P1YP3YP3YP3YP6Yfalse2019FY--12-31FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES INC 0000036029Large Accelerated FilerfalseNASDAQOur troubled debt restructured loans of $4,791,000 and $3,840,000, whose interest collection, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts, is doubtful are included in non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.Includes $251,000 and $827,000, respectively, of purchased credit impaired loans as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.At December 31, 2019 the Capital Conservative Buffer Basel III has been fully phased-in. 0000036029 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 2019-12-31 0000036029 2018-12-31 0000036029 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 2017-01-01 2017-12-31 0000036029 2019-04-23 2019-04-23 0000036029 2019-04-23 0000036029 2017-12-31 0000036029 2020-02-14 0000036029 2019-06-30 0000036029 2016-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CorporateDebtSecuritiesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:USStatesAndPoliticalSubdivisionsMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ResidentialMortgageBackedSecuritiesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialMortgageBackedSecuritiesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancialAssetAcquiredWithCreditDeteriorationMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:MinimumMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:MaximumMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ExercisePriceFiveMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ExercisePriceFourMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ExercisePriceOneMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ExercisePriceTwoMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ExercisePriceThreeMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:ParentCompanyMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FBCBancsharesIncorporationAndFirstBankNationalAssociationMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:DoubtfulMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ForwardMortgageBackedSecuritiesTradesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:InterestRateLockCommitmentsMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:EstimateOfFairValueFairValueDisclosureMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:InterestRateLockCommitmentsMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:InterestRateLockCommitmentsMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ConsolidatedEntitiesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member ffin:ForwardMortgageBackedSecuritiesTradesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember ffin:ForwardMortgageBackedSecuritiesTradesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:PassMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SpecialMentionMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SubstandardMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:PassMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SpecialMentionMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SubstandardMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:PassMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SpecialMentionMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SubstandardMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:PassMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SpecialMentionMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SubstandardMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:PassMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SpecialMentionMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SubstandardMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FinancingReceivables15To59DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivables60To89DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivablesEqualToGreaterThan90DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FinancingReceivables15To59DaysPastDueMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivables60To89DaysPastDueMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivablesEqualToGreaterThan90DaysPastDueMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FinancingReceivables15To59DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivables60To89DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivablesEqualToGreaterThan90DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FinancingReceivables15To59DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivables60To89DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivablesEqualToGreaterThan90DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FinancingReceivables15To59DaysPastDueMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivables60To89DaysPastDueMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivablesEqualToGreaterThan90DaysPastDueMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:USStatesAndPoliticalSubdivisionsMember stpr:TX 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:DeferredProfitSharingMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember ffin:FairValueInputsLevel1AndLevel2Member 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:EstimateOfFairValueFairValueDisclosureMember ffin:FairValueInputsLevel1AndLevel2Member 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FBCBancsharesIncorporationAndFirstBankNationalAssociationMember us-gaap:FinancialAssetAcquiredWithCreditDeteriorationMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:ParentCompanyMember srt:MinimumMember ffin:BaselThreeFullyPhasedInMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ConsolidatedEntitiesMember srt:MinimumMember ffin:BaselThreeFullyPhasedInMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:EstimateOfFairValueFairValueDisclosureMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:MeasurementInputDiscountRateMember srt:MinimumMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:MeasurementInputDiscountRateMember srt:MaximumMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:EstimateOfFairValueFairValueDisclosureMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:SubsidiaryBankMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:UnaffiliatedBanksMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member us-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:USStatesAndPoliticalSubdivisionsMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:CorporateBondSecuritiesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:ResidentialMortgageBackedSecuritiesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:CommercialMortgageBackedSecuritiesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:USStatesAndPoliticalSubdivisionsMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:CorporateBondSecuritiesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:ResidentialMortgageBackedSecuritiesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:CommercialMortgageBackedSecuritiesMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member us-gaap:CollateralizedSecuritiesOtherMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:CollateralizedSecuritiesOtherMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember us-gaap:InterestRateLockCommitmentsMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:ParentCompanyMember srt:MinimumMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember ffin:ForwardMortgageBackedSecuritiesTradesMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:BankAndTrustOfBryanCollegeStationMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialMortgageBackedSecuritiesMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:USTreasuryAndGovernmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:USStatesAndPoliticalSubdivisionsMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CorporateDebtSecuritiesMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ResidentialMortgageBackedSecuritiesMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancialAssetAcquiredWithCreditDeteriorationMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 srt:ParentCompanyMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:DoubtfulMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:InterestRateLockCommitmentsMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ForwardMortgageBackedSecuritiesTradesMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member us-gaap:EstimateOfFairValueFairValueDisclosureMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:InterestRateLockCommitmentsMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:InterestRateLockCommitmentsMember us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ConsolidatedEntitiesMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member ffin:ForwardMortgageBackedSecuritiesTradesMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ForwardMortgageBackedSecuritiesTradesMember us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 srt:MinimumMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:PassMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SpecialMentionMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SubstandardMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:PassMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SpecialMentionMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SubstandardMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:PassMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SpecialMentionMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SubstandardMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:PassMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SpecialMentionMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SubstandardMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:PassMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SpecialMentionMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:SubstandardMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FinancingReceivables15To59DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivables60To89DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivablesEqualToGreaterThan90DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FinancingReceivables15To59DaysPastDueMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivables60To89DaysPastDueMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FinancingReceivables15To59DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivables60To89DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivablesEqualToGreaterThan90DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FinancingReceivables15To59DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivables60To89DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivablesEqualToGreaterThan90DaysPastDueMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FinancingReceivables15To59DaysPastDueMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivables60To89DaysPastDueMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivablesEqualToGreaterThan90DaysPastDueMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FinancingReceivablesEqualToGreaterThan90DaysPastDueMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:USStatesAndPoliticalSubdivisionsMember stpr:TX 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:DeferredProfitSharingMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:EstimateOfFairValueFairValueDisclosureMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FairValueInputsLevel1AndLevel2Member us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:FairValueInputsLevel1AndLevel2Member us-gaap:EstimateOfFairValueFairValueDisclosureMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 srt:ParentCompanyMember srt:MinimumMember ffin:BaselThreePhasedInScheduleMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 srt:ParentCompanyMember srt:MinimumMember ffin:BaselThreeFullyPhasedInMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ConsolidatedEntitiesMember srt:MinimumMember ffin:BaselThreePhasedInScheduleMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ConsolidatedEntitiesMember srt:MinimumMember ffin:BaselThreeFullyPhasedInMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member us-gaap:EstimateOfFairValueFairValueDisclosureMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:SubsidiaryBankMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:UnaffiliatedBanksMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:USTreasuryAndGovernmentMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:USTreasuryAndGovernmentMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CorporateBondSecuritiesMember us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CorporateBondSecuritiesMember us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ResidentialMortgageBackedSecuritiesMember us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ResidentialMortgageBackedSecuritiesMember us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialMortgageBackedSecuritiesMember us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialMortgageBackedSecuritiesMember us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CollateralizedSecuritiesOtherMember us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CollateralizedSecuritiesOtherMember us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member us-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:USTreasurySecuritiesMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:USStatesAndPoliticalSubdivisionsMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:USStatesAndPoliticalSubdivisionsMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember us-gaap:InterestRateLockCommitmentsMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:EstimateOfFairValueFairValueDisclosureMember us-gaap:InterestRateLockCommitmentsMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 srt:ParentCompanyMember srt:MinimumMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:CarryingReportedAmountFairValueDisclosureMember ffin:ForwardMortgageBackedSecuritiesTradesMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:EstimateOfFairValueFairValueDisclosureMember ffin:ForwardMortgageBackedSecuritiesTradesMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ReconciliationOfFairValueOfPlanAssetsMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:ParentCompanyMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:CommercialBancsharesIncMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ReconciliationOfBenefitObligationsMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:UnusedLinesOfCreditMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommitmentsToExtendCreditMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:StandbyLettersOfCreditMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:USStatesAndPoliticalSubdivisionsMember stpr:TX ffin:SecuritiesAvailableForSaleMember us-gaap:GeographicConcentrationRiskMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ExercisePriceThreeMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ExercisePriceTwoMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ExercisePriceOneMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ExercisePriceFiveMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ExercisePriceFourMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommonStockMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ExtendedMaturityMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:CombinedRateAndMaturityMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ExtendedMaturityMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:CombinedRateAndMaturityMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ExtendedMaturityMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:CombinedRateAndMaturityMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ExtendedMaturityMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:CombinedRateAndMaturityMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:SafeHarborFourZeroOneKPlanMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:MinimumMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:MaximumMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ReconciliationOfFairValueOfPlanAssetsMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:MinimumMember us-gaap:BuildingMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:MinimumMember us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:MinimumMember us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember ffin:NonEmployeeDirectorsMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:OfficerMember us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember srt:DirectorMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:DirectorMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 srt:OfficerMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AccountingStandardsUpdate201802Member 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 srt:ParentCompanyMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ReconciliationOfBenefitObligationsMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:USStatesAndPoliticalSubdivisionsMember stpr:TX ffin:SecuritiesAvailableForSaleMember us-gaap:GeographicConcentrationRiskMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommonStockMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ExtendedMaturityMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:CombinedRateAndMaturityMember us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:CombinedRateAndMaturityMember ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ExtendedMaturityMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:CombinedRateAndMaturityMember us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:CombinedRateAndMaturityMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ExtendedMaturityMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:CombinedRateAndMaturityMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:SafeHarborFourZeroOneKPlanMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ReconciliationOfFairValueOfPlanAssetsMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 srt:MaximumMember us-gaap:BuildingMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 srt:MaximumMember us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 srt:MaximumMember us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 srt:OfficerMember us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember srt:DirectorMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 srt:DirectorMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 srt:OfficerMember 2018-01-01 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31 0000036029 srt:ParentCompanyMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommonStockMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31 0000036029 ffin:SafeHarborFourZeroOneKPlanMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31 0000036029 srt:OfficerMember us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember srt:DirectorMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31 0000036029 srt:DirectorMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31 0000036029 srt:OfficerMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember ffin:NonEmployeeDirectorsMember 2017-04-25 2017-04-25 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember ffin:NonEmployeeDirectorsMember 2018-04-24 2018-04-24 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember ffin:NonEmployeeDirectorsMember 2020-04-28 2020-04-28 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember srt:OfficerMember 2016-10-25 2016-10-25 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember srt:OfficerMember srt:MaximumMember 2017-10-24 2017-10-24 0000036029 srt:MinimumMember srt:OfficerMember us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember 2017-10-24 2017-10-24 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember srt:OfficerMember 2017-10-24 2017-10-24 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember srt:OfficerMember 2015-10-27 2015-10-27 0000036029 srt:OfficerMember us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember 2018-10-23 2018-10-23 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember srt:OfficerMember 2019-06-26 2019-06-26 0000036029 us-gaap:RestrictedStockMember srt:OfficerMember 2019-10-22 2019-10-22 0000036029 srt:MaximumMember 2017-06-25 0000036029 srt:MaximumMember 2017-09-02 0000036029 ffin:CommercialBancsharesIncAndCommercialStateBankMember 2018-01-01 0000036029 ffin:FBCBancsharesIncorporationAndFirstBankNationalAssociationMember 2017-10-12 2017-10-12 0000036029 ffin:CommercialBancsharesIncMember 2018-01-01 2018-01-01 0000036029 us-gaap:SubsequentEventMember ffin:TbAndTBancsharesIncMember 2020-01-01 0000036029 us-gaap:SubsequentEventMember ffin:TbAndTBancsharesIncMember 2020-01-01 2020-01-01 0000036029 ffin:TbAndTBancsharesIncMember 2019-12-31 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ReconciliationOfBenefitObligationsMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommonStockMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 2019-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ReconciliationOfBenefitObligationsMember 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialPortfolioSegmentMember 2017-12-31 0000036029 ffin:AgriculturalPortfolioSegmentMember 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommercialRealEstatePortfolioSegmentMember 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember 2017-12-31 0000036029 ffin:ReconciliationOfFairValueOfPlanAssetsMember 2017-12-31 0000036029 srt:ParentCompanyMember 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommonStockMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 2018-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommonStockMember 2016-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember 2016-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember 2016-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember 2016-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember 2016-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 2016-12-31 0000036029 srt:ParentCompanyMember 2016-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:CommonStockMember 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:TreasuryStockMember 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember 2017-12-31 0000036029 us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 2017-12-31 iso4217:USD xbrli:pure xbrli:shares iso4217:USD xbrli:shares ffin:Location ffin:Contract ffin:Investment ffin:SecurityLoan
Washington, D.C. 20549
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2019
For the transition period from
Commission file number
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
400 Pine Street
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of exchange
on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated file”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
of the Act).    Yes  
As of June 30, 2019, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and
common stock held by
was $
As of February 1
, 2020, there were
shares of common stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference
Certain information called for by Part III is incorporated by reference to the proxy statement for our 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2019.

ITEM 10.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 14.
ITEM 15.
ITEM 16.

