XML 66 R49.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.3
HIGHER AND BETTER USE TIMBERLANDS AND REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS (Tables)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2025
Real Estate [Abstract]  
Schedule of Higher and Better Use Timberlands and Real Estate Development Investments
Changes in higher and better use timberlands and real estate development investments from December 31, 2024 to September 30, 2025 are shown below:
Higher and Better Use Timberlands and Real Estate Development Investments
 Land and Timber Development InvestmentsTotal
Non-current portion at December 31, 2024
$86,832 $22,778 $109,610 
Plus: Current portion (a)1,402 28,206 29,608 
Total Balance at December 31, 2024
88,234 50,984 139,218 
Non-cash cost of land and improved development(1,197)(24,286)(25,483)
Amortization of parcel real estate development investments— (4,210)(4,210)
Timber depletion from harvesting activities and basis of timber sold in real estate sales(1,832)— (1,832)
Capitalized real estate development investments (b)— 15,681 15,681 
Capital expenditures (silviculture)98 — 98 
Intersegment transfers9,315 — 9,315 
Other (c)(7,048)— (7,048)
Total Balance at September 30, 2025
87,570 38,169 125,739 
Less: Current portion (a)(2,491)(13,712)(16,203)
Non-current portion at September 30, 2025
$85,079 $24,457 $109,536 
(a)The current portion of Higher and Better Use Timberlands and Real Estate Development Investments is recorded in Inventory. See Note 14 — Inventory for additional information.
(b)Capitalized real estate development investments include $0.7 million of capitalized interest and $3.8 million of parcel real estate development investments. Parcel real estate development investments represent investments made for specific lots and/or commercial parcels that are currently under contract or expected to be ready for market within one year.
(c)Other includes a $7.0 million non-cash asset impairment charge recognized on certain Higher and Better Use Timberland assets located in Washington, which were acquired in the 2020 merger with Pope Resources. The Company identified indicators of impairment, principally observed decreases in the market value of the underlying real property assets. Accordingly, the Company performed a long-lived asset impairment analysis and determined that the carrying value of these assets exceeded their estimated fair value. The resulting impairment charge was measured as the amount by which the carrying value of the impaired assets exceeded their estimated fair value. The estimated fair value was determined using projected discounted future cash flows, incorporating relevant and updated market data as of the measurement date.