EX-99.77E LEGAL

April-06

Exhibit 77E

Legal Proceedings
As has been previously reported, the staff of the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Office of New York Attorney
General (NYAG) have been investigating practices in the mutual
fund industry identified as market timing and late trading of
mutual fund shares. Certain other regulatory authorities have
also been conducting investigations into these practices within
the industry and have requested that the Adviser provide
information to them. The Adviser has been cooperating and will
continue to cooperate with all of these authorities.

On December 18, 2003, the Adviser confirmed that it had reached
terms with the SEC and the NYAG for the resolution of regulatory
claims relating to the practice of market timing mutual fund
shares in some of the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds. The
agreement with the SEC is reflected in an Order of the Commission
(SEC Order). The agreement with the NYAG is memorialized
in an Assurance of Discontinuance dated September 1, 2004
(NYAG Order). Among the key provisions of these agreements are
the following:

(i) The Adviser agreed to establish a $250 million fund (the
Reimbursement Fund) to compensate mutual fund shareholders for
the adverse effects of market timing attributable to market
timing relationships described in the SEC Order. According to
the SEC Order, the Reimbursement Fund is to be paid, in order
of priority, to fund investors based on (i) their aliquot share
of losses suffered by the fund due to market timing, and (ii)
a proportionate share of advisory fees paid by such fund during
the period of such market timing;

(ii) The Adviser agreed to reduce the advisory fees it receives
from some of the AllianceBernstein long-term, open-end retail
funds until December 31, 2008; and

(iii) The Adviser agreed to implement changes to its governance
and compliance procedures. Additionally, the SEC Order and the
NYAG Order contemplate that the Advisers registered investment
company clients, including the Fund, will introduce governance
and compliance changes.

In anticipation of final, definitive documentation of the NYAG
Order and effective January 1, 2004, the Adviser began waiving
a portion of its advisory fee. On September 7, 2004, the Funds
investment advisory agreement was amended to reflect the reduced
advisory fee at the annual rate of .45% of the first $2.5 billion,
..40% of the next $2.5 billion and .35% in excess of $5 billion,
of the Funds average daily net assets.

A special committee of the Advisers Board of Directors, comprised
of the members of the Advisers Audit Committee and the other
independent member of the Advisers Board, directed and oversaw
an internal investigation and a comprehensive review of the
facts and circumstances relevant to the SECs and the NYAGs
investigations.

In addition, the Independent Directors of the Fund (the
Independent Directors) have initiated an investigation of
the above-mentioned matters with the advice of an independent
economic consultant and independent counsel. The Independent
Directors have formed a special committee to supervise the
investigation.

On October 2, 2003, a purported class action complaint entitled
Hindo, et al. v. AllianceBernstein Growth & Income Fund, et al.
(Hindo Complaint) was filed against the Adviser, Alliance Capital
Management Holding L.P. (Alliance Holding), Alliance Capital
Management Corporation, AXA Financial, Inc., the AllianceBernstein
Funds, certain officers of the Adviser (Alliance defendants),
and certain other defendants not affiliated with the Adviser,
as well as unnamed Doe defendants. The Hindo Complaint was filed
in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York by alleged shareholders of two of the AllianceBernstein
Funds. The Hindo Complaint alleges that certain of the Alliance
defendants failed to disclose that they improperly allowed certain
hedge funds and other unidentified parties to engage in late
trading and market timing of AllianceBernstein Fund securities,
violating Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act, Sections
10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Sections 206
and 215 of the Advisers Act. Plaintiffs seek an unspecified
amount of compensatory damages and rescission of their contracts
with the Adviser, including recovery of all fees paid to the
Adviser pursuant to such contracts.

