XML 65 R32.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Contingencies And Other Risks
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Loss Contingency [Abstract]  
Contingencies Disclosure and Other Risks [Text Block]
Contingencies and Other Risks
In the normal course of business, we enter into transactions that expose us to varying degrees of risk. For additional information on contingencies and other risks arising from such transactions, refer to Note 31 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Mortgage-Related Matters
ResCap Bankruptcy Filing
As described in Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, on May 14, 2012, Residential Capital, LLC (ResCap) and certain of its wholly owned direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the Debtors) filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Bankruptcy Court). In connection with the filings, Ally Financial Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries and affiliates (excluding the Debtors and their direct and indirect subsidiaries) (collectively, AFI) reached an agreement with the Debtors and certain creditor constituencies on a prearranged Chapter 11 plan (the Plan).
The contemplated Plan, a draft of which has been submitted to the Bankruptcy Court, is subject to negotiation with certain of the Debtors’ creditors (as directed by the Bankruptcy Court) and Bankruptcy Court approval. It is based on a settlement (the Settlement) that provides for the release of all existing or potential causes of action between AFI and the Debtors, as well as a release of all existing or potential ResCap-related causes of action against AFI held by third parties.
There can be no assurances that the Bankruptcy Court will confirm the Settlement or the Plan, and even if confirmed, the Settlement and Plan are each subject to several conditions, which may not occur. In particular, the Bankruptcy Court may not approve the proposed release of all existing or potential ResCap-related causes of action against AFI held by third parties. The failure of the Plan being confirmed would result in modifications to the Plan, or the pursuit of an alternative form of reorganization or liquidation. This could result in delay and significant expense, and any modifications to the Plan or other alternative may be less favorable to AFI. If AFI does not receive the releases contemplated by the Plan, the Debtors and/or third party creditors are likely to assert substantial claims directly against AFI, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Based on our assessment of the effect of the deconsolidation of ResCap, obligations under the Plan, and other impacts related to the bankruptcy filing, we recorded a charge of $1.2 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Given the inherent uncertainty of the bankruptcy process, it is possible that this amount could be modified in the future.
Mortgage Settlements and Consent Order
On February 9, 2012, we announced that we had reached an agreement with respect to investigations into procedures followed by mortgage servicing companies and banks in connection with mortgage origination and servicing activities and foreclosure home sales and evictions (Mortgage Settlement). Further, as a result of an examination conducted by the FRB and FDIC, on April 13, 2011, we entered into a consent order (the Consent Order) with the FRB and the FDIC, that required, among other things, GMAC Mortgage, LLC to retain independent consultants to conduct a risk assessment related to mortgage servicing activities and, separately, to conduct a review of certain past residential mortgage foreclosure actions. The Debtors are primarily liable for all remaining obligations under both the Mortgage Settlement and Consent Order. AFI is secondarily liable for the specific performance of required actions, and is jointly and severally liable for certain financial obligations. As of September 30, 2012, the official committee of unsecured creditors appointed in the Debtors' bankruptcy cases has filed objections to motions challenging the allocation of liability between AFI and the Debtors with respect to certain obligations under the Mortgage Settlement and the Consent Order.
Loan Repurchases and Obligations Related to Loan Sales
Representation and Warranty Obligation Reserve Methodology
A significant portion of our representation and warranty obligations were eliminated as a result of the deconsolidation of ResCap. Related to the deconsolidation of ResCap, we allocated a representation and warranty reserve to Ally Bank, which was $127 million at September 30, 2012 with respect to Ally Bank's sold and serviced loans. The current liability for representation and warranty obligations reflects management's best estimate of probable losses with respect to Ally Bank's mortgage loans sold to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. We considered historical and recent demand trends in establishing the reserve. The methodology used to estimate the reserve considers a variety of assumptions including borrower performance (both actual and estimated future defaults), repurchase demand behavior, historical loan defect experience, historical mortgage insurance rescission experience, and historical and estimated future loss experience, which includes projections of future home price changes as well as other qualitative factors including investor behavior. It is difficult to predict and estimate the level and timing of any potential future demands. In cases where we may not be able to reasonably estimate losses, a liability is not recognized. Management monitors the adequacy of the overall reserve and makes adjustments to the level of reserve, as necessary, after consideration of other qualitative factors including ongoing dialogue and experience with counterparties.
At the time a loan is sold, an estimate of the fair value of the liability is recorded and classified in accrued expenses and other liabilities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and recorded as a component of gain (loss) on mortgage and automotive loans, net, in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. We recognize changes in the liability when additional relevant information becomes available. Changes in the estimate are recorded as other operating expenses in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. The repurchase reserve at September 30, 2012, relates exclusively to GSE exposure.
The following tables summarize the changes in our reserve for representation and warranty obligations.
Three months ended September 30, ($ in millions)
 
