EX-99.(B) 3 dex99b.htm THE PRESENTATION The Presentation
Wells Fargo + Wachovia
A Combined Premier Financial Services Company
A Superior Deal for Shareholders
October 3, 2008
Exhibit (99)(b)


2
Forward-Looking Statements
This presentation includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Such
statements include, but are not limited to, statements about expected cost savings and other benefits of the merger between Wells Fargo and
Wachovia, expected integration costs of the merger, and the combined company’s plans, objectives, expectations and intentions for the future.
You should not unduly rely on forward-looking statements.  They are based on the current beliefs and expectations of Wells Fargo’s
management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties.  The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this
presentation, and Wells Fargo does not undertake to update such statements to reflect changes that occur after that date. 
There
are
a
number
of
factors
that
could
cause
actual
results
to
differ
from
those
set
forth
in
the
forward-looking
statements.
These
factors
include,
but
are
not
limited
to:
the
risk
that
the
credit
crisis
will
continue
longer
or
be
more
severe
than
expected;
the
risk
that
Wells
Fargo
will
incur
more
credit
losses
from
Wachovia’s
loan
portfolio
than
expected;
the
inability
to
obtain
required
approvals
of
the
merger
from
regulatory
authorities on the proposed terms and schedule; the risk that the businesses will not be integrated successfully; the risk that cost savings and
other expected benefits of the merger may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected; the risk that deposit attrition will be
greater than expected; the risk that disruption from the merger may make it more difficult to maintain business and operational relationships; the
risk of new and changing governmental regulation; and the exposure of Wells Fargo to additional litigation as a result of the merger.  Additional
factors are described in Wells Fargo’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as updated by Wells Fargo’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.  Such reports are available on the website of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (www.sec.gov). 
INFORMATION ABOUT THE MERGER
The proposed merger will be submitted to Wachovia Corporation shareholders for their consideration. Wells Fargo will file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) a registration statement on Form S-4 that will include a proxy statement of Wachovia Corporation that also
constitutes a prospectus of Wells Fargo. Wachovia Corporation will mail the proxy statement-prospectus to its shareholders. Wachovia share-
holders and other investors are urged to read the final proxy statement-prospectus when it becomes available because it will describe the
proposed
merger
and
contain
other
important
information.
You
may
obtain
copies
of
all
documents
filed
with
the
SEC
regarding
the
proposed
merger, free of charge, at the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov).  Wells Fargo and Wachovia and their respective directors and executive officers
may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from Wachovia Corporation shareholders in connection with the proposed
merger. Information about each company’s directors and executive officers and their ownership of the company’s common stock is contained in
the definitive proxy statement filed for each company with respect to their respective 2008 annual meeting.


3
Transaction Overview
Terms
Fixed exchange ratio
0.1991 Wells Fargo shares for each Wachovia share
$7.00 per Wachovia share¹
Total consideration of $15.1 billion¹
Structure
Whole company transaction: nothing left behind
No FDIC assistance
Capital raise
Wells Fargo anticipates raising capital of up to $20 billion
¹
Based on Wells Fargo’s closing price on October 2, 2008 of $35.16


4
Transaction Overview
Revenue and credit
assumptions:
Synergies:
Merger costs:
Targeted close:
Due diligence:
Remaining approvals:
Includes conservative deposit run-off and
credit assumptions
$5 billion annual expense reduction
$10 billion
Fourth quarter 2008
Completed
Regulatory approvals
Wachovia shareholders


