XML 53 R41.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements (Details 2) (Level 3 [Member])
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Withdrawal Utilization [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Positive or negative relationship of change in input to change in fair value measurement Increase [1],[2]
Withdrawal Utilization [Member] | Maximum [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Range of Values-Unobservable Inputs 100.00% [1]
Withdrawal Utilization [Member] | Minimum [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Range of Values-Unobservable Inputs 20.00% [1]
Withdrawal Rates [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Positive or negative relationship of change in input to change in fair value measurement Increase [1],[2]
Withdrawal Rates [Member] | Maximum [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Range of Values-Unobservable Inputs 8.00% [1]
Withdrawal Rates [Member] | Minimum [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Range of Values-Unobservable Inputs 0.00% [1]
Annuitization utilization [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Positive or negative relationship of change in input to change in fair value measurement Increase [2],[3]
Annuitization utilization [Member] | Maximum [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Range of Values-Unobservable Inputs 100.00% [3]
Annuitization utilization [Member] | Minimum [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Range of Values-Unobservable Inputs 0.00% [3]
Lapse Rates [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Positive or negative relationship of change in input to change in fair value measurement Decrease [2],[4]
Lapse Rates [Member] | Maximum [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Range of Values-Unobservable Inputs 75.00% [4]
Lapse Rates [Member] | Minimum [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Range of Values-Unobservable Inputs 0.00% [4]
Reset Elections [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Positive or negative relationship of change in input to change in fair value measurement Increase [2],[5]
Reset Elections [Member] | Maximum [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Range of Values-Unobservable Inputs 75.00% [5]
Reset Elections [Member] | Minimum [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Range of Values-Unobservable Inputs 20.00% [5]
Equity Volatility [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Positive or negative relationship of change in input to change in fair value measurement Increase [2],[6]
Equity Volatility [Member] | Maximum [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Range of Values-Unobservable Inputs 50.00% [6]
Equity Volatility [Member] | Minimum [Member]
 
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]  
Range of Values-Unobservable Inputs 10.00% [6]
[1] Ranges represent assumed cumulative percentages of policyholders taking withdrawals and the annual amounts withdrawn.
[2] Conversely, the impact of a decrease in input would have the opposite impact to the fair value as that presented in the table.
[3] For reinsurance associated with Japan GMIB, range represents assumed cumulative percentages of policyholders annuitizing variable annuity contracts.
[4] Range represents assumed annual percentages of full surrender of the underlying variable annuity contracts across all policy durations for in force business.
[5] Range represents assumed cumulative percentages of policyholders that would elect to reset their guaranteed benefit base.
[6] Range represents implied market volatilities for equity indices based on multiple pricing sources.