XML 26 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTE F — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company values its assets and liabilities using the methods of fair-value as described in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. In accordance with ASC 820, the Company determines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company generally applies the income approach to determine fair value. This method uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount. The measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts.

ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). We classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

• Level 1 - Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

• Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and amounts derived from valuation models where all significant inputs are observable in active markets.

• Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s assumptions.

For disclosure purposes, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety in the fair value hierarchy level based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the overall fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

The following table sets forth the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by input level, in the consolidated statement of net assets at December 31, 2011:

 

      September 30,       September 30,       September 30,       September 30,  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  

Mutual Funds

    2,977       —         —         2,977  

Municipal Bonds

    22,892       —         —         22,892  

Certificates of Deposit

    5,003       —         —         5,003  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets as fair value

  $ 30,872     $ —       $ —       $ 30,872  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by input level, in the consolidated statement of net assets at December 31, 2010:

 

      September 30,       September 30,       September 30,       September 30,  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level
3
    Total  

Mutual Funds

    15,574       —         —         15,574  

Municipal Bonds

    —         —         —         —    

Certificates of Deposit

    3,227       —         —         3,227  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets as fair value

  $ 18,801     $ —       $ —       $ 18,801