Since October 2, 2003, 43 additional lawsuits making factual
allegations generally similar to those in the Hindo Complaint
were filed in various federal and state courts against the Adviser
and certain other defendants. The plaintiffs in such lawsuits
have asserted a variety of theories for recovery including,
but not limited to, violations of the Securities Act, the
Exchange Act, the Advisers Act, the Investment Company Act,
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
(ERISA), certain state securities laws and common law.  All
state court actions against the Adviser either were voluntarily
dismissed or removed to federal court. On February 20, 2004,
the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred all
actions to the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland (the Mutual Fund MDL).

On September 29, 2004, plaintiffs filed consolidated amended
complaints with respect to four claim types: mutual fund
shareholder claims; mutual fund derivative claims; derivative
claims brought on behalf of Alliance Holding; and claims brought
under ERISA by participants in the Profit Sharing Plan for
Employees of the Adviser. All four complaints include
substantially identical factual allegations, which appear to be
based in large part on the SEC Order and the NYAG Order. The
claims in the mutual fund derivative consolidated amended
complaint are generally based on the theory that all fund
advisory agreements, distribution agreements and 12b-1 plans
between the Adviser and the AllianceBernstein Funds should be
invalidated, regardless of whether market timing occurred in
each individual fund, because each was approved by fund
trustees on the basis of materially misleading information with
respect to the level of market timing permitted in funds managed
by the Adviser. The claims asserted in the other three
consolidated amended complaints are similar to those that the
respective plaintiffs asserted in their previous federal lawsuits.
All of these lawsuits seek an unspecified amount of damages.

On April 21, 2006, the Adviser and attorneys for the plaintiffs
in the mutual fund shareholder claims, mutual fund derivative
claims, and ERISA claims entered into a confidential memorandum of
understanding (MOU) containing their agreement to settle these
claims. The agreement will be documented by a stipulation
of settlement and will be submitted for court approval at a
later date.

On February 10, 2004, the Adviser received (i) a subpoena duces
tecum from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of
West Virginia and (ii) a request for information from West
Virginias Office of the State Auditor, Securities Commission
(the West Virginia Securities Commissioner) (together, the
Information Requests). Both Information Requests require the
Adviser to produce documents concerning, among other things,
any market timing or late trading in the Advisers sponsored
mutual funds. The Adviser responded to the Information Requests
and has been cooperating fully with the investigation.

On April 11, 2005, a complaint entitled The Attorney General of
the State of West Virginia v. AIM Advisors, Inc., et al. (WVAG
Complaint) was filed against the Adviser, Alliance Holding, and
various other defendants not affiliated with the Adviser. The
WVAG Complaint was filed in the Circuit Court of Marshall
County, West Virginia by the Attorney General of the State of
West Virginia. The WVAG Complaint makes factual allegations
generally similar to those in the Hindo Complaint. On October
19, 2005, the WVAG Complaint was transferred to the Mutual
Fund MDL.

On August 30, 2005, the deputy commissioner of securities of the
West Virginia Securities Commissioner signed a Summary Order to
Cease and Desist, and Notice of Right to Hearing addressed to
the Adviser and Alliance Holding. The Summary Order claims that
the Adviser and Alliance Holding violated the West Virginia
Uniform Securities Act, and makes factual allegations generally
similar to those in the Commission Order and the NYAG Order. On
January 26, 2006, the Adviser, Alliance Holding, and various
unaffiliated defendants filed a Petition for Writ of
Prohibition and Order Suspending Proceedings in West Virginia
state court seeking to vacate the Summary Order and for other
relief. On April 12, 2006, respondents petition was denied. On
May 4, 2006, respondents appealed the courts determination.