This Form
contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. When used in this Form
words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “predict,” “project,” and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to our management. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited, to those listed in “Item
Factors” and the following:
  general economic conditions, including our local, state and national real estate markets and employment trends;
  effect of severe weather conditions, including hurricanes, tornadoes, flooding and droughts;
  volatility and disruption in national and international financial and commodity markets;
  government intervention in the U.S. financial system, including the effects of recent legislative, tax, accounting and regulatory actions and reforms, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the capital ratios of Basel III as adopted by the federal banking authorities and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act;
  political instability;
  the ability of the Federal government to address the national economy;
  changes in our competitive environment from other financial institutions and financial service providers;
  the effects of and changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“the Federal Reserve Board”);
  the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies, as well as the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and other accounting standard setters;
  the effect of changes in laws and regulations (including laws and regulations concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance) with which we and our subsidiaries must comply;
  changes in the demand for loans;
  fluctuations in the value of collateral securing our loan portfolio and in the level of the allowance for loan losses;
  the accuracy of our estimates of future loan losses;
  the accuracy of our estimates and assumptions regarding the performance of our securities portfolio;
  soundness of other financial institutions with which we have transactions;
  inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations;
  changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;

  changes in commodity prices (e.g., oil and gas, cattle, and wind energy);
  our ability to attract deposits and increase market share;
  changes in our liquidity position;
  changes in the reliability of our vendors, internal control system or information systems;
  cyber attacks on our technology information systems, including fraud from our customers and external third-party vendors;
  our ability to attract and retain qualified employees;
  acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses;
  the possible impairment of goodwill associated with our acquisitions;
  consequences of continued bank mergers and acquisitions in our market area, resulting in fewer but much larger and stronger competitors;
  expansion of operations, including branch openings, new product offerings and expansion into new markets;
  changes in our compensation and benefit plans; and
  acts of God or of war or terrorism.
Such forward-looking statements reflect the current views of our management with respect to future events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, growth strategy and liquidity. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this paragraph. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise (except as required by law).
First Financial Bankshares, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”), is a financial holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, or BHCA. As such, we are supervised by the Federal Reserve Board, as well as several other bank regulators. We were formed as a bank holding company in 1956 under the original name F & M Operating Company, but our banking operations date back to 1890, when Farmers and Merchants National Bank opened for business in Abilene, Texas. On January 1, 2020, we acquired TB&T Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, The Bank & Trust of Bryan/College Station, Texas and merged these entities with and into the Company and our subsidiary bank, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, our subsidiaries were:
  First Financial Bank, National Association, Abilene, Texas;
  First Technology Services, Inc., Abilene, Texas, a wholly owned subsidiary of First Financial Bank, National Association, Abilene, Texas;
  First Financial Trust & Asset Management Company, National Association, Abilene, Texas;
  First Financial Insurance Agency, Inc., Abilene, Texas; and
  First Financial Investments, Inc., Abilene, Texas.

Through our subsidiaries, we conduct a full-service commercial banking business. Our banking centers are located primarily in Central, North Central, Southeast and West Texas. As of January 1, 2020, we had 78 financial centers across Texas, with eleven locations in Abilene, three locations in Bryan and Weatherford, two locations in Cleburne, College Station, Conroe, San Angelo, Stephenville, and Granbury, and one location each in Acton, Albany, Aledo, Alvarado, Beaumont, Boyd, Bridgeport, Brock, Burleson, Cisco, Clyde, Cut and Shoot, Decatur, Eastland, El Campo, Fort Worth, Fulshear, Glen Rose, Grapevine, Hereford, Huntsville, Keller, Kingwood, Magnolia, Mauriceville, Merkel, Midlothian, Mineral Wells, Montgomery, Moran, New Waverly, Newton, Odessa, Orange, Palacios, Port Arthur, Ranger, Rising Star, Roby, Southlake, Spring, Sweetwater, Tomball, Trent, Trophy Club, Vidor, Waxahachie, Willis and Willow Park, all in Texas.
Even though we operate in a growing number of Texas markets, we continue to believe that decisions are best made at the local level. Although we consolidated our bank charters into one charter in 2012, we continue to regionally manage our operations with local advisory boards of directors, local bank region presidents and local decision-makers. We have consolidated substantially all of the backroom operations, such as investment securities, accounting, check processing, technology and employee benefits, which improved our efficiency and freed management of our bank regions to concentrate on serving the banking needs of their local communities.
In the past, we have chosen to keep our Company focused on the State of Texas, one of the nation’s largest, fastest-growing and most economically diverse states. With approximately 29.0 million residents, Texas has more people than any other state except California. The population of Texas grew 20.7% from 2008-2018 according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Many of the communities in which we operate are also experiencing positive growth as shown below:
Population Growth 2008-2018*
Bridgeport and Wise County
Fort Worth and Tarrant County
Cleburne and Johnson County
Granbury and Hood County
Weatherford, Willow Park, Aledo and Parker County
Stephenville and Erath County
Conroe and Montgomery County
Bryan/College Station
* Source: U. S. Census Bureau
These economies include dynamic centers of higher education, agriculture, wind energy and natural resources, retail, military, healthcare, tourism, retirement living, manufacturing and distribution.
We believe our community approach to doing business works best for us in small and
markets, where we can play a prominent role in the economic, civic and cultural life of the community. Our goal is to serve these communities well and to experience growth as these markets continue to expand. In many instances, banking competition is less intense in smaller markets, making it easier for us to operate rationally and attract and retain high-caliber employees who prefer not only our community-banker concept but the high quality of life in smaller cities.
Over the years, we have grown in three ways: by growing organically, by opening new branch locations and by acquiring other banks. Since 1997, we have completed thirteen bank acquisitions and have increased our total assets from $1.57 billion to $8.26 billion as of December 31, 2019. We also have a trust and asset management company and a technology services company. First Financial Trust and Asset Management Company, National Association operates as a subsidiary of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and First Technology Services, Inc. operates as a subsidiary of First Financial Bank, National Association, Abilene, Texas. Looking ahead, we intend to continue to grow organically by better serving the needs of our customers and putting them first in all of our decisions. We continually look for new branch locations, such as our newest branch in Spring, Texas which opened in January 2019, so we can provide more convenient service to our customers. We are actively pursuing acquisition opportunities by calling on banks that we are interested in possibly acquiring.
When targeting a bank for acquisition, the subject bank generally needs to be well managed and profitable, while being located in the type of community that fits our profile. We seek to enter growing communities with good amenities – schools, infrastructure, commerce and lifestyle. We prefer
markets, either around Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio or Austin or along the Interstate 35, 45, 10 and 20 corridors in Texas. We might also consider the acquisition of banks in East Texas, the Texas Hill Country area or in states contiguous to Texas. Banks between $300 million and $1.0 billion in asset size fit our “sweet spot” for acquisition, but we would consider banks that are larger or smaller, or that are in other areas of Texas if we believe they would be a good fit for our Company.

Information on our revenues, profits and losses and total assets appears in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in Item 7 hereof.
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
We provide management, technical resources and policy direction to our subsidiaries, which enable them to improve or expand their services while continuing their local activity and identity. Each of our subsidiaries operates under the
management of its own board of directors and officers, including advisory boards of directors for our bank regions. We provide resources and policy direction in, among other things, the following areas:
  asset and liability management;
  risk management;
  loan review;
  loan analysis;
  human resources;
  regulatory compliance; and
  internal audit.
In particular, we assist our subsidiaries with, among other things, decisions concerning major capital expenditures, employee fringe benefits, including retirement plans and group medical coverage, dividend policies, and appointment of officers and directors, including advisory directors, and their compensation. We also perform, through corporate staff groups or by outsourcing to third parties, internal audits, compliance oversight and loan reviews of our subsidiaries. We provide advice and specialized services for our bank regions related to lending, investing, purchasing, advertising, public relations, and technology services.
We evaluate various potential financial institution acquisition opportunities and approve potential locations for new branch offices. We anticipate that funding for any acquisitions or expansions would be provided from our existing cash balances, available dividends from our subsidiaries, utilization of available lines of credit and future debt or equity offerings.
Services Offered by Our Subsidiaries
Our subsidiary bank, First Financial Bank, National Association, Abilene, Texas is a separate legal entity that operates under the
management of its board of directors and officers. Our multiple banking regions, which operate under our subsidiary bank, each have separate advisory boards that make recommendations and provide assistance to regional management of the bank regarding the operations of their respective region. Each of

our bank regions provides general commercial banking services, which include accepting and holding checking, savings and time deposits, making loans, automated teller machines,
and night deposit services, safe deposit facilities, remote deposit capture, internet banking, mobile banking, payroll cards, transmitting funds, and performing other customary commercial banking services. We also conduct full-service trust and wealth management activities through First Financial Trust & Asset Management Company, National Association, our trust company. Our trust company has nine locations which are located in Abilene, Fort Worth, Houston, Odessa, Beaumont, San Angelo, San Antonio, Stephenville and Sweetwater, all in Texas. Through our trust company, we offer personal trust services, which include wealth management, the administration of estates, testamentary trusts, revocable and irrevocable trusts and agency accounts. We also administer all types of retirement and employee benefit accounts, which include 401(k) profit sharing plans and IRAs.
The Company has been providing trust services since 1927. 
In addition, we provide securities brokerage services through arrangements with an unrelated third party in our Abilene, San Angelo and Weatherford banking regions.
Commercial banking in Texas is highly competitive, and because we hold less than 1% of the state’s deposits, we represent only a minor segment of the industry. To succeed in this industry, we believe that we must have the capability to compete effectively in the areas of (1) interest rates paid or charged; (2) scope of services offered; and (3) prices charged for such services. Our bank regions compete in their respective service areas against highly competitive banks, thrifts, savings and loan associations, small loan companies, credit unions, mortgage companies, insurance companies, and brokerage firms, all of which are engaged in providing financial products and services and some of which are larger than us in terms of capital, resources and personnel.
Our business does not depend on any single customer or any few customers, and the loss of any one would not have a materially adverse effect upon our business. Although we have a broad base of customers that are not related to us, our customers also occasionally include our officers and directors, as well as other entities with which we are affiliated. Through our bank regions we may make loans to our officers and directors, and entities with which we are affiliated, in the ordinary course of business. We make these loans on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons. Loans to our directors, officers and their affiliates are also subject to numerous restrictions under federal and state banking laws, which we describe in greater detail below, under the heading “Supervision and Regulation – Loans to Directors, Executive Officers and Principal Shareholders.”
Including all of our subsidiaries, we employed 1,345 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2019. Our management believes that our employee relations have been and will continue to be good.
Supervision and Regulation
Both federal and state laws extensively regulate bank holding companies, financial holding companies and banks. These laws (and the regulations promulgated thereunder) are primarily intended to protect depositors and the deposit insurance fund (the “DIF”) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the FDIC. The following information describes particular laws and regulatory provisions relating to financial holding companies and banks. This discussion is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular laws and regulatory provisions. A change in any of these laws or regulations may have a material effect on our business and the business of our subsidiaries. Recent political developments, including the change in administration of the United States federal government, have added additional uncertainty in the implementation, scope and timing of regulatory reforms.
Bank Holding Companies and Financial Holding Companies
Historically, the activities of bank holding companies were limited to the business of banking and activities closely related or incidental to banking. Bank holding companies were generally prohibited from acquiring control of any company that was not a bank and from engaging in any business other than the business of banking or managing and controlling banks. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which took effect on March 12, 2000, dismantled

restrictions against affiliations between banking, securities and insurance firms by permitting bank holding companies to engage in a broader range of financial activities, so long as certain safeguards are observed. Specifically, bank holding companies may elect to become “financial holding companies” that may affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and engage in other activities that are financial in nature or incidental to a financial activity. Thus, with the enactment of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, banks, security firms and insurance companies find it easier to acquire or affiliate with each other and cross-sell financial products. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act permits a single financial services organization to offer a more complete array of financial products and services than historically was permitted.
A financial holding company is essentially a bank holding company with significantly expanded powers. Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, in addition to traditional lending activities, the following activities are among those that are deemed “financial in nature” for financial holding companies: securities underwriting, dealing in or making a market in securities, sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies, insurance underwriting and agency activities, activities which the Federal Reserve Board determines to be closely related to banking, and certain merchant banking activities.
We elected to become a financial holding company in September 2001. As a financial holding company, we have very broad discretion to affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies, provide merchant banking services, and engage in other activities that the Federal Reserve Board has deemed financial in nature. In order to continue as a financial holding company, we must continue to be well-capitalized, well-managed and maintain compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. Depending on the types of financial activities that we may elect to engage in, under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act’s functional regulation principles, we may become subject to supervision by additional government agencies. The election to be treated as a financial holding company increases our ability to offer financial products and services that historically we were either unable to provide or were only able to provide on a limited basis. As a result, we will face increased competition in the markets for any new financial products and services that we may offer. Likewise, an increased amount of consolidation among banks and securities firms or banks and insurance firms could result in a growing number of large financial institutions that could compete aggressively with us.
Mergers and Acquisitions
We generally must obtain approval from the banking regulators before we can acquire other financial institutions. We may not engage in certain acquisitions if we are undercapitalized. Furthermore, the BHCA provides that the Federal Reserve Board cannot approve any acquisition, merger or consolidation that may substantially lessen competition in the banking industry, create a monopoly in any section of the country, or be a restraint of trade. However, the Federal Reserve Board may approve such a transaction if the convenience and needs of the community clearly outweigh any anti-competitive effects. Specifically, the Federal Reserve Board would consider, among other factors, the expected benefits to the public (greater convenience, increased competition, greater efficiency, etc.) against the risks of possible adverse effects (undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest, unsound banking practices, etc.).
Under the BHCA, the Company must obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board, or acting under delegated authority, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas before (1) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of any class of voting securities of any bank or bank holding company if, after the acquisition, the Company would directly or indirectly own or control 5% or more of the class; (2) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company; or (3) merging or consolidating with another bank holding company.
The Change in Bank Control Act of 1978, as amended, or the CIBCA, and the related regulations of the Federal Reserve Board require any person or groups of persons acting in concert (except for companies required to make application under the BHCA), to file a written notice with the Federal Reserve Board before the person or group acquires control of the Company. The CIBCA defines “control” as the direct or indirect power to vote 25% or more of any class of voting securities or to direct the management or policies of a bank holding company or an insured bank. A rebuttable presumption of control arises under the CIBCA where a person or group controls 10% or more, but less than 25%, of a class of the voting stock of a company or insured bank which is a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, such as the Company, or such ownership interest is greater than the ownership interest held by any other person or group.

