-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, PfnQmZcAOp7dTT2LgpK3Rw/sJQDsOQIxgzbyxRrSFAF3rxBzSG0r0QyDl2aZXlXd tUOeiLxDMG9F31c47GDrgg== 0001140361-08-005238.txt : 20080228 0001140361-08-005238.hdr.sgml : 20080228 20080228123055 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001140361-08-005238 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 10 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20071231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20080228 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20080228 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: TRUSTCO BANK CORP N Y CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000357301 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: STATE COMMERCIAL BANKS [6022] IRS NUMBER: 141630287 STATE OF INCORPORATION: NY FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-10592 FILM NUMBER: 08649268 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 5 SARNOWSKI DRIVE CITY: GLENVILLE STATE: NY ZIP: 12302 BUSINESS PHONE: 5183773311 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 5 SARNOWSKI DRIVE CITY: GLENVILLE STATE: NY ZIP: 12302 10-K 1 form10k.htm TRUSTCO BANK CORP NY 10-K 12-31-2007 form10k.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K

x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007
Or
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the transition period from ____________________ to ____________________

Commission file number 0-10592

TRUSTCO BANK CORP NY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

NEW YORK
 
14-1630287
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

5 SARNOWSKI DRIVE, GLENVILLE, NEW YORK 12302
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (518) 377-3311

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
 
Name of exchange on which registered)
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
 
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

______________

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes.S No.£

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes.£ No.S

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes.S No.£

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K. S

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large Accelerated Filer S
Accelerated Filer £
Non-Accelerated Filer £ (Do not check if smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes. £ No. S

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2007 was approximately  $711,596,863 (based upon the closing price of $9.88 on June 30, 2007, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market).

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of February 22, 2008 was 75,526,851.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: (1) Portions of registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (Part I and Part II) and (2) Portions of registrant's Proxy Statement filed for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 19, 2008 (Part III).
 


 
1

 

INDEX


Description
Page
   
3
 
         
PART I
     
 
Item 1
4-14
 
 
Item 1A
14-19
 
 
Item 1B
19
 
 
Item 2
19
 
 
Item 3
19
 
 
Item 4
19
 
         
PART II
     
 
Item 5
21-22
 
 
Item 6
22
 
 
Item 7
22
 
 
Item 7A
22
 
 
Item 8
22
 
 
Item 9
23
 
 
Item 9A
23
 
 
Item 9B
23
 
         
PART III
     
 
Item 10
23-24
 
 
Item 11
24
 
 
Item 12
24
 
 
Item 13
24
 
 
Item 14
25
 
         
PART IV
     
 
Item 15
25-29
 
         
   
30-31
 
         
32-36
 

2


USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has adopted Regulation G, which applies to all public disclosures, including earnings releases, made by registered companies that contain “non-GAAP financial measures.”  GAAP is generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.  Under Regulation G, companies making disclosures containing non-GAAP financial measures must also disclose, along with each non-GAAP financial measure, certain additional information, including a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure to the closest comparable GAAP financial measure and a statement of the company’s reasons for utilizing the non-GAAP financial measure as part of its financial disclosures.  At the same time that the SEC issued Regulation G, it also made amendments to Item 10 of Regulation S-K, requiring companies to make the same types of supplemental disclosures whenever they include non-GAAP financial measures in their filings with the SEC.  The SEC has exempted from the definition of “non-GAAP financial measures” certain specific types of commonly used financial measures that are not based on GAAP.  When these exempted measures are included in public disclosures or SEC filings, supplemental information is not required.  The following measures used in this Report which have not been specifically exempted by the SEC may nevertheless constitute “non-GAAP financial measures” within the meaning of the SEC’s new rules, although we are unable to state with certainty that the SEC would so regard them.

Tax-Equivalent Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin:  Net interest income, as a component of the tabular presentation by financial institutions of Selected Financial Information regarding their recently completed operations, is commonly presented on a tax-equivalent basis.  That is, to the extent that some component of the institution’s net interest income will be exempt from taxation (e.g., was received by the institution as a result of its holdings of state or municipal obligations), an amount equal to the tax benefit derived from that component is added back to the net interest income total.  This adjustment is considered helpful in comparing one financial institution’s net interest income (pre-tax) to that of another institution, as each will have a different proportion of tax-exempt items in their portfolios.  Moreover, net interest income is itself a component of a second financial measure commonly used by financial institutions, net interest margin, which is the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets.  For purposes of this measure as well, tax-equivalent net interest income is generally used by financial institutions, again to provide a better basis of comparison from institution to institution.  We follow these practices.

The Efficiency Ratio:  Financial institutions often use an “efficiency ratio” as a measure of expense control.  The efficiency ratio typically is defined as noninterest expense divided by taxable equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income.  As in the case of net interest income, generally, net interest income as utilized in calculating the efficiency ratio is typically expressed on a tax-equivalent basis.  Moreover, most financial institutions, in calculating the efficiency ratio, also adjust both noninterest expense and noninterest income to exclude from these items (as calculated under GAAP) certain component  elements, such as non-recurring charges, and other real estate expense (deducted from noninterest expense) and securities transactions and other non-recurring income items (excluded from noninterest income).  We follow these practices.

3


PART I
 
Item 1.
Business
 
General
 
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (“TrustCo” or the “Company”) is a savings and loan holding company having its principal place of business at 5 Sarnowski Drive, Glenville, New York 12302. TrustCo was incorporated under the laws of New York in 1981 to acquire all of the outstanding stock of Trustco Bank, National Association, formerly known as Trustco Bank New York, and prior to that, The Schenectady Trust Company. On July 28, 2000 TrustCo acquired Landmark Financial Corp. and its subsidiary Landmark Community Bank, in Canajoharie, New York, a federal savings bank with assets of approximately $26 million. Landmark Community Bank was subsequently renamed Trustco Savings Bank, and, on November 15, 2002, Trustco Savings Bank and Trustco Bank, National Association merged under the charter of Trustco Savings Bank. In that merger, the resulting bank changed its name to Trustco Bank (sometimes referred to in this report as the “Bank”).
 
Through policy and practice, TrustCo continues to emphasize that it is an equal opportunity employer. There were 670 full-time equivalent employees of TrustCo at year-end 2007. TrustCo had 14,497 shareholders of record as of December 31, 2007 (the last business day in 2007) and the closing price of the TrustCo common stock on that date was $9.92.
 
Subsidiaries
 
Trustco Bank
 
Trustco Bank is a federal savings bank engaged in providing general banking services to individuals, partnerships, and corporations. The Bank operates 108 automatic teller machines and 107 banking offices in Albany, Columbia, Dutchess, Greene, Orange, Rensselaer, Rockland, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Ulster, Warren, Washington and Westchester counties of New York, Hillsborough, Lake, Orange, Polk, Sarasota, Seminole and Volusia counties in Florida, Bennington County in Vermont, Berkshire County in Massachusetts and Bergen County in New Jersey. The largest part of such business consists of accepting deposits and making loans and investments. The Bank provides a wide range of both personal and business banking services. The Bank is supervised and regulated by the federal Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) and is a member of the Federal Reserve System. Its deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to the extent permitted by law. The Bank established an operating subsidiary, Trustco Vermont Investment Company, in September 2003 for the purposes of holding all of the shares of the capital stock of the Bank’s existing subsidiary, Trustco Realty Corp., that were held by the Bank and of acquiring and managing other investments. Trustco Realty Corp. holds certain mortgage assets that are serviced by the Bank. The Bank accounted for substantially all of TrustCo’s 2007 consolidated net income and average assets.
 
4


The trust department of the Bank serves as executor of estates and trustee of personal trusts, provides asset and wealth management services, provides estate planning and related advice, provides custodial services, and acts as trustee for various types of employee benefit plans and corporate pension and profit sharing trusts. The aggregate market value of the assets under trust, custody, or management of the trust department of the Bank was approximately $916 million as of December 31, 2007.
 
The daily operations of the Bank remain the responsibility of its officers, subject to the oversight of its Board of Directors and overall supervision by TrustCo. The accounts of the Bank are included in TrustCo's consolidated financial statements.
 
ORE Subsidiary
 
In 1993, TrustCo created ORE Subsidiary Corp., a New York corporation, to hold and manage certain foreclosed properties acquired by the Bank. The accounts of this subsidiary are included in TrustCo's consolidated financial statements.
 
Competition
 
TrustCo faces strong competition in its market areas, both in attracting deposits and making loans. The Company’s most direct competition for deposits, historically, has come from commercial banks, savings associations and credit unions that are located or have branches in the Bank’s market areas. The competition ranges from other locally based commercial banks, savings banks and credit unions to branch offices of the largest financial institutions in the United States. In its principal market areas the Capital District area of New York State and Central Florida, TrustCo's principal competitors are local operations of super regional banks, branch offices of money center banks, and locally based commercial and savings banks. The Bank is the largest depository institution headquartered in the Capital District area of New York State. The Company also faces competition for deposits from national brokerage houses, short-term money market funds, and other corporate and government securities funds.
 
Factors affecting the acquisition of deposits include pricing, office locations and hours of operation, the variety of deposit accounts offered, and the quality of customer service provided. Competition for loans has been especially keen during the last several years. Commercial banks, thrift institutions, traditional mortgage brokers affiliated with local offices and nationally franchised real estate brokers are all active and aggressive competitors. The Company competes in this environment by providing a full range of financial services based on a tradition of financial strength and integrity dating from its inception. The Company competes for loans, principally through the interest rates and loan fees it charges, and the efficiency and quality of services it provides to borrowers.
 
Supervision and Regulation
 
Banking is a highly regulated industry, with numerous federal and state laws and regulations governing the organization and operation of banks and their affiliates. As a savings and loan holding company registered under the Home Owners’ Loan Act of 1934 (the "HOLA"), TrustCo is regulated and examined by the OTS. The HOLA requires TrustCo to obtain prior OTS approval for acquisitions and restricts the business operations permitted to TrustCo. The OTS is also the Bank’s primary federal regulator and supervises and examines the Bank.  Because the FDIC provides deposit insurance to the Bank, the Bank is also subject to its supervision and regulation even though the FDIC is not the Bank’s primary federal regulator.
 
5


Most of TrustCo's revenues consist of cash dividends paid to TrustCo by the Bank, payment of which is subject to various regulatory limitations. (Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements contained in TrustCo’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2007 contains information concerning restrictions on TrustCo’s ability to pay dividends and is hereby incorporated by reference.) Compliance with the standards set forth in the OTS rules regarding capital distribution by savings associations and savings banks could also limit the amount of dividends that TrustCo may pay to its shareholders. The banking industry is also affected by the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, which exerts considerable influence over the cost and availability of funds obtained for lending and investing.
 
See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements contained in TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2007, and the discussion under “Federal Savings Institution Regulations – Regulatory Capital Requirements”, which contain information concerning the Bank’s regulatory capital requirements.
 
The following summary of laws and regulations applicable to the Company and the Bank is not intended to be a complete description of those laws and regulations or their effects on the Company and the Bank, and it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions described.
 
Holding Company Activities
 
The activities of savings and loan holding companies are governed by the HOLA. Since TrustCo became a savings and loan holding company in 2002, its activities are limited to those permissible for “multiple” savings and loan holding companies (that is, savings and loan holding companies owning more than one savings association subsidiary) as of March 5, 1987, activities permitted for bank holding companies as of November 12, 1999 and activities permissible for “financial holding companies” (which are described below). “Savings associations” include federal savings banks such as the Bank. TrustCo must obtain approval from the appropriate bank regulatory agencies before acquiring control of any insured depository institution.
 
A savings and loan holding company is prohibited from, directly or indirectly, acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of another financial institution or savings and loan holding company, without prior written approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision and from acquiring or retaining control of a depository institution that is not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings institutions, the Office of Thrift Supervision considers the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the Company and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the deposit insurance funds, the convenience and needs of the community and competitive factors.
 
6


The Office of Thrift Supervision may not approve any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling savings institutions in more than one state, subject to two exceptions: (i) the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies and (ii) the acquisition of a savings institution in another state if the laws of the state of the target savings institution specifically permit such acquisitions. The states vary in the extent to which they permit interstate savings and loan holding company acquisitions.
 
Although savings and loan holding companies are not currently subject to specific capital requirements or specific restrictions on the payment of dividends or other capital distributions, federal regulations do prescribe such restrictions on subsidiary savings institutions as described below. The Bank must notify the Office of Thrift Supervision 30 days before declaring any dividend to the Company. In addition, the financial impact of a holding company on its subsidiary institution is a matter that is evaluated by the Office of Thrift Supervision and the agency has authority to order cessation of activities or divestiture of subsidiaries deemed to pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the institution.
 
Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance
 
The Company’s common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Company is subject to restrictions, reporting requirements and review procedures under federal securities laws and regulations. The Company is also subject to the rules and reporting requirements of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, on which its Common Stock is traded. Like other issuers of publicly traded securities, the Company must also comply with The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley"), which implemented legislative reforms intended to address corporate and accounting fraud and contains reforms of various business practices and numerous aspects of corporate governance. For example, Sarbanes-Oxley addresses accounting oversight and corporate governance matters, including the creation of a five-member oversight board appointed by the Securities and Exchange Commission to set and enforce auditing, quality control and independence standards for accountants and have investigative and disciplinary powers; increased responsibilities and codified requirements relating to audit committees of public companies and how they interact with a company's public accounting firm; the prohibition of accounting firms from providing various types of consulting services to public clients and requiring accounting firms to rotate partners among public client assignments every five years; expanded disclosure of corporate operations and internal controls and certification by chief executive officers and chief financial officers to the accuracy of periodic reports filed with the SEC; and prohibitions on public company insiders from trading during retirement plan "blackout" periods, restrictions on loans to company executives and enhanced controls on and reporting of insider trading.
 
Although the Company has and will continue to incur additional expense in complying with the provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley and the resulting regulations, management does not expect that such compliance will have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.
 
7


Federal Savings Institution Regulation
 
Business Activities. Federal law and regulations govern the activities of federal savings banks such as the Bank. These laws and regulations delineate the nature and extent of the activities in which federal savings banks may engage. In particular, certain lending authority for federal savings banks, e.g., commercial, non-residential real property loans and consumer loans, is limited to a specified percentage of the institution’s capital or assets.
 
Regulatory Capital Requirements. OTS capital regulations require thrifts to satisfy three capital ratio requirements: tangible capital, Tier 1 core (leverage) capital, and risk-based capital. In general, an association’s tangible capital, which must be at least 1.5% of adjusted total assets, is the sum of common shareholders’ equity adjusted for the effects of other comprehensive income (“OCI”), net of the adjustment to record the previously unrecognized overfunded position of employee benefit plans (“OCI”), less goodwill and other disallowed assets. An association’s ratio of Tier 1 core capital to adjusted total assets (the “core capital” or “leverage” ratio) must be at least 3% for the most highly rated associations and 4% for others. Higher capital ratios may be required if warranted by the particular circumstances or risk profile of a given association. Under the risk-based capital requirement, a savings association must have total capital (core capital plus supplementary capital) equal to at least 8% of risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 capital must represent at least 50% of total capital and consists of core capital elements, which include common shareholders’ equity, qualifying noncumulative nonredeemable perpetual preferred stock, and minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, but exclude goodwill and certain other intangible assets. Supplementary capital mainly consists of qualifying subordinated debt and portions of allowance for loan losses.
 
The above capital requirements are viewed as minimum standards by the OTS. The OTS regulations also specify minimum requirements for a savings association to be considered a “well-capitalized institution” as defined in the “prompt corrective action” regulation described below. A “well-capitalized” savings association must have a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 5% or greater.
 
Additionally, to qualify as a “well-capitalized institution,” a savings association’s Tier 1 risk-based capital, defined as core capital plus supplementary capital less portions of the association’s allowance for loan losses, must be equal to at least 6% of risk-weighted assets. The Bank currently meets all of the requirements of a “well-capitalized institution.”
 
The OTS regulations contain prompt corrective action provisions that require certain mandatory remedial actions and authorize certain other discretionary actions to be taken by the OTS against a savings association that falls within specified categories of capital deficiency. The relevant regulations establish five categories of capital classification for this purpose, ranging from “well-capitalized” or “adequately capitalized” through “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized.” In general, the prompt corrective action regulations prohibit an OTS-regulated institution from declaring any dividends, making any other capital distributions, or paying a management fee to a controlling person, such as its parent holding company, if, following the distribution or payment, the institution would be within any of the three undercapitalized categories.
 
8


Insurance of Deposit Accounts. Deposits of Trustco Bank are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC. The FDIC determines insurance premiums based on a number of factors, primarily the risk of loss that insured institutions pose to the DIF. Recent legislation eliminated the minimum 1.25% reserve ratio for the insurance funds, the mandatory assessments when the ratio falls below 1.25% and the prohibition on assessing the highest quality banks when the ratio is above 1.25%. The FDIC has the ability to adjust the new insurance fund’s reserve ratio between 1.15% and 1.5%, depending on projected losses, economic changes and assessment rates at the end of a calendar year. The FDIC has adopted regulations that set assessment rates that took effect at the beginning of 2007. The new assessment rates for most banks vary between five cents and seven cents for every $100 of deposits. A change in insurance premiums could have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of Trustco Bank. The Bank cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future. Assessment credits have been provided to institutions that paid high premiums in the past, and Trustco Bank will have credits of approximately $1.5 million to offset premiums in the future.
 
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC or the OTS. The Bank does not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of its deposit insurance.
 
In addition to the assessment for deposit insurance, institutions are required to make payments on bonds issued in the late 1980s by the Financing Corporation to recapitalize a predecessor deposit insurance fund.
 
Limitation on Capital Distributions. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations impose limitations upon all capital distributions by Trustco Bank, including cash dividends, payments to repurchase its shares and payments to stockholders of another institution in a cash-out merger. Under the regulations, an application to and the prior approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision is required prior to any capital distribution if the institution does not meet the criteria for “expedited treatment” of applications under Office of Thrift Supervision regulations (i.e., generally, examination ratings in the two top categories), the total capital distributions for the calendar year exceed net income for that year plus the amount of retained net income for the preceding two years, the institution would be undercapitalized following the distribution or the distribution would otherwise be contrary to a statute, regulation or agreement with Office of Thrift Supervision. If an application is not required, the institution must still provide prior notice to Office of Thrift Supervision of the capital distribution if, like the Bank, it is a subsidiary of a holding company. In the event the Bank’s capital fell below its regulatory requirements or the Office of Thrift Supervision notified it that it was in need of more than normal supervision, the Bank’s ability to make capital distributions could be restricted. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision could prohibit a proposed capital distribution by any institution, which would otherwise be permitted by the regulation, if the Office of Thrift Supervision determines that such distribution would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.
 
9


Assessments. The Bank is required to pay assessments to the Office of Thrift Supervision to fund the agency’s operations. The general assessments, paid on a semi-annual basis, is computed upon the Bank’s total assets, including consolidated subsidiaries, as reported in the Bank’s latest quarterly thrift financial report. The assessments paid by the Bank for the year ended December 31, 2007 totaled approximately $540 thousand.
 
Community Reinvestment Act. The Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") requires each savings institution, as well as commercial banks and certain other lenders, to identify the communities served by the institution's offices and to identify the types of credit the institution is prepared to extend within those communities. The CRA also requires the OTS to assess an institution's performance in meeting the credit needs of its identified communities as part of its examination of the institution and to take such assessments into consideration in reviewing applications with respect to branches, mergers and other business combinations, including acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies. An unsatisfactory CRA rating may be the basis for denying such an application and community groups have successfully protested applications on CRA grounds. In connection with its assessment of CRA performance, the OTS assigns CRA ratings of "outstanding," "satisfactory," "needs to improve" or "substantial noncompliance." The Bank was rated "satisfactory” in its last CRA examination. Institutions are evaluated based on (i) its record of helping to meet the credit needs of its assessment area through lending activities; (ii) its qualified investments; and (iii) the availability and effectiveness of the institution’s system for delivering retail banking services. An institution that is found to be deficient in its performance in meeting its community's credit needs may be subject to enforcement actions, including cease and desist orders and civil money penalties.
 
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. Like all OTS-regulated institutions, the Bank is required to meet a Qualified Thrift Lender (“QTL”) test or the Internal Revenue Code’s Domestic Building and Loan Association (“DBLA”) test to avoid certain restrictions on its operations, including restrictions on its ability to branch interstate and the Company’s mandatory registration as a savings and loan holding company under the Act. A savings association satisfies the QTL test if: (i) on a monthly average basis in at least nine months out of each twelve month period, at least 65% of a specified asset base of the savings association consists of loans to small businesses, credit card loans, educational loans, or certain assets related to domestic residential real estate, including residential mortgage loans and mortgage securities; or (ii) at least 60% of the savings association’s total assets consist of cash, U.S. government or government agency debt or equity securities, fixed assets, or loans secured by deposits, real property used for residential, educational, church, welfare, or health purposes, or real property in certain urban renewal areas. To be a QTL under the DBLA test, a savings association must meet a “business operations test” and a “60 percent of assets test.” The business operations test requires the business of a DBLA to consist primarily of acquiring the savings of the public and investing in loans. An institution meets the public savings requirement when it meets one of two conditions: (i) the institution acquires its savings accounts in conformity with OTS rules and regulations and (ii) the general public holds more than 75 percent of its deposits, withdrawable shares, and other obligations. An institution meets the investing in loans requirement when more than 75 percent of its gross income consists of interest on loans and government obligations, and various other specified types of operating income that financial institutions ordinarily earn. The 60 percent of assets test requires that at least 60 percent of a DBLA's assets must consist of assets that thrifts normally hold, except for consumer loans that are not educational loans. The Bank is currently, and expects to remain, in compliance with these standards.
 
10


Federal Reserve System
 
Federal Reserve Board regulations require savings institutions to maintain non-interest bearing reserves against their transaction accounts. The reserve for transaction accounts as of December 31, 2007 was as follows:
 
Amount of transaction accounts
Reserve Requirement
$0 to $9.3 million
0 percent of amount.
Over $9.3 million and up to $43.9 million
3 percent of amount.
Over $43.9 million
$1,317,000 plus 10 percent of amount over $43.9 million.
 
The Bank is in compliance with these requirements as of December 31, 2007.
 
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Privacy Requirements
 
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the "GLB Act") generally provided for sweeping financial modernization for commercial banks, savings banks, securities firms, insurance companies, and other financial institutions operating in the United States. Among other matters, the GLB Act established a federal right to the confidential treatment of nonpublic personal information about consumers. These provisions of the GLB Act require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, will allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a nonaffiliated third party. Compliance with the rules was mandatory starting on July 1, 2001. These rules affect how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial companies and conveyed to outside vendors. Because the Company does not sell customer information or give customer information to outside third parties or its affiliates except under very limited circumstances (e.g., providing customer information to the Company's data processing provider), the rules have not had a significant impact on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
On July 30, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s stated goals include enhancing corporate responsibility, increasing penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies and protecting investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act generally applies to all companies that file or are required to file periodic reports with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
 
11


Among other things, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act creates the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board as an independent body subject to SEC supervision with responsibility for setting auditing, quality control and ethical standards for auditors of public companies. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act also requires public companies to make faster and more extensive financial disclosures, requires the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of public companies to provide signed certifications as to the accuracy and completeness of financial information filed with the SEC, and provides enhanced criminal and civil penalties for violations of the federal securities laws.
 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act also addresses functions and responsibilities of audit committees of public companies. The statute makes the audit committee directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the company’s outside auditor, and requires the auditor to report directly to the audit committee. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act authorizes each audit committee to engage independent counsel and other advisors, and requires a public company to provide the appropriate funding, as determined by its audit committee, to pay the company’s auditors and any advisors that its audit committee retains. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act also requires public companies to include an internal control report and assessment by management, along with an attestation to this report prepared by the company’s registered public accounting firm, in their annual reports to stockholders.
 
The Company expects to incur additional expense in complying with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the resulting regulations.
 
Other Legislation
 
The USA PATRIOT Act ("Patriot Act"), which was enacted in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, adopted numerous provisions designed to fight international money laundering and to block terrorist access to the U.S. financial system. Under Title III of the Patriot Act, also known as the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act of 2001, all financial institutions, including the Company and the Bank, are required to take certain measures to identify their customers, prevent money laundering, monitor certain customer transactions and report suspicious activity to U.S. law enforcement agencies, and scrutinize or prohibit altogether certain transactions of special concern. Financial institutions also are required to respond to requests for information from federal banking regulatory agencies and law enforcement agencies concerning their customers and their transactions. Information-sharing among financial institutions concerning terrorist or money laundering activities is encouraged by an exemption provided from the privacy provisions of the GLB Act and other laws. Further, the effectiveness of a financial institution in combating money laundering activities is a factor to be considered in applications submitted by a financial institution under the Bank Merger Act. The Company has in place a Bank Secrecy Act compliance program, and it engages in very few transactions of any kind with foreign financial institutions or foreign persons.
 
12


The Company operates a wholly owned real estate investment trust (“REIT”) subsidiary, which was formed to acquire, hold and manage real estate mortgage assets, including, but not limited to residential mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities. The income earned on these assets, net of expenses, is distributed in the form of dividends. Under current New York State tax law, 60% of the dividends received from the REIT are excluded from total taxable income.
 
The proposed 2008 New York State budget bill contains a provision that would potentially increase the amount of state tax paid by the Company. The bill, if enacted as proposed, would be effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2008.
 
Foreign Operations
 
Neither TrustCo nor the Bank engage in any operations in foreign countries or have outstanding loans to foreign debtors.
 
Statistical Information Analysis
 
The "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" are included in TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2007, which contains a presentation and discussion of statistical data relating to TrustCo, is hereby incorporated by reference. This information should not be construed to imply any conclusion on the part of the management of TrustCo that the results, causes, or trends indicated therein will continue in the future. The nature and effects of governmental monetary policy, supervision and regulation, future legislation, inflation and other economic conditions and many other factors which affect interest rates, investments, loans, deposits, and other aspects of TrustCo's operations are extremely complex and could make historical operations, earnings, assets, and liabilities not indicative of what may occur in the future.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
Pursuant to recent SEC guidance, management of the Company is encouraged to evaluate and disclose those accounting policies that are judged to be critical policies, or those most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, and that require management’s most difficult subjective or complex judgments. Management considers the accounting policy relating to the allowance for loan losses to be a critical accounting policy given the inherent subjectivity and uncertainty in estimating the levels of the allowance required to cover the inherent risk of loss in the portfolio and the material effect that such judgments can have on the results of operations. Included in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements contained in TrustCo’s Annual Report to Shareholders is a description of this critical policy and the other significant accounting policies that are utilized by the Company in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
13


Availability of Reports
 
This annual report on Form 10-K and subsequently filed quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge from our Internet site, www.trustcobank.com.
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
Statements included in the “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2007 and in future filings by TrustCo with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in TrustCo's press releases, and in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer which are not historical or current facts are "forward-looking statements" made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected. TrustCo wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The following important factors, among others, in some cases have affected and in the future could affect TrustCo's actual results and could cause TrustCo's actual financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in any forward-looking statement: (i) credit risk; (ii) interest rate risk; (iii) competition; (iv) changes in the regulatory environment; and (v) changes in local market area and general business and economic trends. The foregoing list should not be construed as exhaustive and the Company disclaims any obligation to subsequently revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
 
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
 
These are general risk factors affecting the Company. They are further described under Item 1. “Business” and in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business operations. Any of these risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. In such cases, you may lose all or part of your investment.
 
Certain interest rate movements may hurt earnings and asset value.
 
Interest rates have in recent years hit historical low levels. However, from June 2004 to June 2006, the U.S. Federal Reserve increased its target for the federal funds rate from 1.00% to 5.25%. Beginning in September 2007, its target federal funds rate has been reduced and ended 2007 at 4.25%. While these short-term market interest rates (which are used as a guide to price the Bank’s deposits) have fluctuated, longer-term market interest rates (which are used as a guide to price the Bank’s longer-term loans) have not changed in a similar fashion. This “flattening” of the market yield curve has had a negative impact on the Bank’s interest rate spread and net interest margin to date, and if short-term interest rates continue to rise, and if rates on the Bank’s deposits and borrowings continue to reprice upwards faster than rates on the Bank’s long-term loans and investments, the Bank would experience further compression of its interest rate spread and net interest margin, which would have a negative effect on the Bank’s profitability.
 
14


Changes in interest rates also affect the value of the Bank’s interest-earning assets, and in particular the Bank’s securities portfolio. Generally, the value of fixed-rate securities fluctuates inversely with changes in interest rates. Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale are reported as a separate component of equity, net of tax. Decreases in the fair value of securities available for sale resulting from increases in interest rates could have an adverse effect on shareholders’ equity.
 
Changes in interest rates effecting the value of the Company’s trading portfolio are recorded through the consolidated statements of income.  Therefore changes in interest rates will have a direct impact on recorded net income.
 
Impact of Liquidity and Credit Concerns
 
The Company’s operations are effected by National trends and concerns with respect to liquidity and credit risk.  The ability of the Company to trade investment securities is somewhat contingent upon a ready market place for such securities.  Therefore the Company experiences risk as a result of the changing credit and liquidity operating environment.
 
Strong competition within the Bank’s market areas could hurt profits and slow growth.
 
The Bank faces intense competition both in making loans and attracting deposits. This competition has made it more difficult for the Bank to make new loans and at times has forced the Bank to offer higher deposit rates. Price competition for loans and deposits might result in the Bank earning less on loans and paying more on deposits, which would reduce net interest income. Competition also makes it more difficult to grow loans and deposits and to hire and retain experienced employees. Some of the institutions with which the Bank competes have substantially greater resources and lending limits than the Bank has and may offer services that the Bank does not provide. Management expects competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. The Bank’s profitability depends upon its continued ability to compete successfully in its market area.
 
We are exposed to credit risk in our lending activities.
 
There are inherent risks associated with our lending and trading activities. Loans to individuals and business entities, our single largest asset group, depend for repayment on the willingness and ability of borrowers to perform as contracted. A material adverse change in the ability of a significant portion of our borrowers to meet their obligation to us, due to changes in economic conditions, interest rates, natural disaster, acts of war, or other causes over which we have no control, could adversely impact the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans or the value of the collateral securing these loans, and could have a material adverse impact on our earnings and financial condition.
 
15


The Company operates in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in laws, regulations and tax policies.
 
As described earlier, the Bank is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the Office of Thrift Supervision, its primary federal regulator, and by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as insurer of our deposits. In addition, the Company is subject to regulation and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision. Such regulation and supervision govern the activities in which an institution and its holding company may engage and are intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and the depositors and borrowers of the Bank rather than for holders of the Company’s common stock. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on operations, the classification of the Bank’s assets and determination of the level of allowance for loan losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, legislation or supervisory action, may have a material impact on operations.
 
Likewise, the Company operates in an environment that imposes income taxes on its operations at both the federal and state levels to varying degrees. Strategies and operating routines have been implemented to minimize the impact of these taxes.
 
