announcements to date.

In any event, if the “Red-chip” companies are not treated as PRC tax resident enterprises, any dividends received by, or capital gains realized by, the Greater China Fund on disposal of “Red chips” should not be considered PRC source income and therefore should not be subject to 10% PRC withholding tax.

PRC Business Tax (“BT”) and Stamp Duty

As the Greater China Fund is not a financial institution established in the PRC, BT should not apply to the Greater China Fund in respect of capital gains derived from sale of PRC listed securities.

Under PRC laws and regulations, there is no BT on dividend income or profit distributions on equity investment derived by foreign investors, such as the Greater China Fund. In addition, under Cai Shui [2002] No. 191, the transfer of unlisted equity interest is also exempt from BT. However, BT would likely apply at the rate of 5% on any gross amount of PRC sourced interest income derived by the Greater China Fund.

53

The purchase and disposal of PRC listed shares will attract stamp duty at the rate of 0.1% (effective April 24, 2008) to be payable by each of the purchaser and seller. From September 19, 2008 onwards, only the seller will be liable for stamp duty on the sale of PRC listed shares, and the buyer will not be liable for stamp duty on the purchase of Chinese listed stocks. The purchase and disposal of PRC unlisted equity investments will attract stamp duty at the rate of 0.05% on the transaction value, which will be payable by each of the buyer and the seller.

Hong Kong Tax Considerations

Hong Kong profits tax is chargeable to persons who carry on business in Hong Kong on their Hong Kong sourced profits. The current profits tax rate is 16.5%. It is likely that the Greater China Fund may be treated as carrying on business in Hong Kong through appointment of and the actions of its sub-advisor, NAM Hong Kong. If the Greater China Fund is treated as carrying on business in Hong Kong, and if it has Hong Kong sourced profits, it will be subject to Hong Kong profits tax. The source of profits of the Greater China Fund depends on the nature of the investment.

As a general rule, profits from trading in listed securities are sourced at the location of the stock exchange where the securities are listed. For unlisted securities, the source is generally determined by reference to the place where the contracts of purchase and sale were effected.

Interest arising or derived by the Greater China Fund from outside Hong Kong and interest on bank deposits in Hong Kong, whether or not sourced in Hong Kong, should generally not be subject to Hong Kong profits tax. Dividends or capital gains (as opposed to trading gains), whether or not sourced in Hong Kong, should also generally not be subject to Hong Kong profits tax. However, it is likely that the Greater China Fund will be regarded as a trader and that, except as described below, gains from trading stocks will be subject to profits tax.

Certain non-residents, such as the Greater China Fund, may be exempted from Hong Kong profits tax with respect to Hong Kong sourced profits arising from transactions carried out through or arranged by a specified person where those profits are derived from (i) certain specified transactions (“specified transactions”); and (ii) transactions incidental to the carrying out of the specified transactions (“incidental transactions”). Such “specified transactions” include transactions in certain securities (including certain equity, debt and derivative instruments), foreign exchange contracts, futures contracts, exchange-traded commodities and the making of deposits other than by way of a money-lending business, except transactions in equities in private companies which are specifically excluded from this exemption. A “specified person” is defined to include a corporation licensed under Part V of the Securities and Futures Ordinance to carry on a business in certain regulated activities. NAM Hong Kong is licensed under Part V of the Securities and Futures Ordinance. As a result, the Greater China Fund intends to take the position that it is exempt from Hong Kong profits tax on Hong Kong sourced profits from specified transactions and incidental transactions.

The exemption provisions will not apply, however, if the Greater China Fund undertakes any transaction from its trade or business carried on in Hong Kong (i.e., through NAM Hong Kong) other than specified or incidental transactions. Furthermore, if the Greater China Fund undertakes only specified and incidental transactions, but the receipts from incidental transactions exceed 5% of the total receipts from both specified and incidental transactions, the exemption provisions will not apply in respect of any of the incidental profits.

Stamp duty will also apply to the Greater China Fund when it buys or sells Hong Kong stocks, either listed or unlisted securities of Hong Kong companies. Stamp duty of 0.1% of the amount of the consideration or of market value (whichever is higher) on every sold note and every bought note is imposed. Both the seller and the buyer have to pay 0.1% stamp duty, making it 0.2% in total for the transaction.

Taiwan Tax Considerations

Under current law, the Greater China Fund will not be subject to any Taiwan income tax on capital gains realized on listed or unlisted securities in Taiwan. Dividends received by the Greater China Fund from investments in Taiwan companies will be subject to Taiwan withholding tax at a rate of 20%. Interest earned during the Greater China Fund’s holding period of bonds issued by Taiwan companies will be subject to Taiwan withholding tax at a rate of 15%. The disposition of listed or unlisted shares in Taiwan will be subject to a 0.3% securities transaction tax.

NET ASSET VALUE

The net asset value of shares of each Fund is computed as of the close of regular trading on the NYSE on each day the NYSE is open for trading (the “Value Time”). The NYSE is scheduled to be closed on the following holidays: New Year’s Day, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, Presidents’ Day, Good Friday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas, and on the preceding Friday or subsequent Monday when one of these holidays falls on a Saturday or Sunday, respectively. Net asset value per share is determined separately for each class of shares by dividing the value of the total assets of a Fund attributable to the shares of

54

that class, less all liabilities attributable to that class, by the total number of shares of that class outstanding. The per share net asset value (“NAV”) may be lower for certain classes of a Fund because of higher expenses borne by these classes.

A security listed on a securities exchange, market or automated quotation system for which quotations are readily available, including securities traded over the counter, is valued at its most recent sale price on the relevant exchange as of the Value Time (for securities issued by United States companies), or, if there is no such reported sale on the valuation date, at the most recent quoted bid price. If such prices are not available, the security issued by a United States company will be valued in accordance with fair value methods approved by the Board.

A Fund values its assets of securities issued by non-U.S. companies each day pursuant to fair value methods approved by the by the Board. The Board has adopted valuation procedures for the Funds and has delegated day to day responsibility for fair value determinations to the Corporation’s Fair Value Committee. Fair value determinations that affect a Fund’s net asset value are subject to review, approval or ratification by the Board. The valuation procedures include a procedure whereby securities prices may be “fair valued” by an independent pricing service approved by the Board. The Funds use fair value pricing to seek to ensure that each Fund’s net asset value reflects the value of its underlying portfolio securities.

Debt securities are valued as follows: If available, debt securities are priced based upon valuations provided by independent, third-party pricing agents. Such values generally reflect the last reported sales price if the security is actively traded. The third-party pricing agents may also value debt securities at an evaluated bid price by employing methodologies that utilize actual market transactions, broker-supplied valuations, or other methodologies designed to identify the market value for such securities. Such methodologies generally consider such factors as security prices, yields, maturities, call features, ratings and developments relating to specific securities in arriving at valuations. On the first day a new debt security purchase is recorded, if a price is not available on the automated pricing feeds from the Fund’s primary and secondary pricing vendors nor is it available from an independent broker, the security may be valued at its purchase price. Each day thereafter, the debt security will be valued according to the Funds’ Fair Value Procedures until an independent source can be secured. Debt obligations with remaining maturities of sixty days or less may be valued at their amortized cost, which approximates market value. If such prices are not available, the security will be valued by an independent broker or pursuant to the Fair Value Procedures, as applicable.

Options are valued at the last quoted sales price. If there is no such reported sale on the valuation date, long positions are valued at the most recent bid price, and short positions are valued at the most recent ask price.

Futures are valued at the settlement price established each day by the board of exchange on which they are traded. The daily settlement prices for financial futures are provided by an independent source.

Foreign currency forward contracts are valued at the current day’s interpolated foreign exchange rate, as calculated using the current day’s spot rate, and the thirty, sixty, ninety and one-hundred eighty day forward rates provided by an independent source.

Following the valuations of securities or other portfolio assets in terms of the currency in which the market quotation used is expressed (“Local Currency”), the value of these portfolio assets in terms of U.S. Dollars is calculated by converting the Local Currency into U.S. Dollars at the prevailing currency exchange rate on the valuation date.

Redeemable securities issued by open-end investment companies are valued at the investment company’s applicable net asset value, with the exception of exchange-traded open-end investment companies which are priced as equity securities as described above.