Federal and state laws and regulations that govern banks have the effect of, among other things, regulating the scope of business, investments, cash reserves, the purpose and nature of loans, the maximum interest rate chargeable on loans, the amount of dividends declared, and required capitalization ratios.
Banks organized as national banking associations under the National Bank Act are subject to regulation and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or OCC. Effective December 30, 2012, we consolidated our then eleven bank charters into one, that being our Abilene charter. As a result, the OCC now supervises, regulates and regularly examines the following subsidiaries:
  First Financial Bank, National Association, Abilene, Texas;
  First Financial Trust & Asset Management Company, National Association; and
  First Technology Services, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of First Financial Bank, National Association)
The OCC’s supervision and regulation of banks is primarily intended to protect the interests of depositors. The National Bank Act:
  requires each national banking association to maintain reserves against deposits;
  restricts the nature and amount of loans that may be made and the interest that may be charged; and
  restricts investments and other activities.
Deposit Insurance Coverage and Assessments
Our subsidiary bank is a member of the FDIC. Through the DIF, the FDIC provides deposit insurance protection that covers all deposit accounts in FDIC-insured depository institutions up to applicable limits (currently, $250 thousand per depositor).    
Our subsidiary bank must pay assessments to the FDIC under a risk-based assessment system for this federal deposit insurance protection. FDIC-insured depository institutions pay insurance premiums at rates based on their risk classification. Institutions assigned to higher risk classifications (i.e., institutions that pose a greater risk of loss to the DIF) pay assessments at higher rates than institutions assigned to lower risk classifications. An institution’s risk classification is assigned based on its capital levels and the level of supervisory concern the institution poses to bank regulators. Through December 31, 2019, the assessment rate for our subsidiary bank was at the lowest risk-based premium available, which was 3.00% of the assessment base per annum. In addition, the FDIC can impose special assessments to cover shortages in the DIF and has imposed special assessments in the past.
In October 2010, the FDIC adopted a new Restoration Plan for the DIF to ensure that the fund reserve ratio reaches 1.35% by September 30, 2020, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. On April 26, 2016, the FDIC adopted a rule amending pricing for deposit insurance for institutions with less than $10 billion in assets effective the quarter after the fund reserve ratio reached 1.15%. The fund reserve ratio reached 1.15% effective as of June 30, 2016. As a result, our subsidiary bank’s assessment rate was decreased to the rate stated above effective July 1, 2016. The Dodd-Frank Act also eliminated the requirement that the FDIC pay dividends to insured depository institutions when the reserve ratio exceeds certain thresholds.
The Dodd-Frank Act required the FDIC to offset the effect of increasing the reserve ratio on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion, such as the our subsidiary bank. In September 2018, the reserve ratio reached 1.36% at which time banks with assets of less than $10 billion were awarded assessment credits for their portion of their assessments that contributed to the growth in the reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35%. When the reserve ratio reached 1.40% in June 2019, the FDIC applied these credits to the September 30, 2019 assessment invoice and then again to the December 31, 2019 assessment invoice. Our subsidiary’s bank’s assessment credit totaled $1.84 million of which $522 thousand and $525 thousand, respectively, were used to zero out the September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2019 assessment invoices. As of December 31, 2019, $791 thousand remains in available credits, which our subsidiary bank expects to be applied to the March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020 assessment invoices.

As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC also revised the deposit insurance assessment system, effective April 1, 2011, to base assessments on the average total consolidated assets of insured depository institutions during the assessment period, less the average tangible equity of the institution during the assessment period, as opposed to solely bank deposits at an institution. This base assessment change necessitated that the FDIC adjust the assessment rates to ensure that the revenue collected under the new assessment system will approximately equal that under the existing assessment system.
Under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, or FIRREA, an FDIC-insured depository institution can be held liable for any losses incurred by the FDIC in connection with (1) the “default” of one of its FDIC-insured subsidiaries or (2) any assistance provided by the FDIC to one of its FDIC-receivers, and “in danger of default” is defined generally as the existence of certain conditions indicating that a default is likely to occur in the absence of regulatory assistance.
The FDIC is also empowered to regulate interest rates paid by insured banks. Approval of the FDIC is also required before an insured bank retires any part of its common or preferred stock, or any capital notes or debentures.
Payment of Dividends
We are a legal entity separate and distinct from our banking and other subsidiaries. We receive most of our revenue from dividends paid to us by our bank and trust company subsidiaries. Described below are some of the laws and regulations that apply when either we or our subsidiaries pay or paid dividends.
The Federal Reserve Board, the OCC and the FDIC have issued policy statements that recommend that bank holding companies and insured banks should generally only pay dividends to the extent net income is sufficient to cover both cash dividends and a rate of earnings retention consistent with capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. Further, the Federal Reserve Board’s policy provides that bank holding companies should not maintain a level of cash dividends that undermines the bank holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has indicated that each bank holding company should carefully review its dividend policy, and has discouraged payment ratios that are at maximum allowable levels, which is the maximum dividend amount that may be issued and allow the company to still maintain its target Tier 1 capital ratio, unless both asset quality and capital are very strong.
To pay dividends, our subsidiaries must maintain adequate capital above regulatory guidelines. Under federal law, our subsidiary bank cannot pay a dividend if, after paying the dividend, the bank would be “undercapitalized.” In addition, if the FDIC believes that a bank under its jurisdiction is engaged in, or is about to engage in, an unsafe or unsound practice (which, depending on the financial condition of the bank, could include the payment of dividends), the FDIC may require, after notice and hearing, that such bank cease and desist from the unsafe practice. The FDIC and the OCC have each indicated paying dividends that deplete a bank’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice.
National banks are required by federal law to obtain the prior approval of the OCC in order to declare and pay dividends if the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year would exceed the total of (1) such bank’s net profits (as defined and interpreted by regulation) for that year plus (2) its retained net profits (as defined and interpreted by regulation) for the preceding two calendar years, less any required transfers to surplus. In addition, these banks may only pay dividends to the extent that retained net profits (including the portion transferred to surplus) exceed bad debts (as defined by regulation).
Our subsidiaries paid aggregate dividends to us of $84.50 million in 2019 and $74.10 million in 2018. Under the dividend restrictions discussed above, as of December 31, 2019, our subsidiaries could have declared in the aggregate additional dividends of approximately $261.42 million from retained net profits, without obtaining regulatory approvals.

Federal Income Tax
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law with sweeping modifications to the Internal Revenue Code. The primary change for the Company was to lower the corporate income tax rate to 21% from 35%. The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were
based on the income tax rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21%. The provisional amount recorded related to the
of the Company’s deferred tax balance was $7.65 million, a reduction of income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2018, final regulations for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act were still pending; however, the Company updated its estimate of the impact to our deferred tax balances based on the proposed regulations issued to date and recorded an additional reduction of income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 of $664 thousand. No additional adjustment amounts were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019, and the Company does not anticipate significant revision will be necessary.
Affiliate Transactions
The Federal Reserve Act, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”) and the rules adopted under these statutes restrict the extent to which we can borrow or otherwise obtain credit from, or engage in certain other transactions with, our subsidiaries. These laws regulate “covered transactions” between insured depository institutions and their subsidiaries, on the one hand, and their
affiliates, on the other hand. The Dodd-Frank Act expanded the definition of affiliate to make any investment fund, including a mutual fund, for which a depository institution or its affiliates serve as investment advisor an affiliate of the depository institution. “Covered transactions” include a loan or extension of credit to a
affiliate, a purchase of securities issued by such an affiliate, a purchase of assets from such an affiliate (unless otherwise exempted by the Federal Reserve Board), an acceptance of securities issued by such an affiliate as collateral for a loan, and an issuance of a guarantee, acceptance, or letter of credit for the benefit of such an affiliate. The Dodd-Frank Act extended the limitations to derivative transactions, repurchase agreements and securities lending and borrowing transactions that create credit exposure to an affiliate or an insider. The “covered transactions” that an insured depository institution and its subsidiaries are permitted to engage in with their
affiliates are limited to the following amounts: (1) in the case of any one such affiliate, the aggregate amount of “covered transactions” cannot exceed ten percent of the capital stock and the surplus of the insured depository institution; and (2) in the case of all affiliates, the aggregate amount of “covered transactions” cannot exceed twenty percent of the capital stock and surplus of the insured depository institution. In addition, extensions of credit that constitute “covered transactions” must be collateralized in prescribed amounts. Further, a bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain
arrangements in connection with any extension of credit, lease or sale of property or furnishing of services. Finally, when we and our subsidiaries conduct transactions internally among us, we are required to do so at arm’s length.
Loans to Directors, Executive Officers and Principal Shareholders
The authority of our subsidiary bank to extend credit to our directors, executive officers and principal shareholders, including their immediate family members, corporations and other entities that they control, is subject to substantial restrictions and requirements under Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O promulgated thereunder, as well as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These statutes and regulations impose specific limits on the amount of loans our subsidiary bank may make to directors and other insiders, and specified approval procedures must be followed in making loans that exceed certain amounts. In addition, all loans our subsidiary bank makes to directors and other insiders must satisfy the following requirements:
  the loans must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not affiliated with us or our subsidiary bank;
  the subsidiary bank must follow credit underwriting procedures at least as stringent as those applicable to comparable transactions with persons who are not affiliated with us or our subsidiary bank; and
  the loans must not involve a greater than normal risk of
or include other features not favorable to our subsidiary bank.

Furthermore, our subsidiary bank must periodically report all loans made to directors and other insiders to the bank regulators, and these loans are closely scrutinized by the regulators for compliance with Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O. Each loan to directors or other insiders must be
by the bank’s board of directors with the interested director abstaining from voting.
We and our bank subsidiary are each required to comply with applicable capital adequacy standards established by the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC, respectively. The current risk-based capital standards applicable to us and our bank subsidiary, parts of which are currently in the process of being
are based on the December 2010 final capital framework for strengthening international capital standards, known as Basel III, of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”).    
In July 2013, the federal bank regulators approved final rules (the “Basel III Rules”) implementing the Basel III framework as well as certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Basel III Rules substantially revised the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries. The Basel III Rules became effective for us and our subsidiary bank on January 1, 2015 (subject to a
period for certain provisions).
The Basel III Rules established three components of regulatory capital: (1) common equity tier 1 capital (“CET1”), (2) additional tier 1 capital, and (3) tier 2 capital. Tier 1 capital is the sum of CET1 and additional tier 1 capital instruments meeting certain revised requirements. Total capital is the sum of tier 1 capital and tier 2 capital. Under the Basel III Rules, for most banking organizations, the most common form of additional tier 1 capital is
perpetual preferred stock and the most common form of tier 2 capital is subordinated notes and a portion of the allocation for loan and lease losses, in each case, subject to the Basel III Rules’ specific requirements. As of December 31, 2019, we do not have any
perpetual preferred stock or subordinated notes. CET1, tier 1 capital, and total capital serve as the numerators for three prescribed regulatory capital ratios. Risk-weighted assets, calculated using the standardized approach in the Basel III Rules for us and our subsidiary bank, provide the denominator for such ratios. There is also a leverage ratio that compares tier 1 capital to average total assets.
Pursuant to the Basel III Rules, the effects of certain accumulated other comprehensive income or loss (“AOCI”) items are not excluded; however,
approaches banking organizations,” including us and our subsidiary bank, could make a
permanent election to continue to exclude these items. The Company made its
permanent election to continue to exclude AOCI from capital in its filing with the Federal Reserve Board for the quarter ended March 31, 2015. If the Company would not have made this election, unrealized gains and losses would have been included in the calculation of its regulatory capital. The Basel III Rules also preclude certain hybrid securities, such as trust preferred securities issued prior to May 19, 2010, from inclusion in our tier 1 capital, subject to grandfathering in the case of companies, such as us, that had less than $15 billion in total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2009.
Under the Basel III Rules, the minimum capital ratios effective as of January 1, 2015 are:
  4.5% CET1 to risk-weighted assets;
  6.0% tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets;
  8.0% total capital to risk-weighted assets; and
  4.0% tier 1 capital to average consolidated assets as reported on consolidated financial statements (known as the “leverage ratio”).
The Basel III Rules established a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% above the new regulatory minimum risk-based capital requirements. The conservation buffer, when added to the capital requirements, resulted in the following minimum ratios: (i) a CET1 risk-based capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.5%, and (iii) a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.5%. The new capital conservation buffer requirement began being phased in beginning in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and increased by that amount each year until fully implemented in January 2019. At December 31, 2019, the required capital conservation buffer was 2.5%. An institution is subject to limitations on certain activities including payment of dividends, share repurchases and discretionary bonuses to executive officers if its capital level is below the buffer amount.     

