XML 42 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Finance Receivables
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Receivables [Abstract]  
Financing Receivables
FINANCE RECEIVABLES

We segment our North America and International portfolio of finance receivables into “consumer” and “non-consumer” receivables. The receivables are generally secured by the vehicles, inventory, or other property being financed.

Consumer Segment. Receivables in this portfolio segment include products offered to individuals and businesses that finance the acquisition of Ford and Lincoln vehicles from dealers for personal or commercial use. Retail financing includes retail installment contracts for new and used vehicles and direct financing leases with retail customers, government entities, daily rental companies, and fleet customers.

Non-Consumer Segment. Receivables in this portfolio segment include products offered to automotive dealers and receivables purchased from Ford and its affiliates. The products include:

Dealer financing – wholesale loans to dealers to finance the purchase of vehicle inventory, also known as floorplan financing, and loans to dealers to finance working capital and improvements to dealership facilities, finance the purchase of dealership real estate, and other dealer program financing. Wholesale is approximately 94% of our dealer financing.

Other financing – purchased receivables from Ford and its affiliates, primarily related to the sale of parts and accessories to dealers, receivables from Ford related loans, and certain used vehicles from daily rental fleet companies. These receivables are excluded from our credit quality reporting since the performance of this group of receivables is generally guaranteed by Ford.

Notes and accounts receivable from affiliated companies are presented separately on the balance sheet. These receivables are based on intercompany relationships and the balances are settled regularly. We do not assess these receivables for potential credit losses, nor are they subjected to aging analysis, credit quality reviews, or other formal assessments. As a result, Notes and accounts receivable from affiliated companies are not subject to the following disclosures contained herein.
NOTE 2. FINANCE RECEIVABLES (Continued)

Finance Receivables, Net

Finance receivables, net were as follows (in millions):
 
 
September 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
North America
 
International
 
Total Finance Receivables
 
North America
 
International
 
Total Finance Receivables
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Retail financing, gross (a)
$
40,476

 
$
10,327

 
$
50,803

 
$
39,504

 
$
8,964

 
$
48,468

Less:  Unearned interest supplements (b)
(1,231
)
 
(251
)
 
(1,482
)
 
(1,264
)
 
(222
)
 
(1,486
)
Consumer finance receivables
$
39,245

 
$
10,076

 
$
49,321

 
$
38,240

 
$
8,742

 
$
46,982

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-Consumer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dealer financing (a)(c)
$
20,395

 
$
8,065

 
$
28,460

 
$
19,494

 
$
7,496

 
$
26,990

Other
920

 
374

 
1,294

 
1,072

 
404

 
1,476

Non-Consumer finance receivables
21,315

 
8,439

 
29,754

 
20,566

 
7,900

 
28,466

Total recorded investment (d)
$
60,560

 
$
18,515

 
$
79,075

 
$
58,806

 
$
16,642

 
$
75,448

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recorded investment in finance receivables (d)
$
60,560

 
$
18,515

 
$
79,075

 
$
58,806

 
$
16,642

 
$
75,448

Less:  Allowance for credit losses (e)
(275
)
 
(74
)
 
(349
)
 
(309
)
 
(76
)
 
(385
)
Finance receivables, net
$
60,285

 
$
18,441

 
$
78,726

 
$
58,497

 
$
16,566

 
$
75,063

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net finance receivables subject to fair value (f)
 
 
 
 
$
77,093

 
 
 
 
 
$
74,171

Fair value
 
 
 
 
78,632

 
 
 
 
 
76,171

__________
(a)
At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, includes North America consumer receivables of $21.0 billion and $23.0 billion and non-consumer receivables of $17.1 billion and $17.1 billion, respectively, and International consumer receivables of $4.9 billion and $6.3 billion and non-consumer receivables of $5.0 billion and $4.5 billion, respectively, that have been sold for legal purposes in securitization transactions but continue to be reported in our consolidated financial statements. The receivables are available only for payment of the debt issued by, and other obligations of, the securitization entities that are parties to those securitization transactions; they are not available to pay our other obligations or the claims of our other creditors. We hold the right to receive the excess cash flows not needed to pay the debt issued by, and other obligations of, the securitization entities that are parties to those securitization transactions. See Note 5 for additional information.
(b)
Ford-sponsored special-rate financing attributable to retail financing.
(c)
At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, includes $54 million and $50 million, respectively, of North America wholesale receivables and $15 million and $15 million, respectively, of North America dealer loans with entities (primarily dealers) that are reported as consolidated subsidiaries of Ford. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, includes $485 million and $346 million, respectively, of International wholesale receivables with entities (primarily dealers) that are reported as consolidated subsidiaries of Ford. The associated vehicles that are being financed by us are reported as inventory on Ford’s balance sheet.
(d)
At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, excludes $176 million and $183 million, respectively, of accrued uncollected interest, which we report in Other assets on our balance sheet.
(e)
See Note 4 for additional information related to our allowance for credit losses.
(f)
At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, excludes $1.6 billion and $892 million, respectively, of certain receivables (primarily direct financing leases) that are not subject to fair value disclosure requirements. All finance receivables are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 12 for additional information.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 







