DEF 14A 1 a2231095zdef14a.htm DEF 14A

Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

Ford Motor Company

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        
 
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        
 
    (5)   Total fee paid:
        
 

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
 
    (3)   Filing Party:
        
 
    (4)   Date Filed:
        
 

Table of Contents

Notice of 2017 Virtual Annual Meeting
of Shareholders and Proxy Statement

GRAPHIC

Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Daylight Savings Time
Virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Online Meeting Only — No Physical Meeting Location


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC   Ford Motor Company
One American Road
Dearborn, Michigan 48126-2798

GRAPHIC

Dear Shareholders:

It is my pleasure to inform you that our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be conducted online on Thursday, May 11, 2017. The virtual nature of the meeting will enable us to increase shareholder accessibility, while improving meeting efficiency and reducing costs.

Ford Motor Company joins a growing list of forward-looking companies conducting virtual annual meetings, including JetBlue, Hilton Worldwide, and PayPal — just to name a few.

Shareholders will be able to listen, vote and submit questions from their home or any remote location with internet connectivity. Information on how to participate in this year's virtual meeting can be found on page 83.

While our industry is changing faster than it has in the last 100 years, we know that our fundamental mission of making people's lives better remains the same. For us, that means continuing to make great cars, SUVs and trucks, and also embracing emerging opportunities to move people in new ways. In 2016, we made significant progress towards both goals.

We delivered a substantial profit and achieved our seventh consecutive year of solid earnings and positive operating-related cash flow. In our core automotive business, we maintained our strong momentum by launching 11 new vehicles in 2016. We also announced that we will be adding 13 new electrified vehicle nameplates globally to our product portfolio in the next five years.

As the auto industry enters a new era of connectivity and smart mobility, we also are developing new ways to move people and things. That's because mobility can impact every facet of our lives.

To address mobility-related challenges, we launched Ford Smart Mobility LLC, a new subsidiary formed to design, build, grow and invest in emerging mobility services. Our crowd-sourced shuttle service, Chariot, also is providing new transportation options in select U.S. cities and will continue to expand.

We also strengthened our leadership in bringing self-driving vehicles to market by announcing our next-generation Fusion Hybrid autonomous development vehicle and expanding our autonomous vehicle test fleet. This year, we will further expand the fleet and begin testing in Europe as well. Earlier this year, we also announced our investment in an artificial intelligence company, which will further advance our autonomous vehicle development and production efforts.

We know, however, that meeting these challenges takes more than just launching new products. That is why we established our City Solutions team, the only one of its kind in the auto industry, to work with municipalities to propose, pilot and develop mobility solutions tailored to individual communities.

These, and all our other smart mobility efforts, will help us preserve and promote mobility by solving transportation challenges worldwide for future generations. We view it as both an exciting opportunity and a big responsibility.

Our Board of Directors and entire leadership team continue to focus on delivering business results in the present, while creating value and opportunity for the future. Through our products and services, investments and philanthropy, and the contributions of our employees, we are strengthening communities and improving people's lives around the world.

Thank you for your continued support.

March 31, 2017

/s/ William Clay Ford, Jr.


William Clay Ford, Jr.
Chairman of the Board


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

Notice of Virtual Annual Meeting of
Shareholders of Ford Motor Company

Thursday, May 11, 2017
8:30 a.m., Eastern Daylight Savings Time

This year's virtual annual meeting will begin promptly at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Daylight Savings Time. If you plan to participate in the virtual meeting, please see the instructions on page 83 of the attached Proxy Statement. Shareholders will be able to listen, vote, and submit questions from their home or from any remote location that has Internet connectivity. There will be no physical location for shareholders to attend. Shareholders may only participate online by logging in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FORD.

ITEMS OF BUSINESS:

1.
The election of the 14 director nominees named in the Proxy Statement.

2.
The ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Ford's independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.

3.
A non-binding shareholder advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Named Executives.

4.
A non-binding shareholder advisory vote on the frequency of a shareholder vote to approve the compensation of the Named Executives.

5.
Consideration of the two shareholder proposals set forth in the Proxy Statement.

If you were a shareholder at the close of business on March 15, 2017, then you are eligible to vote at this year's annual meeting.

Please read these materials so that you will know which items of business we intend to cover during the meeting. Also, please either sign and return the accompanying proxy card in the postage-paid envelope or instruct us by telephone or online as to how you would like your shares voted. This will allow your shares to be voted as you instruct even if you cannot participate in the meeting. Instructions on how to vote your shares by telephone or online are on the proxy card enclosed with the Proxy Statement.

Please see Other Items and the Questions and Answers section beginning on page 79 for important information about the proxy materials, voting, the virtual annual meeting, Company documents, communications, and the deadline to submit shareholder proposals for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareowners.

Shareholders are being notified of the Proxy Statement and the form of proxy beginning March 31, 2017.

March 31, 2017

Dearborn, Michigan

/s/ Jonathan E. Osgood


Jonathan E. Osgood
Secretary

We urge each shareowner to promptly sign and return the enclosed proxy card or to use telephone or online voting. See our Questions and Answers beginning on page 80 about the virtual meeting and voting section for information about voting by telephone or online and how to revoke a proxy.

NOTICE OF VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

i


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

  1

Corporate Governance

 
10

Corporate Governance Principles

  10

Our Governance Practices

  10

Leadership Structure

  11

Board Meetings, Composition, and Committees

  11

Board's Role in Risk Management

  13

Independence of Directors and Relevant Facts and Circumstances

  16

Codes of Ethics

  18

Communications with the Board and Annual Meeting Attendance

  18

Beneficial Stock Ownership

  19

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

  21

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

  21

Proposal 1. Election of Directors

 
24

Director Compensation in 2016

  32

Proposal 2. Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 
34

Audit Committee Report

  34

Proposal 3. Approval of the Compensation of the Named Executives

 
36

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) Roadmap

 
37

Executive Compensation

 
38

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CD&A)

  38

Performance

  39

Compensation Determination

  42

Risk and Governance

  47

NEO Compensation

  49

2016 Say-on-Pay

  59

Say-on-Pay Approval

  59

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

  60

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

  60

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

  61

Summary Compensation Table

  61

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2016

  63

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016 Fiscal Year-End

  64

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2016

  66

Pension Benefits in 2016

  66

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2016

  68

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

  69

Equity Compensation Plan Information

  72

Proposal 4. Say When on Pay

 
73

Shareholder Proposals

 
74

Proposal 5. Shareholder Proposal

  74

Proposal 6. Shareholder Proposal

  77

Other Items

 
79

Questions and Answers About the Proxy Materials

 
80

Instructions for the Virtual Annual Meeting

 
83

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

This summary highlights information contained in this Proxy Statement. It does not contain all of the information you should consider. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting. Please see the Questions and Answers section beginning on page 80 for important information about proxy materials, voting, the virtual annual meeting, Company documents, and communications.

TIME OF VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING


Thursday, May 11, 2017
8:30 a.m., Eastern Daylight Savings Time
We will hold a virtual annual meeting of shareholders. Shareholders may participate online by logging onto www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FORD. There will not be a physical meeting location.

 


Corporate Website:
www.corporate.ford.com
Annual Report:
www.annualreport.ford.com

MEETING AGENDA

VOTING MATTERS
  Board
Recommendations

  Pages
 

Election of the 14 Director Nominees Named in the Proxy Statement

  FOR     24-33  

Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 
FOR
   
34-35
 

Approval of the Compensation of the Named Executives

 
FOR
   
36-72
 

Approval of the Frequency of Providing Shareholders with an Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of the Named Executives

 
ONE YEAR
   
73
 

Shareholder Proposal — Give Each Share an Equal Vote

 
AGAINST
   
74-76
 

Shareholder Proposal — Lobbying Disclosure

 
AGAINST
   
77-78
 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Lead Independent Director

Independent Board Committees — Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance

Committee Charters

Independent Directors Meet Regularly Without Management and Non-Independent Directors

Regular Board and Committee Self-Evaluation Process

Separate Chairman of the Board and CEO

Confidential Voting

Shareholders Have the Right to Call Special Meetings

Shareholders May Take Action by Written Consent

Strong Code of Ethics

Annual Election of All Directors

Majority Vote Standard — No Supermajority Voting Requirement

Board Meetings in 2016: 7

Standing Board Committees (Meetings in 2016): Audit (10), Compensation (7), Finance (4), Nominating and Governance (5), Sustainability and Innovation (4)

79% of the Director Nominees are Independent

PROXY SUMMARY

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

1


Table of Contents

DIRECTOR NOMINEES   GRAPHIC
                                                 
      AGE
DIRECTOR SINCE
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION



    QUALIFICATIONS
    COMMITTEES
    OTHER BOARDS
 
                                                 
 
    
                                               
Stephen G. Butler
Independent
     
69
2004
Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, KPMG, LLP and retired Chairman of KPMG International
 
          GRAPHIC
          Audit (Chair)
Nominating & Governance
          ConAgra Brands, Inc    
                                                    
Kimberly A. Casiano
Independent
     
59
2003
President, Kimberly Casiano & Associates, San Juan, Puerto Rico
 
          GRAPHIC
          Audit
Nominating & Governance
Sustainability & Innovation
          Mead Johnson Nutrition Company
Mutual of America
   
                                                    
Anthony F. Earley, Jr.
Independent
     
67
2009
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors, PG&E Corporation
 
          LOGO
          Compensation (Chair)
Nominating & Governance
Sustainability & Innovation
          PG&E Corporation    
                                                    
Mark Fields      
56
2014
President and Chief Executive Officer, Ford Motor Company
 
          GRAPHIC
          Finance           International Business Machines Corporation    
                                                    
Edsel B. Ford II      
68
1988
Consultant, Ford Motor Company
 
          GRAPHIC
          Finance
Sustainability & Innovation
               
                                                    
William Clay Ford, Jr.      
59
1988
Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Ford Motor Company
 
          GRAPHIC
          Finance (Chair)
Sustainability & Innovation
               
                                                    
William W. Helman IV
Independent
     
58
2011
General Partner, Greylock Partners
 
          GRAPHIC
          Finance
Nominating & Governance
Sustainability & Innovation (Chair)
               
                                                    
Jon M. Huntsman, Jr.
Independent
     
57
2012
Chairman, Atlantic Council and Chairman, Huntsman Cancer Foundation
 
          GRAPHIC
          Compensation
Nominating & Governance
Sustainability & Innovation
          Caterpillar, Inc.
Chevron Corporation
Hilton Worldwide Inc.
   
                                                    
William E. Kennard
Independent
     
60
2015
Chairman, Velocitas Partners LLC
 
          GRAPHIC
          Finance
Nominating & Governance
Sustainability & Innovation
          AT&T Inc.
MetLife, Inc.
Duke Energy Corporation
   
                                                    
John C. Lechleiter
Independent
     
63
2013
Chairman, Eli Lilly and Company
 
          GRAPHIC
          Compensation
Nominating & Governance
          Eli Lilly and Company
Nike, Inc.
   
                                                    
Ellen R. Marram
Lead Independent Director
     
70
1988
President, The Barnegat Group, LLC
 
          GRAPHIC
          Compensation
Nominating & Governance
Sustainability & Innovation
          The New York Times Company
Eli Lilly and Company
   
                                                    
John L. Thornton
Independent
     
63
1996
Chairman, Barrick Gold Corporation
 
          GRAPHIC
          Compensation
Finance
Nominating & Governance
          Barrick Gold Corporation    
                                                    
Lynn M. Vojvodich
Independent
     
49
2017
Former Executive Vice President & Chief Marketing Officer, Salesforce
 
          GRAPHIC
          Audit
Nominating & Governance
Sustainability & Innovation
          The Priceline Group Inc.    
                                                    
John S. Weinberg
Independent
     
60
2016
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Executive Chairman, Evercore Partners Inc.
 
          GRAPHIC
          Finance
Nominating & Governance
Sustainability & Innovation
          Evercore Partners Inc.    
                                                    
*
Due to Gerald L. Shaheen not standing for election at the 2017 Annual Meeting, a new chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee will be elected at the Board of Directors meeting in May 2017.

2

PROXY SUMMARY

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents


CD&A Roadmap

GRAPHIC

*
See pages 25, 82, and 83 of Ford's 2016 Form 10-K for definitions and reconciliations to GAAP.