The Basel III Rules prescribed a standardized approach for risk weightings that expanded the risk-weighting categories from the general risk-based capital rules to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets, generally ranging from 0% for U.S. government and agency securities, to 600% for certain equity exposures, and resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories.
With respect to our bank subsidiary, the Basel III Rules also revised the “prompt corrective action” regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as discussed below under “Prompt Corrective Action.”
As of December 31, 2019, we had a total risk-based capital ratio of 21.13%, a tier 1 capital to risk-weighted asset ratio of 20.06%, a CET1 to risk-weighted assets ratio of 20.06% and a leverage ratio of 12.60%. These regulatory capital ratios were calculated under the Basel III Rules.
In November 2019, the federal banking regulators published final rules implementing a simplified measure of capital adequacy for certain banking organizations that have less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets. Under the final rules, which went into effect on January 1, 2020, depository institutions and depository institution holding companies that have less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets and meet other qualifying criteria, including a leverage ratio of greater than 9%,
exposures of 25% or less of total consolidated assets and trading assets plus trading liabilities of 5% or less of total consolidated assets, are deemed “qualifying community banking organizations” and are eligible to opt into the “community bank leverage ratio framework.” A qualifying community banking organization that elects to use the community bank leverage ratio framework and that maintains a leverage ratio of greater than 9% is considered to have satisfied the generally applicable risk-based and leverage capital requirements under the Basel III Rules and, if applicable, is considered to have met the “well capitalized” ratio requirements for purposes of its primary federal regulator’s prompt corrective action rules, discussed below. The final rules include a
grace period during which a qualifying community banking organization that temporarily fails to meet any of the qualifying criteria, including the greater-
leverage capital ratio requirement, is generally still deemed “well capitalized” so long as the banking organization maintains a leverage capital ratio greater than 8%. A banking organization that fails to maintain a leverage capital ratio greater than 8% is not permitted to use the grace period and must comply with the generally applicable requirements under the Basel III Rules and file the appropriate regulatory reports. The Company and our subsidiary bank do not have any immediate plans to elect to use the community bank leverage ratio framework but may make such an election in the future.
Prompt Corrective Action.
A banking organization’s capital plays an important role in connection with regulatory enforcement as well. Federal law provides the federal banking regulators with broad power to take prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized institutions. The extent of the regulators’ powers depends on whether the institution in question is “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized,” in each case as defined by regulation. Depending upon the capital category to which an institution is assigned, the regulators’ corrective powers include: (i) requiring the institution to submit a capital restoration plan; (ii) limiting the institution’s asset growth and restricting its activities; (iii) requiring the institution to issue additional capital stock (including additional voting stock) or to be acquired; (iv) restricting transactions between the institution and its affiliates; (v) restricting the interest rate that the institution may pay on deposits; (vi) ordering a new election of directors of the institution; (vii) requiring that senior executive officers or directors be dismissed; (viii) prohibiting the institution from accepting deposits from correspondent banks; (ix) requiring the institution to divest certain subsidiaries; (x) prohibiting the payment of principal or interest on subordinated debt; and (xi) ultimately, appointing a receiver for the institution.
Under current regulations, our subsidiary bank was “well capitalized” as of December 31, 2019.
Our Support of Our Subsidiaries
Under Federal Reserve Board policy, we are expected to commit resources to act as a source of strength to support each of our subsidiaries. The Dodd-Frank Act codified this policy as a statutory requirement. This support may be required at times when, absent such Federal Reserve Board policy, we would not otherwise be required to provide it. In addition, any loans we make to our subsidiaries would be subordinate in right of payment to deposits

and to other indebtedness of our subsidiaries. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and be subject to a priority of payment.
Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, in the event of a loss suffered or anticipated by the FDIC (either as a result of the default of a banking subsidiary or related to FDIC assistance provided to a subsidiary in danger of default) our other subsidiaries may be assessed for the FDIC’s loss.
Safe and Sound Banking Practices.
Bank holding companies are not permitted to engage in unsafe and unsound banking practices. The Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation Y, for example, generally requires a holding company to give the Federal Reserve Board prior notice of any redemption or repurchase of its own equity securities, if the consideration to be paid, together with the consideration paid for any repurchases or redemptions in the preceding year, is equal to 10% or more of the bank holding company’s consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve Board may oppose the transaction if it believes that the transaction would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law or regulation. Depending upon the circumstances, the Federal Reserve Board could take the position that paying a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice.
The Federal Reserve Board has broad authority to prohibit activities of bank holding companies and their nonbanking subsidiaries which represent unsafe and unsound banking practices or which constitute violations of laws or regulations, and can assess civil money penalties for certain activities conducted on a knowing and reckless basis, if those activities caused a substantial loss to a depository institution. The penalties can be as high as $1.0 million for each day the activity continues.
Interstate Banking and Branching
Effective June 1, 1997, the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 amended the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and certain other statutes to permit state and national banks with different home states to merge across state lines, with approval of the appropriate federal banking agency, unless the home state of a participating bank had passed legislation prior to May 31, 1997 expressly prohibiting interstate mergers. Under the Riegle-Neal Act amendments, once a state or national bank has established branches in a state, that bank may establish and acquire additional branches at any location in the state at which any bank involved in the interstate merger transaction could have established or acquired branches under applicable federal or state law. If a state opted out of interstate branching within the specified time period, no bank in any other state may establish a branch in the state which has opted out, whether through an acquisition or de novo.
However, under the Dodd-Frank Act, the national branching requirements have been relaxed and national banks and state banks are able to establish branches in any state if that state would permit the establishment of the branch by a state bank chartered in that state.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Act, or FDIA, requires that the FDIC review (1) any merger or consolidation by or with an insured bank, or (2) any establishment of branches by an insured bank. Additionally, the Texas Department of Banking accepts applications for interstate merger and branching transactions, subject to certain limitations on ages of the banks to be acquired and the total amount of deposits within the state a bank or financial holding company may control. Since our primary service area is Texas, we do not expect that the ability to operate in other states will have any material impact on our growth strategy. We may, however, face increased competition from
banks that branch or make acquisitions in our primary markets in Texas.
Community Reinvestment Act of 1977
The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, or CRA, subjects a bank to regulatory assessment to determine if the institution meets the credit needs of its entire community, including
and moderate-income neighborhoods served by the bank, and to take that determination into account in its evaluation of any application made by such bank for, among other things, approval of the acquisition or establishment of a branch or other depository facility, an office relocation, a merger, or the acquisition of shares of capital stock of another financial institution. The regulatory authority prepares a written evaluation of an institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of its entire

community and assigns a rating. These ratings are “Outstanding,” “Satisfactory,” “Needs Improvement” and “Substantial
Institutions with ratings lower than “Satisfactory” may be restricted from engaging in the aforementioned activities. We believe our subsidiary bank has taken and takes significant actions to comply with the CRA, and our subsidiary bank received a “Satisfactory” rating in its most recent review by federal regulators with respect to its compliance with the CRA.
Monitoring and Reporting Suspicious Activity
Under the Bank Secrecy Act, or BSA, we are required to monitor and report unusual or suspicious account activity that might signify money laundering, tax evasion or other criminal activities, as well as transactions involving the transfer or withdrawal of amounts in excess of prescribed limits. The BSA is sometimes referred to as an “anti-money laundering” law (“AML”). Several AML acts, including provisions in Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, have been enacted up to the present to amend the BSA. Under the USA PATRIOT Act, financial institutions are subject to prohibitions against specified financial transactions and account relationships as well as enhanced due diligence and “know your customer” standards in their dealings with financial institutions and foreign customers. For example, the enhanced due diligence policies, procedures and controls generally require financial institutions to take reasonable steps:
  to conduct enhanced scrutiny of account relationships to guard against money laundering and report any suspicious transaction;
  to ascertain the identity of the nominal and beneficial owners of, and the source of funds deposited into, each account as needed to guard against money laundering and report any suspicious transactions;
  to ascertain for any foreign bank, the shares of which are not publicly traded, the identity of the owners of the foreign bank, and the nature and extent of the ownership interest of each such owner; and
  to ascertain whether any foreign bank provides correspondent accounts to other foreign banks and, if so, the identity of those foreign banks and related due diligence information.
Under the USA PATRIOT Act, financial institutions are also required to establish anti-money laundering programs. The USA PATRIOT Act sets forth minimum standards for these programs, including:
  the development of internal policies, procedures, and controls;
  the designation of a compliance officer;
  an ongoing employee training program; and
  an independent audit function to test the programs.
In addition, under the USA PATRIOT Act, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, or Treasury, has adopted rules addressing a number of related issues, including increasing the cooperation and information sharing between financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement authorities regarding individuals, entities and organizations engaged in, or reasonably suspected based on credible evidence of engaging in, terrorist acts or money laundering activities. Any financial institution complying with these rules will not be deemed to violate the privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that are discussed below. Finally, under the regulations of the Office of Foreign Asset Control, or OFAC, we are required to monitor and block transactions with certain “specially designated nationals” who OFAC has determined pose a risk to U.S. national security.
Incentive Compensation
In June 2010, the Federal Reserve Board, OCC and FDIC issued comprehensive final guidance on incentive compensation policies intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of banking organizations do not undermine the safety and soundness of such organizations by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The guidance,

which covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of an organization, either individually or as part of a group, is based upon the key principles that a banking organization’s incentive compensation arrangements should (i) provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the organization’s ability to effectively identify and manage risks, (ii) be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and (iii) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the organization’s board of directors.
The Federal Reserve Board will review, as part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of banking organizations, such as the Company, that are not “large, complex banking organizations.” These reviews will be tailored to each organization based on the scope and complexity of the organization’s activities and the prevalence of incentive compensation arrangements. The findings of the supervisory initiatives will be included in reports of examination. Deficiencies will be incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the organization’s ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a banking organization if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-management control or governance processes, pose a risk to the organization’s safety and soundness and the organization is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies.
In addition, Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act required certain regulators (including the FDIC, SEC and Federal Reserve Board) to adopt requirements or guidelines prohibiting excessive compensation. In June 2016, the Federal Reserve, jointly with five other federal regulators, published a proposed rule in response to Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires implementation of regulations or guidelines to: (1) prohibit incentive-based payment arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks by certain financial institutions by providing excessive compensation or that could lead to material financial loss, and (2) require those financial institutions to disclose information concerning incentive-based compensation arrangements to the appropriate federal regulator.
The proposed rule identifies three categories of institutions that would be covered by these regulations based on average total consolidated assets, applying less prescriptive incentive-based compensation program requirements to the smallest covered institutions (Level 3) and progressively more rigorous requirements to the larger covered institutions (Level 1). Under the proposed rule, we would fall into the smallest category (Level 3), which applies to financial institutions with average total consolidated assets greater than $1.0 billion and less than $50 billion. The proposed rules would establish general qualitative requirements applicable to all covered entities, which would include (i) prohibiting incentive arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks by providing excessive compensation; (ii) prohibiting incentive arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks that could lead to a material financial loss; (iii) establishing requirements for performance measures to appropriately balance risk and reward; (iv) requiring board of director oversight of incentive arrangements; and (v) mandating appropriate recordkeeping. Under the proposed rule, larger financial institutions with total consolidated assets of at least $50 billion would also be subject to additional requirements applicable to such institutions’ “senior executive officers” and “significant risk-takers.” These additional requirements would not be applicable to us because we currently have less than $50 billion in total consolidated assets. Comments on the proposed rule were due by July 22, 2016. As of the date of this document, the final rule has not yet been published by these regulators.
In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act requires publicly traded companies to give stockholders a
vote on executive compensation at their first annual meeting taking place six months after the date of enactment and at least every three years thereafter and on
“golden parachute” payments in connection with approvals of mergers and acquisitions unless previously voted on by shareholders. The legislation also authorizes the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own candidates using a company’s proxy materials. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act directs the federal banking regulators to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to executives of depository institutions and their holding companies with assets in excess of $1.0 billion, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded or not. The Dodd-Frank Act gives the SEC authority to prohibit broker discretionary voting on elections of directors and executive compensation matters.

Consumer Laws and Regulations
We are also subject to certain consumer laws and regulations that are designed to protect consumers in transactions with banks. While the following list is not exhaustive, these laws and regulations include the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Fair Housing Act, among others. These laws and regulations, among other things, prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, gender or other designated characteristics and mandate various disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits or making loans to such customers. These and other laws also limit finance charges or other fees or charges earned in our activities. We must comply with the applicable provisions of these consumer protection laws and regulations as part of our ongoing customer relations.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
The Dodd-Frank Act created a new, independent federal agency called the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which is granted broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement powers under various federal consumer financial protection laws, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Truth in Lending Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Debt Collection Act, the Consumer Financial Privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and certain other statutes. The CFPB has examination and primary enforcement authority with respect to depository institutions with $10 billion or more in assets. Smaller institutions are subject to rules promulgated by the CFPB but continue to be examined and supervised by federal banking regulators for consumer compliance purposes. The CFPB has authority to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive practices in connection with the offering of consumer financial products. The Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt consumer protection laws and standards that are more stringent than those adopted at the federal level and, in certain circumstances, permits the state attorney general to enforce compliance with both the state and federal laws and regulations.
The CFPB has finalized rules relating to, among other things, remittance transfers under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, which requires companies to provide consumers with certain disclosures before the consumer pays for a remittance transfer. These rules became effective in October 2013. The CFPB has also amended certain rules under Regulation C relating to home mortgage disclosure to reflect a change in the
exemption threshold for depository institutions based on the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers. In addition, on January 10, 2013, the CFPB released its final
Mortgage” rules, which amended the Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z). Regulation Z prohibits a creditor from making a higher-priced mortgage loan without regard to the consumer’s ability to repay the loan. The final amended rule implemented sections 1411 and 1412 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which generally require creditors to make a reasonable, good faith determination of a consumer’s ability to repay any consumer credit transaction secured by a dwelling (excluding an
credit plan, timeshare plan, reverse mortgage, or temporary loan) and establishes certain protections from liability under this requirement for “qualified mortgages.” The final rule also implemented section 1414 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which limits prepayment penalties. Finally, the final rule requires creditors to retain evidence of compliance with the rule for three years after a covered loan is consummated. This rule became effective January 10, 2014.
Technology Risk Management and Consumer Privacy
State and federal banking regulators have issued various policy statements emphasizing the importance of technology risk management and supervision in evaluating the safety and soundness of depository institutions with respect to banks that contract with outside vendors to provide data processing and core banking functions. The use of technology-related products, services, delivery channels and processes exposes a bank to various risks, particularly operational, privacy, security, strategic, reputation and compliance risk. Banks are generally expected to prudently manage technology-related risks as part of their comprehensive risk management policies by identifying, measuring, monitoring and controlling risks associated with the use of technology.
Under Section 501 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the federal banking agencies have established appropriate standards for financial institutions regarding the implementation of safeguards to ensure the security and