If market quotations, official closing prices, or information furnished by a pricing service are not readily available or do not accurately reflect fair value for a security or if a security’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded, including, but not limited to, when (i) the security’s trading has been halted or suspended, (ii) the security has been de-listed from a national exchange, (iii) the security’s primary trading market is temporarily closed at a time when under normal conditions it would be open, (iv) the security has not been traded for an extended period of time, (v) the security’s primary pricing source is not able or willing to provide a price, (vi) trading of the security is subject to local government-imposed restrictions and (vii) a significant event with respect to a security or securities has occurred after the close of the market or exchange on which the security or securities principally trades and before the time the Fund calculates net asset value, that security will be valued by another method that the Board believes accurately reflects fair value in accordance with the Board’s fair value pricing policies. These events may create arbitrage opportunities that may enable short-term traders to dilute the NAV of long-term investors.

There can be no assurance, however, that a fair value used by the Funds on any given day will more accurately reflect the market value of a security or securities than the market price of such security or securities. A security’s valuation may differ depending on the method used for determining value. Fair valuation of a Fund’s portfolio securities can serve to reduce arbitrage opportunities available to short term traders, but there is no assurance that fair value pricing policies will prevent dilution of a Fund’s NAV by short term traders.

55

Accrual for Capital Gains Tax in India. The Funds, including the India Fund, may be subject to capital gains tax in India on gains realized upon the disposition of Indian securities. The tax is computed on net realized gains; any realized losses in excess of gains may, subject to certain conditions, be carried forward for a period of up to eight years to offset future gains. Any net taxes payable must be remitted to the Indian government prior to repatriation of sales proceeds. If the Funds, including the India Fund, accrue a deferred tax liability for net unrealized gains in excess of available carryforwards on Indian securities, such accrual may reduce a Fund’s net asset value.

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF THE FUND

Set forth below are the names, ages, positions with the Corporation, length of term of office, principal occupations for the last five years, and any other directorships held of each of the persons currently serving as Directors or officers of the Corporation. The term of office for each Director is until the next meeting of stockholders called for the purpose of electing Directors and until the election and qualification of a successor, or until such Director sooner dies, resigns or is removed as provided in the governing documents of the Corporation. Because the Corporation does not hold an annual meeting of stockholders, each Director will hold office for an indeterminate period until retirement. The Board of the Corporation consists of eight individuals, six of whom are not “interested persons” of the Corporation as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Directors”).

The following lists Directors as of April 30, 2010.

Interested Directors

Name, Address* and Age	Position(s) Held with  the Fund	Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	No. of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen	Other Public Directorships Held
William L. Givens (80)**	Director	Director, 1978 to present; Chairman of the Board, 2000 to 2010; Chief Executive Officer, 2007 to April 2010	President, Twain Associates (management consulting), 1978 to present.	9	None

* The address of each Director is Nomura Partners Funds, Inc., c/o State Street Bank and Trust Company, 4 Copley Place, 5th Floor, Boston, MA 02116.

** William L. Givens is treated as an “interested director” because he served as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation.

56

Independent Directors

Name, Address* and Age	Position(s) Held with the Fund	Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	No. of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen	Other Public Directorships Held
J. Douglas Azar (63)	Director and Chairman of the Board	Director 2005 to present; Vice Chairman 2008 to 2010; Chairman 2010	Retired, October 2000 to present; CEO of US Retail Financial Services Operations, ING (Amsterdam, Holland), April 2000 to October 2000; prior to his tenure at ING, Mr. Azar was employed in various capacities at American International Group from 1993 through 2000, the last of which was Regional Vice President of AIG Life Insurance Operations (Tokyo, Japan), from 1996 to April 2000; Executive VP of US and Canadian Insurance Operations, North American Life Assurance Co. (Toronto, Canada), 1991 to 1993; from 1970 through 1991, Mr. Azar was employed by Aetna Life and Casualty Company serving in numerous positions, the last one of which was Vice President of Life Insurance Marketing (Hartford, CT).	9	Meritage, Inc. (machine tool distribution)

57

Name, Address* and Age	Position(s) Held with  the Fund	Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	No. of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen	Other Public Directorships Held
Lynn S. Birdsong (63)	Director	Director 2003 to present	Private Investor; Director, The Hartford Funds, May 2003 to present; Trustee, The Natural History Museum of the Adirondacks, December 2006 to present; Director, Berkshire Farm for Youth (social services), June 2003 to present; Trustee, The First Church of Christ, Scientist, Boston Pension Trust and Gift and Endowment Trust, June 2006 to present; Partner, George Birdsong Co. (advertising), January 1981 to present; Director, The Daycroft School Foundation, 2005 to October 2007; Director, The Atlantic Whitehall Funds, resigned 2005; Managing Director, Zurich Scudder Investments (asset management), January 1979 to April 2002.	9	The Natural History Museum of the Adirondacks; Berkshire Farm for Youth (social services); The Hartford Funds

58

Name, Address* and Age	Position(s) Held with  the Fund	Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	No. of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen	Other Public Directorships Held
James A. Firestone (55)	Director	Director July 2005 to present	President, Corporate Operations and Executive Vice President, Xerox Corporation (printing and imaging), August 2008 to present; President, Xerox North America and Senior Vice President, Xerox Corporation, October 2004 to August 2008; President Corporate Operations and Senior Vice President, Xerox Corporation, 2002 to 2004; Director, Fuji Xerox Corp, Ltd., October 2002 to 2004 and January 2009 to present.	9	Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc.; Yale University Center of Customer Insights
Takeshi Isayama (66)	Director	Director January 2005 to present	Director, Renault S.A.S. (auto manufacturing), May 2009 to present; Chairman, The Carlyle Japan LLP, October 2007 to present; Director, Dainippon Screen Mfg Co., Ltd. (semiconductor equipment manufacturing), June 2007 to present; Director, Terumo Corp. (medical equipment manufacturing), June 2006 to present; Director, The SEIYU, Ltd. (retail), March 2007 to December 2007; Vice Chairman, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., September 2001 to March 2007.	9	The Carlyle Japan LLP; Dainippon Screen Mfg Co., Ltd. (semiconductor equipment manufacturing); Terumo Corp. (medical equipment manufacturing)

59

Name, Address* and Age	Position(s) Held with  the Fund	Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	No. of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen	Other Public Directorships Held
Yoshihiko Miyauchi (74)	Director	Director July 1996 to present	Director, Sojitz Corporation, June 2005 to present; Director, Sony Corporation, June 2003 to present; Director, Showa Shell Sekiyu K.K., March 2003 to present; Director, Yasuda EMP Limited, February 2001 to present; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, ORIX Corporation (financial services), April 2000 to present; Director, ORIX Capital Markets, LLC, April 1997 to present; Director, Nippon Venture Capital Co., Ltd., February 1996 to present; Director, Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited, March 1993 to present; Representative Director, ORIX Baseball Club Co., Ltd., November 1988 to present; Director, ORIX USA Corporation and Subsidiaries, August 1981 to present; Director, ORIX Commercial Alliance Corporation, August 1968 to 2008; Director, DAIKYO Incorporated, March 2005 to 2007; Director, Mercian Corporation, March 2001 to 2005; Director, AOZORA Bank, Ltd., September 2000 to 2007; Director, Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd., March 1999 to 2006; Director, ORIX Hawaii, Inc., April 1989 to 2006; Director, ORIX America, Inc., September 1972 to 2006; Director ORIX Financial Services, Inc., August 1963 to 2006.	9	Sojitz Corporation; Sony Corporation; Showa Shell Sekiyu K.K.; Yasuda EMP Limited; ORIX Corporation; ORIX Capital Markets, LLC; Nippon Venture Capital Co., Ltd.; Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited; ORIX Baseball Club Co.; ORIX USA Corporation and Subsidiaries

60

Name, Address* and Age	Position(s) Held with  the Fund	Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	No. of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen	Other Public Directorships Held
Osamu Nagayama (62)	Director	Director June 2005 to present	President and CEO, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 1978 to present	9	None

* The address of each Director is Nomura Partners Funds, Inc., c/o State Street Bank and Trust Company, 4 Copley Place, 5th Floor, Boston, MA 02116.

Corporation Officers

Set forth below are the names, ages, positions with the Corporation, length of term of office, principal occupations for the last five years, and any other directorships held of each of the persons currently serving as an officer of the Corporation. Unless otherwise noted, the address of each officer is State Street Bank and Trust Company, 4 Copley Place, 5th Floor, CPH-0326, Boston, MA 02116. The President, Treasurer and Secretary each hold office until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified; all other officers hold offices in accordance with the By-Laws of the Corporation. The following lists officers as of April 30, 2010.

