XML 35 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Goodwill and Long-lived Asset Impairment
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Goodwill [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Long-lived Asset Impairment
Goodwill and Long-lived Asset Impairment

As of December 31, 2017, our goodwill balance was $2.2 billion. During 2017, we recognized $194.8 million in goodwill as a result of our PCLI acquisition. Also during 2017, HEP recognized $21.6 million in goodwill as a result of the acquisition of HEP's remaining interests in SLC Pipeline and Frontier Pipeline. See Note 20 for additional information on our segments. The carrying amount of our goodwill may fluctuate from period to period due to the effects of foreign currency translation adjustments on goodwill assigned to our Lubricants and Specialty Products segment.

The following is a summary of our goodwill by segment:
 
 
Refining
 
Lubricants and Specialty Products
 
HEP
 
Total
 
 
(In thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
 
$
2,042,790

 
$

 
$
288,991

 
$
2,331,781

Accumulated impairment losses
 
(309,318
)
 

 

 
(309,318
)
 
 
1,733,472

 

 
288,991

 
2,022,463

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Additional goodwill acquired
 

 
194,760

 
21,619

 
216,379

Foreign currency translation adjustment
 

 
5,902

 

 
5,902

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
 
2,042,790

 
200,662

 
310,610

 
2,554,062

Accumulated impairment losses
 
(309,318
)
 

 

 
(309,318
)
 
 
$
1,733,472

 
$
200,662

 
$
310,610

 
$
2,244,744



We performed our annual goodwill impairment testing as of July 1, 2017 and determined the fair value of our El Dorado reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 10%. A reasonable expectation exists that future deterioration in gross margins could result in an impairment of goodwill and the long-lived assets of the El Dorado reporting unit as some point in the future and such impairment charges could be material. Additionally, qualitative testing indicated no impairment of goodwill attributable to our other reporting units.

During the second quarter of 2017, we incurred long-lived asset impairment charges totaling $23.2 million, including $19.2 million of construction-in-progress consisting primarily of engineering work for a planned expansion of our Woods Cross refinery to add lubricants production capabilities. During the second quarter of 2017, we concluded to no longer pursue this expansion for various reasons including our recent acquisition of PCLI. The remaining $4.0 million in charges relate to property, plant and equipment that we expensed in the form of accelerated depreciation in the income statement. Additionally, as a result of our impairment testing in the second quarter of 2016, we determined that the carrying value of the long-lived assets of the Cheyenne Refinery had been impaired and recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of $344.8 million that principally related to properties, plant and equipment.

During the second quarter of 2016, we performed interim goodwill impairment and related long-lived asset impairment testing of our El Dorado and Cheyenne Refinery reporting units after identifying a combination of events and circumstances that are indicators
of potential goodwill and long-lived asset impairment. The indicators included lower than typical gross margins during the summer driving season, a decrease in the gross margin outlook and decrease in our market capitalization due to a decline in our common share price. Our testing first assessed the carrying values of our refining long-lived asset groups for recoverability. This entailed a comparison of our reporting unit fair values relative to their respective carrying values. If carrying value exceeds fair value for a reporting unit, we measure goodwill impairment as the excess of the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill based on estimates of the fair value of all assets and liabilities in the reporting unit. The estimated fair values of our goodwill reporting units and long-lived asset groups were derived using a combination of both income and market approaches. The income approach reflects expected future cash flows based on estimates of future crack spreads, forecasted production levels, operating costs and capital expenditures. Our market approaches include both the guideline public company and guideline transaction methods. Both methods utilize pricing multiples derived from historical market transactions of other like-kind assets. These fair value measurements involve significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs). As a result of our impairment testing during the second quarter of 2016, we determined that the carrying value of the Cheyenne Refinery’s goodwill was fully impaired and a goodwill impairment charge of $309.3 million was recorded, representing all of the goodwill allocated to our Cheyenne Refinery. Our interim testing in 2016 did not identify any impairment related to our El Dorado reporting unit.

There were no impairments of goodwill or long-lived assets during the year ended December 31, 2015.