confidentiality of customer records and information, protection against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such records and protection against unauthorized access to or use of such records or information in a way that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to a customer. Among other matters, the rules require each bank to implement a comprehensive written information security program that includes administrative, technical and physical safeguards relating to customer information.
Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, a financial institution must also provide its customers with a notice of privacy policies and practices. Section 502 prohibits a financial institution from disclosing nonpublic personal information about a customer to nonaffiliated third parties unless the institution satisfies various notice and
requirements and the customer has not elected to opt out of the disclosure. Under Section 504, the agencies are authorized to issue regulations as necessary to implement notice requirements and restrictions on a financial institution’s ability to disclose nonpublic personal information about customers to nonaffiliated third parties. Under the final rule the regulators adopted, all banks must develop initial and annual privacy notices which describe in general terms the bank’s information sharing practices. Banks that share nonpublic personal information about customers with nonaffiliated third parties must also provide customers with an
notice and a reasonable period of time for the customer to opt out of any such disclosure (with certain exceptions). Limitations are placed on the extent to which a bank can disclose an account number or access code for credit card, deposit or transaction accounts to any nonaffiliated third party for use in marketing.
Concentrated Commercial Real Estate Lending Regulations
The federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, have promulgated guidance governing financial institutions with concentrations in commercial real estate lending. The guidance provides that a bank has a concentration in commercial real estate lending if (i) total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land represent 100% or more of total capital or (ii) total reported loans secured by multifamily and
residential properties and loans for construction, land development, and other land represent 300% or more of total capital and the bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months. Owner occupied loans are excluded from this second category. If a concentration is present, management must employ heightened risk management practices that address the following key elements: including board and management oversight and strategic planning, portfolio management, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing, and maintenance of increased capital levels as needed to support the level of commercial real estate lending.
Banking regulatory agencies have increasingly used a general consumer protection statute to address “unethical” or otherwise “bad” business practices that may not necessarily fall directly under the purview of a specific banking or consumer finance law. The law of choice for enforcement against such business practices has been Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to as the FTC Act, which is the primary federal law that prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices, referred to as UDAP, and unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce. “Unjustified consumer injury” is the principal focus of the FTC Act. Prior to the Dodd-Frank Act, there was little formal guidance to provide insight to the parameters for compliance with UDAP laws and regulations. However, UDAP laws and regulations have been expanded under the Dodd-Frank Act to apply to “unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices,” referred to as UDAAP, which have been delegated to the CFPB for supervision. The CFPB has published its first Supervision and Examination Manual that addresses compliance with and the examination of UDAAP.
Monetary Policy
Banks are affected by the credit policies of monetary authorities, including the Federal Reserve Board, that affect the national supply of credit. The Federal Reserve Board regulates the supply of credit in order to influence general economic conditions, primarily through open market operations in United States government obligations, varying the discount rate on financial institution borrowings, varying reserve requirements against financial institution deposits, and restricting certain borrowings by financial institutions and their subsidiaries. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board have had a significant effect on the operating results of banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future.

Enforcement Powers of Federal Banking Agencies
The Federal Reserve Board and other state and federal banking agencies and regulators have broad enforcement powers, including the power to terminate deposit insurance, issue
orders, impose substantial fines and other civil and criminal penalties and appoint a conservator or receiver. Our failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and other regulatory pronouncements could subject us, as well as our officers and directors, to administrative sanctions and potentially substantial civil penalties.
Regulatory Reform and Legislation
From time to time, various legislative and regulatory initiatives are introduced in Congress and state legislatures, as well as by regulatory agencies. Such initiatives may include proposals to expand or contract the powers of bank holding companies and depository institutions or proposals to substantially change the financial institution regulatory system. Such legislation could change banking statutes and the operating environment of the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. If enacted, such legislation could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions, and other financial institutions. The Company cannot predict whether any such legislation will be enacted, and, if enacted, the effect that it, or any implementing regulations, would have on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to the Company or our subsidiaries could have a material effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
The Dodd-Frank Act, which was enacted in July 2010, effected a fundamental restructuring of federal banking regulation. In addition to those provisions discussed above, among the Dodd-Frank Act provisions that have affected us are the following:
  creation of a new Financial Stability Oversight Council to identify systemic risks in the financial system and gives federal regulators new authority to take control of and liquidate financial firms;
  elimination of the federal statutory prohibition against the payment of interest on business checking accounts;
  prohibition on state-chartered banks engaging in derivatives transactions unless the loans to one borrower of the state in which the bank is chartered takes into consideration credit exposure to derivative transactions. For this purpose, derivative transactions include any contract, agreement, swap, warrant, note or option that is based in whole or in part on the value of, any interest in, or any quantitative measure or the occurrence of any event relating to, one or more commodity securities, currencies, interest or other rates, indices or other assets;
  requirement that the amount of any interchange fee charged by a debit card issuer with respect to a debit card transaction must be reasonable and proportional to the cost incurred by the issuer. On June 29, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board set the interchange rate cap at $0.21 per transaction and 5 basis points multiplied by the value of the transaction. While the restrictions on interchange fees do not apply to banks that, together with their affiliates, have assets of less than $10 billion, the rule could affect the competitiveness of debit cards issued by smaller banks; and
  restrictions under the Volcker Rule of the Company’s ability to engage in proprietary trading and to invest in, sponsor and engage in certain types of transactions with certain private funds. The Company had until July 15, 2015 to fully conform to the Volcker Rules restrictions.
Many of the Dodd-Frank Act’s provisions are still subject to the final rulemaking by federal banking agencies, and the implication of the Dodd-Frank Act for the Company’s business will depend to a large extent on how such rules are adopted and implemented. The Company’s management continues to review actively the provisions of the Dodd–Frank Act and assess its probable impact on its business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Available Information
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at
. You may obtain copies of our filings on the SEC website. Our website is
. You may also obtain copies of our annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and certain other information filed with the SEC, as well as amendments thereto, free of charge from our website. These documents are posted to our web site after we have filed them with the SEC. Our corporate governance guidelines, including our code of conduct applicable to all our employees, officers and directors, as well as the charters of our audit and nominating committees, are available at
. The foregoing information is also available in print to any shareholder who requests it. Except as explicitly provided, information on any web site is not incorporated into this Form
or our other securities filings and is not a part of them.
Our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows can be impacted by a number of factors, including but not limited to those set forth below, any one of which could cause our actual results to vary materially from recent results or from our anticipated future results and other forward-looking statements that we make from time to time in our news releases, annual reports and other written communications, as well as oral forward-looking statements, and other statements made from time to time by our representatives.
Our business faces unpredictable economic conditions, which could have an adverse effect on us.
General economic conditions impact the banking industry. The credit quality of our loan portfolio necessarily reflects, among other things, the general economic conditions in the areas in which we conduct our business. Our continued financial success depends somewhat on factors beyond our control, including:
  general economic conditions, including national and local real estate markets and the price of oil and gas, wind farm subsidies from the federal government and other commodity prices;
  the supply of and demand for investable funds;
  demand for loans and access to credit;
  interest rates; and
  federal, state and local laws affecting these matters.
Any substantial deterioration in any of the foregoing conditions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, which would likely adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Our business is concentrated in Texas and a downturn in the economy of Texas may adversely affect our business.
Our network of bank regions is concentrated in Texas, primarily in the Central, North Central, Southeast and Western regions of the state. Most of our customers and revenue are derived from these areas. These economies include dynamic centers of higher education, agriculture, energy and natural resources, retail, military, healthcare, tourism, retirement living, manufacturing and distribution. Because we generally do not derive revenue or customers from other parts of the state or nation, our business and operations are dependent on economic conditions in our Texas markets. Any significant decline in one or more segments of the local economies could adversely affect our business, revenue, operations and properties.
The volatility in oil and gas prices results in uncertainty about the Texas economy. While we consider our exposure to credits related to the oil and gas industry to not be significant, at approximately 2.84% of total loans as of December 31, 2019, should the price of oil and gas decline further and/or remain at low prices for an extended period, the general economic conditions in our Texas markets could be negatively affected, which could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our Company lends primarily to small to
businesses that may have fewer resources to weather a downturn in the economy, which could adversely impact the Company’s operating results.
The Company makes loans to privately-owned businesses, many of which are considered to be small to
businesses. Small to
businesses frequently have smaller market share than their competition, may be more vulnerable to economic downturns, often need additional capital to expand or compete and may experience more volatility in operating results. Any one or more of these factors may impair the borrower’s ability to repay a loan. In addition, the success of a small to
businesses often depends on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons, and the death, disability or resignation of one or more of these persons could have adverse impact on the business and its ability to repay our loans. Economic downturns, a sustained decline in commodity prices and other events that could negatively impact the businesses could cause the Company to incur credit losses that could negatively affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
In our business, we must effectively manage our credit risk.
As a lender, we are exposed to the risk that our loan customers may not repay their loans according to the terms of these loans and the collateral securing the payment of these loans may be inadequately documented or may be insufficient to fully compensate us for the outstanding balance of the loan plus the costs to dispose of the collateral. We may experience significant loan losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. Management makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the diversification by industry of our commercial loan portfolio, the amount of nonperforming loans and related collateral, the volume, growth and composition of our loan portfolio, the effects on the loan portfolio of current economic indicators and their probable impact on borrowers and the evaluation of our loan portfolio through our internal loan review process and other relevant factors.
We maintain an allowance for credit losses, which is an allowance established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense that represents management’s best estimate of probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio. Additional credit losses will likely occur in the future and may occur at a rate greater than we have experienced to date. In determining the amount of the allowance, we rely on an analysis of our loan portfolio, our experience and our evaluation of general economic conditions. If our assumptions prove to be incorrect, our current allowance may not be sufficient and adjustments may be necessary to allow for different economic conditions or adverse developments in our loan portfolio. Material additions to the allowance could materially decrease our net income.
In addition, banking regulators periodically review our allowance for credit losses and may require us to increase our provision for credit losses or recognize further charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of our management. Any increase in our allowance for credit losses or charge-offs as required by these regulatory agencies could have a material negative effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Hurricanes, extended drought conditions, severe weather and natural disasters could significantly impact the Company’s business.
Hurricanes, extended drought conditions, severe weather and natural disasters and other adverse external events could have a significant impact on the Company’s ability to conduct business. In 2017, Houston and the surrounding area around the Gulf Coast were significantly affected by Hurricane Harvey. Our Southeast Texas and Conroe regions of the Company are in these areas and were impacted by the severe winds and floods. Such events affect the stability of the Company’s deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of the collateral securing our loans, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue and/or cause the Company to incur additional expenses. The occurrence of any such event in the future could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, which in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and result of operations.

The value of real estate collateral may fluctuate significantly resulting in an under-collateralized loan portfolio.
The market value of real estate, particularly real estate held for investment, can fluctuate significantly in a short period of time as a result of market conditions in the geographic area in which the real estate is located. If the value of the real estate serving as collateral for our loan portfolio were to decline materially, a significant part of our loan portfolio could become under-collateralized. If the loans that are collateralized by real estate become troubled during a time when market conditions are declining or have declined, then, in the event of foreclosure, we may not be able to realize the amount of collateral that we anticipated at the time of originating the loan. This could have a material adverse effect on our provision for loan losses and our operating results and financial condition.
New lines of business or new products and services may subject the Company to additional risks.
From time to time, the Company may implement new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed. In developing and marketing new lines of business and/or products and services, the Company may invest significant time and resources. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service. If we are unable to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and result of operations.
We are subject to environmental liability risk associated with lending activities.
A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, we may foreclose on and take title to properties securing certain loans. In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous or toxic substances are found, we may be liable for remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws may require us to incur substantial expenses and may materially reduce the affected property’s value or limit our ability to use or sell the affected property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase our exposure to environmental liability. Environmental reviews of real property before initiating foreclosure actions may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties.
In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions, we must rely on information furnished by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements, credit reports and other financial information. We also rely on representations of those customers, counterparties or other third parties, such as independent auditors, as to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Reliance on inaccurate or misleading financial statements, credit reports or other financial information could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We do business with other financial institutions that could experience financial difficulty.
We do business through the purchase and sale of Federal funds, check clearing and through the purchase and sale of loan participations with other financial institutions. Because these financial institutions have many risks, as do we, we could be adversely affected should one of these financial institutions experience significant financial difficulties or fail to comply with our agreements with them.
If we are unable to continue to originate residential real estate loans and sell them into the secondary market for a profit, our earnings could decrease.
We derive a portion of our noninterest income from the origination of residential real estate loans and the subsequent sale of such loans into the secondary market. If we are unable to continue to originate and sell residential real estate loans at historical or greater levels, our residential real estate loan volume would decrease,