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held with  the Fund	Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	No. of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen	Other Public Directorships Held
Richard J. Berthy* (51)	Principal Executive Officer and President	Principal Executive Officer and President, April 2010 to present; Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer, September 2009 to April 2010	President, Foreside Financial Group, LLC May 2008 to present; Chief Administrative Officer, Foreside Financial Group, LLC, January 2005 to May 2008; President, Bainbridge Capital Management, June 2004 to June 2006.	9	None

61

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held with  the Fund	Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	No. of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen	Other Public Directorships Held
Richard F. Cook, Jr.* (58)	Chief Compliance Officer+	Chief Compliance Officer, April 2007 to present	Director of Foreside Compliance Services, LLC, January 2006 to present; Founder and Managing Member of NorthLake, LLC, 2002 to present; Employee of Foreside Fund Services, LLC, November 2005 to January 2006.	9	None
James M. Atwood* (45)	Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer+	Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer, April 2010 to present	Compliance Analyst, Foreside Compliance Services, 2007-present: personal sabbatical, 2004-2007; Attorney, Pierce Atwood (law firm) , 2001-2004.	9	None
Trudance L. C. Bakke*(38)	Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer+	Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer, April 2010 to present Assistant Treasurer, April 2009 to April 2010	Director, Foreside Management Services, LLC, August 2006 to present; Product Manager, Citigroup Fund Services, LLC 2003 to 2006; Senior Manager of Corporate Finance, Forum Financial Group, LLC (a fund services company acquired by Citibank, N.A.) 1999- 2003.	9	None
William C. Cox** (42)	Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Secretary++	Assistant Treasurer, October 2007 to present	Vice President and Department Head, Fund Administration Division, State Street Bank and Trust Company, 2003 to present.	9	None

62

Name, Address and Age	Position(s) Held with the Fund	Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	No. of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen	Other Public Directorships Held
David James (39)	Secretary++	Secretary, November 2009 to present	Vice President and Managing Counsel, State Street Bank and Trust Company, November 2009 to present; Vice President and Counsel, PNC Global Investment Servicing (US), Inc. June 2006 to October 2009; Assistant Vice President and Counsel, State Street Bank and Trust Company, October 2000 to December 2004 and was retired in 2005.	9	None

* The address for Richard J. Berthy, Trudance L.C. Bakke, Richard F. Cook, Jr. and James Atwood is Foreside Financial Group, LLC, Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100, Portland, ME 04101.

** The address for William C. Cox is State Street Bank and Trust Company, 2 Avenue de Lafayette, 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02111.

+ The Corporation’s President, Treasurer, Assistant Treasurer, Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer each also serves as an officer to other unaffiliated mutual funds or closed-end funds for which Foreside Compliance Services, LLC, Foreside Fund Services, LLC, Foreside Management Services, LLC, or their affiliates act as compliance service provider, distributor or provider of other services.

++ David James and William C. Cox each also serves as an officer to other unaffiliated mutual funds or closed-end funds for which State Street Bank and Trust Company or its affiliates act as a provider of services.

Directors’ Responsibilities. The Board’ primary responsibility is to represent the interests of the Funds’ shareholders and to provide oversight of the management of each Fund. Currently, 83% of the Board is comprised of Independent Directors.

The Directors meet multiple times during the year to review the investment performance of the Funds and other operational matters, including policies and procedures designed to assure compliance with regulatory and other requirements. For the Funds’ most recently completed fiscal year, the Directors conducted 18 meetings to deal with Fund issues (including regular and special board and committee meetings). These meetings included four regular board meetings, four special board meetings, two Fair Value Committee meeting, three Audit Committee meetings, zero Nominating Committee meetings, three Executive Committee meetings and two Investment Oversight Committee meetings.

The Independent Directors review the fees paid to NAM USA and the sub-advisors for investment advisory services and other administrative and shareholder services.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee recommends the selection of the Funds’ independent auditor to the Board; reviews the independence of such firm; reviews the scope of audit and internal controls; and considers and reports to the Board on matters relating to the Funds’ accounting and financial reporting practices. Messrs. Birdsong, Azar, Firestone, Isayama, Miyauchi and Nagayama currently serve as members of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met three (3) times in the Funds’ most recently completed fiscal year.

Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee selects and nominates directors for the Corporation. Fund shareholders may also submit nominees that will be considered by the Nominating Committee when a Board vacancy occurs. Submissions should be mailed to the attention of the Secretary of the Corporation. Messrs. Azar, Birdsong, Firestone, Isayama, Miyauchi and Nagayama currently serve as members of the Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee did not meet in the Funds’ most recently completed fiscal year.

63

Fair Value Committee. The Fair Value Committee oversees Fund valuation matters such as valuation methodologies. The Fair Value Committee also establishes “fair valuation” procedures to determine fair market value of securities held by a Fund when actual market values are unavailable. Messrs. Azar, Birdsong, Firestone Givens, James (non-voting), Berthy (non-voting), Nakano and Ms. Bakke (non-voting) currently serve as members of the Fair Value Committee. The Fair Value Committee met two (2) times in the Funds’ most recently completed fiscal year.

Executive Committee. The Executive Committee is empowered with all of the powers of the Directors not otherwise delegated, to the extent permitted by law, when the full Board is not in session. These duties and powers include, but are not limited to: the determination of persons to serve as members of the Board who are not “interested persons” and the nomination of the appropriate number of candidates for election as “Independent” members of the Board in connection with each meeting of shareholders at which members of the Board are to be elected, or which is to be filled by a Independent member of the Board. Messrs. Azar, Birdsong and Miyauchi currently serve as members of the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee met three (3) times in the Funds’ most recently completed fiscal year.

Investment Oversight Committee. The Investment Oversight Committee oversees the performance of the Funds between Board meetings and the preparation of reports to the full Board. Messrs. Azar, Birdsong, Givens and Isayama currently serve as members of the Investment Oversight Committee. The Investment Oversight Committee met two (2) times in the Funds’ most recently completed fiscal year.

Share Ownership. The following table shows the dollar amount range of each Director’s “beneficial ownership” of shares of the Funds as of December 31, 2009.

Director	Dollar Range of Fund Shares Owned		Aggregate Dollar Range of Shares Owned of All Funds in the Corporation*
J. Douglas Azar	The Japan Fund	$10,001 - $50,000	$10,001 - $50,000
	Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	$0
	India Fund	$0
	Greater China Fund	$0
	Global Equity Income Fund	$0
	Global Emerging Markets Fund	$0
	Global Alpha Equity Fund	$0
	International Growth Equity Fund	$0
	International Equity Fund	$0
Lynn S. Birdsong	The Japan Fund	$10,001 - $50,000	$10,001 - $50,000
	Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	$0
	India Fund	$0
	Greater China Fund	$0
	Global Equity Income Fund	$0
	Global Emerging Markets Fund	$0
	Global Alpha Equity Fund	$0
	International Growth Equity Fund	$0
	International Equity Fund	$0
James A. Firestone	The Japan Fund	$10,001 - $50,000	$10,001 - $50,000
	Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	$0
	India Fund	$0
	Greater China Fund	$0
	Global Equity Income Fund	$0
	Global Emerging Markets Fund	$0
	Global Alpha Equity Fund	$0
	International Growth Equity Fund	$0
	International Equity Fund	$0
William L. Givens	The Japan Fund	$10,001 - $50,000	$10,001 - $50,000

64

Director	Dollar Range of Fund Shares Owned		Aggregate Dollar Range of Shares Owned of All Funds in the Corporation*
	Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	$0
	India Fund	$0
	Greater China Fund	$0
	Global Equity Income Fund	$0
	Global Emerging Markets Fund	$0
	Global Alpha Equity Fund	$0
	International Growth Equity Fund	$0
	International Equity Fund	$0
Takeshi Isayama	The Japan Fund	$0	$0
	Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	$0
	India Fund	$0
	Greater China Fund	$0
	Global Equity Income Fund	$0
	Global Emerging Markets Fund	$0
	Global Alpha Equity Fund	$0
	International Growth Equity Fund	$0
	International Equity Fund	$0
Yoshihiko Miyauchi	The Japan Fund	$0	$0
	Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	$0
	India Fund	$0
	Greater China Fund	$0
	Global Equity Income Fund	$0
	Global Emerging Markets Fund	$0
	Global Alpha Equity Fund	$0
	International Growth Equity Fund	$0
	International Equity Fund	$0
Osamu Nagayama	The Japan Fund	$0	$0
	Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	$0
	India Fund	$0
	Greater China Fund	$0
	Global Equity Income Fund	$0
	Global Emerging Markets Fund	$0
	Global Alpha Equity Fund	$0
	International Growth Equity Fund	$0
	International Equity Fund	$0

65

Director	Dollar Range of Fund Shares Owned		Aggregate Dollar Range of Shares Owned of All Funds in the Corporation*
Atsushi Yoshikawa±	The Japan Fund	$0	$0
	Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	$0
	India Fund	$0
	Greater China Fund	$0
	Global Equity Income Fund	$0
	Global Emerging Markets Fund	$0
	Global Alpha Equity Fund	$0
	International Growth Equity Fund	$0
	International Equity Fund	$0

* The valuation date is December 31, 2009.

