2.4.0.82102100 - Disclosure - Recently Issued Accounting Standardstruefalsefalse1false falsefalseD2013Q4YTDhttp://www.sec.gov/CIK0000046640duration2012-04-30T00:00:002013-04-28T00:00:001true 1hnz_RecentlyIssuedAccountingStandardsAbstracthnz_falsenadurationfalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalse1falsefalsefalse00falsefalsefalsexbrli:stringItemTypestringfalse0Recently Issued Accounting Standards [Abstract]2false 2us-gaap_ScheduleOfNewAccountingPronouncementsAndChangesInAccountingPrinciplesTextBlockus-gaap_truenadurationfalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalseterseLabel1falsefalsefalse00<div style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:10pt;"><div style="line-height:120%;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;font-weight:bold;">Recently Issued Accounting Standards</font></div><div style="line-height:120%;padding-left:48px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;"><br clear="none"/></font></div><div style="line-height:120%;text-align:justify;text-indent:30px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;">In February 2013, the FASB issued an amendment to the comprehensive income standard to improve the transparency of reporting reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income/loss. Other comprehensive income/loss includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income/loss into net income. The amendments do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income/loss in financial statements. The new amendments will require the Company to present the effects on income statement line items of certain significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income/loss, and cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for certain other reclassification items. The Company will adopt this revised standard in the first quarter of Fiscal 2014. The adoption of this revised standard will not impact our results of operations or financial position.</font></div><div style="line-height:120%;text-align:justify;padding-left:48px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;"><br clear="none"/></font></div><div style="line-height:120%;text-align:justify;text-indent:30px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;">In July 2012, the FASB issued an amendment to the indefinite-lived intangibles impairment standard. This revised standard is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of testing indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill for impairment by providing entities with the option to first assess qualitatively whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. An entity is not required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. An entity can choose to perform the qualitative assessment on none, some, or all of its indefinite-lived intangible assets. Moreover, an entity can by-pass the qualitative assessment and perform the quantitative impairment test for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period. The Company early adopted this amendment in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2013 for use in the Fiscal 2013 annual impairment testing. The adoption of this revised standard did not impact our results of operations or financial position.</font></div><div style="line-height:120%;text-align:justify;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;"><br clear="none"/></font></div><div style="line-height:120%;text-align:justify;text-indent:30px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;">In December 2011, the FASB issued an amendment on disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities.&#160; The new disclosure requirements mandate that entities disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The Company is required to adopt this amendment on the first day of Fiscal 2014, and this adoption will only impact the notes to the financial statements and not the financial results. The Company did not expect a significant impact to its disclosure requirements from this amendment. </font></div><div style="line-height:120%;text-align:justify;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;"><br clear="none"/></font></div><div style="line-height:120%;padding-bottom:13px;text-align:justify;text-indent:30px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;">In September 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the disclosure requirements for multiemployer pension plans. This amendment requires an employer who participates in multiemployer pension plans to provide additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures to help financial statement users better understand the plans in which an employer participates, the level of the employer's participation in the plans, and the financial health of significant plans. The disclosures also will enable users of financial information to obtain additional information outside of the financial statements. The amendment does not change the current recognition and measurement guidance for an employer's participation in a multiemployer plan. The Company adopted this amendment in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2012 and applied the provisions of this amendment retrospectively. The adoption of this amendment did not impact the notes to the consolidated financial statements or the financial results. </font></div><div style="line-height:120%;padding-left:4px;text-align:justify;text-indent:30px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;">In September 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the goodwill impairment standard. This amendment is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual impairment test by providing entities with the option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. An entity can choose to perform the qualitative assessment on none, some, or all of its reporting units. Moreover, an entity can bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to step one of the impairment test, and then perform a qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. The Company adopted this amendment in Fiscal 2012. This amendment does not impact our results of operations or financial position. </font></div><div style="line-height:120%;text-align:justify;padding-left:24px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;"><br clear="none"/></font></div><div style="line-height:120%;text-align:justify;text-indent:30px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;">In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment on the presentation of comprehensive income. This amendment is intended to improve comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. This amendment eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. Under this amendment, an entity can elect to present items of net income and other comprehensive income in one continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive, statements. The statement(s) would need to be presented with equal prominence as the other primary financial statements. While the options for presenting other comprehensive income change under this amendment, many items will not change. Those items remaining the same include the items that constitute net income and other comprehensive income; when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income; and the earnings-per-share computation. The Company adopted this amendment retrospectively on the first day of Fiscal 2013 by presenting other comprehensive income and its components as a separate financial statement. This adoption only impacted the presentation of the Company's financial statements, not the financial results. </font></div><div style="line-height:120%;padding-top:9px;text-align:justify;text-indent:32px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;">In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to revise the wording used to describe the requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For many of the requirements, the FASB does not intend for the amendments to result in a change in the application of the current requirements. Some of the amendments clarify the FASB&#8217;s intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements, such as specifying that the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise in a fair value measurement are relevant only when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets. Other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements such as specifying that, in the absence of a Level&#160;1 input (refer to Note&#160;11 for additional information), a reporting entity should apply premiums or discounts when market participants would do so when pricing the asset or liability. The Company adopted this amendment on the first day of the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2012 and this adoption did not have an impact on the Company's financial statements.</font></div><div style="line-height:120%;padding-top:9px;text-align:justify;text-indent:32px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;">In December 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to the disclosure requirements for Business Combinations. This amendment clarifies that if a public entity is required to disclose pro forma information for business combinations, the entity should disclose such pro forma information as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This amendment also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures for business combinations to include a description of the nature and amount of material nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The Company adopted this amendment on the first day of Fiscal 2012 and will apply such amendment for any business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis if and when they occur.</font></div><div style="line-height:120%;padding-top:9px;text-align:justify;text-indent:32px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;">In December 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting requirements for Goodwill and Other Intangibles. This amendment modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with </font><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;color:#000000;text-decoration:none;">zero</font><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;"> or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that impairment may exist. The Company adopted this amendment on the first day of Fiscal 2012. This adoption did not have an impact on the Company&#8217;s financial statements.</font></div></div>falsefalsefalsenonnum:textBlockItemTypenaTabular disclosure of changes in accounting principles, including adoption of new accounting pronouncements, that describes the new methods, amount and effects on financial statement line items.Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 154 -Paragraph 2, 17, 18 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-X (SX) -Number 210 -Section 01 -Paragraph b -Subparagraph 6 -Article 10 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 270 -SubTopic 10 -Section 45 -Paragraph 12 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6372559&loc=d3e725-108305 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 270 -SubTopic 10 -Section 45 -Paragraph 13 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6372559&loc=d3e765-108305 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher AICPA -Name Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) -Number 28 -Paragraph 23, 24 -LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy. Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 250 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6801783&loc=d3e22499-107794 Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 250 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6801783&loc=d3e22580-107794 Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Glossary Accounting Change -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6503790 Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Glossary Direct Effects of a Change in Accounting Principle -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6510796 Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Glossary Indirect Effects of a Change in Accounting Principle -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6515603 Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Glossary Change in Accounting Principle -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6507316 Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 270 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.10-01.(b)(6)) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6958853&loc=d3e46468-122699 Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 250 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 3 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6801783&loc=d3e22583-107794 Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Glossary Retrospective Application -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6523989 false0Recently Issued Accounting StandardsfalseRecently Issued Accounting StandardsUnKnownUnKnownUnKnownUnKnowntruefalsefalseSheethttp://www.heinz.com/role/RecentlyIssuedAccountingStandards12