which could decrease our earnings. A rising interest rate environment, general economic conditions or other factors beyond our control could adversely affect our ability to originate residential real estate loans. We also are experiencing an increase in regulations and compliance requirements related to mortgage loan originations necessitating technology upgrades and other changes. If new regulations continue to increase and we are unable to make technology upgrades, our ability to originate mortgage loans will be reduced or eliminated. Additionally, we sell a large portion of our residential real estate loans to third party investors, and rising interest rates could negatively affect our ability to generate suitable profits on the sale of such loans. If interest rates increase after we originate the loans, our ability to market those loans is impaired as the profitability on the loans decreases. These fluctuations can have an adverse effect on the revenue we generate from residential real estate loans and in certain instances, could result in a loss on the sale of the loans.
Further, for the mortgage loans we sell in the secondary market, the mortgage loan sales contracts contain indemnification clauses should the loans default, generally in the first sixty to ninety days, or if documentation is determined not to be in compliance with regulations. While the Company’s historic losses as a result of these indemnities have been insignificant, we could be required to repurchase the mortgage loans or reimburse the purchaser of our loans for losses incurred. Both of these situations could have an adverse effect on the profitability of our mortgage loan activities and negatively impact our net income.
Difficult or changes in market conditions could adversely affect the financial services industry.
The financial markets have experienced volatility over the past several years. In some cases, the financial markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain companies without regard to those companies’ underlying financial strength. If financial market volatility worsens, or there are disruptions in these financial markets, including disruptions to the United States banking systems, there can be no assurance that we will not experience an adverse effect on our ability to access capital and our business, financial condition and result of operations could be adversely impacted.
We may need to raise additional capital and such funds may not be available when needed
We may need to raise additional capital in the future to provide us with sufficient capital resources to meet our commitments and business needs, particularly if our asset quality or earnings were to deteriorate significantly. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on, among other things, conditions in the capital and financial markets at that time, which are outside of our control, and our financial performance. Economic conditions and the loss of confidence in financial institutions may increase our cost of funding and limit access to certain customary sources of capital, other financial institution borrowings and borrowings from the discount window of the Federal Reserve. Any occurrence that may limit our access to the capital markets, such as a decline in the confidence of other financial institutions, or counterparties participating in the capital markets, may adversely affect our costs and our ability to raise capital. An inability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms when needed could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We may be subject to more stringent capital and liquidity requirements which would adversely affect our net income and future growth.
The Federal Reserve Board adopted a final rule that implemented the Basel III changes to the international regulatory capital framework and revised the U.S. risk-based and leverage capital requirements for U.S. banking organizations to strengthen identified areas of weakness in capital rules and to address relevant provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The final rule established a stricter regulatory capital framework that requires banking organizations to hold more and higher-quality capital to act as a financial cushion to absorb losses and help banking organizations better withstand periods of financial stress. The final rule increased capital ratios for all banking organizations and introduced a “capital conservation buffer” which is in addition to each capital ratio. If a banking organization dips into its capital conservation buffer, it may be restricted in its ability to pay dividends and discretionary bonus payments to its executive officers. The final rule assigned a higher risk weight to loans that are more than 90 days past due or are on nonaccrual status and to certain commercial real estate facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property. The final rule also required unrealized gains and losses on certain

securities holdings to be included for purposes of calculating regulatory capital requirements unless a
is exercised. We exercised this
right in our March 31, 2015 quarterly financial filing. The final rule also included changes in what constitutes regulatory capital. In addition, Tier 2 capital is no longer limited to the amount of Tier 1 capital included in total capital. Mortgage servicing rights, certain deferred tax assets and investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries over designated percentages of common stock are required to be deducted from capital. The final rule became effective for us on January 1, 2015. As of December 31, 2019, we met all of these new requirements, including the full capital conservation buffer.
Although we currently cannot predict the specific impact and long-term effects that Basel III will have on our Company and the banking industry more generally, the Company may be required to maintain higher regulatory capital levels which could impact our operations, net income and ability to grow. Furthermore, the Company’s failure to comply with the minimum capital requirements could result in our regulators taking formal or informal actions against us which could restrict our future growth or operations.
The trust wealth management fees we receive may decrease as a result of poor investment performance, in either relative or absolute terms, which could decrease our revenues and net earnings.
Our trust company subsidiary derives its revenues primarily from investment management fees based on assets under management. Our ability to maintain or increase assets under management is subject to a number of factors, including investors’ perception of our past performance, in either relative or absolute terms, market and economic conditions, including changes in oil and gas prices, and competition from investment management companies. Financial markets are affected by many factors, all of which are beyond our control, including general economic conditions, including changes in oil and gas prices; securities market conditions; the level and volatility of interest rates and equity prices; competitive conditions; liquidity of global markets; international and regional political conditions; regulatory and legislative developments; monetary and fiscal policy; investor sentiment; availability and cost of capital; technological changes and events; outcome of legal proceedings; changes in currency values; inflation; credit ratings; and the size, volume and timing of transactions. A decline in the fair value of the assets under management, caused by a decline in general economic conditions, would decrease our wealth management fee income.
Investment performance is one of the most important factors in retaining existing clients and competing for new wealth management clients. Poor investment performance could reduce our revenues and impair our growth in the following ways:
  existing clients may withdraw funds from our wealth management business in favor of better performing products;
  asset-based management fees could decline from a decrease in assets under management;
  our ability to attract funds from existing and new clients might diminish; and
  our wealth managers and investment advisors may depart, to join a competitor or otherwise.
Even when market conditions are generally favorable, our investment performance may be adversely affected by the investment style of our wealth management and investment advisors and the particular investments that they make. To the extent our future investment performance is perceived to be poor in either relative or absolute terms, the revenues and profitability of our wealth management business will likely be reduced and our ability to attract new clients will likely be impaired. As such, fluctuations in the equity and debt markets can have a direct impact upon our net earnings. In addition, as approximately 13% of trust fees comes from management of oil and gas properties, a decline in the prices of oil and gas could lead to a loss of material amounts of our trust income.

Certain of our investment advisory and wealth management contracts are subject to termination on short notice, and termination of a significant number of investment advisory contracts could have a material adverse impact on our revenue.
Certain of our investment advisory and wealth management clients can terminate, with little or no notice, their relationships with us, reduce their aggregate assets under management, or shift their funds to other types of accounts with different rate structures for any number of reasons, including investment performance, changes in prevailing interest rates, inflation, changes in investment preferences of clients, changes in our reputation in the marketplace, change in management or control of clients, loss of key investment management personnel and financial market performance. We cannot be certain that our trust company subsidiary will be able to retain all of its clients. If its clients terminate their investment advisory and wealth management contracts, our trust company subsidiary, and consequently we, could lose a substantial portion of our revenues.
We are subject to possible claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility.
From time to time, customers could make claims and take legal action pertaining to our performance of our fiduciary responsibilities. Whether customer claims and legal action related to our performance of our fiduciary responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to us, they may result in significant financial liability and/or adversely affect our market perception of our products and services as well as impact customer demand for those products and services. Any financial liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on our business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is subject to significant government regulation.
We operate in a highly-regulated environment and are subject to supervision and regulation by a number of governmental regulatory agencies, including the Texas Department of Banking, the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC, and the FDIC. Regulations adopted by these agencies, which are generally intended to provide protection for depositors and customers rather than for the benefit of shareholders, govern a comprehensive range of matters relating to ownership and control of our shares, our acquisition of other companies and businesses, permissible activities for us to engage in, maintenance of adequate capital levels and other aspects of our operations. The bank regulatory agencies possess broad authority to prevent or remedy unsafe or unsound practices or violations of law.
The Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in July 2010, instituted major changes to the banking and financial institutions regulatory regimes in light of the recent performance of and government intervention in the financial services sector. Other changes to statues, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations or policies, could affect the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject the Company to reduced revenues, additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products the Company may offer and/or increase the ability of
to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, the banking regulations could prohibit and significantly delay the Company’s acquisition of other financial institutions.
Included in the Dodd-Frank Act are, for example, changes related to interchange fees and overdraft services. While the changes for interchange fees that can be charged for electronic debit transactions by payment card issuers relate only to banks with assets greater than $10 billion, concern exists that these regulations will also impact our Company and we continue approach the $10 billion asset level each year. We are also prohibited from charging customers fees for paying overdrafts on automated teller machine and debit card transactions, unless the consumer opts in. We continue to monitor the impact of these new regulations and other developments on our service charge revenue.
Federal income tax reform could have unforeseen effects on our financial condition and results of operations.
On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.” The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act included a number of provisions, including the lowering of the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35%

to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. There were also provisions that may partially offset the benefit of such rate reduction. The intended and unintended consequences of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on our business and on holders of our common shares is uncertain and could be adverse. Changes in the political makeup of the Senate and House of Representatives in the U.S. Congress could result also in the reversal of some or all of the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
New accounting standard, effective January 1, 2020, will result in a significant change in how we recognize credit losses and may have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations
Effective January 1, 2020, the Company implemented the provision of
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.”
represents a comprehensive change in estimating the allowance for loan losses from the current “incurred loss” model of losses inherent in the loan portfolio to a current “expected loss” model, which encompasses losses expected to be incurred over the life of the portfolio.
We are completing our implementation plan with our cross-functional working group, under the direction of our Chief Credit Officer along with our Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Lending Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The working group also included individuals from various functional areas including credit, risk management, accounting and information technology, among others. Our implementation plan included assessment and documentation of processes, internal controls and data sources; model development, documentation and validation; and system configuration among other things. We contracted with a third-party vendor to assist us in the application of ASU
The measurement of expected credit losses under ASU
will be based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. This measurement will take place at the time the financial asset is first added to the balance sheet and periodically thereafter. This differs significantly from the “incurred loss” model required under current generally accepted accounting principles, which delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. Accordingly, we expect that the adoption of ASU
could materially affect how we determine our allowance for loan losses and could require us to significantly increase our allowance. Moreover, ASU
may create more volatility in the level of our allowance for loan losses. If we are required to materially increase our level of allowance for loan losses for any reason, such increase could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our FDIC insurance assessments could increase substantially resulting in higher operating costs.
We have historically paid the lowest premium rate available due to our sound financial position and in 2019 and carrying over into 2020 have received certain credits that further reduced the FDIC insurance premium paid. Should the number of bank failures increase or the FDIC insurance fund become depleted in others ways, FDIC premiums could increase or additional special assessments could be imposed. These increased premiums would have an adverse effect on our net income and results of operations.
We compete with many larger financial institutions which have substantially greater financial resources than we have.
Competition among financial institutions in Texas is intense. We compete with other bank holding companies, state and national commercial banks, savings and loan associations, consumer financial companies, credit unions, securities brokers, insurance companies, mortgage banking companies, money market mutual funds, asset-based
lenders and other financial institutions. Many of these competitors have substantially greater financial resources, larger lending limits, larger branch networks, enhanced technology and less regulatory oversight than we do, and are able to offer a broader range of products and services than we can. Failure to compete effectively for deposit, loan and other banking customers in our markets could cause us to lose market share, slow our growth rate and may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

We are subject to interest rate risk.
Our profitability is dependent to a large extent on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income we earn as a result of interest paid to us on loans and investments and interest we pay to third parties such as our depositors and those from whom we borrow funds. Like most financial institutions, we are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Federal Reserve Board. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest we receive on loans and securities and the amount of interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect (i) our ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, (ii) the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities, and (iii) the average duration of our securities portfolio. If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and investments, our net interest income, and earnings, could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings.
The Federal Reserve Board began raising interest rates in late 2015 and continued to increase through 2018. Beginning in August 2019, the Federal Reserve Board decreased rates a total of 75 basis points. Today, there is substantial uncertainty regarding future interest rates. Increases in interest rates can have negative impacts on our business, including reducing our customers’ desire to borrow money from us or adversely affecting their ability to repay their outstanding loans by increasing their debt obligations through the periodic reset of adjustable interest rate loans. If our borrowers’ ability to pay their loans is impaired by increasing interest payment obligations, our level of
assets would increase, producing an adverse effect on operating results. Asset values, especially commercial real estate as collateral, securities or other fixed rate earning assets, can decline significantly with relatively minor changes in interest rates. Conversely, decreases in interest rates can effect the amount of interest we earn on our loans and investment securities, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Although we have implemented strategies which we believe reduce the potential effects of adverse changes in interest rates on our results of operations, these strategies may not always be successful. Any of these events could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Uncertainty relating to the London interbank offered rate (“LIBOR”) calculation process and potential phasing out of LIBOR may adversely affect us.
On July 27, 2017, the Chief Executive of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR to the administrator of LIBOR after 2021. The announcement indicates that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. It is impossible to predict whether and to what extent banks will continue to provide LIBOR submissions to the administrator of LIBOR or whether any additional reforms to LIBOR may be enacted in the United Kingdom or elsewhere. At this time, no consensus exists as to what rate or rates may become acceptable alternatives to LIBOR and it is impossible to predict the effect of any such alternatives on the value of LIBOR-based securities and variable rate loans, debentures, or other securities or financial arrangements, given LIBOR’s role in determining market interest rates globally. Uncertainty as to the nature of alternative reference rates and as to potential changes or other reforms to LIBOR may adversely affect LIBOR rates and the value of LIBOR-based loans and securities in our portfolio and may impact the availability and cost of hedging instruments and borrowings. If LIBOR rates are no longer available, and we are required to implement substitute indices for the calculation of interest rates under our loan agreements with our borrowers, we may incur significant expenses in effecting the transition, and may be subject to disputes or litigation with customers over the appropriateness or comparability to LIBOR of the substitute indices, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
We are subject to liquidity risk.
The Company requires liquidity to meet our deposit and other obligations as they come due. The Company’s access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance its activities or on terms that are acceptable to it could be impaired by factors that affect it specifically or the financial services industry or the general economy. Factors that could reduce its access to liquidity sources include a downturn in the Texas market, difficult credit markets or adverse regulatory actions against the Company. The Company’s access to deposits may also be affected by the