2012 (a)
 
2011
Balance at July 1,
 
$
124

 
$
829

Provision for mortgage representation and warranty expenses
 
 
 
 
Loan sales
 
3

 
5

Change in estimate — continuing operations
 
30

 
70

Total additions
 
33

 
75

Resolved claims (b)
 
(30
)
 
(78
)
Recoveries
 

 
3

Balance at September 30,
 
$
127

 
$
829

(a)
The balance is at Ally Bank as a result of the deconsolidation of ResCap. Refer to Note 1 for more information regarding the Debtors' Bankruptcy and the deconsolidation of ResCap.
(b)
Includes principal losses and accrued interest on repurchased loans, indemnification payments, and settlements with counterparties.
Nine months ended September 30, ($ in millions)
 
2012 (a)
 
2011
Balance at January 1,
 
$
825

 
$
830

Provision for mortgage representation and warranty expenses
 
 
 
 
Loan sales
 
11

 
16

Change in estimate — continuing operations
 
67

 
280

Total additions
 
78

 
296

Resolved claims (b)
 
(117
)
 
(306
)
Recoveries
 
6

 
9

Deconsolidation of ResCap
 
(665
)
 

Balance at September 30,
 
$
127

 
$
829


(a)
The remaining balance is at Ally Bank as a result of the deconsolidation of ResCap. Refer to Note 1 for more information regarding the Debtors' Bankruptcy and the deconsolidation of ResCap.
(b)
Includes principal losses and accrued interest on repurchased loans, indemnification payments, and settlements with counterparties.
Legal Proceedings
We are subject to potential liability under various governmental proceedings, claims, and legal actions that are pending or otherwise asserted against us. We are named as defendants in a number of legal actions, and we are involved in governmental proceedings arising in connection with our respective businesses. Some of the pending actions purport to be class actions, and certain legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. We establish reserves for legal claims when payments associated with the claims become probable and the payments can be reasonably estimated. Given the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of litigation and regulatory matters, it is generally very difficult to predict what the eventual outcome will be, and when the matter will be resolved. The actual costs of resolving legal claims may be higher or lower than any amounts reserved for the claims.
We have previously disclosed various litigation matters where certain of Ally's subsidiaries (including the Debtors (as defined above)) were named as defendants in cases relating to mortgage-backed securities and certain other mortgage-related matters. As a result of the bankruptcy filings, all litigation against the Debtors has been automatically stayed and will be resolved in the bankruptcy litigation out of the assets of the estate. Ally believes that it has no potential future liability with respect to any litigation claims pending solely against the Debtors.
Ally Financial Inc. and certain other Ally subsidiaries (excluding the Debtors) are also named as defendants in various cases relating to mortgage-backed securities and certain other mortgage-related matters. These cases include litigation with, among others, the following: Allstate; Assured Guaranty; the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA); the Federal Home Loan Banks of Indianapolis, Boston and Chicago; Huntington Bancshares; John Hancock; Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance; MBIA; New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund; and the Financial Guaranty Insurance Company (collectively, the Remaining Cases). All but five of the Remaining Cases have been stayed through January 31, 2013, subject to permitting certain limited proceedings in some of the Remaining Cases. Pending cases that have not been stayed by the bankruptcy court include cases with the FDIC (three cases), FHFA (one case), and MBIA (one case). We believe that we have strong legal and factual defenses with respect to the Remaining Cases. As described earlier, the proposed bankruptcy Plan provides for a release of all existing and potential causes of action against Ally held by ResCap, and existing and potential ResCap-related causes of action against Ally held by third parties. These releases, if approved by the Bankruptcy Court, would result in Ally being released from any and all potential liability with respect to the Remaining Cases. If the Plan is not approved, or if a Plan is approved that does not include third-party releases, the Remaining Cases would proceed against the Ally defendants. If this occurred, we would vigorously defend them.
Regulatory Matters
We continue to respond to subpoenas and document requests from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission covering a wide range of mortgage related matters, including, among other things, various aspects of the process surrounding securitizations of residential mortgages.  It is possible that this could result in actions against us. 
Other Contingencies
We are subject to potential liability under various other exposures including tax, nonrecourse loans, self-insurance, and other miscellaneous contingencies. We establish reserves for these contingencies when the item becomes probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. The actual costs of resolving these items may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts reserved for any one item. Based on information currently available, it is the opinion of management that the eventual outcome of these items will not have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.