Regulatory Capital and Other Regulatory Matters

The FRB and other U.S. banking agencies have adopted risk-based and leverage capital standards that establish minimum capital-to-asset ratios for BHCs, like Ally, and depository institutions, like Ally Bank. The risk-based capital ratios are based on a banking organization’s risk-weighted assets (RWAs), which are generally determined under the Basel III standardized approach applicable to Ally and Ally Bank by (1) assigning on-balance sheet exposures to broad risk weight categories according to the counterparty or, if relevant, the guarantor or collateral (with higher risk weights assigned to categories of exposures perceived as representing greater risk), and (2) multiplying off-balance sheet exposures by specified credit conversion factors to calculate credit equivalent amounts and assigning those credit equivalent amounts to the relevant risk weight categories. The leverage ratio, in contrast, is based on an institution’s average unweighted on-balance sheet exposures.

Ally and Ally Bank are subject to capital requirements issued by U.S. banking regulators that require us to maintain risk-based and leverage capital ratios above minimum levels. As of January 1, 2015, Ally and Ally Bank became subject to the rules implementing the 2010 Basel III capital framework in the United States (U.S. Basel III), which generally reflects higher capital requirements, capital buffers, and changes to regulatory capital definitions, deductions and adjustments, relative to the predecessor requirements implementing the Basel I capital framework in the United States. Certain aspects of U.S. Basel III, including the capital buffers are subject to a phase-in period through December 31, 2018.

Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary action by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements or the results of operations and financial condition of Ally and Ally Bank. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we and Ally Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of capital, assets and certain off-balance sheet items. These measures and related classifications, which are used in the calculation of our risk-based and leverage capital ratios and those of Ally Bank, are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about the components of capital, the risk-weightings of assets and other exposures, and other factors. The FRB also uses these ratios and guidelines as part of the capital planning and stress testing processes. In addition, in order for Ally to maintain its status as an FHC, Ally and its bank subsidiary, Ally Bank, must remain well capitalized and well managed, as defined under applicable laws. The well capitalized standard for insured depository institutions, such as Ally Bank, reflects the capital requirements under U.S. Basel III.

Under U.S. Basel III, Ally and Ally Bank must maintain a minimum Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.5%, a minimum Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6%, and a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 8%. In addition to these minimum risk-based capital ratios, Ally and Ally Bank are also subject to a Common Equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of more than 2.5%, subject to a phase-in period from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2018. Failure to maintain the full amount of the buffer would result in restrictions on the ability of Ally and Ally Bank to make capital distributions, including dividend payments and stock repurchases and redemptions, and to pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers. U.S. Basel III also subjects Ally and Ally Bank to a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%.

U.S. Basel III also revised the eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments and provides for the phase-out of instruments that had previously been recognized as capital but that do not satisfy these criteria. For example, subject to certain exceptions (e.g., certain debt or equity issued to the U.S. government under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act), trust preferred and other hybrid securities were excluded from a BHC’s Tier 1 capital as of January 1, 2016. Also, subject to a phase-in schedule, certain items are deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 capital under U.S. Basel III that had not previously been deducted from regulatory capital, and certain other deductions from regulatory capital have been modified. Among other things, U.S. Basel III requires significant investments in the common stock of unconsolidated financial institutions, mortgage servicing assets, and certain deferred tax assets that exceed specified individual and aggregate thresholds to be deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 capital. U.S. Basel III also revised the standardized approach for calculating RWAs by, among other things, modifying certain risk weights and the methods for calculating RWAs for certain types of assets and exposures.

Ally and Ally Bank are subject to the U.S. Basel III standardized approach for counterparty credit risk, but not to the U.S. Basel III advanced approaches for credit risk or operational risk. Ally is also not subject to the U.S. market risk capital rule, which applies only to banking organizations with significant trading assets and liabilities.

On April 13, 2018, the FRB and other U.S. banking agencies proposed a revision to their regulatory capital rules to address the regulatory capital treatment related to ASU 2016-13, which Ally plans to adopt effective January 1, 2020, as further described in Note 1. We expect the implementation of ASU 2016-13 will significantly increase our allowance for credit losses upon adoption. If finalized, the proposed changes to the regulatory capital rules would allow Ally to phase in the impact to our regulatory capital as a result of the increase to our allowance for credit losses on a straight-line basis over a three-year period. In addition, the U.S. banking agencies are proposing to make amendments to the stress testing regulations which would exclude the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 until the 2020 stress testing cycle.

