Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Loss Contingency [Abstract]
Contingencies	Contingencies We are a party to various litigation and legal proceedings which we believe, based on advice of counsel, will not either individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. We have a crude oil supply contract that requires the supplier to deliver a specified volume of crude oil or pay a shortfall fee for the difference in the actual barrels delivered to us less the specified barrels per the supply contract. For the contract year ended August 31, 2017, the actual number of barrels delivered to us was substantially less than the specified barrels, and we recorded a reduction to cost of goods sold and accumulated a shortfall fee receivable of $26.0 million during this period. In September 2017, the supplier notified us they are disputing the shortfall fee owed and in October 2017 notified us of their demand for arbitration. We offset the receivable with payments of invoices for deliveries of crude oil received subsequent to August 31, 2017, which is permitted under the supply contract. We believe the disputes and claims made by the supplier are without merit. In March, 2006, a subsidiary of ours sold the assets of Montana Refining Company under an Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”). Calumet Montana Refining LLC, the current owner of the assets, has submitted requests for reimbursement of approximately $20.0 million pursuant to contractual indemnity provisions under the APA for various costs incurred. Calumet has also asserted claims related to environmental matters. We have rejected most of the claims for payment, and selected issues were arbitrated in July 2018. The arbitration panel is expected to rule on the selected issues this fall after additional briefing is submitted to the panel. We have accrued the costs we believe are owed pursuant to the APA, and we estimate that any reasonably possible losses beyond the amounts accrued are not material.

Contingencies

We are a party to various litigation and legal proceedings which we believe, based on advice of counsel, will not either individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We have a crude oil supply contract that requires the supplier to deliver a specified volume of crude oil or pay a shortfall fee for the difference in the actual barrels delivered to us less the specified barrels per the supply contract. For the contract year ended August 31, 2017, the actual number of barrels delivered to us was substantially less than the specified barrels, and we recorded a reduction to cost of goods sold and accumulated a shortfall fee receivable of $26.0 million during this period. In September 2017, the supplier notified us they are disputing the shortfall fee owed and in October 2017 notified us of their demand for arbitration. We offset the receivable with payments of invoices for deliveries of crude oil received subsequent to August 31, 2017, which is permitted under the supply contract. We believe the disputes and claims made by the supplier are without merit.

In March, 2006, a subsidiary of ours sold the assets of Montana Refining Company under an Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”). Calumet Montana Refining LLC, the current owner of the assets, has submitted requests for reimbursement of approximately $20.0 million pursuant to contractual indemnity provisions under the APA for various costs incurred. Calumet has also asserted claims related to environmental matters. We have rejected most of the claims for payment, and selected issues were arbitrated in July 2018. The arbitration panel is expected to rule on the selected issues this fall after additional briefing is submitted to the panel. We have accrued the costs we believe are owed pursuant to the APA, and we estimate that any reasonably possible losses beyond the amounts accrued are not material.