XML 44 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Fair Value Disclosures
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures  
Fair Value Disclosures

Note 14 - Fair Value Disclosures

 

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, expands disclosures about fair value measurements, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

 

The accounting standards require that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

 

Level 1: Fair value determined based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

 

Level 2: Fair value determined using significant observable inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data, by correlation or other means.

 

Level 3: Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs, such as discounted cash flows, or similar techniques.

 

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, accounts payable and Senior Secured Credit Facility approximates the fair value due to their short-term nature.

 

Certain assets are required to be recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.

 

The carrying amounts and fair values of our financial instruments as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

 

 

Amount

 

Value

 

Amount

 

Value

 

Senior notes:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

7.50% Notes

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

46,793

 

$

45,389

 

8.50% Notes, net (1)

 

 

196,782

 

 

206,500

 

 

195,495

 

 

199,000

 

6.00% Notes, net (1)

 

 

78,878

 

 

84,984

 

 

78,558

 

 

75,368

 

Contingent consideration (earn-out) (2)

 

 

2,400

 

 

2,400

 

 

7,083

 

 

7,083

 

(1)

The carrying amounts are net of unamortized deferred financing costs and certain debt discounts, which were $3.2 million and $1.1 million for the 8.50% Notes and the 6.00% Notes, respectively.

(2)

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we paid $4.3 million of the earn-out and also reduced the carrying amount of the earn-out by $0.4 million to its estimated fair value.

 

In estimating the fair value of financial instruments, we used the following methods and assumptions:

 

Senior Notes

 

The fair value of the 7.50% Notes, 8.50% Notes, and 6.00% Notes is estimated, based on quoted or estimated market prices. These fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Contingent Consideration (“earn-out”)

 

This was first recognized as part of the purchase price paid for the Royal Oak and Bonterra Builders acquisitions in 2014 and 2015, respectively, and falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. For the fair value as of December 31, 2015, valuation models were used to value the earn-outs by simulating earnings, applying the terms of the earn-out in each simulated path, determining the average payment in each year across all the trials of the simulation, and calculating the sum of the present values of the payments in each year. The primary inputs and key assumptions include estimated future earnings, probabilities of achievement, earnings volatility, and the discount rate.