2.2.0.7 false Income Taxes 0214 - Disclosure - Income Taxes true false false false 1 USD false false Shares Standard http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance shares xbrli 0 USD Standard http://www.xbrl.org/2003/iso4217 USD iso4217 0 USDEPS Divide http://www.xbrl.org/2003/iso4217 USD iso4217 http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance shares xbrli 0 Pure Standard http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance pure xbrli 0 $ 2 Income Taxes [Abstract] 0 us-gaap_IncomeTaxExpenseBenefitAbstract us-gaap true na duration No definition available. false false false false false true false false false false false false 1 false false false false 0 0 false false false xbrli:stringItemType string No definition available. false 3 Income Taxes 1 us-gaap_IncomeTaxDisclosureTextBlock us-gaap true na duration No definition available. false false false false false false false false false false false verboselabel false 1 false false false false 0 0   <div style="font-family: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif"> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 12pt"><b>Note 14. Income Taxes</b> </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was 27.7%. Significant items that impacted the Company’s effective tax rate as compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% included a tax benefit related to the favorable resolution of U.S. federal tax legislation uncertainties existing at the acquisition date of CTG which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 4 percentage points, earnings in foreign jurisdictions taxed at rates different from the statutory U.S. federal rate which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 3 percentage points, foreign and domestic tax credits and benefits related to domestic manufacturing which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 5 percentage points, deemed repatriation of non-U.S. earnings which increased the effective tax rate by approximately 1 percentage point, state income taxes (net of related federal tax benefit) which increased the effective tax rate by approximately 1 percentage point and adjustments to reserves for tax contingencies, including interest thereon (net of related tax benefit), which increased the effective tax rate by approximately 2 percentage points. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was 24%. Significant items that impacted the Company’s effective tax rate as compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% included foreign and domestic tax credits which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 8 percentage points, earnings in foreign jurisdictions taxed at rates different from the statutory U.S. federal rate which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 4 percentage points and state income taxes (net of related federal tax benefit) which increased the effective tax rate by approximately 2 percentage points. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company reported an effective tax rate of 32.2%, including a charge of approximately $10 million due to the enactment of health care reform legislation in the U.S., which increased the effective tax rate by approximately 2 percentage points and domestic tax credits and benefits related to domestic manufacturing which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 3 percentage points. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company reported an effective tax rate of 25.8%, including domestic tax credits which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 5 percentage points and benefits from an adjustment to state taxes which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 2 percentage points. </div> <div align="left" style="font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 6pt">At September 30, 2010, the Company had a $308.9 million liability recorded for unrecognized tax benefits, which included interest and penalties of $153.2 million. The total amount of unrecognized benefits that, if recognized, would have affected the effective tax rate was $233 million. At December 31, 2009, the Company had a $286.6 million liability recorded for unrecognized tax benefits, which included interest and penalties of $148.6 million. The total amount of unrecognized benefits that, if recognized, would have affected the effective tax rate was $210.3 million. The Company reported interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. </div>   </div>  <div style="font-family: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif"> </div>  <!-- Begin Block Tagged Note false false false us-types:textBlockItemType textblock Description containing the entire income tax disclosure. Examples include net deferred tax liability or asset recognized in an enterprise's statement of financial position, net change during the year in the total valuation allowance, approximate tax effect of each type of temporary difference and carryforward that gives rise to a significant portion of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets, utilization of a tax carryback, and tax uncertainties information. This element may be used as a single block of text to encapsulate the entire disclosure including data and tables. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-X (SX) -Number 210 -Section 08 -Paragraph h -Article 4 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 109 -Paragraph 136, 172 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) -Number 109 -Paragraph 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 false 1 2 false UnKnown UnKnown UnKnown false true