XML 77 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Mortgage Banking
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Mortgage Banking [Abstract]  
Mortgage Banking
Note 6 Mortgage Banking

The activity in mortgage servicing rights (MSR) is detailed in the table below for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

  
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
  
2014
  
2013
 
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
67,834
  
$
47,341
 
Origination of servicing assets
  
8,884
   
15,551
 
Change in fair value:
        
Due to market changes
  
(3,060
)
  
7,881
 
Due to runoff
  
(6,568
)
  
(7,623
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
67,090
  
$
63,150
 
 
During the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, Trustmark sold $671.2 million and $1.132 billion, respectively, of residential mortgage loans.  Pretax gains on these sales were recorded to noninterest income in mortgage banking, net and totaled $7.9 million for the first nine months of 2014 compared to $24.2 million for the first nine months of 2013.  Trustmark's mortgage loans serviced for others totaled $5.586 billion at September 30, 2014, compared with $5.461 billion at December 31, 2013.  The table below details the mortgage loans sold and serviced for others for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

  
September 30, 2014
  
December 31, 2013
 
Federal National Mortgage Association
 
$
3,556,490
  
$
3,499,659
 
Government National Mortgage Association
  
1,916,010
   
1,830,420
 
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
  
83,250
   
92,599
 
Other
  
30,023
   
38,998
 
Total mortage loans sold and serviced for others
 
$
5,585,773
  
$
5,461,676
 

Trustmark is subject to losses in its loan servicing portfolio due to loan foreclosures.  Trustmark has obligations to either repurchase the outstanding principal balance of a loan or make the purchaser whole for the economic benefits of a loan if it is determined that the loan sold was in violation of representations or warranties made by Trustmark at the time of the sale, herein referred to as mortgage loan servicing putback expenses.  Such representations and warranties typically include those made regarding loans that had missing or insufficient file documentation, loans that do not meet investor guidelines, loans in which the appraisal does not support the value and/or loans obtained through fraud by the borrowers or other third parties.  Generally, putback requests may be made until the loan is paid in full.  However, mortgage loans delivered to Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) on or after January 1, 2013 are subject to the Lending and Selling Representations and Warranties Framework updated in May 2014, which provides certain instances in which a mortgage loan is eligible for relief from selling representations and warranties, such as payment history and quality control review.

When a putback request is received, Trustmark evaluates the request and takes appropriate actions based on the nature of the request.  Effective January 1, 2013, Trustmark was required by FNMA and FHLMC to provide a response to putback requests within 60 days of the date of receipt.  Currently, putback requests primarily relate to 2009 through 2013 vintage mortgage loans.  The total mortgage loan servicing putback expenses, included in other noninterest expense, incurred by Trustmark during the first nine months of 2014 and 2013 were $450 thousand and $1.0 million, respectively.

Changes in the reserve for mortgage loan servicing putback expense were as follows for the periods presented ($ in thousands):

  
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
 
2014
  
2013
 
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
1,050
  
$
7,800
 
Provision for putback expenses
  
450
   
1,050
 
Losses
  
(403
)
  
(3,867
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
1,097
  
$
4,983
 

During November 2013, Trustmark finalized its agreement with FNMA (the "Resolution Agreement") to resolve its existing and future repurchase and make whole obligations (collectively “Repurchase Obligations”) related to mortgage loans originated between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2008 and delivered to FNMA.  Under the terms of the Resolution Agreement, Trustmark paid FNMA approximately $3.6 million with respect to the Repurchase Obligations.  Trustmark believes that it was in its best interests to execute the Resolution Agreement in order to bring finality to the loss reimbursement exposure with FNMA for these years and reduce the resources spent on individual file reviews and defending loss reimbursement requests.  The Repurchase Obligations were covered by Trustmark’s existing reserve for mortgage loan servicing putback expenses.
 
Mortgage loans covered by the Resolution Agreement executed with FNMA are only subject to putback risk due to borrower fraud or systemic risk.  Trustmark’s exposure to putback requests for loans sold to FNMA, which were originated after 2008, has improved as a result of industry-wide guidelines and process enhancements implemented since that time.  Trustmark’s exposure to putback requests for loans sold to GNMA has improved as a result of declining delinquency ratios.  Please refer to the “Past Due LHFS” section included in Note 4 – Loans Held for Investment (LHFI) and Allowance for Loan Losses, LHFI for additional information regarding mortgage loans sold to GNMA.

There is inherent uncertainty in reasonably estimating the requirement for reserves against future mortgage loan servicing putback expenses.  Future putback expenses are dependent on many subjective factors, including the review procedures of the purchasers and the potential refinance activity on loans sold with servicing released and the subsequent consequences under the representations and warranties.  Trustmark believes that it has appropriately reserved for potential mortgage loan servicing putback requests.