XML 19 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND GENERAL

 

Nature of Business

 

Industrial Services of America, Inc. (a Florida corporation) and its subsidiaries ("ISA" or the "Company")  buys, processes and markets ferrous and non-ferrous metals and other recyclable commodities at four Kentucky and Indiana locations. Additionally, ISA operates one Pick.Pull.Save used automobile parts yard. All of these activities operate under the Company's Recycling Segment.  

 

The Company's core business is now focused on the metal recycling industry. During 2016, the Company announced that the Company formed a special committee of independent board members to evaluate various growth and strategic options. During the first quarter of 2017, the special committee concluded its work and reported to the Board. The Board accepted the special committee's recommendation to focus on returning the core recycling business to profitability. The Company intends to do this by increasing efficiencies and productivity, which included the commercial restart of the Company's auto shredder in the second quarter of 2017, which had been previously idled in 2015.  The Company intends to run the auto shredder in the normal course of business subject to market conditions and operating needs. ISA will also evaluate other various options and remain alert for possible strategic partnerships, joint ventures and mergers/acquisitions.

 

In connection with the evaluation of strategic alternatives, on September 30, 2016, the Company and Algar, Inc. ("Algar") mutually agreed to terminate the Management Services Agreement between them dated as of December 1, 2013 (the "Management Agreement"), pursuant to the Agreement to Terminate Management Services among the Company, Algar, and Sean Garber dated as of September 30, 2016 (the "Termination Agreement"). See Note 9 - Related Party Transactions for further details.  Effective September 30, 2016, Mr. Garber resigned from all positions with the Company, including as President. Also, on September 30, 2016, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer was appointed to serve in the additional role as President. 

  

Liquidity Risk Factors

  

Management believes it will have adequate liquidity for at least one year beyond the date this Form 10-K is issued. This determination is based on improved operating results during 2017, operating and cash flow projections for 2018 and 2019, and the amended credit facility with MidCap Business Credit LLC ("MidCap") which extended the contractual maturity date to February 28, 2020 and increased the borrowing availability as described in Note 3 - Long-term Debt and Notes Payable to Bank.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

The Company recognizes revenue from processed ferrous and non-ferrous scrap metal sales when title passes to the customer, which generally is upon delivery of the related materials. The Company also recognizes revenue on auto parts when title passes to the customer.  

 

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The Company carries certain of its financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value. Long-term debt is carried at cost, and the fair value is disclosed herein. In addition, the Company measures certain assets, such as long-lived assets, at fair value on a non-recurring basis to evaluate those assets for potential impairment. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

 

In accordance with applicable accounting standards, the Company categorizes its financial assets and liabilities into the following fair value hierarchy:

 

Level 1 Financial assets and liabilities with values based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market. Examples of Level 1 financial instruments include active exchange-traded securities.

 

Level 2 Financial assets and liabilities with values based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Examples of Level 2 financial instruments include various types of interest-rate and commodity-based derivative instruments, and various types of fixed-income investment securities. Pricing models are utilized to estimate fair value for certain financial assets and liabilities categorized in Level 2.

 

Level 3 Financial assets and liabilities with values based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable in the market and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect management’s judgment about the assumptions that a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability, and are based on the best available information, some of which is internally developed.

 

When determining the fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and consider assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. When possible, ISA looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets or liabilities. When identical assets and liabilities are not traded in active markets, the Company looks to market observable data for similar assets and liabilities. Nevertheless, certain assets and liabilities are not actively traded in observable markets, and the Company uses alternative valuation techniques to derive fair value measurements.

 

The Company uses the fair value methodology outlined in the related accounting standards to value the assets and liabilities for cash and debt. All of the Company's cash is defined as Level 1 and all debt is defined as Level 2.