± Mr. Yoshikawa resigned on January 20, 2010.

None of the Independent Directors or their immediate family members beneficially owned securities of the entities serving as advisor or distributor to any Fund on December 31, 2008 or any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with the advisor, subadvisors or distributor to any Fund on December 31, 2009.

Directors of the Corporation are eligible to purchase Class I shares of the Funds, and are not subject to the $1,000,000 minimum investment. In addition, certain employees and affiliates of NAM USA, Nomura Holdings, Inc. and/or the sub-advisors to the Funds are permitted to purchase Class I shares of the Funds, and are also not subject to the $1,000,000 minimum investment.

Remuneration. Each Director, other than Mr. Yoshikawa±, receives compensation from the Funds for his services, which includes an annual retainer and an attendance fee for each meeting attended. No additional compensation is paid to any Director for travel time to meetings, attendance at director’s educational seminars or conferences, service on industry or association committees, or participation as speakers at directors’ conferences. Under special circumstances, it is possible that a Director could receive additional compensation for services outside of the normal scope of a Director’s responsibilities.

66

No members of the Board are employees of NAM USA, any sub-advisor or any of their respective affiliates.

Director and Officer Compensation

NAM USA pays all compensation of all Directors and officers of the Corporation who are affiliated with NAM USA or any of its affiliates. For the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation paid to each Director not affiliated with NAM USA or any of its affiliates an annual fee of $27,000 plus $3,000 per Board meetings, $1,500 for audit committee, investment oversight committee or executive committee or dinner meetings and $250 per valuation meeting attended, together with such Director’s actual out-of-pocket expenses relating to attendance at meetings. In addition the Audit Committee chairman is paid a quarterly retainer of $750 (and effective May 1, 2010 the IOC chairman is also paid a quarterly retainer of $750) and effective February 1, 2010 the Chairman of the Board is paid an additional annual retainer of $27,000. Effective, May 1, 2010, the Corporation pays to each Director not affiliated with NAM USA or any of its affiliates an annual fee of $27,000, plus $3,000 per quarterly Board meeting and in-person Independent Directors meeting, $1,500 for audit committee, investment oversight committee special telephonic Board, special telephonic Independent Directors, executive committee or dinner meetings and $250 per valuation meeting attended, together with such Director’s actual out-of-pocket expenses relating to attendance at meetings.

The following table shows the aggregate compensation paid by the Corporation to each Director and officer for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009. None of the Independent Directors serve on any boards for the other funds advised by NAM Tokyo or its advisory subsidiaries. Also, any officer of the Corporation who is an officer, director or employee of NAM USA, the Administrator, the Distributor or their affiliates does not receive remuneration from the Corporation. Accordingly, the Chairman has waived receipt of these fees.

Name of Director or Officer	Aggregate Compensation*	Retirement Benefits	Total Compensation from the Fund and Fund Complex**
Interested Directors
William L. Givens (1)	—	Not Applicable	—
Atsushi Yoshikawa±	—		—
Independent Directors
J. Douglas Azar	46,250	Not Applicable	46,250
Lynn S. Birdsong	47,000	Not Applicable	47,000
James A. Firestone	42,750	Not Applicable	42,750
Shinji Fukukawa	17,250	Not Applicable	17,250
Takeshi Isayama	41,250	Not Applicable	41,250
Yoshihiko Miyauchi	38,250	Not Applicable	38,250
Osamu Nagayama	38,250	Not Applicable	38,250
Officers
William L. Givens(1)	334,411	Not Applicable	334,411

* Does not include pension or retirement benefits.

** The “Fund Complex” consists of the Corporation, Japan Smaller Capitalization Fund, Inc. and Korea Equity Fund, Inc. Does not include pension or retirement benefits accrued.

(1) William L. Givens was designated Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and received a salary of $135,000 per year until December 26, 2008 when his salary was increased to $300,000. Mr. Givens waived his fees for serving as a Director and for serving as Chairman until February 1, 2010. Effective April 1, 2010 Mr. Givens no longer serves as Chief Executive Officer

± Mr. Yoshikawa resigned on January 2010.

67

CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

As of December 31, 2009, the following persons owned of record or beneficially 5% or more of shares of each share class of each Fund:

The Japan Fund	Percentage of Class (%)
Class S Shares
CHARLES SCHWAB CO INC ATTN MUTUAL FUNDS DEPARTMENT SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104-4151	18.45
NFS LLC FEBO FMT CO CUST IRA ROLLOVER HOUSTON TX 77062-4510	6.89
Class A Shares
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	100.00
Class C Shares
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	100.00
Class I Shares
THE NOMURA TRUST AND BANKING CO LTD OTEMACHI CHIYODA-KU TOKYO 100-0004	100.00
Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund
Class A Shares
SSB&T CO ROTH IRA CUST FBO JOSEPH F W MAZZA NEW HYDE PARK NY 11040-5556	63.17
HAROLD A TAYLOR JR THERESA K TAYLOR JTTEN SUMMIT POINT WV 25446-0185	19.79
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	15.94
Class C Shares
SSB&T CO IRA OF CUST FBO JOEL DAVID CARPENTER RICHLAND MI 49083-8521	69.20
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	30.80
Class I Shares
THE NOMURA TRUST AND BANKING CO LTD FBO TRUST TKN1141012 3/2/2007 OTEMACHI CHIYODA-KU TOKYO 100-0004	88.00

68

NOMURA PARTNERS INC. INTERNATIONAL EQUITY FUND NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	12.00
India Fund
Class A Shares
MATTHEW KLINE CUST FBO GABRIEL MOSHE KLINE UTMA MA ACTON MA 01720-7760	44.83
SSB&T CO ROTH IRA CUST FBO DONALD SEGRIST ONSTED MI 49265-9463	32.06
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	23.11
Class C Shares
SSB&T CO IRA OF CUST FBO JOEL DAVID CARPENTER RICHLAND MI 49083-8521	64.68
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	35.32
Class I Shares
THE NOMURA TRUST AND BANKING CO LTD OTEMACHI CHIYODA-KU TOKYO 100-0004	100.00
Greater China Fund
Class A Shares
SSB&T CO IRA CUST FBO JUDITH ANN BROOKS VIENNA VA 22182-3932	78.40
SSB&T CO IRA CUST FBO SERGIO FALBO GDN ELIZABETH J FALBO MINOR SYCAMORE IL 60178-8128	8.09
FBO GABRIEL MOSHE KLINE UTMA MA ACTON MA 01720-7760	8.02

69

Class C Shares
SSB&T CO IRA OF CUST FBO JOEL DAVID CARPENTER RICHLAND MI 49083-8521	60.88
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	26.62
SCOTTRADE INC FBO ROSS FONTENOT ROTH IRA ST LOUIS MO 63131-0759	12.51
Class I Shares
THE NOMURA TRUST AND BANKING CO LTD OTEMACHI CHIYODA-KU TOKYO 100-0004	100.00
Global Equity Income Fund
Class A Shares
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	100.00
Class C Shares
SSB&T CO IRA OF CUST FBO JOEL DAVID CARPENTER RICHLAND MI 49083-8521	62.62
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	37.38
Class I Shares
THE NOMURA TRUST AND BANKING CO LTD OTEMACHI CHIYODA-KU TOKYO 100-0004	100.00
Global Emerging Markets Fund
Class A Shares
MLPF S THE SOLE BENEFIT OF FOR ITS CUSTOMERS ATTN FUND ADMINISTRATION 97D90 JACKSONVILLE FL 32246-6484	87.81
Class C Shares
MORGAN KEEGAN & COMPANY INC MEMPHIS TN 38103-1199	63.75