On June 22, 2004, a purported class action complaint entitled
Aucoin, et al. v. Alliance Capital Management L.P., et al.
(Aucoin Complaint) was filed against the Adviser, Alliance
Holding , Alliance Capital Management Corporation, AXA Financial,
Inc., AllianceBernstein Investment Research & Management, Inc.,
certain current and former directors of the AllianceBernstein
Mutual Funds, and unnamed Doe defendants. The Aucoin Complaint
names certain of the AllianceBernstein mutual funds as nominal
defendants. The Aucoin Complaint was filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York by alleged
shareholders of an AllianceBernstein mutual fund. The Aucoin
Complaint alleges, among other things, (i) that certain of the
defendants improperly authorized the payment of excessive
commissions and other fees from fund assets to broker-dealers in
exchange for preferential marketing services, (ii) that certain
of the defendants misrepresented and omitted from registration
statements and other reports material facts concerning such
payments, and (iii) that certain defendants caused such conduct
as control persons of other defendants. The Aucoin Complaint
asserts claims for violation of Sections 34(b), 36(b) and 48(a)
of the Investment Company Act, Sections 206 and 215 of the
Advisers Act, breach of common law fiduciary duties, and aiding
and abetting breaches of common law fiduciary duties. Plaintiffs
seek an unspecified amount of compensatory damages and puni-
tive damages, rescission of their contracts with the Adviser,
including recovery of all fees paid to the Adviser pursuant to
such contracts, an accounting of all fundrelated fees,
commissions and soft dollar payments, and restitution of all
unlawfully or discriminatorily obtained fees and expenses.

Since June 22, 2004, nine additional lawsuits making factual
allegations substantially similar to those in the Aucoin
Complaint were filed against the Adviser and certain other
defendants. All nine of the lawsuits (i) were brought as class
actions filed in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York, (ii) assert claims substantially
identical to the Aucoin Complaint, and (iii) are brought on
behalf of shareholders of the Funds. On February 2, 2005,
plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint
(Aucoin Consolidated Amended Complaint) that asserts claims
substantially similar to the Aucoin Complaint and the nine
additional lawsuits referenced above. On October 19, 2005,
the District Court dismissed each of the claims set forth in
the Aucoin Consolidated Amended Complaint, except for plaintiffs
claim under Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act. On
January 11, 2006, the District Court granted defendants motion
for reconsideration and dismissed the remaining Section 36(b)
claim. On May 31, 2006 the District Court denied plaintiffs
motion for leave to file an amended complaint.

It is possible that these matters and/or other developments
resulting from these matters could result in increased
redemptions of the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds shares or other
adverse consequences to the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds. This
may require the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds to sell investments
held by those funds to provide for sufficient liquidity and could
also have an adverse effect on the investment performance of the
AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds. However, the Adviser believes
that these matters are not likely to have a material adverse
effect on its ability to perform advisory services relating to
the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds.

EX-99.77D POLICIES

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN BOND FUND, INC.
INTERMEDIATE BOND PORTFOLIO


FORMER POLICIES			     	CURRENT POLICIES

Investment Objective:

Fundamental:				Non-Fundamental:
The Portfolios investment objective	The Funds investment objective
is high current income consistent 	is to generate income and
with preservation of capital by 	price appreciation without
investing in investment grade		assuming what Alliance
fixed-income securities.		considers undue risk.

Fundamental Investment Policies:

The Portfolio may not issue any		The Portfolio may not issue any
senior securities as defined in the	senior security (as that term is
1940 Act (except to the extent that	defined in the 1940 Act) or borrow
when-issued securities transactions,	money, except to the extent
forward commitments or stand-by		permitted by the 1940 Act or the
commitments may be considered senior	rules and regulations thereunder
securities).  				(as such statute, rules or
					regulations may be amended from
					time to time) or by guidance
					regarding, or interpretations of,
					or exemptive orders under, the 1940
					Act or the rules or regulations
					thereunder published by appropriate
					regulatory authorities.
					For the purposes of this
					restriction, margin and collateral
					arrangements, including, for
					example, with respect to permitted
					borrowings, options, futures
					contracts, options on futures
					contracts and other derivatives
					such as swaps are not deemed to
					involve the issuance of a senior
					security.