liquidity needs of its depositors. In particular, a substantial majority of the Company’s liabilities are demand, savings, interest checking and money market deposits, which are payable on demand or upon several days’ notice, while by comparison, a substantial portion of its assets are loans, which cannot be called or sold in the same time frame. The Company may not be able to replace maturing deposits and advances as necessary in the future, especially if a large number of its depositors sought to withdraw their accounts, regardless of the reason. A failure to maintain adequate liquidity could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and result of operations.
The value of certain securities in our investment portfolio may be negatively affected by changes or disruptions in the market for these securities.
Our investment portfolio securities include obligations of, and mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by, government sponsored enterprises such as the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Government National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and the Federal Home Loan Bank or otherwise backed by Federal Housing Administration or Veteran’s Administration guaranteed loans; however, volatility or illiquidity in financial markets may cause investment securities held within our investment portfolio to fall in value or become less liquid. Increases in interest rates may cause a decline in the value of securities held by the Company. Uncertainty surrounding the credit risk associated with mortgage collateral or guarantors may cause material discrepancies in valuation estimates obtained from third parties. Volatile market conditions may reduce valuations due to the perception of heightened credit and liquidity risks in addition to interest rate risk typically associated with these securities. There can be no assurance that declines in market value associated with these disruptions will not result in impairments of these assets, which would lead to accounting charges that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, equity and capital ratios.
First Financial Bankshares, Inc. relies on dividends from its subsidiaries for most of its revenue.
First Financial Bankshares
Inc. is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries. It receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends paid by its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on the Company’s common stock to shareholders and interest and principal on First Financial Bankshares, Inc. debt (if we had balances outstanding). Various federal and/or state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that our bank and trust subsidiaries may pay to First Financial Bankshares, Inc. In the event our subsidiaries are unable to pay dividends to First Financial Bankshares, Inc., First Financial Bankshares, Inc. may not be able to service debt, if any, or pay dividends on the Company’s common stock. The inability to receive dividends from our subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
To continue our growth, we are affected by our ability to identify and acquire other financial institutions.
We intend to continue our current growth strategy. This strategy includes opening new branches and acquiring other banks that serve customers or markets we find desirable. The market for acquisitions remains highly competitive, and we may be unable to find satisfactory acquisition candidates in the future that fit our acquisition and growth strategy. To the extent that we are unable to find suitable acquisition candidates, an important component of our growth strategy may be lost. Additionally, our completed acquisitions, or any future acquisitions, may not produce the revenue, earnings or synergies that we anticipated.
We may not be able to complete future acquisitions, may not be successful in realizing the benefits of any acquisitions that are completed, or may choose not to pursue acquisition opportunities we might find beneficial.
A substantial part of our historical growth has been a result of acquisitions of other financial institutions, and we may, from time to time, evaluate and engage in the acquisition of other financial institutions. We must generally satisfy a number of conditions prior to completing any such transaction, including certain bank regulatory approvals. Bank regulators consider a number of factors with regard to all institutions involved in the transaction when determining whether to approve a proposed transaction, including, among others, the ratings and compliance history, anti-money laundering and Bank Secrecy Act compliance history, CRA examination results and the effect of the proposed transaction on the financial stability of the institutions involved and the market as a whole.

The process for obtaining required regulatory approvals has become substantially more difficult, time-consuming and unpredictable as a result of the financial crisis. We may fail to pursue, evaluate or complete strategic and competitively significant business opportunities as a result of our inability, or our perceived inability, to obtain required regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all.
Assuming we are able to successfully complete one or more transactions, we may not be able to successfully integrate and realize the expected synergies from any completed transaction in a timely manner or at all. In particular, we may be charged by federal and state regulators with regulatory and compliance failures at an acquired business prior to the date of the acquisition, and these failures by the acquired company may have negative consequences for us, including the imposition of formal or informal enforcement actions. Completion and integration of any transaction may also divert management’s attention from other matters, result in additional costs and expenses, or adversely affect our relationships with our customers and employees, any of which may adversely affect our business or results of operations. As a result, our financial condition may be affected, and we may become more susceptible to general economic conditions and competitive pressures.
Use of our common stock for future acquisitions or to raise capital may be dilutive to existing stockholders.
When we determine that appropriate strategic opportunities exist, we may acquire other financial institutions and related businesses, subject to applicable regulatory requirements. We may use our common stock for such acquisitions. We may also seek to raise capital through selling additional common stock, although we have not historically done so. It is possible that the issuance of additional common stock in such acquisition or capital transactions may be dilutive to the interests of our existing shareholders.
If we are unable to continue our historical levels of growth, we may not be able to maintain our historical earnings trends.
To achieve our past levels of growth, we have focused on both internal growth and acquisitions. We may not be able to sustain our historical rate of growth or may not be able to grow at all. Additionally, we may not be able to obtain the financing necessary to fund additional growth and may not be able to find suitable acquisition candidates. Various factors, such as economic conditions, competition and heightened regulatory scrutiny, may impede or prohibit the opening of new banking centers and the completion of acquisitions. Further, we may be unable to attract and retain experienced bankers, which could adversely affect our internal growth. If we are not able to continue our historical levels of growth, we may not be able to maintain our historical earnings trends.
Our accounting estimates and risk management processes rely on analytical and forecasting models.
The processes we use to estimate our allowance for loan losses and to measure the fair value of financial instruments, as well as the processes used to estimate the effects of changing interest rates depends upon the use of analytical and forecasting models. In addition, these models are used to calculate fair value of our assets and liabilities when we acquire other financial institutions. These models reflect assumptions that may not be accurate, particularly in times of market stress or other unforeseen circumstances. Even if these assumptions are adequate, the models may prove to be inadequate or inaccurate because of other flaws in their design or their implementation. If the models we use for interest rate risk and asset-liability management are inadequate, we may incur increased or unexpected losses upon changes in market interest rates or other market measures. If the models we use for determining our probable loan losses are inadequate, the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to support future charge-offs. If the models we use to measure the fair value financial instruments is inadequate, the fair value of such financial instruments may fluctuate unexpectedly or may not accurately reflect what we could realize upon sale or settlement of such financial instruments. Such failure in our analytical or forecasting models could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The value of our goodwill and other intangible assets may decline in the future.
As of December 31, 2019, we had $173.67 million of goodwill and other intangible assets. A significant decline in our financial condition, a significant adverse change in the business climate, slower growth rates or a significant and sustained decline in the price of our common stock may necessitate taking charges in the future related to the impairment of our goodwill and other intangible assets. If we were to conclude that a future write-down of goodwill and other intangible assets is necessary, we would record the appropriate charge, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We rely heavily on our management team, and the unexpected loss of key management or inability to recruit qualified personnel in the future may adversely affect our operations.
Our success to date has been strongly influenced by our ability to attract and to retain senior management experienced in banking in the markets we serve. Our ability to retain executive officers and the current management teams will continue to be important to the successful implementation of our strategies. We do not have employment agreements with these key employees other than executive agreements in the event of a change of control and a confidential information,
agreements related to our stock options and restricted stock. The unexpected loss of services of any key management personnel, or the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results. In addition, the scope and content of U.S. banking regulators’ policies on incentive compensation, could adversely affect our ability to hire, retain and motivate our key employees.
The Company’s stock price can be volatile.
Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for our shareholders to resell their common stock when they want and at prices they find attractive. The Company’s stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors including, among other things:
  actual or anticipated variations in quarterly results of operations;
  recommendations by securities analysts;
  operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to the Company;
  new reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in the financial services industry or Texas economy, including oil and gas and cattle prices;
  perceptions in the marketplace regarding the Company and/or its competitors;
  new technology used, or services offered, by competitors;
  significant acquisitions or business combinations involving the Company or its competitors; and
  changes in government regulations, including tax laws.
General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trends could also cause the Company’s stock price to decrease regardless of operational results.
We may not continue to pay dividends on our common stock in the future.
Holders of our common stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our board of directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. Although we have historically declared cash dividends on our common stock, we are not required to do so and may reduce or eliminate our common stock dividends in the future. This could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Also, we are a bank holding company, and our ability to declare and pay dividends is dependent on certain federal regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board regarding capital adequacy and dividends.

Certain banking laws may have an anti-takeover effect.
Provisions of federal banking laws, including regulatory approval requirements, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would be perceived to be beneficial to our shareholders. These provisions effectively inhibit a
merger or other business combination, which, in turn, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
The trading volume in our common stock is less than other larger financial institutions.
Although the Company’s common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, the trading volume in our common stock is less than that of other, larger financial services companies although such volume has increased in recent years. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of the Company’s common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which the Company has no control. Given the lower trading volume of the Company’s common stock, significant sales of the Company’s common stock, or the expectation of these sales, could cause the Company’s stock price to fall.
Our stock ownership has shifted to larger institutional shareholders
Our ownership base has shifted over the past several years resulting in a greater percentage of ownership by institutional investors and indexed funds as compared to shareholders located in our footprint. These institutional shareholders could decide to sell their holdings in our common stock and as such could result in lower market prices of our stock.
Breakdowns in our internal controls and procedures could have an adverse effect on us.
We believe our internal control system as currently documented and functioning is adequate to provide reasonable assurance over our internal controls. Nevertheless, because of the inherent limitation in administering a cost effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Breakdowns in our internal controls and procedures could occur in the future, and any such breakdowns could have an adverse effect on us. See “Item 9A – Controls and Procedures” for additional information.
Our operations rely on certain external vendors.
We rely on certain external vendors to provide products and services necessary to maintain our
operations. Accordingly, our operations are exposed to risk that these vendors will not perform in accordance with the contracted agreements under service level agreements. The failure of an external vendor to perform in accordance with the contracted arrangements under service level agreements, because of changes in the vendor’s organizational structure, financial condition, support for existing products or services or strategic focus or for any other reason, could be disruptive to our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and, in turn, our financial condition and results of operations.
We compete in an industry that continually experiences technological change, and we may have fewer resources than many of our competitors to continue to invest in technological improvements.
The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes, with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services and new fintech companies. In addition to improving the ability to serve customers, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for conveniences, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our larger competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers.

System failure or cybersecurity breaches of our network security could subject us to increased operating costs as well as litigation and other potential losses.
The computer systems and network infrastructure we use could be vulnerable to unforeseen hardware and cybersecurity issues, including “hacking” and “identity theft.” Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect our computer equipment against damage from fire, power loss, telecommunications failure or a similar catastrophic event. Any damage or failure that causes an interruption in our operations could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect the computer systems and network infrastructure utilized by us, including our Internet banking activities, against damage from physical
cybersecurity breaches and other disruptive problems caused by the Internet or other users. Such computer
and other disruptions would jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and network infrastructure, which may result in significant liability to us, damage our reputation and inhibit current and potential customers from our Internet banking services. Each year, we add additional security measures to our computer systems and network infrastructure to mitigate the possibility of cybersecurity breaches including firewalls and penetration testing. We continue to investigate cost effective measures as well as insurance protection.
Furthermore, our customers could incorrectly blame the Company and terminate their accounts with the Company for a cyber-incident which occurred on their own system or with that of an unrelated third party. In addition, a security breach could also subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny and expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability.
Our business may be adversely affected by security breaches at third parties.
Our customers interact with their own and other third-party systems, which pose operational risks to us. We may be adversely affected by data breaches at retailers and other third parties who maintain data relating to our customers that involve the theft of customers data, including the theft of customers’ debit card, merchant credit card, wire transfer and other identifying and/or access information used to make purchases or payments at retailers and other third parties.
In the event of a data breach at one or more retailers of considerable magnitude, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Our reputation and business could be damaged by negative publicity.
Reputation risk, or the risk to our earnings and capital by negative public opinion, is inherent in our business. Negative public opinion could adversely affect our ability to keep and attract customers and expose us to adverse legal and regulatory consequences. Negative public opinion could result from our actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices, corporate governance, perception of our environmental, social and governance practices and disclosures, regulatory compliance, mergers and acquisitions, sharing or inadequate protection of customer information, and from actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to that conduct. Negative public opinion could also result from adverse news or publicity that impairs the reputation of the financial services industry. In addition, adverse publicity or negative information posted on social media, whether or not factually correct, may adversely impact our business prospects or financial results.
We are subject to claims and litigation pertaining to intellectual property.
We rely on technology companies to provide information technology products and services necessary to support our
operations. Technology companies frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of patent infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. In addition, patent holding companies seek to monetize patents they have purchased or otherwise obtained. Competitors of our vendors, or other individuals or companies, have from time to time claimed to hold intellectual property sold to us by its vendors. Such claims may increase in the future as the financial services sector becomes more reliant on information technology vendors. The plaintiffs in these actions frequently seek injunctions and substantial damages.