70

SSB&T CO IRA OF CUST FBO JOEL DAVID CARPENTER RICHLAND MI 49083-8521	24.91
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	11.34
Class I Shares
THE NOMURA TRUST AND BANKING CO LTD OTEMACHI CHIYODA-KU TOKYO 100-0004	100.00
Global Alpha Equity Fund
Class A Shares
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	100.00
Class C Shares
MLPF S THE SOLE BENEFIT OF FOR ITS CUSTOMERS ATTN FUND ADMINISTRATION 97D90 JACKSONVILLE FL 32246-6484	81.02
SSB&T CO IRA OF CUST FBO JOEL DAVID CARPENTER RICHLAND MI 49083-8521	13.67
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	5.30
Class I Shares
THE NOMURA TRUST AND BANKING CO LTD OTEMACHI CHIYODA-KU TOKYO 100-0004	100.00
International Growth Equity Fund
Class A Shares
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	100.00
Class I Shares
THE NOMURA TRUST AND BANKING CO LTD OTEMACHI CHIYODA-KU TOKYO 100-0004	100.00
Class C Shares
SSB&T CO IRA OF CUST FBO JOEL DAVID CARPENTER RICHLAND MI 49083-8521	72.13

71

NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	27.87
International Equity Fund
Class A Shares
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	100.00
Class C Shares
SSB&T CO IRA OF CUST FBO JOEL DAVID CARPENTER RICHLAND MI 49083-8521	72.41
NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT USA INC NEW YORK NY 10281-1008	27.59
Class I Shares
THE NOMURA TRUST AND BANKING CO LTD OTEMACHI CHIYODA-KU TOKYO 100-0004	100.00

As of December 31, 2009, all Directors and officers of the Corporation, as a group, owned beneficially (as that term is defined in Section 13(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934) less than 1.00% of the outstanding shares of any class of any Fund.

72

ORGANIZATION OF THE FUND

The Corporation was incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland in 1961. Effective December 1, 2008, the Corporation changed its name from The Japan Fund, Inc. to Nomura Partners Funds, Inc. Currently, the Corporation is comprised of nine series: The Japan Fund, the Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund, the India Fund, the Greater China Fund, the Global Equity Income Fund, the Global Emerging Markets Fund, the Global Alpha Equity Fund, the International Growth Equity Fund and the International Equity Fund.

The authorized capital stock of the Corporation consists of 1,400,000,000 shares of a par value of $0.33 ¹/3 divided into the nine series as follows:

Common Stock	The Japan Fund	Asia Pacific ex Japan Fund	India Fund	Greater China Fund	Global Equity Income Fund
Class A	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000
Class C	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000
Class I	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000
Class S	50,000,000

Common Stock	Global Emerging Markets Fund	Global Alpha Equity Fund	International Growth Equity Fund	International Equity Fund
Class A	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000
Class C	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000
Class I	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000	50,000,000

The Class S shares of The Japan Fund are available for purchase only by current Class S shareholders who were Class S shareholders of record as of December 31, 2008, and for dividend and capital gain reinvestment of Class S shares by such shareholders. All shares issued and outstanding are fully paid and non-assessable, transferable, and redeemable at net asset value, subject to such charges as may be applicable, at the option of the shareholder. Shares have no preemptive rights or conversion rights (except as described below). Redemption and exchange rights are discussed elsewhere herein and in the Corporation’s Prospectus. Each share of each class of a Fund has equal rights with respect to each other share of the same class as to dividends and distributions declared by the Fund and in the net assets of the Fund upon liquidation or dissolution after satisfaction of outstanding liabilities. The Board may determine that shares of a Fund or a class of a Fund shall be automatically converted into shares of another fund of the Corporation or of another class of the same or another fund based on the relative net assets of such fund or class at the time of conversion. The Board may also provide that the holders of shares of the Fund or a class of the Fund shall have the right to convert their shares into shares of one or more other funds or classes on terms established by the Board.

The shares of the Funds have non-cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than 50% of the shares voting for the election of Directors can elect 100% of the Directors if they choose to do so, and, in such event, the holders of the remaining less than 50% of the shares voting for the election of Directors will not be able to elect any person or persons to the Board.

Shareholders of a Fund are entitled to one vote for each share held in the election of Directors and generally on other matters submitted to the vote of shareholders of the Fund or the Corporation. All shares of all classes or Funds shall vote as a single class or Fund; provided, however, that as to any matter with respect to which a separate vote of any class or Fund is required by the 1940 Act or by the Maryland General Corporation Law, such requirement as to a separate vote by that class or Fund shall apply in lieu of the single class/Fund voting described above. As to any matter which does not affect the interest of a particular class or Fund, only the holders of shares of the one or more affected classes or Funds shall be entitled to vote.

No Fund intends to hold annual meetings of shareholders in any year in which the 1940 Act does not require shareholders to act upon any of the following matters: (i) election of Directors; (ii) approval of a management agreement; (iii) approval of a distribution agreement; and (iv) ratification of selection of independent accountants.

The by-laws of the Corporation require that a special meeting of shareholders be held upon the written request of 50% of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at such meeting, if they comply with applicable Maryland law.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Internet Access

World Wide Website – The Corporation’s website address is http://www.nomurapartnersfunds.com. This site enables users to access or view the current Funds’ Prospectus and related information. Users can access new account forms online and request literature on the Funds. The Corporation’s prior website address, www.thejapanfund.com, may also be used to access the Corporation’s website.

73

Other Information

Many of the investment transactions in the Funds will be made at prices different from those market prices prevailing at the time such changes are reflected in a regular report to shareholders of the Funds. These transactions will reflect investment decisions made by each Fund’s sub-advisor in light of the objectives and policies of such Fund, and such factors as its other portfolio holdings and tax considerations and should not be construed as recommendations for similar action by other investors.

The Funds may pay unaffiliated third parties for providing recordkeeping and other administrative services with respect to accounts of participants in retirement plans or other beneficial owners of Fund shares whose interests are held in an omnibus account.

The Funds’ Prospectus and this SAI omit certain information contained in the registration statement which the Corporation has filed with the SEC under the 1933 Act, as amended, and reference is hereby made to the registration statement for further information with respect to the Fund and the securities offered hereby. The Corporation’s registration statement is available for inspection by the public at the SEC in Washington, D.C. or online at www.sec.gov.

PROXY VOTING

The Board has delegated the responsibility for decisions regarding proxy voting for securities held by the Funds to NAM USA, who in turn has delegated the responsibility to the sub-advisors. Each sub-advisor will vote such proxies in accordance with its proxy policies and procedures, which are included in Appendices A, B and C to this SAI. The Board will periodically review the Funds’ proxy voting records.

Each Fund is required to disclose annually its complete proxy voting records on Form N-PX. The Japan Fund’s proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th, and the proxy voting records for all other Funds for the period from inception to June 30th, are available upon request by calling the Fund at 1-800-535-2726 and on the Corporation’s website at www.nomurapartnersfunds.com. The Funds’ Forms N-PX are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The financial statements, including the investment portfolio of each Fund, together with the report of BBD, LLP, independent registered public accountants, Financial Highlights and notes to financial statements in the Annual Report to the Shareholders of the Corporation dated September 30, 2009 are incorporated herein by reference and are hereby deemed to be a part of this SAI. The financial statements, including the investment portfolios of each Fund, together with the Financial Highlights and notes to the financial statements in the Semi-Annual Report to shareholders of the Corporation dated March 31, 2009 are incorporated herein by reference and are deemed to be a part of this SAI.

74

APPENDIX A

Proxy Voting Policy

NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT

Nomura Asset Management Co., Ltd.

Nomura Asset Management U.S.A. Inc.

Nomura Asset Management U.K. Limited

Nomura Asset Management Singapore Limited

Nomura Asset Management Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.

Nomura Islamic Asset Management Sdn. Bhd.