PROXY SUMMARY

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

3


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

LOGO

LOGO

2016 — ANOTHER STRONG YEAR

GRAPHIC   TOTAL COMPANY NET INCOME | $4.6 billion   GRAPHIC   AUTOMOTIVE SEGMENT OPERATING MARGIN | 6.7%
Second highest since at least the 1990s
GRAPHIC   TOTAL COMPANY ADJUSTED PRE-TAX PROFIT* | $10.4 billion   GRAPHIC   AUTOMOTIVE SEGMENT OPERATING CASH FLOW | $6.4 billion
Second best level since at least 2001
GRAPHIC   TOTAL COMPANY REVENUE | $151.8 billion
Automotive segment revenue highest since 2007
  GRAPHIC   VOLUME | 6.651 million
Highest wholesale volume since 2005

 

*   See pages 25, 82, and 83 of Ford's 2016 Form 10-K for definitions and reconcilications to GAAP.           

4

PROXY SUMMARY

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

Table of Contents

STRONG FOUNDATION IN PLACE TO GROW BUSINESS

The information in this Performance Section shows we have a strong core business that continues to deliver impressive results over a sustained time period. In order to create greater value for our stakeholders, it is important we use that strong foundation to take advantage of emerging growth opportunities. The graphics below show some of our achievements and plans in our core business and emerging opportunities.

CORE BUSINESS   EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES
GRAPHIC   Launched 11 global products in 2016, including first all-new F-Series Super Duty in 18 years, the flagship Lincoln Continental, and Focus RS   GRAPHIC   In 2016, we expanded our autonomous test fleet from 10 to 30 vehicles. In 2017, we plan to further expand the fleet and begin testing in Europe
GRAPHIC   In 2016, Ford was America's best-selling vehicle brand for the seventh consecutive year   GRAPHIC   Acquired Chariot, a crowd-sourced shuttle company that has operations in two U.S. cities and plans to expand to eight cities by the end of the year, including one outside the U.S.
GRAPHIC   Lincoln global sales up 24% year-over-year, up 10% in the U.S., and nearly triple in China   GRAPHIC   Plan to bring to market 13 new electrified products within the next five years, including versions of the F-150 and Mustang
GRAPHIC   On track to deliver 12 new performance vehicles by the end of the decade, including the all-new Raptor and Ford GT   GRAPHIC   Ford awarded the most U.S. patents of any automotive manufacturer in 2016
GRAPHIC   Improved market share in Asia Pacific driven by China   GRAPHIC   Announced investment in an artificial intelligence company to augment our intention to bring to market Level 4 autonomous vehicles in 2021

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

PROXY SUMMARY

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

5


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

Underlying our compensation programs is an emphasis on sound governance practices. These practices include:

WE DO

GRAPHIC   Perform annual say-on-pay advisory vote for stockholders
GRAPHIC   Pay for performance
GRAPHIC   Use appropriate peer group when establishing compensation
GRAPHIC   Balance short- and long-term incentives
GRAPHIC   Align executive compensation with stockholder returns through long-term incentives
GRAPHIC   Cap individual payouts in incentive plans
GRAPHIC   Include clawback policy in our incentive plans
GRAPHIC   Maintain robust stock ownership goals for executives
GRAPHIC   Condition grants of long-term incentive awards on non-competition and non-disclosure restrictions
GRAPHIC   Mitigate undue risk taking in compensation programs
GRAPHIC   Include criteria in incentive plans to maximize tax deductibility
GRAPHIC   Retain a fully independent external compensation consultant whose independence is reviewed annually by the Committee (see Corporate Governance — Compensation Committee Operations on pp. 15-16)
GRAPHIC   Include a double-trigger change-in-control provision for equity grants (see Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2016 Say-on-Pay on p. 59)

WE DO NOT

GRAPHIC   Provide evergreen employment contracts
GRAPHIC   Pay dividend equivalents on unvested equity awards for executive officers
GRAPHIC   Maintain individual change-in-control agreements for Named Executives
GRAPHIC   Reprice options

6

PROXY SUMMARY

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

                                                             
  
Element
    
    BASE SALARY
    ANNUAL CASH
INCENTIVE AWARDS


    LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE AWARDS


    BENEFITS AND
PERQUISITES


    RETIREMENT PLANS
 
                                                             
                                                                
  
Purpose
    
      Base Level of
Compensation
          Incentive to Drive
Near-Term Performance
          Incentive to Drive Long-
Term Performance and
Stock Price Growth
          Enhance Productivity
and Development
          Income Certainty and
Security
   
                                                                
  
Target
    
      Fixed $           Fixed % of Salary           Fixed $ Value Equity
Opportunity
          Fixed $           % of Salary    
                                                                
 
Form of Delivery
    
      Cash           Cash           Performance Units
and
Time-Based Units
          Various           Cash    
                                                                
Company
Performance/
Award
      NA           0-200%           Performance Units*
0-200%
          NA           NA    
*
An award of the right to earn up to a certain number of shares of common stock, Restricted Stock Units, or cash, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock or Restricted Stock Units, based on performance against specified goals established by the Compensation Committee under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. A Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit ("Time-Based Unit") means the right to receive a share of common stock, or cash equivalent to the value of a share of common stock, when the restriction period ends, under the Long-Term Incentive Plan, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

GRAPHIC

At the 2016 Annual Meeting, we asked you to approve the compensation of the Named Executives as presented in our 2016 Proxy Statement. You approved the compensation of the Named Executives with 96.9% of the votes cast "For" approval. This result was consistent with the 2015 Say-on-Pay results, which had an approval rate of 97.1%. We are pleased that investors support our compensation philosophy, policies, and programs.

We met with institutional investors in the autumn of 2015 and 2016 to discuss corporate governance topics and any executive compensation related concerns. In general, investors were pleased with the changes we made to our compensation programs in 2015 and did not note any additional concerns.

As we noted in our 2015 CD&A, the Compensation Committee decided to modify our change-in-control provisions of our equity awards. Beginning in 2016, the Committee modified the terms and conditions applicable to equity based awards so that upon a change in control of the Company where Ford is not the surviving entity, unvested awards will terminate if such awards have been replaced by comparable awards from the acquiring corporation, unless any recipient is terminated or there is a reduction in an executive's responsibilities as of the date of the change in control. In those cases, or in the event awards are not replaced with comparable awards, such unvested awards will vest immediately prior to the change in control. The Committee adopted this change in order to bring our provisions in line with market practice and shareholder preferences.

PROXY SUMMARY

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

7


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

Named Executives' compensation is tied to our 2016 performance

80% of our Named Executives' target compensation is performance-based

Executive pay practices are tied to robust risk and control features
Executive stock ownership guidelines continue to align the interests of executives with shareholders

We continued a modest share buyback program to offset the dilutive effect of our equity compensation plans

We listened to shareholder feedback and made significant changes to our 2015 Performance Unit program that addressed investor concerns

GRAPHIC

8

PROXY SUMMARY

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

Ford has a philosophy of engagement, communication, and transparency with shareholders, which includes:

Meeting with equity and fixed income investors — during 2016, we met with equity investors at twelve conferences and six roadshows, and we met with fixed income investors at eleven conferences and six roadshows. We hosted quarterly earnings calls, two CFO Let's Chat events, a Ford University call, and an Investor Day. We also provided engagement through several additional phone calls, meetings, and auto and consumer electronics show tours throughout the year, and conducted an investor perception survey with a third-party vendor.

Continuing our philosophy of promoting greater communications with our institutional shareholders on corporate governance issues, we met with a number of our largest investors to discuss corporate governance. We found these meetings to be informative, and we continue to incorporate many of their suggestions into our Proxy Statement and communications strategy.

GRAPHIC

The Board of Directors is soliciting proxies to be used at the annual meeting of shareholders. This Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy are being made available to shareholders beginning March 31, 2017.

PROXY SUMMARY

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

9

Table of Contents


Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance Principles

The Nominating and Governance Committee developed and recommended to the Board a set of corporate governance principles, which the Board adopted. Ford's Corporate Governance Principles may be found on its website at www.corporate.ford.com. These principles include: a limitation on the number of boards on which a director may serve, qualifications for directors (including a requirement that directors be prepared to resign from the Board in the event of any significant

change in their personal circumstances that could affect the discharge of their responsibilities), director orientation and continuing education, and a requirement that the Board and each of its Committees perform an annual self-evaluation. Shareholders may obtain a printed copy of the Company's Corporate Governance Principles by writing to our Shareholder Relations Department at Ford Motor Company, Shareholder Relations, P.O. Box 6248 Dearborn, MI 48126.

Our Governance Practices

GRAPHIC

Ford has a long history of operating under sound corporate governance practices, which is a critical element of our success creating profitable growth for all. These practices include the following:

GRAPHIC   Annual Election of All Directors.

GRAPHIC

 

Majority Vote Standard. Each director must be elected by a majority of votes cast.

GRAPHIC

 

Independent Board. 79% of the Director Nominees are independent.

GRAPHIC

 

Lead Independent Director. Ensures management is adequately addressing the matters identified by the Board.

GRAPHIC

 

Independent Board Committees. Each of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance committees is comprised entirely of independent directors.

GRAPHIC

 

Committee Charters. Each standing committee operates under a written charter that has been approved by the Board.

GRAPHIC

 

Independent Directors Meet Regularly Without Management and Non-Independent Directors.

GRAPHIC

 

Regular Board and Committee Self-Evaluation Process. The Board and each committee evaluates its performance each year.
GRAPHIC   Mandatory Deferral of Compensation for Directors. In 2016, 60% of annual director fees were mandatorily deferred into Ford restricted stock units, which strongly links the interests of the Board with those of shareholders.

GRAPHIC

 

Separate Chairman of the Board and CEO. The Board of Directors has chosen to separate the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors.

GRAPHIC

 

Confidential Voting.

GRAPHIC

 

Special Meetings. Shareholders have the right to call a special meeting.

GRAPHIC

 

Shareholders May Take Action by Written Consent.

GRAPHIC

 

Strong Codes of Ethics. Ford is committed to operating its business with the highest level of integrity and has adopted codes of ethics that apply to all directors and senior financial personnel, and a code of conduct that applies to all employees.

10

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Leadership Structure

GRAPHIC

Ford determines the most suitable leadership structure from time to time. At present, the Board of Directors has chosen to separate the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mark Fields is our President and CEO, and William Clay Ford, Jr., is Chairman of the Board of Directors as well as our Executive Chairman. We believe this structure is optimal for Ford at this time because it allows Mr. Fields to focus on leading the organization while allowing Mr. Ford to focus on leading the Board of Directors. Furthermore, the Board has appointed Ellen R. Marram as our Lead Independent Director. We believe having a Lead Independent

Director is an important governance practice given that the Chairman of the Board, Mr. Ford, is not an independent director under our Corporate Governance Principles. The duties of the Lead Independent Director include:

chairing the executive sessions of our independent directors;

advising on the selection of Board Committee Chairs; and

working with Mr. Ford and Mr. Fields to ensure management is adequately addressing the matters identified by the Board.

This structure optimizes the roles of CEO, Chairman, and the Lead Independent Director and provides Ford with sound corporate governance in the management of its business.

Board Meetings, Composition, and Committees

GRAPHIC

COMPOSITION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS/NOMINEES

The Nominating and Governance Committee recommends the nominees for all directorships. The Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board on matters such as the size and composition of the Board in order to ensure the Board has the requisite expertise and its membership consists of persons with sufficiently diverse and independent backgrounds. Between annual shareholder meetings, the Board may elect directors to vacant Board positions to serve until the next annual meeting.

In consideration of Messrs. Hance and Shaheen not standing for election at the 2017 Annual Meeting, the Committee recommended that the size of the Board be kept at 14 directors.

The Board believes that it has an appropriate mix of short- and medium-tenured directors as well as long-tenured directors that provide a balance that enables the Board to benefit from fresh insights and historical perspective during its deliberations. In addition, the Board has managed succession planning effectively with strategic waivers of the mandatory retirement age where appropriate to maintain certain

expertise while new directors supplement the Board structure.

The Board proposes to you a slate of nominees for election to the Board at the annual meeting. You may propose nominees (other than self-nominations) for consideration by the Committee by submitting the names, qualifications, and other supporting information to: Secretary, Ford Motor Company, One American Road, Dearborn, MI 48126. Properly submitted recommendations must be received no later than December 1, 2017, to be considered by the Committee for inclusion in the following year's nominations for election to the Board. Your properly submitted candidates are evaluated in the same manner as those candidates recommended by other sources. All candidates are considered in light of the needs of the Board with due consideration given to the qualifications described on p. 24 under Election of Directors.