The Portfolio may not			Fundamental policy eliminated.
effect a short sale of any
security except when it has, by		Related non-fundamental policy:
reason of ownership of other		The Portfolio may not effect
securities, the right to obtain		a short sale of any security
securities of equivalent kind		except when it has, by reason
and amount that will be held so		of ownership of other securities,
long as it is in a short position.	the right to obtain securities of
					equivalent kind and amount that
					will be held so long as it is in
					a short position.

The Portfolio may not underwrite	The Portfolio may not act as an
securities issued by other persons	underwriter of securities, except
except to the extent that, in		that the Portfolio may acquire
connection with the disposition of	restricted securities under
its portfolio investments, it may	circumstances in which, if such
be deemed to be an underwriter under	securities were sold, the
certain federal securities laws.	Portfolio might be deemed to be
					an underwriter for purposes of the
					Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The Portfolio may not purchase real	The Portfolio may not purchase or
estate or mortgages; however, the	sell real estate except that it
Portfolio may, as appropriate and	may dispose of real estate acquired
consistent with its investment		as a result of the ownership of
policies and other investment		securities or other instruments.
restrictions, buy securities of		This restriction does not prohibit
issuers which engage in real estate	the Portfolio from investing in
operations and securities which are	securities or other instruments
secured by interests in real estate	backed by real estate or in
(including partnership interests	securities of companies engaged
and shares of real estate investment	in the real estate business.
trusts), and may hold and sell real
estate acquired as a result of
ownership of such securities.

The Portfolio may not purchase or	The Portfolio may not purchase or
sell commodities or commodity		sell commodities regulated by the
contracts, except that the Portfolio	Commodity Futures Trading
may purchase and sell futures		Commission under the Commodity
contracts and options on futures	Exchange Act or commodities
contracts (including foreign currency	contracts except for futures
futures contracts and options thereon,	contracts and options on futures
forward currency exchange contracts	contracts.
and interest rate futures contracts
and options), forward commitments and
similar contracts

The Portfolio may notborrow money,	Policy eliminated.
except that this restriction shall
not apply to borrowing from banks
for temporary purposes, to the
pledging of assets to banks in order
to transfer funds for various
purposes as required without
interfering with the orderly
liquidation of securities in the
Portfolio (but not for leveraging
purposes), to margin payments or
pledges in connection with options,
futures contracts, options on futures
contracts, forward currency exchange
contracts or options on foreign
currencies, or, transactions in
interest rate swaps, caps and floors

The Portfolio may not purchase any	Fundamental policy eliminated.
security on margin.

					Related non-fundamental policy:
					The Portfolio may not purchase
					securities on margin, except (i)
					as otherwise provided under rules
					adopted by the SEC under the 1940
					Act or by guidance regarding the
					1940 Act, or interpretations
					thereof, and (ii) that the
					Portfolio may obtain such short-
					term credits as are necessary for
					the clearance of portfolio
					transactions, and the Portfolio
					may make margin payments in
					connection with futures contracts,
					options, forward contracts, swaps,
					caps, floors, collars and other
					financial instruments.

The Portfolio may not make loans	The Portfolio may not make loans
(including lending cash or		except through (i) the purchase of
securities), except that the		debt obligations in accordance with
Portfolio may make loans of		its investment objectives and
portfolio securities not exceeding	policies; (ii) the lending of
50% of the value of the Portfolio's	portfolio securities; (iii) the use
total assets.  This restriction does	of repurchase agreements; or (iv)
not prevent the Portfolio from		the making of loans to affiliated
purchasing debt obligations in which	funds as permitted under the
the Portfolio may invest consistent	1940 Act, the rules and regulations
with its investment policies, or	thereunder (as such statutes, rule
from buying government obligations,	or regulations may be amended from
short-term commercial paper, or		time to time), or by guidance
publicly-traded debt, including		regarding, and interpretations of,
bonds, notes, debentures,		or exemptive orders under, the
certificates of deposit and equipment	1940 Act.
trust certificates, nor does this
restriction apply to loans made under
insurance policies or through entry
into repurchase agreements to the
extent they may be viewed as loans.

