XML 110 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Employee retirement benefits
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Employee retirement benefits

4. Employee retirement benefits

Retirement benefits, which cover almost all retired employees and their surviving spouses, include pension income and certain health care and life insurance benefits. They are met through funded registered retirement plans and through unfunded supplementary benefits that are paid directly to recipients.

Pension income benefits consist mainly of company-paid defined benefit plans that are based on years of service and final average earnings. The company shares in the cost of health care and life insurance benefits. The company’s benefit obligations are based on the projected benefit method of valuation that includes employee service to date and present compensation levels as well as a projection of salaries to retirement.

The expense and obligations for both funded and unfunded benefits are determined in accordance with accepted actuarial practices and United States generally accepted accounting principles. The process for determining retirement-income expense and related obligations includes making certain long-term assumptions regarding the discount rate, rate of return on plan assets and rate of compensation increases. The obligation and pension expense can vary significantly with changes in the assumptions used to estimate the obligation and the expected return on plan assets. At 2013 year-end, the company adopted mortality assumptions presented in the new Canadian pensioners mortality research report, per guidance provided by the Canadian Institute of Actuaries.

 

The benefit obligations and plan assets associated with the company’s defined benefit plans are measured on December 31.

 

     Pension benefits          Other post-retirement
benefits
 
      2013     2012           2013     2012  

Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations

at December 31 (percent)

           

Discount rate

     4.75            3.75           4.75          3.75   

Long-term rate of compensation increase

     4.50        4.50             4.50        4.50   

millions of dollars

                                     

Change in projected benefit obligation

           

Projected benefit obligation at January 1

     7,336        6,646           547        508   

Current service cost

     181        160           11        8   

Interest cost

     281        288           21        21   

Actuarial loss/(gain)

     (504     616           (50     40   

Amendments

     -        -           -        -   

Benefits paid (a)

     (424     (374        (26     (30

Projected benefit obligation at December 31

     6,870        7,336             503        547   

Accumulated benefit obligation at December 31

     6,263        6,560          

The discount rate for calculating year-end post-retirement liabilities is based on the yield for high quality, long-term Canadian corporate bonds at year-end with an average maturity (or duration) approximately that of the liabilities. The measurement of the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation assumes a health care cost trend rate of 4.50 percent in 2014 and subsequent years.

 

    

Pension benefits

         Other post-retirement
benefits
 
millions of dollars    2013     2012           2013     2012  

Change in plan assets

           

Fair value at January 1

     5,114        4,461          

Actual return/(loss) on plan assets

     491        374          

Company contributions

     600        594          

Benefits paid (b)

     (333     (315       

Fair value at December 31

     5,872        5,114          

Plan assets in excess of/(less than) projected

benefit obligation at December 31

           

Funded plans

     (424     (1,602       

Unfunded plans

     (574     (620        (503     (547

Total (c)

     (998     (2,222          (503     (547
(a) Benefit payments for funded and unfunded plans.
(b) Benefit payments for funded plans only.
(c) Fair value of assets less projected benefit obligation shown above.

Funding of registered retirement plans complies with federal and provincial pension regulations, and the company makes contributions to the plans based on an independent actuarial valuation. In accordance with authoritative guidance relating to the accounting for defined pension and other post-retirement benefits plans, the underfunded status of the company’s defined benefit post-retirement plans was recorded as a liability in the balance sheet, and the changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occurred was recognized through other comprehensive income.

 

     Pension benefits          Other post-retirement
benefits
 
millions of dollars    2013     2012           2013     2012  

Amounts recorded in the consolidated balance sheet consist of:

           

Current liabilities

     (25     (24        (28     (28

Other long-term obligations

     (973     (2,198        (475     (519

Total recorded

     (998     (2,222          (503     (547

Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:

           

Net actuarial loss/(gain)

     2,303        3,210           64        124   

Prior service cost

     62        85           -        -   

Total recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, before tax

     2,365        3,295             64        124   

The company establishes the long-term expected rate of return on plan assets by developing a forward-looking long-term return assumption for each asset class, taking into account factors such as the expected real return for the specific asset class and inflation. A single, long-term rate of return is then calculated as the weighted average of the target asset allocation percentages and the long-term return assumption for each asset class. The 2013 long-term expected return of 6.25 percent used in the calculations of pension expense compares to an actual rate of return of 6.50 percent and 8.00 percent over the last 10- and 20-year periods ending December 31, 2013.