Nomura Asset Management Hong Kong Limited

May 2009

I. Basic Policy for Proxy Voting

This Proxy Voting Policy has been adopted by Nomura Asset Management Co., Ltd. and its investment advisory subsidiaries.* These companies are hereinafter collectively referred to as “NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT”. The overall objective of NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT is to increase the value of its clients’ investments. We recognize that to establish the power to influence management through voting rights is an effective way to achieve such an objective. NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT believes the proxy voting right is an important financial asset that must be managed with the same care and diligence as any other client asset. We exercise proxy voting decisions solely in the best long-term interests of our clients. When we acquire a company’s equity securities, we do so in the belief that they are a sound investment. We will not acquire equity securities simply to obtain control of or influence over an issuer.

* (Nomura Asset Management U.S.A. Inc., Nomura Asset Management U.K. Limited, Nomura Asset Management Singapore Limited, Nomura Asset Management Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., Nomura Islamic Asset Management Sdn. Bhd., Nomura Asset Management Hong Kong Limited)

II. Proxy Voting Guidelines

NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT closely examines the voting agendas of a company in the cases listed below. Where we believe that a specific agenda item is not in the interests of shareholders, NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT shall decide either to vote against or to abstain from voting on the item. Proxy voting Guidelines are applied in cases:

(1) Where it is found that the company has violated the law or otherwise engaged in antisocial activity. However, NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT shall not exercise the proxy voting rights solely as a means to address specific social or political issues, irrespective of investment returns of the company.

(2) Where the auditor’s opinion on the company is qualified (for Japanese equity securities).

(3) Where the company’s disclosure is determined to be inadequate, and therefore, deemed harmful to shareholders’ interests.

(4) Where the company continuously reports sluggish business performance and poor investment returns, and where we consider the management’s efforts for improvement to be inadequate.

(5) Where the company accumulates a large amount of financial assets, which are neither used effectively nor distributed to shareholders adequately.

(6) Where the company’s business and financial strategies are deemed to harm shareholders’ interests.

(7) Where the composition and size of the company’s board of directors or the composition of its statutory auditors are deemed inadequate, and likely to harm the shareholders’ interest.

(8) Shareholder proposals.

(9) Extraordinary agenda items, such as amendments to the company’s articles of incorporation, which are likely to harm shareholders’ interest.

A-1

III. Positions on Specific Issues

(1) Election of Directors

NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT votes in favor of candidates for the board of directors that are nominated by the issuer’s management when it is determined that such candidates would best serve our clients’ best interests.

The size of the board should be adequate and appropriate considering the nature of the company’s business and its scale.

If the company’s business performance remains sluggish over a long period and little remedial effort is apparent, or if the company is found to have engaged in any antisocial activity or any activity that would harm shareholder value, NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT will carefully assess the qualifications of the directors who have served during the said period or at the time of such activity in voting on their reelection.

In principle, we vote for the election of outside directors, provided that we take into consideration such elements as the competence and experience of the candidates for outside director.

With respect to proposals that call for a staggering of the terms of the directors, when it is determined that such a change would harm the effectiveness of corporate governance, we would oppose such a proposal.

Because outside directors of companies that have adopted the committee system play an especially essential role in each of the three committees—nomination, compensation and audit—special consideration should be paid to the directors’ qualifications, such as independence. Companies have transferred the decision-making for many important matters, such as disposition of profits, from shareholders to the executive officers and the board of directors of the company. In consideration of this fact, the qualifications of the director for the office should be judged upon careful review of the assessment of the board of directors.

(2) Election of Auditors

Auditors are expected to be qualified to audit the business of directors on behalf of shareholders, and to function adequately for that purpose.

Where the company has engaged in a certain antisocial or illegal activity in which an auditor is found responsible for any part thereof, or determined to have failed to fully perform his/her duties, we will form a negative opinion on the reelection of such an auditor.

It is desirable to ensure that the outside auditors are independent of management. It is not desirable to have the audit committee composed of outside auditors all of whom lack independence. Where a reduction in the number of auditors is proposed, there should be proper justification for such a reduction.

(3) Executive Compensation

NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT votes for management compensation plans that in its view, are reasonable, especially equity-based compensation plans that are aligned with the long-term interests of the company’s shareholders. However, we vote against plans that are inconsistent with or inequitable compared to the company’s overall financial condition, or that would substantially dilute the interests of shareholders.

When a company is discovered to have engaged in antisocial activities, we expect to see corrective measures reflected in management’s compensation.

It is desirable for the company to disclose management’s compensation so that shareholders can determine whether or not it is fair and reasonable.

(4) Stock Option

In principle, we vote for stock option plans when the conditions of the plan, such as eligibility and its scale, are properly set forth for the purpose of promoting the incentives of the executives and employees. However, we vote against such plans when the conditions are deemed to be improper.

(5) Capital Policy

• Distribution policy

In deciding on the distributions to its shareholders, the company should ensure that such distributions are consistent with its long-term investment plan. While we view the acquisition of the company’s own stock positively as a means to enhance the company’s value, it is always necessary to determine whether this is the most appropriate distribution method for the sake of the company’s long-term capital structure.

• Change in number of authorized shares

An increase in the number of authorized shares is required for a variety of legitimate business purposes, including financing, stock splits, corporate reorganizations, or debt for equity exchanges. NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT will

A-2

vote for a company’s proposed increase in the number of authorized shares unless it is considered a special circumstance proposal. Such proposals are assessed on a case-by-case basis.

• Issuance of preferred and other classes of shares

NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT will carefully scrutinize proposals with respect to the issuance of shares in special cases, such as to authorize the board of directors to issue preferred shares with discretion to determine such conditions as voting rights, conversion, dividend and transferability (“Blank Check” Preferred Shares). We recognize that while such classes of shares are generally issued for financing purposes, they could hinder growth in shareholder value.

(6) Corporate Restructuring

• Mergers, acquisitions and other corporate restructurings

NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT reviews all proposals for mergers, acquisitions and other forms of corporate restructuring on a case-by-case basis by evaluating the financial impact on our clients.

• Anti-takeover measures

NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT will not vote, in principle, for proposals that make it more difficult for a company to be acquired by another company. We believe that anti-takeover measures can depress a company’s market value.

However, we may vote for proposals, based on individual analysis and on a case-by-case basis, only when we have clearly determined that they are primarily intended to protect shareholder value rather than the management itself.

(7) Corporate Social Responsibility

The management of a company is responsible for the firm’s day-to-day business activities. Rather than rendering a judgment on specific social or political matters, NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT will, in principle, honor the management’s business judgment on such matters. However, NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT may decide to vote on such social or political matters on a case-by-case basis when such matters may have an impact on investment returns. In making judgments on such proposals, we pay close attention to individual circumstances in each country.

IV. Conflicts of Interest

In exercising voting rights, there may arise conflicts of interest (for example, NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT may have a business relationship with an issuer whose securities are held in client portfolios. and over which we have proxy voting discretion).

When such a conflict of interest arises, NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT shall vote, in order to remain impartial in the exercising of proxy voting rights, based on recommendations made by third-party proxy voting service vendors. We recognize the necessity of such recommendations by these vendors only when NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT generates from its business relationship with an issuer an amount of more than 1 percent of the total revenue of NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT, and when the proposal to be voted on may provide an undue enrichment to the director, officer, or another affiliate of such issuer. Where the revenue from a business relationship with the issuer is more than 0.5 percent of the total revenue of NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT, we will closely examine the proposal to see whether there is any potential conflict of interest.

With respect to shares of Nomura Holdings, Inc. and its affiliated companies that are held in client portfolios, we shall seek advice from third-party proxy voting service vendors.

***************

Principles on Corporate Governance of Portfolio Companies

Purpose of the Principles

1. For a company to manage its business operations with due consideration for shareholders’ interests and steady long-term earnings, it is crucial for the company’s corporate governance to function adequately. As an investment manager, NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT has established basic corporate governance principles (described below) that it looks for in companies that are held within its portfolios. We monitor the business operations of companies in which we invest to ensure consistency with these principles. We believe that companies that follow these principles operate their businesses with autonomy in a way that enhances shareholders’ interests/value in the long term. On the other hand, where no continued expansion of shareholder value is recognized in a company, or where the company’s business performance or investment return has been sluggish, we will seek to promote investors’ (beneficiaries’) interests by demanding the company take corrective measures.