5
The New Wells Fargo
Source: SNL Financial and Company data
Note:
Financial
data
as
of
June
30,
2008.
Banking
store
data
as
of
September
18,
2008.
Deposit
and
store
data
include
all
pending
bank
acquisitions,
and
exclude
Bank
of
America’s acquisition of Merrill Lynch.  Total Net Loans include Held for Sale
U.S. Banking Stores
U.S. Deposits ($ billions)
Rank
Institution
Stores (#)
Rank
Institution
Deposits
1
Pro forma Wells Fargo
6,675
1
Pro forma Wells Fargo
$713
2
Bank of America
6,138
2
Bank of America
697
3
JPMorgan Chase
5,410
3
JPMorgan Chase
670
-
Wachovia
3,348
-
Wachovia
420
-
Wells Fargo
3,327
-
Wells Fargo
294
4
U.S. Bancorp
2,649
4
Citi
261
Company Data ($ millions)
Assets
$609,074
$812,433
Total Net Loans
417,776
485,884
Deposits
339,124
447,790
Core deposits
310,410
400,387
Mutual fund AUM
151,306
107,100


6
Source: SNL Financial
Note: Data as of September 18, 2008
Unparalleled Market Position
Largest,
Most
Extensive
Banking
Store
Network
Across
the
U.S.
Wells
Fargo
retail
banking
stores
3,327
Wachovia
retail
banking
stores
3,348
Total
combined
retail
banking
stores
6,675


7
$11.2
$15.1
$39.6
$59.8
$10.2
$95.9
$27.6
$13.8
$20.6
$20.8
$3.3
$5.5
$26.2
$22.5
$21.2
California
Florida
Texas
New Jersey
North
Carolina
Virginia
Georgia
Pennsylvania
Arizona
Colorado
Minnesota
Wells Fargo
Wachovia
Adjusted deposits in key states -
$ in billions
Adjusted deposits in key states -
$ in billions
Source: SNL Financial
Note: Deposit data as of June 30, 2007, pro forma for acquisitions; excludes deposits greater than $500mm in a single banking store
¹
Unadjusted
deposits
(includes
deposits
greater
than
$500mm
in-a
single-banking-store)
²
2007-2012
Leading Market Share from
Coast to Coast
$135.5
$59.8
$37.8
$26.2
$22.5
$21.2
$20.8
$20.6
$17.0
$16.7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
21.8%
18.7%
13.0%
20.0%
19.3%
19.7%
15.1%
9.8%
24.6%
23.2%
19.7%
2,530
2,418
2,372
331
805
614
1,129
267
1,079
417
325
6.8%
12.8%
9.9%
3.7%
8.9%
7.8%
11.7%
2.1%
17.0%
8.5%
6.1%
% of total
Deposits¹ in states with #1 rank
67%
Deposits¹ in states with top 2 rank
85
Deposits¹ in states with top 3 rank
93
$15.1
Market share
Rank
Pop growth (%)²
Pop growth (000)²


8
Strong Retail Distribution and
Customer Base
Powerful Retail Distribution
Combined
Banking stores (#)
3,327
3,348
6,675
Total stores (#)
5,941
4,820
10,761
ATMs (#)
6,950
5,277
12,227
Significant Customer Base
Combined
Total retail households (mm)
11.2
15.0
26.2
Active online customers (mm)
10.6
5.1
15.7
States in footprint (#)
24
21
39
Source: Company filings
¹
Not adjusted for customers in common
²
Six overlapping
+
+
1
1
2


9
Significant Competitive Advantages
Source: Company filings, SNL Financial
Presence in growth markets
50% of U.S. population growth in footprint
80% of U.S. population growth in footprint
Penetration of affluent entrepreneurs
#1 small business lender
Top 10 wealth manager
Consumer Banking
Competitive advantage in cross-sell
Most #1 rankings in customer satisfaction
among U.S. Banks
Middle Market Commercial
Leading relationship bank in the West
#1 in Southeast
Insurance
Largest Bank-owned Insurance Brokerage
Nation's largest distributor of annuities
Trade Finance / Global Payments
Deep relationships with U.S. exporters
and leading position in global remittance
World-class international correspondent
banking network
Treasury Services
#1 cash management provider in market
Leading cash management provider on
East coast
Mutual Funds
$151.3 billion in AUM
$107.1 billion in AUM