Consequently, any change in tax legislation could significantly alter the effectiveness of these strategies.
 
Negative events in certain geographic areas could adversely affect us.
 
Negative conditions in the real estate markets where collateral for our mortgage loans is located could adversely affect our borrower’s ability to repay and the value of the collateral. Real estate values are affected by various factors, including changes in general or regional economic conditions, governmental rules or policies and natural disasters such as hurricanes.
 
We are dependent upon the services of our management team.
 
We are dependent upon the ability and experience of a number of our key management personnel who have substantial experience with our operations, the financial services industry and the markets in which we offer our services. It is possible that the loss of the services of one or more of our senior executives or key managers would have an adverse effect on our operations. Our success also depends on our ability to continue to attract, manage and retain other qualified middle management personnel as we grow. We cannot assure you that we will continue to attract or retain such personnel.
 
16


Provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws and New York law may discourage or prevent takeover attempts, and these provisions may have the effect of reducing the market price of our stock.
 
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws include several provisions that may have the effect of discouraging or preventing hostile takeover attempts, and therefore, making the removal of incumbent management difficult. The provisions include staggered terms for our board of directors and requirements of supermajority votes to approve certain business transactions. In addition, New York law contains several provisions that may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us without the approval of the board of directors, and may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding stock. To the extent that these provisions are effective in discouraging or preventing takeover attempts, they may tend to reduce the market price for our stock.
 
Changes in accounting standards could impact reported earnings.
 
The accounting standard setting bodies, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulatory bodies, periodically change financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our consolidated statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how the Company records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised accounting standard retroactively, which could effect beginning of period financial statement amounts.
 
Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.
 
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed by First Financial in reports we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
 
These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
 
17


The preparation of financial statements requires the use of estimates that may vary from actual results.
 
Preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles accepted in the United States of America requires management to make significant estimates that affect the financial statements. One of our most critical estimates is the level of the allowance for loan losses. Due to the inherent nature of this estimate, we cannot provide absolute assurance that we will not significantly increase the allowance for loan losses higher than the current balance.
 
We rely on communications, information, operating and financial control systems, and technology from third-party service providers, and we may suffer an interruption in those systems that may result in lost business. Further, we may not be able to substitute providers on terms that are as favorable if our relationships with our existing service providers are interrupted.
 
We rely heavily on third-party service providers for much of our communications, information, operating and financial controls systems, and technology. Any failure or interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or interruptions in our customer relationships management, general ledger, deposit, servicing and/or loan origination systems. We cannot assure you that such failures or interruptions will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed by us or the third parties on which we rely. The occurrence of any failure or interruption could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. If any of our third-party service providers experience financial, operational or technological difficulties, or if there is any other disruption in our relationships with them, we may be required to locate alternative sources of such services, and we cannot assure you that we could negotiate terms that are as favorable to us, or could obtain services with similar functionality as found in our existing systems, without the need to expend substantial resources, if at all. Any of these circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
 
If the business continuity and disaster recovery plans that we have in place are not adequate to continue our operations in the event of a disaster, the business disruption can adversely impact our operations.
 
External events, including terrorist or military actions, or an outbreak of disease, such as Asian Influenza, or “bird flu” and resulting political and social turmoil could cause unforeseen damage to our physical facilities or could cause delays or disruptions to operational functions, including information processing and financial market settlement functions. Additionally, our customers, vendors and counterparties could suffer from such events. Should these events affect us, or our customers, or vendors or counterparties with which we conduct business, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
 
18


Decline in home values in the Company’s markets could adversely impact results from operations.
 
Like all financial services providers, the Company is subject to the effects of any economic downturn, and in particular, a significant decline in home values in the Company’s markets could have a negative effect on the results of operations. A significant decline in home values would likely lead to a decrease in new home equity loan originations and increased delinquencies and defaults in both the consumer home equity loan and the residential real estate loan portfolios and result in increased losses in these portfolios.
 
There was significant disruption and volatility in the financial and capital markets during the second half of 2007.  Turmoil in the mortgage market adversely impacted both domestic and global markets and led to a significant global credit and liquidity crisis.  These market conditions were attributed to a variety of factors, in particular the fallout associated with subprime mortgage loans (a type of lending we have never actively pursued).  The disruption has been exacerbated by the continued decline of the real estate and housing market.  While we continue to adhere to prudent underwriting standards and do not participate in subprime lending.  The geographic markets in which we operate may not be immune to some negative consequences arising from overall economic weakness and in particular, a downturn in the housing market nationally.  Decreases in real estate values could adversely affect the value of property used as collateral for our loans.  Adverse changes in the economy may have a negative effect on the ability of our borrowers to make timely loan payments, which would have an adverse impact on our earnings.
 
Item 1B
Unresolved Staff Comments
 
None.
 
Item 2.
Properties
 
TrustCo's executive offices are located at 5 Sarnowski Drive, Glenville, New York, 12302. The Company operates 107 offices, of which 23 are owned and 84 are leased from others. The asset value of these properties, when considered in the aggregate, is not material to the operation of TrustCo.
 
In the opinion of management, the physical properties of TrustCo and the Bank are suitable and adequate and are being fully utilized.
 
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
 
The nature of TrustCo's business generates a certain amount of litigation against TrustCo and its subsidiaries involving matters arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management of TrustCo, there are no proceedings pending to which TrustCo or any of its subsidiaries is a party, or of which its property is the subject which, if determined adversely to TrustCo or such subsidiaries, would be material in relation to TrustCo's consolidated shareholders' equity and financial condition.
 
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
 
None.
 
19


Executive Officers of TrustCo

The following is a list of the names and ages of the executive officers of TrustCo and their business history for the past five years:


Name, Age and Position With Trustco
 
Principal Occupations Or Employment Since January 1, 2002
 
Year First Became Executive of TrustCo
         
Robert J. McCormick, Age 44,
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
President and Chief Executive Officer of TrustCo since January 2004, Executive Officer of TrustCo since 2001 and President and Chief Executive Officer of Trustco Bank since November 2002. Director of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2005. Robert J. McCormick is the son of Robert A. McCormick. Joined Trustco Bank in 1995.
 
2000
         
Robert T. Cushing, Age 52,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TrustCo since January 2004, President and Chief Executive Officer of TrustCo from November 2002 to December 2003; Executive Officer of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 1994. Joined Trustco Bank in 1994.
 
1994
         
Scot R. Salvador, Age 41,
Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since January 2004. Executive Officer of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2004. Joined Trustco Bank in 1995.
 
2004
         
Thomas M. Poitras, Age 45,
Vice President and Secretary
 
Secretary of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2005. Vice President of Trustco Bank since 2001 and Executive Officer of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2005. Joined Trustco Bank in 1986.
 
2005
         
Robert M. Leonard, Age 45,
Administrative Vice President and Assistant Secretary
 
Assistant Secretary of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2003. Administrative Vice President of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2004. Executive Officer of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2003. Joined Trustco Bank in 1986.
 
2003
         
Sharon J. Parvis, Age 57,
Vice President and Assistant Secretary
 
Assistant Secretary of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2005. Vice President of Trustco Bank since 1996 and Executive Officer of TrustCo and Trustco Bank since 2005. Joined Trustco Bank in 1987.
 
2005

Each executive officer is elected by the Board of Directors to serve until election of his successor.

20


PART II
 
Item 5.                      Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
TrustCo’s common stock is traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC under the symbol “TRST.” Information with respect to the range of high and low sales prices for TrustCo’s common stock, and with respect to the frequency and amount of cash dividends declared on the common stock, is set forth on page [1] of TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2007. TrustCo had 14,384 shareholders of record as of February 22, 2008, and the closing price of TrustCo's common stock on that date was $9.32.
 
The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2007, regarding securities authorized for issuance under TrustCo’s equity compensation plans.
 
Plan category
 
Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
 
(a)
   
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants and rights
 
(b)
   
Number of
securities
remaining
available for future
issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))
 
(c)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
    4,416,777     $ 10.92       598,500  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 
None
   
None
   
None
 
Total
    4,416,777     $ 10.92       598,500  

The following table provides information with respect to purchases of shares of TrustCo’s common stock made by or on behalf of TrustCo in the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2007.

21


Purchases of Equity Securities
 
2007
Period
 
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
 
Average
Price
Paid per
Share
 
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
 
Maximum
Number
Of Shares
That May
Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or Programs
 
October 1-31
0
0
0
N/A
November 1-30
0
0
0
N/A
December 1-31
0
0
0
N/A
Total
0
0
0
N/A
 
In the TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2007, which is filed as Exhibit 13 hereto, contains a graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the Company’s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative return of the Russell 2000 and the SNL Superregional Banks. Such graph is incorporated herein by reference.
 
No shares were purchased through a publicly announced plan or program. Previously purchases have been made in open-market transactions to provide shares for issuance upon exercise of outstanding stock options issued by the Company and to provide shares for issuance under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan.
 
Item 6.                  Selected Financial Data
 
TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2007, which is filed as Exhibit 13 hereto, is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 7.                  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2007, which is filed as Exhibit 13 hereto, are incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 7A.               Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
TrustCo’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2007, which is filed as Exhibit 13 hereto, are incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 8.                  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
The consolidated financial statements, together with the report thereon of KPMG LLP included in the TrustCo's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2007, which is filed as Exhibit 13 hereto, are incorporated herein by reference.

22


Item 9.                  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
None.
 
Item 9A.               Controls and Procedures
 
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as this Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to satisfy the objectives for which they are designed.
 
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, together with the report thereon of KPMG LLP, is included in TrustCo’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2007, which is filed as Exhibit 13 hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
 
Subsequent to the date of Management’s evaluation and since September 30, 2007, there were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls, including internal controls over financial reporting, or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
Item 9B.               Other Information
 
None.
 
PART III
 
Item 10.                Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
The information in TrustCo's Proxy Statement filed for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 19, 2008 under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference: "Information on TrustCo Directors and Nominees" and "Information on TrustCo Executive Officers", and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance". TrustCo has adopted a code of conduct that applies to all employees, including its principal executive, financial and accounting officers. A copy of this code of conduct will be provided without charge upon written request. Requests and inquiries should be directed to: Robert M. Leonard, Administrative Vice President, TrustCo Bank Corp NY, P.O. Box 1082, Schenectady, New York 12301-1082. The required information regarding TrustCo's executive officers is contained in PART I in the item captioned "Executive Officers of TrustCo."

23


Under rules adopted by the SEC, TrustCo is required to disclose whether it has an “audit committee financial expert” serving on its Audit Committee. The Board has determined that none of the members of the Audit Committee meet the definition of “audit committee financial expert” as defined in those rules. The Board believes that in order to fulfill all the functions of the Board and the Audit Committee, each member of the Board and the Audit Committee should meet all the criteria that have been established by the Board for Board membership and that it is not in the best interests of the Company to nominate as a director someone who does not have all the experience, attributes and qualifications that TrustCo seeks. Further, the Board believes that the present members of the Audit Committee have sufficient knowledge and experience in financial affairs to effectively perform their duties.
 
TrustCo’s Audit Committee consists of five non-employee directors, each of whom has been selected for the Audit Committee by the Board based on a determination that they are fully qualified to monitor the performance of management, the public disclosures by the Company of its financial condition and performance, the Company’s internal accounting operations and our independent auditors. Members of the committee include William D. Powers (Chairman), Joseph Lucarelli, Thomas O. Maggs, Anthony J. Marinello, M.D.,Ph.D., and William J. Purdy.  The Audit Committee has the ability on its own to retain independent accountants or other consultants whenever it deems appropriate, and has, in fact, retained Marvin & Co., an independent accounting firm, as a consultant to the committee. Further, the Audit Committee receives directly or has access to extensive information from reviews and examinations by the Company's internal auditor, independent auditor and the various banking regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over the Company and its subsidiaries.
 
Item 11.                Executive Compensation
 
The information under the captions "TrustCo and Trustco Bank Executive Officer Compensation" and "TrustCo Retirement Plans" included in TrustCo's Proxy Statement filed for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 19, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 12.                Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
The information under the captions "Information on TrustCo Directors and Nominees," and "Information on TrustCo Executive Officers," and "Ownership Of TrustCo Common Stock By Certain Beneficial Owners" in TrustCo's Proxy Statement filed for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 19, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference. Additional information concerning the Company’s equity compensation plan is set forth in Item 5 hereof.
 
Item 13.                Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
 
The information under the caption "Transactions with TrustCo and Trustco Bank Directors, Executive Officers and Associates" included in TrustCo's Proxy Statement filed for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 19, 2008 is incorporated herein by reference.

24


Item 14.                Principal Accountant Fees and Services
 
The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) for the 2007 and 2006 audits of TrustCo’s annual consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, and fees billed for other services provided by KPMG during 2007 and 2006.
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
Audit Fees
  $ 399,000     $ 340,000  
Audit Related Fees(1)
    15,000       12,000  
Tax Fees(2)
    255,290       117,600  
All Other Fees(3)
    68,800       87,950  
Total Fees
  $ 738,090     $ 557,550  

 (1) For 2007 and 2006, audit related fees included audit and accounting related services.
 
(2) For 2007 tax fees consisted of tax return preparation services, and tax advice, such as assistance with tax audits. For 2006, tax fees included tax return preparation and other tax compliance services.
 
(3) For 2007, all other fees consisted of accounting research and consultation on emerging accounting standards and tax planning services. For 2006, all other fees included tax planning services.
 
It is the Audit Committee is policy to preapprove all audit and nonaudit services provided by the Company’s independent auditors. In certain circumstances the chairman has authority to preapprove services form the Company’s independent accountants, which are then reviewed and approved at the next Audit Committee meeting. As such, all of the services described above were approved by the Audit Committee.
 
PART IV
 
Item 15.                Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
 
The following financial statements of TrustCo and its consolidated subsidiaries, and the accountants' report thereon are filed as a part of this report.
 
Consolidated Statements of Condition -- December 31, 2007 and 2006.
 
Consolidated Statements of Income -- Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity -- Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.

25


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -- Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Financial Statement Schedules
 
Not Applicable. All required schedules for TrustCo and its subsidiaries have been included in the consolidated financial statements or related notes thereto.
 
Supplementary Financial Information
 
Summary of Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
 
The following exhibits are incorporated herein by reference:*
 
Exhibit No.
 
Description
     
3(i)
 
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated July 27, 1993, as amended.
     
3(ii)
 
Amended and Restated Bylaws of TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated February 20, 2007
     
10(a)
 
Amended and Restated Trust For Deferred Benefits Provided under Employment Agreements of Trustco Bank, National Association and TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated September 18, 2001.
     
10(b)
 
Amended and Restated Trust Under Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans of Trustco Bank, National Association and TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated September 18, 2001.
     
10(c)
 
Amended and Restated Trustco Bank, National Association and TrustCo Bank Corp NY Supplemental Retirement Plan, dated September 18, 2001.
     
10(d)
 
Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Performance Bonus Plan, dated September 18, 2001.
     
10(e)
 
Amended and Restated Trustco Bank, National Association Executive Officer Incentive Plan, dated September 18, 2001.
     
10(f)
 
Amended and Restated Employment Agreements Between Trustco Bank, National Association, TrustCo Bank Corp NY and each of Robert T. Cushing and Robert J. McCormick dated September 18, 2001.
     
10(g)
 
Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY 1995 Stock Option Plan, dated September 18, 2001.

26

 
10(h)
 
Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, dated September 18, 2001.
     
10(i)
 
Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Performance Bonus Plan, dated September 18, 2001.
     
 10(j)
 
Amended and Restated Trustco Bank, National Association Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, dated September 18, 2001.
     
10(k)
 
Consulting Agreement Between TrustCo Bank Corp NY and Robert A. McCormick, dated October 11, 2002.
     
10(l)
 
Amendment No.1 to Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Performance Bonus Plan, dated November 25, 2003.
     
10(m)
 
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Trustco Bank, TrustCo Bank Corp NY and Scot R. Salvador, dated January 1, 2004.
     
10(n)
 
Service Bureau Processing Agreement by and between Fidelity Information Services, Inc. and TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated March 3, 2004.
     
10(o)
 
Master Service Agreement by and between Sungard Wealth Management Services, LLC and TrustCo Bank Corp NY dated April 1, 2004 (portions omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment).
     
10(p)
 
2004 TrustCo Directors Stock Option Plan
     
10(q)
 
2004 TrustCo Stock Option Plan
     
10(r)
 
2005 Amended and Restated Trustco Bank Deferred Compensation Plans for Directors, dated December 20, 2005.
     
10(s)
 
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated 1995 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 20, 2005.
     
10(t)
 
Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated 1995 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005.
     
10(u)
 
Amendment No. 1 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 20, 2005.
     
10(v)
 
Amendment No. 2 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005.
     
10(w)
 
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005.
     
10(x)
 
Amendment No. 1 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005.

27

 
10(y)
 
Restatement of Trustco Bank Senior Incentive Plan dated January 1, 2006.
     
10(z)
 
Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated Trustco Bank Executive Officer Incentive Plan.
     
11
 
Computation of Net Income Per Common Share.
________________
*The exhibits included under Exhibit 10 constitute all management contracts, compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit to this form pursuant to Item 15 of this report.

28


  The following exhibits are filed herewith:
 
Exhibit No.
 
Description
     
13
 
Portions of Annual Report to Security Holders of TrustCo for the year ended December 31, 2007.
     
21
 
List of Subsidiaries of TrustCo.
     
23
 
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
     
24
 
Power of Attorney.
     
31(i)(a)
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Robert J. McCormick, principal executive officer.
     
31(i)(b)
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Robert T. Cushing, principal financial officer.
     
32
 
Section 1350 Certifications of Robert J. McCormick, principal executive officer and Robert T. Cushing, principal financial officer.

29


SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
TrustCo Bank Corp NY
 
   
By:
/s/ Robert T. Cushing
 
 
Robert T. Cushing
 
 
Executive Vice President and
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
     
Date:
February 28, 2008
 

30


Signatures
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
 
Name and Signature
 
Title
 
Date
         
/s/ Robert J. McCormick
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
February 19, 2008
Robert J. McCormick
 
(principal executive officer)
   
       
 
/s/ Robert T. Cushing
 
Executive Vice President and Chief
 
February 19, 2008
Robert T. Cushing
 
Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
   
         
*
 
Director
 
February 19, 2008
Joseph Lucarelli
       
         
*
 
Director
 
February 19, 2008
Thomas O. Maggs
       
         
*
 
Director
 
February 19, 2008
Dr. Anthony J. Marinello
       
         
*
 
Director
 
February 19, 2008
Robert A. McCormick
       
         
*
 
Director
 
February 19, 2008
William D. Powers
       
         
*
 
Director
 
February 19, 2008
William J. Purdy
       

 
* By:
/s/ Thomas Poitras
 
   
Thomas Poitras, as Agent
 
   
Pursuant to Power of Attorney
 

31


Exhibit Index


Exhibit No.
 
Description
     
3(i)
 
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TrustCo Bank Corp NY, as amended, incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 3(i)a to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
     
3(ii)
 
Amended and Restated Bylaws of TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated February 20, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Report on Form 8-K, filed February 20, 2007.
     
10(a)
 
Amended and Restated Trust For Deferred Benefits Provided under Employment Agreements of Trustco Bank, National Association and TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated September 18, 2001 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
     
10(b)
 
Amended and Restated Trust Under Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans of Trustco Bank, National Association and TrustCo Bank Corp NY, dated September 18, 2001, incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(c) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
     
10(c)
 
Amended and Restated Trustco Bank, National Association and TrustCo Bank Corp NY Supplemental Retirement Plan, dated September 18, 2001 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(f) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
     
10(d)
 
Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Performance Bonus Plan, dated September 18, 2001 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(g) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
     
10(e)
 
Amended and Restated Trustco Bank, National Association Executive Officer Incentive Plan, dated September 18, 2001 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(h) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
     
10(f)
 
Amended and Restated Employment Agreements Between Trustco Bank, National Association, TrustCo Bank Corp NY and each of Robert T. Cushing and Robert J. McCormick dated September 18, 2001 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(i) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.

32


Exhibit Index

 
10(g)
 
Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY 1995 Stock Option Plan, dated September 18, 2001 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(k) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
     
10(h)
 
Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, dated September 18, 2001 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(l) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
     
10(i)
 
Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Performance Bonus Plan, dated September 18, 2001 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(m) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
     
10(j)
 
Amended and Restated Trustco Bank Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, dated September 18, 2001 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(n) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.
     
 10(k)
 
Consulting Agreement Between TrustCo Bank Corp NY and Robert A. McCormick, dated October 11, 2002 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(a) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
     
10(l)
 
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Performance Bonus Plan, dated November 25, 2003 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(m) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2003.
     
10(m)
 
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Trustco Bank, TrustCo Bank Corp NY, and Scot R. Salvador, dated January 1, 2004 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(a) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
     
10(n)
 
Service Bureau Processing Agreement by and between Fidelity Information Services, Inc. and TrustCo Bank Corp NY dated March 3, 2004 incorporated by reference to, Exhibit 10(b) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
     
10(o)
 
Master Service Agreement by and between Sungard Wealth Management Services, LLC and TrustCo Bank Corp NY dated April 1, 2004 (portions omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.

33


Exhibit Index

 
10(p)
 
2004 TrustCo Directors Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-115689), filed May 20, 2004).
     
10(q)
 
2004 TrustCo Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-115674), filed May 20, 2004).
     
10(r)
 
2005 Amended and Restated Trustco Bank Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, dated December 20, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(s) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
     
10(s)
 
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated 1995 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 20, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(v) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
     
10(t)
 
Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated 1995 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
     
10(u)
 
Amendment No. 1 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 20, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(x) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
     
10(v)
 
Amendment No. 2 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(y) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
     
10(w)
 
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(z) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
     
10(x)
 
Amendment No. 1 to 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Directors Stock Option Plan, dated December 28, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(aa) to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
     
10(y)
 
Restatement of Trustco Bank Senior Incentive Plan dated January 1, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to TrustCo Bank Corp ’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.

34

 
Exhibit Index
 
10(z)
 
Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated Trustco Bank Executive Officer Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s Report on Form 8-K, filed December 19, 2006.
     
11
 
Computation of Net Income Per Common Share. Note 13  of TrustCo’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2007 is incorporated herein by reference.
     
 
Portions of Annual Report to Security Holders of TrustCo for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed herewith.
     
 
List of Subsidiaries of TrustCo, filed herewith.
     
 
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed herewith.
     
 
Power of Attorney, filed herewith.
     
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Robert J. McCormick, principal executive officer, filed herewith.
     
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Robert T. Cushing, principal financial officer, filed herewith.
     
 
Section 1350 Certifications of Robert J. McCormick, principal executive officer and Robert T. Cushing, principal financial officer, filed herewith.

35

 
  GRAPHICS APPENDIX
 
Omitted Charts
 
Cross Reference to
Page of Annual Report
1
Taxable Equivalent Net Interest Income
8
2
Efficiency Ratio
22
 
The charts listed above were omitted from the EDGAR version of Exhibit 13; however, the information depicted in the charts was adequately discussed and/or displayed in the tabular information within Management's Discussion and Analysis section of the Annual Report.
 
 
36

 
EX-13 2 ex13.htm EXHIBIT 13 ex13.htm

 
 

 

TrustCo Bank Corp NY (the “Company,” “TrustCo” or the “Bank”) is a savings and loan holding company headquartered in Glenville, New York. The Company is the largest financial services company headquartered in the Capital Region of New York State and its principal subsidiary, Trustco Bank, operates 107 community banking offices and 108 Automatic Teller Machines throughout the Bank’s market areas. The Company serves 5 states and 24 counties with a broad range of community banking services.

Financial Highlights
 
                   
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
Years ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
Percent Change
 
Income:
                 
Net interest income (taxable equivalent)
  $ 99,504       101,370       -1.84 %
Net Income
    39,467       45,325       -12.92 %
Per Share:
                       
Basic earnings
    0.525       0.605       -13.22 %
Diluted earnings
    0.525       0.603       -12.94 %
Tangible book value
    3.14       3.19       -1.57 %
Average Balances:
                       
Assets
    3,297,881       2,973,952       10.89 %
Loans, net
    1,852,310       1,611,355       14.95 %
Deposits
    2,945,642       2,628,338       12.07 %
Shareholders' equity
    233,158       230,259       1.26 %
Financial Ratios:
                       
Return on average assets
    1.20
%
    1.52       -21.05 %
Return on average equity (1)
    17.19       18.71       -8.12 %
Consolidated tier 1 capital to:
                       
Total average assets (leverage)
    6.80       7.67       -11.34 %
Risk-adjusted assets
    13.53       14.88       -9.07 %
Total capital to risk-adjusted assets
    14.79       16.14       -8.36 %
Net loans charged off (recovered) to average loans
    0.19       (0.09 )     -311.11 %
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
    2.7
x
    5.0 x     -46.00 %
Efficiency ratio
    45.45
%
    42.03       -8.14 %
Dividend Payout ratio
    121.79       105.70       15.22 %

Per Share information of common stock
 
                     
Tangible
   
Range of Stock
 
   
Basic
   
Diluted
   
Cash
   
Book
   
Price
 
   
Earnings
   
Earnings
   
Dividend
   
Value
   
High
   
Low
 
                                     
2007
                                   
First quarter
  $ 0.164       0.164       0.160       3.20       11.45       9.58  
Second quarter
    0.108       0.108       0.160       3.06       10.15       9.15  
Third quarter
    0.142       0.141       0.160       3.12       11.67       9.14  
Fourth quarter
    0.112       0.111       0.160       3.14       11.50       9.53  
                                                 
2006
                                               
First quarter
    0.165       0.164       0.160       2.96       13.00       11.88  
Second quarter
    0.166       0.165       0.160       2.86       12.30       10.50  
Third quarter
    0.149       0.149       0.160       3.03       11.25       10.40  
Fourth quarter
    0.125       0.125       0.160       3.19       11.48       10.59  
   
   
(1) Excludes the effect of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
 

 
 

 



Table of Contents

Financial Highlights
1
President’s Message
4
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
6
Average Balances, Yields and Net Interest Margins
13
Glossary of Terms
26
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
27
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
28 - 29
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
30
Branch Locations
49-50
Officers and Board of Directors
51
General Information
52
Share Price Information
53


TrustCo Mission Statement:
TrustCo will be the low cost provider of high quality services to our customers in the communities we serve and return to our owners an above average return on their investment.

 
 

 
 
President’s Message

Dear Shareholder:
 
As expected 2007 was a year of growth and challenges for our Company.  Despite a difficult operating environment we posted impressive increases in deposits and loans during the year.  Although net income decreased due to the flattened yield curve and decreased net interest margin we remain squarely focused on providing the best possible value to our shareholders.  Our net income of  $39.5 million for the year equates to 17.19% average return on equity, ranking among the leaders in the industry.

Our branch office expansion continues.  In 2007 we opened 16 new branch offices throughout all the markets we currently serve.  Since announcing our growth initiative we have opened 24 offices in Florida and 17 in downstate New York and New Jersey.  This brings our total branch offices to 107.  There are plans for a number of additional openings in 2008.   The excellent reception we have received at our new offices gives us confidence that our expansion into these areas position TrustCo very well for the future.

In 2007 we experienced continued growth in our deposit and loan portfolios.  Average loans were up 15% or $ 241.0 million compared to 2006.  This is the 3rd consecutive year of double digit growth in our loan portfolio.  Average deposits also saw impressive growth up 12% or $ 317.3 million compared to 2006.  Much of this growth can be attributed to the new markets we now serve.

The growth in our loan and deposit portfolios helped to offset the reduced net interest margin, which decreased from 3.50% in 2006 to 3.10% in 2007.  Throughout the entire industry the net interest margins continued to decrease due to the inverted yield curve.

Our hawkish approached to expense control continues.  TrustCo’s efficiency ratio of 45.45% remains at an industry leading level.  This ratio is the best indicator of expense controls at a banking company.  Our continued low level is especially impressive since it has been maintained while the Company has undergone such significant growth in our branch network.  Cost control has always been a hallmark of TrustCo's success.

TrustCo has had a long standing policy of returning excess capital to our shareholders.    We are proud of our dividend policy and although have recently decreased our quarterly cash dividend for 2008 we remain committed to the belief that excess capital should be returned to our shareholders.  Our current dividend still remains very attractive, yielding 4.67% as of February 20, 2008.  We also believe that it is prudent to retain enough capital to support our growth and remain well capitalized.

In 2007 we looked at a number of acquisition opportunities, however none of the candidates fit within or current growth strategy.   We will continue to evaluate opportunities when they arise, careful to avoid diluting shareholder value of the existing TrustCo franchise.
 

 
The past year was marred by the subprime mortgage crisis which continues to impact many in the banking industry.  At TrustCo, we are happy to report we had no involvement in originating subprime mortgages or investing in related securities.  Our conservative lending and investment practices which steers clear of the subprime area should continue to serve us well into the future.

We note the passing of Harry E. Whittingham, Jr. former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Whittingham, retired in 1983 and was a tremendous asset to our bank for over 30 years. He will be missed.

During 2007 we had a number of senior staff changes.  Kevin Timmons was hired as Vice President.  Kevin brings with him many years of experience in the financial industry. Also, John R. George was named Vice President.  I believe the TrustCo management team has the experience and ability to continue to lead the Company along the road of accomplishment and prosperity in the future.

Our Trust Department which currently manages assets in excess of $916 million, has ambitious expectations for 2008.

TrustCo continues to receive positive external recognition in the financial industry.  During 2007 we were again ranked as one of the top performing Savings Banks in the country by SNL Financial a leading financial services firm.  TrustCo placed 5th  best.  It is gratifying to be ranked as one of the top performing banks in the country.

I would like to recognize the significant contributions of the people who make up this wonderful organization from our Board of Directors to all of the dedicated employees in each department and branch office throughout the organization.

On behalf of the board of directors and employees of our Bank, we thank our shareholders for their ongoing support.


Sincerely,

/s/ Robert J. McCormick

Robert J. McCormick
President & Chief Executive Officer
Trustco Bank Corp NY

 
 

 
 
Section 2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations

The financial review which follows will focus on the factors affecting the financial condition and results of operations of TrustCo Bank Corp NY (the “Company”, “TrustCo”), during 2007 and, in summary form, the two preceding years. Net interest income and net interest margin are presented in this discussion on a taxable equivalent basis. Balances discussed are daily averages unless otherwise described. The consolidated financial statements and related notes and the quarterly reports to shareholders for 2007 should be read in conjunction with this review. Certain amounts in years prior to 2007 have been reclassified to conform with the 2007 presentation.

Overview
TrustCo recorded net income of $39.5 million or $0.525 of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to $45.3 million or $0.603 of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2006. This represents a decrease of 12.9% in net income between 2006 and 2007.

