XML 29 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value [Abstract]  
Fair Value
Note 18 – Fair Value

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value

The methodologies Trustmark uses in determining the fair values are based primarily on the use of independent, market-based data to reflect a value that would be reasonably expected upon exchange of the position in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  The large majority of assets that are stated at fair value are of a nature that can be valued using prices or inputs that are readily observable through a variety of independent data providers.  The providers selected by Trustmark for fair valuation data are widely recognized and accepted vendors whose evaluations support the pricing functions of financial institutions, investment and mutual funds, and portfolio managers.  Trustmark has documented and evaluated the pricing methodologies used by the vendors and maintains internal processes that regularly test valuations for anomalies.

Trustmark utilizes an independent pricing service to advise it on the carrying value of the securities available for sale portfolio.  As part of Trustmark's procedures, the price provided from the service is evaluated for reasonableness given market changes.  When a questionable price exists, Trustmark investigates further to determine if the price is valid.  If needed, other market participants may be utilized to determine the correct fair value.  Trustmark has also reviewed and confirmed its determinations in thorough discussions with the pricing source regarding their methods of price discovery.

Mortgage loan commitments are valued based on the securities prices of similar collateral, term, rate and delivery for which the loan is eligible to deliver in place of the particular security.  Trustmark acquires a broad array of mortgage security prices that are supplied by a market data vendor, which in turn accumulates prices from a broad list of securities dealers.  Prices are processed through a mortgage pipeline management system that accumulates and segregates all loan commitment and forward-sale transactions according to the similarity of various characteristics (maturity, term, rate, and collateral).  Prices are matched to those positions that are deemed to be an eligible substitute or offset (i.e., “deliverable”) for a corresponding security observed in the market place.

Trustmark estimates fair value of MSR through the use of prevailing market participant assumptions and market participant valuation processes.  This valuation is periodically tested and validated against other third-party firm valuations.
 
Trustmark obtains the fair value of interest rate swaps from a third-party pricing service that uses an industry standard discounted cash flow methodology. In addition, credit valuation adjustments are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk.  In adjusting the fair value of its interest rate swap contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, Trustmark has considered any applicable credit enhancements such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.

Trustmark has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its interest rate swaps offered to qualified commercial borrowers fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, while the credit valuation adjustments associated with these derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads.  Trustmark has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its interest rate swaps and has determined that the credit valuation adjustment is not significant to the overall valuation of these derivatives.  As a result, Trustmark classifies its interest rate swap valuations in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Trustmark also utilizes derivative instruments such as Treasury note futures contracts and exchange-traded option contracts to achieve a fair value return that offsets the changes in fair value of MSR attributable to interest rates.  These derivative instruments are exchange-traded and provide inputs, which allow them to be classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, Trustmark utilizes derivative instruments such as interest rate lock commitments in its mortgage banking area which lack observable inputs for valuation purposes resulting in their inclusion in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

At this time, Trustmark presents no fair values that are derived through internal modeling.  Should positions requiring fair valuation arise that are not relevant to existing methodologies, Trustmark will make every reasonable effort to obtain market participant assumptions, or independent evaluation.

Financial Assets and Liabilities

The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, segregated by the level of valuation inputs with the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value ($ in thousands):

   
December 31, 2011
 
   
Total
  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
 
U.S. Government agency obligations
 $64,805  $-  $64,805  $- 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
  202,827   -   202,827   - 
Mortgage-backed securities
  2,201,361   -   2,201,361   - 
Securities available for sale
  2,468,993   -   2,468,993   - 
Loans held for sale
  216,553   -   216,553   - 
Mortgage servicing rights
  43,274   -   -   43,274 
Other assets - derivatives
  3,521   1,130   1,689   702 
Other liabilities - derivatives
  4,680   694   3,986   - 
                  
   
December 31, 2010
 
   
Total
  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
 
U.S. Government agency obligations
 $122,035  $-  $122,035  $- 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
  159,637   -   159,637   - 
Mortgage-backed securities
  1,895,577   -   1,895,577   - 
Securities available for sale
  2,177,249   -   2,177,249   - 
Loans held for sale
  153,044   -   153,044   - 
Mortgage servicing rights
  51,151   -   -   51,151 
Other assets - derivatives
  (2,247)  (2,584)  -   337 
Other liabilities - derivatives
  (1,581)  1,562   (3,143)  - 
 
The changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 are summarized as follows ($ in thousands):
 
  MSR  Other Assets - Derivatives 
Balance, January 1, 2010
 $50,513  $(61)
Total net (losses) gains included in net income (1)
  (16,247)  4,382 
Additions
  16,885   - 
Sales
  -   (3,984)
Balance, December 31, 2010
  51,151   337 
Total net (losses) gains included in net income (1)
  (22,037)  3,968 
Additions
  14,160   - 
Sales
  -   (3,603)
Balance, December 31, 2011
 $43,274  $702 
          
The amount of total (losses) gains for the period included in earnings that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses still held at December 31, 2011
 $(15,130) $64 

(1)
Total net (losses) gains included in net income relating to MSR includes changes in fair value due to market changes and due to runoff.

Trustmark may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Assets at December 31, 2011, which have been measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, include impaired loans.  Loans for which it is probable Trustmark will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Specific allowances for impaired loans are based on comparisons of the recorded carrying values of the loans to the present value of the estimated cash flows of these loans at each loan's original effective interest rate, the fair value of the collateral or the observable market prices of the loans.  At December 31, 2011, Trustmark had outstanding balances of $68.9 million in impaired loans that were specifically identified for evaluation and written down to fair value of the underlying collateral less cost to sell based on the fair value of the collateral or other unobservable input compared with $97.6 million at December 31, 2010.  These impaired loans are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Please refer to Note 2 – Business Combinations, for financial assets and liabilities acquired in the Heritage transaction, which were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities

Certain nonfinancial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include foreclosed assets (upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment), nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a goodwill impairment test, and intangible assets and other nonfinancial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment.
 
Certain foreclosed assets, upon initial recognition, are remeasured and reported at fair value through a charge-off to the allowance for loan losses based upon the fair value of the foreclosed asset. The fair value of a foreclosed asset, upon initial recognition, is estimated using Level 3 inputs based on adjusted observable market data.  Foreclosed assets measured at fair value upon initial recognition totaled $56.9 million (utilizing Level 3 valuation inputs) during the year ended December 31, 2011 compared with $61.8 million for the same period in 2010.  In connection with the measurement and initial recognition of the foregoing foreclosed assets, Trustmark recognized charge-offs of the allowance for loan losses totaling $6.7 million and $5.5 million for year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Other than foreclosed assets measured at fair value upon initial recognition, $66.7 million of foreclosed assets were remeasured during 2011, requiring write-downs of $13.9 million to reach their current fair values compared to $54.2 million of foreclosed assets that were remeasured during 2010, requiring write-downs of $17.1 million.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at December 31, 2011 and 2010, are as follows ($ in thousands):
 
   
2011
  
2010
   
Carrying
  
Estimated
  
Carrying
  
Estimated
 
   
Value
  
Fair Value
  
Value
  
Fair Value
 
Financial Assets:
            
Cash and short-term investments
 $211,883  $211,883  $173,317  $173,317 
Securities available for sale
  2,468,993   2,468,993   2,177,249   2,177,249 
Securities held to maturity
  57,705   62,515   140,847   145,143 
Loans held for sale
  216,553   216,553   153,044   153,044 
Net LHFI,  excluding covered loans
  5,767,966   5,848,791   5,966,732   6,030,219 
Covered loans
  76,302   76,302   -   - 
FDIC indemnification asset
  28,348   28,348   -   - 
Other assets - derivatives
  3,521   3,521   (2,247)  (2,247)
                  
Financial Liabilities:
                
Deposits
  7,566,363   7,575,064   7,044,567   7,054,611 
Short-term liabilities
  692,128   692,128   1,125,481   1,125,481 
Subordinated notes
  49,839   51,438   49,806   48,750 
Junior subordinated debt securities
  61,856   35,876   61,856   30,928 
Other liabilities - derivatives
  4,680   4,680   (1,581)  (1,581)
 
The methodology and significant assumptions used in estimating the fair values presented above are as follows:

In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are generally based on estimates using present value techniques. Trustmark's premise in present value techniques is to represent the fair values on a basis of replacement value of the existing instrument given observed market rates on the measurement date. These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows.  In that regard, the derived fair value estimates for those assets or liabilities cannot be necessarily substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realizable in immediate settlement of the instruments.  The estimated fair value of financial instruments with immediate and shorter-term maturities (generally 90 days or less) is assumed to be the same as the recorded book value.  All nonfinancial instruments, by definition, have been excluded from these disclosure requirements.  Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of Trustmark.

Cash and Short-Term Investments

The carrying amounts for cash and due from banks and short-term investments (federal funds sold and securities purchased under reverse repurchase agreements) approximate fair values due to their immediate and shorter-term maturities.

Securities

Estimated fair values for securities available for sale and securities held to maturity are based on quoted market prices where available. If quoted market prices are not available, estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

Loans Held for Sale

The fair value of loans held for sale is based on independent quoted market prices, where available, or the prices for other mortgage whole loans with similar characteristics.

Net LHFI, excluding Covered Loans

The fair values of net loans are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics.  For variable rate loans that reprice frequently with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values of certain mortgage loans, such as 1-4 family residential properties, are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold in conjunction with securitization transactions, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. The fair values of other types of loans are estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.  The processes for estimating the fair value of net loans described above does not represent an exit price under FASB ASC Topic 820 and such an exit price could potentially produce a different fair value estimate at December 31, 2011 and 2010.
 
Covered Loans

The fair value of covered loans is based on estimates of future loan cash flows and appropriate discount rates, which incorporate Trustmark's assumptions about market funding cost and liquidity premium. The estimates of future loan cash flows are determined using Trustmark's assumptions concerning the amount and timing of principal and interest payments, prepayments and credit losses.

FDIC Indemnification Asset

The fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset is estimated by discounting estimated future cash flows based on estimated current market rates.

Other Assets and Other Liabilities – Derivatives

The fair value of derivatives used to hedge MSR (futures and exchange-traded written and purchased options) is based on quoted prices from a recognized exchange.  The fair value of interest rate lock commitments utilizes a valuation model, which recognizes the full fair value of the ultimate loan adjusted for estimated fallout and estimated cost assumptions a market participant would use to convert the lock into a loan in addition to expected net future cash flows related to loan servicing activities.  Forward sales contracts are derivative instruments whose fair value is determined based on independent quoted market prices, where available, or the prices for other mortgage whole loans with similar characteristics.

Deposits

The fair values of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, NOW accounts, MMDA products and savings accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand, which is the carrying value. Fair values for certificates of deposit are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.  The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Short-Term Liabilities

The carrying amounts for federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements and other borrowings approximate their fair values.

Subordinated Notes

Fair value equals quoted market prices, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar subordinated notes.

Junior Subordinated Debt Securities

Fair value equals quoted market prices, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar junior subordinated debt securities.

Off-Balance Sheet Instruments

The fair values of loan commitments and letters of credit approximate the fees currently charged for similar agreements or the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle similar obligations.  The fees associated with these financial instruments, or the estimated cost to terminate, as applicable, are immaterial.