 

In accordance with this guidance, the following tables represent the fair value hierarchy for Level 1 and Level 2 financial instruments, in thousands, at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

 

 

 

Fair Value at Reporting Date Using

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets

 

Significant Other Observable Inputs

 

 

2017:

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Total

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

841

 

 

$

 

 

$

841

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

 

$

 

 

$

(5,018

)

 

$

(5,018

)

Long-term debt, related parties

 

 

 

 

 

(1,331

)

 

 

(1,331

)

 

 

Fair Value at Reporting Date Using

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets

 

Significant Other Observable Inputs

 

 

2016:

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Total

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

526

 

 

$

 

 

$

526

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

 

$

 

 

$

(2,942

)

  

$

(2,942

)

Long-term debt, related parties

 


 

 


(1,171

)

 


(1,171

)

 

The Company had no transfers in or out of Levels 1 or 2 fair value measurements. We have had no activity in Level 3, fair value measurements for the years ended December 31, 2017 or 2016.

 

Estimates

 

In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP"), management must make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported for assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as affecting the disclosures provided. Examples of estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts, estimates of realizability of deferred income tax assets and liabilities, estimates of inventory balances and values, and estimates of stock option and warrant values. The Company also uses estimates when assessing fair values of assets and liabilities acquired in business acquisitions as well as any fair value and any related impairment charges related to the carrying value of inventory and machinery and equipment, and other long-lived assets. Despite the Company’s intention to establish accurate estimates and use reasonable assumptions, actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Upon consolidation, all inter-company accounts, transactions and profits have been eliminated.


Reclassifications

 

The Company has reclassified certain items within the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the prior year in order to be comparable with the current presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income (loss) or shareholders' equity.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in banks with original maturities of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost which approximates fair value, which in the opinion of management, are subject to an insignificant risk of loss in value. The Company maintains cash balances in excess of federally insured limits.

 

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

Accounts receivable consists primarily of amounts due from U.S. customers from product sales. The allowance for doubtful accounts totaled $60.0 thousand and $35.0 thousand at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts includes a number of factors, including the age of the balance, estimated settlement adjustments, past experience with the customer account, changes in collection patterns and general economic and industry conditions. Interest is not normally charged on receivables, nor is collateral for receivables normally required. Potential credit losses from significant customers could adversely affect results of operations or financial condition. While the Company believes the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate, changes in economic conditions or any weakness in the steel and metals industry could adversely impact future earnings. In general, the Company considers accounts receivable past due which are 30 to 60 days after the invoice date. Losses are charged off to the allowance when it is deemed further collection efforts will not provide additional recoveries.

 

Major Customer

 

The Company had sales to a major customer that totaled approximately 16.3% and 12.5% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The accounts receivable balance related to the major customer was $0.8 million and $0.4 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. 

 

Inventories

 

The Company's inventories primarily consist of ferrous and non-ferrous scrap metals, and are valued at the lower of average purchased cost or net realizable value ("NRV") based on the specific scrap commodity. See Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards at the end of Note 1. Quantities of inventories are determined based on our inventory systems and are subject to periodic physical verification using estimation techniques including observation, weighing and other industry methods. The Company recognizes inventory impairment and related adjustments when the NRV, based upon current market pricing, falls below recorded value or when the estimated volume is less than the recorded volume of the inventory. The Company records the loss in cost of sales in the period during which the loss is identified.

 

Certain assumptions are made regarding future demand and net realizable value in order to assess whether inventory is properly recorded at the lower of cost or NRV. Assumptions are based on historical experience, current market conditions and remaining costs of processing (if any) and disposal. If the anticipated future selling prices of scrap metal and finished steel products should decline, the Company would re-assess the recorded NRV of the inventory and make any adjustments believed necessary in order to reduce the value of the inventory (and increase cost of sales) to the lower of cost or NRV. The Company did not have a lower of cost or NRV inventory write-down for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

 

Some commodities are in saleable condition at acquisition. The Company purchases these commodities in small amounts until it has a truckload of material available for shipment. Some commodities are not in saleable condition at acquisition. These commodities must be shredded, torched or baled. ISA does not have work-in-process inventory that needs to be manufactured to become finished goods. The Company includes processing costs in inventory for all commodities based upon weight.

 

Inventories for ferrous and non-ferrous materials as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 consist of the following:

 


 


 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

December 31, 2016

 

(in thousands)

Raw materials

$

3,046


 

$

2,222

 

Finished goods

1,366


 

805

 

Processing costs

694


 

410

 

Total inventories for sale

$

5,106


 

$

3,437

 

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related property.

