XML 81 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Regulatory Capital
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Regulatory Capital Requirements [Abstract]  
Regulatory Capital Requirements under Banking Regulations [Text Block]
Regulatory Capital and Other Regulatory Matters
As a bank holding company, we and our wholly owned state-chartered banking subsidiary, Ally Bank, are subject to risk-based and leverage capital requirements issued by U.S. banking regulators that require us to maintain regulatory capital ratios above minimum levels. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary action by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the consolidated financial statements or the results of operations and financial condition of Ally and Ally Bank. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets and certain off-balance sheet items. Our capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk-weightings, and other factors.
A risk-based capital ratio is the ratio of a banking organization’s regulatory capital (numerator) to its risk-weighted assets (denominator). Under the existing Basel I capital rules, regulatory capital is divided into two tiers: Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital. Tier 1 capital generally consists of common equity, minority interests, qualifying noncumulative preferred stock, and the fixed rate cumulative preferred stock sold to Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), less goodwill and other adjustments. Tier 2 capital generally consists of perpetual preferred stock not qualifying as Tier 1 capital, limited amounts of subordinated debt and the allowance for loan losses, and other adjustments. The amount of Tier 2 capital may not exceed the amount of Tier 1 capital. Total regulatory capital is the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. Under the existing Basel I capital rules, risk-weighted assets are determined by allocating assets and specified off-balance sheet financial instruments into several broad risk-weight categories with higher risk weights (expressed in percentage) assigned to asset classes that present greater perceived risk. Under the existing Basel I capital rules, banking organizations are required to maintain a minimum Total risk-based capital ratio (Total capital to risk-weighted assets) of 8% and a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets) of 4%.
The U.S. banking regulators also have established minimum leverage capital ratio requirements. The Tier 1 leverage ratio is defined as Tier 1 capital divided by adjusted quarterly average total assets (which reflect adjustments for disallowed goodwill and certain intangible assets). Under the existing Basel I capital rules, the minimum U.S. Tier 1 leverage ratio is 3% or 4% depending on factors specified in the regulations.
Under the U.S. banking regulators’ existing regulations, a banking organization meets the regulatory definition of “well-capitalized” when its Total risk-based capital ratio equals or exceeds 10% and its Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio equals or exceeds 6%; and for insured depository institutions, when its leverage ratio equals or exceeds 5%, unless subject to a regulatory directive to maintain higher capital levels. To maintain its status as a financial holding company, Ally and its bank subsidiary, Ally Bank, must remain “well-capitalized” and “well-managed,” as defined under applicable law.
In the context of capital planning and stress testing, the U.S. banking regulators have also developed a measure of capital called “Tier 1 common,” which is defined as Tier 1 capital less noncommon elements, including qualifying perpetual preferred stock, minority interest in subsidiaries, trust preferred securities, and mandatory convertible preferred securities. Tier 1 common is used by banking regulators, investors and analysts to assess and compare the quality and composition of Ally's capital with the capital of other financial services companies. Also, bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more, such as Ally, must develop and maintain a capital plan annually, and among other elements, the capital plan must include a discussion of how we will maintain a pro forma Tier 1 common risk-based capital ratio (Tier 1 common to risk-weighted assets) above 5% under expected conditions and certain stressed scenarios.
During 2010, Ally, IB Finance Holding Company, LLC, Ally Bank, and the FDIC entered into a Capital and Liquidity Maintenance Agreement (CLMA). The effective date of the CLMA was August 24, 2010. The CLMA requires capital at Ally Bank to be maintained at a level such that Ally Bank's leverage ratio is at least 15%. For this purpose, the leverage ratio is determined in accordance with the FDIC's regulations related to capital maintenance.
The U.S. banking regulators have issued the U.S. Basel III final rules to replace the existing Basel I capital rules. Refer to Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information about the U.S. Basel III final rules and their applicability to Ally and Ally Bank. Compliance with evolving capital requirements is a strategic priority for Ally. We expect to be in compliance with all applicable requirements within the established timeframes.
The following table summarizes our capital ratios.
 
March 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
Required
minimum
 
Well-capitalized
minimum
($ in millions)
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Risk-based capital
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ally Financial Inc.
$
15,479

 
12.12
%
 
$
15,165

 
11.79
%
 
4.00
%
 
6.00
%
Ally Bank
15,403

 
17.34

 
15,159

 
16.73

 
4.00

  
6.00

Total (to risk-weighted assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ally Financial Inc.
$
16,633

 
13.02
%
 
$
16,405

 
12.76
%
 
8.00
%
 
10.00
%
Ally Bank
16,019

 
18.03

 
15,809

 
17.45

 
8.00

  
10.00

Tier 1 leverage (to adjusted quarterly average assets) (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ally Financial Inc.
$
15,479

 
10.39
%
 
$
15,165

 
10.23
%
 
3.00–4.00%

 
(b)

Ally Bank
15,403

 
15.70

 
15,159

 
15.77

 
15.00

(c) 
5.00
%
Tier 1 common (to risk-weighted assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ally Financial Inc.
$
11,679

 
9.14
%
 
$
11,366

 
8.84
%
 
n/a

  
n/a

Ally Bank
15,403

 
17.34

 
15,159

 
16.73

 
n/a

  
n/a

n/a = not applicable
(a)
Federal regulatory reporting guidelines require the calculation of adjusted quarterly average assets using a daily average methodology.
(b)
There is no Tier 1 leverage component in the definition of "well-capitalized" for a bank holding company.
(c)
Ally Bank, in accordance with the CLMA, is required to maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 15%.
At March 31, 2014, Ally and Ally Bank were “well-capitalized” and met all capital requirements to which each was subject.
Capital Planning and Stress Tests
As a bank holding company with $50 billion or more of consolidated assets, Ally is required to conduct periodic stress tests and submit a proposed capital plan to the FRB every January, which the FRB must take action on by the following March. The proposed capital plan must include a description of all planned capital actions over a nine-quarter planning horizon. The proposed capital plan must also include a discussion of how Ally will maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios and above a Tier 1 common equity-to-total risk-weighted assets ratio of 5%, and serve as a source of strength to Ally Bank. The FRB must approve Ally's proposed capital plan before Ally may take any proposed capital action.
In November 2013, the FRB issued instructions for the 2014 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and the 2014 supervisory stress test scenarios. On January 6, 2014, Ally and Ally Bank submitted the 2014 capital plan and stress tests as required by the rules and the 2014 CCAR instructions, and in March 2014, the FRB indicated that it did not object to our 2014 capital plan.