On April 10, 2018, the FRB issued a proposal that would seek to more closely align forward-looking stress testing results with the FRB’s non-stress capital requirements for banking organizations with $50 billion or more in assets. The proposal would introduce a “stress capital buffer” based on firm-specific stress test performance, which would effectively replace the capital conservation buffer for determining non-stress capital requirements. The proposal would also incorporate several other changes to the CCAR process including eliminating the CCAR quantitative objection, narrowing the set of planned capital actions assumed to occur in the stress scenario and eliminating the thirty percent dividend payout ratio as a criterion for heightened scrutiny of a firm’s capital plan, among other proposed changes. If finalized, the rule would be effective on December 31, 2018, and a firm’s first stress buffer requirements would generally be effective on October 1, 2019. We are currently evaluating the effect this proposal will have on our capital planning and stress testing requirements. In December 2017, the Basel Committee approved revisions to the global Basel III capital framework (commonly known as Basel IV), many of which—if adopted in the United States—could heighten regulatory capital standards even more. At this time, it is not clear how all of these proposals and revisions will be harmonized and finalized in the United States.

On March 7, 2016, Ally Bank received approval from the FRB to become a state member bank. Ally Bank is now regulated by the FRB through the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, as well as the Utah Department of Financial Institutions (UDFI). As a requirement of FRB membership, we held $446 million of FRB stock at March 31, 2018. In addition, in connection with the application for membership in the Federal Reserve System, Ally Bank made commitments to the FRB relating to capital, liquidity, and business plan requirements. These commitments were consistent with the prior requirements under the now-terminated Capital and Liquidity Maintenance Agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), including the requirement to maintain capital at a level such that Ally Bank’s Tier 1 leverage ratio was at least 15%. On August 22, 2017, banking agencies lifted the capital, liquidity, and business plan commitments that Ally Bank had made in connection with its application for membership in the Federal Reserve System, including the commitment to maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 15%.

Compliance with capital requirements is a strategic priority for Ally. We expect to be in compliance with all applicable requirements within the established timeframes.

The following table summarizes our capital ratios under the U.S. Basel III capital framework.



	March 31, 2018				December 31, 2017				Required minimum (a)		Well-capitalized minimum
($ in millions)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Required minimum (a)		Well-capitalized minimum
Capital ratios
Common Equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)
Ally Financial Inc.	$	13,079	9.26	%	$	13,237	9.53	%	4.50	%	(b)
Ally Bank	16,535		13.93		17,059		15.04		4.50		6.50	%
Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)
Ally Financial Inc.	$	15,512	10.98	%	$	15,628	11.25	%	6.00	%	6.00	%
Ally Bank	16,535		13.93		17,059		15.04		6.00		8.00
Total (to risk-weighted assets)
Ally Financial Inc.	$	17,760	12.57	%	$	17,974	12.94	%	8.00	%	10.00	%
Ally Bank	17,480		14.72		17,886		15.77		8.00		10.00
Tier 1 leverage (to adjusted quarterly average assets) (c)
Ally Financial Inc.	$	15,512	9.26	%	$	15,628	9.53	%	4.00	%	(b)
Ally Bank	16,535		11.94		17,059		12.87		4.00		5.00	%


(a)	In addition to the minimum risk-based capital requirements for common equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital, and total capital ratios, Ally and Ally Bank were required to maintain a minimum capital conservation buffer of 1.875% and 1.25% at March 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017, respectively, which ultimately increases to 2.5% on January 1, 2019.


(b)	Currently, there is no ratio component for determining whether a BHC is “well-capitalized.”


(c)	Federal regulatory reporting guidelines require the calculation of adjusted quarterly average assets using a daily average methodology.

At March 31, 2018, Ally and Ally Bank were “well-capitalized” and met all applicable capital requirements to which each was subject.

Capital Planning and Stress Tests

As a BHC with $50 billion or more of total consolidated assets, Ally is required to conduct semi-annual company-run stress tests, is subject to an annual supervisory stress test conducted by the FRB, and must submit a proposed capital plan to the FRB.