NOTE 2. FINANCE RECEIVABLES (Continued)

Aging

For all classes of finance receivables, we define “past due” as any payment, including principal and interest, that has not been collected and is at least 31 days past the contractual due date. The recorded investment of consumer accounts greater than 90 days past due and still accruing interest was $15 million and $13 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The recorded investment of non-consumer accounts greater than 90 days past due and still accruing interest was $5 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
 
The aging analysis of our finance receivables balances was as follows (in millions):

 
September 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
North America
 
International
 
Total
 
North America
 
International
 
Total
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
31-60 Days past due
$
631

 
$
38

 
$
669

 
$
783

 
$
46

 
$
829

61-90 Days past due
76

 
17

 
93

 
97

 
17

 
114

91-120 Days past due
20

 
9

 
29

 
21

 
9

 
30

Greater than 120 days past due
36

 
27

 
63

 
52

 
29

 
81

Total past due
763

 
91

 
854

 
953

 
101

 
1,054

Current
38,482

 
9,985

 
48,467

 
37,287

 
8,641

 
45,928

Consumer finance receivables
$
39,245

 
$
10,076

 
$
49,321

 
$
38,240

 
$
8,742

 
$
46,982

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-Consumer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total past due
$
28

 
$
39

 
$
67

 
$
29

 
$
11

 
$
40

Current
21,287

 
8,400

 
29,687

 
20,537

 
7,889

 
28,426

Non-Consumer finance receivables
21,315

 
8,439

 
29,754

 
20,566

 
7,900

 
28,466

  Total recorded investment
$
60,560

 
$
18,515

 
$
79,075

 
$
58,806

 
$
16,642

 
$
75,448



Credit Quality

Consumer. When originating all classes of consumer receivables, we use a proprietary scoring system that measures the credit quality of the receivables using several factors, such as credit bureau information, consumer credit risk scores (e.g., FICO score), and contract characteristics. In addition to our proprietary scoring system, we consider other individual consumer factors, such as employment history, financial stability, and capacity to pay.

Subsequent to origination, we review the credit quality of our retail financing receivables based on customer payment activity. As each customer develops a payment history, we use an internally-developed behavioral scoring model to assist in determining the best collection strategies which allows us to focus collection activity on higher-risk accounts. These models are used to refine our risk-based staffing model to ensure collection resources are aligned with portfolio risk. Based on data from this scoring model, contracts are categorized by collection risk. Our collection models evaluate several factors, including origination characteristics, updated credit bureau data, and payment patterns.

Credit quality ratings for our consumer receivables are based on our aging analysis. Refer to aging table above. Consumer receivables credit quality ratings are as follows:

Pass current to 60 days past due
Special Mention61 to 120 days past due and in intensified collection status
Substandardgreater than 120 days past due and for which the uncollectible portion of the receivables has already been charged-off, as measured using the fair value of collateral




NOTE 2. FINANCE RECEIVABLES (Continued)

Non-Consumer. We extend credit to dealers primarily in the form of lines of credit to purchase new Ford and Lincoln vehicles as well as used vehicles. Payment is required when the dealer has sold the vehicle. Each non-consumer lending request is evaluated by taking into consideration the borrower’s financial condition and the underlying collateral securing the loan. We use a proprietary model to assign each dealer a risk rating. This model uses historical dealer performance data to identify key factors about a dealer that we consider most significant in predicting a dealer’s ability to meet its financial obligations. We also consider numerous other financial and qualitative factors of the dealer’s operations including capitalization and leverage, liquidity and cash flow, profitability, and credit history with Ford Credit and other creditors. A dealer’s risk rating does not reflect any guarantees or a dealer owner’s net worth.

Dealers are assigned to one of four groups according to risk ratings as follows:

Group I – strong to superior financial metrics
Group II – fair to favorable financial metrics
Group III – marginal to weak financial metrics
Group IV – poor financial metrics, including dealers classified as uncollectible

We suspend credit lines and extend no further funding to dealers classified in Group IV.