 

Property and equipment, in thousands, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Life

 

2017

 

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

Land

 

 

$

4,993

 

 

$

4,993

 

Equipment and vehicles

1-10 years

 

26,738

 

 

26,606

 

Office equipment

1-7 years

 

1,457

 

 

1,624

 

Building and leasehold improvements

5-40 years

 

7,685

 

 

7,708

 

 

 

 

$

40,873

 

 

$

40,931

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

29,661

 

 

27,863

 

 

 

 

$

11,212

 

 

$

13,068

  

 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $2.2 million and $2.3 million, respectively. Of the $2.2 million of depreciation expense recognized in 2017, $2.1 million was recorded in cost of sales, and $0.1 million was recorded in general and administrative expense. Of the $2.3 million of depreciation expense recognized in 2016, $2.2 million was recorded in cost of sales, and $0.1 million was recorded in general and administrative expense.

 

Certain Banking Expenses

 

The Company has included certain banking costs relating to our loans and loan restructuring within interest expense. The loan fees amortization totaled $123.9 thousand and $130.1 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In 2016, the Company incurred $240.5 thousand in banking expenses when the Company entered into a loan with MidCap. In 2017, the Company capitalized loan fees of $124.9 thousand of which the Company incurred $59.7 thousand in banking expenses when the Company entered into a loan amendment with Midcap.

 

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs

 

Shipping and handling charges incurred by the Company are included in cost of sales and shipping charges billed to the customer are included in revenues in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

 

Derivative and Hedging Activities

 

The Company is exposed to market risk stemming from changes in metal commodity prices, and interest rates. In the normal course of business, the Company actively manages its exposure to interest rate risks by entering into various hedging transactions, authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities. Derivative financial instruments previously used consist of interest rate swap contracts. Derivative financial instruments are accounted for under the provisions of the FASB's authoritative guidance titled “ASC 815 - Derivatives and Hedging.” Under these standards, derivatives are carried on the balance sheet at fair value. The Company's interest rate swaps were designated as a cash flow hedge, and the effective portions of changes in the fair value of the derivatives were recorded as a component of other comprehensive income or loss and were recognized in the statement of operations when the hedged item affected earnings. Ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges were recognized in gain or loss on derivative liabilities. Cash flows related to derivatives were included in operating activities.  As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not have any interest rate swap instruments.  


During 2017 and 2016, the Company did not use derivative instruments in the form of exchange traded commodity futures to assist in managing commodity price risk. The Company does not enter into any commodity hedges for trading purposes. 

 

Income Taxes

 

Deferred income taxes are recorded to recognize the tax consequences on future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes, referred to as “temporary differences,” and for net operating loss carry-forwards subject to an ongoing assessment of realizability. Deferred income taxes are measured by applying currently enacted tax laws. The Company uses the deferral method of accounting for available state tax credits relating to the purchase of the shredder equipment.

 

The FASB has issued guidance, included in the ASC, related to the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements. The Company recognizes uncertain income tax positions using the "more-likely-than-not" approach as defined in the ASC. The amount recognized is subject to estimate and management’s judgment with respect to the most likely outcome for each uncertain tax position. The amount that is ultimately sustained for an individual uncertain tax position or for all uncertain tax positions in the aggregate could differ from the amount recognized. The Company has no liability for uncertain tax positions recognized as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

 

As a policy, the Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax positions in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. See also Note 6 - Income Taxes for additional information relating to income taxes.

 

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock units and warrants.

 

Stock Option Arrangements

 

The Company has a Long Term Incentive Plan adopted in 2009 ("LTIP") under which it may grant equity awards for up to 2.4 million shares of common stock, which are reserved by the Board of Directors for issuance of equity awards. The Company provides compensation benefits by granting stock options and other share-based awards to employees and directors. The exercise price of each option is equal to the market price of the Company's stock on the date of grant. The maximum term of the option is five years. The plan is accounted for based on FASB’s authoritative guidance titled "ASC 718 - Compensation - Stock Compensation."  The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense for the fair value of the awards, on the date granted, on a straight-line basis over their vesting term (service period). Compensation expense is recognized only for share-based payments expected to vest. The Company estimates forfeitures at the date of grant based on the Company's historical experience and future expectations.