EXECUTIVE SESSIONS OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

Non-employee directors ordinarily meet in executive session without management present at most regularly scheduled Board meetings and may meet at other times at the discretion of the Lead Independent Director or at the request of any non-employee director. Additionally, all of the independent directors meet periodically (at least annually) without management or non-independent directors present.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

11


Table of Contents

BOARD COMMITTEES

Only independent directors serve on the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees, in accordance with the independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange LLC ("NYSE") Listed Company rules and the Company's Corporate Governance Principles. The Board, and each committee of the Board, has the authority to engage independent consultants and advisors at the Company's expense.

The Company has published on its website (www.corporate.ford.com) the charter of each of the Audit, Compensation, Finance, Nominating and Governance, and Sustainability and Innovation Committees of the Board. Printed copies of each of the committee charters are available by writing to our Shareholder Relations Department at Ford Motor Company, Shareholder Relations, P.O. Box 6248 Dearborn, MI 48126.

BOARD COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS

Audit Committee: Selects the independent registered public accounting firm, subject to shareholder ratification, and determines the compensation of the independent registered public accounting firm.

At least annually, reviews a report by the independent registered public accounting firm describing: internal quality control procedures, any issues raised by an internal or peer quality control review, any issues raised by a governmental or professional authority investigation in the past five years and any steps taken to deal with such issues, and (to assess the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm) all relationships between the independent registered public accounting firm and the Company.

Consults with the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews and approves the scope of their audit, and reviews their independence and performance. Also, annually approves of categories of services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm and reviews and, if appropriate, approves in advance any new proposed engagement greater than $250,000.

Reviews internal controls, accounting practices, and financial reporting, including the results of the annual audit and the review of the interim financial statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm.

Reviews activities, organization structure, and qualifications of the General Auditor's Office, and

participates in the appointment, dismissal, evaluation, and the determination of the compensation of the General Auditor.

Discusses earnings releases and guidance provided to the public and rating agencies.

Reviews, at least annually, policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.

Exercises reasonable oversight with respect to the implementation and effectiveness of the Company's compliance and ethics program, including being knowledgeable about the content and operation of such compliance and ethics program.

Reviews, with the Office of the General Counsel, any legal or regulatory matter that could have a significant impact on the financial statements.

As appropriate, obtains advice and assistance from outside legal, accounting, or other advisors.

Prepares an annual report of the Audit Committee to be included in the Company's proxy statement.

Assesses annually the adequacy of the Audit Committee Charter.

Reports to the Board of Directors about these matters.

Compensation Committee: Establishes and reviews the overall executive compensation philosophy and strategy of the Company.

Reviews and approves Company goals and objectives related to the Executive Chairman and the President and CEO and other executive officer compensation, including annual performance objectives.

Evaluates the performance of the Executive Chairman, the President and CEO, and other executive officers in light of established goals and objectives and, based on such evaluation, reviews and approves the annual salary, bonus, stock options, Performance Units, other stock-based awards, other incentive awards, and other benefits, direct and indirect, of the Executive Chairman, the President and CEO, and other executive officers.

Conducts a risk assessment of the Company's compensation policies and practices.

Considers and makes recommendations on Ford's executive compensation plans and programs.

Reviews the Compensation Discussion and Analysis to be included in the Company's proxy statement.

Prepares an annual report of the Compensation Committee to be included in the Company's proxy statement.

12

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Assesses annually the adequacy of the Compensation Committee Charter.

Reports to the Board of Directors about these matters.

Finance Committee: Reviews all aspects of the Company's policies and practices that relate to the management of the Company's financial affairs, consistent with law and specific instructions given by the Board of Directors.

Reviews with management, at least annually, the annual report from the Treasurer of the Company's cash and funding plans and other Treasury matters.

Reviews the strategy and performance of the Company's pension and other retirement and savings plans.

Performs such other functions and exercises such other powers as may be delegated to it by the Board of Directors from time to time.

Reviews, at least annually, policies with respect to financial risk assessment and financial risk management.

Assesses annually the adequacy of the Finance Committee Charter.

Reports to the Board of Directors about these matters.

Nominating and Governance Committee: Reviews and makes recommendations on: (i) the nominations or elections of directors; and (ii) the size, composition, and compensation of the Board.

Establishes criteria for selecting new directors and the evaluation of the Board. Develops and recommends to the Board corporate governance principles and guidelines. Reviews the charter and composition of each committee of the Board and makes recommendations to

the Board for the adoption of or revisions to the committee charters, the creation of additional committees, or the elimination of committees.

Considers the adequacy of the By-Laws and the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company and recommends to the Board, as appropriate, that the Board: (i) adopt amendments to the By-Laws, and (ii) propose, for consideration by the shareholders, amendments to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

Considers shareholder suggestions for nominees for director (other than self-nominations). See Composition of Board of Directors/Nominees on p. 11.

Assesses annually the adequacy of the Nominating and Governance Committee Charter.

Reports to the Board of Directors about these matters.

Sustainability and Innovation Committee: Evaluates and advises on the Company's pursuit of innovative practices and technologies that improve environmental and social sustainability, enrich our customers' experiences, and increase shareholder value.

Discusses and advises on the innovation strategies and practices used to develop and commercialize technologies.

Annually reviews the Company's Sustainability Report Summary and initiatives related to innovation.

Assesses annually the adequacy of the Sustainability and Innovation Committee Charter.

Reports to the Board of Directors about these matters.

Board's Role in Risk Management

GRAPHIC

The oversight responsibility of the Board and its Committees is supported by Company management and the risk management processes that are currently in place. Ford has extensive and effective risk management processes, relating specifically to compliance, reporting, operating, and strategic risks. Compliance Risk encompasses matters such as legal and regulatory compliance (e.g., Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, environmental, OSHA/safety, etc.). Reporting Risk covers Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, disclosure controls and procedures, and accounting compliance. Operating Risk

addresses the myriad of matters related to the operation of a complex company such as Ford (e.g., quality, supply chain, sales and service, financing and liquidity, product development and engineering, labor, etc.). Strategic Risk encompasses somewhat broader and longer-term matters, including, but not limited to, technology development, sustainability, capital allocation, management development, retention and compensation, competitive developments, and geopolitical developments.

We believe that key success factors in the risk management at Ford include a strong risk analysis tone set by the Board and senior management, which is shown through their commitment to effective top-down and bottom-up communication (including communication between management and the Board

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

13


Table of Contents

and Committees), and active cross-functional participation among the Business Units and Functional Skill Teams. More specifically, we have institutionalized the Creating Value Roadmap Process, which includes a Business Plan Review and Special Attention Review process where, on a weekly basis (and more often where circumstances dictate), the senior leadership of the Company from each of the Business Units and the Functional Skill Teams reviews the status of the business, the risks and opportunities presented to the business (once again in the areas of compliance, reporting, operating, and strategic risks), and develops specific plans to address those risks and opportunities. The Company has adopted a formal policy that requires the Creating Value Roadmap Process to be implemented by all Business Units and Functional Skill Teams. Our General Auditor's Office audits against the policies and procedures that have been adopted to support the Creating Value Roadmap Process. The Board of Directors recognizes the Creating Value Roadmap

Process as the Company's primary risk management tool, and the Audit Committee and the Board review annually the Creating Value Roadmap Process, the Company's adherence to it, and its effectiveness.

As noted above, the full Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the oversight of risk management at Ford and oversees operating risk management with reviews at each of its regular Board meetings. The Board of Directors has delegated responsibility for the oversight of specific areas of risk management to certain Committees of the Board, with each Board Committee reporting to the full Board following each Committee meeting. The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in overseeing compliance and reporting risk. The Board, the Sustainability and Innovation Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Finance Committee all play a role in overseeing strategic risk management.

OVERSIGHT OF RISK MANAGEMENT

 

 

COMPLIANCE & REPORTING

 

OPERATING & STRATEGIC
FORD BOARD
Oversight
  Audit Committee   Sustainability & Innovation Committee
Compensation Committee
Finance Committee
FORD MANAGEMENT
Day-to-Day
  Compliance Reviews
Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance
Internal Controls
Disclosure Committee
  Business Units & Skill Teams
Business Plan Review
Special Attention Review
Quality, Product, Strategy, and People Forums

RISK ASSESSMENT REGARDING COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES

We conducted an assessment of our compensation policies and practices, including our executive compensation programs, to evaluate the potential risks associated with these policies and practices. We reviewed and discussed the findings of the assessment with the Compensation Committee and concluded that our compensation programs are designed with an appropriate balance of risk and reward and do not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking behavior. As a result, we do not believe that risks relating to our compensation policies and practices for our employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

In conducting this review, we considered the following attributes of our programs:

mix of base salary, annual bonus opportunities, and long-term equity compensation, with performance-based equity compensation opportunities for officers;
alignment of annual and long-term incentives to ensure that the awards encourage consistent behaviors and incentivize performance results;

inclusion of non-financial metrics, such as quality, and other quantitative and qualitative performance factors in determining actual compensation payouts;

capped payout levels for both the Incentive Bonus Plan and performance-based stock awards for Named Executives — the Committee has negative discretion over incentive program payouts;

use of Time-Based Units and Performance Units that have a three-year performance period with performance measured against internal financial metrics (75% weighting) and relative Total Shareholder Return ("TSR") (25% weighting);

generally providing senior executives with long-term equity-based compensation on an annual basis — we believe that accumulating equity over a period of time encourages executives to take actions that promote the long-term sustainability of our business;

14

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

adopted a double-trigger change-in-control provision for equity grants starting in 2016; and

stock ownership goals that align the interests of the executive officers with those of our shareholders — this discourages executive officers from focusing on short-term results without regard to longer-term consequences.

Recoupment Policy. The Committee formally adopted a policy of recoupment of compensation in certain circumstances. The purpose of this policy is to help ensure executives act in the best interests of the Company. The policy requires any Company officer to repay or return cash bonuses and equity awards in the event: (i) the Company issues a material restatement of its financial statements, and the restatement was caused by such officer's intentional misconduct; (ii) such officer was found to be in violation of non-compete provisions of any plan or agreement; or (iii) such officer has committed ethical or criminal violations. The Committee will consider all relevant factors and exercise business judgment in determining any appropriate amounts to recoup up to 100% of any awards.

Our Compensation Committee considered compensation risk implications during its deliberations on the design of our executive compensation programs with the goal of appropriately balancing short-term incentives and long-term performance.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OPERATIONS

The Compensation Committee establishes and reviews our executive compensation philosophy and strategy and oversees our various executive compensation programs. The Committee is responsible for evaluating the performance of and determining the compensation for our Executive Chairman, the President and CEO, and other executive officers and approving the compensation structure for senior management, including officers. The Committee is comprised of five directors who are considered independent under the NYSE Listed Company rules and our Corporate Governance Principles. The Committee's membership is determined by our Board of Directors. The Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our Board of Directors. The Committee annually reviews the charter. A copy of the charter may be found on our website at www.corporate.ford.com.

The Committee makes decisions regarding the compensation of our officers that are Vice Presidents and above, including the Named Executives. The Committee has delegated authority, within prescribed share limits, to a Long-Term Incentive Compensation

Award Committee (comprised of William Clay Ford, Jr., and Mark Fields) to approve grants of options, Performance Units, Time-Based Units, and other stock-based awards, and to the Annual Incentive Compensation Award Committee to determine bonuses for other employees.

The Board of Directors makes decisions relating to non-employee director compensation. Any proposed changes are reviewed in advance and recommended to the Board by the Nominating and Governance Committee (see Director Compensation in 2016 on pp. 32-33).

The Compensation Committee considers recommendations from Mr. Ford, Mr. Fields, and the Group Vice President — Human Resources and Corporate Services, in developing compensation plans and evaluating performance of other executive officers. The Committee's consultant also provides advice and analysis on the structure and level of executive compensation. Final decisions on any major element of compensation, however, as well as total compensation for executive officers, are made by the Compensation Committee.

As in prior years, in 2016 the Committee engaged Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC, an independent compensation consulting firm, to advise the Committee on executive compensation and benefits matters. Semler Brossy is retained directly by the Committee, which has the sole authority to review and approve the budget of the independent consultant. Semler Brossy does not advise our management and receives no other compensation from us. The same Semler Brossy principal attended all seven of the Committee meetings in 2016.