Ally’s proposed capital plan must include an assessment of our expected uses and sources of capital and a description of all planned capital actions over a nine-quarter planning horizon, including any issuance of a debt or equity capital instrument, any dividend or other capital distribution, and any similar action that the FRB determines could have an impact on Ally’s capital. The proposed capital plan must also include a discussion of how Ally, under expected and stressful conditions, will maintain capital commensurate with its risks and above the minimum regulatory capital ratios, and serve as a source of strength to Ally Bank. The FRB will either object to Ally’s proposed capital plan, in whole or in part, or provide a notice of non-objection to Ally’s proposed capital plan, and must do so before Ally may take any capital action. In addition, even if the FRB does not object to our capital plan, Ally may be precluded from or limited in paying dividends or other capital distributions without the FRB’s approval under certain circumstances—for example, when we would not meet minimum regulatory capital ratios and capital buffers after giving effect to the distributions.

As part of the 2017 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) process, on April 5, 2017, we submitted our 2017 capital plan and stress test results to the FRB. On June 23, 2017, we publicly disclosed summary results of the stress test under the most severe scenario in accordance with regulatory requirements. On June 28, 2017, we received a non-objection to our capital plan from the FRB, including the proposed capital actions contained in our submission. The capital actions included a 50% increase in the quarterly cash dividend on common stock from $0.08 per share to $0.12 per share, and a 9% increase in our share repurchase program, which has been authorized by the Ally Board of Directors (the Board), permitting us to repurchase up to $760 million of our common stock from time to time from the third quarter of 2017 through the second quarter of 2018. In addition, we submitted to the FRB the results of our company-run mid-cycle stress test conducted under multiple macroeconomic scenarios and disclosed the results of this stress test under the most severe scenario on October 5, 2017, in accordance with regulatory requirements. Additionally, in connection with the 2017 CCAR process, on April 10, 2018, the Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.13 per share on all common stock, payable on May 15, 2018.

The following table presents information related to our common stock for each quarter since the commencement of our common stock repurchase programs and initiation of a quarterly cash dividend on common stock.



	Common stock repurchased during period (a)			Number of common shares outstanding		Cash dividends declared per common share (b)
($ in millions, except per share data; shares in thousands)	Approximate dollar value		Number of shares	Beginning of period	End of period	Cash dividends declared per common share (b)
2016
Third quarter	$	159	8,298	483,753	475,470	$	0.08
Fourth quarter	167		8,745	475,470	467,000	0.08
2017
First quarter	$	169	8,097	467,000	462,193	$	0.08
Second quarter	204		10,485	462,193	452,292	0.08
Third quarter	190		8,507	452,292	443,796	0.12
Fourth quarter	190		7,033	443,796	437,054	0.12
2018
First quarter	$	185	6,473	437,054	432,691	$	0.13


(a)	Includes shares of common stock withheld to cover income taxes owed by participants in our share-based incentive plans.


(b)	On April 10, 2018, the Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.13 per share on all common stock, payable on May 15, 2018. Refer to Note 25 for further information regarding this common stock dividend.

Ally submitted its 2018 capital plan on April 5, 2018, with capital actions including distributions to common stockholders through share repurchases and cash dividends. We expect to receive the FRB’s response (either a non-objection or objection) to Ally’s 2018 capital plan by June 30, 2018. Our ability to make capital distributions, including our ability to pay dividends or repurchase shares of our common stock, will continue to be subject to the FRB’s review of and non-objection to the actions that we propose each year in our annual capital plan. The amount and size of any future dividends and share repurchases will depend upon our results of operations, capital levels, future opportunities, consideration and approval by the Board, and other considerations including the degree of severity of stress scenarios assigned by the FRB as part of the CCAR process.

In January 2017, the FRB amended the capital planning and stress testing rules, effective for the 2017 cycle and beyond. As a result of this amendment, the FRB may no longer object to the capital plan of a large and noncomplex BHC, like Ally, on the basis of qualitative deficiencies in its capital planning process. Instead, the qualitative assessment of Ally’s capital planning process is now conducted outside of CCAR through the supervisory review process. The amendment also decreased the de minimis threshold for the amount of capital that Ally could distribute to stockholders outside of an approved capital plan without seeking prior approval of the FRB, and modified Ally’s reporting requirements to reduce unnecessary burdens.