During 2007, the following had a significant effect on net income:
 
·
a decrease of $1.9 million in taxable equivalent net interest income compared to 2006, because an increase in the average balance of interest earning assets of $311.8 million was offset by an increase in interest bearing liabilities of $308.5 million and a decrease of 40 basis points (“bp”) in the net interest margin,
 
·
An increase in the provision for loan losses from a credit of $3.6 million in 2006 to a provision of $2.5 million expense in 2007,
 
·
the recognition of net gains on securities transactions of $217 thousand in 2007 compared to net securities losses of $596 thousand recorded in 2006,
 
·
the recognition of net trading gains of $891 thousand in 2007 compared to none in 2006,
 
·
a increase in total noninterest income (excluding the impact of net securities transactions and net trading gains) of $1.2 million, and
 
·
an increase of $4.5 million in total noninterest expense from $49.1 million in 2006 to $53.6 million in 2007.

TrustCo performed well in comparison to its peers with respect to a number of key performance ratios during 2007 and 2006, including:
 
·
return on average equity of 17.19% for 2007 and 18.71% for 2006, compared to a median of 8.17% in 2007 and 10.44% in 2006 for publicly traded banks and thrifts tracked by SNL Financial,
 
·
return on average assets of 1.20% for 2007 and 1.52% for 2006, compared to an the SNL median of 0.77% in 2007 and 0.94% in 2006, and
 
·
an efficiency ratio of 45.45% for 2007 and 42.03% for 2006, compared to the SNL median of 65.76% in 2007 and 63.04% in 2006.

During 2007, TrustCo’s results were negatively affected by the continued impact of a yield curve that was generally flat or inverted and its impact on deposit and loan pricing, as well as highly competitive conditions that persisted throughout the year. A flat curve exists when short and long term interest rates on similar securities are roughly equal.  An inverted yield curve exists when rates are higher for short term funds than for longer term funds. As an example, at year-end 2006 the overnight rate paid between banks of the highest quality rating (the federal fund rate) was 5.25% while the 10 year United States Treasury rate was 4.70%. At year-end 2007, the federal funds target rate was 4.25% while the 10 year United States Treasury rate was 4.04%.  This has a negative impact on banks because most of the deposit products offered to customers are priced based upon the short term rates (primarily the federal funds rate or a comparable short term rate) whereas the loan products are priced utilizing the longer term treasury (or other long term high quality investments). This can be seen in both the net interest income decrease as well as the effect on net interest margin.

 
 

 
 
TrustCo’s operations focus on providing high quality service to the communities served by its branch-banking network. The financial results for the Company are influenced by economic events that affect those communities, as well as national economic trends, primarily interest rates, affecting the entire banking industry.

TrustCo continues to open new branch locations. During 2007 sixteen new branches were added to the franchise, bringing the total to 107. The new branch locations continue the plan established several years ago to expand the franchise to areas experiencing economic growth, specifically in central Florida and the downstate New York region.  Most of the new branches opened during 2007 are located in these markets.  The new branches have the same products and features found at other TrustCo locations. With a combination of competitive rates, excellent service and convenient locations, management believes that the new branches will attract deposit and loan customers and be a welcome addition to these communities.  The branches opened since the expansion program began, including those opened in 2007, have begun to add to the Company’s customer base.  As expected, some branches have grown more rapidly than others.  Typically, new bank branches continue to grow for years after being opened.  The expansion program has contributed significantly to the growth of both deposits and loans in recent years, as well as to non-interest income and non-interest expense.

Overall, 2007 was marked by growth in each of the key drivers of performance. Deposits ended 2007 at $3.02 billion, an increase of $220.9 million or 7.9% from the prior year and the loan portfolio grew to a total of $1.93 billion, an increase of $172.4 million over the 2006 year end balance. The increase in deposits and loans reflect the success the Company has had in attracting new customers to the Bank, both in new branch locations as well as in its established offices. Management believes that TrustCo’s success is predicated on providing core banking services to a wider number of customers.

Asset/Liability Management

In managing its balance sheet, TrustCo utilizes funding and capital sources within sound credit, investment, interest rate, and liquidity risk guidelines established by management and approved by the Board of Directors. Loans and securities (including federal funds sold) are the Company’s primary earning assets. Average interest earning assets were 97.4% and 97.5% of average total assets for 2007 and 2006, respectively.

AVERAGE BALANCES, YIELDS AND NET INTEREST MARGINS
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
         
Interest
               
Interest
               
Interest
       
   
Average
   
Income/
   
Average
   
Average
   
Income/
   
Average
   
Average
   
Income/
   
Average
 
   
Balance
   
Expense
   
Rate
   
Balance
   
Expense
   
Rate
   
Balance
   
Expense
   
Rate
 
Assets
                                                     
Loans, net
  $ 1,852,310       120,491       6.50 %     1,611,355       104,437       6.48 %     1,336,899       86,669       6.48 %
                                                                         
Trading securities:
                                                                       
Government sponsored enterprises
    428,389       22,432       5.24       -       -       -       -       -       -  
Securities available for sale:
                                                                       
U.S. Treasuries and agencies
    227       11       4.72       926       42       4.56       1,059       28       2.64  
Government sponsored enterprises
    247,192       13,172       5.33       783,485       40,816       5.21       667,967       34,478       5.16  
States and political subdivisions
    127,359       8,669       6.81       127,173       8,766       6.89       127,704       9,658       7.56  
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
    161,839       7,553       4.67       184,721       8,661       4.69       210,720       9,738       4.62  
Other
    12,660       753       5.95       12,326       676       5.48       16,734       1,025       6.12  
Total securities available for sale
    549,277       30,158       5.49       1,108,631       58,961       5.32       1,024,184       54,927       5.36  
Held to maturity securities:
                                                                       
Government sponsored enterprises
    9,096       542       5.96       -       -       -       -       -       -  
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
    372,965       18,865       5.06       180,267       8,912       4.94       406,131       12,009       2.96  
Total interest earning assets
    3,212,037       192,488       5.99 %     2,900,253       172,310       5.94 %     2,767,214       153,605       5.55 %
Allowance for loan losses
    (34,939 )                     (35,538 )                     (47,653 )                
Cash and noninterest earning assets
    120,783                       109,237                       125,413                  
Total assets
  $ 3,297,881                       2,973,952                       2,844,974                  
Liabilities and shareholders' equity Interest bearing deposits:
                                                                       
Interest bearing checking accounts
  $ 281,276       857       0.30       287,406       1,303       0.45       318,167       1,376       0.43  
Savings
    639,915       8,979       1.40       702,790       10,800       1.54       783,410       6,769       0.86  
Time deposits and money markets
    1,770,748       79,425       4.49       1,393,081       55,125       3.96       1,169,018       35,481       3.04  
Total interest bearing deposits
    2,691,939       89,261       3.32       2,383,277       67,228       2.82       2,270,595       43,626       1.92  
Short-term borrowings
    95,101       3,721       3.91       95,239       3,708       3.89       83,381       2,026       2.43  
Long-term debt
    42       2       5.22       72       4       5.22       99       5       5.22  
Total interest bearing liabilities
    2,787,082       92,984       3.34 %     2,478,588       70,940       2.86 %     2,354,075       45,657       1.94 %
Demand deposits
    253,703                       245,061                       235,372                  
Other liabilities
    23,938                       20,044                       28,956                  
Shareholders' equity
    233,158                       230,259                       226,571                  
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
  $ 3,297,881                       2,973,952                       2,844,974                  
Net interest income
            99,504                       101,370                       107,948          
Taxable equivalent adjustment
            3,070                       3,103                       3,431          
Net interest income
          $ 96,434                       98,267                       104,517          
Net interest spread
                    2.65 %                     3.08 %                     3.61 %
                                                                         
Net interest margin (net interest income to total interest earnings assets
                    3.10                       3.50                       3.90  
   

Portions of income earned on certain commercial loans, U.S. Government obligations, obligations of states and political subdivisions and equity securities are exempt from federal and/or state taxation.  Appropriate adjustments have been made to reflect the equivalent amount of taxable income that would have been necessary to generate an equal amount of after tax income.  Federal and New York State tax rates used to calculate income on a tax equivalent basis were 35.0% and 7.5% for 2007, 2006 and 2005.  The average balances of securities available for sale and held to maturity were calculated using amortized cost.  The average balance of trading securities was calculated using  fair value.  Included in the average balance of shareholders' equity is $(757) thousand, $(12.0) million and $11.5 million in 2007,  2006 and 2005, respectively, net of unrealized (depreciation) appreciation, net of tax, in the available for sale securities portfolio.  The gross amounts of the net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation has been included in cash and noninterest earning assets.  Nonaccrual loans are included in average loans.

TrustCo, through its management of liabilities, attempts to provide stable and flexible sources of funding within established liquidity and interest rate risk guidelines. This is accomplished through core deposit banking products offered within the markets served by the Company. TrustCo does not actively seek to attract out-of-area deposits or so-called “hot money”; rather the Company focuses on core relationships with both depositors and borrowers.

TrustCo’s objectives in managing its balance sheet are to limit the sensitivity of net interest income to actual or potential changes in interest rates and to enhance profitability through strategies that should provide sufficient reward for understood and controlled risk. The Company is deliberate in its effort to maintain adequate liquidity under prevailing and projected economic conditions and to maintain an efficient and appropriate mix of core deposit relationships.

 
 

 
 
The Company relies on traditional banking investment instruments and its large base of core deposits to help in asset/liability management.

TrustCo does not make subprime loans or purchase investments collateralized by subprime loans.  A loan may be considered subprime for a number of reasons, but effectively subprime loans are loans where the certainty of repayment of principal and interest is lower than for a traditional prime loan due to the structure of the loan itself, the credit worthiness of the borrower, the underwriting standards of the lender or some combination of these.  For instance, adjustable loans underwritten at initial low “teaser” rates instead of the fully indexed rate, loans with 100% loan to values and loans to borrowers with poor payment history would generally be classified as subprime.  TrustCo underwrites its loan originations in a traditional manner, focusing on key factors that have proven to result in good credit decisions, rather than relying on automated systems or basing decisions primarily on one factor, such as a borrower’s credit score.

Interest Rates

TrustCo competes with other financial service providers based upon many factors including quality of service, convenience of operations, and rates paid on deposits and charged on loans. The absolute level of interest rates, changes in rates, and customers’ expectations with respect to the direction of interest rates have a significant impact on the volume of loan and deposit originations in any particular year.

Interest rates have a significant impact on the operations and financial results of all financial services companies. One of the most important interest rates used to control national economic policy is the “federal funds” rate. This is the interest rate utilized within the banking system for overnight borrowings for institutions with the highest credit rating. The federal funds rate decreased 100 basis points during 2007 from 5.25% at the beginning of the year to 4.25% by year end, with the reductions occurring late in the year. For 2006 the federal funds rose by 100 basis points from 4.25% to 5.25%. Traditionally interest rates on bank deposit accounts are heavily influenced by the federal funds rate; however during 2007 highly competitive conditions in the banking industry resulted in rates on deposit accounts not declining in line with the federal funds rate.  Subsequent to year-end, the Federal Reserve has sought to alleviate deteriorating conditions in the economy and financial markets by reducing the federal funds rate by an additional 125 basis points to 3.00%.

During this same time period the 10 year treasury bond rate did not change in-line with the federal funds rate. Despite the federal funds rate remaining flat at 5.25% through most of 2007, the rate on 10-year treasury securities rose from a rate of 4.71% at the end of December 2006 to 5.03% at June 30, 2007.  The rate on the 10-year treasury bond declined gradually in the second half of 2007, to 4.04% at December 31, 2007 and has continued to decline in early 2008.  The rate on the 10 year treasury bond and other long-term interest rates has a significant influence on the rates for new residential real estate loans. These changes in interest rates have an effect on the Company relative to the interest income on loans, securities, and federal funds sold and other short term instruments as well as on interest expense on deposits and borrowings. Residential real estate loans and longer-term investments are most affected by the changes in longer term market interest rates such as the 10 year treasury. The federal funds sold portfolio and other short term investments are affected primarily by changes in the federal funds target rate. Deposit interest rates are most affected by short term market interest rates. Also, changes in interest rates have an effect on the recorded balance of securities available for sale portfolio, which is recorded at fair market value. Generally, as interest rates increase the fair market value of the securities available for sale portfolio will decrease. Interest rates on new residential real estate loan originations are also influenced by the rates established by secondary market participants such as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Because TrustCo is a portfolio lender and does not generally sell loans into the secondary market, the Company establishes rates that management determines are appropriate in light of the long-term nature of residential real estate loans while remaining competitive with the secondary market rates.

 
 

 
 
The net effect of these interest rate changes is that the yields earned on both short term investments and longer term investments have declined since mid-year 2007, while deposit costs remained relatively flat through most of the year.

Earning Assets

Average earning assets during 2007 were $3.21 billion, which was an increase of $311.8 million from the prior year. This increase was primarily the result of growth in the average balance of loans by $241.0 million, a $428.4 million increase in trading securities, a $192.7 million increase in federal funds sold and other short-term investments and a decrease of $559.4 million of securities available for sale between year-end 2006 and 2007. The increase in the loan portfolio is primarily the result of the $191.0 million increase in real estate loans. This increase in real estate loans is a result of aggressive marketing of this product throughout the TrustCo branch network, an effective marketing campaign and competitive rates and closing costs.

Total average assets  were $3.30 billion for 2007 and $2.97 billion for 2006.

The table “Mix of Average Earning Assets” shows how the mix of the earning assets has changed over the last three years. While the growth in earning assets is critical to improved profitability, changes in the mix also have a significant impact on income levels, as discussed below.

MIX OF AVERAGE EARNING ASSETS
 
(dollars in Thousands)
                   
2007
   
2006
   
Components of
 
                     
vs.
   
vs.
   
Total Earning Assets
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
   
2006
   
2005
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Loans, net
  $ 1,852,310       1,611,355       1,336,899       240,955       274,456       57.7 %     55.6       48.3  
Trading securities:
                                                               
Government sponsored enterprises
    428,389       -       -       428,389       -       13.3       -       -  
Securities available for sale:
                                                               
U.S. Treasuries and agencies
    227       926       1,059       (699 )     (133 )     0.01       0.03       -  
Government sponsored enterprises
    247,192       783,485       667,967       (536,293 )     115,518       7.7       27.0       24.2  
States and political subdivisions
    127,359       127,173       127,704       186       (531 )     4.0       4.4       4.6  
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
    161,839       184,721       210,720       (22,882 )     (25,999 )     5.0       6.4       7.6  
Other
    12,660       12,326       16,734       334       (4,408 )     0.4       0.4       0.6  
Total securities available for sale
    549,277       1,108,631       1,024,184       (559,354 )     84,447       17.1       38.2       37.0  
Held-to-maturity securities:
                                                               
Government sponsored enterprises
    9,096       -       -       9,096       -       0.3       -       -  
                                                                 
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
    372,965       180,267       406,131       192,698       (225,864 )     11.6       6.2       14.7  
                                                                 
Total earning assets
  $ 3,212,037       2,900,253       2,767,214       311,784       133,039       100.0 %     100.0       100.0  

The average balances of securities available for sale and held to maturity securities are presented using amortized cost.

Loans:  Average loans increased $241.0 million during 2007 to $1.85 billion. Interest income on the loan portfolio also increased to $120.5 million in 2007 from $104.4 million in 2006. The average yield increased two basis points to 6.50% in 2007 compared to 2006.

Historically, TrustCo has distinguished itself as a originator of residential real estate loans. Through marketing, pricing and a customer-friendly service delivery network, TrustCo has attempted to distinguish itself from other mortgage lenders. The uniqueness of the loan products was highlighted by TrustCo in an effort to differentiate them from those of other lenders. Specifically, low closing costs, no escrow or private mortgage insurance and quick loan approvals were identified and marketed. The fact that the Company holds mortgages in its loan portfolio rather than selling them into secondary markets was also highlighted. The average balance of residential real estate loans was $1.15 billion in 2006 and $1.33 billion in 2007. Income on real estate loans increased to $83.2 million in 2007 from $71.6 million in 2006. The yield on the portfolio increased slightly, from 6.22% for 2006 to 6.23% in 2007 due to changes in retail rates in the marketplace. Residential real estate loans at December 31, 2007 were $1.42 billion compared to $1.25 billion at year end 2006, an increase of $168.0 million.  The majority of TrustCo’s real estate loans are secured by properties within the Bank’s market area.

Average commercial loans, including the commercial loan portion of the real estate construction portfolio, of $274.6 million in 2007 increased by $39.8 million from $234.7 million in 2006. The average yield on the commercial loan portfolio increased to 7.49% for 2007 from 7.55% in 2006. This resulted in income on commercial loans of $20.5 million in 2007 and $17.7 million in 2006.

 
 

 
 
TrustCo strives to maintain strong asset quality in all segments of its loan portfolio, especially commercial loans. Competition for commercial loans continues to be very intense in the Bank’s market regions. The Bank competes with large money center and regional banks as well as with smaller locally based banks and thrifts. Over the last several years, competition for commercial loans has intensified as smaller banks and thrifts have tried to develop commercial loan portfolios.

TrustCo’s commercial lending activities are focused on balancing the Company’s commitment to meeting the credit needs of businesses in its market area with the necessity of managing its credit risk. In accordance with these goals, the Company has consistently emphasized the origination of loans within its market area. The portfolio contains no foreign loans, nor does it contain any significant concentrations of credit to any single borrower or industry. The commercial loan portfolio reflects the diversity of businesses found in the Capital Region’s economy, including light manufacturing, retail, service, and real estate related business.  Commercial loans made in the downstate New York market area and in the central Florida market area also reflect the businesses in those areas, with a focus on real estate.  Market conditions in the central Florida market area have deteriorated relative to prior periods.  While that has had an impact on all lenders in the area, the impact on TrustCo has been mitigated by the limited size of the Company’s  portfolio in that market and by adherence to strong underwriting criteria.

TrustCo has a strong position in the home equity credit line product in its Capital Region market area. TrustCo was one of the first financial institutions in the area to market and originate this product, and, management believes, has developed significant expertise with respect to its risks and rewards. During 2007, the average balance of home equity credit lines was $235.9 million, an increase from $218.3 million in 2006. The home equity credit line product has developed into a significant business line for most financial services companies. Trustco Bank competes with both regional and national concerns for these lines of credit and faces stiff competition with respect to interest rates, closing costs, and customer service for these loans. TrustCo continuously reviews changes made by competitors with respect to the home equity credit line product and adjusts its offerings to remain competitive. The average yield increased to 6.73% for 2007 from 6.58% in 2006. This resulted in interest income on home equity credit lines of $15.9 million in 2007, compared to $14.4 million in 2006.

The average balance of installment loans, net, increased to $5.7 million in 2007 from $5.4 million in 2006. The yield on installment loans increased to 14.59% in 2007 from 14.25% in 2006, resulting in interest income of $838 thousand.

LOAN PORTFOLIO
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
As of December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
         
2005
       
   
Amount
   
Percent
   
Amount
   
Percent
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Commercial
  $ 252,189       13.0 %   $ 247,622       14.0 %   $ 202,570       13.8 %
Real estate - construction
    37,842       2.0       25,534       1.4       22,123       1.5  
Real estate - mortgage
    1,409,448       72.8       1,240,312       70.4       1,047,994       71.3  
Home equity lines of credit
    229,570       11.9       242,555       13.8       192,291       13.1  
Installment loans
    5,865       0.3       6,491       0.4       5,741       0.4  
Total loans
    1,934,914       100.0 %     1,762,514       100.0 %     1,470,719       100.00 %
Less: Allowance for loan losses
    34,651               35,616               45,377          
Net loans (1)
  $ 1,900,263             $ 1,726,898             $ 1,425,342          

   
Average Balances
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
   
2004
   
2003
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
   
Amount
   
Percent
   
Amount
   
Percent
   
Amount
   
Percent
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Commercial
  $ 253,506       13.7 %   $ 221,527       13.7 %   $ 192,378       14.4 %   $ 189,179       16.1 %   $ 199,729       15.7 %
Real estate - construction
    29,692       1.6       21,784       1.4       18,893       1.4       12,430       1.1       6,684       0.5  
Real estate - mortgage
    1,327,461       71.7       1,144,378       71.0       922,875       69.0       780,777       66.3       899,415       70.5  
Home equity lines of credit
    235,904       12.7       218,297       13.5       192,819       14.4       181,948       15.5       155,185       12.2  
Installment loans
    5,747       0.3       5,369       0.3       9,934       0.7       12,522       1.1       14,010       1.1  
Total loans
    1,852,310       100.0 %     1,611,355       100.0 %     1,336,899       100.0 %     1,176,856       100.0 %     1,275,023       100.0 %
Less: Allowance for loan losses
    34,939               35,538               47,653               49,299               51,311          
Net loans (1)
  $ 1,817,371             $ 1,575,817             $ 1,289,246             $ 1,127,557             $ 1,223,712          

(1) Presented net of deferred direct loan origination fees and costs.

 
                         
(dollars in thousands)
 
As of 12/31/2007
 
         
After 1 Year
             
   
In 1 Year
   
But Within
   
After
       
   
or Less
   
5 Years
   
5 Years
   
Total
 
Commercial
  $ 74,256       91,512       86,421       252,189  
Real estate construction
    37,842       -       -       37,842  
Total
    112,098       91,512       86,421       290,031  
Predetermined rates
    32,333       91,512       86,421       210,266  
Floating rates
    79,765       -       -       79,765  
Total
  $ 112,098       91,512       86,421       290,031  

Securities available for sale: The portfolio of securities available for sale is designed to provide a stable source of interest income and liquidity. The portfolio is also managed by the Company to take advantage of changes in interest rates. The securities available for sale portfolio is managed under a policy detailing the types, duration, and interest rates acceptable in the portfolio.  Mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations held in the portfolio are primarily pass-throughs issued by United States Government agencies or sponsored enterprises.

The designation of “available for sale” is made at the time of purchase, based upon management’s intent and ability to hold the securities for an indefinite period of time.  These securities are available for sale in response to changes in market interest rates, related changes in prepayment risk, needs for liquidity, or changes in the availability of and yield on alternative investments.  At December 31, 2007 some securities in this portfolio had fair values that were less than the amortized cost due to changes in interest rates and market conditions and not related to the credit condition of the issuers.  At December 31, 2007, the Company has the intent and ability to hold these securities until market recovery and until maturity, if necessary.  Accordingly, at December 31, 2007 the Company does not consider any of the unrealized losses to be other than temporary.

 
 

 
 
At December 31, 2007, securities available for sale amounted to $578.9 million at fair value, compared to $1.05 billion at year end 2006. For 2007, the average balance of securities available for sale was $549.3 million with an average yield of 5.49%, compared to an average balance in 2006 of $1.11 billion with an average yield of 5.32%. The taxable equivalent income earned on the securities portfolio in 2006 was $59.0 million, compared to $30.2 million earned in 2007.  The reduction in the level of securities available for sale and the corresponding income earned on the portfolio was primarily due to the creation of a trading portfolio following TrustCo’s adoption in 2007 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, as more fully described in the section “Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements.”  Since that adoption, a portion of the Company’s investment portfolio has been maintained in trading securities.

Securities available for sale are recorded at their fair value, with any unrealized gains or losses, net of taxes, recognized as a component of shareholders’ equity. Average balances of securities available for sale are stated at amortized cost. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the fair value of TrustCo’s portfolio of securities available for sale carried net unrealized losses of approximately $1.3 million and $17.0 million, respectively.

Trading Securities:  At December 31, 2007, the fair value of trading securities amounted to $465.2 million.  For 2007, the average balance of trading securities was $428.4 million with an average yield of 5.24%.  The Company did not maintain a trading portfolio prior to 2007.  The taxable equivalent income earned on the trading securities portfolio in 2007 was $22.4 million, compared to zero in 2006.   Trading securities are recorded at their fair value with the current period change in fair value recorded as a gain or loss, net, on the consolidated statement of income.

Held to Maturity Securities:  At December 31, 2007 the company held $15.0 million of held to maturity securities, compared to zero at December 31, 2006.  For 2007, the average balance of held to maturity securities was $9.1 million, compared to zero in 2006.  Held to maturity securities are recorded at amortized cost.  The fair value of these securities as of December 31, 2007 was $15.2 million.

The designation of “held to maturity” is made at the time of purchase, based upon management’s intent and ability to hold the securities for an indefinite period of time.  At December 31, 2007, the Company has the intent and ability to hold these securities until market recovery and until maturity, if necessary.   At December 31, 2007 some securities in this portfolio had fair values that were less than the amortized cost due to changes in interest rates and market conditions and not related to the credit condition of the issuers.  At December 31, 2007, the Company has the intent and ability to hold these securities until market recovery and until maturity, if necessary.  Accordingly, at December 31, 2007 the Company does not consider any of the unrealized losses to be other than temporary.

Securities Gains & Losses:  During 2007, TrustCo recognized approximately $217 thousand of net gains from securities transactions, compared to net losses from securities transactions of $596 thousand in 2006.  In addition, the Company recognized a net trading gain of $891 thousand in 2007, compared to none in 2006.

TrustCo has not invested in any exotic investment products such as interest rate swaps, forward placement contracts, or other instruments commonly referred to as derivatives. In addition, the Company has not invested in securities backed by subprime mortgages or in collateralized debt obligations (CDOs).  By actively managing a portfolio of high quality securities, TrustCo can meet the objectives of asset/liability management and liquidity, while at the same time producing a reasonably predictable earnings stream.

 
 

 
 
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
As of December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
   
Amortized
   
Fair
   
Amortized
   
Fair
   
Amortized
   
Fair
 
   
Cost
   
Value
   
Cost
   
Value
   
Cost
   
Value
 
Trading securities:
                                               
U. S. government sponsored enterprises
  $ 465,151       465,151       -       -       -       -  
Securities available for sale:
                                               
U. S. Treasuries and agencies
    -       -       999       999       499       498  
U. S. government sponsored enterprises
    289,035       289,690       751,539       733,549       756,525       743,265  
States and political subdivisions
    125,219       129,271       129,633       132,880       115,010       118,950  
Mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
    154,337       148,858       170,450       167,896       202,007       200,963  
Other
    650       648       680       672       685       681  
Total debt securities available for sale
    569,241       568,467       1,053,301       1,035,996       1,074,726       1,064,357  
Equity securities
    10,909       10,425       11,933       12,274       19,418       19,719  
Total securities available for sale
    580,150       578,892       1,065,234       1,048,270       1,094,144       1,084,076  
Held to maturity securities:U. S. government sponsored enterprises
    15,000       15,175       -       -       -       -  
Total investment securities
  $ 1,060,301       1,059,218       1,065,234       1,048,270       1,094,144       1,084,076  

Maturity and call dates of securities: Many of the securities in the investment portfolio have a call date in addition to the stated maturity date. Call dates allow the issuer to redeem the bonds prior to maturity at specified dates and at predetermined prices. Normally, securities are redeemed at the call date when the issuer can reissue the security at a lower interest rate. Therefore, for cash flow, liquidity and interest rate management purposes, it is important to monitor both maturity dates and call dates. The table below details the portfolio of debt securities available for sale by both maturity date and call date as of December 31, 2007. Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are reported using an estimate of average life.

Four tables under “Securities Portfolio Maturity and Call Date Distribution,” show the distribution, based on both final maturity and call date of each security, broken out by the available for sale, trading and held to maturity portfolios as of December 31, 2007.  Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are stated using estimated average life. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because of securities’ prepayments and the right of certain issuers to call or prepay their obligations without penalty.  The fourth table “Securities Portfolio Maturity Distribution and Yield,” shows the distribution of maturities for the total investment portfolio on a combined basis, based on final maturity, as well as the average yields on each type/maturity grouping.

SECURITIES PORTFOLIO MATURITY AND CALL DATE DISTRIBUTION
 
                         
Debt securities available for sale:
                       
(dollars in thousands)
 
As of December 31, 2007
 
   
Based on
   
Based on
 
   
Final Maturity
   
Call Date
 
   
Amortized
   
Fair
   
Amortized
   
Fair
 
   
Cost
   
Value
   
Cost
   
Value
 
Within 1 year
  $ 48,696       48,740       296,364       297,096  
1 to 5 years
    135,111       135,390       144,626       147,241  
5 to 10 years
    146,266       144,479       82,071       80,875  
After 10 years
    239,168       239,858       46,180       43,255  
Total debt securities available for sale
  $ 569,241       568,467       569,241       568,467  

Held to maturity securities:
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
As of December 31, 2007
 
   
Based on
   
Based on
 
   
Final Maturity
   
Call Date
 
   
Amortized
   
Fair
   
Amortized
   
Fair
 
   
Cost
   
Value
   
Cost
   
Value
 
Within 1 year
  $ -       -       15,000       15,175  
1 to 5 years
    15,000       15,175       -       -  
Total held to maturity securities
  $ 15,000       15,175       15,000       15,175  

Trading securities:
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
As of December 31, 2007
 
   
Based on
   
Based on
 
   
Final Maturity
   
Call Date
 
   
Amortized
   
Fair
   
Amortized
   
Fair
 
   
Cost
   
Value
   
Cost
   
Value
 
Within 1 year
  $ 415,132       415,132       465,151       465,151  
1 to 5 years
    50,019       50,019       -       -  
Total held to maturity securities
  $ 465,151       465,151       465,151       465,151  
 

 
SECURITIES PORTFOLIO MATURITY DISTRIBUTION AND YIELD
 
   
(dollars in thousands)
 
As of December 31, 2007
 
       
         
After 1
   
After 5
             
   
Within
   
But Within
   
But Within
   
After
       
   
1 Year
   
5 Years
   
10 Years
   
10 Years
   
Total
 
Trading securities:
                             
U. S. government sponsored enterprises
                             
Fair Value
    415,132       50,019       -       -       465,151  
Weighted average yield
    4.55 %     4.37       -       -       4.53  
                                         
Debt securities available for sale:
                                       
U. S. government sponsored enterprises
                                       
Amortized cost
  $ 45,000       45,000       89,046       109,989       289,035  
Fair Value
    45,020       45,339       89,304       110,027       289,690  
Weighted average yield
    4.88 %     5.12       5.80       5.55       5.45  
States  and political subdivisions
                                       
Amortized cost
  $ 1,179       34,387       2,406       87,247       125,219  
Fair Value
    1,182       34,612       2,464       91,013       129,271  
Weighted average yield
    3.74 %     3.41       5.47       4.78       4.41  
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
                                       
Amortized cost
  $ 1,917       55,674       54,814       41,932       154,337  
Fair Value
    1,940       55,389       52,711       38,818       148,858  
Weighted average yield
    4.98 %     4.73       4.69       4.79       4.74  
Other
                                       
Amortized cost
  $ 600       50       -       -       650  
Fair Value
    598       50       -       -       648  
Weighted average yield
    4.53 %     5.49       -       -       4.60  
Total debt securities available for sale
                                       
Amortized cost
  $ 48,696       135,111       146,266       239,168       569,241  
Fair Value
    48,740       135,390       144,479       239,858       568,467  
Weighted average yield
    4.81 %     4.52       5.38       5.14       5.02  
                                         
Held to maturity securities:
                                       
U. S. government sponsored enterprises
                                       
Amortized cost
  $ -       15,000       -       -       15,000  
Fair Value
    -       15,175       -       -       15,175  
Weighted average yield
    - %     6.00       -       -       6.00  
 
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments: During 2007, the average balance of federal funds sold and other short-term investments was $373.0 million, an increase from $180.3 million in 2006. The average rate earned on these assets was 5.06% in 2007 and 4.94% in 2006. TrustCo utilizes this category of earning assets as a means of maintaining strong liquidity as interest rates change.