We regularly review our model to confirm the continued business significance and statistical predictability of the factors and update the model to incorporate new factors or other information that improves its statistical predictability. In addition, we regularly audit dealer inventory and dealer sales records to verify that the dealer is in possession of the financed vehicles and is promptly paying each receivable following the sale of the financed vehicle. The frequency of on-site vehicle inventory audits depends on the dealer’s risk rating. Under our policies, on-site vehicle inventory audits of low-risk dealers are conducted only as circumstances warrant in North America and at least annually internationally, and audits of higher risk dealers are conducted with increased frequency based on risk ratings worldwide. We perform a credit review of each dealer at least annually and adjust the dealer’s risk rating, if necessary.

The credit quality of non-consumer receivables is evaluated based on our internal dealer risk rating analysis. A dealer has the same risk rating for its entire dealer financing regardless of the type of financing.
 
The credit quality analysis of our dealer financing receivables was as follows (in millions):
 
September 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
North America
 
International
 
Total
 
North America
 
International
 
Total
Dealer financing
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Group I
$
17,075

 
$
5,370

 
$
22,445

 
$
16,591

 
$
4,822

 
$
21,413

Group II
2,970

 
2,059

 
5,029

 
2,608

 
1,390

 
3,998

Group III
349

 
603

 
952

 
277

 
1,277

 
1,554

Group IV
1

 
33

 
34

 
18

 
7

 
25

Total recorded investment
$
20,395

 
$
8,065

 
$
28,460

 
$
19,494

 
$
7,496

 
$
26,990
















NOTE 2. FINANCE RECEIVABLES (Continued)

Impaired Receivables

Impaired consumer receivables include accounts that have been rewritten or modified in reorganization proceedings pursuant to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code that are considered to be Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”), as well as all accounts greater than 120 days past due. Impaired non-consumer receivables represent accounts with dealers that have weak or poor financial metrics or dealer financing that has been modified in TDRs. The recorded investment of consumer receivables that were impaired at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $424 million, or 0.9% of consumer receivables, and $422 million, or 0.9% of consumer receivables, respectively. The recorded investment of non-consumer receivables that were impaired at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $58 million, or 0.2% of non-consumer receivables, and $47 million, or 0.2% of non-consumer receivables, respectively. Impaired finance receivables are evaluated both collectively and specifically. See Note 4 for additional information related to the development of our allowance for credit losses.

Non-Accrual Receivables

The accrual of revenue is discontinued at the earlier of the time a receivable is determined to be uncollectible, at bankruptcy status notification, or greater than 120 days past due. Accounts may be restored to accrual status only when a customer settles all past-due deficiency balances and future payments are reasonably assured. For receivables in non-accrual status, subsequent financing revenue is recognized only to the extent a payment is received. Payments are generally applied first to outstanding interest and then to the unpaid principal balance.

The recorded investment of consumer receivables in non-accrual status was $249 million, or 0.5% of our consumer receivables, at September 30, 2013, and $304 million, or 0.6% of our consumer receivables, at December 31, 2012. The recorded investment of non-consumer receivables in non-accrual status was $34 million, or 0.1% of our non-consumer receivables, at September 30, 2013, and $29 million, or 0.1% of our non-consumer receivables, at December 31, 2012.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

A restructuring of debt constitutes a TDR if we grant a concession to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties that we otherwise would not consider. Consumer and non-consumer contracts that have a modified interest rate that is below the market rate and those modified in reorganization proceedings pursuant to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, except non-consumer loans that are current with minimal risk of loss, are considered to be TDRs. We do not grant concessions on the principal balance of our loans. If a contract is modified in a reorganization proceeding, all payment requirements of the reorganization plan need to be met before remaining balances are forgiven. The outstanding recorded investment at time of modification for consumer receivables that are considered to be TDRs was $171 million, or 0.3%, and $185 million, or 0.4%, of our consumer receivables, during the periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The annualized subsequent default rate of TDRs that were previously modified in TDRs within the last twelve months and resulted in repossession for consumer contracts was 6.0% and 5.7% of TDRs at September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. There were no non-consumer loans involved in TDRs during the period ended September 30, 2013 and the outstanding recorded investment of non-consumer loans involved in TDRs was de minimis during the period ended September 30, 2012.

Finance receivables involved in TDRs are specifically assessed for impairment. An impairment charge is recorded as part of the provision to the allowance for credit losses for the amount that the recorded investment of the receivable exceeds its estimated fair value. Estimated fair value is based on either the present value of the expected future cash flows of the receivable discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate, or for loans where foreclosure is probable, the fair value of the collateral adjusted for estimated costs to sell. The allowance for credit losses related to all active consumer TDRs was $22 million and $18 million at September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The allowance for credit losses related to all active non-consumer TDRs was de minimis at September 30, 2013 and 2012.