 

The Company uses the grant date stock price to value the Company's restricted stock units.  The fair value of each restricted stock unit is estimated on the date of grant.

 

The Company uses the Modified Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to value the Company's stock options for each employee stock option award. See Note 10 - Share-based Compensation and Other Compensation Agreements. Using these option pricing models, the fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant.

 

There are two significant inputs into the stock option pricing models: expected volatility and expected term. The Company estimates expected volatility based on traded option volatility of the Company's stock over a term equal to the expected term of the option granted. The expected term of stock option awards granted is derived from historical exercise experience under the Company's stock option plans and represents the period of time that stock option awards granted are expected to be outstanding.

 

The expected term assumption incorporates the contractual term of an option grant, as well as the vesting period of an award. The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield on a U.S. Treasury constant maturity with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the option granted. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards represent management's best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management's judgment. As a result, if factors change and different assumptions are used, stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate, and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. If the actual forfeiture rate is materially different from the estimate, the stock-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what was recorded in the current period.

 

Treasury shares or new shares are issued for exercised options. The Company does not expect to repurchase any additional shares within the following annual period to accommodate the exercise of outstanding stock options.

 

Under the LTIP, the Company may grant any of these types of awards: non-qualified and incentive stock options; stock appreciation rights; and other stock awards including stock units, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and restricted stock. The performance goals that the Company may use for such awards will be based on any one or more of the following performance measures: cash flow; earnings; earnings per share; market value added or economic value added; profits; return on assets; return on equity; return on investment; revenues; stock price; or total shareholder return.

 

The LTIP is administered by a committee selected by the Board consisting of two or more outside members of the Board. The Committee may grant one or more awards to our employees, including our officers, our directors and consultants, and will determine the specific employees who will receive awards under the plan and the type and amount of any such awards. A participant who receives shares of stock awarded under the plan must hold those shares for six months before the participant may dispose of such shares

 

Subject to shareholder approval and restrictions on exercisability set forth in a Stock Option Agreement entered into on December 2, 2013 between the Company and Algar (the “Stock Option Agreement”), the Company granted Algar an option to purchase a total of 1.5 million shares (in four tranches) of Company common stock (the "Algar Options") at an exercise price per share of $5.00. The Algar Options were not issued under the LTIP. The Company's shareholders approved the Algar Options on October 15, 2014.  On September 30, 2016, the Company and Algar mutually agreed to terminate the Management Agreement between them dated as of December 1, 2013. As part of the agreement to terminate the Management Agreement, the Stock Option Agreement was also terminated.  See Note 9 - Related Party Transactions for further details.

 

The Company used the Lattice-Based model to value the Company's stock options for the Algar Options due to market and performance conditions prior to September 30, 2016. See Note 10 - Share-based Compensation and Other Compensation Agreements. The fair value of the Algar Options was estimated at the end of each quarter for the third and fourth tranches due to ongoing performance conditions. For the first two tranches, the conditions for vesting were met.

 

Subsequent Events

 

The Company has evaluated the period from December 31, 2017 through the date the financial statements herein were issued and noted no subsequent events requiring recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.  

 

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The amendments in ASU 2014-09 affect any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (e.g., insurance contracts or lease contracts). The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 was permitted. The Company evaluated the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on the Consolidated Financial Statements and did not record any material impact from the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on the Consolidated Financial Statements as of January 1, 2018.

 

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent on the consolidated balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those annual periods. Upon adoption, ASU 2015-17 may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. The Company adopted the standard prospectively in the first quarter of 2017 and noted no material impact from the adoption on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions. This ASU will require organizations that lease assets (“lessees”) to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset on its balance sheet for all leases with terms of more than twelve months. A lease liability is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis and a right-of-use asset represents the lessee’s right to use, or control use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The amendments in this ASU simplify the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions. This ASU leaves the accounting for the organizations that own the leased assets largely unchanged except for targeted improvements to align it with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

 

The amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2016-02 on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, which provides guidance to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2016-13 on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which provides guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. Upon adoption, ASU 2016-15 should be applied retrospectively. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2016-15 on the Consolidated Financial Statements as early adoption was not elected, but does not expect a material impact from the adoption of ASU 2016-15 on the Consolidated Financial Statements.