XML 37 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Loss Contingency [Abstract]  
Contingencies
Contingencies

We are a party to various litigation and legal proceedings which we believe, based on advice of counsel, will not either individually or in the aggregate have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We filed a business interruption claim with our insurance carriers related to a fire at our Woods Cross Refinery that occurred in the first quarter 2018. As of June 30, 2020, we have collected interim payments totaling $56.0 million, but have not reached a final agreement regarding the amounts owed to us pursuant to our business interruption coverage. We have accounted for this claim as a gain contingency and accordingly, we have deferred revenue recognition for the interim payments received until such time that uncertainties regarding the amounts owed to us have been resolved.

During 2017, 2018 and 2019, the EPA granted the Cheyenne Refinery and Woods Cross Refinery each a one-year small refinery exemption from the Renewable Fuel Standard (“RFS”) program requirements for the 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively, calendar years. As a result, the Cheyenne Refinery’s and Woods Cross Refinery’s gasoline and diesel production are not subject to the Renewable Volume Obligation for the respective years. Upon each exemption granted, we increased our inventory of RINs and reduced our cost of products sold.

In 2019, various subsidiaries of HollyFrontier moved to intervene in four lawsuits brought by renewable fuel interest groups against the EPA in federal courts alleging violations of the RFS under the Clean Air Act and challenging the EPA’s handling of small refinery exemptions. We intervened to vigorously defend the EPA’s position on small refinery exemptions because we believe the EPA correctly applied applicable law to the matters at issue. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit dismissed one of these four lawsuits on November 12, 2019 for lack of jurisdiction. On January 24, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacated the small refinery exemptions granted to two of our refineries for 2016 and remanded the case to the EPA for further proceedings. On March 24, 2020, various subsidiaries of HollyFrontier filed a Petition for Rehearing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. On April 7, 2020, the Tenth Circuit denied our request to reconsider its decision, and on April 15, 2020, the Tenth Circuit entered its mandate, remanding the matter back to the EPA. It is not clear at this time what steps the EPA will take with respect to our 2016 small refinery exemptions, and we are unable to estimate the costs we may incur, if any, at this time. It is also not clear how the case will impact future small refinery exemptions. It is too early to assess whether the remaining two cases are expected to have any impact on us.