The Committee has analyzed whether the work of Semler Brossy as a compensation consultant has raised any conflict of interest, taking into consideration the following factors: (i) the provision of other services to the Company by Semler Brossy; (ii) the amount of fees from the Company paid to Semler Brossy as a percentage of the firm's total revenue; (iii) Semler Brossy's policies and procedures that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationship of Semler Brossy or the individual compensation advisor employed by the firm with an executive officer of the Company; (v) any business or personal relationship of the individual compensation advisor with any member of the Committee; and (vi) any stock of the Company owned by Semler Brossy or the individual compensation advisor employed by the firm. The Committee has determined, based on its analysis of the above factors, that the work of Semler Brossy and the individual compensation advisor

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

15


Table of Contents

employed by Semler Brossy as compensation consultant to the Committee has not created any conflict of interest.

In addition, the Committee reviewed survey data provided by the Willis Towers Watson Executive Compensation Database (see Competitive Survey on pp. 44-45). Willis Towers Watson does not assist the Committee in determining or recommending compensation of executive officers. Willis Towers Watson is retained by Ford management, not the Committee.

Committee meetings typically occur prior to the meetings of the full Board of Directors. Bonus targets, bonus awards, Performance Unit grants, Time-Based Units, and cash awarded typically are decided at the February Committee meeting (see Timing of Awards on pp. 47-48). Officer salaries are reviewed in February each year.

See the Compensation Discussion and Analysis on pp. 38-59 for more detail on the factors considered by the Committee in making executive compensation decisions.

The Committee reviews our talent and executive development program with senior management. These reviews are conducted periodically and focus on

executive development and succession planning throughout the organization, at the Vice President level and above.

Our policy, approved by the Compensation Committee, to limit outside board participation by our officers, is:

no more than 15% of the officers should be on for-profit boards at any given point in time; and

no officer should be a member of more than one for-profit board.

AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT AND AUDITOR ROTATION

The Charter of the Audit Committee provides that a member of the Audit Committee generally may not serve on the audit committee of more than two other public companies. The Board has designated Stephen G. Butler as an Audit Committee financial expert. Mr. Butler meets the independence standards for audit committee members under the NYSE Listed Company and United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") rules. The lead partner of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm is rotated at least every five years.

Independence of Directors and Relevant Facts and Circumstances

GRAPHIC

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

A majority of the directors must be independent directors under the NYSE Listed Company rules. The NYSE rules provide that no director can qualify as independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the listed company. The Board has adopted the following standards in determining whether or not a director has a material relationship with the Company. These standards are contained in Ford's Corporate Governance Principles and may be found at the Company's website, www.corporate.ford.com.

Employee or Former Employee.  No director who is an employee or a former employee of the Company can be independent until three years after termination of such employment.

Independent Auditor Affiliation.  No director who is, or in the past three years has been, affiliated with or

employed by the Company's present or former independent auditor can be independent until three years after the end of the affiliation, employment, or auditing relationship.

Interlocking Directorship.  No director can be independent if he or she is, or in the past three years has been, part of an interlocking directorship in which an executive officer of the Company serves on the compensation committee of another company that employs the director.

Additional Compensation.  No director can be independent if he or she is receiving, or in the last three years has received, more than $100,000 during any 12-month period in direct compensation from the Company, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service).

Immediate Family Members.  Directors with immediate family members in the foregoing categories are subject to the same three-year restriction.

16

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Other Relationships.  The following commercial, charitable, and educational relationships will not be considered to be material relationships that would impair a director's independence:

(i)
Sales and Purchases of Products/Services. if within the preceding three years a Ford director was an executive officer or employee of another company (or an immediate family member of the director was an executive officer of such company) that did business with Ford and either: (a) the annual sales to Ford were less than the greater of $1 million or two percent of the total annual revenues of such company, or (b) the annual purchases from Ford were less than the greater of $1 million or two percent of the total annual revenues of Ford, in each case for any of the three most recently completed fiscal years;

(ii)
Indebtedness. if within the preceding three years a Ford director was an executive officer of another company which was indebted to Ford, or to which Ford was indebted, and either: (a) the total amount of such other company's indebtedness to Ford was less than two percent of the total consolidated assets of Ford, or (b) the total amount of Ford's indebtedness to such other company was less than two percent of the total consolidated assets of such other company, in each case for any of the three most recently completed fiscal years; and

(iii)
Charitable Contributions. if within the preceding three years a Ford director served as an executive officer, director, or trustee of a charitable or educational organization, and Ford's discretionary contributions to the organization were less than the greater of $1 million or two percent of that organization's total annual discretionary receipts for any of the three most recently completed fiscal years. (Any matching of charitable contributions will not be included in the amount of Ford's contributions for this purpose.)

Based on these independence standards and all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Board determined that none of the following directors had any material relationship with the Company and, thus, are independent: Stephen G. Butler, Kimberly A. Casiano, Anthony F. Earley, Jr., William W. Helman IV, Jon M. Huntsman, Jr., William E. Kennard, John C. Lechleiter, Ellen R. Marram, John L. Thornton, Lynn M. Vojvodich, and John S. Weinberg. Additionally, James P. Hackett, who resigned from the Board of Directors on March 10, 2016, and James H. Hance, Jr., and Gerald L. Shaheen, who will not stand for election at the 2017 Annual Meeting, were determined by the Board to have had no material relationships with the Company during the time of their service and, thus, were independent.

DISCLOSURE OF RELEVANT FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES

With respect to the independent directors listed above, the Board considered the following relevant facts and circumstances in making the independence determinations:

From time to time during the past three years, Ford purchased goods and services from, sold goods and services to, or financing arrangements were provided by, various companies with which certain directors were or are affiliated either as members of such companies' boards of directors or, in the case of Messrs. Earley, Hackett, and Weinberg, as an officer of such a company or, in the case of Gov. Huntsman, where an immediate family member serves as an officer of such a company. In addition to Messrs. Earley, Hackett, and Weinberg, and Gov. Huntsman, these directors included Mr. Hance, Mr. Helman, Mr. Kennard, Ms. Marram, and Mr. Thornton. The Company also made donations to certain institutions with which certain directors are affiliated. These included Ms. Casiano, Mr. Earley, Mr. Hackett, Dr. Lechleiter, and Mr. Thornton. None of the relationships described above was material under the independence standards contained in our Corporate Governance Principles.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

17


Table of Contents

Codes of Ethics

GRAPHIC

The Company has published on its website (www.corporate.ford.com) its code of conduct handbook, which applies to all officers and employees, a code of ethics for directors, and a code of ethics for the Company's chief executive officer as well as senior financial and accounting personnel. Any waiver of, or amendments to, the codes of ethics for directors or

executive officers, including the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, and the principal accounting officer, may be approved only by the Nominating and Governance Committee, and any such waivers or amendments will be disclosed promptly by the Company by posting such waivers or amendments to its website. The Nominating and Governance Committee also reviews management's monitoring of compliance with the Company's Code of Conduct. Printed copies of each of the codes of ethics referred to above are also available by writing to our Shareholder Relations Department at Ford Motor Company, Shareholder Relations, P.O. Box 6248 Dearborn, MI 48126.

Communications with the Board and Annual Meeting Attendance

GRAPHIC

The Board has established a process by which you may send communications to the Board as a whole, the non-employee Directors as a group, or the Lead Independent Director. You may send communications to our Directors, including any concerns regarding Ford's accounting, internal controls, auditing, or other matters, to the following address: Board of Directors (or Lead Independent Director or non-employee Directors as a group, as appropriate), Ford Motor Company, P.O. Box 685, Dearborn, MI 48126-0685. You may submit your concern anonymously or confidentially. You may also indicate whether you are a shareholder, customer, supplier, or other interested party.

Communications relating to the Company's accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters will be relayed to the Audit Committee. Communications relating to governance will be relayed to the Nominating and Governance Committee. All other communications will be referred to other areas of the Company for handling as appropriate under the facts and circumstances outlined in the communications. Responses will be sent to those that include a return address, as appropriate. You may also find a description of the manner in which you can send communications to the Board on the Company's website (www.corporate.ford.com).

All members of the Board are expected to participate in the annual meeting, unless unusual circumstances would prevent such attendance. Last year, of the fourteen then current members of the Board, thirteen attended the annual meeting.

18

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Beneficial Stock Ownership

FIVE PERCENT BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF COMMON STOCK

Pursuant to SEC filings, the Company was notified that as of December 31, 2016, the entities included in the table below had more than a 5% ownership interest of Ford common stock, or owned securities convertible into more than 5% ownership of Ford common stock, or owned a combination of Ford common stock and securities convertible into Ford common stock that could result in more than 5% ownership of Ford common stock.

 
   
   
   
   
   
 
  Name of Beneficial Owner
  Address of Beneficial Owner
  Ford
Common Stock

  Percent of
Outstanding Ford
Common Stock

   

 

State Street Corporation and certain of its affiliates*

  State Street Financial Center
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
  314,156,492   9.3%    

 

The Vanguard Group and certain of its affiliates

  The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
  255,916,473   6.6%    

 

BlackRock, Inc. and certain of its affiliates

  BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
  218,712,171   5.6%    

 

Evercore Trust Company, N.A.

  Evercore Trust Company, N.A.
55 East 52nd Street,
36th Floor
New York, NY 10055
  205,674,300   5.3%    
*
State Street Bank and Trust Company is the trustee for Ford common stock in the Ford defined contribution plans master trust, which beneficially owns 5.3% of the common stock of Ford. In this capacity, State Street Bank and Trust Company has voting power over the shares in certain circumstances.

FIVE PERCENT BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF CLASS B STOCK

As of February 1, 2017, the persons included in the table below beneficially owned more than 5% of the outstanding Class B Stock.

 
   
   
   
   
   
 
  Name
  Address
  Ford
Class B Stock

  Percent of
Outstanding Ford
Class B Stock

   
    Lynn F. Alandt   Ford Estates, 2000 Brush, Detroit, MI 48226   6,733,533   9.50%    
    David P. Larsen, as trustee of various trusts*   Ford Estates, 2000 Brush, Detroit, MI 48226   9,943,383   14.03%    
    Voting Trust**   Ford Estates, 2000 Brush, Detroit, MI 48226   69,004,451   97.39%    
*
Mr. Larsen disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.

**
These Class B Stock shares are held in a voting trust of which Edsel B. Ford II, William Clay Ford, Jr., Benson Ford, Jr., and Alfred B. Ford are the trustees. The trust is of perpetual duration until terminated by the vote of shares representing over 50% of the participants and requires the trustees to vote the shares as directed by a plurality of the shares in the trust.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

19

Table of Contents

DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE OFFICER BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

The following table shows how much Ford stock each current director, nominee, and Named Executive beneficially owned as of February 1, 2017. No director, nominee, or executive officer, including Named Executives, beneficially owned more than 0.15% of Ford's total outstanding common stock nor did any such person beneficially own more than 0.01% of Ford common stock units as of February 1, 2017. Executive officers held options exercisable on or within 60 days after February 1, 2017 to buy 11,869,565 shares of Ford common stock.

 

Name

  Ford
Common
Stock 1,2
  Ford
Common
Stock
Units 3
   

 

Stephen G. Butler*

  66,618   138,212    

 

Kimberly A. Casiano*

  40,654   129,448    

 

Anthony F. Earley, Jr.*

  74,944   58,249    

 

James D. Farley, Jr.

