XML 29 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable.

The market approach is applied for recurring fair value measurements and endeavors to utilize the best available information. Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Fair value balances are classified based on the observability of those inputs.

A fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). Level 2 measurements utilize observable inputs in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, or, quoted prices in markets that are not active.

In estimating the fair value of the financial instruments presented, we used the following methods and assumptions:

Cash and cash equivalents

For cash and cash equivalents, the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to the short-term nature of the instruments.

Restricted cash

Restricted cash is comprised of certificates of deposit that are pledged for various letters of credit/bank guarantees secured by us and escrow accounts due to acquisitions and divestitures. We deem the carrying value to be a reasonable estimate of fair value due to the nature of these instruments.

Contingent consideration

The fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated using the Monte-Carlo simulation model, which relies on significant assumption and estimates including discount rates and future market conditions, among others.

Long-term debt

The fair value of debt was estimated based on the current rates available to us for similar debt of the same remaining maturities and consideration of our default and credit risk.

Swaps

The fair values of the interest rate swap agreements were estimated based on market-value quotes received from the counterparties to the agreements.

The fair values of our financial instruments as of March 31, 2018 are presented in the following table:

 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
(in thousands)
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Fair Value
Financial Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
123,698

 
$

 
$

 
$
123,698

Restricted cash

 
8,609

 

 
8,609

Total
$
123,698

 
$
8,609

 
$

 
$
132,307

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
$

 
$

 
$
6,900

 
$
6,900

Total debt

 
1,734,043

 

 
1,734,043

Total
$

 
$
1,734,043

 
$
6,900


$
1,740,943

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset for Swaps
$

 
$
18,542

 
$

 
$
18,542

Liability for Swaps
$

 
$
1,046

 
$

 
$
1,046

The fair values of our financial instruments as of December 31, 2017 are presented in the following table:

 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
(in thousands)
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Fair Value
Financial Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
118,804

 
$

 
$

 
$
118,804

Restricted cash

 
11,065

 

 
11,065

Total
$
118,804

 
$
11,065

 
$

 
$
129,869

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
$

 
$

 
$
6,500

 
$
6,500

Total debt

 
1,780,547

 

 
1,780,547

Total
$

 
$
1,780,547

 
$
6,500

 
$
1,787,047

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset for Swaps
$

 
$
11,985

 
$

 
$
11,985



There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 securities during the three months ended March 31, 2018.

In connection with our 2017 acquisitions, we entered into contingent consideration agreements, which we originally fair valued to $6.2 million using the Monte-Carlo simulation model. See Note 12 - Acquisitions for further discussion. The contingent payment is fair-valued quarterly and changes are recorded within gain on investments and other, net in our condensed consolidated statement of operations. For the three months ended March 31, 2018 we increased the fair value of our contingent consideration by $0.4 million and recorded the loss in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.