Litigation	3 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Litigation [Abstract]
Litigation	6. LITIGATION Indiana Civil Litigation – A Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief and Request for Jury Trial was filed on March 3, 2011 in Elkhart, Indiana Superior Court by Leo VanNorman, et al, plaintiffs vs. Flexsteel Industries, Inc., et al, defendants. The complaint alleges that the source of groundwater contamination underneath plaintiffs’ current or former residences is two adjacent properties, in Elkhart, Indiana, once owned by the Company. The VanNorman case is set for a Phase 1 trial in May 2014 on the issue of cause or contribution to the Elkhart contamination. A subsequent Complaint for Damages under RICO and RPTL, and Injunctive Relief under RCRA, titled Dennis and Darlene Knoll, et al, vs. Flexsteel Industries, Inc., et al, was filed on May 5, 2012 in United States District Court Northern District of Indiana South Bend Division by a subgroup of the state court plaintiffs, as well as the current owner of one of the properties once owned by the Company. The District Court dismissed one of the two RCRA claims in March 2013, and dismissed both RICO claims in June 2013. One RCRA claim and a RPTL claim remain pending in the Knoll case. Relief sought in these complaints includes payment to Plaintiffs for their damages and attorneys’ fees and costs, payment to remove the contamination, payment for medical monitoring, and punitive damages. Based on policy language and jurisdiction, insurance coverage is in question. Flexsteel has filed an appeal to the Iowa Supreme Court regarding two adverse opinions of an Iowa District Court regarding coverage issues. The Company does not believe that it caused or contributed to the contamination. Plaintiffs have not identified a dollar amount of their alleged damages. Therefore, we are unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible outcomes or losses at this time. Accordingly, no accrual related to this matter has been recorded in the September 30, 2013 financial statements. During the quarters ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, legal and other related expenses of $1.0 million, $0.6 million, respectively, have been incurred responding to the state and federal lawsuits, as well as in pursuing insurance coverage. These costs are included in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income. Other Proceedings – From time to time, the Company is subject to various other legal proceedings, including lawsuits, which arise out of, and are incidental to, the conduct of the Company’s business. The Company does not consider any of such other proceedings that are currently pending, individually or in the aggregate, to be material to its business or likely to result in a material effect on its consolidated operating results, financial condition, or cash flows.

6. LITIGATION

Indiana Civil Litigation – A Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief and Request for Jury Trial was filed on March 3, 2011 in Elkhart, Indiana Superior Court by Leo VanNorman, et al, plaintiffs vs. Flexsteel Industries, Inc., et al, defendants. The complaint alleges that the source of groundwater contamination underneath plaintiffs’ current or former residences is two adjacent properties, in Elkhart, Indiana, once owned by the Company. The VanNorman case is set for a Phase 1 trial in May 2014 on the issue of cause or contribution to the Elkhart contamination. A subsequent Complaint for Damages under RICO and RPTL, and Injunctive Relief under RCRA, titled Dennis and Darlene Knoll, et al, vs. Flexsteel Industries, Inc., et al, was filed on May 5, 2012 in United States District Court Northern District of Indiana South Bend Division by a subgroup of the state court plaintiffs, as well as the current owner of one of the properties once owned by the Company. The District Court dismissed one of the two RCRA claims in March 2013, and dismissed both RICO claims in June 2013. One RCRA claim and a RPTL claim remain pending in the Knoll case. Relief sought in these complaints includes payment to Plaintiffs for their damages and attorneys’ fees and costs, payment to remove the contamination, payment for medical monitoring, and punitive damages. Based on policy language and jurisdiction, insurance coverage is in question. Flexsteel has filed an appeal to the Iowa Supreme Court regarding two adverse opinions of an Iowa District Court regarding coverage issues. The Company does not believe that it caused or contributed to the contamination.

Plaintiffs have not identified a dollar amount of their alleged damages. Therefore, we are unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible outcomes or losses at this time. Accordingly, no accrual related to this matter has been recorded in the September 30, 2013 financial statements. During the quarters ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, legal and other related expenses of $1.0 million, $0.6 million, respectively, have been incurred responding to the state and federal lawsuits, as well as in pursuing insurance coverage. These costs are included in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Other Proceedings – From time to time, the Company is subject to various other legal proceedings, including lawsuits, which arise out of, and are incidental to, the conduct of the Company’s business. The Company does not consider any of such other proceedings that are currently pending, individually or in the aggregate, to be material to its business or likely to result in a material effect on its consolidated operating results, financial condition, or cash flows.