 

     Pension benefits          Other post-retirement
benefits
 
      2013     2012     2011           2013     2012     2011  

Assumptions used to determine net periodic

benefit cost for years ended December 31 (percent)

               

Discount rate

     3.75        4.25        5.50           3.75        4.25        5.50   

Long-term rate of return on funded assets

     6.25        6.25        7.00           -            -        -   

Long-term rate of compensation increase

     4.50        4.50        4.50           4.50        4.50        4.50   
               

millions of dollars

                                                     

Components of net periodic benefit cost

               

Current service cost

     181        160        122           11        8        6   

Interest cost

     281        288        314           21        21        23   

Expected return on plan assets

     (331     (288     (308        -        -        -   

Amortization of prior service cost

     23        23        21           -        -        -   

Amortization of actuarial loss/(gain)

     243        235        162           10        8        3   

Net periodic benefit cost

     397        418        311             42        37        32   

Changes in amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income

               

Net actuarial loss/(gain)

     (664     530        1,112           (50     40        81   

Amortization of net actuarial (loss)/gain included in net periodic benefit cost

     (243     (235     (162        (10     (8     (3

Prior service cost

     -        -        86           -        -        -   

Amortization of prior service cost included in net periodic benefit cost

     (23     (23     (21        -        -        -   

Total recorded in other comprehensive income

     (930     272        1,015             (60     32        78   

Total recorded in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income, before tax

     (533     690        1,326             (18     69        110   

Costs for defined contribution plans, primarily the employee savings plan, were $37 million in 2013 (2012 - $36 million, 2011 - $36 million).

A summary of the change in accumulated other comprehensive income is shown in the table below:

 

    

Total pension and other
post-retirement benefits

 
millions of dollars    2013        2012        2011  

(Charge)/credit to other comprehensive income, before tax

     990           (304        (1,093

Deferred income tax (charge)/credit (note 17)

     (256        87           279   

(Charge)/credit to other comprehensive income, after tax

     734           (217        (814

The company’s investment strategy for pension plan assets reflects a long-term view, a careful assessment of the risks inherent in various asset classes and broad diversification to reduce the risk of the portfolio. Consistent with the long-term nature of the liability, the plan assets are primarily invested in global, market-cap-weighted indexed equity and domestic indexed bond funds to diversify risk while minimizing costs. The equity funds hold Imperial Oil stock only to the extent necessary to replicate the relevant equity index. The balance of the plan assets is largely invested in high-quality corporate and government debt securities. Studies are periodically conducted to establish the preferred target asset allocation. The target asset allocation for equity securities is 46 percent. The target allocation for debt securities is 49 percent. Plan assets for the remaining 5 percent are invested in venture capital partnerships that pursue a strategy of investment in U.S. and international early stage ventures.

The 2013 fair value of the pension plan assets, including the level within the fair value hierarchy, is shown in the table below:

 

            Fair value measurements at December 31, 2013, using:  
millions of dollars    Total      Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    

Significant
unobservable
inputs

(Level 3)

 

Asset class

           

Equity securities

           

Canadian

     932            932     (a)    

Non-Canadian

     1,911            1,911     (a)    

Debt securities - Canadian

           

Corporate

     654            654     (b)    

Government

     2,161            2,161     (b)    

Asset backed

     -            

Mortgage funds

     1               1     (c) 

Equities – Venture capital

     188               188     (d) 

Cash

     25         12         13     (e)          

Total plan assets at fair value

     5,872         12         5,671         189   
(a) For company equity securities held in the form of fund units that are redeemable at the measurement date, the unit value is treated as a Level 2 input. The fair value of the securities owned by the funds is based on observable quoted prices on active exchanges, which are Level 1 inputs.
(b) For corporate, government and asset-backed debt securities, fair value is based on observable inputs of comparable market transactions.
(c) For mortgage funds, fair value represents the principal outstanding which is guaranteed by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
(d) For venture capital partnership investments, fair value is generally established by using revenue or earnings multiples or other relevant market data including Initial Public Offerings.
(e) For cash balances that are held in Level 2 funds prior to investment in those fund units, the cash value is treated as a Level 2 input.