During 2007, the target federal funds rate set by the Federal Open Market  Committee (FOMC) changed significantly as described previously. The federal funds sold and other short-term investments portfolio is significantly affected by changes in the target federal funds rate as are virtually all interest sensitive instruments.

The year end balance of federal funds sold and other short term investments was $286.8 million for 2007 compared to $243.4 million for year end 2006. Management anticipates evaluating the overall level of the federal funds sold and other short term investments portfolio for 2008 and will make appropriate adjustments based upon market opportunities and interest rates.

Funding Sources

TrustCo utilizes various traditional sources of funds to support its asset portfolio. The table, “Mix of Average Sources of Funding,” presents the various categories of funds used and the corresponding average balances for each of the last three years.

Deposits: Average total deposits (including time deposits greater than $100 thousand) were $2.95 billion in 2007, compared to $2.63 billion in 2006, an increase of $317.3 million. Increases were noted primarily in the time deposit, money market account and demand deposit categories. The average balance of interest bearing checking accounts decreased by $6.1 million to $281.3 million in 2007.  Average savings account balances decreased from $702.8 million in 2006 to $639.9 million in 2007. Time deposits increased on average by $298.4 million, money market accounts increased by an average of $79.3 million and demand deposits increased by $8.6 million during 2007 compared to 2006.  Changes in balances by type of deposit primarily reflect shifts in consumer demand and not any specific changes in pricing strategy.

 
 

 
 
The increase in deposits reflects the impact of new branches opened over the last several years, and the continuing focus at TrustCo on providing core banking services better, faster and cheaper than its competitors. Management believes that another contributing factor to the increase in deposits is the overall increase in the rates paid on deposit accounts. As noted previously the largest growth in deposits is in the categories of time deposits and money market deposits which carry the highest cost in terms of interest rates.  At the same time the Company experienced a deposit outflow in savings accounts which are a relatively low cost source of deposits.

MIX OF AVERAGE SOURCES OF FUNDING
 
(dollars in Thousands)
                   
2007
   
2006
   
Components of
 
                     
vs.
   
vs.
   
Total Funding
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
   
2006
   
2005
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Demand deposits
  $ 253,703       245,061       235,372       8,642       9,689       8.3 %     9.0       9.1  
Retail deposits
                                                               
Savings
    639,915       702,790       783,410       (62,875 )     (80,620 )     21.0       25.8       30.3  
Time deposits under $100 thousand
    1,066,809       882,280       813,751       184,529       68,529       35.1       32.4       31.4  
Interest bearing checking accounts
    281,276       287,406       318,167       (6,130 )     (30,761 )     9.3       10.6       12.3  
Money market deposits
    340,001       260,751       153,838       79,250       106,913       11.2       9.5       5.9  
Total retail deposits
    2,328,001       2,133,227       2,069,166       194,774       64,061       76.6       78.3       79.9  
Total core deposits
    2,581,704       2,378,288       2,304,538       203,416       73,750       84.9       87.3       89.0  
Time deposits over $100 thousand
    363,938       250,050       201,429       113,888       48,621       12.0       9.2       7.8  
Short-term borrowings
    95,101       95,239       83,381       (138 )     11,858       3.1       3.5       3.2  
Long-term debt
    42       72       99       (30 )     (27 )     -       -       -  
Total purchased liabilities
    459,081       345,361       284,909       113,720       60,452       15.1       12.7       11.0  
Total sources of funding
  $ 3,040,785       2,723,649       2,589,447       317,136       134,202       100.0 %     100.0       100.0  

The overall cost of interest bearing deposits was 2.82% in 2006 compared to 3.32% in 2007. The increase in the average balance of interest bearing deposits, coupled with a 50 basis point increase in the average cost, resulted in an increase of approximately $22.0 million in interest expense to $89.3 million in 2007.

The Company strives to maintain competitive rates on deposit accounts and to attract customers through a combination of competitive interest rates, quality customer service, and convenient banking locations. In this fashion, management believes, TrustCo is able to attract deposit customers looking for a long-term banking relationship, and to cross sell banking services utilizing the deposit account relationship as the starting point.

AVERAGE DEPOSITS BY TYPE OF DEPOSITOR
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
   
2004
   
2003
 
Individuals, partnerships and corporations
  $ 2,930,448       2,609,596       2,485,922       2,453,843       2,318,424  
U.S. Government
    14       19       72       70       73  
States and political subdivisions
    1,542       4,585       4,875       5,539       9,802  
Other (certified and official checks, etc.)
    13,638       14,138       15,098       14,727       12,528  
Total average deposits by type of depositor
  $ 2,945,642       2,628,338       2,505,967       2,474,179       2,340,827  

Other funding sources: The Company had $95.1 million of average short-term borrowings outstanding during 2007 compared to $95.2 million in 2006. The average cost of short-term borrowings was 3.91% in 2007 and 3.89% in 2006. This resulted in interest expense of approximately $3.7 million in 2007 and 2006 .

Capital Resources

Consistent with its long-term goal of operating a sound and profitable financial organization, TrustCo strives to maintain strong capital ratios and to qualify as a well capitalized bank in accordance with federal regulatory requirements. Historically, most of the Company’s capital requirements have been provided through retained earnings generated. New issues of equity securities have not been required to support the Company’s growth.

A basic element of TrustCo’s operating philosophy is that the Company will not retain excess capital. Capital generated by the Company that is in excess of the levels considered by management to be necessary for the safe and sound operation of the Company has been distributed to the shareholders in the form of cash dividends. Consequently, the capital ratios that are maintained are adequate, in the view of management, but not excessive. This philosophy has led to a dividend payout ratio of 121.8% of net income in 2007 and 105.7% of net income in 2006.  The per share dividend paid in 2007 was $0.64, compared to diluted earnings per share of $0.525.  On February 19, 2008 the Company’s Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share, which represents a reduction from the prior quarterly rate of $0.16 per share.  The lower dividend level will allow the company to enhance its capital.  Despite the reduction in the dividend, the Company remains committed to returning to shareholders capital that exceeds its needs.

 
 

 
 
TrustCo’s Tier 1 capital was 13.53% of risk-adjusted assets at December 31, 2007, and 14.88% of risk-adjusted assets at December 31, 2006. Tier 1 capital to average assets at December 31, 2007 was 6.82%, as compared to 7.67% at year end 2006.

At December 31, 2007 and 2006, TrustCo and Trustco Bank met their respective regulators’ definition of a well capitalized institution.

Risk Management

The responsibility for balance sheet risk management oversight is the function of the Asset Allocation Committee. This committee meets monthly and includes the executive officers of the Company as well as other department managers as appropriate. The meetings include a review of balance sheet structure, formulation of strategy in light of anticipated economic conditions, and comparison to established guidelines to control exposures to various types of risk.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is managed through a network of loan officer authorities, review committees, loan policies, and oversight from the senior executives of the Company. Management follows a policy of continually identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the credit risk inherent in the loan portfolio. As a result of management’s ongoing reviews of the loan portfolio, loans are placed in nonaccrual status, either due to the delinquent status of the principal and/or interest payments, or based on a judgment by management that, although payment of principal and/or interest is current, such action is prudent. Thereafter, no interest is taken into income unless received in cash or until such time as the borrower demonstrates a sustained ability to make scheduled payments of interest and principal.

Management has also developed policies and procedures to monitor the credit risk in relation to the federal funds sold portfolio. TrustCo monitors the credit rating and capital levels of the third party banks that they sell federal funds to. Only banks with the highest rating from the credit rating agency selected are included in the list for federal funds transactions.

Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets include loans in nonaccrual status, loans that have been treated as troubled debt restructurings, loans past due three payments or more and still accruing interest, and foreclosed real estate properties.

Nonperforming assets at year end 2007 and 2006  totaled $13.0 million and $7.2 million respectively. Nonperforming loans as a percentage of the total loan portfolio were 0.66% in 2007 and 0.40% in 2006.

NONPERFORMING ASSETS
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
As of December 31,
       
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
   
2004
   
2003
 
Loans in nonaccrual status
  $ 12,065       5,713       1,662       557       -  
Loans contractually past due 3 payments or more and still accruing interest
    19       211       35       -       -  
Restructured loans
    640       1,189       1,518       2,610       3,260  
Total nonperforming loans
    12,724       7,113       3,215       3,167       3,260  
Foreclosed real estate
    293       92       23       -       -  
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 13,017       7,205       3,238       3,167       3,260  
Allowance for loan losses
    34,651       35,616       45,377       49,384       48,739  
Allowance coverage of nonperforming loans
    2.72 x     5.01       14.11       15.59       14.95  
Nonperforming loans as a % of total loans
    0.66 %     0.40       0.22       0.26       0.28  
Nonperforming assets as a % of total assets
    0.39       0.23       0.11       0.11       0.12  

Included in nonperforming loans at year end 2007 were $12.1 million of loans in nonaccrual status as compared to $5.7 million at year end 2006. There were $19 thousand of loans past due three payments or more and still accruing interest at year end 2007 and $211 thousand at year end 2006.  Restructured loans at year-end 2007 were $640 thousand, compared to $1.2 million at year-end 2006.  The increase in nonperforming loans from 2006 to 2007 primarily reflects softening economic conditions.  Adherence to sound underwriting standards, vigorous loan collection efforts and timely charge-offs have been cornerstones of the operating philosophy of TrustCo and have not changed materially.

 
 

 
 
At December 31, 2007, nonperforming loans include a mix of commercial and residential loans.  Of total nonperforming loans of $12.7 million, $10.6 million were residential real estate loans and $2.1 million were commercial mortgages.

Ongoing portfolio management is intended to result in early identification and disengagement from deteriorating credits. TrustCo has a diversified loan portfolio that includes a significant balance of residential mortgage loans to borrowers in the Capital Region of New York and avoids concentrations to any one borrower or any single industry.

Management is aware of no other loans in the Bank’s portfolio that pose significant risk of the eventual non-collection of principal and interest. As of December 31, 2007, there were no other loans classified for regulatory purposes that management reasonably expects will materially impact future operating results, liquidity, or capital resources. TrustCo has no advances to borrowers or projects located outside the United States.

TrustCo has identified nonaccrual commercial and commercial real estate loans, as well as all loans restructured under a troubled debt restructuring, as impaired loans.

There were $2.1 million of nonaccrual commercial mortgages classified as impaired as of December 31, 2007 and $0 as of December 31, 2006.  At year end 2007 and 2006, there were $640 thousand and $1.2 million, respectively, of impaired retail loans. The average balances of all impaired loans were $1.3 million during 2007 and 2006 and $1.9 million in 2005. The Company recognized approximately $154 thousand of interest income on these loans in 2007, $149 thousand in 2006 and $201 thousand in 2005.

At year end 2007 there was $293 thousand of foreclosed real estate as compared to $92 thousand in 2006.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is available to absorb losses on loans that management determines are uncollectible. The balance of the allowance is maintained at a level that is, in management’s judgment, representative of the loan portfolio’s inherent risk.

In deciding on the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management reviews past due information, historical charge-off (recovery) data, and nonperforming loan activity. Also, there are a number of other factors that are taken into consideration, including:

• the magnitude, nature and trends of recent loan charge-offs, and recoveries,
• the growth in the loan portfolio and the implication that it has in relation to the economic climate in the Bank’s business territory, and
• the economic environment in the Upstate New York territory (the Company’s largest geographical area) over the last several years, as well as in the Company’s other market areas.

Management continues to monitor these trends in determining future provisions or credits for loan losses in relation to loan charge offs, recoveries and the level and trends of nonperforming loans.

The table, “Summary of Loan Loss Experience”, includes an analysis of the changes to the allowance for the past five years. Loans charged off in 2007 and 2006 were $5.7 million and $2.1 million, respectively. Most of the increase in charge-offs came in the commercial segment of the portfolio.  Most of the $2.5 million of commercial charge-offs in 2007 were due to two specific customer relationships.  TrustCo believes it has no additional exposure in regard to these relationships.  Charge-offs shifted in 2007 towards a mix of commercial, real estate and installment balances.  During 2006, 88% of charge-offs were on real estate loans, compared to a mix of 43% commercial, 43% real estate and 14% installment in 2007.  Recoveries were $2.2 million in 2007 and $3.5 million in 2006.  The Company recorded a $2.5 million provision for loan losses in 2007 compared to a credit of $3.6 million in 2006. The $2.5 million provision for loan losses in 2007 primarily related to increased net loan charge-offs and the continued growth in the total loan portfolio.  The credit provision for loan losses recorded in 2006 and 2005 was the result of the significant net recoveries in those years and the lessening impact of prior year net charge-off percentages in relation to the allowance methodology, partially offset by growth in the total loan portfolio.

 
 

 
 
SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
2007
   
2006
   
2005
   
2004
   
2003
 
 
                             
Amount of loans outstanding at end of year (less unearned income)
  $ 1,934,914       1,762,514       1,470,719       1,240,065       1,162,266  
Average loans outstanding during year (less average unearned income)
    1,852,310       1,611,355       1,336,899       1,176,856       1,275,023  
Balance of allowance for loan losses at beginning of year
    35,616       45,377       49,384       48,739       52,558  
Adjustment upon adoption of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108
    -       (7,600 )     -       -       -  
Loans charged-off:
                                       
Commercial
    2,465       19       656       335       432  
Residential real estate
    2,454       1,863       1,561       5,054       8,651  
Installment
    787       235       247       408       515  
Total
    5,706       2,117       2,464       5,797       9,598  
                                         
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
                                       
Commercial
    77       599       440       446       1,393  
Residential real estate
    2,056       2,767       4,121       5,334       3,003  
Installment
    108       165       156       212       183  
Total
    2,241       3,531       4,717       5,992       4,579  
Net loans charged-off (recovered)
    3,465       (1,414 )     (2,253 )     (195 )     5,019  
Provision (credit) for loan losses
    2,500       (3,575 )     (6,260 )     450       1,200  
Balance of allowance for loan losses at end of year
  $ 34,651       35,616       45,377       49,384       48,739  
Net charge-offs (recoveries) as a percent of average loans outstanding during year (less average unearned income)
    0.19 %     (0.09 )     (0.17 )     (0.02 )     0.39  
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans outstanding at end of year
    1.79       2.02       3.09       3.98       4.19  
 
Market Risk

The Company’s principal exposure to market risk is with respect to interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the potential for economic loss due to future interest rate changes. These economic losses can be reflected as a loss of future net interest income and/or a loss of current market value.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

TrustCo realizes income principally from the difference or spread between the interest earned on loans, investments and other interest-earning assets and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Loan volume and yield, as well as the volume of and rates on investments, deposits and borrowings are affected by market interest rates. Additionally, because of the terms and conditions of many of the loan documents and deposit accounts, a change in interest rates could also affect the projected maturities of the loan portfolio and/or the deposit base. Accordingly, TrustCo considers interest rate risk to be a market risk for the Company.

Interest rate risk management focuses on evaluating the levels of net interest income and the fair value of capital in varying interest rate cycles within Board-approved policy limits. Interest rate risk management also must take into consideration, among other factors, the Company’s overall credit, operating income, operating cost, and capital profile. The Asset Allocation Committee, which includes all members of executive management and reports quarterly to the Board of Directors, monitors and manages interest rate risk to maintain an acceptable level of potential change in the fair value of capital as a result of changes in market interest rates.

The Company uses an internal model as the primary tool to identify, quantify and project changes in interest rates and the impact on the balance sheet. The model utilizes assumptions with respect to cash flows and prepayment speeds taken both from industry sources and internally generated data based upon historical trends in the Bank’s balance sheet. Assumptions based on the historical behavior of deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in market interest rates are also incorporated into the model. This model assumes a fair value amount with respect to non-time deposit categories since these deposits are part of the core deposit products of the Company. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure the fair value of capital or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on the fair value of capital.

Using this internal model, the fair values of capital projections as of December 31, 2007 are referenced below. The base case scenario shows the present estimate of the fair value of capital assuming no change in the operating environment or operating strategies and no change in interest rates from those existing in the marketplace as of December 31, 2007. The table indicates the impact on the fair value of capital assuming interest rates were to instantaneously increase by 100 bp, 200 bp and 300 bp or to decrease by 100 bp and 200 bp.

 
 

 
 
   
Estimated Percentage of
 
   
Fair value of Capital to
 
As of December 31, 2007
 
Fair value of Assets
 
+300 BP
    9.80 %
+200 BP
    10.49  
+100 BP
    11.45  
Current rates
    12.35  
-100 BP
    12.03  
-200 BP
    11.06  

At December 31, 2007 the book value of capital (excluding the impact of accumulated other comprehensive income) to assets was 6.82%.

The fair value of capital is calculated as the fair value of assets less the fair value of liabilities in the interest ratio scenario presented. The fair value of capital in the current rate environment is 12.35% of the fair value of assets whereas the current book value of capital to assets is 6.82% at December 31, 2007. The significant difference between these two capital ratios reflects the impact that a fair value calculation can have on the capital ratios of a company. The fair value of capital calculations take into consideration the fair value of deposits, including those deposits considered core deposits, along with the fair value of assets such as the loan portfolio.

A secondary method to identify and manage the interest rate risk profile is the static gap analysis. Interest sensitivity gap analysis measures the difference between the assets and liabilities repricing or maturing within specific time periods. An asset-sensitive position indicates that there are more rate-sensitive assets than rate-sensitive liabilities repricing or maturing within specific time periods, which would generally imply a favorable impact on net interest income in periods of rising interest rates and a negative impact in periods of falling rates. A liability-sensitive position would generally imply a negative impact on net interest income in periods of rising rates and a positive impact in periods of falling rates.

Static gap analysis has limitations because it cannot measure precisely the effect of interest rate movements, and competitive pressures on the repricing and maturity characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, a significant portion of the interest sensitive assets are fixed rate securities with relatively long lives whereas the interest-bearing liabilities are not subject to these same limitations. As a result, certain assets and liabilities may in fact reprice at different times and at different volumes than the static gap analysis would indicate.

The Company recognizes the relatively long-term nature of the fixed rate residential loan portfolio. To fund those long-term assets the Company cultivates long-term deposit relationships (often called core deposits). These core deposit relationships tend to be longer term in nature and not as susceptible to changes in interest rates. Core deposit balances allow the Company to take on certain interest rate risk with respect to the asset side of the balance sheet.

The table “Interest Rate Sensitivity” presents an analysis of the interest-sensitivity gap position at December 31, 2007. All interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities are shown based upon their contractual maturity or repricing date adjusted for forecasted prepayment rates. Asset prepayment and liability repricing periods are selected after considering the current rate environment, industry prepayment and data specific to the Company. The interest rate sensitivity table indicates that TrustCo is liability sensitive for periods through 5 years and asset sensitive in the period over 5 years. The effect of being liability sensitive is that declining interest rates should result in liabilities repricing to lower levels faster than assets repricing to lower levels, thus increasing net interest income.  Conversely, should interest rates rise, the Company’s interest bearing liabilities would reprice up faster than assets, resulting in lower net interest income.

INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
 
(dollars in thousands)
             
At December 31, 2007
             
               
Repricing in:
                   
      0-90       91-365       1-5    
over 5
   
Rate
       
   
days
   
days
   
years
   
years
   
Insensitive
   
Total
 
Total assets
  $ 679,662       634,592       868,158       1,092,680       102,459       3,377,551  
Cumulative total assets
  $ 679,662       1,314,254       2,182,412       3,275,092       3,377,551          
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
  $ 819,640       691,308       1,168,346       433,253       265,004       3,377,551  
Cumulative total liabilities and shareholders' equity
  $ 819,640       1,510,948       2,679,294       3,112,547       3,377,551          
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap
  $ (139,978 )     (196,694 )     (496,882 )     162,545                  
Cumulative gap as a % of interest earning assets for the period
    -20.60 %     -14.97       -22.77       4.96                  
Cumulative interest sensitive assets to liabilities
    82.92       86.98       81.45       105.22                  

 
 

 
 
In practice, the optionality imbedded in many of the Company’s assets and liabilities, along with other limitations such as differing timing between changes in rates on varying assets and liabilities limits the effectiveness of gap analysis, thus the table should be viewed as a rough framework in the evaluation of interest rate risk.  Management takes these factors, and others, into consideration when reviewing the Bank’s gap position and establishing its asset/liability strategy.

VOLUME AND YIELD ANALYSIS
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
2007 vs. 2006
   
2006 vs. 2005
 
   
Increase
   
Due to
   
Due to
   
Increase
   
Due to
   
Due to
 
   
(Decrease)
   
Volume
   
Rate
   
(Decrease)
   
Volume
   
Rate
 
Interest income (TE):
                                   
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
  $ 9,953       9,732       221       (3,097 )     (8,707 )     5,610  
Trading securities (taxable)
    22,432       22,432       -       -       -       -  
Securities available for sale:
                                               
Taxable
    (28,706 )     (29,648 )     942       4,926       4,552       374  
Tax-exempt
    (97 )     12       (109 )     (892 )     (40 )     (852 )
Total securities available for sale
    (28,803 )     (29,636 )     833       4,034       4,512       (478 )
Held to maturity securities (taxable)
    542       542       -       -       -       -  
Loans, net
    16,054       15,705       349       17,768       17,151       617  
Total interest income
    20,178       18,775       1,403       18,705       12,956       5,749  
                                                 
Interest expense:
                                               
Interest bearing checking accounts
    (446 )     (27 )     (419 )     (73 )     (141 )     68  
Savings
    (1,821 )     (903 )     (918 )     4,031       (763 )     4,794  
Time deposits and money markets
    24,300       16,130       8,170       19,644       7,206       12,438  
Short-term borrowings
    13       (6 )     19       1,682       322       1,360  
Long-term debt
    (2 )     (2 )     -       (1 )     (1 )     -  
Total interest expense
    22,044       15,192       6,852       25,283       6,623       18,660  
Net interest income (TE)
  $ (1,866 )     3,583       (5,449 )     (6,578 )     6,333       (12,911 )

Increases and decreases in interest income and interest expense due to both rate and volume have been allocated to the two categories of variances (volume and rate) based on the percentage relationship of such variances to each other.

Liquidity Risk

TrustCo seeks to obtain favorable funding sources and to maintain prudent levels of liquid assets in order to satisfy various liquidity demands. In addition to serving as a funding source for maturing obligations, liquidity provides flexibility in responding to customer initiated needs. Many factors affect the ability to meet liquidity needs, including changes in the markets served by the Bank’s network of branches, the mix of assets and liabilities, and general economic conditions.

The Company actively manages its liquidity position through target ratios established under its Asset/ Liability Management policies. Continual monitoring of these ratios, both historically and through forecasts under multiple interest rate scenarios, allows TrustCo to employ strategies necessary to maintain adequate liquidity levels. Management has also developed various liquidity alternatives should abnormal situations develop.

The Company achieves its liability-based liquidity objectives in a variety of ways. Liabilities can be classified into three categories for the purposes of managing liability-based liquidity: core deposits, purchased money, and capital market funds. TrustCo seeks deposits that are dependable and predictable and that are based as much on the level and quality of service as they are on interest rate. Average core deposits (total deposits less time deposits greater than $100 thousand) amounted to $2.58 billion in 2007 and $2.38 billion in 2006. Average balances of core deposits are detailed in the table “Mix of Average Sources of Funding.”

In addition to core deposits, another source of liability-based funding available to TrustCo is purchased money, which consists of long-term and short-term borrowings, federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, and time deposits greater than $100 thousand. The average balances of these purchased liabilities are detailed in the table “Mix of Average Sources of Funding.” During 2007, the average balance of purchased liabilities was $459.1 million, compared with $345.4 million in 2006.

TrustCo also has a line of credit available with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York.

The Company’s overall liquidity position is favorable compared to its peers.  A simple liquidity proxy often used in the industry is the ratio of loans to deposits, with a lower number representing a more liquid institution.  At December 31, 2007, TrustCo’s loan to deposit ratio was 64.06%, up from 62.96%  at December 31, 2006, while the median peer group ratios of 100.19% and 95.17%, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Risk

Commitments to extend credit: The Bank makes contractual commitments to extend credit, and extends lines of credit which are subject to the Bank’s credit approval and monitoring procedures. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, commitments to extend credit in the form of loans, including unused lines of credit, amounted to $267.7 million and $297.6 million, respectively. In management’s opinion, there are no material commitments to extend credit that represent unusual risk.

 
 

 
 
The Company has issued conditional commitments in the form of standby letters of credit to guarantee payment on behalf of a customer and guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally arise in connection with lending relationships. The credit risk involved in issuing these instruments is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Contingent obligations under standby letters of credit totaled approximately $4.0 million and $4.3 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and represent the maximum potential future payments the Company could be required to make. Typically, these instruments have terms of 12 months or less and expire unused; therefore, the total amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each customer is evaluated individually for creditworthiness under the same underwriting standards used for commitments to extend credit and on- balance sheet instruments. Company policies governing loan collateral apply to standby letters of credit at the time of credit extension. Loan-to-value ratios are generally consistent with loan-to-value requirements for other commercial loans secured by similar types of collateral. The fair value of the Company’s standby letters of credit at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was insignificant.

Other off-balance sheet risk: TrustCo does not engage in activities involving interest rate swaps, forward placement contracts, or any other instruments commonly referred to as “derivatives”. Management believes these instruments pose a high degree of risk, and that investing in them is unnecessary.  TrustCo has no off-balance sheet partnerships, joint ventures, or other risk sharing entities.

Noninterest Income and Expense

Noninterest income: Noninterest income is a significant source of revenue for the Company and an important factor in overall results. Total noninterest income was $17.8 million in 2007, $14.9 million in 2006 and $25.3 million in 2005. Included in the 2007 results are $217 thousand of net securities gains compared with net losses of $596 thousand in 2006 and net gains of approximately $6.0 million in 2005.  Net trading gains of $891 thousand were recorded in 2007. There were no trading gains or losses prior to 2007.  Excluding securities and trading gains and losses, noninterest income was $16.7 million in 2007,  $15.5 million in 2006 and  $19.3 million in 2005.

The Trust Department contributes a large recurring portion of noninterest income through fees generated by providing fiduciary and investment management services. Income from these fiduciary activities totalled $5.7 million in 2007, $5.5 million in 2006, and $6.0 million in 2005. Trust fees are generally calculated as a percentage of the assets under management by the Trust Department. Assets under management by the Trust Department are not included on the Company’s consolidated financial statements because the Trust Department holds these assets in a fiduciary capacity. At December 31, 2007 and 2006 assets under management by the Trust Department were approximately $915.8 million and $901.4 million, respectively.

Changes in fees for services to customers reflect changes in the fee scale used for pricing the services and the volume of services customers utilized.

Included in the category of other noninterest income are certain transactions that occurred in 2005 as follows:
 
the sale of the former operations center in Schenectady at a net gain of approximately $600 thousand,
 
the sale of the credit card portfolio for a net gain of approximately $1.4 million and

 
 

 
 
 
the sale of the Canajoharie Branch for a net gain of  approximately $600 thousand.

Similar items did not recur in 2006 or 2007.

NONINTEREST INCOME
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
For the year ended December 31,
   
2007 vs. 2006
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Trust department income
  $ 5,743       5,463       6,009       280       5.1 %
Fees for services to customers
    9,498       8,572       8,171       926       10.8 %
Net trading gains
    891       -       -       891       100.0 %
Net gain (loss) on securities transactions
    217       (596 )     5,999       813       136.4 %
Other
    1,413       1,420       5,110       (7 )     -0.5 %
Total noninterest income
  $ 17,762       14,859       25,289       2,903       19.5 %

Noninterest expense: Noninterest expense was $53.6 million in 2007, compared with $49.1 million in 2006 and $46.2 million in 2005. TrustCo’s operating philosophy stresses the importance of monitoring and controlling the level of noninterest expense. The efficiency ratio is a strong indicator of how well controlled and monitored these expenses are for a banking enterprise. A low ratio indicates highly efficient performance. TrustCo’s efficiency ratio was 45.5% in 2007, 42.0% in 2006 and 38.3% in 2005. Excluded from the efficiency ratio calculation was $1.1 million of non-recurring income items in 2007, $22 thousand of net losses from non-recurring income items in 2006, and $3.2 million of non-recurring income in 2005.  These revenue items primarily consisted of gain and losses on sale of various assets (including securities).  Additionally, $806 thousand, $56 thousand and $812 thousand of non-recurring expenses primarily consisting of computer consulting costs for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were excluded from the calculation.

NONINTEREST EXPENSE
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
For the year ended December 31,
   
2007 vs. 2006
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Salaries and employee benefits
  $ 20,268       18,427       18,663       1,841       10 %
Net occupancy expense
    10,164       7,947       7,308       2,217       28 %
Equipment expense
    3,369       3,042       2,721       327       11 %
Professional Services
    4,152       3,925       3,372       227       6 %
Outsourced Services
    4,309       4,246       4,093       63       1 %
Advertising Expense
    2,343       2,277       1,415       66       3 %
Other real estate (income) expense, net
    (11 )     27       (617 )     (38 )     -141 %
Other
    8,999       9,171       9,277       (172 )     -2 %
Total noninterest expense
  $ 53,593       49,062       46,232       4,531       9 %

Salaries and employee benefits are the most significant component of noninterest expense. For 2007, these expenses amounted to $20.3 million, compared with $18.4 million in 2006, and $18.7 million in 2005.  The increase in salaries and benefits was primarily due to the Company’s branch expansion program.

Net occupancy expense increased $2.2 million to $10.2 million between 2006 and 2007 and increased by $639 thousand from 2005 to 2006 due primarily to new branch openings during 2006 and 2007. Equipment expense, increased $327 thousand for 2007 to $3.4 million as compared to $3.0 million in 2006, and increased by $321 thousand in 2006 compared to 2005. The increase in net occupancy expense and equipment expense is the result of new equipment purchased for the branch expansion program.

Professional services expense increased to $4.2 million in 2007 compared to $3.9 million in 2006 and $3.4 million in 2005. The increase in professional service expense is due primarily to additional fees for legal, accounting and tax advice.

Outsourced service expense was $4.3 million in 2007 compared to $4.2 million in 2006 and $4.1 million in 2005. The increase is the result of increased volumes.

Advertising expense was $2.3 million in both 2007 and 2006, and was $1.4 in 2005. The increase in 2006 was the result of expenses for advertising and promotional programs with respect to new branch openings and increased efforts throughout the various areas TrustCo operates.  In 2007 a shift to utilize internal resources more heavily helped to hold costs flat despite a significant number of new branches opened.