  859,041   0    

 

Mark Fields*

  4,653,818   9,144    

 

James H. Hance, Jr.**

  83,049   44,671    

 

William W. Helman IV*

  51,873   34,553    

 

Joseph R. Hinrichs

  1,106,322   912    

 

Jon M. Huntsman, Jr.*

  33,064   27,536    

 

William E. Kennard*

  22,282   0    

 

John C. Lechleiter*

  80,106   4,667    

 

Ellen R. Marram*

  53,360   224,236    

 

Gerald L. Shaheen**

  58,414   127,070    

 

Robert L. Shanks

  1,125,955   0    

 

John L. Thornton*

  95,552   267,724    

 

Lynn M. Vojvodich*

  0   0    

 

John S. Weinberg*

  5,191   0    


 

Name

  Ford
Common
Stock 1,2
  Ford
Common
Stock
Units 3
  Ford
Class B
Stock
  Percent of
Outstanding
Ford
Class B
Stock
   

 

Edsel B. Ford II*

  2,526,882   141,577   5,515,202   7.78%    

 

William Clay Ford, Jr.*

  6,035,025   96,490   12,509,545   17.66%    

 

All Directors and Executive Officers as a group
34 persons beneficially owned 0.547% of Ford common stock or securities convertible into Ford common stock as of February 1, 2017

  23,824,023   1,310,817   18,024,747   25.44%    
*
Indicates Director Nominees

**
Messrs. Hance and Shaheen are not standing for election at the 2017 Annual Meeting

1
For executive officers, included in the amounts for "All Directors and Executive Officers as a group" are Restricted Stock Units issued under the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("2008 Plan") as long-term incentive grants in 2016 and prior years for retention and other incentive purposes.

    In addition, amounts shown include Restricted Stock Units issued under the 2008 Plan as follows: 605,905 units for Mr. Fields; 246,797 units for Mr. Shanks; 540,918 units for William Clay Ford, Jr.; 227,879 units for Mr. Farley; and 251,287 units Mr. Hinrichs.

    In addition, amounts shown include Restricted Stock Units issued under the 2014 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Ford Motor Company ("2014 Plan") as follows: 60,618 units for Mr. Butler; 33,064 units for Ms. Casiano; 38,944 units for Mr. Earley; 22,519 for Mr. Hance; 33,064 for Mr. Huntsman; 22,282 units for Mr. Kennard; 55,106 units for Dr. Lechleiter; 33,064 units for Ms. Marram; 58,414 units for Mr. Shaheen; and 5,191 units for Mr. Weinberg.

    Included in the stock ownership shown in the table above: Edsel B. Ford II has disclaimed beneficial ownership of 61,401 shares of common stock and 1,710,487 shares of Class B Stock that are either held directly by his immediate family or by charitable funds which he controls. William Clay Ford, Jr., has disclaimed beneficial ownership of 55,798 shares of common stock and 2,393,363 shares of Class B Stock that are either held directly by members of his immediate family or indirectly by members of his immediate family in trusts in which Mr. Ford has no interest. Present directors and executive officers as a group have disclaimed beneficial ownership of a total of 117,199 shares of common stock and 4,103,850 shares of Class B Stock.

    No director or officer had pledged shares of common stock as security or hedged their exposure to common stock.

2
Also, on February 1, 2017 (or within 60 days after that date), the Named Executives and directors listed below have rights to acquire shares of common stock through the exercise of stock options under Ford's stock option plans (which amounts are included in the "Ford Common Stock" column), as follows:
 
   
   
   

 

Person

  Number of Shares    

 

James D. Farley, Jr.

  272,017    

 

Mark Fields

  2,473,124    

 

William Clay Ford, Jr.

  4,922,857    

 

Joseph R. Hinrichs

  342,664    

 

Robert L. Shanks

  468,636    
3
In general, these are common stock units credited under a deferred compensation plan and payable in cash and in the cases of William Clay Ford, Jr., Mark Fields, and Joseph R. Hinrichs, include stock units under a benefit equalization plan.

20

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based on Company records and other information, Ford believes that all SEC filing requirements applicable to its directors and executive officers were complied with for 2016 and prior years.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

GRAPHIC

POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Business transactions between Ford and its officers or directors, including companies in which a director or officer (or an immediate family member) has a substantial ownership interest or a company where such director or officer (or an immediate family member) serves as an executive officer ("related party transactions") are not prohibited. In fact, certain related party transactions can be beneficial to the Company and its shareholders.

It is important, however, to ensure that any related party transactions are beneficial to the Company. Accordingly, any related party transaction, regardless of amount, is submitted to the Nominating and Governance Committee in advance for review and approval. All existing related party transactions are reviewed at least annually by the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Office of the General Counsel reviews all such related party transactions, existing or proposed, prior to submission to the Nominating and Governance Committee, and our General Counsel opines on the appropriateness of each related party transaction. The Nominating and Governance Committee may, at its discretion, consult with outside legal counsel.

Any director or officer with an interest in a related party transaction is expected to recuse himself or herself from any consideration of the matter.

The Nominating and Governance Committee's approval of a related party transaction may encompass a series of subsequent transactions contemplated by the original approval, i.e., transactions contemplated by an ongoing business relationship occurring over a period of time. Examples include transactions in the normal course of business between the Company and a dealership owned by a director or an executive officer (or an immediate family member thereof), transactions in the normal

course of business between the Company and financial institutions with which a director or officer may be associated, and the ongoing issuances of purchase orders or releases against a blanket purchase order made in the normal course of business by the Company to a business with which a director or officer may be associated. In such instances, any such approval shall require that the Company make all decisions with respect to such ongoing business relationship in accordance with existing policies and procedures applicable to non-related party transactions (e.g., Company purchasing policies governing awards of business to suppliers, etc.).

In all cases, a director or officer with an interest in a related party transaction may not attempt to influence Company personnel in making any decision with respect to the transaction.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In February 2002, Ford entered into a Stadium Naming and License Agreement with The Detroit Lions, Inc. (the "Lions"), pursuant to which we acquired for $50 million, paid by us in 2002, the naming rights to a new domed stadium located in downtown Detroit at which the Lions began playing their home games during the 2002 National Football League season. We named the stadium "Ford Field." The term of the naming rights agreement is 25 years, which commenced with the 2002 National Football League season. Benefits to Ford under the naming rights agreement include exclusive exterior entrance signage and predominant interior promotional signage. Beginning in 2005, the Company also agreed to provide to the Lions, at no cost, eight new model year Ford, Lincoln, or Mercury brand vehicles manufactured by Ford in North America for use by the management and staff of Ford Field and the Lions and to replace such vehicles in each second successive year, for the remainder of the naming rights agreement. The cost incurred during 2016 was $141,098. William Clay Ford, Jr., is a minority owner and is a director and officer of the Lions.

In 2014, Ford entered into a Sponsorship Agreement with a wholly owned subsidiary of the Lions to be the exclusive title sponsor of an NCAA sanctioned, men's college football "Bowl" game to be played in each of the 2014-2016 seasons at Ford Field. We named the Bowl the "Quick Lane Bowl" for our Quick Lane

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

21


Table of Contents

Tire & Auto Center brand and acquired several broadcast television messages, event signage, and other advertising in exchange for a sponsorship fee. The cost incurred during 2016 was $662,000. In 2016, the Company extended its sponsorship of the Quick Lane Bowl for another three years to cover the 2017-2019 seasons.

Paul Alandt, Lynn F. Alandt's husband, is a minority owner of two Ford franchised dealerships and a Lincoln franchised dealership. In 2016, the dealerships paid Ford about $160.7 million for products and services in the ordinary course of business. In turn, Ford paid the dealerships about $30.8 million for services in the ordinary course of business. Also in 2016, Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, a wholly owned entity of Ford, provided about $242.3 million of financing to dealerships owned by Mr. Alandt and paid about $1.5 million to them in the ordinary course of business. The dealerships paid Ford Credit about $248.0 million in the ordinary course of business. Additionally, in 2016, Ford Credit purchased retail installment sales contracts and Red Carpet Leases from the dealerships in amounts of about $21.2 million and $112.0 million, respectively.

In March 2001, Marketing Associates, LLC, an entity in which Edsel B. Ford II has a majority interest, acquired all of the assets of the Marketing Associates Division of Lason Systems, Inc. Before the acquisition, the Marketing Associates Division of Lason Systems, Inc. provided various marketing and related services to the Company and this continued following the acquisition. In 2016, the Company paid Marketing Associates, LLC approximately $44.6 million for marketing and related services provided in the ordinary course of business.

In April 2016, the Company approved an investment of up to $10 million over five years in a venture capital fund that invests in next-generation mobility start-up entities. As of March 1, 2017, we have invested

$4.1 million. We believe our investment will yield several benefits including: (i) increased early exposure to possible mobility investments; (ii) the ability to invest directly in an entity whether or not the investment fund invests in the entity; and (iii) increased exposure to venture capital mobility expertise. At the time of our investment, William Clay Ford, Jr., had a 12.5% interest in the investment fund.

During 2016, the Company employed Henry Ford III, son of Edsel B. Ford II, as a manager in our global Marketing and Sales skill team. Henry Ford III received 2016 compensation of approximately $189,000 consisting primarily of salary, bonus, and stock awards.

Pursuant to SEC filings, the Company was notified that as of December 31, 2016, State Street Corporation, and its affiliate State Street Bank and Trust Company, State Street Financial Center, One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111, and certain of its affiliates, owned 9.3% of our common stock. During 2016, the Company paid State Street Corporation and its affiliates approximately $11.8 million in the ordinary course of business.

Pursuant to SEC filings, the Company was notified that as of December 31, 2016, BlackRock, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055, and certain of its affiliates, owned approximately 5.6% of the Company's common stock. During 2016, the Company paid BlackRock, Inc. approximately $6.3 million in the ordinary course of business.

Pursuant to SEC filings, the Company was notified that as of December 31, 2016, Evercore Trust Company, N.A., 55 East 52nd Street, 36th Floor, New York, NY 10055, owned approximately 5.3% of the Company's common stock. During 2016, the Company paid Evercore Trust Company, N.A. approximately $0.25 million in the ordinary course of business.

22

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

The following chart shows the process for identification and disclosure of related party transactions.

GRAPHIC

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

23

Table of Contents


Proposal 1. Election of Directors

IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTORS

The Charter of the Nominating and Governance Committee provides that the Committee conducts all necessary and appropriate inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates as directors. The Committee identifies candidates through a variety of means, including search firms, recommendations from members of the Committee and the Board, including the Executive Chairman and the President and CEO, and suggestions from Company management. The Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any search firm to be used to assist it in identifying and evaluating candidates to serve as directors of the Company. The Company on behalf of the Committee has paid fees to third-party firms to assist the Committee in the identification and evaluation of potential Board members.

Our newest directors are John S. Weinberg and Lynn M. Vojvodich. Mr. Weinberg was identified and proposed to the Committee by the Chairman. Upon recommendation of the Committee, the Board elected Mr. Weinberg on September 8, 2016, with his election effective on October 1, 2016.

Ms. Vojvodich was selected from among several names following a review by a search firm. Ms. Vojvodich was interviewed prior to her election by the Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Lead Independent Director, the Chairman, and the President and CEO. Upon recommendation of the Committee, the Board elected Ms. Vojvodich on March 9, 2017, with her election effective on April 1, 2017.

James H. Hance, Jr. and Gerald L. Shaheen, having reached our mandatory retirement age of 72, will not stand for election at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Fourteen directors will be elected at this year's annual meeting. Each director will serve until the next annual meeting or until he or she is succeeded by another qualified director who has been elected.

We will vote your shares as you specify when providing your proxy. If you do not specify how you want your shares voted when you provide your proxy, we will vote them for the election of all of the nominees listed below. If unforeseen circumstances (such as death or disability) make it necessary for the Board of Directors to substitute another person for any of the nominees, we will vote your shares for that other person.

QUALIFICATIONS CONSIDERED FOR NOMINEES

Because Ford is a large and complex company, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers numerous qualifications when considering candidates for the Board. In addition to the qualifications listed below, among the most important qualities directors should possess are the highest personal and professional ethical standards, integrity, and values. They should be committed to representing the long-term interests of all of the shareholders. Directors must also have practical wisdom and mature judgment. Directors must be objective and inquisitive. Ford recognizes the value of diversity, and we endeavor to have a diverse Board, with experience in business, international operations, finance, manufacturing and product development, marketing and sales, government, education, technology, and in areas that are relevant to the Company's global activities. The biographies of the nominees show that, taken as a whole, the current slate of director nominees possesses these qualifications. Directors must be willing to devote sufficient time to carrying out their duties and responsibilities effectively, including making themselves available for consultation outside of regularly scheduled Board meetings, and should be committed to serve on the Board for an extended period of time. Directors should also be prepared to offer their resignation in the event of any significant change in their personal circumstances that could affect the discharge of their responsibilities as directors of the Company, including a change in their principal job responsibilities.

Each of the nominees for director is now a member of the Board of Directors, which met seven times during 2016. Each of the nominees for director attended at least 75% of the combined Board and committee meetings held during the periods served by such nominee in 2016. The nominees provided the following information about themselves as of the latest practical date. Additionally, for each director nominee we have disclosed the particular experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills that led the Board to conclude that the nominee should serve as a director.