The Portfolio will not make an		The Portfolio may not concentrate
investment in an industry if that	investments in an industry, as
investment would make the		concentration may be defined under
Portfolio's holdings in that		the 1940 Act or the rules and
industry exceed 25% of the		regulations thereunder (as such
Portfolio's assets.  The U.S.		statute, rules or regulations may
Government, its agencies and		be amended from time to time) or
instrumentalities are not considered	by guidance regarding,
members of any industry.		interpretations of, or exemptive
					orders under, the 1940 Act or the
					rules or regulations thereunder
					published by appropriate regulatory
					authorities.

The Portfolio intends to be		The Portfolio is diversified.
diversified, as that term is defined
under the 1940 Act.  In general, this
means that the Portfolio will not
make an investment unless, when
considering all its other investments,
75% of the value of the Portfolio's
assets would consist of cash, cash
items, U.S. Government securities,
securities of other investment
companies and other securities.
For the purposes of this restriction,
other securities are limited for any
one issuer to not more than 5% of
the value of the Portfolio's total
assets and to not more than 10% of
the issuer's outstanding voting
securities.  As a matter of
operating policy, the Portfolio will
not consider repurchase agreements
to be subject to the above-stated 5%
limitation if the collateral
underlying the repurchase agreements
consists exclusively of U.S.
Government securities and such
repurchase agreements are fully
collateralized.



Non-fundamental Investment Policies:

The Portfolio normally invests all of	The Portfolio normally invests up
its assets in securities that are	to 80% of its assets in investment
rated at least BBB- by Standard &	grade debt securities.
Poors Ratings Service or Baaa3 by
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. or,
if unrated, are of comparable quality.

					The Portfolio may invest up to 20%
					of its assets in debt securities
					rated BBB- or below by S&P and
					Baaa3 or below by Moodys.

The Portfolio may invest up to 20%	The Portfolio may invest without
of its total assets in foreign		limit in U.S. Dollar-denominated
fixed-income securities.		foreign fixed-income securities and
					may also invest in non-U.S. Dollar
					denominated foreign fixed-income
					securities.

The Portfolio may not invest more	The Portfolio will limit its
than 15% of its net assets in		investment in illiquid securities
securities restricted as to		to no more than 15% of net assets
disposition under Federal securities	or such other amount permitted by
laws, or securities otherwise		guidance regarding the 1940 Act.
considered illiquid or not readily
marketable, including repurchase
agreements not terminable within
seven days; however, this restriction
will not apply to securities sold
pursuant to Rule 144A under the
Securities Act, so long as such
securities meet liquidity guidelines
established from time to time by the
Board of Directors.

The Portfolio may not acquire		Policy eliminated.
securities of any company that is
a securities broker or dealer, a
securities underwriter, an investment
adviser of an investment company, or
an investment adviser registered
under the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940 (other than any such company
that derives no more than 15% of its
gross revenues from securities
related activities), except that the
Portfolio may purchase bank, trust
company, and bank holding company
stock, and except that the Portfolio
may invest in accordance with
Rule 12d3-1 under the 1940 Act,
including up to 5% of its total
assets in any such company provided
that it owns no more than 5% of the
outstanding equity securities of any
class plus 10% of the outstanding
debt securities of such company or
as otherwise provided by Rule 12d3-1.

The Portfolio may not make an		Policy eliminated.
investment in order to exercise
control or management over a company.

The Portfolio may enter into standby	The Portfolio may enter into standby
commitment agreements if the		commitment agreements.
aggregate purchase price of the
securities subject to the commitments
does not exceed 20% of its assets
and the term of the commitment does
not exceed 45 days.

The Portfolio may invest in other	The Portfolio may invest in
investment companies whose		securities of other investment
investment objectives and policies	companies, including exchange-
are consistent with those of the	traded funds, to the extent
Portfolio.				permitted under the 1940 Act
					or the rules and regulations
					thereunder (as such statute,
					rules or regulations may be
					amended from time to time) or by
					guidance regarding, interpretations
					of, or exemptive orders under, the
					1940 Act or the rules or regulations
					thereunder published by appropriate
					regulatory authorities.