Changes in other components of noninterest expense are the results of normal banking activities and the increased activities associated with new branching facilities.

Income Tax

In 2007, TrustCo recognized income tax expense of $18.6 million, as compared to $22.3 million in 2006 and $30.8 million in 2005. The tax expense on the Company’s income was different than tax expense at the federal statutory rate of 35%, due primarily to tax exempt income and, to a lesser extent, the effect of New York State income taxes.

 
 

 


Deferred tax assets are recognized subject to management’s judgment that realization is more likely than not. Based primarily on the sufficiency of historical and future taxable income, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets of $20.1 million and $21.9 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, will be realized. In addition to the deferred tax asset described above, the Company has $502 thousand and $6.8 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively of a deferred tax asset relative to the net unrealized losses on securities available for sale and a deferred tax liability at December 31, 2007 of $5.3 million and $4.8 million at December 31, 2006 as a result of the overfunded portion in the Company’s pension and post retirement benefit plans.

Certain tax strategies utilized by the Company prior to 2007 may be negatively effected by proposed New York State budget proposals. Should these budget proposals be implemented, future tax expense would be expected to increase.
 
Contractual Obligations
The Company is contractually obligated to make the following payments on long-term debt and leases as of December 31, 2007:
(dollars in thousands)
 
Payments Due by Period:
 
   
Less Than
      1-3       3-5    
More than
       
   
1 Year
   
Years
   
Years
   
5 Years
   
Total
 
                                   
Federal Home
                                 
Loan Bank borrowings
  $ 29       -       -       -       29  
Operating leases
    4,211       8,262       7,832       36,818       57,123  
Total
  $ 4,240       8,262       7,832       36,818       57,152  
 
In addition, the Company is contractually obligated to pay data processing vendors approximately $5 million per year through 2013.

Also, the Company is obligated under its various employee benefit plans to make certain payments in the future. The payments vary from $1.5 million to $1.7 million through 2017. Additionally, the Company is obligated to pay the accumulated benefits under the supplementary pension plan which amounted to $5.1 million as of December 31, 2007 and $4.7 million as of December 31, 2006. Actual payments under the plan would be made in accordance with the plan provisions.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The consolidated financial statements for the years ended 2007, 2006 and 2004 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increasing cost of operations.

Unlike most industrial companies, nearly all the assets and liabilities of the Company are monetary.  As a result, changes in interest rates have a greater impact on the Company’s performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation, because interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the price of goods and services.

 
 

 
 
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

(a) Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, and No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”.

Effective January 1, 2007 TrustCo elected early adoption of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (SFAS No. 159), and No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157).  SFAS No. 159, which was issued in February 2007, generally permits the measurement of selected eligible financial instruments at fair value at specified election dates.  SFAS No. 157 generally establishes the definition of fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurement.  This statement establishes a hierarchy of the levels of fair value measurement techniques.  Upon adoption of SFAS No. 159, TrustCo elected to apply the fair value option for certain U.S. government sponsored enterprises securities with lower yields, which generally had longer duration, that were classified in the available for sale portfolio totaling approximately $517 million ($502 million at fair value).  Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 159, the Company intended to hold these securities until a market price recovery or possibly to maturity.  The Company changed its intent with respect to these securities to enable the Company to record these losses directly to undivided profits rather than current income based on the transition provisions of SFAS No. 159 by electing the fair value option for these securities.  As a result, unrealized losses, net of taxes, of $8.6 million were directly recorded to undivided profits. This charge to undivided profits had no overall impact on total shareholders’ equity because the fair value adjustment had previously been included as an element of shareholders’ equity in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) account, net of tax.

As a result of TrustCo’s fair value measurement election for the above financial instruments, TrustCo recorded $3.4 million of pre-tax unrealized trading gains in its first quarter earnings for the change in fair value of such instruments from the effective election date of January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007.  Additionally, TrustCo sold in the second quarter all of these securities and recognized pre-tax trading losses of $2.8 million in the second quarter.  While the proceeds from this sale were initially invested in federal funds sold, the Company re-invested these proceeds by purchasing securities, primarily U.S. government sponsored enterprises, for its trading portfolio.  As of December 31, 2007 $465 million of U.S. government sponsored enterprises securities were held in the trading portfolio.  TrustCo believes that its adoption of the standard will have a positive impact on its ability to manage its investment portfolio because it will enable the Company to sell the securities that it has elected the fair value option for without recording other-than-temporary impairment on the remainder of the available-for-sale portfolio.  Additionally, recording the unrealized losses on these securities directly to undivided profits as part of the transition adjustment will benefit future periods’ net income because the January 1, 2007 unrealized loss will not be realized in the income statement when the security is subsequently sold.

As already stated, the Company recorded a $8.6 million charge, net of tax, to undivided profits as a result of adopting SFAS No. 159 as of January 1, 2007.  Had the Company not adopted this new accounting standard and reclassified the available-for-sale securities to trading account assets as of that date, the charge to capital would have been recorded as a charge to net income.

The following table presents information relative to the assets identified for the fair value option of accounting as of the initial implementation date of January 1, 2007:
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
Statement of
Condition 12/31/06
Prior to adoption
 
Net Loss recognized
in undivided profits
upon adoption
   
Statement of
Condition after a
doption of Fair
Value Option
 
                   
Securities available for sale transferred to trading account assets:
           
Amortized cost
  $ 516,558       (14,313 )     502,245  
Unrealized depreciation
    (14,313 )     14,313       -  
Net transferred to trading account assets
  $ 502,245       -       502,245  
 
The securities transferred to trading account assets as of January 1, 2007 were included previously in the available for sale portfolio as Government sponsored enterprises.

 
 

 


TrustCo determined that it would be appropriate to account for certain of the Government sponsored enterprises securities at fair value based upon the relatively low interest rate on these bonds.  Government sponsored enterprises bonds held by Trustco Bank in the available for sale portfolio as of January 1, 2007 under a predetermined interest rate (generally 5.45% or below) were identified as bonds to be recorded at fair value (the bonds also had an average life to maturity of approximately 9 years).  Interest on trading account securities are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income based upon the coupon of the underlying bond and the par value of the securities.  Unrealized gains and losses on the trading account securities are recognized based upon the fair value at period end compared to the beginning of that period.

After the adoption of SFAS 159 as of January 1, 2007 there were $232.3 million of remaining Government sponsored enterprises obligations classified as available for sale securities which had gross unrealized losses of $3.3 million.  These securities were primarily higher yielding assets and generally had shorter terms to final maturity.  It is management’s intention that Government sponsored enterprises securities that remain in the available for sale portfolio after the adoption of SFAS 159 will be held to generate relatively higher yields or provide liquidity in the form of maturing or called securities.  Upon adoption of SFAS 159, the yield on the securities in the available for sale portfolio ranged from 4.30% to 5.82%, and had an average term to maturity of 7 years ranging from 2007 – 2019 final maturity.

The following tables presents the financial instruments recorded at fair value by the Company as of December 31, 2007.

(dollars in thousands)
 
Fair value measurements at December 31, 2007 using:
             
                               
   
Total carrying
                         
   
amount in
               
Quoted prices in
       
   
statement of
   
Statement 107 Fair
   
Fair value
   
active markets for
   
Significant other
 
   
financial condition
   
Value Estimate
   
measurement
   
identical assets
   
observable input
 
Description
 
as of 12/31/07
   
as of 12/31/07
   
as of 12/31/07
   
(Level 1)
   
(Level 2)
 
Securities available for sale
  $ 578,892       578,892       578,892       -       578,892  
Trading securities
    465,151       465,151       465,151       -       465,151  
Other real estate owned
    293       293       293       -       293  
 
   
Change in fair value for the 12 month period
 
   
from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007 for
 
   
items measured at
 
   
fair value pursuant to
 
   
election of the Fair Value Option
 
             
         
Total Changes
 
   
Unrealized
   
Included in
 
   
Trading
   
Values Included in
 
   
Gains
   
Period Earnings
 
             
Securities available-for-sale
  $ -       -  
Trading account securities
    891       891  
Other real estate owned
    -       -  
 
Securities available for sale and trading account securities are fair valued utilizing an independent bond pricing service.  The pricing service uses a variety of techniques to arrive at fair value including market maker bids and quotes of significantly similar securities and pricing models.  Inputs to the pricing models include recent trades, benchmark interest rates, spreads and actual and projected cash flows.  Other real estate owned fair value is determined by observable comparable sales and property valuation techniques.

 
(b) FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” as amended by FSP No. 48-1 “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48.”

TrustCo adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”) as of January 1, 2007.  FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken on a tax return.  As a result of the Company’s adoption of FIN 48, there were no required adjustments to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Trustco also adopted FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 48-1 “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FSP 48-1)”. FSP 48-1 provides guidance on how to determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. FSP 48-1 was effective retroactively to January 1, 2007 and did not significantly impact the Corporation’s financial statements.

TrustCo has implemented certain tax return positions that have not been fully recognized for financial statement purposes based upon management’s evaluation of the probability of the benefit being realized.  For 2007, the Company has recognized interest expense on the uncertain tax position as an element of other expenses and nothing for potential tax penalties.

 
 

 
 
For the twelve month period ended December 31, 2007 the unrecognized tax benefit and change in that benefit from the beginning of the year is as follows:
 
(Dollars in thousands)
     
       
Balance January 1, 2007
  $ 3,392  
Additional unrecognized benefit for the period from 1/1/07 to 12/31/07
    631  
         
Balance December 31, 2007
  $ 4,023  

If the unrecognized tax benefit were to be recognized for financial reporting purposes the impact would be to decrease total tax expense by the balance not previously recognized (as of December 31, 2007 that amount would be $2.6 million, after tax).  Interest expense of $347 thousand has been recorded during 2007 and included in accrued expenses and other liabilities (no penalties have been accrued).  The total accrual for interest expense included in the statement of financial condition is $736 thousand and is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities.

Open Federal tax years are 2004 through 2007, and for New York State they are 2003 through 2007.  The 2006 state and federal tax returns were filed in the third quarter of 2007. The IRS is currently examining the 2004 and 2005 returns and any adjustments are not expected to materially impact reported tax amounts.

The New York State tax returns are currently under audit for the periods that the uncertain tax return position was initiated. The Company does not believe the unrecognized tax benefit will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months unless the New York State tax return audits are completed, and an unfavorable adjustment is recognized.  It is reasonably possible that a reduction in the estimate may occur, however, a quantification of a reasonable range cannot be determined.


(c) Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R) “(SFAS No. 158). For defined benefit and post retirement plans, SFAS No. 158 requires that the funded status be recognized in the statement of financial condition, that assets and obligations that determine funded status be measured as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year, and that changes in funded status be measured as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year, and that changes in funded status be recognized in comprehensive income in the year the changes occur. SFAS No. 158 does not change the amount of net periodic benefit cost (income) included in net income or address measurement issues related to defined benefit or post-retirement plans. The requirement to recognize funded status was effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure assets and obligations as of the employer’s fiscal year was effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The unrecognized overfunded pre-tax components of the defined benefit pension plan and the retiree medical plan of $12.1 million were recorded on the consolidated statement of financial condition at December 31, 2006. Balances previously  recognized in the financial statements were adjusted to reflect those overfunded positions with the offset as an adjustment to the deferred income tax accounts and to accumulated other comprehensive income, as an element of shareholder’s equity.

 
 

 
 
(d) Prior Year Immaterial Uncorrected Misstatements
In September 2006, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (SAB No. 108). SAB No. 108 requires quantification of prior year immaterial uncorrected misstatements under both the “rollover approach” and the “iron curtain approach.” The “rollover approach” quantifies a misstatement based on the amount of the error originating in the current year income statement, but ignores the effects of correcting the portion of the current year balance sheet misstatement that originated in prior years. The “iron curtain approach” quantifies a misstatement based on the effects of correcting the misstatement existing in the balance sheet at the end of the current year, irrespective of the misstatement’s year(s) of origination. Prior to SAB No. 108, the Company utilized the rollover approach when quantifying misstatements. The provisions of SAB No. 108 were required to be applied to financial statements for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006.
As a result of the adoption of SAB No. 108, TrustCo recognized a reduction in other liabilities and a decrease in the allowance for loan losses, as described below. These entries were recorded as adjustments of the beginning of the year 2006 opening balances for these accounts and the impact, net of tax, was reflected in shareholders’ equity as a cumulative effect adjustment to undivided profits, a component of shareholders’ equity.
The entries to reduce other liabilities were in connection with the following items:
Approximately $3.0 million of unused accrued interest for potential tax settlements related to certain tax positions, including the timing of loan charge offs for tax return purposes, in connection with mergers in 1985 and 1991.
Approximately $1.9 million of unused accrued expenses related to credit risk on long term letters of credit acquired in a 1991 aquisition. These letters of credit generally expired through the mid 1990’s.
Approximately $1.4 million in unused accrued expenses related to the anticipated termination of a computer services contract in the early 1990s. Negotiations subsequently resolved the matter without requiring full payment.
Approximately $2.0 million in unused accrued expenses related to credit risk associated with unadvanced amounts on credit cards, not reversed as this portfolio was paid down.
These misstatements were not material to the consolidated financial statements in each of the respective years affected.
The reduction of the allowance for loan losses was the result of excess provisions for loan losses recorded primarily in the 1990s. This misstatement primarily occurred as a result of the Company’s extrapolation of historical loan loss experience over the future expected lives of the respective loan portfolios (also known as “life of the loan” approach), and the Company did not consider qualitative factors which impacts the credit quality of the respective loan categories.  The misstatement of the provision for loan losses was not considered material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in any of the respective years impacted by these misstatements.
Under the rollover approach described above, management did not consider these items to be material to the consolidated financial statements. However, under the dual approach required by SAB No. 108, these items were adjusted effective as of January 1, 2006.
In accordance with the transition provisions of SAB No. 108, the Company recorded the cumulative effect of these items as an adjustment to its opening undivided profits for fiscal 2006, net of their respective tax effects.

 
 

 
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
Pursuant to recent SEC guidance, management of the Company is encouraged to evaluate and disclose those accounting policies that are judged to be critical policies – those most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results, and that require management’s most difficult subjective or complex judgments.  Management considers the accounting policy relating to the allowance for loan losses to be a critical accounting policy given the inherent uncertainty in evaluating the levels of the allowance required to cover credit losses in the portfolio and the material effect that such judgments can have on the results of operations.  Included in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K is a description of the significant accounting policies that are utilized by the Company in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations (Revised 2007).” SFAS 141R replaces SFAS 141, “Business Combinations,” and applies to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. SFAS 141R requires an acquirer, upon initially obtaining control of another entity, to recognize the assets, liabilities and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value as of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration is required to be recognized and measured at fair value on the date of acquisition rather than at a later date when the amount of that consideration may be determinable beyond a reasonable doubt. This fair value approach replaces the cost-allocation process required under SFAS 141 whereby the cost of an acquisition was allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value. SFAS 141R requires acquirers to expense acquisition-related costs as incurred rather than allocating such costs to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as was previously the case under SFAS 141. Under SFAS 141R, the requirements of SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” would have to be met in order to accrue for a restructuring plan in purchase accounting. Pre-acquisition contingencies are to be recognized at fair value, unless it is a non-contractual contingency that is not likely to materialize, in which case, nothing should be recognized in purchase accounting and, instead, that contingency would be subject to the probable and estimable recognition criteria of SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” SFAS 141R is expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s accounting for business combinations closing on or after January 1, 2009.

SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB Statement No. 51.” SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to establish accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among other requirements, SFAS 160 requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the non-controlling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest. SFAS 160 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements, because the Company does not currently have a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary.

FSP No. 48-1 “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48.” FSP 48-1 provides guidance on how to determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. FSP 48-1 was effective retroactively to January 1, 2007 and did not significantly impact the Company’s financial statements.

 
 

 
 
SAB No. 109, “Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings.” SAB No. 109 supersedes SAB 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments,” and indicates that the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in the measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. The guidance in SAB 109 is applied on a prospective basis to derivative loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. SAB 109 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.


Forward-Looking Statements

Statements included in this review and in future filings by TrustCo with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in TrustCo’s press releases, and in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, which are not historical or current facts, are “forward-looking statements” made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected. TrustCo wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The following important factors, among others, in some cases have affected and in the future could affect TrustCo’s actual results, and could cause TrustCo’s actual financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in any forward-looking statement: (1) credit risk, (2) interest rate risk, (3) competition, (4) changes in the regulatory environment, (5) real estate and collateral values, and (6) changes in local market areas and general business and economic trends. The foregoing list should not be construed as exhaustive, and the Company disclaims any obligation to subsequently revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements, or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

 
 

 
 
SUMMARY OF UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
      O1       Q2       Q3       Q4    
Year
      O1       Q2       Q3       Q4    
Year
 
Income statement:
                                                                           
Interest income
  $ 45,281       47,548       48,839       47,750       189,418       40,709       41,942       42,842       43,714       169,207  
Interest expense
    21,560       23,566       24,284       23,574       92,984       15,198       17,018       18,479       20,245       70,940  
Net interest income
    23,721       23,982       24,555       24,176       96,434       25,511       24,924       24,363       23,469       98,267  
Provision (credit) for loan losses
    -       -       -       2,500       2,500       (1,800 )     (1,775 )     -       -       (3,575 )
Net interest income after provison (credit) for loan losses
    23,721       23,982       24,555       21,676       93,934       27,311       26,699       24,363       23,469       101,842  
Noninterest income
    7,548       1,146       4,751       4,317       17,762       3,305       3,917       3,895       3,742       14,859  
Noninterest expense
    12,706       13,458       13,597       13,832       53,593       11,925       11,986       11,699       13,452       49,062  
Income before income taxes
    18,563       11,670       15,709       12,161       58,103       18,691       18,630       16,559       13,759       67,639  
Income tax expense
    6,249       3,563       5,069       3,755       18,636       6,325       6,206       5,380       4,403       22,314  
Net income
  $ 12,314       8,107       10,640       8,406       39,467       12,366       12,424       11,179       9,356       45,325  
Per share data:
                                                                               
Basic earnings
  $ 0.164       0.108       0.142       0.112       0.525       0.165       0.166       0.149       0.125       0.605  
Diluted earnings
    0.164       0.108       0.141       0.111       0.525       0.164       0.165       0.149       0.125       0.603  
Cash dividends declared
    0.160       0.160       0.160       0.160       0.640       0.160       0.160       0.160       0.160       0.640  

FIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL DATA
 
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
   
2004
   
2003
 
Statement of income data:
                             
Interest income
  $ 189,418       169,207       150,174       138,786       137,130  
Interest expense
    92,984       70,940       45,657       38,757       40,739  
Net interest income
    96,434       98,267       104,517       100,029       96,391  
Provision (credit) for loan losses
    2,500       (3,575 )     (6,260 )     450       1,200  
Net interest income after provision (credit)for loan losses
    93,934       101,842       110,777       99,579       95,191  
Noninterest income
    16,654       15,455       19,290       18,253       19,842  
Net trading gains
    891       -       -       -       -  
Net gain (loss) on securities transactions
    217       (596 )     5,999       13,712       9,807  
Noninterest expense
    53,593       49,062       46,232       48,165       48,486  
Income before income taxes
    58,103       67,639       89,834       83,379       76,354  
Income taxes
    18,636       22,314       30,845       26,839       23,323  
Net income
  $ 39,467       45,325       58,989       56,540       53,031  
Share data:
                                       
Average equivalent diluted shares (in thousands)
    75,202       75,149       75,397       75,081       75,306  
Tangible book value
  $ 3.14       3.19       3.05       3.02       3.06  
Cash dividends
    0.640       0.640       0.610       0.600       0.600  
Basic earnings
    0.525       0.605       0.787       0.761       0.713  
Diluted earnings
    0.525       0.603       0.782       0.753       0.704  
Financial:
                                       
Return on average assets
    1.20 %     1.52       2.07       2.00       1.96  
Return on average shareholders' equity
    17.19       18.71       26.07       26.65       26.21  
Cash dividend payout ratio
    121.79       105.70       77.46       78.83       83.98  
Tier 1 capital to average assets (leverage ratio)
    6.82       7.67       8.04       7.74       7.53  
Tier 1 capital as a % of total risk adjusted assets
    13.53       14.88       16.58       17.09       16.54  
Total capital as a % of total risk adjusted assets
    14.79       16.14       17.85       18.37       17.82  
Efficiency ratio
    45.45       42.03       38.29       38.78       38.33  
Net interest margin
    3.10 %     3.50       3.90       3.85       3.94  
Average balances:
                                       
Total assets
  $ 3,297,881       2,973,952       2,844,974       2,828,195       2,710,175  
Earning assets
    3,212,037       2,900,253       2,767,214       2,729,280       2,606,292  
Loans, net
    1,852,310       1,611,355       1,336,899       1,176,856       1,275,023  
Allowance for loan losses
    (34,939 )     (35,538 )     (47,653 )     (49,299 )     (51,311 )
Trading securities
    428,389       -       -       -       -  
Securities available for sale
    549,277       1,108,631       1,024,184       1,057,845       833,905  
Held to maturity securities
    9,096       -       -       -       -  
Deposits
    2,945,642       2,628,338       2,505,967       2,474,179       2,340,827  
Short-term borrowings
    95,101       95,239       83,381       100,855       107,799  
Long-term debt
    42       72       99       151       326  
Shareholders' equity
    233,158       230,259       226,571       223,719       225,045  

 
 

 
 
Glossary of Terms

Allowance for Loan Losses
A balance sheet account which represents management’s estimate of probable credit losses in the loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses is added to the allowance account, charge offs of loans decrease the allowance balance and recoveries on previously charged off loans serve to increase the balance.
Basic Earnings Per Share
Net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Cash Dividends Per Share
Total cash dividends for each share outstanding on the record dates.
Comprehensive Income
Net income plus the change in selected items recorded directly to capital such as the net change in unrealized market gains and losses on securities available for sale and the overfunded/underfunded positions in the retirement plans.
Core Deposits
Deposits that are traditionally stable, including all deposits other than time deposits of $100,000 or more.
Derivative Investments
Investments in futures contracts, forwards, swaps, or other investments with similar characteristics.
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, taking into consideration the effect of any dilutive stock options.
Earning Assets
The sum of interest-bearing deposits with banks, securities available for sale, investment securities, loans, net of unearned income, and federal funds sold and other short term investments.
Efficiency Ratio
Noninterest expense (excluding nonrecurring charges, and other real estate expense) divided by taxable equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income (excluding securities transactions and other non-recurring income items). This is an indicator of the recurring total cost of operating the Company in relation to the recurring total income generated.
Federal Funds Sold
A short term (generally one business day) investment of excess cash reserves from one bank to another.
Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE)
Government Sponsored Enterprises are corporations sponsored by the United States government and include the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC or Freddie Mac), and the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA or Fannie Mae). Obligations of these enterprises are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the United States.
Impaired Loans
Loans, principally commercial, where it is probable that the borrower will be unable to make the principal and interest payments according to the contractual terms of the loan, and all loans restructured subsequent to January 1, 1995.
Interest Bearing Liabilities
The sum of interest bearing deposits, federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase,  short-term borrowings, and long-term debt.
Interest Rate Spread
The difference between the taxable equivalent yield on earning assets and the rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.

 
 

 
 
Liquidity
The ability to meet loan commitments, deposit withdrawals, and maturing borrowings as they come due.
Net Interest Income
The difference between income on earning assets and interest expense on interest bearing liabilities.
Net Interest Margin
Fully taxable equivalent net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.
Net Loans Charged Off
Reductions to the allowance for loan losses written off as losses, net of the recovery of loans previously charged off.
Nonaccrual Loans
Loans for which no periodic accrual of interest income is recognized.
Nonperforming Assets
The sum of nonperforming loans plus foreclosed real estate properties.
Nonperforming Loans
The sum of loans in a nonaccrual status (for purposes of interest recognition), plus loans whose repayment criteria have been renegotiated to less than market terms due to the inability of the borrowers to repay the loan in accordance with its original terms, plus accruing loans three payments or more past due as to principal or interest payments.
Parent Company
A company that owns or controls a subsidiary through the ownership of voting stock.
Real Estate Owned
Real estate acquired through foreclosure proceedings.
Restructured Loans
A refinanced loan in which the bank allows the borrower certain concessions that would normally not be considered. The concessions are made in light of the borrower’s financial difficulties and the bank’s objective to maximize recovery on the loan.
Return on Average Assets
Net income as a percentage of average total assets.
Return on Average Equity
Net income as a percentage of average equity, excluding the impact of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Risk-Adjusted Assets
A regulatory calculation that assigns risk factors to various assets on the balance sheet.
Risk-Based Capital
The amount of capital required by federal regulatory standards, based on a risk-weighting of assets.
Subprime Loans
Loans to borrowers which display one or more characteristics of reduced payment capacity.
Tangible Book Value Per Share
Total shareholders’ equity (less goodwill) divided by shares outstanding on the same date. This provides an indication of the tangible book value of a share of stock.
Taxable Equivalent (TE)
Tax exempt income that has been adjusted to an amount that would yield the same after tax income had the income been subject to taxation at the statutory federal and/or state income tax rates.
Tier 1 Capital
Total shareholders’ equity accumulated other comprehensive income.

 
 

 
 
Section 3

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The management of TrustCo Bank Corp NY is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. TrustCo’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has completed an assessment of TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” promulgated by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, commonly referred to as the “COSO” criteria. Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2007, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 has been audited by KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

/s/ Robert J. McCormick
President and
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Robert T. Cushing
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Scot R. Salvador
Executive Vice President and
Chief Banking Officer


February 26, 2008

 
 

 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
TrustCo Bank Corp NY:

We have audited TrustCo Bank Corp NY’s (the Company’s) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, based on the assessed risk. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, TrustCo Bank Corp NY maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of condition of TrustCo Bank Corp NY and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and our report dated February 26, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Albany, New York
February 26, 2008
 
 
 

 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
TrustCo Bank Corp NY:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition of TrustCo Bank Corp NY and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TrustCo Bank Corp NY and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendement of FASB Statement No. 115” as of January 1, 2007.  Also, the Company adopted SFAS No. 158 “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendement of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” as of December 31, 2006, and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Missatements in Current Year Fianancial Statements” as of January 1, 2006.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 26, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Albany, New York
February 26, 2008

 
 

 
 
                 
                   
                   
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
                   
Interest and dividend income:
                 
Interest and fees on loans
  $ 120,461       104,400       86,636  
Interest and dividends on securities available for sale:
                       
U. S. Treasuries and agencies and government sponsored enterprises
    13,183       40,858       34,506  
States and political subdivisions
    5,698       5,762       6,301  
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
    7,553       8,661       9,738  
Other
    684       614       984  
Total interest and dividends on securities available for sale
    27,118       55,895       51,529  
                         
                         
Interest on trading securities - U. S. government sponsored enterprises
    22,432        -       -  
Interest on held to maturity securities - U. S. government sponsored enterprises
    542        -        -  
Interest on federal funds sold and other short-term investments
    18,865       8,912       12,009  
Total interest income
    189,418       169,207       150,174  
                         
Interest expense:
                       
Interest on deposits
    89,261       67,228       43,626  
Interest on short-term borrowings
    3,721       3,708       2,026  
Interest on long-term debt
    2       4       5  
Total interest expense
    92,984       70,940       45,657  
                         
Net interest income
    96,434       98,267       104,517  
Provision (credit) for loan losses
    2,500       (3,575 )     (6,260 )
Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan losses
    93,934       101,842       110,777  
     
Noninterest income:
   
Trust department income
    5,743       5,463       6,009  
Fees for services to customers
    9,498       8,572       8,171  
Net trading gains
    891       -       -  
Net gain (loss) on securities transactions
    217       (596 )     5,999  
Other 
    1,413       1,420       5,110  
Total noninterest income
    17,762       14,859       25,289  
 
                       
Noninterest expenses:
                       
Salaries and employee benefits
    20,268       18,427       18,663  
Net occupancy expense
    10,164       7,947       7,308  
Equipment expense
    3,369       3,042       2,721  
Professional services
    4,152       3,925       3,372  
Outsourced Services
    4,309       4,246       4,093  
Advertising expense
    2,343       2,277       1,415  
Other real estate (income) expense, net
    (11 )     27       (617 )
Other
    8,999       9,171       9,277  
Total noninterest expenses
    53,593       49,062       46,232  
                         
Income before income taxes
    58,103       67,639       89,834  
Income taxes
    18,636       22,314       30,845  
Net income
  $ 39,467       45,325       58,989  
                         
Earnings per share:
                       
Basic
  $ 0.525       0.605       0.787  
Diluted
  $ 0.525       0.603       0.782  

See accompanying notes to consolidated interim financial statements.