 

The change in the fair value of Level 3 assets, which use significant unobservable inputs to measure fair value, is shown in the table below:

 

millions of dollars   

Mortgage

funds

    

Venture

capital

 

Fair value at January 1, 2013

     1         158   

Net realized gains/(losses)

     -         (17

Net unrealized gains/(losses)

     -         44   

Net purchases/(sales)

     -         3   

Fair value at December 31, 2013

     1         188   

The 2012 fair value of the pension plan assets, including the level within the fair value hierarchy, is shown in the table below:

 

            Fair value measurements at December 31, 2012, using:  
millions of dollars    Total     

Quoted prices

in active

markets for

identical assets

(Level 1)

    

Significant

other

observable

inputs

(Level 2)

   

Significant

unobservable

inputs

(Level 3)

 

Asset class

          

Equity securities

          

Canadian

     811            811     (a)   

Non-Canadian

     1,657            1,657     (a)   

Debt securities - Canadian

          

Corporate

     473            473     (b)   

Government

     1,982            1,982     (b)   

Asset backed

     5            5     (b)   

Mortgage funds

     1              1     (c) 

Equities – Venture capital

     158              158     (d) 

Cash

     27         9         18     (e)         

Total plan assets at fair value

     5,114         9         4,946            159       
(a) For company equity securities held in the form of fund units that are redeemable at the measurement date, the unit value is treated as a Level 2 input. The fair value of the securities owned by the funds is based on observable quoted prices on active exchanges, which are Level 1 inputs.
(b) For corporate, government and asset-backed debt securities, fair value is based on observable inputs of comparable market transactions.
(c) For mortgage funds, fair value represents the principal outstanding which is guaranteed by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
(d) For venture capital partnership investments, fair value is generally established by using revenue or earnings multiples or other relevant market data including Initial Public Offerings.
(e) For cash balances that are held in Level 2 funds prior to investment in those fund units, the cash value is treated as a Level 2 input.

The change in the fair value of Level 3 assets, which use significant unobservable inputs to measure fair value, is shown in the table below:

 

millions of dollars   

Mortgage

funds

     Venture
capital
 

Fair value at January 1, 2012

     1         148   

Net realized gains/(losses)

     -         (11

Net unrealized gains/(losses)

     -         8   

Net purchases/(sales)

     -         13   

Fair value at December 31, 2012

     1         158   

 

A summary of pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets is shown in the table below:

 

             Pension benefits  
millions of dollars    2013      2012  

For funded pension plans with accumulated benefit

obligations in excess of plan assets:

     

Projected benefit obligation

     -         6,716   

Accumulated benefit obligation

     -         6,025   

Fair value of plan assets

     -         5,114   

Accumulated benefit obligation less fair value of plan assets

     -         911   

For unfunded plans covered by book reserves:

     

Projected benefit obligation

     574         620   

Accumulated benefit obligation

     496         535   
Estimated 2014 amortization from accumulated other comprehensive income  
millions of dollars    Pension benefits      Other post-retirement
benefits
 

Net actuarial loss/(gain) (a)

     169         5   

Prior service cost (b)

     23         -   
(a) The company amortizes the net balance of actuarial loss/(gain) as a component of net periodic benefit cost over the average remaining service period of active plan participants.
(b) The company amortizes prior service cost on a straight-line basis.
Cash flows   
Benefit payments expected in:   

millions of dollars

   Pension benefits    

Other post-retirement

benefits

 

2014

     365        28   

2015

     375        28   

2016

     384        28   

2017

     393        28   

2018

     401        28   

2019 - 2023

     2,078        145   
In 2014, the company expects to make cash contributions of about $420 million to its pension plans.   
Sensitivities     
A one percent change in the assumptions at which retirement liabilities could be effectively settled is as follows:   

Increase/(decrease)

millions of dollars

   One percent
increase
   

One percent

decrease

 

Rate of return on plan assets:

    

Effect on net benefit cost, before tax

     (50     50   

Discount rate:

    

Effect on net benefit cost, before tax

     (80     100   

Effect on benefit obligation

     (850     1,050   

Rate of pay increases:

    

Effect on net benefit cost, before tax

     50        (45

Effect on benefit obligation

     170        (150

 

A one percent change in the assumed health-care cost trend rate would have the following effects:

 

Increase/(decrease)

millions of dollars

   One percent
increase
       One percent
decrease
 

Effect on service and interest cost components

     4           (3

Effect on benefit obligation

     45           (35