24

PROPOSAL 1. Election of Directors

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Stephen G. Butler

GRAPHIC  

Age: 69

Independent Director Since: 2004

Committees: Audit (Chair), Nominating and Governance

Experience: Mr. Butler served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KPMG, LLP from 1996 until he retired in 2002. Mr. Butler held a variety of management positions, both in the United States and internationally, during his 33-year career at KPMG.

Reasons for Nomination: Mr. Butler has extensive experience in the accounting profession, both in the United States and internationally, as well as executive leadership experience as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KPMG. Mr. Butler's financial expertise and risk management skills have been instrumental in guiding Ford through its restructuring, which continues to be important as the Company continues to grow. Mr. Butler brings valuable insight in strategic and client service innovations. He is credited with helping KPMG create a cohesive firm to effectively serve international clients. Mr. Butler's leadership skills, financial expertise, and international business experience add significant value to the goals of improving our balance sheet, fulfilling our financial reporting obligations, and identifying areas throughout the Company where we might create greater cohesiveness.

Current Public Company Directorships: ConAgra Brands, Inc.

Public Company Directorships Within the Past Five Years: Cooper Industries, PLC

Kimberly A. Casiano

GRAPHIC  

Age: 59

Independent Director Since: 2003

Committees: Audit, Nominating and Governance, Sustainability and Innovation

Experience: Ms. Casiano has been the President of Kimberly Casiano & Associates since 2010. Her firm provides advisory services in marketing, recruiting, communications, advocacy, and diversity to target the U.S. Hispanic market, the Caribbean, and Latin America. Ms. Casiano served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Casiano Communications, Inc., a Hispanic publisher of magazines and direct marketing company, from 1994 through 2009. She joined the company in 1987 and held various management positions. Ms. Casiano is a member of the Board of Directors of Scotiabank of Puerto Rico, the Hispanic Scholarship Fund, and the Latino Corporate Directors Association.

Reasons for Nomination: Ms. Casiano has extensive experience in marketing and sales, particularly in the U.S. Hispanic community and Latin America. Ms. Casiano consistently provides Ford with valuable insight in developing communications, marketing, and sales strategies supporting our goal of growing market share profitably.

Current Public Company Directorships: Mead Johnson Nutrition Company and Mutual of America

PROPOSAL 1. Election of Directors

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

25

Table of Contents

Anthony F. Earley, Jr.

GRAPHIC  

Age: 67

Independent Director Since: 2009

Committees: Compensation (Chair), Nominating and Governance, Sustainability and Innovation

Experience: As of March 1, 2017, Mr. Earley is the Executive Chairman of PG&E Corporation. Since September 2011, he served as the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President of PG&E Corporation. Before joining PG&E Corporation, Mr. Earley served in a number of executive leadership roles at DTE Energy including Executive Chairman, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Operating Officer. In addition, Mr. Earley served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Long Island Lighting Company. Mr. Earley also served as an officer in the United States Navy nuclear submarine program where he was qualified as a chief engineer officer.

Reasons for Nomination: Among other qualifications, Mr. Earley brings a wealth of executive leadership experience to the Board. His expertise in electrical infrastructure complements our plan by providing key insight into the development of innovative products such as the development of hybrid and electric vehicles our customers want and value. Mr. Earley's experiences as a senior executive also complement our plan by providing valuable insight into ways in which Ford can operate profitably at the current demand, while changing our product mix. Mr. Earley is a uniquely qualified leader who will help Ford continue to accelerate the goal of driving profitable growth for all.

Current Public Company Directorships: PG&E Corporation

Public Company Directorships Within the Past Five Years: Masco Corporation

Mark Fields

GRAPHIC  

Age: 56

Director Since: 2014

Committees: Finance

Experience: Mr. Fields is President and Chief Executive Officer of Ford Motor Company, effective July 2014. Mr. Fields joined Ford in 1989 and served in several executive management positions throughout his tenure, including Chief Operating Officer from December 2012 through June 2014; Executive Vice President and President of the Americas; Executive Vice President of Ford Europe; Executive Vice President of Premier Automotive Group (PAG); Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PAG; and President of Mazda Motor Company.

Reasons for Nomination: As Ford's President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Fields provides the strategic and management leadership necessary to lead Ford's transformation to an auto and mobility company. Mr. Fields's record at Ford speaks for itself. He developed a highly effective and collaborative global leadership team. He continues to deliver product excellence with passion and drive innovation in every part of our business. Mr. Fields is a dynamic leader focused on growing the business, both domestically and globally, moving Ford into the future and delivering profitable growth for all. The Board believes that Mr. Fields's leadership skills will continue to create value for Ford and our stakeholders.

Current Public Company Directorships: International Business Machines Corporation

26

PROPOSAL 1. Election of Directors

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Edsel B. Ford II

GRAPHIC  

Age: 68

Director Since: 1988

Committees: Finance, Sustainability and Innovation

Experience: Mr. Ford serves as a consultant to Ford and has served in this capacity since 1999. Previously, Mr. Ford served as a Vice President of Ford Motor Company and as the former President and Chief Operating Officer of Ford Motor Credit Company.

Reasons for Nomination: Mr. Ford has a wealth of valuable experience. As an executive at the Company and as a consultant for the Company, he developed deep knowledge of the Company's business. Mr. Ford's life-long affiliation with the Company provides the Board with a unique historical perspective and a focus on the long-term interests of the Company. Mr. Ford also adds significant value in various stakeholder relationships, both domestically and abroad, including relationships with dealers, non-government organizations, employees, and the communities in which Ford has a significant presence. In addition, Mr. Ford's experience in creative and technology-driven marketing allows him to provide valuable insight in developing marketing strategies supporting our goal of profitable growth for all.

Public Company Directorships Within the Past Five Years: International Speedway Corporation

William Clay Ford, Jr.

GRAPHIC  

Age: 59

Director Since: 1988

Committees: Finance (Chair), Sustainability and Innovation

Experience: Mr. Ford has held a number of management positions within Ford, including Vice President — Commercial Truck Vehicle Center. Mr. Ford was Chair of the Finance Committee from 1995 until October 2001 and was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors in January 1999. He served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company from October 2001 until September 2006 when he became Executive Chairman. Mr. Ford is also Vice Chairman of the Detroit Lions, Inc., Chairman of the Detroit Economic Club, and trustee of the Henry Ford Museum. He also is a member of the board of Business Leaders for Michigan.

Reasons for Nomination: Mr. Ford has served in a variety of key roles at Ford and understands the Company and its various stakeholders. His long-term perspective and lifelong commitment to the Company adds significant value to the Company's stakeholder relationships. Mr. Ford, an early and influential advocate for sustainability at the Company, has long been recognized as a leader in advancing mobility and connectivity in the automobile industry, which adds significant value to Board deliberations.

Public Company Directorships Within the Past Five Years: eBay Inc.

PROPOSAL 1. Election of Directors

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

27


Table of Contents

William W. Helman IV

GRAPHIC  

Age: 58

Independent Director Since: 2011

Committees: Finance, Nominating and Governance, Sustainability and Innovation (Chair)

Experience: Mr. Helman is a General Partner at Greylock Partners, a venture capital firm focused on early stage investments in technology, consumer Internet, and healthcare. He joined Greylock in 1984 and led the firm's investments in Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Hyperion, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Zipcar, Inc., and UPromise, among others. Mr. Helman is Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Dartmouth College and is on the board of the Broad Institute.

Reasons for Nomination: Mr. Helman's expertise in investing in new innovations offers the Board valuable insight as Ford continues to invest in connectivity and mobility technologies in order to deliver the innovative products our customers want and value. Mr. Helman's experience with investments, social media marketing, and healthcare issues provides a measured perspective as these issues are becoming increasingly important as the auto industry adopts new technologies, develops solutions to personal mobility challenges, adapts to new social media techniques, and the country adjusts to changing new federal healthcare legislation.

Public Company Directorships Within the Past Five Years: Zipcar, Inc.

Jon M. Huntsman, Jr.

GRAPHIC  

Age: 57

Independent Director Since: 2012

Committees: Compensation, Nominating and Governance, Sustainability and Innovation

Experience: Governor Huntsman has been the Chairman of the Atlantic Council of the United States and Chairman of the Huntsman Cancer Foundation since 2012. He has previously served as U.S. Ambassador to China and as Deupty U.S. Trade Representative. Governor Huntsman was twice elected Governor of Utah and served from 2005 to 2009. He began his public service career as a White House staff assistant to President Ronald Reagan and has since served appointments as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Asia, and U.S. Ambassador to Singapore. Governor Huntsman serves on the boards of the U.S. Naval Academy Foundation and the University of Pennsylvania. In addition, he serves as distinguished fellow at the Brookings Institute, a trustee of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and a trustee of the Reagan Presidential Foundation.

Reasons for Nomination: Governor Huntsman's extensive experience in Asia brings a well-informed and international perspective to Board deliberations. Governor Huntsman's expertise is valuable as the Company plans to significantly increase its presence in Asia. In addition, Governor Huntsman's extensive experience in government service provides the Board with important insight on government relations at the state, federal, and international levels.

Current Public Company Directorships: Caterpillar, Inc., Chevron Corporation, and Hilton Worldwide Inc.

Public Company Directorships Within the Past Five Years: Huntsman Corporation

28

PROPOSAL 1. Election of Directors

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

William E. Kennard

GRAPHIC  

Age: 60

Independent Director Since: 2015

Committees: Finance, Nominating and Governance, Sustainability and Innovation

Experience: Mr. Kennard is the Chairman and co-founder of Velocitas Partners LLC and a member of the Operating Executive Board of Staple Street Capital since February 2014. Previously, Mr. Kennard served as chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from 1997 to 2001 and served as the FCC's general counsel from 1993 to 1997. As U.S. Ambassador to the European Union from 2009 to 2013, he worked to eliminate regulatory barriers to commerce and to promote transatlantic trade, investment, and job creation. In addition to his public service, Mr. Kennard was a managing director of The Carlyle Group from 2001 to 2009. He also serves as a trustee of Yale University.

Reasons for Nomination: Mr. Kennard has extensive experience in the law, telecommunications, and private equity fields. In particular, he has shaped policy and pioneered initiatives to help technology benefit consumers worldwide. Mr. Kennard is regarded as a champion for consumers in the digital age, and we believe this expertise and unique perspective will help guide our strategy as we accelerate our innovative work in the areas of in-car connectivity and mobility.

Current Public Company Directorships: AT&T Inc., MetLife, Inc., and Duke Energy Corporation

John C. Lechleiter

GRAPHIC  

Age: 63

Independent Director Since: 2013

Committees: Compensation, Nominating and Governance

Experience: Dr. Lechleiter has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Eli Lilly and Company since January 2009. He previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Lilly from 2008 to 2016. Dr. Lechleiter joined Lilly in 1979 and served in several executive management positions throughout his tenure, including President and Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President for pharmaceutical operations, Executive Vice President for pharmaceutical products and corporate development, and several executive positions in product development and regulatory affairs. Dr. Lechleiter is a member of the American Chemical Society. He also serves as the Chairman of United Way Worldwide and a member emeritus of the board of the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership.

Reasons for Nomination: Dr. Lechleiter's experience as a chief executive officer of a multi-national company and his knowledge of science, marketing, management, and international business aid the Board in its deliberations, especially as Ford seeks to expand its market share in regions outside North America. Dr. Lechleiter's knowledge and experience in research and development in a highly regulated industry also provide the Company with meaningful insight as it accelerates the development of new products. Additionally, Dr. Lechleiter's extensive experience in a highly regulated industry operating in a changing landscape adds significant expertise to the Board and will assist the Board as the Company adapts to an increasingly complex regulatory environment.

Current Public Company Directorships: Eli Lilly and Company and Nike, Inc.

PROPOSAL 1. Election of Directors

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

29


Table of Contents

Ellen R. Marram

GRAPHIC  

Age: 70

Independent Director Since: 1988

Committees: Compensation, Nominating and Governance, Sustainability and Innovation

Experience: Ms. Marram serves as president of the Barnegat Group, LLC, a business advisory firm. She also is a Senior Managing Director at Brock Capital Group LLC. Ms. Marram previously served as the Managing Director of North Castle Partners, LLC from 2000 through 2005, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tropicana Beverage Group from 1997 through 1998, Group President of Tropicana Beverage Group from 1993 through 1997, and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Nabisco Biscuit Company from 1988 through 1993. Ms. Marram currently serves as a board member of New York-Presbyterian Hospital.