Consolidated Statements of Condition
 
             
             
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
As of December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
             
  ASSETS
           
             
Cash and due from banks
  $ 58,156       47,889  
Federal funds sold and other short term investments
    286,764       243,449  
Total cash and cash equivalents
    344,920       291,338  
Trading securities
    465,151       -  
Securities available for sale
    578,892       1,048,270  
Held to maturity securities ($15,175 fair value at December 31, 2007)
    15,000       -  
Loans, net
    1,934,914       1,762,514  
Less: Allowance for loan losses
    34,651       35,616  
Net loans
    1,900,263       1,726,898  
Bank premises and equipment
    29,193       24,050  
Other assets
    44,132       70,631  
                 
Total assets
  $ 3,377,551       3,161,187  
                 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
               
Deposits:
               
Demand
  $ 262,863       259,401  
Savings
    609,064       662,310  
Interest-bearing checking accounts
    293,027       290,784  
Money market deposit accounts
    341,790       310,719  
Certificates of deposit (in denominations of $100,000 or more)
    390,328       299,813  
Other time accounts
    1,123,226       976,356  
Total deposits
    3,020,298       2,799,383  
Short-term borrowings
    92,220       95,507  
Long-term debt
    29       59  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    27,936       26,715  
Total liabilities
    3,140,483       2,921,664  
                 
  SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
               
                 
                 
Capital stock; $1 par value. 150,000,000 shares authorized, 82,373,165 and 82,149,776 shares issued at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively
    82,373       82,150  
Surplus
    121,961       119,313  
Undivided profits
    93,099       110,304  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
    7,230       (2,928 )
Treasury stock; 7,047,297 and  7,276,450 shares, at cost, at December 31, 2007and 2006, respectively
    (67,595 )     (69,316 )
Total shareholders' equity
    237,068       239,523  
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
  $ 3,377,551       3,161,187  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 

 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
                                     
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
Three Years Ended December 31, 2007
 
                     
Accumulated
                   
                     
Other
                   
                     
Comprehensive
                   
   
Capital
         
Undivided
   
Income
   
Comprehensive
   
Treasury
       
   
Stock
   
Surplus
   
Profits
   
(Loss)
   
Income (Loss)
   
Stock
   
Total
 
                                           
Beginning balance, January 1, 2005
  $ 81,728       114,218       90,018       4,459             (64,591 )     225,832  
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
Net Income - 2005
    -       -       58,989       -       58,989       -       58,989  
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
                                                       
Unrealized net holding loss on securities available-for-sale arising during the period, net of tax (pretax loss of $11,487)
    -       -       -       -       (6,905 )     -       -  
Reclassification adjustment for net gain realized in net income during the year (pretax gain $5,999)
    -       -       -       -       (3,608 )     -       -  
Other comprehensive loss
    -       -       -       (10,513 )     (10,513 )     -       (10,513 )
Comprehensive income
                                    48,476                  
Cash dividend declared, $.610 per share
    -       -       (45,692 )     -               -       (45,692 )
Stock options exercised and related tax benefits
    392       3,426       -       -               -       3,818  
Stock based compensation expense
    -       77       -       -               -       77  
Treasury stock purchased (1,172,366 shares)
    -       -       -       -               (14,846 )     (14,846 )
Sale of treasury stock (1,016,367 shares)
    -       49       -       -               10,947       10,996  
Ending balance, December 31, 2005
    82,120       117,770       103,315       (6,054 )             (68,490 )     228,661  
Adjustment to January 1, 2006 beginning balance for adoption of SAB No. 108, net of tax
    -       -       9,571       -               -       9,571  
January 1, 2006 beginning balance, as adjusted
    82,120       117,770       112,886       (6,054 )             (68,490 )     238,232  
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
Net Income - 2006
    -       -       45,325       -       45,325       -       45,325  
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
                                                       
Previously unrecognized overfunded position in pension and post retirement benefit plans, net of tax (pre-tax overfunded of $12,096)
    -       -       -       7,272       -       -       7,272  
Unrealized net holding loss on securities available-for-sale arising during the period, net of tax (pretax loss of $7,492)
    -       -       -       -       (4,504 )     -       -  
Reclassification adjustment for net loss realized in net income during the year (pretax loss $596)
    -       -       -       -       358       -       -  
Other comprehensive loss
    -       -       -       (4,146 )     (4,146 )     -       (4,146 )
Comprehensive income
                                    41,179                  
Cash dividend declared, $.640 per share
    -       -       (47,907 )     -               -       (47,907 )
Stock options exercised and related tax benefits
    30       554       -       -               -       584  
Treasury stock purchased (733,413 shares)
    -       -       -       -               (8,801 )     (8,801 )
Sale of treasury stock (800,746 shares)
    -       989       -       -               7,975       8,964  
Ending balance, December 31, 2006
    82,150       119,313       110,304       (2,928 )             (69,316 )     239,523  
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 159, net of tax
    -       -       (8,606 )     8,606               -       -  
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
Net Income - 2007
    -       -       39,467       -       39,467       -       39,467  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
                                                       
Change in overfunded position in pension and post retirement benefit plans arising during the year, net of tax (pre-tax overfunded of $1,673)
    -       -       -       -       1,005       -       -  
Amortization of prior service cost on pension and post retirement plans, net of tax (pretax of $484)
    -       -       -       -       (291 )     -       -  
Unrealized net holding gain on securities available-for-sale arising during the period, net of tax (pretax gain of $1,610)
    -       -       -       -       969       -       -  
Reclassification adjustment for net gain realized in net income during the year (pretax gain $217)
    -       -       -       -       (131 )     -       -  
Other comprehensive income
    -       -       -       1,552       1,552       -       1,552  
Comprehensive income
                                    41,019                  
Cash dividend declared, $.640 per share
    -       -       (48,066 )     -               -       (48,066 )
Stock options exercised and related tax benefits
    223       1,893       -       -               -       2,116  
Treasury stock purchased (569,348 shares)
    -       -       -       -               (5,908 )     (5,908 )
Sale of treasury stock (798,501 shares)
    -       669       -       -               7,629       8,298  
Stock based compensation expense
    -       86       -       -               -       86  
Ending balance, December 31, 2007
  $ 82,373       121,961       93,099       7,230               (67,595 )     237,068  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
 

 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
   
Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2006
 
                   
Increase /(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
                 
                   
Cash flows from operating activities:
                 
Net income
  $ 39,467       45,325       58,989  
                         
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    3,116       2,671       2,690  
Gain on sale of other real estate owned
    (165 )     (47 )     (690 )
Provision (credit) for loan losses
    2,500       (3,575 )     (6,260 )
Deferred tax expense
    1,782       2,004       2,874  
Stock based compensation expense
    86       -       -  
Net loss (gain) on sale of bank premises and equipment
    -       131       (665 )
Net (gain) loss on sale of securities available for sale
    (217 )     596       (5,999 )
Proceeds from sales and calls of trading securities
    577,906       -       -  
Purchases of trading securities
    (915,255 )     -       -  
Proceeds from maturities of trading securities
    375,334       -       -  
Net trading gains
    (891 )     -       -  
Decrease in taxes receivable
    20,087       7,265       2,760  
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable
    3,110       (2,159 )     (3,761 )
Increase in interest payable
    596       825       659  
Decrease in other assets
    1,879       (5,212 )     (5,289 )
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities
    625       561       (665 )
                         
Total adjustments
    70,493       3,060       (14,346 )
Net cash provided by operating activities
    109,960       48,385       44,643  
                         
Cash flows from investing activities:
                       
                         
Proceeds from sales and calls of securities available for sale
    99,978       97,842       275,855  
Purchases of securities available for sale
    (198,034 )     (95,314 )     (477,210 )
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale
    66,799       25,786       1,781  
Proceeds from calls of held to maturity securities
    10,000       -       -  
Purchases of held to maturity securities
    (25,000 )     -       -  
Net increase in loans
    (176,202 )     (290,581 )     (228,457 )
Proceeds from dispositions of other real estate owned
    302       178       723  
Proceeds from dispositions of bank premises and equipment
    -       73       2,576  
Purchases of bank premises and equipment
    (8,259 )     (5,191 )     (3,855 )
Net cash used in investing activities
    (230,416 )     (267,207 )     (428,587 )
                         
                         
Cash flows from financing activities:
                       
                         
Net increase in deposits
    220,915       236,896       35,385  
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings
    (3,287 )     7,572       9,956  
Repayment of long-term debt
    (30 )     (28 )     (27 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and related tax benefits
    2,116       584       3,818  
Proceeds from sale of treasury stock
    8,298       8,964       10,996  
Purchase of treasury stock
    (5,908 )     (8,801 )     (14,846 )
Dividends paid
    (48,066 )     (47,890 )     (44,905 )
                         
Net cash provided by financing activities
    174,038       197,297       377  
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    53,582       (21,525 )     (383,567 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    291,338       312,863       696,430  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 344,920       291,338       312,863  
                         
                         
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
                       
Cash paid during the year for:
                       
Interest paid
  $ 92,388       70,115       44,998  
Income taxes (refunded) paid
    (1,512 )     14,999       27,388  
Non cash investing and financing activites:
                       
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned
    337       200       56  
Increase in dividends payable
    -       17       787  
Change in unrealized loss on securities available for sale-gross of deferred taxes (excluding $14,313 unrealized loss transferred to undivided profits in 2007 from adoption of SFAS No. 159), net of reclassification adjustment
    1,393       (6,896 )     (17,486 )
                         
Change in deferred tax effect on unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment
    (555 )     2,750       6,973  
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense, net of tax
    -       -       77  
Amortization of prior service cost on pension and post retirement plans
    (484 )     -       -  
Change in deferred tax effect of amortization of prior service cost
    193       -       -  
Securities available for sale transferred to trading securities
    516,558       -       -  
Cumulative effect of the adoption of SFAS No.
                       
159-net of deferred taxes ($14,313 gross of deferred taxes)
    8,606       -       -  
Change in overfunded portion of SFAS No. 158 - gross
    1,673       12,096       -  
Deferred tax effect of change in overfunded portion of SFAS No. 158
    (668 )     (4,824 )     -  
Cumulative effect of the adoption of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108-gross of deferred taxes
    -       15,877       -  
Deferred tax effect of the adoption of Staff
                       
Accounting Bulletin No. 108
    -       (6,306 )     -  


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 
 

 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) Basis of Presentation
The accounting and financial reporting policies of TrustCo Bank Corp NY (the Company or TrustCo), ORE Subsidiary Corp., Trustco Bank (referred to as Trustco Bank or the Bank), and its wholly owned
subsidiary, Trustco Vermont Investment Company, and its subsidiary Trustco Realty Corporation conform to general practices within the banking industry and are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. A description of the more significant policies follows.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the subsidiaries after elimination of all significant intercompany accounts and transactions.

Trading securities
Trading securities are recorded at their fair value with the current period change in fair value recorded as net trading gains and losses on the consolidated statements of income.

Securities Available for Sale
Securities available for sale are carried at approximate fair value with any unrealized appreciation or depreciation of value, net of tax, included as an element of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in shareholders’ equity. Management maintains an available for sale portfolio in order to provide maximum flexibility in balance sheet management. The designation of available for sale is made at the time of purchase based upon management’s intent to hold the securities for an indefinite period of time. These securities, however, are available for sale in response to changes in market interest rates, related changes in liquidity needs, or changes in the availability of and yield on alternative investments. Unrealized losses on securities that reflect a decline in value which is other than temporary, if any, are charged to income. Nonmarketable equity securities (principally stock of the Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Home Loan Bank, both of which are required holdings for the Company) are included in securities available
for sale at cost since there is no readily available
fair value.
The cost of debt securities available for sale is adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount using the interest method.
Gains and losses on the sale of securities available for sale are based on the amortized cost of the specific security sold at trade date.

Held to Maturity
Debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity are classified as held to maturity and are carried at their remaining unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized premiums or unaccreted discounts. Premiums are amortized and discounts are accreted using the interest method over the estimated remaining term of the underlying security.

 
 

 
 
Based on evaluation of available evidence, including recent changes in market interest rates, credit rating information and information obtained from regulatory filings, management believes that any decline in fair value for these securities is temporary.  Should the impairment of any of these securities become other than temporary, the cost basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the other –than-temporary impairment is identified.


Loans
Loans are carried at the principal amount outstanding net of unearned income and unamortized loan fees and costs, which are recognized as adjustments to interest income over the applicable loan term.
Nonperforming loans include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans, and loans which are three payments or more past due and still accruing interest. Generally, loans are placed in nonaccrual status either due to the delinquent status of principal and/or interest payments, or a judgment by management that, although payments of principal and/or interest are current, such action is prudent. Future payments received on nonperforming loans are recorded as interest income or principal reductions based upon management’s ultimate expectation for collection. Loans may be removed from nonaccrual status when they become current as to principal and interest and have demonstrated a sustained ability to make loan payments in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Loans may also be removed from nonaccrual status when, in the opinion of management, the loan is expected to be fully collectable as to principal and interest.
Impaired loans have been defined as commercial and commercial real estate loans in nonaccrual status and restructured loans. Income recognition for impaired loans is consistent with income recognition for nonaccruing loans.

Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate by management to provide for probable loan losses based on consideration of the credit risk of the loan portfolio, including a review of past experience, current economic conditions, and underlying collateral value. The allowance is increased by provisions charged against income, or decreased by credits added to income, and reduced/increased by net charge offs/recoveries.
In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Company to change the allowance based on their judgments of information available to them at the time of their examination.

Bank Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed on either the straight-line or accelerated methods over the remaining useful lives of the assets; generally 20 to 40 years for premises and leasehold improvements and 3 to 7 years for furniture and equipment.

Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned are assets acquired through foreclosures on loans.
Foreclosed assets held for sale are recorded on an individual basis at the lower of (1) fair value minus estimated costs to sell or (2) “cost” (which is the fair value at initial foreclosure). When a property is acquired, the excess of the loan balance over fair value is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent write downs and gains on sale are included in noninterest expense.

 
 

 
 
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are recorded for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns based upon enacted tax laws and rates. Deferred tax assets are recognized subject to management’s judgment that realization is more likely than not.

Dividend Restrictions
Banking regulations restrict the amount of cash dividends which may be paid during a year by Trustco Bank to the Company without the written consent of the appropriate bank regulatory agency. Based on these restrictions, during 2008 Trustco Bank can pay cash dividends to the Company equal to year-to-date net profits, as defined.

Benefit Plans
The Company has a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of its employees. The benefits are based on years of service and the employee’s compensation. This plan was frozen as of December 31, 2006.
The Company has a postretirement benefit plan that permits retirees under age 65 to participate in the Company’s medical plan by which retirees pay all of their premiums. At age 65, the Company provides access to a Medicare Supplemental program for retirees.
As of December 31, 2006 the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158 “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” that required the Company to recognize on the Consolidated Statement of Condition the funded status of the pension plan and post retirement plan. This resulted in an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $7.3 million and an increase in other assets of $12.1 million.

Stock Option Plans
The Company has stock option plans for officers and directors. Effective January 1, 2006 the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised) “Share Based Payment” (SFAS 123R) using the modified prospective method. Previously the Company had adopted the disclosure only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS No. 148”).
The Company's stock option plans were previously accounted for in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB Opinion 25”) and as such, no compensation expense was ordinarily recorded for these plans.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the accelerated vesting of all outstanding unvested stock options to purchase shares of common stock. These options were previously awarded to executive officers and employees under the 1995 and 2004 Stock Option Plans. By accelerating the vesting of these options the Company estimates that approximately $1.3 million of future compensation expense, net of tax, was eliminated which would have been recorded under SFAS 123R subsequent to its adoption on January 1, 2006. The stock option accelerations were done in anticipation of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006.
Options to purchase 882,100 shares of the Company’s common stock, which would otherwise have vested from time to time over the four years subsequent to 2005, became immediately vested and exercisable as a result of this action. The number of shares and exercise prices of the options subject to the acceleration remained unchanged. Also, all of the other terms of the options remain the same. The Company recorded $127 thousand of expense related to this acceleration based upon an analysis performed in accordance with APB Opinion 25.
The accelerated options included 749,500 options held by executive officers and 132,600 options held by other employees. Based upon the Company’s closing stock price of $12.76 per share on the date of accelerated vesting certain of the options were below and others above the closing market price as follows:

 
 

 
 
Grant
 
Accelerated
   
Exercise
 
Date
 
Vesting Shares
   
Price
 
2005
    411,200     $ 12.15  
2004
    394,500     $ 13.55  
2002
    76,400     $ 11.83  
      882,100          

    The decision to accelerate the vesting of these options was made primarily to reduce non-cash compensation expense that would have been recorded in the statement of income in future periods upon the adoption of SFAS 123R.
    Had compensation expense for 2005 for the Company’s stock option plans been determined consistent with SFAS 123, the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been as follows:

(dollars in thousands,
     
except per share data)
     
Net income:
     
As reported
  $ 58,989  
         
Deduct: total stock-based compensation expense, net of related tax effects
    (2,035 )
Pro forma net income
  $ 56,954  
Earnings per share:
       
Basic - as reported
  $ 0.787  
Basis - pro forma
    0.760  
Diluted - as reported
    0.782  
Diluted - pro forma
    0.755  

The weighted average fair value of each option as of the grant date, estimated using the Black-Scholes pricing model and calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 123 was as follows for options granted in 2005:

             
   
Employees'
   
Directors'
 
   
Plan
   
Plan
 
             
    $ 1.675       1.480  


The following assumptions were utilized in the calculation of the fair value of the options under SFAS No. 123 for options granted in 2005:
 
             
   
Employees'
   
Directors'
 
   
Plan
   
Plan
 
             
             
Expected dividend yield:
    4.95 %     4.95  
Risk-free interest rate:
    3.91       3.76  
Expected volatility rate:
    21.25       19.76  
Expected lives
    7.5
years
  6.0  
 
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, taking into consideration the effect of any dilutive stock options.

Reclassification of Prior Year Statements
It is the Company’s policy to reclassify prior year consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.

Segment Reporting
The Company’s operations are exclusively in the financial services industry and include the provision of traditional banking services. Management evaluates the performance of the Company based on only one business segment, that of community banking. The Company operates primarily in the geographical region of Upstate New York with new Company operations in Florida and the mid-Hudson valley region of New York. In the opinion of management, the Company does not have any other reportable segments as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, “Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company classifies cash on hand, cash due from banks, federal funds sold, and other short-term investments as cash and cash equivalents for disclosure purposes.

Trust Assets
Assets under management by the Trust Department are not included on the Company’s consolidated financial statements because the Trust Department holds these assets in a fiduciary capacity. Trust assets under management as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are $916 million and $901 million, respectively.

Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income represents the sum of net income and items of other comprehensive income or loss, which are reported directly in shareholders’ equity, net of tax, such as the change in net unrealized gain or loss on securities available for sale and changes in the overfunded position of the pension and post retirement benefit plans. The Company has reported comprehensive income and  its components in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity. Accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, which is a component of shareholders’ equity, represents the net unrealized gain or loss on securities available for sale, net of tax and the overfunded position in the Company’s pension plan and post retirement benefit plans, net of tax.

 
 

 
 
(2) Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

(a) Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, and No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”.

Effective January 1, 2007 TrustCo elected early adoption of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (SFAS No. 159), and No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157).  SFAS No. 159, which was issued in February 2007, generally permits the measurement of selected eligible financial instruments at fair value at specified election dates.  SFAS No. 157 generally establishes the definition of fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurement.  This statement establishes a hierarchy of the levels of fair value measurement techniques.  Upon adoption of SFAS No. 159, TrustCo elected to apply the fair value option for certain U.S. government sponsored enterprises securities with lower yields, which generally had longer duration, that were classified in the available for sale portfolio totaling approximately $517 million ($502 million at fair value).  Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 159, the Company intended to hold these securities until a market price recovery or possibly to maturity.  The Company changed its intent with respect to these securities to enable the Company to record these losses directly to undivided profits rather than current income based on the transition provisions of SFAS No. 159 by electing the fair value option for these securities.  As a result, unrealized losses, net of taxes, of $8.6 million were directly recorded to undivided profits. This charge to undivided profits had no overall impact on total shareholders’ equity because the fair value adjustment had previously been included as an element of shareholders’ equity in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) account, net of tax.

As a result of TrustCo’s fair value measurement election for the above financial instruments, TrustCo recorded $3.4 million of pre-tax unrealized trading gains in its first quarter earnings for the change in fair value of such instruments from the effective election date of January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007.  Additionally, TrustCo sold in the second quarter all of these securities and recognized pre-tax trading losses of $2.8 million in the second quarter.  While the proceeds from this sale were initially invested in federal funds sold, the Company re-invested these proceeds by purchasing securities, primarily U.S. government sponsored enterprises, for its trading portfolio.  As of December 31, 2007 $465 million of U.S. government sponsored enterprises securities were held in the trading portfolio.  TrustCo believes that its adoption of the standard will have a positive impact on its ability to manage its investment portfolio because it will enable the Company to sell the securities that it has elected the fair value option for without recording other-than-temporary impairment on the remainder of the available-for-sale portfolio.  Additionally, recording the unrealized losses on these securities directly to undivided profits as part of the transition adjustment will benefit future periods’ net income because the January 1, 2007 unrealized loss will not be realized in the income statement when the security is subsequently sold.

As already stated, the Company recorded a $8.6 million charge, net of tax, to undivided profits as a result of adopting SFAS No. 159 as of January 1, 2007.  Had the Company not adopted this new accounting standard and reclassified the available for sale securities to trading account assets as of that date, the charge to capital would have been recorded as a charge to net income.

 
 

 
 
The following table presents information relative to the assets identified for the fair value option of accounting as of the initial implementation date of January 1, 2007:

   
Statement of
   
Net Loss recognized
   
Statement of
 
   
Condition 12/31/06
   
in undivided profits
   
Condition after adoption of Fair
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
Prior to adoption
   
upon adoption
   
Value Option
 
                   
Securities available for sale transferred to trading account assets:
                 
Amortized cost
  $ 516,558       (14,313 )     502,245  
Unrealized depreciation
    (14,313 )     14,313       -  
Net transferred to trading account assets
  $ 502,245       -       502,245  

The securities transferred to trading account assets as of January 1, 2007 were included previously in the available for sale portfolio as Government sponsored enterprises.

TrustCo determined that it would be appropriate to account for certain of the Government sponsored enterprises securities at fair value based upon the relatively low interest rate on these bonds.  Government sponsored enterprises bonds held by Trustco Bank in the available for sale portfolio as of January 1, 2007 under a predetermined interest rate (generally 5.45% or below) were identified as bonds to be recorded at fair value (the bonds also had an average life to maturity of approximately 9 years).  Interest on trading account securities are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income based upon the coupon of the underlying bond and the par value of the securities.  Unrealized gains and losses on the trading account securities are recognized based upon the fair value at period end compared to the beginning of that period.

After the adoption of SFAS 159 as of January 1, 2007 there were $232.3 million of remaining Government sponsored enterprises obligations classified as available for sale securities which had gross unrealized losses of $3.3 million.  These securities were primarily higher yielding assets and generally had shorter terms to final maturity.  It is management’s intention that Government sponsored enterprises securities that remain in the available for sale portfolio after the adoption of SFAS 159 will be held to generate relatively higher yields or provide liquidity in the form of maturing or called securities.  Upon adoption of SFAS 159, the yield on the securities in the available for sale portfolio ranged from 4.30% to 5.82%, and had an average term to maturity of 7 years ranging from 2007 – 2019 final maturity.

The following tables presents the financial instruments recorded at fair value by the Company as of December 31, 2007.

(dollars in thousands)
 
Fair value measurements at December 31, 2007 using:
             
                               
   
Total carrying
                         
   
amount in
               
Quoted prices in
       
   
statement of
   
Statement 107 Fair
   
Fair value
   
active markets for
   
Significant other
 
   
financial condition
   
Value Estimate
   
measurement
   
identical assets
   
observable input
 
Description
 
as of 12/31/07
   
as of 12/31/07
   
as of 12/31/07
   
(Level 1)
   
(Level 2)
 
Securities available for sale
  $ 578,892       578,892       578,892       -       578,892  
Trading securities
    465,151       465,151       465,151       -       465,151  
Other real estate owned
    293       293       293       -       293  
 
 
Change in fair value for the 12 month period
 
   
from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007 for
 
   
items measured at
 
   
fair value pursuant to
 
   
election of the Fair Value Option
 
             
         
Total Changes
 
   
Unrealized
   
Included in
 
   
Trading
   
Values Included in
 
   
Gains
   
Period Earnings
 
             
Securities available-for-sale
  $ -       -  
Trading account securities
    891       891  
Other real estate owned
    -       -  
 
Securities available for sale and trading account securities are fair valued utilizing an independent bond pricing service.  The pricing service uses a variety of techniques to arrive at fair value including market maker bids and quotes of significantly similar securities and pricing models.  Inputs to the pricing models include recent trades, benchmark interest rates, spreads and actual and projected cash flows.  Other real estate owned fair value is determined by observable comparable sales and property valuation techniques.


(b) FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” as amended by FSP No. 48-1 “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48.”

TrustCo adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”) as of January 1, 2007.  FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken on a tax return.  As a result of the Company’s adoption of FIN 48, there were no required adjustments to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Trustco also adopted FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 48-1 “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FSP 48-1)”. FSP 48-1 provides guidance on how to determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. FSP 48-1 was effective retroactively to January 1, 2007 and did not significantly impact the Corporation’s financial statements.

 
 

 
 
TrustCo has implemented certain tax return positions that have not been fully recognized for financial statement purposes based upon management’s evaluation of the probability of the benefit being realized.  For 2007, the Company has recognized interest expense on the uncertain tax position as an element of other expenses and nothing for potential tax penalties.

For the twelve month period ended December 31, 2007 the unrecognized tax benefit and change in that benefit from the beginning of the year is as follows:


 
(Dollars in thousands)
     
       
Balance January 1, 2007
  $ 3,392  
Additional unrecognized benefit for the period from 1/1/07 to 12/31/07
    631  
         
Balance December 31, 2007
  $ 4,023  

If the unrecognized tax benefit were to be recognized for financial reporting purposes the impact would be to decrease total tax expense by the balance not previously recognized (as of December 31, 2007 that amount would be $2.6 million, after tax).  Interest expense of $347 thousand has been recorded during 2007 and included in accrued expenses and other liabilities (no penalties have been accrued).  The total accrual for interest expense included in the statement of financial condition is $736 thousand and is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities.

Open Federal tax years are 2004 through 2007, and for New York State they are 2003 through 2007.  The 2006 state and federal tax returns were filed in the third quarter of 2007. The IRS is currently examining the 2004 and 2005 returns and any adjustments are not expected to materially impact reported tax amounts.

The New York State tax returns are currently under audit for the periods that the uncertain tax return position was initiated. The Company does not believe the unrecognized tax benefit will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months unless the New York State tax return audits are completed, and an unfavorable adjustment is recognized.  It is reasonably possible that a reduction in the estimate may occur, however, a quantification of a reasonable range cannot be determined.


(c) Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R) “(SFAS No. 158). For defined benefit and post retirement plans, SFAS No. 158 requires that the funded status be recognized in the statement of financial condition, that assets and obligations that determine funded status be measured as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year, and that changes in funded status be measured as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year, and that changes in funded status be recognized in comprehensive income in the year the changes occur. SFAS No. 158 does not change the amount of net periodic benefit cost (income) included in net income or address measurement issues related to defined benefit or post-retirement plans. The requirement to recognize funded status was effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure assets and obligations as of the employer’s fiscal year was effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The unrecognized overfunded pre-tax components of the defined benefit pension plan and the retiree medical plan of $12.1 million were recorded on the consolidated statement of financial condition at December 31, 2006. Balances previously  recognized in the financial statements were adjusted to reflect those overfunded positions with the offset as an adjustment to the deferred income tax accounts and to accumulated other comprehensive income, as an element of shareholders' equity.

 
 

 


(d) Prior Year Immaterial Uncorrected Misstatements
In September 2006, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (SAB No. 108). SAB No. 108 requires quantification of prior year immaterial uncorrected misstatements under both the “rollover approach” and the “iron curtain approach.” The “rollover approach” quantifies a misstatement based on the amount of the error originating in the current year income statement, but ignores the effects of correcting the portion of the current year balance sheet misstatement that originated in prior years. The “iron curtain approach” quantifies a misstatement based on the effects of correcting the misstatement existing in the balance sheet at the end of the current year, irrespective of the misstatement’s year(s) of origination. Prior to SAB No. 108, the Company utilized the rollover approach when quantifying misstatements. The provisions of SAB No. 108 were required to be applied to financial statements for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006.
As a result of the adoption of SAB No. 108, TrustCo recognized a reduction in other liabilities and a decrease in the allowance for loan losses, as described below. These entries were recorded as adjustments of the beginning of the year 2006 opening balances for these accounts and the impact, net of tax, was reflected in shareholders’ equity as a cumulative effect adjustment to undivided profits, a component of shareholders’ equity.
The entries to reduce other liabilities were in connection with the following items:
Approximately $3.0 million of unused accrued interest for potential tax settlements related to certain tax positions, including the timing of loan charge offs for tax return purposes, in connection with mergers in 1985 and 1991.
Approximately $1.9 million of unused accrued expenses related to credit risk on long term letters of credit acquired in a 1991 aquisition. These letters of credit generally expired through the mid 1990’s.
Approximately $1.4 million in unused accrued expenses related to the anticipated termination of a computer services contract in the early 1990s. Negotiations subsequently resolved the matter without requiring full payment.
Approximately $2.0 million in unused accrued expenses related to credit risk associated with unadvanced amounts on credit cards, not reversed as this portfolio was paid down.
These misstatements were not material to the consolidated financial statements in each of the respective years affected.
The reduction of the allowance for loan losses was the result of excess provisions for loan losses recorded primarily in the 1990s. This misstatement primarily occurred as a result of the Company’s extrapolation of historical loan loss experience over the future expected lives of the respective loan portfolios (also known as “life of the loan” approach), and the Company did not consider qualitative factors which impacts the credit quality of the respective loan categories.  The misstatement of the provision for loan losses was not considered material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in any of the respective years impacted by these misstatements.
Under the rollover approach described above, management did not consider these items to be material to the consolidated financial statements. However, under the dual approach required by SAB No. 108, these items were adjusted effective as of January 1, 2006.

 
 

 


In accordance with the transition provisions of SAB No. 108, the Company recorded the cumulative effect of these items as an adjustment to its opening undivided profits for fiscal 2006, net of their respective tax effects.

(3) Balances at Other Banks
The Company is required to maintain certain reserves of vault cash and/or deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank. The amount of this reserve requirement, included in cash and due from banks, was approximately $21.8 million and $21.6 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.


(4) Investment Securities

(a)Trading securities
The fair value of trading securities at December 31, 2007 are as follows:

(dollars in thousands)
     
       
Government Sponsored enterprises
  $ 465,151  
Total trading securities
  $ 465,151  
 
Included in the 2007 consolidated statements of income are $189 thousand of net trading gains and losses related to trading account assets at December 31, 2007.

(b) Securities available for sale

The amortized cost and fair value of the securities available for sale are as follows:

(dollars in thousands)
 
December 31, 2007
 
         
Gross
   
Gross
       
   
Amortized
   
Unrealized
   
Unrealized
   
Fair
 
   
Cost
   
Gains
   
Losses
   
Value
 
Government Sponsored enterprises
  $ 289,035       659       4       289,690  
State and political subdivisions
    125,219       4,069       17       129,271  
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
    154,337       399       5,878       148,858  
Other
    650       -       2       648  
Total debt securities
    569,241       5,127       5,901       568,467  
Equity securities
    10,909       -       484       10,425  
Total securities available for sale
  $ 580,150       5,127       6,385       578,892  

(dollars in thousands)
 
December 31, 2006
 
         
Gross
   
Gross
       
   
Amortized
   
Unrealized
   
Unrealized
   
Fair
 
   
Cost
   
Gains
   
Losses
   
Value
 
U.S. Treasuries and agencies
  $ 999       -       -       999  
Government Sponsored enterprises
    751,539       -       17,990       733,549  
State and political subdivisions
    129,633       3,524       277       132,880  
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
    170,450       336       2,890       167,896  
Other
    680       -       8       672  
Total debt securities
    1,053,301       3,860       21,165       1,035,996  
Equity securities
    11,933       341       -       12,274  
Total securities available for sale
  $ 1,065,234       4,201       21,165       1,048,270  
 
Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock included in equity securities at December 31, 2007 and 2006, was $5.6 million and $5.1 million, respectively.
The following table distributes the debt securities included in the available for sale portfolio as of December 31, 2007, based on the securities’ final maturity (mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are stated using an estimated average life):

(dollars in thousands)
 
Amortized
   
Fair
 
   
Cost
   
Value
 
Due in one year or less
  $ 48,696       48,740  
Due in one year through five years
    135,111       135,390  
Due after five years through ten years
    146,266       144,479  
Due after ten years
    239,168       239,858  
    $ 569,241       568,467  

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because of securities prepayments and the right of certain issuers to call or prepay their obligations without penalty.
Gross unrealized losses on investment securities available for sale and the related fair values aggregated by the length of time that individual securities have been in an unrealized loss position, were as follows:

(dollars in thousands)
 
December 31, 2007
 
   
Less than
   
12 months
             
   
12 months
   
or more
   
Total
 
         
Gross
         
Gross
         
Gross
 
   
Fair
   
Unreal.
   