A-3

Ideal Form of Corporate Governance

2. We believe the following are the most appropriate forms of corporate governance to serve long-term shareholders’ interests:

• The board consists of an adequate number of directors qualified for rendering proper business judgments and effective functioning.

• The statutory auditors are qualified to audit the activities and functions performed by directors on behalf of shareholders.

• Where the board of directors has designated committees of the board to carry out specific functions, each committee shall consist of qualified members and operate with independence.

• Executives’ compensation is well balanced with long-term investment returns, reflecting improvements in shareholders’ value and appropriate management incentives.

• The corporate governance system is in place to ensure sufficient internal control in terms of compliance and internal auditing.

Accountability through Disclosure

3. We will request that companies uphold their accountability through timely and proper public disclosure in order for us to monitor their corporate governance. We will demand full disclosure and explanation as well as corrective measures with respect to any illegal or antisocial activity if any.

Dialogue with Companies

4. NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT, as an investment manager, will step up its dialogue with companies regarding their corporate governance efforts.

Exercise of the Voting Rights

5. NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT will vote proxies on behalf of its clients in a manner consistent with the corporate governance principles stated above and seek that companies manage their business operations with due consideration for shareholders’ long-term interests.

******************************************

A-4

APPENDIX B

MARTIN CURRIE INC. – COMPLIANCE MANUAL

STATEMENT OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES – PROXY VOTING

Introduction

As a registered investment advisor, Martin Currie, Inc. (“Martin Currie,” “we” or “us”) has a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of our clients. As part of this duty, we recognize that we must exercise voting rights in the best interests of our clients.

Martin Currie recognizes the importance of good corporate governance in ensuring that management and boards of directors fulfill their obligations to shareholders. As part of our investment process, we take into account the attitudes of management and boards of directors on corporate governance issues when deciding whether to invest in a company.

Martin Currie is a global investment manager, and invests significantly in emerging markets. It should be noted that protection for shareholders may vary significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and in some cases may be substantially less than in the U.S. or developed countries.

This statement is intended to comply with Rule 206(4)-6 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. It sets forth the policy and procedures of Martin Currie, Inc. for voting proxies for our clients, including investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

I. Proxy Voting Policies

Our proxy voting is carried out by a third party, Risk Metrics. The way Risk Metrics vote on recommendations is based on their research and according to set guidelines (‘Risk Metrics/NAPF guidelines’) agreed with Martin Currie. ‘NAPF’ stands for National Association of Pension Funds. Where Martin Currie wishes the vote to be contrary to the Risk Metrics/NAPF guidelines, an instruction to do so will be given to Metrics. Where we vote against the Risk Metrics/NAPF guidelines, evidence will be retained to show the reason why.

It is the general policy of the Risk Metrics/NAPF guidelines to support the management of the companies in which Martin Currie invests. Votes will therefore generally be cast in accordance with management’s proposals. However, Martin Currie reserves the right to depart from the Risk Metrics/NAPF guidelines in order to avoid voting decisions that we believe may be contrary to our clients’ best interests. Martin Currie has overall responsibility to ensure that we are voting in accordance with this Policy and in the interests of our clients.

Elections of Directors: In many instances, election of directors is a routine voting issue. Unless there is a proxy fight for seats on the board or we determine that there are other compelling reasons for withholding votes for directors, we will vote in favor of the management proposed slate of directors. Reasons why we would not vote in favor include where the election of insiders or affiliated outsiders would cause the board not to be deemed independent, where directors have adopted a poison pill without shareholder approval since the company’s last annual meeting and there is no requirement to put the pill to shareholder vote within 12 months of its adoption or where directors have failed to address the issue(s) that resulted in any of the directors receiving more than 50% withheld votes out of those cast at the previous board election. Consideration would be given as to whether the directors have responded to shareholder actions that have received significant shareholder support. We may withhold votes for directors who fail to act on key issues such as failure to implement proposals to declassify boards, failure to implement a majority vote requirement, failure to submit a rights plan to a shareholder vote and failure to act on tender offers where a majority of shareholders have tendered their shares.

Appointment of Auditors: The selection of an independent accountant to audit a company’s financial statements is generally a routine business matter. Martin Currie believes that management remains in the best position to choose the accounting firm and will generally support management’s recommendation. Voting however would be on a case-by-case basis taking into account, amongst others, the following factors—the tenure of the audit firm, the establishment and disclosure of a renewal process whereby the auditor is regularly evaluated for both audit quality and competitive price, the length of the rotation period and significant audit-related issues.

Changes in Capital Structure: Changes in a company’s charter, articles of incorporation or by-laws are often technical and administrative in nature. Martin Currie will generally cast its votes in accordance with the company’s management on such proposals but this will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Corporate Restructurings, Mergers and Acquisitions: Martin Currie would vote reorganizations/ restructurings on a case-by-case basis based on such features as the fairness opinion, pricing, strategic rationale, and the negotiating process.

B-1

Corporate Governance: Martin Currie recognizes the importance of good corporate governance in ensuring that management and the board of directors fulfill their obligations to the shareholders. We generally favor proposals promoting transparency and accountability within a company.

Social and Corporate Responsibility: Martin Currie recognizes the importance of supporting sound and responsible policies in relation to social, political and environmental issues. However, in the interests of shareholders, we reserve the right to vote against proposals that are unduly burdensome or result in unnecessary and excessive costs to the company. We may abstain from voting on social proposals that do not have a readily determinable financial impact on shareholder value.

Executive Compensation: Martin Currie generally votes case-by-case. Risk Metrics applies a quantitative methodology. We would vote against a plan if the cost exceeds the allowable cap. We would vote for a plan if the cost is reasonable unless certain conditions apply, for example, the plan expressly permits repricing of underwater options without shareholder approval or the company’s most recent three year burn rate is excessive and it is an outlier within its peer group.

Proxy Voting Procedures

II. Proxy voting

Risk Metrics is responsible for voting on behalf of Martin Currie according to the Risk Metrics/NAPF guidelines. The Product and Sector Managers are responsible for ensuring that where they wish to vote contrary to the Risk Metrics/NAPF guidelines, they inform the Middle Office team. The Middle Office team will inform Risk Metrics of how we wish to vote in this specific instance. The Middle Office is responsible for ensuring that full and adequate records of proxy voting are kept including the Product and Sector Manager’s rationale for voting contrary to the Risk Metrics/NAPF guidelines.

III. Review of Proxy Voting Policies

The Chief Compliance Officer will ensure that an annual review is carried out of the Firm’s Proxy Voting Policy. The Risk & Compliance team overseen by the Chief Compliance Officer will also consider specific proxy voting matters as and when deemed necessary.

IV. Conflicts of Interest

Martin Currie recognizes that there is a potential conflict of interest when we vote a proxy solicited by an issuer with whom we have any material business or personal relationship that may affect how we vote on the issuer’s proxy.

As a third party is voting according to set guidelines, a conflict of interest will not exist where the client is voted in accordance with those guidelines. However if a Product or Sector Manager requests that we vote contrary to our policy or the Risk Metrics/NAPF guidelines for a client with whom we have any material business or personal relationship, the matter will be referred to the Risk & Compliance team by the Middle Office team. We would consider a possible conflict of interest to exist where proxy votes are issued by existing clients or where Martin Currie holds a significant voting percentage of the company.

V. Proxies of Certain Non-U.S. Issuers

Proxy voting in certain countries requires “share blocking.” That is, shareholders wishing to vote their proxies must deposit their shares shortly before the date of the meeting (usually one-week) with a designated depositary. During this blocking period, shares that will be voted at the meeting cannot be sold until the meeting has taken place and the shares are returned to the clients’ custodian banks. Martin Currie has determined that the value of exercising the vote does not outweigh the detriment of not being able to transact in the shares during this period. Accordingly, if share blocking is required we are likely to abstain from voting those shares.

(9) Proxy Voting Record

Clients may obtain information on how Martin Currie voted with respect to their proxies by contacting our Client services team at Martin Currie, Inc., Saltire Court, 20 Castle Terrace, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH1 2ES, tel. 011-44-131-229-5252, fax 011-44-131-222-2527, email clientservices@martincurrie.com.

There is a summary of the Proxy voting procedure available.

Amended: May 2008

B-2

APPENDIX C

McKinley Capital Management, LLC

Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures

Revised 03.01.2010

McKinley Capital Management, LLC (“McKinley Capital”) must comply with regulatory and client directed proxy voting policies as described below.