The Portfolios lending of securities,	The Portfolio may lend portfolio
including collateral, is limited to	securities to the extent permitted
50% of total assets.			under the 1940 Act or the rules and
					regulations thereunder (as such
					statute, rules or regulations may
					be amended from time to time) or by
					guidance regarding, interpretations
					of, or exemptive orders under, the
					1940 Act.

					The Portfolio may invest in loan
					participations.

					The Portfolio may invest in
					derivatives, including options,
					futures, forwards and swaps.


SK 00250 0450 682177

EX-99.77C VOTES

AllianceBernstein Bond Fund, Inc.
Intermediate Bond Portfolio

811-20383

77C  Matters submitted to a vote of security holders

RESULTS OF SHAREHOLDERS MEETING
(unaudited)

A Special Meeting of the AllianceBernstein Intermediate Bond Fund (the
 Fund) was held on November 15, 2005 and adjourned until December 6,
 2005, and December 19, 2005. At the November 15, 2005 Meeting, with
respect to the first item of business, the election of Directors, the
required number of outstanding shares were voted in favor of the
proposal, and the proposal was approved. At the December 19, 2005
Meeting, with respect to the third item of business, the amendment,
elimination, or reclassification as non-fundamental of the fundamental
 investment restrictions, and the fourth item of business, the
reclassification of the Fund's fundamental investment objective as
non-fundamental with changes to the Fund's investment objectives, the
required number of outstanding shares voted in favor of each proposal,
 and each proposal was approved. At the December 19, 2005 Meeting,
with respect to the second item of business, the approval of the
amendment and restatement of the Charter, the required number of
outstanding shares were voted in favor of the proposal, and the
proposal was approved. A description of each proposal and number of
shares voted at the Meetings are as follows (the proposal numbers
shown below correspond to the proposal numbers in the Fund's proxy
statement):

Voted For Withheld Authority

1.The election of
the Trustees, each
such Trustee to
serve a term of an
indefinite duration
and until his or
her successor is
duly elected and
qualifies.






Ruth Block		110,504,373	7,480,789
David H. Dievler	110,556,798	7,428,365
John H. Dobkin		110,592,166	7,392,996
Michael J. Downey	110,616,030	7,369,133
William H. Foulk, Jr.	110,599,038	7,386,125
D. James Guzy		119,874,613	8,933,392
Marc O. Mayer		120,554,662	8,253,343

Marshall C. Turner, Jr.	120,537,225	8,270,780





		Voted For Voted Against	Abstained  Broker Non-Votes

2.Approve
the Amendment
and Restatement
of the Charter

		96,828,067  2,835,603	 9,283,228	0

3.A.
Diversification

		7,742,234   111,946	 58,552     2,342,967

3.B.
Issuing Senior
Securities and
Borrowing Money

		7,740,776   116,065	55,891	    2,342,967

3.C.
Underwriting
Securities

		7,741,340   114,828	56,564	    2,342,967

3.D.
Concentration
of Investments

		7,748,292   112,673	51,768	    2,342,967

3.E.
Real Estate
and Companies
that Deal
in Real Estate

		7,743,796   112,843	56,394	    2,342,967

3.F.
Commodity Contracts
and Futures Contracts

		7,719,568    137,274	55,891	    2,342,967

3.G.
Loans

		7,724,034    132,637	56,061	    2,342,967

3.L.
Purchases of
Securities
on Margin

		7,720,154    136,688	55,891	    2,342,967

3.M.
Short Sales

		7,720,657    134,948	57,128	    2,342,967

4.B.
The Reclassification
as Non-Fundamental and
Changes to Specific
Funds Investment
Objectives

		7,653,199     99,906	159,627	    2,342,967