Reasons for Nomination: Ms. Marram has extensive management experience and marketing expertise in managing well-known consumer brands. During her 30-year career, she built profitable brands and is recognized for her ability to anticipate market trends and emerging consumer needs. Her expertise complements Ford's desire to meet current customer demand while anticipating the changing demands and needs of our customers. In addition, Ms. Marram's experience in advising companies provides her with multiple perspectives on successful strategies across a variety of businesses. Ms. Marram's qualifications and experience make her an ideal Lead Independent Director for the Company.

Current Public Company Directorships: The New York Times Company and Eli Lilly and Company

John L. Thornton

GRAPHIC  

Age: 63

Independent Director Since: 1996

Committees: Compensation, Finance, Nominating and Governance

Experience: Mr. Thornton has served as Chairman of Barrick Gold Corporation since April 2014. He serves as Chairman of Silk Road Finance Corporation, an Asian investment firm, and as non-executive Chairman of PineBridge Investments, a global asset manager. He is also Co-Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Brookings Institution and advisory board member of China Investment Corporation. He is Professor and Director of Global Leadership at Tsinghua University School of Economics and Management in Beijing, China. Mr. Thornton retired as President and Director of the Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in 2003.

Reasons for Nomination: Mr. Thornton has extensive international business and financial experience. Mr. Thornton brings valuable insight into emerging markets as he expanded the presence of Goldman Sachs Asia, where he served as chairman. Mr. Thornton also served as co-chief executive of Goldman Sachs International, which was responsible for the firm's business in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. Mr. Thornton's extensive experience in corporate finance and business matters, both domestically and internationally, is critical to achieving our goals of financing our plan, improving our balance sheet, and creating profitable growth for all. Mr. Thornton's knowledge brings to the Board valuable insight in international business, especially in China, which has become one of the world's most important automotive growth markets.

Current Public Company Directorships: Barrick Gold Corporation

Public Company Directorships Within the Past Five Years: China Unicom (Hong Kong) Limited; News Corporation; and HSBC Holdings plc

30

PROPOSAL 1. Election of Directors

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Lynn M. Vojvodich

GRAPHIC  

Age: 49

Independent Director Since: April 2017

Committees: Audit, Nominating and Governance, Sustainability and Innovation

Experience: Ms. Vojvodich was Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of Salesforce.com, Inc. from September 2013 until February 2017. In this role, she led Salesforce's branding and positioning, public relations, digital marketing, content marketing, marketing campaigns, and strategic events. Before joining Salesforce, Ms. Vojvodich held marketing leadership roles at Microsoft and BEA Systems, and served as a partner with venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. She is the founder of Take3, a marketing strategy firm.

Reasons for Nomination: Ms. Vojvodich has a wealth of expertise in marketing technology and innovation, market analysis, and the software industry. As Ford continues to transform itself into both an auto and mobility company, Ms. Vojvodich will provide valuable guidance regarding how the Company should market and position itself in both its core business as well as in emerging opportunities.

Current Public Company Directorships: The Priceline Group Inc.

John S. Weinberg

GRAPHIC  

Age: 60

Independent Director Since: 2016

Committees: Finance, Nominating and Governance, Sustainability and Innovation

Experience: Mr. Weinberg became Chairman of the Board of Directors and Executive Chairman of Evercore Partners Inc. in November 2016. Previously, Mr. Weinberg served as Vice Chairman of the Goldman Sachs Group from June 2006 until October 2015. His career at Goldman Sachs spanned more than three decades, with the majority of his time spent in the banking division. Mr. Weinberg currently serves as a board member of New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Middlebury College. He also is an advisory committee member of The Steppingstone Foundation.

Reasons for Nomination: Mr. Weinberg has extensive experience in finance, banking, and capital markets, as well as a deep understanding of Ford, its history, and the needs of its business. During his time with Goldman Sachs, Mr. Weinberg served as a trusted advisor to Ford and other manufacturing clients. As Ford continues to expand its business model, Mr. Weinberg's financial expertise will aid the Company in financing its plan to create profitable growth for all.

Current Public Company Directorships: Evercore Partners Inc.

PROPOSAL 1. Election of Directors

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

31


Table of Contents

Director Compensation in 2016

 

(a)

  (b)       (c)               (d)     (e)    

      Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash 4
      Stock
Awards 5
    Fees 6   Perquisites/
Evaluation
Vehicles 7


 
Tax
Reimbursement

 
Life
Insurance
Premiums 8


 
Dividend
Equivalent
Dollars 9


 
All Other
Compensation

 
  Total    

 

Name

  ($)       ($)     ($)   ($)   ($)   ($)   ($)   ($)     ($)    
             

 

Stephen G. Butler

  125,000       149,998     0   20,898   13,619   254   38,172   72,943     347,941    

 

Kimberly A. Casiano

  100,000       149,998     0   20,781   12,048   254   20,821   53,904     303,902    

 

Anthony F. Earley, Jr.

  125,000       149,998     0   16,179   9,149   254   24,338   49,920     324,918    

 

Edsel B. Ford II

  100,000       149,998     650,000   14,985   11,227   666   0   676,878     926,876    

 

James P. Hackett 1

  16,667       24,989     0   2,884   13,714   42   3,951   20,591     62,247    

 

James H. Hance, Jr.

  100,000       149,998     0   14,347   12,761   254   12,236   39,598     289,596    

 

William W. Helman IV

  115,000       149,998     12,000   800   0   0   0   12,800     277,798    

 

Jon M. Huntsman, Jr.

  100,000       149,998     0   22,368   13,357   254   20,821   56,800     306,798    

 

William E. Kennard

  100,000       149,998     0   24,007   11,422   254   12,044   47,727     297,725    

 

John C. Lechleiter

  100,000       149,998     0   13,335   12,310   254   34,701   60,600     310,598    

 

Ellen R. Marram

  130,000       149,998     0   18,790   8,864   64   20,821   48,539     328,537    

 

Gerald L. Shaheen

  115,000       149,998     0   17,897   12,356   64   36,784   67,101     332,099    

 

John L. Thornton

  100,000       149,998     0   12,882   10,629   254   0   23,765     273,763    

 

Lynn M. Vojvodich 2

  0       0     0   0   0   0   0   0     0    

 

John S. Weinberg 3

  25,000       37,493     0   800   0   16   0   816     63,309    
1
Mr. Hackett resigned from the Board of Directors on March 10, 2016, and amounts paid to him were prorated in connection with his resignation.

2
Ms. Vojvodich was elected to the Board of Directors effective April 1, 2017, and she, therefore, did not receive any compensation during 2016.

3
Mr. Weinberg was elected to the Board of Directors effective October 1, 2016, and amounts paid to him were prorated in connection with his election.

4
Fees.    Effective as of July 1, 2013, the Board of Directors agreed that the following compensation will be paid to non-employee directors of the Company:

Annual Board membership fee

  $ 250,000  

Annual Lead Independent Director fee

  $ 30,000  

Annual Audit Committee chair fee

  $ 25,000  

Annual Compensation Committee chair fee

  $ 25,000  

Annual other Committee chair fee

  $ 15,000  

The annual Board membership fee of $250,000 has been in place since January 1, 2012. In 2013, a review of director compensation at companies similarly situated to Ford indicated that the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee chair fees were below competitive levels. Consequently, the Board increased the fees paid for those positions from $15,000 to $25,000. The Board also approved an increase in the Lead Independent Director fee from $25,000 to $30,000. The increases are consistent with Ford's philosophy of paying its directors near the top level of the leading companies in order to permit the Company to continue to attract quality directors.


As discussed in footnote 5 below, certain directors chose to receive all or a portion of their fees in restricted stock units pursuant to the 2014 Plan. Pursuant to SEC rules, the dollar value of any fees any director elected to receive in restricted units in excess of the 60% of the fees mandatorily paid in restricted stock units pursuant to that plan is shown in the "Fees Earned or Paid in Cash" column.

5
2014 Plan. Effective January 1, 2014, the Board adopted the 2014 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Ford Motor Company. The 2014 Plan was approved by shareholders at the 2014 Annual Meeting. The 2014 Plan is structured so that 60% (the "mandatory portion") of the Annual Board membership fee is mandatorily paid in Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs"). The amounts shown in column (c) are the grant date values of the RSUs relating to the mandatory portion of fees paid under the 2014 Plan. Each Director also had the option of having some or all of his or her remaining fees paid in RSUs pursuant to the 2014 Plan. The RSUs vest immediately upon grant. Each Director had the option to choose when the RSUs settle into shares of Ford common stock as follows: (i) immediately on the grant date; (ii) the earlier of five years from the date of grant and separation from the Board; or (iii) at separation from the Board. The Board adopted the 2014 Plan because the RSUs settle in shares of common stock, thus further aligning the interests of directors and shareholders. Directors are not permitted to sell, hedge, or pledge the 60% mandatory portion of the Annual Board fees until after separation from the Board, even if the RSUs settle into shares of common stock prior to separation from the Board. In light of the requirement that 60% of annual director fees are paid in RSUs, and that directors may not dispose of such RSUs or shares of stock until after separation from the Board, there is no minimum share ownership requirement for members of the Board. If dividends are paid on common stock, Dividend Equivalents are paid in additional RSUs on RSU balances for those directors whose RSUs have not settled into shares of common stock. For any director whose

32

PROPOSAL 1. Election of Directors

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

    RSUs have settled into shares of common stock, they are required to reinvest those dividends into additional shares of common stock until separation from the Board.

6
The amount shown for Edsel B. Ford II reflects the fees he earned pursuant to a January 1999 consulting agreement between the Company and Mr. Ford. The consulting fee is payable quarterly in arrears in cash. Mr. Ford is available for consultation, representation, and other duties under the agreement. Additionally, the Company provides facilities (including office space) and an administrative assistant to Mr. Ford. This agreement will continue until either party ends it with 30 days' notice. The amount shown for Mr. Helman reflects fees paid to him as a member of the Board of Managers of Ford Global Technologies, LLC, a wholly-owned entity that manages the Company's intellectual property. As a non-employee manager of such board, Mr. Helman received the customary fees paid to non-employee managers. Currently, the fees are: Annual Fee: $10,000, Attendance Fee: $1,000 per meeting. Mr. Helman attended both meetings of the Board of Managers of Ford Global Technologies, LLC, during 2016.

7
Perquisites and Evaluation Vehicle Program. All amounts shown in this column reflect the cost of: (i) evaluation vehicles provided to Directors; (ii) the actual cost incurred for holiday gifts; and (iii) healthcare insurance premiums for certain directors. We calculate the aggregate incremental costs of providing the evaluation vehicles by estimating the lease fee of a comparable vehicle under our Management Lease Program. The lease fee under that program takes into account the cost of using the vehicle, maintenance, license, title and registration fees, and insurance. We provide non-employee directors with the use of up to two Company vehicles free of charge. Directors are expected to provide evaluations of the vehicles to the Company. The cost of providing these vehicles is included in column (d).

8
Insurance. Ford provides non-employee directors with $200,000 of life insurance which ends when a director retires. A director can choose to reduce life insurance coverage to $50,000 and avoid any income imputation. Effective January 1, 2014, the non-employee director life insurance program was changed to allow former employees who become directors to participate in the program and keep the life insurance coverage provided to retired employees. The life insurance premiums paid by the Company for each director are included in column (d). Ford also provides non-employee directors with the option to obtain Company provided healthcare insurance at no cost. The healthcare insurance is identical to healthcare insurance provided to employees, except for the employee paid portion of premiums. Seven directors have elected this option and that portion of the premiums that the Company pays on behalf of directors that employees typically pay is included in column (d).

9
Dividend Equivalents. The amounts shown in this column reflect the amount of Dividend Equivalents paid during 2016 under the 2014 Plan. If dividends are paid on common stock, Dividend Equivalents are paid in additional RSUs on RSU balances for those directors whose RSUs have not settled into shares of common stock.

Your Board's recommendation: FOR Proposal 1

PROPOSAL 1. Election of Directors

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

33


Table of Contents


Proposal 2. Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors selects and hires the independent registered public accounting firm. You must approve the Audit Committee's selection for 2017.

The Audit Committee selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PricewaterhouseCoopers") to perform an independent audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for 2017. PricewaterhouseCoopers is well qualified to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers will be present at the meeting with the opportunity to make a statement and answer questions.

Amounts paid by the Company to PricewaterhouseCoopers for audit and non-audit services rendered in 2016 and 2015 are disclosed in the table below.

Ford management will present the following resolution to the meeting:

"RESOLVED, That the selection, by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to perform an independent audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for 2017 is ratified."

Your Board's recommendation: FOR Proposal 2

Fees Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers
  Year-ended
December 31, 2016
($)
  Year-ended
December 31, 2015
($)
 

Audit Fees 1

    37,400,000     38,400,000  

Audit-Related Fees 2

    3,700,000     3,100,000  

Tax Fees 3

    3,600,000     3,500,000  

All Other Fees 4

    1,300,000     4,900,000  

TOTAL FEES

    46,000,000     49,900,000  
1
Consists of the audit of the financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, reviews of the financial statement included in the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, attestation of the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting, preparation of statutory audit reports, and providing comfort letters in connection with Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Credit Company funding transactions.

2
Consists of support of funding transactions, due diligence for mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, employee benefit plan audits, attestation services, internal control reviews, and assistance with interpretation of accounting standards.

3
Consists of assistance with tax compliance and the preparation of tax returns, tax consultation, planning, and implementation services, assistance in connection with tax audits, and tax advice related to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures. Of the fees paid for tax services, we paid 53% and 77% for tax compliance and preparation of tax returns in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

4
Consists of support in business and regulatory reviews, research analysis regarding new strategies, and advisory services related to insurance claims.

Audit Committee Report

GRAPHIC

The Audit Committee is composed of four directors, all of whom meet the independence standards contained in the NYSE Listed Company rules, SEC rules, and Ford's Corporate Governance Principles, and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter may be found on the Company's website, www.corporate.ford.com. The Audit Committee selects, subject to shareholder ratification, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm.

Ford management is responsible for the Company's internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers, is responsible for performing independent audits of the Company's consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting and issuing an opinion on the conformity of

34

PROPOSAL 2

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

those audited financial statements with United States generally accepted accounting principles and on the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee monitors the Company's financial reporting process and reports to the Board of Directors on its findings. PricewaterhouseCoopers served as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm in 2016 and 2015.

AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE

During the last year, the Audit Committee met and held discussions with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with Ford management and PricewaterhouseCoopers the audited financial statements and the assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Audit Committee also discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers the matters required to be discussed by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm's communications with the Audit Committee, as well as by SEC regulations. In conjunction with the mandated rotation of PricewaterhouseCoopers's lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its chairperson are also directly involved in the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers's new lead engagement partner.

PricewaterhouseCoopers submitted to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm's communications with the audit committee concerning independence. The Audit Committee discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers such firm's independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the SEC.

The Audit Committee also considered whether the provision of other non-audit services by PricewaterhouseCoopers to the Company is compatible with maintaining the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers and concluded that the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers is not compromised by the provision of such services.

Annually, the Audit Committee pre-approves categories of services to be performed (rather than individual engagements) by PricewaterhouseCoopers. As part of this approval, an amount is established for each category of services (Audit, Audit-Related, Tax Services, and other services). In the event the pre-approved amounts prove to be insufficient, a request for incremental funding will be submitted to the Audit Committee for approval during the next regularly scheduled meeting. In addition, all new engagements greater than $250,000 will be presented in advance to the Audit Committee for approval. A regular report is prepared for each regular Audit Committee meeting outlining actual fees and expenses paid or committed against approved fees.

Audit Committee
Stephen G. Butler (Chair)
Kimberly A. Casiano
  James H. Hance, Jr.
Gerald L. Shaheen

PROPOSAL 2

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

35

Table of Contents

Proposal 3. Approval of the Compensation of the Named Executives

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in July 2010, requires that we provide you with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executives, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. At the 2011 Annual Meeting you approved our proposal to provide you with this opportunity on an annual basis, and this year we again ask you to provide an advisory vote as to the frequency of the Say-on-Pay vote (see Proposal 4 on p. 73).

As described in detail in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," we seek to closely align the interests of our Named Executives with yours. Our compensation programs are designed to reward our Named Executives for the achievement of short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals, while at the same time avoiding unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. We urge you to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis on pp. 38-59 and the other related executive compensation disclosures so that you have an understanding of our executive compensation philosophy, policies, and practices.

The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather the vote relates to the compensation of our Named Executives, as described in this Proxy Statement. The vote is advisory, which means that the vote is not binding on the Company, our Board of Directors, or the Compensation Committee.

Ford management will present the following resolution to the meeting:

"RESOLVED, That the Company's shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executives, as disclosed in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, and the other related tables and disclosure."

Your Board's recommendation: FOR Proposal 3

36

PROPOSAL 3

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

CD&A Roadmap

GRAPHIC

*
See pages 25, 82, and 83 of Ford's 2016 Form 10-K for definitions and reconciliations to GAAP.

CD&A ROADMAP

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

37


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CD&A)

Executive Summary

Our Company focus remains unchanged: accelerate our One Ford Plan; deliver product excellence with passion; and drive innovation in every part of our business. In 2016, our leadership team developed our vision and strategy that captures these Ford values and our objectives for the future — Where to Play, Where not to Play, and How to Win.

We analyze our business based on Where to Play — that is, where we can fortify our strengths, how we can transform our businesses that have underperformed, and where we see a path to profitable growth in emerging opportunities. We also analyze Where not to Play — that is, exiting those businesses or markets where we do not see a path to sustained profitability, as shown by our decision to exit the Indonesian and Japanese markets. In addition, we analyze How to Win — that is, how do we utilize our resources, such as our core profitability, to make wise investments for future growth and profitability. The graphic below captures our vision, objectives, and strategic priorities.

GRAPHIC

Our objective is to deliver top quartile returns by expanding our scope from vehicles to mobility through business model innovation. We are doing this by focusing on strategic priorities that will drive value: Fortify our profit pillars such as trucks, utilities, commercial vehicles, performance vehicles, Ford Credit, and Ford Customer Service Division; Transform our luxury, small vehicle, and emerging markets businesses; and Grow our electrification, autonomy, and mobility businesses. All of which is governed by Where to Play, Where not to Play, and How to Win.

38

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

2016 — ANOTHER STRONG YEAR

GRAPHIC   TOTAL COMPANY NET INCOME | $4.6 billion   GRAPHIC   AUTOMOTIVE SEGMENT OPERATING MARGIN | 6.7%
Second highest since at least the 1990s
GRAPHIC   TOTAL COMPANY ADJUSTED PRE-TAX PROFIT* | $10.4 billion   GRAPHIC   AUTOMOTIVE SEGMENT OPERATING CASH FLOW | $6.4 billion
Second best level since at least 2001
GRAPHIC   TOTAL COMPANY REVENUE | $151.8 billion
Automotive segment revenue highest since 2007
  GRAPHIC   VOLUME | 6.651 million
Highest wholesale volume since 2005

 

*   See pages 25, 82, and 83 of Ford's 2016 Form 10-K for definitions and reconciliations to GAAP.        

STRONG FOUNDATION IN PLACE TO GROW BUSINESS

The information in this Performance Section shows we have a strong core business that continues to deliver impressive results over a sustained time period. In order to create greater value for our stakeholders, it is important we use that strong foundation to take advantage of emerging growth opportunities. The graphics below show some of our achievements and plans in our core business and emerging opportunities.

CORE BUSINESS   EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES
GRAPHIC   Launched 11 global products in 2016, including first all-new F-Series Super Duty in 18 years, the flagship Lincoln Continental, and Focus RS   GRAPHIC   In 2016, we expanded our autonomous test fleet from 10 to 30 vehicles. In 2017, we plan to further expand the fleet and begin testing in Europe
GRAPHIC   In 2016, Ford was America's best-selling vehicle brand for the seventh consecutive year   GRAPHIC   Acquired Chariot, a crowd-sourced shuttle company that has operations in two U.S. cities and plans to expand to eight cities by the end of the year, including one outside the U.S.
GRAPHIC   Lincoln global sales up 24% year-over-year, up 10% in the U.S., and nearly triple in China   GRAPHIC   Plan to bring to market 13 new electrified products within the next five years, including versions of the F-150 and Mustang
GRAPHIC   On track to deliver 12 new performance vehicles by the end of the decade, including the all-new Raptor and Ford GT   GRAPHIC   Ford awarded the most U.S. patents of any automotive manufacturer in 2016
GRAPHIC   Improved market share in Asia Pacific driven by China   GRAPHIC   Announced investment in an artificial intelligence company to augment our intention to bring to market Level 4 autonomous vehicles in 2021

We will pursue these and other opportunities as we strive to deliver top quartile shareholder returns through focused automotive and high-growth mobility initiatives.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

39


Table of Contents

We believe in the effectiveness of our strategy and the compensation programs we have designed to support it. The table below shows our performance in key metrics over the past three years:

PERFORMANCE IN KEY METRICS

 
   
  2014
  2015
  2016
   

 

Total Company Net Income

  $1.2 Bils.   $7.4 Bils.   $4.6 Bils.    

 

Total Company Adjusted Pre-Tax Profit*

  $7.3 Bils.   $10.8 Bils.   $10.4 Bils.    

 

Automotive Segment Operating Cash Flow

  $3.6 Bils.   $7.3 Bils.   $6.4 Bils.    

 

Automotive Segment Operating Margin

  4.6%   6.8%   6.7%    

 

Automotive Segment Revenue

  $135.8 Bils.   $140.6 Bils.   $141.5 Bils.    

 


 

   CHART

 

CHART

 

CHART
      *
      See pages 25, 82, and 83 of Ford's 2016 Form 10-K for definitions and reconciliations to GAAP.

      **
      Includes $0.25 supplemental dividend

Although our 2016 Automotive Segment Revenue was slightly higher than last year and our total Company adjusted EPS was down, we achieved solid total Company net income and our second-best total Company adjusted pre-tax profit, Automotive Segment Operating Margin, and Automotive Segment Operating Cash Flow. Our performance was slightly below last year primarily due to a plateauing of the auto market in the U.S., a difficult environment in South America, as well as to a lesser extent, investments in emerging opportunities. As shown in the 2016 Incentive Bonus Plan Performance Results table on p. 52, our performance resulted in a lower Incentive Bonus payout for 2016 performance.

40

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

FORD TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN ("TSR") PERFORMANCE

GRAPHIC

*
The "TSR Peer Group" referenced above is the peer group we used in our 2016 Performance Unit grants. The TSR Peer Group of companies is more closely aligned with our business (global automotive and manufacturing) than the compensation survey group listed on p. 45 because our TSR performance is more competitively aligned with those companies, while our compensation peer group is more closely aligned with the market for our executive talent. See Performance Unit Grants discussion on pp. 54-55 for a description of the TSR Peer Group.

The chart above indicates that our TSR performance has lagged that of our peer group and the S&P 500 over the one-, three-, and five-year periods. It is important to note that in 2015 our Performance Unit grants were modified to include relative TSR as a factor. Thus, the first payout of the revised program in 2018 will reflect actual relative TSR performance. As the table on p. 40 shows, our operating results remained strong in 2016. Shareholders have benefited from our results also. In January 2015, we increased our dividend to a quarterly rate of $0.15 per share, and in January 2016, we maintained the quarterly rate and paid our first annual supplemental dividend of $0.25 per share. In the first quarter of 2017, we maintained our regular quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share and paid a supplemental dividend of $0.05 per share.

We also provided guidance for 2017, which includes strong total company pre-tax adjusted profit, Automotive Segment Operating Cash Flow, Automotive Segment Revenue, and Automotive Segment Operating Margin but lower than 2016. Our core automotive business is expected to remain strong, however, investments in emerging opportunities will lower overall profitability. As outlined on p. 39, we are investing in emerging opportunities, such as electrification, mobility, and autonomous vehicles, that will strengthen our business for the long-term. While these investments in our future may adversely affect current results, it is critical that we move towards an auto and mobility future. We continue to believe that our consistent strong performance in our core business combined with investment in emerging opportunities will be rewarded by the equity markets.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

GRAPHIC

2017 Proxy Statement

41