XML 36 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.1
Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
3 Months Ended
Mar. 02, 2019
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Change in Accounting Principl
e – Accounting for Inventory
 
During the year ended
December 2, 2018,
we elected to change our method of accounting for certain inventories in the United States within the Company’s Americas Adhesives and Construction Adhesives segments from the last-in,
first
-out method (“LIFO”) to weighted-average cost. We retrospectively adjusted the Consolidated Financial Statements for all periods presented to reflect this change.
 
Change in Accounting Principle – Revenue Recognition
 
In
May 2014,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 
No.
2014
-
09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606
)
, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. We adopted this ASU during the
three
months ended
March 2, 2019
using the modified retrospective method of adoption. As a result of the adoption of this ASU, we recorded an increase to opening retained earnings of
$1,776
as of
December 2, 2018
related to accelerated recognition for arrangements where we provide shipping and handling services after control of the goods has transferred to the customer. Prior periods were
not
restated. We have included the disclosures required by this ASU in Note
7.
 
In
March 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
08,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606
), Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)
. This ASU provides guidance on recording revenue on a gross basis versus a net basis based on the determination of whether an entity is a principal or an agent when another party is involved in providing goods or services to a customer. The amendments in this ASU affect the guidance in ASU
No.
2014
-
09
and were adopted during the
three
months ended
March 2, 2019
with ASU
No.
2014
-
09
as discussed above.
 
Change in Accounting Principle –
Income Tax Impact of
Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory
 
In
October 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
16,
Income Taxes (Topic
740
): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.
This ASU changes the timing of income tax recognition for an intercompany sale of assets. The ASU requires the seller’s tax effects and the buyer’s deferred taxes to be recognized immediately upon the sale instead of deferring accounting for the income tax implications until the assets are sold to a
third
party or recovered through use. We adopted this ASU during the
three
months ended
March 2, 2019.
We recorded a decrease to opening retained earnings of
$733
as of
December 2, 2018
as a result of the adoption of this ASU.
 
Change in Accounting Principle –
Net Periodic Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Benefit Costs
 
In
March 2017,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2017
-
07,
 
Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic
715
): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, 
which requires employers to include only the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in operating expenses. The other components of net benefit cost, including amortization of prior service cost/credit, and settlement and curtailment effects, are to be included in non-operating expenses. The classification requirements of this ASU are applied on a retrospective basis. The ASU also stipulates that only the service cost component of net benefit cost is eligible for capitalization on a prospective basis. We adopted this ASU during the
three
months ended
March 2, 2019.
As a result of adoption, the components of our net periodic defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit costs other than service cost are now presented as non-operating expenses for all periods presented. Service cost remains in operating expenses. As a result of the retrospective adjustment for the change in accounting principle, certain amounts in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the
three
months ended
March 3, 2018
were adjusted as follows:
 
   
As Reported
   
Impact of Adoption
of ASU 2017-07
   
As Adjusted
 
Cost of sales
  $
(525,374
)   $
(2,192
)   $
(527,566
)
Gross profit
   
187,705
     
(2,192
)    
185,513
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
   
(151,020
)    
(1,687
)    
(152,707
)
Other income (expense), net
   
1,033
     
3,879
     
4,912
 
                         
Net income including non-controlling interests
   
47,667
     
-
     
47,667
 
                         
Net income attributable to H.B. Fuller
   
47,682
     
-
     
47,682
 
Basic
  $
0.94
    $
-
    $
0.94
 
                         
Diluted
   
0.92
     
-
     
0.92
 
 
New Accounting Pronouncements
 
In
August 2018,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2018
-
15,
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic
350
-
40
): Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).
This ASU requires entities that are customers in cloud computing arrangements to defer implementation costs if they would be capitalized by the entity in software licensing arrangements under the internal-use software guidance. The ASU
may
be applied retrospectively or prospectively to implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. Our effective date for adoption of this ASU is our fiscal year beginning
November 29, 2020
with early adoption permitted. We early adopted this ASU during the
three
months ended
March 2, 2019
on a prospective basis which did
not
have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
 
In
August 2018,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2018
-
13,
Fair Value Measurement (Topic
820
): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.
This ASU modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The ASU removes the requirement to disclose: the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level
1
and Level
2
of the fair value hierarchy; the policy for timing of transfers between levels; and the valuation processes for Level
3
fair value measurements. The ASU requires disclosure of changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income (loss) for recurring Level
3
fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level
3
fair value measurements. Our effective date for adoption of this ASU is our fiscal year beginning
November 29, 2020
with early adoption permitted. We have evaluated the effect that this ASU will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures and determined it will
not
have a material impact.
 
In
July 2018,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2018
-
11,
Leases (Topic
842
): Targeted Improvements.
This ASU allows entities to
not
recast comparative periods in transition to ASC
842
and instead report the comparative periods presented in the period of adoption under ASC
840.
The ASU also includes a practical expedient for lessors to
not
separate the lease and nonlease components of a contract. The amendments in this ASU are effective in the same timeframe as ASU
No.
2016
-
02
as discussed below. We are incorporating this ASU into our assessment and adoption of ASU
No.
2016
-
02.
 
In
July 2018,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2018
-
10,
Codification Improvements to Topic
842,
Leases.
This ASU includes certain clarifications to address potential narrow-scope implementation issues which we are incorporating into our assessment and adoption of ASU
No.
2016
-
02.
The amendments in this ASU are effective in the same timeframe as ASU
No.
2016
-
02
as discussed below.
 
In
August 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
15,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic
230
): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force).
  This ASU requires changes in the presentation of certain items including, but
not
limited to, debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies and distributions received from equity method investees. We adopted this ASU during the
three
months ended
March 2, 2019.
Adoption of this ASU will have a presentation impact only and will result in a retrospective reclassification of debt prepayment and extinguishment costs of
$16,598
within the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended
December 2, 2017
from operating to financing cash outflows.
 
In
June 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
13
, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic
326
), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Statements.
This ASU requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset(s) to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. In
November 2018,
the FASB also issued ASU
No.
2018
-
19,
Codification Improvements to Topic
326,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses.
This ASU clarifies that receivables arising from operating leases are within the scope of Topic
842,
Leases
. The amendments in this ASU affect the guidance in ASU
No.
2016
-
13
and are effective in the same timeframe as ASU
No.
2016
-
13.
Our effective date for adoption of this ASU is our fiscal year beginning
November 29, 2020.
We are currently evaluating the effect that this ASU will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
In
February 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
02,
Leases (Subtopic
842
).
This ASU changes accounting for leases and requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities arising from all leases, including those classified as operating leases under previous accounting guidance, on the balance sheet and requires disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements to increase transparency and comparability among organizations. In
December 2018,
the FASB also issued ASU
No.
2018
-
20,
Leases (Topic
842
): Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors
, which clarifies the accounting for lessors for variable payments that relate to both a lease component and a nonlease component and is effective in the same timeframe as ASU
2016
-
02,
and ASU
No.
2019
-
01,
Leases (Topic
842
): Codification Improvements
, which clarifies the transition disclosure requirements. Our effective date for adoption of this ASU is our fiscal year beginning
December 1, 2019
with early adoption permitted. The new ASU must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition approach, and provides for certain practical expedients. We have begun implementing lease accounting software and are currently evaluating the impact that the new ASU will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements.