XML 35 R27.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.1
Fair Value
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2025
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value

Note 17 – Fair Value

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value

The methodologies Trustmark uses in determining the fair values are based primarily on the use of independent, market-based data to reflect a value that would be reasonably expected upon exchange of the position in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The predominant portion of assets that are stated at fair value are of a nature that can be valued using prices or inputs that are readily observable through a variety of independent data providers. The providers selected by Trustmark for fair valuation data are widely recognized and accepted vendors whose evaluations support the pricing functions of financial institutions, investment and mutual funds, and portfolio managers. Trustmark has documented and evaluated the pricing methodologies used by the vendors and maintains internal processes that regularly test valuations for anomalies.

Trustmark utilizes an independent pricing service to advise it on the carrying value of the securities available for sale portfolio. As part of Trustmark’s procedures, the price provided from the service is evaluated for reasonableness given market changes. When a questionable price exists, Trustmark investigates further to determine if the price is valid. If needed, other market participants may be utilized to determine the correct fair value. Trustmark has also reviewed and confirmed its determinations in thorough discussions with the pricing source regarding their methods of price discovery.

Mortgage loan commitments are valued based on the securities prices of similar collateral, term, rate and delivery for which the loan is eligible to deliver in place of the particular security. Trustmark acquires a broad array of mortgage security prices that are supplied by a market data vendor, which in turn accumulates prices from a broad list of securities dealers. Prices are processed through a mortgage pipeline management system that accumulates and segregates all loan commitment and forward-sale transactions according to the similarity of various characteristics (maturity, term, rate, and collateral). Prices are matched to those positions that are deemed to be an eligible substitute or offset (i.e., “deliverable”) for a corresponding security observed in the marketplace.

Trustmark estimates the fair value of the MSR through the use of prevailing market participant assumptions and market participant valuation processes. This valuation is periodically tested and validated against other third-party firm valuations.

Trustmark obtains the fair value of interest rate swaps from a third-party pricing service that uses an industry standard discounted cash flow methodology. In addition, credit valuation adjustments are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk. In adjusting the fair value of its interest rate swap contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, Trustmark has considered any applicable credit enhancements such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees. In conjunction with the FASB’s fair value measurement guidance, Trustmark made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of these derivative financial instruments, which are subject to master netting agreements, on a net basis by counterparty portfolio.

Trustmark has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its interest rate swaps offered to qualified commercial borrowers fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, while the credit valuation adjustments associated with these derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads. Trustmark has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its interest rate swaps and has determined that the credit valuation adjustment is not significant to the overall valuation of these derivatives. As a result, Trustmark classifies its interest rate swap valuations in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Trustmark also utilizes exchange-traded derivative instruments such as Treasury note futures contracts and option contracts to achieve a fair value return that offsets the changes in fair value of the MSR attributable to interest rates. Fair values of these derivative instruments are determined from quoted prices in active markets for identical assets therefore allowing them to be classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, Trustmark utilizes derivative instruments such as interest rate lock commitments in its mortgage banking area which lack observable inputs for valuation purposes resulting in their inclusion in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

At this time, Trustmark presents no fair values that are derived through internal modeling. Should positions requiring fair valuation arise that are not relevant to existing methodologies, Trustmark will make every reasonable effort to obtain market participant assumptions, or independent evaluation.

Financial Assets and Liabilities

The following tables summarize financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, segregated by the level of valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value ($ in thousands). There were no transfers between fair value levels for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and the year ended December 31, 2024.

 

 

 

March 31, 2025

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

U.S. Treasury securities

 

$

212,463

 

 

$

212,463

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

U.S. Government agency obligations

 

 

49,325

 

 

 

 

 

 

49,325

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

1,475,674

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,475,674

 

 

 

 

Securities available for sale

 

 

1,737,462

 

 

 

212,463

 

 

 

1,524,999

 

 

 

 

LHFS

 

 

188,689

 

 

 

 

 

 

188,689

 

 

 

 

MSR

 

 

134,395

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

134,395

 

Other assets - derivatives

 

 

17,469

 

 

 

1,137

 

 

 

15,544

 

 

 

788

 

Other liabilities - derivatives

 

 

28,768

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

28,729

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2024

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

U.S. Treasury securities

 

$

202,669

 

 

$

202,669

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

U.S. Government agency obligations

 

 

38,807

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,807

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

1,451,058

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,451,058

 

 

 

 

Securities available for sale

 

 

1,692,534

 

 

 

202,669

 

 

 

1,489,865

 

 

 

 

LHFS

 

 

200,307

 

 

 

 

 

 

200,307

 

 

 

 

MSR

 

 

139,317

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

139,317

 

Other assets - derivatives

 

 

15,397

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

15,150

 

 

 

229

 

Other liabilities - derivatives

 

 

41,355

 

 

 

2,183

 

 

 

39,172

 

 

 

 

 

The changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 are summarized as follows ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

MSR

 

 

Other Assets -
Derivatives

 

Balance, January 1, 2025

 

$

139,317

 

 

$

229

 

Total net (loss) gain included in Mortgage banking, net (1)

 

 

(7,990

)

 

 

748

 

Additions

 

 

3,068

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

 

 

 

 

(189

)

Balance, March 31, 2025

 

$

134,395

 

 

$

788

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings
   that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or
   losses still held at March 31, 2025

 

$

(5,928

)

 

$

345

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, January 1, 2024

 

$

131,870

 

 

$

845

 

Total net (loss) gain included in Mortgage banking, net (1)

 

 

3,197

 

 

 

1,047

 

Additions

 

 

2,977

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

 

 

 

 

(735

)

Balance, March 31, 2024

 

$

138,044

 

 

$

1,157

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in
   earnings that are attributable to the change in unrealized
   gains or losses still held at March 31, 2024

 

$

5,123

 

 

$

927

 

 

(1)
Total net (loss) gain included in Mortgage banking, net relating to the MSR includes changes in fair value due to market changes and due to run-off.

Trustmark may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Assets at March 31, 2025, which have been measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, include collateral-dependent LHFI. A loan is collateral dependent when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment of the loan is expected to be provided substantially through the sale of the collateral. The expected credit loss for collateral-dependent loans is measured as the difference between the amortized cost basis of the loan and the fair value of the collateral, adjusted for the estimated cost to sell. Fair value estimates for collateral-dependent loans are derived from appraised values based on the current market value or as is value of the collateral, normally from recently received and reviewed appraisals. Current appraisals are ordered on an annual basis based on the inspection date or more often if market conditions necessitate. Appraisals are obtained from state-certified appraisers and are based on certain assumptions, which may include construction or development status and the highest and best use of the property. These appraisals are reviewed by Trustmark’s Appraisal Review Department to ensure they are acceptable, and values are adjusted down for costs associated with asset disposal. At March 31, 2025, Trustmark had outstanding balances of $35.0 million with a related ACL of $14.0 million in collateral-dependent LHFI, compared to outstanding balances of $37.1 million with a related ACL of $13.7 million in collateral-dependent LHFI at December 31, 2024. The collateral-dependent LHFI are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities

Certain nonfinancial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include foreclosed assets (upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment), nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a goodwill impairment test, and intangible assets and other nonfinancial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment.

Other real estate includes assets that have been acquired in satisfaction of debt through foreclosure and is recorded at the fair value less cost to sell (estimated fair value) at the time of foreclosure. Fair value is based on independent appraisals and other relevant factors. In the determination of fair value subsequent to foreclosure, Management also considers other factors or recent developments, such as changes in market conditions from the time of valuation and anticipated sales values considering plans for disposition, which could result in an adjustment to lower the collateral value estimates indicated in the appraisals. Periodic revaluations are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy since assumptions are used that may not be observable in the market.

Foreclosed assets of $533 thousand were remeasured during the first three months of 2025, requiring write-downs of $111 thousand to reach their current fair values compared to $194 thousand of foreclosed assets that were remeasured during the first three months of 2024, requiring write-downs of $34 thousand.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, are as follows ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

March 31, 2025

 

 

December 31, 2024

 

 

 

Carrying
Value

 

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

 

Carrying
Value

 

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Financial Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Level 2 Inputs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and short-term investments

 

$

587,362

 

 

$

587,362

 

 

$

567,251

 

 

$

567,251

 

Securities held to maturity

 

 

1,315,053

 

 

 

1,259,898

 

 

 

1,335,385

 

 

 

1,259,107

 

Level 3 Inputs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net LHFI

 

 

13,074,459

 

 

 

13,040,321

 

 

 

12,929,672

 

 

 

12,886,168

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Level 2 Inputs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

 

15,080,704

 

 

 

15,070,082

 

 

 

15,108,175

 

 

 

15,098,854

 

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under
   repurchase agreements

 

 

360,080

 

 

 

360,080

 

 

 

324,008

 

 

 

324,008

 

Other borrowings

 

 

404,815

 

 

 

404,815

 

 

 

301,541

 

 

 

301,541

 

Subordinated notes

 

 

123,757

 

 

 

122,188

 

 

 

123,702

 

 

 

120,625

 

Junior subordinated debt securities

 

 

61,856

 

 

 

50,103

 

 

 

61,856

 

 

 

49,794

 

 

Fair Value Option

Trustmark has elected to account for its LHFS under the fair value option, with interest income on these LHFS reported in interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI. The fair value of the LHFS is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset, adjusted for specific attributes of that loan. The LHFS are actively managed and monitored and certain market risks of the loans may be mitigated through the use of derivatives. These derivative instruments are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as noninterest income (loss) in mortgage banking, net. The changes in the fair value of LHFS are largely offset by changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, a net gain of $643 thousand was recorded as noninterest income (loss) in mortgage banking, net for changes in the fair value of LHFS accounted for under the fair value option, compared to net loss of $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. Interest and fees on LHFS and LHFI for the three months ended March 31, 2025 included $1.9 million of interest earned on LHFS accounted for under the fair value option, compared to $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. Election of the fair value option allows Trustmark to reduce the accounting volatility that would otherwise result from the asymmetry created by accounting for the financial instruments at the lower of cost or fair value and the derivatives at fair value. The fair value option election does not apply to GNMA optional repurchase loans which do not meet the requirements under FASB ASC Topic 825 to be accounted for under the fair value option. GNMA optional repurchase loans totaled $96.0 million and $97.6 million at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, and are included in LHFS on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. For additional information regarding GNMA optional repurchase loans, please see the section captioned “Past Due LHFS” included in Note 3 – LHFI and ACL, LHFI.

The following table provides information about the fair value and the contractual principal outstanding of the LHFS accounted for under the fair value option at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

March 31, 2025

 

 

December 31, 2024

 

Fair value of LHFS

 

$

92,672

 

 

$

102,676

 

LHFS contractual principal outstanding

 

 

90,961

 

 

 

105,322

 

Fair value less unpaid principal

 

$

1,711

 

 

$

(2,646

)