XML 24 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Derivatives
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Derivatives [Abstract] 
Derivatives
3. Derivatives

Risk Management Objectives of Using Derivatives

We are exposed to certain risks arising from business operations and economic conditions. We attempt to manage our exposure to a wide variety of business and operational risks principally through management of our core business activities. We attempt to manage economic risk, including interest rate, liquidity and credit risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources and duration of our debt financing and, at certain times, the use of interest rate swap agreements. Specifically, we enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate exposure with the following objectives:

 

   

managing current and forecasted interest rate risk while maintaining financial flexibility and solvency;

 

   

proactively managing our cost of capital to ensure that we can effectively manage operations and execute our business strategy, thereby maintaining a competitive advantage and enhancing shareholder value; and

 

   

complying with applicable covenant requirements and restrictions.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

In using interest rate derivatives, our objectives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, we primarily use interest rate swap agreements as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for our making fixed-rate payments over the life of the applicable agreement, without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Under the terms of our senior credit facility, we were required to fix the interest rate on at least 50.0% of the outstanding balance thereunder through March 19, 2010. Since that date, we have not been required to fix, and have not fixed, interest rates on any amounts outstanding thereunder.

During 2007, we entered into three swap agreements to convert $465.0 million of our variable rate debt under our senior credit facility to fixed rate debt. These interest rate swap agreements expired on April 3, 2010, and they were our only derivatives in effect during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010. We did not have any swap agreements in effect during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011. Upon entering into the swap agreements, we designated them as hedges of variability of our variable rate interest payments attributable to changes in three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), the designated interest rate. Therefore, these interest rate swap agreements were, prior to their respective expiration dates, considered cash flow hedges.

Under these swap agreements, we received variable rate interest at LIBOR and paid interest at a fixed annual rate of 5.48%. The variable LIBOR was reset in three-month periods under the swap agreements.

Upon entering into these swap agreements, we documented our hedging relationships and our risk management objectives. Our swap agreements did not include written options. Our swap agreements were intended solely to modify the payments for a recognized liability from a variable rate to a fixed rate. Our swap agreements did not qualify for the short-cut method of accounting because the variable rate debt being hedged was pre-payable.

Hedge effectiveness was evaluated at the end of each quarter. We compared the notional amount, the variable interest rate and the settlement dates of the interest rate swap agreements to the hedged portion of the debt. Our swap agreements were highly effective at hedging our interest rate exposure.

During the term of each interest rate swap agreement, we recognized such swap agreements at their fair value as an asset or liability on our balance sheet. The effective portion of the change in the fair value of our interest rate swap agreements was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives was recognized directly in earnings (loss).

Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivatives were reclassified to interest expense as the related interest payments were made on our variable rate debt.

We did not have any derivatives in effect as of September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.

The following table presents the effect of our derivative financial instruments on our consolidated statements of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

 

      00000000000       00000000000       00000000000       00000000000  
    Cash Flow Hedging Relationships for the  
    Three Months Ended
September 30,
    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
    2011     2010     2011     2010  

Interest rate swap agreements:

                               

Liability at beginning of period

    $ -          $ -          $ -          $ (6,344)    
         

Effective portion of gains recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)

    -          -          -          (5,936)    
         

Effective portion of losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and reclassified into interest expense

    -          -          -          12,280     
         
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
         

Liability at end of period

    $ -          $ -          $ -          $ -     
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, we recorded income on derivatives as other comprehensive income of $3.9 million, net of a $2.5 million income tax expense.