Regardless of the scope or validity of such patents or other intellectual property rights, or the merits of any claims by potential or actual litigants, we may have to engage in litigation that could be expensive, time-consuming, disruptive to our operations, and distracting to management. If we are found to infringe one or more patents or other intellectual property rights, we may be required to pay substantial damages or royalties to a third-party. In certain cases, we may consider entering into licensing agreements for disputed intellectual property, although no assurance can be given that such licenses can be obtained on acceptable terms or that litigation will not occur. These licenses may also significantly increase our operating expenses. If legal matters related to intellectual property claims were resolved against us or settled, we could be required to make payments in amounts that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
An investment in our common stock is not an insured deposit.
Our common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the FDIC, any other deposit insurance fund, or by any other public or private entity. Investment in our common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Report. As a result, if you acquire our common stock, you may lose some or all of your investment.
Our principal office is located in the First Financial Bank Building at 400 Pine Street in downtown Abilene, Texas. We lease two spaces in buildings owned by First Financial Bank, National Association, Abilene, Texas totaling approximately 10,155 square feet. As of December 31, 2019, our subsidiaries collectively own 70 banking facilities, some of which are detached
and also lease 11 banking facilities and 13 ATM locations. Our management considers all our existing locations to be well-suited for conducting the business of banking. We believe our existing facilities are adequate to meet our requirements and our subsidiaries’ requirements for the foreseeable future.
From time to time, we and our subsidiaries are parties to lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our banking business. However, there are no material pending legal proceedings to which we, our subsidiaries or our other direct and indirect subsidiaries, or any of their properties, are currently subject. Other than regular, routine examinations by state and federal banking authorities, there are no proceedings pending or known to be contemplated by any governmental authorities.
Not applicable.
Market Information
Our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the trading symbol FFIN. See “Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Quarterly Financial Data” for the high, low and closing sales prices as reported by the Nasdaq Global Select Market for our common stock for the periods indicated.

Record Holders
As of February 1, 2020, we had 1,143 registered shareholders of record with our stock transfer agent.
See “Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Quarterly Results of Operations” for the frequency and amount of cash dividends paid by us. Also, see “Item 1 – Business – Supervision and Regulation – Payment of Dividends” and “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity – Dividends” for restrictions on our present or future ability to pay dividends, particularly those restrictions arising under federal and state banking laws.
Equity Compensation Plans
See “Item 12 – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters”.

The following performance graph compares cumulative total shareholder returns for our common stock, the Russell 3000 Index, and the SNL Bank Index, which is a banking index prepared by SNL Financial LC and is comprised of banks with $5 billion to $10 billion in total assets, for a five-year period (December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2019). The performance graph assumes $100 invested in our common stock at its closing price on December 31, 2014, and in each of the Russell 3000 Index and the SNL Bank Index on the same date. The performance graph also assumes the reinvestment of all dividends. The dates on the performance graph represent the last trading day of each year indicated. The amounts noted on the performance graph have been adjusted to give effect to all stock splits and stock dividends.
First Financial Bankshares, Inc
Period Ending
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
Russell 3000
SNL Bank
Source : SNL Financial, an offering of S&P Global Market Intelligence
© 2020

The selected financial data presented below as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015, have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes presented elsewhere in this Form
The results of operations presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be achieved in the future. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations incorporates information required to be disclosed by the SEC’s Industry Guide 3, “Statistical Disclosure by Bank Holding Companies.”
Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Summary Income Statement Information:
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Earnings before income taxes
Income tax expense
Net earnings
Per Share Data:
Earnings per share, basic
Earnings per share, assuming dilution
Cash dividends declared
Book value at
Earnings performance ratios:
Return on average assets
Return on average equity
Summary Balance Sheet Data
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total shareholders’ equity
Asset quality ratios:
Allowance for loan
loans plus foreclosed assets
Net charge offs/average loans
Capital ratios:
Average shareholders’ equity/average assets
Leverage ratio (1)
Tier 1 risk-based capital (2)
Common equity tier 1 capital (3)
Total risk-based capital (4)
Dividend payout ratio
(1) Calculated by dividing at
shareholders’ equity (before accumulated other comprehensive earnings/loss) less intangible assets by fourth quarter average assets less intangible assets.
(2) Calculated by dividing at
shareholders’ equity (before accumulated other comprehensive earnings/loss) less intangible assets by risk-adjusted assets.
(3) Calculated by dividing at
shareholders’ equity (before accumulated other comprehensive earnings/loss) less intangible assets by risk-adjusted assets.
(4) Calculated by dividing at
shareholders’ equity (before accumulated other comprehensive earnings/loss) less intangible assets plus allowance for loan losses to the extent allowed under regulatory guidelines by risk-adjusted assets.

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to those listed in “Item 1A – Risk Factors” and in the “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” notice on page 1.
As a financial holding company, we generate most of our revenue from interest on loans and investments, trust fees, and service charges. Our primary source of funding for our loans and investments are deposits held by our bank subsidiary, First Financial Bank, National Association, Abilene, Texas. Our largest expenses are salaries and related employee benefits. We measure our performance by calculating our return on average assets, return on average equity, our regulatory leverage and risk based capital ratios and our efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing noninterest expense by the sum of net interest income on a tax equivalent basis and noninterest income.
The following discussion and analysis of the major elements of our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and consolidated statements of earnings for the years 2017 through 2019 should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes, and selected financial data presented elsewhere in this Form
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare consolidated financial statements based on generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and customary practices in the banking industry. These policies, in certain areas, require us to make significant estimates and assumptions.
We deem a policy critical if (1) the accounting estimate required us to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time we make the accounting estimate; and (2) different estimates that reasonably could have been used in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, would have a material impact on the financial statements.
We deem our most critical accounting policies to be (1) our allowance for loan losses and our provision for loan losses and (2) our valuation of securities. We have other significant accounting policies and continue to evaluate the materiality of their impact on our consolidated financial statements, but we believe these other policies either do not generally require us to make estimates and judgments that are difficult or subjective, or it is less likely they would have a material impact on our reported results for a given period. A discussion of (1) our allowance for loan losses and our provision for loan losses and (2) our valuation of securities is included in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page
On October 12, 2017, we entered into an agreement and plan of reorganization to acquire Commercial Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned bank subsidiary, Commercial State Bank, Kingwood, Texas. On January 1, 2018, the transaction closed. Pursuant to the agreement, we issued 1.29 million shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of Commercial Bancshares, Inc. In addition, in accordance with the plan of reorganization, Commercial Bancshares, Inc. paid a special dividend totaling $22.08 million to its shareholders prior to the closing of this transaction. At the closing, Kingwood Merger Sub., Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, merged into Commercial Bancshares Inc., with Commercial Bancshares, Inc. surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Immediately following such merger, Commercial Bancshares, Inc. was merged into the Company and Commercial State Bank, Kingwood, Texas was merged into First Financial Bank, National Association, Abilene, Texas, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The total purchase price exceeded the estimated fair value net of assets acquired by approximately $31.59 million and the Company recorded such excess as goodwill. The balance sheet and results of operations of Commercial Bancshares, Inc. are included in the financial statements of the Company effective January 1, 2018.

On September 19, 2019, we entered into an agreement and plan of reorganization to acquire TB&T Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned bank subsidiary, The Bank & Trust of Bryan/College Station. On January 1, 2020, the transaction closed. Pursuant to the agreement, we issued 6.28 million shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of TB&T Bancshares, Inc. In addition, in accordance with the plan of reorganization, TB&T Bancshares, Inc. paid a special dividend totaling $1.92 million to its shareholders prior to the closing of this transaction. At the closing, Brazos Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, merged into TB&T Bancshares Inc., with TB&T Bancshares, Inc. surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Immediately following such merger, TB&T Bancshares, Inc. was merged into the Company and The Bank & Trust of Bryan/College Station, Texas was merged into First Financial Bank, National Association, Abilene, Texas, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The total purchase price exceeded the estimated fair value net of assets acquired by approximately $143.2 million and the Company recorded such excess as goodwill. The balance sheet and results of operations of TB&T Bancshares, Inc. will be included in the financial statements of the Company effective January 1, 2020. At December 31, 2019, The Bank & Trust of Bryan/College Station had gross loans totaling $455.40 million, total deposits of $551.90 million and total assets of $631.10 million.
Stock Split and Increase in Authorized Shares
On April 23, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a
stock split of the Company’s outstanding common shares effective June 3, 2019. In addition, the shareholders of the Company approved an amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation to increase the number of authorized shares to 200,000,000. All per share amounts in the annual report on Form 10-K have been restated to reflect this stock split. An amount equal to the par value of the additional common shares to be issued pursuant to the stock split was reflected as a transfer from retained earnings to common stock in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Implementation of New Accounting Standard for Accounting for Allowance for Loan Losses
Effective January 1, 2020, the Company implemented the provision of
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.”
represents a comprehensive change in estimating the allowance for loan losses from the current “incurred loss” model of losses inherent in the loan portfolio to a current “expected loss” model, which encompasses losses expected to be incurred over the life of the portfolio. For publicly traded companies, ASU
was effective January 1, 2020 and will be effective for the quarter ending March 31, 2020.
We are completing our implementation plan with our cross-functional working group, under the direction of our Chief Credit Officer along with our Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Lending Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The working group also included individuals from various functional areas including credit, risk management, accounting and information technology, among others. Our implementation plan included assessment and documentation of processes, internal controls and data sources; model development, documentation and validation; and system configuration, among other things. We contracted with a third-party vendor to assist us in the application of ASU
While we continue to analyze and modify our calculations, we currently expect the adoption of ASU
will result in an allowance for loan losses amount at January 1, 2020 in the range of $45.0 million to $51.0 million. At December 31, 2019, our allowance for loan losses totaled $52.5 million. In addition, ASU
will necessitate that we establish an allowance for expected credit losses for certain debt securities and other financial assets; however, we do not expect these allowances to be significant. Additionally, the adoption of ASU
is not expected to have a significant impact on our regulatory capital ratios. The ultimate final impact of adoption of
could be significantly different than our current expectation as our modeling process is further refined.
Other New Accounting Standards Issued but Not Yet Effective
ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other
.” ASU
will amend and simplify current goodwill impairment testing to eliminate Step 2 from the current provisions. Under the new guidance, an entity should perform the goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. An entity still has the option to perform the quantitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. ASU
will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2020 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820). – Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.”
modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820. The amendments in ASU
remove disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial, modify/clarify the specific requirements of certain disclosures, and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant. ASU
became effective on January 1, 2020 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Results of Operations
Performance Summary
. Net earnings for 2019 were $164.81 million, an increase of $14.17 million, or 9.41%, over net earnings for 2018 of $150.64 million. Net earnings for 2017 were $120.37 million. The increase in net earnings for 2019 over 2018 were primarily attributable to the growth in net interest income and noninterest income and the increase in net earnings for 2018 over 2017 was primarily attributable to the change in income tax rates.
On a basic net earnings per share basis, net earnings were $1.22 for 2019, as compared to $1.11 for 2018 and $0.91 for 2017. The return on average assets was 2.08% for 2019, as compared to 1.98% for 2018 and 1.72% for 2017. The return on average equity was 14.37% for 2019, as compared to 15.37% for 2018 and to 13.63% for 2017.
Net Interest Income
. Net interest income is the difference between interest income on earning assets and interest expense on liabilities incurred to fund those assets. Our earning assets consist primarily of loans and investment securities. Our liabilities to fund those assets consist primarily of noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing deposits.
net interest income was $295.88 million in 2019, as compared to $281.75 million in 2018, and $262.18 million in 2017. Average earning assets were $7.44 billion in 2019, as compared to $7.12 billion in 2018 and $6.54 billion in 2017. The increase in
net interest income in 2019 compared to 2018 was largely attributable to increases in interest earning assets. The increase of $326.97 million in average earning assets in 2019 when compared to 2018 was primarily a result of increases in loans of $246.63 million and taxable securities of $156.33 million when compared to 2018. The increase in
net interest income in 2018 compared to 2017 was largely attributable to increases in the volume of interest earning assets offset by rate increases on our interest-bearing liabilities. The increase of $570.96 million in average earning assets in 2018 when compared to 2017 was primarily a result of increases in loans of $392.59 million and taxable securities of $454.46 million. These increases were offset by a decline of $222.01 million in
securities. Average interest-bearing liabilities were $4.61 billion in 2019, as compared to $4.47 billion in 2018 and $4.21 billion in 2017. The yield on earning assets increased fifteen basis points in 2019 when compared to 2018 while the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased twenty-three basis points. The yield on earning assets increased eight basis points in 2018 when compared to 2017 while the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased twenty basis points.

Table 1 allocates the change in
net interest income between the amount of change attributable to volume and to rate.
Table 1 — Changes in Interest Income and Interest Expense (in thousands):
2019 Compared to 2018
2018 Compared to 2017
Change Attributable to
Change Attributable to
Short-term investments
)   $
)   $
Taxable investment securities
investment securities (1)
Loans (1) (2)
Interest income
Interest-bearing deposits
Short-term borrowings
Interest expense
Net interest income
(1) Computed on
basis assuming marginal tax rate of 21% for 2019 and 2018 and 35% for 2017.
loans are included in loans.
The net interest margin in 2019 was 3.98%, an increase of two basis points from 2018 which decreased five basis points from 2017. We continued to experience downward pressures on our net interest margin in 2019 and 2018 primarily due to (i) the change in the income tax rate from 35% to 21% from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and its effect on our tax free municipal bonds and tax free loans, (ii) extended period of fluctuating historically low levels of short-term interest rates, and (iii) flat to inverted yield curve currently being experienced in the bond market. We have been able to somewhat mitigate the impact of these lower short-term interest rates and the flat/inverted yield curve by establishing minimum interest rates on certain of our loans, improving the pricing for loan risk, and minimizing rates paid on interest bearing liabilities. As rates fluctuate, we adjust loan rates as appropriate, upon maturities, and convert to variable rates when we are able. The Federal Reserve increased rates 100 basis points in 2018, 75 basis points in 2017 and 25 basis points in 2016 and 2015, but decreased rates by 75 basis points during 2019.

The net interest margin, which measures
net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets, is illustrated in Table 2 for the years 2017 through 2019.
Table 2 — Average Balances and Average Yields and Rates (in thousands, except percentages):
Short-term investments (1)
%   $
%   $
Taxable investment securities (2)
investment securities (2)(3)
Loans (3)(4)
Total earning assets
Cash and due from banks
Bank premises and equipment, net
Other assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net