Pro Forma Financial Review


11
Balance sheet adjustments
($42)
$270
Total Consumer
Estimated Lifetime Losses & 
($24)
$228
Total Commercial
(3)
60
Foreign / Leasing
(12)
46
Total CRE
$ billions
($74)
Total
($8)
Other Marks
($65)
$498 ²
Total Loans
(3)
88
Other Consumer
(7)
60
Home Equity
($32)
$122
Pick-A-Pay
($9)
$123
Commercial
Market Value Adjustments¹
Balance
6/30/2008
¹
To be included in purchase accounting or post acquisition financial results over time
²
Balances as of June 30  , 2008, before unearned income ($10 billion)
th


12
Capital
$
billions
6/30/2008
Estimated 12/31/08 pro forma
Wells Fargo
Wells Fargo
Assets (regulatory)
Total assets
$609
$1,371
Tangible assets
595
1,342
Risk-weighted assets
516
1,094
Average assets for leverage ratio
577
1,342
Capital (regulatory)
Tangibile common equity
$33
$50
Tier 1 capital
44
82
Total capital
60
121
Capital ratios
TCE/TA (regulatory)
5.6%
3.7%
Leverage
7.4
6.1
Tier 1 capital
8.2
7.5
Total capital
11.2
11.1
Note: Reflects $20 billion capital raise.  24-month extension of deferred tax asset exclusion limits pending final regulatory approval


13
P&L Impact
Cost Savings
Approximately $5 billion annually, or approximately 10% of
combined 2008 non-interest expense
Majority of cost synergies achievable by end of 2010
Disciplined approach to banking store integration
Merger Costs
Estimated transaction-related costs of approximately $10 billion
EPS Impact
Expect majority of credit costs related to legacy portfolio to be
incurred in the next two years, and the transaction to add
meaningfully to EPS thereafter


14
Conclusion
Strategic Fit
Greatly enhances retail banking platform in attractive markets
Combined deposits of $787 billion ($713 billion U.S. deposits)
and 6,675 banking stores
Increases market share in existing fast-growing markets
#1 in 9 of top 10 key states
Expands footprint into attractive new markets –
Miami to New
York City
Successful, experienced acquiror: 280 transactions over past 20 years,
including Wells Fargo / Norwest merger
Increases scale of wholesale banking platform
Extends product capabilities
Combination with Wachovia creates the premier
Coast-to-Coast financial services franchise


Appendix


16
#1 Rank in 10 of Top 20 MSAs
Concentration in fast-growing MSAs
Source: SNL Financial
Note: Deposit data as of June 30, 2007, pro forma for acquisitions; excludes deposits greater than $500mm in a single store
Top 20 MSAs in the United States Ranked by Deposit Size ($bn)
Deposits
Deposit growth
Pro forma Wells Fargo
2007
2002-2007 CAGR
Rank
Market share
($bn)
(%)
Presence
#
(%)
1
New York
$462
5.1%
5
6.1%
2
Los Angeles
258
6.9
1
16.8
3
Chicago
193
5.2
8
0.7
4
Miami
122
7.3
1
19.1
5
Philadelphia
108
5.4
1
15.1
6
San Francisco
107
4.7
1
28.3
7
Boston
92
2.3
NM
0.0
8
Washington
90
6.4
2
12.7
9
Dallas
77
8.1
3
12.3
10
Atlanta
75
9.4
1
20.6
11
Houston
73
7.6
2
16.5
12
Detroit
64
3.4
NM
0.0
13
Seattle
51
7.2
4
8.6
14
Phoenix
46
10.1
1
24.5
15
St Louis
46
3.9
NM
0.0
16
San Diego
45
7.1
1
22.8
17
San Jose
45
5.2
1
30.0
18
Pittsburgh
45
3.5
NM
0.0
19
Minneapolis
43
5.3
1
24.3
20
Tampa
40
6.1
1
20.3