XML 28 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Jan. 02, 2016
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

As a result of the required annual impairment assessment performed in the fourth quarter of 2015, the Corporation determined the fair value of a recently acquired reporting unit within the office furniture segment was below its carrying value. The decline in the estimated fair value of this reporting unit was largely driven by lower than expected operating performance in 2015. The projections used in the impairment model reflected management's assumptions regarding revenue growth rates, economic and market trends, cost structure, investments required for sales force and operational transformation and other expectations about the anticipated short-term and long-term operating results of the reporting unit. Based on the two-step analysis, the Corporation recorded a $3.0 million goodwill impairment charge in 2015, and there was no remaining net goodwill in the reporting unit as of January 2, 2016. Additionally and prior to the goodwill impairment assessment, the Corporation tested the recoverability of the long-lived assets in that reporting unit, other than goodwill, which included definite-lived intangible assets consisting of customer lists and trade names, and recorded an impairment charge of $8.3 million.  

Based on the results of the annual impairment tests, the Corporation concluded that no other goodwill impairment existed apart from the impairment charges discussed above. For all other reporting units included in the annual two-step impairment test except the two noted below, the estimated fair value is significantly in excess of carrying value.

For one of the office furniture reporting units that exceeded its carrying value by approximately 12.9 percent, the Corporation assumed a discount rate of 13.0 percent, near term growth rates ranging from 3.5 percent to 7.5 percent and a terminal growth rate of 3.0 percent. The fair value model assumes continued positive economic momentum and transformation of the reporting unit including sales and marketing initiatives, new product development and operational processes. Holding other assumptions constant a 100 basis point increase in the discount rate would result in a $5.0 million decrease in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit and a 100 basis point decrease in the long-term growth rate would result in a $2.0 million decrease in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. Neither of these scenarios individually would result in the reporting unit failing step one.

For the other office furniture reporting unit that exceeded its carrying value by approximately 17.8 percent, the Corporation assumed a discount rate of 15.0 percent, near term growth rates ranging from negative 10.7 percent to positive 8.0 percent and a terminal growth rate of 4.0 percent. The fair value model assumes continued positive economic momentum and transformation of the reporting unit including sales and marketing initiatives, new product development and operational processes. Holding other assumptions constant a 100 basis point increase in the discount rate would result in a $5.0 million decrease in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit and a 100 basis point decrease in the long-term growth rate would result in a $2.5 million decrease in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. Neither of these scenarios individually would result in the reporting unit failing step one.

The Corporation also owns certain trademarks and trade names having a carrying value of $41.0 million as of January 2, 2016, $41.0 million as of January 3, 2015, and $41.0 million as of December 28, 2013.  These trademarks and trade names are deemed to have indefinite useful lives because they are expected to generate cash flows indefinitely. As a result of the review performed in the fourth quarter of 2015, the Corporation determined the fair value of all trade names exceeded the respective carrying value and, therefore no impairment was recorded.

One trade name within the office furniture segment had a minimal amount of headroom on its valuation. This trade name exceeded its carrying value by approximately $1.0 million and had a carrying value of $11.2 million. For this trade name the Corporation assumed a discount rate of 12.0 percent, terminal growth rate of 3.0 percent and a royalty rate of 2.5 percent. Holding other assumptions constant, a nominal change in the discount rate or royalty rate could trigger an impairment.

The table below summarizes amortizable definite-lived intangible assets, which are reflected in Other Assets in the Corporation’s Consolidated Balance Sheets:

 
 
January 2, 2016
 
January 3, 2015
(In thousands)
 
Gross
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
 
Gross
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net
Patents
 
$
18,645

 
$
18,615

 
$
30

 
$
18,945

 
$
18,724

 
$
221

Software
 
122,892

 
21,193

 
101,699

 
93,343

 
17,711

 
75,632

Trademarks and trade names
 
6,564

 
753

 
5,811

 
11,424

 
1,724

 
9,700

Customer lists and other
 
105,586

 
60,063

 
45,523

 
113,671

 
58,019

 
55,652

Net definite lived intangible assets
 
$
253,687

 
$
100,624

 
$
153,063

 
$
237,383

 
$
96,178

 
$
141,205



The Corporation recorded an impairment charge of $8.3 million to adjust the customer list and trade names associated with a small office furniture reporting unit to fair market value as discussed above.

Amortization expense for capitalized software for 2015, 2014 and 2013, was $3.5 million, $3.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively. Amortization expense for all other definite-lived intangibles for 2015, 2014 and 2013, was $7.6 million, $7.2 million and $7.4 million, respectively. All amortization expense was recorded in Selling and Administrative Expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.  Based on the current amount of intangible assets subject to amortization, the estimated amortization expense for each of the following five fiscal years is as follows:

(in millions)
2016

 
2017

 
2018

 
2019

 
2020

Amortization expense
$
11.6

 
$
17.6

 
$
17.8

 
$
17.1

 
$
16.5



The occurrence of events such as acquisitions, dispositions or impairments in the future may result in changes to amounts.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill since December 28, 2013, are as follows by reporting segment:
 
(In thousands)
Office
Furniture
 
Hearth
Products
 
Total
Balance as of December 28, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
$
149,969

 
$
166,188

 
$
316,157

Accumulated impairment losses
(29,359
)
 
(143
)
 
(29,502
)
 
120,610

 
166,045

 
286,655

Goodwill acquired during the year

 
15,713

 
15,713

Impairment losses
(22,802
)
 

 
(22,802
)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(256
)
 

 
(256
)
Balance as of January 3, 2015
 

 
 

 
 

Goodwill
149,713

 
181,901

 
331,614

Accumulated impairment losses
(52,161
)
 
(143
)
 
(52,304
)
 
97,552

 
181,758

 
279,310

Impairment losses
(2,963
)
 

 
(2,963
)
Final purchase price allocations/contingent payments from prior year acquisitions

 
1,298

 
1,298

Foreign currency translation adjustment
5

 

 
5

Balance as of January 2, 2016
 

 
 

 
 

Goodwill
149,718

 
183,199

 
332,917

Accumulated impairment losses
(55,124
)
 
(143
)
 
(55,267
)
 
94,594

 
183,056

 
277,650



The goodwill increases relate to acquisitions completed.  See the Business Combinations note.  The decreases in goodwill in the office furniture segment in 2014 and 2015 were due to the impairment charges described above.