XML 43 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to global market risks, including the effect of changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. To manage these risks, we enter into highly effective derivative contracts. We have elected to apply hedge accounting to certain derivatives. Derivatives that are designated in hedging relationships are evaluated for effectiveness using regression analysis at the time they are designated and throughout the hedge period. Some derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting; for others, we elect not to apply hedge accounting.

Income Effect of Derivative Financial Instruments

The gains/(losses), by hedge designation, recorded in income for the periods ended June 30 were as follows (in millions):
 
Second Quarter
 
First Half
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Fair value hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net interest settlements and accruals excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness
$
98

 
$
89

 
$
197

 
$
177

Ineffectiveness (a)
5

 
(10
)
 
22

 
(4
)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments


 


 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
(43
)
 
(18
)
 
(91
)
 
(61
)
Foreign currency exchange contracts
59

 
(65
)
 
92

 

Cross-currency interest rate swap contracts
140

 
(77
)
 
335

 
12

Total
$
259

 
$
(81
)
 
$
555

 
$
124

__________
(a)
For the second quarter and first half of 2016, hedge ineffectiveness reflects the net change in fair value on derivatives of $273 million gain and $883 million gain, respectively, and change in value on hedged debt attributable to the change in benchmark interest rates of $268 million loss and $861 million loss, respectively. For the second quarter and first half of 2015, hedge ineffectiveness reflects the net change in fair value on derivatives of $249 million loss and $28 million loss, respectively, and change in value on hedged debt attributable to the change in benchmark interest rates of $239 million gain and $24 million gain, respectively.

NOTE 8. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

Balance Sheet Effect of Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative assets and liabilities are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and are presented on a gross basis. The notional amounts of the derivative instruments do not necessarily represent amounts exchanged by the parties and are not a direct measure of our financial exposure. We also enter into master agreements with counterparties that may allow for netting of exposure in the event of default or breach of the counterparty agreement.

The fair value of our derivative instruments and the associated notional amounts, presented gross, were as follows (in millions):
 
June 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Notional
 
Fair Value of Assets
 
Fair Value of Liabilities
 
Notional
 
Fair Value of Assets
 
Fair Value of Liabilities
Fair value hedges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
35,581

 
$
1,572

 
$

 
$
28,964

 
$
670

 
$
16

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
62,637

 
173

 
185

 
62,638

 
159

 
112

Foreign currency exchange contracts (a)
1,302

 
84

 
1

 
1,713

 
22

 
4

Cross-currency interest rate swap contracts
3,550

 
258

 
15

 
3,137

 
73

 
111

Total derivative financial instruments, gross (b) (c)
$
103,070

 
2,087

 
201

 
$
96,452

 
924

 
243

Counterparty netting
 
 
(147
)
 
(147
)
 
 
 
(167
)
 
(167
)
Total derivative financial instruments, net


 
$
1,940

 
$
54

 


 
$
757

 
$
76

__________
(a)
Includes forward contracts between Ford Credit and an affiliated company.
(b)
As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, pledged collateral was $2 million and $0, respectively.
(c)
All derivatives are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.