Regulatory Requirement

A registered investment adviser with voting authority over proxies for clients’ securities must adopt policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that the adviser votes proxies in the best interests of clients; discloses information to clients about those policies and procedures; and describes to clients how they may obtain information about how the adviser has voted the clients’ proxies (these requirements are in Rule 206(4)-6 under the SEC Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act)).

An adviser who votes proxies on behalf of clients must also retain certain records, including proxy voting policies and procedures; the proxy statements received regarding client’s securities (the Rule provides some alternative arrangements); records of the votes cast on behalf of clients; records of client requests for proxy voting information; and any documents that were material to making a decision as to how to vote or that memorialized the basis for a decision (these requirements are described in the Advisers Act Rule 204-2(c)(2)).

Procedures and Practices

McKinley Capital’s Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) has the responsibility for the implementation and monitoring of our proxy voting policy, practices, disclosures and record keeping, including outlining our voting guidelines in our procedures.

McKinley Capital is generally authorized by its clients, as a term of its Investment Advisory Agreement, to vote proxies for the securities held in clients’ investment accounts. At their election, however, clients may retain this authority, in which case McKinley Capital will consult with clients regarding proxy voting decisions as requested. For the clients for whom McKinley Capital has undertaken to vote proxies, McKinley Capital retains the final authority and responsibility for such voting subject to any specific restrictions or voting instructions by clients.

To assist in its voting process, McKinley Capital currently engages RiskMetrics Group (“RMG”), an independent service provider that specializes in providing a variety of fiduciary level proxy related services to institutional investment managers, plan sponsors, custodians, consultants, and other institutional investors. RMG also provides McKinley Capital with reports that reflect proxy voting activities for McKinley Capital’s client portfolios which provide information for appropriate monitoring of such delegated responsibilities.

RMG is generally responsible for:

• providing McKinley Capital with analytical and independent research and advice on all proxy proposals;

• notifying McKinley Capital of proxy proposals in advance of the meeting cut-off date;

• voting all proxies on behalf of McKinley Capital and individual clients (as applicable and provided for via contract);

• maintaining appropriate books and records;

• providing McKinley Capital with quarterly/annual reports; and,

• providing McKinley Capital with additional support as from time to time agreed upon.

McKinley Capital has delegated to RMG the authority to vote McKinley Capital’s clients’ proxies consistent with the established guidelines. RMG further has the authority to determine whether any extenuating specific company circumstances exist that would mandate a special consideration of the application of these voting parameters. If RMG makes such a determination, the matter will be forwarded to the CCO for review. Likewise, RMG will present to McKinley Capital any specific matters not addressed within the following parameters for consideration.

C-1

At least annually, or more often as needed, the Portfolio Management Team and CCO will review the RMG voting guidelines and suggestions for individual proposals. McKinley Capital will then, based on internal and external research and careful consideration of all applicable factors provide RMG with its general voting decisions.

Certain proxy voting issues may fall outside of McKinley Capital’s pre-established voting guidelines. RMG refers such issues to McKinley Capital for voting on a case-by-case basis. Absent material conflicts, the CCO will determine how McKinley Capital should vote the proxy in accordance with applicable voting guidelines. The Portfolio Management Team will be consulted as needed. All proposals marked as referral or case-by-case situations, will be individually reviewed and voted by McKinley Capital in a timely and appropriate manner after notification is received from RMG. Clients providing McKinley Capital with individual voting policies will be notified of any special situations if requested.

Clients that self-direct proxy voting policies should be aware that McKinley Capital may vote other client shares in a manner inconsistent with the client’s vote. In addition, foreign proxy voting notification and distribution policies and procedures may significantly differ from those that are standard for companies registered in the United States. Meeting notification and voting capability time lines may be extremely truncated and may be further exacerbated by time zones. Therefore, occasions may arise where RMG and/or McKinley Capital may not receive the proxy information with sufficient time to vote the proxies.

In addition, there are certain countries with complex legal documentation or share blocking requirements that may make it difficult, costly and/or prohibit McKinley Capital from voting a company’s proxy. McKinley Capital will, at all times, seek to vote every proxy for every applicable security and account, however there can be no guarantees that this will occur.

All unvoted proxies will be so noted in the quarterly and annual compliance reports. In order to minimize such situations, McKinley Capital will no less than annually, discuss these specific issues and alternative solutions with the proxy voting agent during periodic due diligence and annual contract renewal meetings. Records of these discussions and available options will be documented in the Proxy Books and Records files.

McKinley Capital will provide information in its Form ADV Part II, Schedule F Supplemental Information section summarizing this Proxy Voting Policy and Procedures, including a statement that clients may request information regarding how McKinley Capital voted a client’s proxies, and that clients may request a copy of these policies and procedures.

In addition to voting proxies for clients, McKinley Capital:

1) provides clients with a summary of its proxy voting policy, which includes information describing how clients may obtain a copy of this complete policy, and information regarding how specific proxies related to each respective investment account are voted. McKinley Capital provides this summary to all new clients as part of its Form ADV, Part II disclosure brochure, which is available to any clients upon request;

2) votes proxies according to its proxy voting policies and maintains records of votes for each client through RMG;

3) retains records of proxy voting for inspection by each client or governing regulatory agencies—to both determine whether the votes were consistent with policy and to determine whether all proxies were voted;

4) monitors such voting for any potential conflicts of interest and maintains systems to deal with these issues appropriately; and

5) maintains this written proxy voting policy, which may be updated and supplemented from time to time;

Although no proxy vote is considered “routine,” outlined below are general voting parameters on various types of issues when there are no extenuating circumstances, i.e., company specific reason for voting differently.

^¡ When voting on ballot items that are fairly common management sponsored initiatives, certain items are generally, although not always, voted affirmatively.

C-2

^¡ When voting items that have a potential substantive financial or best interest impact, certain items are generally not voted in support of the proposed management sponsored initiative.

^¡ Traditionally shareholder proposals have been used mainly for putting social initiatives and issues in front of management and other shareholders. Under ERISA, it is inappropriate to use (vote) plan assets to carry out such social agendas or purposes. Thus, shareholder proposals are examined closely for their relationship to the best interest of shareholders, i.e., beneficiaries, and economic impact.

Conflicts of Interest

McKinley Capital will monitor its proxy voting process for material conflicts of interest. By maintaining the above-described proxy voting process, most votes are made based on overall voting parameters rather than their application to any particular company thereby eliminating the effect of any potential conflict of interest.

Furthermore, McKinley Capital monitors its business, financial and personal relationships to determine whether any conflicts of interest exist, and will at least annually assess the impact of any conflicts of interest.

McKinley Capital may have a conflict of interest related to voting certain securities of publicly held companies to which the firm provides investment advisory services. Such instances may include but are not limited to publicly traded companies:

• on which McKinley Capital’s Board Chair, CEO or CIO also serve;

• which are clients of McKinley Capital; and/or

• with whom McKinley Capital and/or its Board and/or executive officers may have a personal or significant relationship and/or affiliation.

McKinley Capital will generally vote those proxies in the same manner, using the same processes and pre-established guidelines in place for all client accounts. Any case-by-case proposals will be individually reviewed by the CCO or designee for further consideration. In the event of a vote involving a conflict of interest that does not meet the specific outlined parameters above or requires additional company-specific decision-making, McKinley Capital will vote according to the voting recommendation of RMG. In the rare occurrence that RMG does not provide a recommendation, McKinley Capital may request client consent or rely on other external research services.

Client Requests for Information

All client requests for information regarding proxy votes, or policies and procedures, received by any employee should be forwarded to the CCO or designee.

All client requests will be responded to in writing as soon as reasonably possible. Information will include but is not limited to: the name of the issuer, the proposal voted upon, and how McKinley Capital voted the client’s proxy with respect to each proposal.

Recordkeeping

The CCO shall retain the following proxy records in accordance with the SEC’s five-year retention requirement:

1) Policies and procedures and any amendments;

2) Each proxy statement that McKinley Capital receives;

3) A record of each vote that McKinley Capital casts;

4) Any document McKinley Capital created that was material to making a decision on how to vote proxies, or that memorializes that decision including periodic reports to the CCO if applicable.

5) A copy of each written request from a client for information on how McKinley Capital voted such client’s proxies, and a copy of any written response.

C-3