Fair
   
Unreal.
   
Fair
   
Unreal.
 
   
Value
   
Loss
   
Value
   
Loss
   
Value
   
Loss
 
Government sponsored enterprises
  $ 4,996       4       -       -       4,996       4  
States and political subdivisions
    2,606       10       3,369       7       5,975       17  
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
    47,778       1,403       71,376       4,475       119,154       5,878  
Other
    5,280       483       598       2       5,878       485  
Total
  $ 60,660       1,900       75,343       4,484       136,003       6,384  

(dollars in thousands)
             
December 31, 2006
             
   
Less than
         
12 months
                   
   
12 months
         
or more
         
Total
       
         
Gross
         
Gross
         
Gross
 
   
Fair
   
Unreal.
   
Fair
   
Unreal.
   
Fair
   
Unreal.
 
   
Value
   
Loss
   
Value
   
Loss
   
Value
   
Loss
 
Government sponsored enterprises
  $ 50,878       121       668,675       17,869       719,553       17,990  
States and political subdivisions
    12,444       65       19,379       212       31,823       277  
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
    16,930       132       126,956       2,758       143,886       2,890  
Other
    -       -       592       8       592       8  
Total
  $ 80,252       318       815,602       20,847       895,854       21,165  
 
U.S. Treasuries and agencies,Government sponsored enterprises, and States and political subdivisions: The unrealized losses on these investments were caused by market interest rate increases. The  contractual terms of these investments require the issuer to settle the securities at par upon maturity of the investment. Because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a market price recovery or possibly to maturity and the Company has no current intent to sell these securities, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations: The unrealized losses on investments in mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations were caused by market interest rate increases. The contractual cash flows of these securities or the underlying loans are guaranteed by various government agencies or government sponsored enterprises. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in market interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a market price recovery or possibly to maturity and the Company has no intent to sell these securities, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

 
 

 


Equity Securities: The unrealized losses on these equity securities comprised mainly of financial institution stocks were caused by market decreases. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a market price recovery and the Company has no intent to sell these securities.  These securities are not considered other-than-temporarily imparied.
The proceeds from sales and calls of securities, gross realized gains and gross realized losses from sales and calls during 2007, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:

(dollars in thousands)
       
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Proceeds
  $ 99,978       97,842       275,855  
Gross realized gains
    236       55       6,297  
Gross realized losses
    19       651       298  

The amount of securities available for sale that have been pledged to secure short-term borrowings and for other purposes required by law amounted to $180.9 million and $138.5 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The Company has the following balances of securities available for sale as of December 31, 2007 that represent greater than 10% of shareholders equity:

(dollars in thousands)
 
Amortized
   
Fair
 
   
Cost
   
Value
 
Federal Home Loan Bank
  $ 455,098       455,416  
Federal National Mortgage Association
    91,141       91,129  
Federal Home Loan
               
Mortgage Corporation
    222,800       222,970  
Fereral Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
    40,028       40,028  

(c) Held to maturity securities

The amortized cost and fair value of the held to maturity securities are as follows:

(dollars in thousands)
 
December 31, 2007
 
         
Gross
   
Gross
       
   
Amortized
   
Unrealized
   
Unrealized
   
Fair
 
   
Cost
   
Gains
   
Losses
   
Value
 
Government Sponsored enterprises
  $ 15,000       175       -       15,175  
                                 
Total held to maturity
  $ 15,000       175       -       15,175  

The following table distributes the debt securities included in the held to maturity portfolio as of December 31, 2007, based on the securities’ final maturity:

(dollars in thousands)
 
Amortized
   
Fair
 
   
Cost
   
Value
 
Due in one year through five years
  $ 15,000       15,175  


Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because of securities prepayments and the right of certain issuers to call or prepay their obligations without penalty.
There were no gross unrealized losses on held to maturity securities at December 31, 2007, and there were no sales of held to maturity securities during 2007.


(5) Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
A summary of loans by category is as follows:

             
(dollars in thousands)
 
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
 
Commercial
  $ 252,189       247,622  
Real estate - construtction
    37,842       25,534  
Real estate mortgage
    1,409,448       1,240,312  
Home equity lines of credit
    229,570       242,555  
Installment Loans
    5,865       6,491  
Total loans, net
    1,934,914       1,762,514  
Less: Allowance for loan Losses
    34,651       35,616  
Net loans
  $ 1,900,263       1,726,898  

At December 31, 2007 and 2006, loans to executive officers, directors, and to associates of such persons aggregated $4.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively. During 2007, approximately $2.4 million of new loans were made and repayments of loans totalled approximately $739 thousand. In the opinion of management, such loans were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions. These loans do not involve more than normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.
TrustCo lends primarily in the Capital District region of New York State and in the geographic territory surrounding its borders, and to a lesser extent, in Florida, Massachusetts and the mid-Hudson Valley region of New York. Although the loan portfolio is diversified, a portion of its debtors’ ability to repay depends significantly on the economic conditions prevailing in New York State.

 
 

 
 
The following table sets forth information with regard to nonperforming loans:

(dollars in thousands)
       
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Loans in nonaccrual status
  $ 12,065       5,713       1,662  
Loans conctractually past due 3 payments or more and still accruing interest
    19       211       35  
Restructured loans
    640       1,189       1,518  
Total nonperforming loans
  $ 12,724       7,113       3,215  

Interest on nonaccrual and restructured loans of $650 thousand in 2007, $380 thousand in 2006, and $250 thousand in 2005 would have been earned in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loans. Approximately $154 thousand, $149 thousand, and $201 thousand of interest on nonaccrual and restructured loans was collected and recognized as income in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. There are no commitments to extend further credit on nonaccrual or restructured loans.

Transactions in the allowance for loan losses account are summarized as follows:

(dollars in thousands)
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 35,616       45,377       49,384  
Adjustment upon adoption of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108
    -       (7,600 )     -  
Adjusted balance at beginning of year
    35,616       37,777       49,384  
Provision (credit) for loan losses
    2,500       (3,575 )     (6,260 )
Loans charged off
    (5,706 )     (2,117 )     (2,464 )
Recoveries on loans previously charged off
    2,241       3,531       4,717  
Balance at year end
  $ 34,651       35,616       45,377  

The Company identifies impaired loans and measures the impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan” (Statement 114), as amended. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the borrower will be unable to repay the loan according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement or the loan is restructured in a troubled debt restructuring. These standards are applicable principally to commercial and commercial real estate loans; however, certain provisions dealing with restructured loans also apply to retail loan products.
There were $2.1 million nonaccrual commercial and commercial real estate loans classified as impaired loans as of December 31, 2007 and none as of December 31, 2006. Retail loans totaling $640 thousand as of December 31, 2007, and $1.2 million as of December 31, 2006, were restructured after the effective date of Statement 114 and, accordingly, are identified as impaired loans. The Company specifically allocated $92 thousand and $39 thousand of the allowance for loan losses for these loans as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
During 2007, 2006, and 2005, the average balance of impaired loans was $1.3 million, $1.3 million, and $1.9 million, respectively, and there was approximately $154 thousand, $149 thousand, and $201 thousand of interest income recorded on these loans in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.

(6) Bank Premises and Equipment
A summary of premises and equipment at December 31, 2007 and 2006 follows:
             
             
(dollars in thousands)
 
2007
   
2006
 
Land
  $ 2,413       2,413  
Buildings
    25,162       24,372  
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
    30,659       27,395  
Leasehold improvements
    11,612       7,663  
Total bank premises and equipment
    69,846       61,843  
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (40,653 )     (37,793 )
Total
  $ 29,193       24,050  

Depreciation and amortization expense approximated $3.1 million, $2.7 million, and $2.7 million for the years 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Occupancy expense of the Bank’s premises included rental expense of $4.3 million in 2007, $3.1 million in 2006, and $2.4 million in 2005.

(7) Deposits

                   
Interest expense on deposits was a follows:
 
                   
(dollars in thousands)
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Interest bearing checking accounts
  $ 857       1,303       1,376  
Savings accounts
    8,979       10,800       6,769  
Time deposits and money market accounts
    79,425       55,125       35,481  
Total
  $ 89,261       67,228       43,626  

At December 31, 2007, the maturity of total time deposits is as follows:

(dollars in thousands)
     
Under 1 year
  $ 1,207,207  
1 to 2 years
    186,397  
2 to 3 years
    89,174  
3 to 4 years
    18,379  
4 to 5 years
    11,043  
Over 5 years
    1,354  
    $ 1,513,554  

(8) Short-Term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings of the Company were cash management accounts as follows:
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
2007
   
2006
 
             
Amount outstanding at December 31,
  $ 92,220       95,507  
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end
    101,762       95,538  
Average amount outstanding
    95,101       95,239  
Weighted average interest rate:For the year
    3.91 %     3.89  
As of year end
    3.25       4.15  

 
 

 
 
Cash management accounts represent retail deposits with customers for which the Bank has pledged certain assets as collateral.
Trustco also has an available line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank which approximates the balance of securities pledged against such borrowings.  The line of credit requires securities to be pledged as collateral for the amount borrowed.  As of December 31, 2007 and 2006 the Company had no outstanding borrowings, therefore no securities were pledged.

(9) Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006, of $29 thousand and $59 thousand consisted of a FHLB term loan with an interest rate of 5.22% maturing in 2008. This debt was assumed as part of an acquisition during 2000. The FHLB loan is collateralized by approximately $500 thousand in deposits at the FHLB.

(10) Income Taxes
A summary of income tax expense/(benefit) included in the Consolidated Statements of Income follows:

(dollars in thousands)
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Current tax expense:
                 
Federal
  $ 17,106       19,708       26,161  
State
    (252 )     602       1,810  
Total current tax expense
    16,854       20,310       27,971  
Deferred tax expense
    1,782       2,004       2,874  
Total income tax expense
  $ 18,636       22,314       30,845  

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2007 and 2006, are as follows:

             
       
   
December 31,
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
2007
   
2006
 
   
Deductible
   
Deductible
 
   
(taxable)
   
(taxable)
 
   
temporary
   
temporary
 
   
differences
   
differences
 
             
Benefits and deferred remuneration
  $ (626 )     (69 )
Deferred loan fees, net
    14       18  
Difference in reporting the allowance for loan losses, net
    17,453       17,400  
Other income or expense not yet reported for tax purposes
    1,543       1,624  
Depreciable assets
    1,006       2,083  
Other items
    733       849  
Net deferred tax asset at end of year
    20,123       21,905  
Net deferred tax asset at beginning of year
    21,905       30,213  
Implementation of new accounting standard (Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108)
    -       6,304  
Adjusted net deferred tax asset at beginning of year
    21,905       23,909  
Deferred tax expense
  $ 1,782       2,004  

Deferred tax assets are recognized subject to management’s judgment that realization is more likely than not. Based primarily on the sufficiency of historical and expected future taxable income, management believes it is more likely than not that the remaining deferred tax asset of $20.1 million and $21.9 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, will be realized.
In addition to the deferred tax items described in the preceding table, the Company has a deferred tax asset of $502 thousand and $6.8 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, relating to the net unrealized losses on securities available for sale and a deferred tax liability of $5.3 million and $4.8 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, as a result of the previously unrecognized overfunded position in the Company’s pension and post retirement benefit plans recorded, net of tax as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income.
The effective tax rates differ from the statutory federal income tax rate. The reasons for these differences are as follows:
 
                   
   
For the years ended
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Statutory federal income tax rate
    35.0 %     35.0       35.0  
Increase/(decrease) in taxes resulting from:
                       
Tax exempt income
    (3.0 )     (2.7 )     (2.3 )
State income tax, net of federal tax benefit
    0.2       0.8       1.7  
Other items
    (0.1 )     (0.1 )     (0.1 )
Effective income tax rate
    32.1 %     33.0       34.3  

 (11) Benefit Plans
(a) Retirement Plan
The Company maintains a trusteed non-contributory pension plan covering employees that have completed one year of employment and 1,000 hours of service. The benefits are based on the sum of (a) a benefit equal to a prior service benefit plus the average of the employees’ highest five consecutive years’ compensation in the ten years preceding retirement multiplied by a percentage of service after a specified date plus (b) a benefit based upon career average compensation. The amounts contributed to the plan are determined annually on the basis of (a) the maximum amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes or (b) the amount certified by a consulting actuary as necessary to avoid an accumulated funding deficiency as defined by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Contributions are intended to provide for benefits attributed to service to date. During 2006, the Company determined that the pension plan would be frozen as of December 31, 2006 and that no additional benefit to employees would be accrued. As a result of this action the Company recognized a net curtailment gain of $372 thousand during 2006. Assets of the plan are administered by Trustco Bank’s Trust Department. The following tables set forth the plan’s funded status as of a December 31 measurement date and amounts recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of condition at December 31, 2007 and 2006.

 
 

 
 
Benefit Plans
 
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
2007
   
2006
 
             
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
  $ 26,171       28,542  
Service cost
    44       732  
Interest cost
    1,406       1,478  
Benefits paid
    (1,611 )     (1,733 )
Net actuarial gain
    (713 )     (54 )
Total effect from curtailment
    -       (2,794 )
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
  $ 25,297       26,171  
                 

Change in Plan Assets and Reconciliation of Funded Status:
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
2007
   
2006
 
             
Fair Value of plan assets at beginning of year
  $ 30,774       28,998  
Actual gain on plan assets
    2,451       3,509  
Benefits paid
    (1,611 )     (1,733 )
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
    31,614       30,774  
                 
Funded status
    6,317       4,603  
Unrecognized net actuarial gain
    (3,063 )     (1,852 )
Net amount
  $ 3,254       2,751  

The accumulated benefit obligation for the plan was $25.3 million and $26.2 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Components of Net Periodic Pension Expense:
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Service cost
  $ 44       732       804  
Interest cost
    1,406       1,478       1,519  
Expected return on plan assets
    (1,954 )     (1,856 )     (1,850 )
Amortization of unrecognized Prior service cost
    -       65       106  
Curtailment gain, net
    -       (372 )     -  
Net periodic pension (benfit) expense
  $ (504 )     47       579  
 
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments, are expected to be paid:
(dollars in thousands)
 
Year
 
Pension Benefits
 
2008
  $ 1,556  
2009
    1,525  
2010
    1,518  
2011
    1,513  
2012
    1,525  
2013 - 2017
    7,711  

The assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31 are as follows:

             
   
2007
   
2006
 
Discount rate
    5.75 %     5.50  
 
The assumptions used to determine net periodic (income) expense for the years ended Decemeber 31 are as follows:
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Discount rate
    5.50 %     5.50       5.75  
Rate of increase in future compensation
 
N.A.
      4.00       4.50  
Expected long-term rate of return on assets
    6.50       6.50       6.50  

The Company also has a supplementary pension plan under which additional retirement benefits are accrued for eligible executive officers. The expense recorded for this plan was $440 thousand, $427 thousand, and $581 thousand, in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. This plan supplements the defined benefit retirement plan for eligible employees that are negatively affected by the Internal Revenue Service limit on the amount of pension payments that are allowed from a retirement plan. The supplemental plan provides eligible employees with total benefit payments as calculated by the retirement plan without regard to this limitation. Benefits under this plan are calculated using the same actuarial assumptions and interest rates as used for the retirement plan calculations. The accumulated benefits under this supplementary pension plan was approximately $5.1 million and $4.7 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Rabbi trusts have been established for certain benefit plans. These trust accounts are administered by the Company’s Trust Department and invest primarily in money market instruments. These assets are recorded at their fair value and are included as other short-term investments in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the trusts had assets totaling $7.1 million and $6.4 million, respectively.

(b) Postretirement Benefits
The Company permits retirees under age 65 to participate in the Company’s medical plan by making certain payments. At age 65, the Bank provides a Medicare Supplemental program to retirees.
In 2003, the Company amended the medical plan to reflect changes to the retiree medical insurance coverage portion. The Company’s subsidy of the retiree medical insurance premiums has been eliminated. The Company continues to provide postretirement medical benefits for a limited number of retired executives in accordance with their employment contracts.
The following tables show the plan’s funded status as of a December 31 measurement date and amounts recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition at December 31, 2007 and 2006.

Change in Accumulated Benefit Obligation:
(dollars in thousands)
 
2007
   
2006
 
Accumulated benefit obligation at beginning of year
  $ 1,031       1,272  
Service cost
    31       30  
Retiree contributions
    -       28  
Interest cost
    58       53  
Benefits paid
    (153 )     (109 )
Net Actuarial loss (gain)
    30       (243 )
                 
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year
  $ 997       1,031  


Change in Plan Assets and Reconciliation of Funded Status:
(dollars in thousands)
 
2007
   
2006
 
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
  $ 13,526       12,172  
Actual gain on plan assets
    1,011       1,435  
Retiree contributions
    -       28  
Benefits paid
    (153 )     (109 )
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
  $ 14,384       13,526  
                 
Funded status
  $ 13,387       12,495  
Unrecognized net actuarial gain
    (4,249 )     (3,867 )
Unrecognized prior service credit
    (5,973 )     (6,376 )
Net amount
  $ 3,165       2,252  

Components of Net Periodic Benefit
   
For the years ended
 
   
December 31,
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Service cost
  $ 31       30       35  
Interest cost
    58       53       65  
Expected return on plan assets
    (499 )     (402 )     (405 )
Amortization of net actuarial gain
    (134 )     (88 )     (75 )
Amortization of prior service credit
    (350 )     (403 )     (403 )
Net periodic benefit
  $ (894 )     (810 )     (783 )
 
Expected Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments are expected to be paid:
Year
 
Postretirement Benefits
 
       
2008
  $ 39  
2009
    42  
2010
    43  
2011
    45  
2012
    48  
2013 - 2017
    253  

The discount rate assumption used to determine benefit obligations at December 31 is as follows:

   
2007
   
2006
 
Discount rate
    5.75 %     5.50  

The assumptions used to determine net periodic pension benefit for the years ended December 31 are as follows:
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Discount rate
    5.50 %     5.50       5.75  
Expected long-term rate of return on assets, net of tax
    3.30       3.30       3.45  

For measurement purposes, a graded annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered benefits (i.e., health care cost trend rate) was assumed for 2007 and thereafter. Due to the plan amendment recognized in 2003 relating to the reimbursed portion of the retiree’s medical insurance premiums, a one percentage point increase or decrease in the assumed health care cost in each year would have a negligible impact on the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2007, and the interest and service components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
(c) Components of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to Retirement and Postretirement Benefit Plans.
The following table presents the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax related to SFAS No. 158 as of:

   
December 31, 2007
   
December 31, 2006
 
     
Retirement Plan
     
Postretirement Benefit Plan
   
Total
     
Retirement Plan
     
Postretirement Benefit Plan
   
Total
 
 
                                           
Unrecognized net actuarial gain
  $ 1,813       2,566       4,379       1,114       2,325       3,439  
                                                 
Unrecognized prior service cost
    -       3,607       3,607       -       3,833       3,833  
                                                 
Total
  $ 1,813       6,173       7,986       1,114       6,158       7,272  
 
The following table presents the components of other comprehensive income, net of tax during 2007:

     
Retirement Plan
     
Postretirement Benefit Plan
   
Total
 
                       
Increase in unrecognized net actuarial gain
  $ 699       306       1,005  
                         
Amortization of net actuarial gain and prior service cost
    -       (291 )     (291 )
                         
    $ 699       15       714  

 
 

 
 
(d) Major Categories of Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets:
The asset allocations of the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans at December 31, were as follows:

   
Pension Benefit
   
Postretirement Benefit
 
   
Plan Assets
   
Plan Assets
 
   
2007
   
2006
   
2007
   
2006
 
Debt Securities
    28.3 %     28.1       27.7       28.7  
Equity Securities
    69.0       69.8       68.1       67.4  
Other
    2.7       2.2       4.2       3.9  
Total
    100.0 %     100.0       100.0       100.0  

The expected long-term rate-of-return on plan assets, noted in sections (a) and (b) above, reflects long-term earnings expectations on existing plan assets. In estimating that rate, appropriate consideration was given to historical returns earned by plan assets and the rates of return expected to be available for reinvestment. Rates of return were adjusted to reflect current capital market assumptions and changes in investment allocations.
The Company’s investment policies and strategies for the pension benefit and postretirement benefit plans prescribe a target allocation of 60% to 70% equity securities and 30% to 40% debt securities for the asset categories. The Company’s investment goals are to maximize returns subject to specific risk management policies. Its risk management policies permit direct investments in equity and debt securities and mutual funds while prohibiting direct investment in derivative financial instruments. The Company addresses diversification by the use of mutual fund investments whose underlying investments are in domestic and international debt and equity securities. These mutual funds are readily marketable and can be sold to fund benefit payment obligations as they become payable.
The Company does not expect to make any contributions to its pension and postretirement benefit plans in 2008.
(e) Incentive and Bonus Plans
During 2006 the Company amended its profit sharing plan to include a 401(k) feature. Under the 401(k) feature the Company matches 100% of the aggregate salary contribution up to the first 3% of compensation and 50% of the aggregate contribution of the next 3%. No profit sharing contributions were made in 2007 or 2006 but were replaced with Company contributions to the 401k feature of the plan. Expenses related to the plan aggregated $309 thousand for 2007, $235 thousand in 2006 and $1.3 million in 2005.
The Company also has an executive incentive plan. The expense of this plan is based on the Company’s performance and estimated distributions to participants are accrued during the year and generally paid in the following year. The expense recorded for this plan was $1.4 million, $1.5 million and $2.0 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The Company has awarded 2.7 million performance bonus units to the executive officers and directors. These units become vested and exercisable only under a change of control as defined in the plan. The units were awarded based upon the stock price at the time of grant and, if exercised under a change of control, allow the holder to receive the increase in value offered in the exchange over the stock price at the date of grant for each unit.
(f) Stock Option Plans
Under the 2004 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, the Company may grant options to its eligible employees for up to approximately 2.0 million shares of common stock. Under the 1995 TrustCo Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan, the Company could have granted options to its eligible employees for up to approximately 7.9 million shares of common stock. Under the 2004 Directors Stock Option Plan, the Company could have granted options to its directors for up to approximately 200 thousand shares of its common stock. Under the 1993 Directors Stock Option Plan, the Company could have granted options to its directors for up to approximately 531 thousand shares of its common stock. The Company has approximately 599 thousand options available to be granted as of December 31, 2007.
Under each of these plans, the exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, and an option’s maximum term is ten years. Options vest over four years from the date the options are granted for the employees plans and they are immediately vested under the directors’ plans. A summary of the status of TrustCo’s stock option plans as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, and changes during the years then ended, are as follows:

 
 

 


   
Outstanding Options
   
Exercisable Options
 
         
Weighted
         
Weighted
 
         
Average
         
Average
 
         
Option
         
Option
 
   
Shares
   
Price
   
Shares
   
Price
 
Balance, January 1, 2005
    4,445,110     $ 10.00       3,708,022     $ 9.42  
New options awarded - 2005
    526,000       12.15       114,800       12.15  
Cancelled options - 2005
    (12,000 )     13.55       (12,000 )     13.55  
Exercised options - 2005
    (781,061 )     6.87       (781,061 )     6.87  
Options became exercisable
    -       -       1,148,288       12.65  
Balance, December 31, 2005
    4,178,049       10.85       4,178,049       10.85  
New options awarded - 2006
    -       -       -       -  
Cancelled options - 2006
    (26,250 )     12.86       (26,250 )     12.86  
Exercised options - 2006
    (95,133 )     6.14       (95,133 )     6.14  
Options became exercisable
    -       -       -       -  
Balance, December 31, 2006
    4,056,666       10.95       4,056,666       10.95  
New options awarded - 2007
    583,500       9.91       12,000       9.91  
Cancelled options - 2007
    -       -       -       -  
Exercised options - 2007
    (223,389 )     8.76       (223,389 )     8.76  
Options became exercisable
    -       -       -       -  
Balance, December 31, 2007
    4,416,777     $ 10.92       3,845,277     $ 11.07  

The following table summarizes information about total stock options outstanding at December 31, 2007:

       
Weighted
     
       
Average
 
Weighted
 
Range of
     
Remaining
 
Average
 
Exercise
 
Options
 
Contractual
 
Exercise
 
Price
 
Outstanding
 
Life
 
Price
 
Between $7.51 and $10.00
    1,915,026  
2.9 years
  $ 9.65  
Greater than $10.00
    2,501,751  
7.3 years
    11.90  
Total
    4,416,777  
5.4 years
  $ 10.92  

The following table summarizes information about total stock options exercisable at December 31, 2007:
 
       
Weighted
     
       
Average
 
Weighted
 
Range of
     
Remaining
 
Average
 
Exercise
 
Options
 
Contractual
 
Exercise
 
Price
 
Exercisable
 
Life
 
Price
 
Between $7.51and $10.00
    1,915,026  
2.9 years
  $ 9.65  
Greater than $10.00
    1,930,251  
6.5 years
    12.48  
Total
    3,845,277  
5.0 years
  $ 11.07  


As described in Note 1, the Company accelerated all unvested options in 2005, accordingly there are no unvested options as of December 31, 2006 and 2005. The decision to accelerate the vesting of these options was made primarily to reduce the non-cash compensation expense that would have been recorded in the Company’s consolidated income statement in periods subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 123R.

The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $511 thousand in 2007.  The amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options in 2007 was $2.0 million.  The tax benefit realized from stock options exercised in 2007 was $159 thousand.  It is the Company’s policy to generally issue stock for stock option exercises from previously unissued shares of common stock or treasury shares.

Stock-based Compensation Expense  Stock-based compensation expense totaled $77 thousand in 2007 related to the 2004 Trustco Bank Corp NY Stock Option Plan.  In addition, $9 thousand of stock-based compensation expense was recognized in 2007 related to the 2004 Directors Stock Option Plan.  Stock-based compensation expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period for all awards. There was no income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of income related to stock-based compensation in 2007.  Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options totaled $483 thousand at December 31, 2007.  At such date, the weighted-average period over which this unrecognized expense was expected to be recognized was 4.4 years.

Valuation of Stock-Based Compensation.   The fair value of the Company’s employee stock options granted is estimated on the measurement date, which, for the Company, is the date of grant.  The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during 2007 estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, was $0.96.  The Company estimated expected market price volatility and expected term of the options based on historical data and other factors. The assumptions used to determine the fair value of options granted during 2007 are detailed in the table below:

The following table summarizes information about total stock options exercisable at December 31, 2007:
 
   
Employees'
   
Directors'
 
   
Plan
   
Plan
 
             
Expected dividend yield:
    4.84 %     4.84  
Risk-free interest rate:
    4.92       4.91  
Expected volatility rate:
    18.71       15.22  
Expected lives:
 
7.5
years   6.0  
 
(12) Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
(a) Leases
The Bank leases certain banking premises. These leases are accounted for as operating leases with minimum rental commitments in the amounts presented below. The majority of these leases contain options to renew.

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
 
(dollars in thousands)
     
2008
  $ 4,211  
2009
    4,145  
2010
    4,117  
2011
    4,039  
2012
    3,793  
2013 and after
    36,818  
    $ 57,123  
 
(b) Litigation
Existing litigation arising in the normal course of business is not expected to result in any material loss to the Company.

 
 

 
 
(c) Outsourced Services
The Company contracted with third-party service providers to perform certain banking functions beginning 2002. The outsourced services include data and item processing for the Bank and trust operations. The service expense can vary based upon volume and nature of transactions processed. Outsourced service expense was $4.3 million in 2007, $4.2 million in 2006 and $4.1 million in 2005. The Company is contractually obligated to pay these third-party service providers approximately $4 million to $5 million per year through 2013.


(13) Earnings Per Share
A reconciliation of the component parts of earnings per share for 2007, 2006 and 2005 follows:

Earnings per Share
                 
(in thousands,
       
Weighted
       
except per share data)
       
Average Shares
   
Per Share
 
   
Income
   
Outstanding
   
Amounts
 
For the year ended December 31, 2007:
                 
Basic EPS:
                 
Income available to common shareholders
  $ 39,467       75,122     $ 0.525  
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
                       
Stock Options
            80       -  
Diluted EPS
  $ 39,467       75,202     $ 0.525  
For the year ended December 31, 2006:
                       
Basic EPS:
                       
Income available to common shareholders
  $ 45,325       74,904     $ 0.605  
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
                       
Stock Options
            245       (0.002 )
Diluted EPS
  $ 45,325       75,149     $ 0.603  
For the year ended December 31, 2005:
                       
Basic EPS:
                       
Income available to common shareholders
  $ 58,989       74,928     $ 0.787  
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
                       
Stock Options
            469       (0.005 )
Diluted EPS
  $ 58,989       75,397     $ 0.782  
 
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the number of antidulitive stock options excluded from diluted earnings per share was approximately 2.5 million and 1.9 million, respectively.

(14) Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
Loan commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require a fee. Commitments sometimes expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. These arrangements have credit risk essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers and are subject to the Bank’s normal credit policies, including obtaining collateral. The Bank’s maximum exposure to credit loss for loan commitments, including unused lines of credit, at December 31, 2007 and 2006, was $267.7 million and $297.6 million, respectively.  Approximately 83% and 80% of these commitments were for variable rate products at the end of 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The Company does not issue any guarantees that require liability-recognition or disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit. The Company has issued conditional commitments in the form of standby letters of credit to guarantee payment on behalf of a customer and guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally arise in connection with lending relationships. The credit risk involved in issuing these instruments is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Contingent obligations under standby letters of credit totaled approximately $4.0 million and $4.3 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and represent the maximum potential future payments the Company could be required to make. Typically, these instruments have terms of 12 months or less and expire unused; therefore, the total amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each customer is evaluated individually for creditworthiness under the same underwriting standards used for commitments to extend credit and on-balance sheet instruments. Company policies governing loan collateral apply to standby letters of credit at the time of credit extension. Loan-to-value ratios are generally consistent with loan-to-value requirements for other commercial loans secured by similar types of collateral. The fair value of the Company’s standby letters of credit at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was insignificant.
No losses are anticipated as a result of loan commitments or standby letters of credit.

 
 

 
 
(15) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair values shown below represent management’s estimates of values at which the various types of financial instruments could be exchanged in transactions between willing, unrelated parties. They do not necessarily represent amounts that would be received or paid in actual transactions.


Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
   
As of
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
December 31, 2007
 
   
Carrying
   
Fair
 
   
Value
   
Value
 
Financial assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 344,920       344,920  
Trading securities
    465,151       465,151  
Securities available for sale
    578,892       578,892  
Held to maturity securities
    15,000       15,175  
Loans
    1,900,263       1,923,698  
Accrued interest receivable
    17,481       17,481  
Financial liabilities:
               
Demand deposits
    262,863       262,863  
Interest bearing deposits
    2,757,435       2,760,018  
Short-term borrowings
    92,220       92,220  
Long-term debt
    29       29  
Accrued interest payable
    3,625       3,625  
                 
 
 
As of
(dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2006
   
Carrying
   
Fair
 
   
Value
   
Value
 
             
Financial assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 291,338       291,338  
Securities available for sale
    1,048,270       1,048,270  
Loans
    1,726,898       1,737,746  
Accrued interest receivable
    20,591       20,591  
Assets invested in trust account
    6,448       6,585  
Financial liabilities:
               
Demand deposits
    259,401       259,401  
Interest bearing deposits
    2,539,982       2,539,982  
Short-term borrowings
    95,507       95,507  
Long-term debt
    59       59  
Accrued interest payable
    3,029       3,029  

The specific estimation methods and assumptions used can have a substantial impact on the resulting fair values of financial instruments. Following is a brief summary of the significant methods and assumptions used in estimating fair values:
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate fair values.
Securities
Securities available for sale and trading account securities are fair valued utilizing an independent bond pricing service.  The pricing service uses a variety of techniques to arrive at fair value including market maker bids and quotes of significantly similar securities and pricing models.  Inputs to the pricing models include recent trades, benchmark interest rates, spreads and actual and projected cash flows.

Loans
The fair values of all loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses with discount rates equal to the interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.
Deposit Liabilities
The fair values disclosed for noninterest bearing deposits, interest bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, and money market accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date. The carrying value of all variable rate certificates of deposit approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed rate certificates of deposit is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses with discount rates equal to the interest rates currently being offered on certificates of similar size and remaining maturity.
Short-Term Borrowings, Long-Term Debt and Other Financial Instruments
The fair value of all short-term borrowings, long-term debt, and other financial instruments approximates the carrying value.
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. Such financial instruments consist of commitments to extend financing and standby letters of credit. If the commitments are exercised by the prospective borrowers, these financial instruments will become interest earning assets of the Company. If the commitments expire, the Company retains any fees paid by the prospective borrower. The fair value of commitments is estimated based upon fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into consideration the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the borrower. For fixed rate commitments, the fair value estimation takes into consideration an interest rate risk factor. The fair value of these off-balance sheet items approximates the recorded amounts of the related fees, which are considered to be immaterial.
The Company does not engage in activities involving interest rate swaps, forward placement contracts, or any other instruments commonly referred to as derivatives.

(16) Regulatory Capital Requirements
Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) capital regulations require banks to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital. Under the regulations in effect at December 31, 2007 and 2006, Trustco Bank was required to maintain a minimum tangible capital of 1.5% of adjusted total assets, a minimum leverage ratio of core capital to adjusted total assets of 4.00% and a minimum ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets of 8.00%.

 
 

 


Federal banking regulations also establish a framework for the classification of banks into five categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, under capitalized, significantly under capitalized, and critically under capitalized. Generally, an institution is considered well capitalized if it has a leverage capital ratio of at least 5.0% (based on total adjusted quarterly average assets), a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.0%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0%.
The foregoing capital ratios are based on specific quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulator about capital components, risk weighting and other factors.
Management believes that as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, Trustco Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject. Further, the most recent regulator notification categorized the Bank as a well-capitalized institution. There have been no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s capital classification.
Under its prompt corrective action regulations, the OTS is required to take certain supervisory actions (and may take additional discretionary actions) with respect to an undercapitalized institution. Such actions could have a direct material effect on an institution’s financial statements. As stated above, the Bank has been classified as well capitalized for regulatory purposes, and therefore, these regulations do not apply. The following is a summary of actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, for Trustco Bank:

Regulatory Capital Requirements
               
(dollars in thousands)
    As of December 31, 2007  
   
Amount
     
Ratio
 
Leverage capital:
  $ 212,845         6.33 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    212,845         12.33  
Total risk-based capital
    234,580         13.59  
 
(dollars in thousands)
      As of December 31, 2006  
   
Amount
     
Ratio
 
Leverage capital:
    228,114         7.25  
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    228,114         14.16  
Total risk-based capital
    248,446         15.42  


The following is a summary of actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 for TrustCo on a consolidated basis:

(dollars in thousands)
    As of December 31, 2007  
   
Amount
     
Ratio
 
Leverage capital:
  $ 228,995         6.80 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    228,995         13.53  
Total risk-based capital
    250,313         14.79  


(dollars in thousands)
    As of December 31, 2006  
   
Amount
     
Ratio
 
Leverage capital:
    241,898         7.67  
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    241,898         14.88  
Total risk-based capital
    262,409         16.14  

(17) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations (Revised 2007). (SFAS 141R)” SFAS 141R replaces SFAS 141, “Business Combinations,” and applies to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. SFAS 141R requires an acquirer, upon initially obtaining control of another entity, to recognize the assets, liabilities and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value as of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration is required to be recognized and measured at fair value on the date of acquisition rather than at a later date when the amount of that consideration may be determinable beyond a reasonable doubt. This fair value approach replaces the cost-allocation process required under SFAS 141 whereby the cost of an acquisition was allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value. SFAS 141R requires acquirers to expense acquisition-related costs as incurred rather than allocating such costs to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as was previously the case under SFAS 141. Under SFAS 141R, the requirements of SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” would have to be met in order to accrue for a restructuring plan in purchase accounting. Pre-acquisition contingencies are to be recognized at fair value, unless it is a non-contractual contingency that is not likely to materialize, in which case, nothing should be recognized in purchase accounting and, instead, that contingency would be subject to the probable and estimable recognition criteria of SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” SFAS 141R is expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s accounting for business combinations closing on or after January 1, 2009.

SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB Statement No. 51.” (SFAS 160) SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to establish accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among other requirements, SFAS 160 requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the non-controlling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest. SFAS 160 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, because the Company does not currently have a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary.


 
FSP No. 48-1 “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48.” FSP 48-1 provides guidance on how to determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. FSP 48-1 was effective retroactively to January 1, 2007 and did not significantly impact the Company’s financial statements.

SAB No. 109, “Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings.” (SAB No. 109) SAB No. 109 supersedes SAB 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments,” and indicates that the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in the measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. The guidance in SAB No. 109 is applied on a prospective basis to derivative loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. SAB 109 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


(18) Parent Company Only
The following statements pertain to TrustCo Bank Corp NY (Parent Company):

Parent Company Only


Statements of Income
 
   
(dollars in thousands)
    Years Ended December 31,  
Income:
 
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Dividends and interest from subsidiaries
  $ 46,209       49,144       37,733  
Net gain on sales or securities
    233       21       4,068  
Income from other investments
    261       219       131  
Total income
    46,703       49,384       41,932  
Expense:
                       
Operating supplies
    124       72       67  
Professional services
    182       66       276  
Miscellaneous expense
    296       163       277  
Total expense
    602       301       620  
Income before income taxes and subsidiaries' undistributed earnings
    46,101       49,083       41,312  
Income tax (benefit) expense
    (15 )     (14 )     1,485  
Income before (excess distributions by subsidiaries over earnings)/equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
    46,116       49,097       39,827  
(Excess distributions by subsidiaries over earnings)/equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
    (6,649 )     (3,772 )     19,162  
Net income
  $ 39,467       45,325       58,989  

Statements of Condition
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
December 31,
 
Assets:
 
2007
   
2006
 
Cash in subsidiary bank
  $ 20,180       14,133  
Investments in subsidiaries
    220,922       225,536  
Securities available for sale
    4,798       7,142  
Other assets
    33       -  
Total assets
    245,933       246,811  
Liabilities and shareholders' equity:
               
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    8,865       7,288  
Shareholders' equity
    237,068       239,523  
Total liabilities and shareholders'equity
  $ 245,933       246,811  


Statements of Cash Flows
 
                   
(dollars in thousands)
    Years Ended December 31,  
   
2007
   
2006
   
2005
 
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents:
                 
Cash flows from operating activities:
                 
Net income
  $ 39,467       45,325       58,989  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Excess distributions by subsidiaries over earnings/ (equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries)
    6,649       3,772       (19,162 )
Stock based compensation expense
    86       -       -  
Net gain on sales of securities
    (233 )     (21 )     (4,068 )
Net change in other assets and accrued expenses
    1,870       (163 )     (943 )
Total adjustments
    8,372       3,588       (24,173 )
Net cash provided by operating activities
    47,839       48,913       34,816  
Cash flows from investing activities:
                       
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale
    5,143       156       14,360  
Purchases of securities available for sale
    (3,390 )     (396 )     (12,166 )
Net cash provided by / (used in)investing activities
    1,753       (240 )     2,194  
Cash flows from financing activities:
                       
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and related tax benefits
    2,116       584       3,818  
Dividends paid
    (48,051 )     (47,890 )     (44,905 )
Payments to acquire treasury stock
    (5,908 )     (8,801 )     (14,846 )
Proceeds from sales of treasury stock
    8,298       8,964       10,996  
                         
Net cash used in financing activities
    (43,545 )     (47,143 )     (44,937 )
                         
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    6,047       1,530       (7,927 )
 
                       
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    14,133       12,603       20,530  
 
                       
                         
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 20,180       14,133       12,603  
                         
                         
Supplemental Information
                       
Increase in dividends payable
  $ 65       17       787  
Change in unrealized (loss)/gain on securities available for sale-
    (824 )     (40 )     4,139  
Change in deferred tax effect on unrealized loss/(gain) on securities available for sale
    329       16       (1,651 )
 
 
 

 
 
Section 5 (pages xx –xx)

Branch Locations
New York
       
         
Airmont Office
 
Bronxville Office
 
Delmar Office
327 Route 59 East
 
5-7 Park Place
 
167 Delaware Ave.
Airmont, NY
 
Bronxville, NY
 
Delmar, NY
Telephone: (845) 357-2435
 
Telephone: (914) 771-4180
 
Telephone: (518) 439-9941
         
Altamont Ave. Office
 
Central Ave. Office
 
East Greenbush Office
1400 Altamont Ave.
 
163 Central Ave.
 
501 Columbia Turnpike
Schenectady, NY
 
Albany, NY
 
Rensselaer, NY
Telephone: (518) 356-1317
 
Telephone: (518) 426-7291
 
Telephone: (518) 479-7233
         
Altamont Ave. West Office
 
Chatham Office
 
Elmsford Office
1900 Altamont Ave.
 
193 Hudson Avenue
 
100 Clearbrook Rd.
Rotterdam, NY
 
Chatham, NY
 
Elmsford, NY
Telephone: (518) 355-1900
 
Telephone: (518) 392-0031
 
Telephone: (914) 345-1808
         
Ardsley Office
 
Clifton Country Road Office
 
Exit 8/Crescent Rd. Office
33-35 Center Street
 
7 Clifton Country Rd.
 
CVS Plaza
Ardsley, NY
 
Clifton Park, NY
 
Clifton Park, NY
Telephone: (914) 693-3254
 
Telephone: (518) 371-5002
 
Telephone: (518) 383-0039
         
Ballston Spa Office
 
Clifton Park Office
 
Fishkill Office
235 Church Ave.
 
1018 Route 146
 
1542 Route 52
Ballston Spa, NY
 
Clifton Park, NY
 
Fishkill, NY
Telephone: (518) 885-1561
 
Telephone: (518) 371-8451
 
Telephone: (845) 896-8260
         
Bedford Hills Office
 
Cobleskill Office
 
Freemans Bridge Rd. Office
180 Harris Rd.
 
RR #3, Rt. 7
 
Trustco Center
Bedford Hills, NY
 
Cobleskill, NY
 
Glenville, NY
Telephone: (914) 666-6230
 
Telephone: (518) 254-0290
 
Telephone: (518) 344-7510
         
Brandywine Office
 
Colonie Office
 
Glens Falls Office
State St. at Brandywine Ave.
 
1892 Central Ave.
 
3 Warren Street
Schenectady, NY
 
Colonie Plaza, Colonie, NY
 
Glens Falls, NY
Telephone: (518) 346-4295
 
Telephone: (518) 456-0041
 
Telephone: (518) 798-8131
         
Briarcliff Manor Office
 
Crestwood Plaza Office
 
Greenwich Office
64 Route 100
 
415 Whitehall Road
 
131 Main St.
Briarcliff Manor, NY
 
Albany, NY
 
Greenwich, NY
Telephone: (914) 762-7133
 
Telephone: (518) 482-0693
 
Telephone: (518) 692-2233

 
 

 
 
Guilderland Office
 
Malta Mall Office
 
New Scotland Office
3900 Carman Rd.
 
43 Round Lake Rd.
 
301 New Scotland Ave.
Schenectady, NY
 
Ballston Lake, NY
 
Albany, NY
Telephone: (518) 355-4890
 
Telephone: (518) 899-1558
 
Telephone: (518) 438-7838
         
Halfmoon Office
 
Mamaroneck Office
 
Newton Plaza Office
Country Dollar Plaza
 
190 Boston Post Road
 
602 New Loudon Rd.
Halfmoon, NY
 
Mamaroneck, NY
 
Latham, NY
Telephone: (518) 371-0593
 
Telephone: (914) 777-3023
 
Telephone: (518) 786-3687
         
Highland Office
 
Mayfair Office
 
Niskayuna-Woodlawn Office
3580 Route 9W
 
286 Saratoga Rd.
 
3461 State St.
Highland, NY
 
Glenville, NY
 
Schenectady, NY
Telephone: (845) 691-7023
 
Telephone: (518) 399-9121
 
Telephone: (518) 377-2264
         
Hoosick Falls Office
 
Mechanicville Office
 
Northern Pines Road Office
47 Main St.
 
9 Price Chopper Plaza
 
649 Route 9
Hoosick Falls, NY
 
Mechanicville, NY
 
Gansevoort, NY
Telephone: (518) 686-5352
 
Telephone: (518) 664-1059
 
Telephone: (518) 583-2634
         
Hudson Office
 
Milton Office
 
Peekskill Office
507 Warren St.
 
2 Trieble Ave.
 
20 Welcher Ave.
Hudson, NY
 
Ballston Spa, NY
 
Peekskill, NY
Telephone: (518) 828-9434
 
Telephone: (518) 885-0498
 
Telephone: (914) 739-1853
         
Hudson Falls Office
 
Monroe Office
 
Pomona Office
3376 Burgoyne Ave.
 
791 Rt. 17M
 
1581 Route 202
Hudson Falls, NY
 
Monroe, NY
 
Pomona, NY
Telephone: (518) 747-0886
 
Telephone: (845) 782-1100
 
Telephone: (845) 354-0176
         
Latham Office
 
Mont Pleasant Office
 
Poughkeepsie Office
1 Johnson Rd.
 
Crane St. at Main Ave.
 
2656 South Rd.
Latham, NY
 
Schenectady, NY
 
(Route 9)
Telephone: (518) 785-0761
 
Telephone: (518) 346-1267
 
Poughkeepsie, NY
       
Telephone: (845) 485-6419
Loudon Plaza Office
 
Mt. Kisco Office
   
372 Northern Blvd.
 
222 East Main St.
 
Queensbury Office
Albany, NY
 
Mt. Kisco, NY
 
118 Quaker Rd.
Telephone: (518) 462-6668
 
Telephone: (914) 666-2362
 
Suite 9, Queensbury, NY
       
Telephone: (518) 798-7226
Madison Ave. Office
 
New City Office
   
1084 Madison Ave.
 
20 Squadron Blvd.
 
Rotterdam Office
Albany, NY
 
New City, NY
 
Curry Road Shopping Ctr.
Telephone: (518) 489-4711
 
Telephone: (845) 634-4571
 
Rotterdam, NY
       
Telephone: (518) 355-8330
Malta 4 Corners Office
       
2471 Route 9
       
Malta, NY
       
Telephone: (518) 899-1056
       

 
 

 
 
Rotterdam Square Office
 
South Glens Falls Office
 
Union Street East Office
93 W. Campbell Rd.
 
Glengate Shopping Plaza
 
1700 Union St.
Rotterdam, NY
 
133 Saratoga Road, Suite 1
 
Schenectady, NY
Telephone: (518) 377-2393
 
South Glens Falls, NY
 
Telephone: (518) 382-7511
   
Telephone: (518) 793-7668
   
Route 2 Office — Latham
     
Upper Union Street Office
201 Troy-Schenectady Rd.
 
State Farm Rd. Office
 
1620 Union St.
Latham, NY
 
2050 Western Ave.
 
Schenectady, NY
Telephone: (518) 785-7155
 
Guilderland, NY
 
Telephone: (518) 374-4056
   
Telephone: (518) 452-6913
   
Route 7 Office
     
Ushers Road Office
1156 Troy-Schenectady Rd.
 
State St. Albany Office
 
308 Ushers Rd.
Latham, NY
 
112 State St.
 
Ballston Lake, NY
Telephone: (518) 785-4744
 
Albany, NY
 
Telephone: (518) 877-8069
   
Telephone: (518) 436-9043
   
Saratoga Office
     
Valatie Office
34 Congress St.
 
State St. Schenectady Office
 
2929 Route 9
Saratoga Springs, NY
 
320 State St.
 
Valatie, NY
Telephone: (518) 587-3500
 
Schenectady, NY
 
Telephone: (518) 758-2265
   
Telephone: (518) 377-3311
   
Schaghticoke Office
     
Wappingers Falls Office
2 Main St.
 
Stuyvesant Plaza Office
 
1490 Route 9
Schaghticoke, NY
 
Western Ave. at Fuller Rd.
 
Wappingers Falls, NY
Telephone: (518) 753-6509
 
Albany, N
 
Telephone: (845) 298-9315
   
Telephone: (518) 489-2616
   
Scotia Office
     
West Sand Lake Office
123 Mohawk Ave.
 
Tanners Main Office
 
3707 NY Rt. 43
Scotia, NY
 
345 Main St.
 
West Sand Lake, NY
Telephone: (518) 372-9416
 
Catskill, NY
 
Telephone: (518) 674-3327
   
Telephone: (518) 943-2500
   
Sheridan Plaza Office
     
Wilton Mall Office
1350 Gerling St.
 
Tanners West Side Office
 
Route 50
Schenectady, NY
 
238 West Bridge St.
 
Saratoga Springs, NY
Telephone: (518) 377-8517
 
Catskill, NY
 
Telephone: (518) 583-1716
   
Telephone: (518) 943-5090
   
Slingerlands Office
     
Wolf Road Office
1569 New Scotland Avenue
 
Troy Office
 
34 Wolf Rd.
Slingerlands, NY
 
5th Ave. and State St.
 
Albany, NY
Telephone: (518) 439-9352
 
Troy, NY
 
Telephone: (518) 458-7761
   
Telephone: (518) 274-5420
   
       
Wynantskill Office
       
134-136 Main St., Rt. 66
       
Wynantskill, NY
       
Telephone: (518) 286-2674

 
 

 
 
Florida
       
         
Apollo Beach Office
 
Lake Mary Office
 
Rinehart Road Office
6434 Apollo Beach Blvd.
 
350 West Lake Mary Blvd.
 
1185 Rinehart Road
Apollo Beach, FL
 
Sanford, FL
 
Sanford, FL
Telephone: (813) 649-0460
 
Telephone: (407) 330-7106
 
Telephone: (407) 268-3720
         
Apopka Office
 
Lake Square Office
 
Sarasota Office
1134 N. Rock Springs Rd.
 
10105 Route 441
 
2704 Bee Ridge Road
Apopka, FL
 
Leesburg, FL
 
Sarasota, FL
Telephone: (407) 464-7373
 
Telephone: (352) 323-8147
 
Telephone: (941) 929-9451
         
Clermont Office
 
Lee Road Office
 
South Clermont Office
12305 US Route 27 Unit 108
 
1084 Lee Rd., Suite 11
 
16908 High Grove Blvd.
Clermont, FL
 
Orlando, FL
 
Clermont, FL
Telephone: (352) 243-2563
 
Telephone: (407) 532-4211
 
Telephone: (352) 243-9511
         
Colonial Drive Office
 
Leesburg Office
 
Tuskawilla Road Office
4450 East Colonial Dr.
 
1330 Citizens Blvd., Suite 101
 
1295 Tuskawilla Road
Orlando, FL
 
Leesburg, FL
 
Winter Springs, FL
Telephone: (407) 895-6393
 
Telephone: (352) 365-1305
 
Telephone: (407) 695-5558
         
Curry Ford Road Office
 
Maitland Office
 
Winter Haven Office
Shoppes at Andover, Suite 116
 
9400 US Rt. 17/92, Suite 1008
 
7460 Cypress Gardens Blvd.
3020 Lamberton Boulevard
 
Maitland, FL
 
Winter Haven, FL
Orlando, FL
 
Telephone: (407) 332-6071
 
Telephone: (863) 326-1918
Telephone: (407) 277-9663
       
   
Orange City Office
 
Villaggio Office
Curry Ford West Office
 
902 Saxon Blvd.
 
851 SR 434
2826 Curry Ford Road
 
Orange City, FL
 
Winter Springs, FL
Orlando, FL
 
Telephone: (386) 775-1392
 
Telephone: (407) 327-6064
Telephone: (407) 894-8391
       
   
Osprey Office
 
Massachusetts
Dean Road Office
 
1300 South Tamiami Trail
 
Allendale Office
3920 Dean Rd.
 
Osprey, FL
 
5 Cheshire Rd., Suite 12
Orlando, FL
 
Telephone: (941) 918-9380
 
Pittsfield, MA
Telephone: (407) 657-8001
     
Telephone: (413) 236-8400
   
Oviedo Office
   
East Colonial Office
 
1875 West County Road 419
 
Great Barrington Office
12901 East Colonial Drive
 
Suite 600
 
320 Stockbridge Rd.
Orlando, FL
 
Oviedo, FL
 
Great Barrington, MA
Telephone: (407) 275-3075
 
Telephone: (407) 365-1145
 
Telephone: (413) 644-0054
         
Goldenrod Road Office
       
7803 E. Colonial Rd., Suite 107
       
Orlando, FL
       
Telephone: (407) 207-3773
       

 
 

 
 
Lee Office
 
Pittsfield Office
 
Vermont
43 Park St.
 
1 Dan Fox Drive
 
Bennington Office
Lee, MA
 
Pittsfield, MA
 
215 North St.
Telephone: (413) 243-4300
 
Telephone: (413) 442-1330
 
Bennington, VT
       
Telephone: (802) 447-4952
   
New Jersey
   
   
Ramsey Office
   
   
385 N. Franklin Turnpike
   
   
Ramsey, NJ
   
   
Telephone: (201) 934-1429
   

 
 

 
 
TrustCo Bank Corp NY Officers and Board of Directors

Officers

PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Robert J. McCormick

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Robert T. Cushing

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF BANKING OFFICER
Scot R. Salvador

Secretary
Thomas M. Poitras

ASSISTANT SECRETARIES
Robert M. Leonard
Sharon J. Parvis

Board of Directors
Joseph Lucarelli
President
Traditional Builders
Residential Construction
Thomas O. Maggs
President
Maggs & Associates
Insurance Agency
Anthony J. Marinello, M.D., Ph.D.
Physician
Robert A. McCormick
Chairman
TrustCo Bank Corp NY
Robert J. McCormick
President and Chief Executive Officer
TrustCo Bank Corp NY
William D. Powers
Partner
Powers & Co., LLC
Consulting
William J. Purdy
President
Welbourne & Purdy Realty, Inc.
Real Estate

Directors of TrustCo Bank Corp NY
are also Directors of Trustco Bank

 
 

 
 
HONORARY DIRECTORS

Lionel O. Barthold
M. Norman Brickman
Bernard J. King
Nancy A. McNamara
William H. Milton, III
John S. Morris, Ph.D.
James H. Murphy, D.D.S.
Richard J. Murray, Jr.
Daniel J. Rourke, M.D.
Anthony M. Salerno
Edwin O. Salisbury
William F. Terry

Trustco Bank Officers

PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Robert J. McCormick

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
Robert T. Cushing

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF BANKING OFFICER
Scot R. Salvador

AUDITOR
Kenneth E. Hughes, Jr.

ACCOUNTING/FINANCE
Vice Presidents
Michael M. Ozimek
Daniel R. Saullo
Kevin T. Timmons

BRANCH ADMINISTRATION
Administrative Vice Presidents
Eric W. Schreck
Vice Presidents
Patrick M. Canavan
John R. George
Assistant Vice Presidents
Amy E. Anderson
Clint Mallard
Officers
Takla A. Awad
Mary Jean Riley

COMPLIANCE
Vice President
Thomas M. Poitras

 
 

 

COMMERCIAL LENDING
Vice President
Sharon J. Parvis
Assistant Vice President
Paul R. Steenburgh
Officers
Daniel Centi
Bradley T. Delarm
James M. Poole

FACILITIES
Vice President
George W. Wickswat

MORTGAGE LOANS
Vice President
Michael J. Lofrumento

MORTGAGE ORIGINATORS
Administrative Vice President
Deborah K. Appel

OPERATIONS
Administrative Vice President
Kevin M. Curley
Officer
Michael V. Pitnell

PERSONNEL/QUALITY
CONTROL/COMMUNITY RELATIONS
Vice President
Robert M. Leonard
Officer
Paul D. Matthews

TRUST DEPARTMENT
Vice President
Patrick J. LaPorta, Esq.
Officers
Michael J. Ewell
Jesse C. Koepp
Richard W. Provost

 
 

 

General Information


Monday, May 19, 2008
10:00 AM
Mallozzi’s Restaurant
1930 Curry Road
Schenectady, NY 12303

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
5 Sarnowski Drive
Glenville, NY 12302
(518) 377-3311

DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
A Dividend Reinvestment Plan is available to shareholders of TrustCo Bank Corp NY. It provides for the reinvestment of cash dividends and optional cash payments to purchase additional shares of TrustCo stock. The Plan has certain administrative charges and provides a convenient method of acquiring additional shares. American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (“AST”) acts as administrator for this service and is the agent for shareholders in these transactions. Shareholders who want additional information may contact AST at 866-659-2647.

DIRECT DEPOSIT OF DIVIDENDS
Electronic deposit of dividends, which offers safety and convenience, is available to TrustCo shareholders who wish to have dividends deposited directly to personal checking, savings or other accounts. Electing direct deposit will not affect the mailing of annual and quarterly reports and proxy materials. If you would like to arrange direct deposit, please write to American Stock and Transfer & Trust Company listed as transfer agent at the bottem of this page.

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AT TRUSTCO
Trustco Bank is an Affirmative Action Equal Opportunity Employer.

FORM 10-K
TrustCo Bank Corp NY will provide, without charge, a copy of its Form 10-K upon written request. Requests and related inquiries should be directed to Kevin Timmons, Vice President, Treasurer, TrustCo Bank Corp NY, P.O. Box 380, Schenectady, New York 12301-0380.

CODE OF CONDUCT
TrustCo Bank Corp NY will provide, without charge, a copy of its Code of Conduct upon written request. Requests and related inquiries should be directed to Robert M. Leonard, Administrative Vice President-Personnel, TrustCo Bank Corp NY, P.O. Box 1082, Schenectady, New York 12301-1082.

NASDAQ SYMBOL: TRST
The Corporation’s common stock trades on The Nasdaq Stock MarketSM under the symbol TRST. There are approximately 15 thousand shareholders of record of TrustCo common stock.

SUBSIDIARIES:
Trustco Bank     ORE Subsidiary Corp.
Glenville, New York     Glenville, New York
Member FDIC
(and its wholly owned subsidiary,
Trustco Vermont Investment Company
Bennington, Vermont)

 
 

 
 
TRANSFER AGENT
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
P.O. Box 922
New York, NY 10269
(866) 659-2647

Trustco Bank® is a registered service mark with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.


Share Price Information
The following graph shows changes over a five-year period in the value of $100 invested in: (1) TrustCo’s common stock; (2) Russell 2000 and (3) an industry group of seventeen other regional bank holding companies compiled by SNL Financial LC, called the Superregional Bank Index. The fifteen-year period is presented in addition to the five-year period required by the S.E.C. because it provides additional perspective, and TrustCo management believes that longer-term performance is of greater interest to TrustCo shareholders. The fifteen-year graph uses the value of $100 invested in (1) TrustCo’s common stock, (2) Russell 2000, and (3) an industry group of seventeen other regional bank holding companies compiled by SNL Financial LC, called the Superregional Bank Index. The banks comprising the Superregional Bank Index are: BB&T Corp., Comerica Inc., Fifth Third Bancorp, First Horizon National Corp., Huntington Bancshares Inc., KeyCorp, M&T Bank Corp., Marshall & Ilsley Corporation, National City Corp., PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Popular Inc., Regions Financial Corp., SunTrust Banks, Inc., U.S. Bancorp, Wachovia Corp., Wells Fargo & Co., and Zions Bancorp.
 
 
 
Trustco Bank Corp NY
 
 
Graph

   
Period Ending
 
Index
 
12/31/02
   
12/31/03
   
12/31/04
   
12/31/05
   
12/31/06
   
12/31/07
 
TrustCo Bank Corp NY
    100.00       128.31       140.72       132.99       125.93       119.55  
Russell 2000
    100.00       147.25       174.24       182.18       215.64       212.26  
SNL Bank Superregional Index
    100.00       128.41       142.33       143.27       164.98       125.46  
 

 
 
Trustco Bank Corp NY
 
 
Graph
 

   
Period Ending
 
Index
 
1992
   
1993
   
1994
   
1995
   
1996
   
1997
   
1998
   
1999
   
2000
   
2001
   
2002
   
2003
   
2004
   
2005
   
2006
   
2007
 
TrustCo Bank Corp NY
    100.00       140.53       144.71       199.91       233.39       358.66       472.28       434.11       482.41       600.99       540.69       693.78       760.84       719.05       680.91       646.37  
Russell 2000
    100.00       118.88       116.71       149.92       174.64       213.70       208.26       252.53       244.90       250.99       199.58       293.88       347.75       363.59       430.37       423.63  
SNL Superregional Bank Index
    100.00       104.62       98.96       154.37       213.95       310.49       334.76       273.23       341.21       331.40       341.70       438.76       486.34       489.53       563.73       428.69  
 

 

 
EX-21 3 ex21.htm EXHIBIT 21 ex21.htm

Exhibit 21
 
SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUSTCO BANK CORP NY
 
 
Trustco Bank
Federally chartered savings bank
   
ORE Subsidiary Corp.
New York corporation
   
Trustco Vermont Investment Company
Vermont corporation
(Subsidiary of Trustco Bank)
 
   
Trustco Realty Corp.
New York corporation
(Subsidiary of Trustco Vermont
 
Investment Company)
 
 
Each subsidiary does business under its own name. The activities of each are described in Part I, Item 1 of Form 10-K.
 
 

EX-23 4 ex23.htm EXHIBIT 23 ex23.htm

Exhibit 23
 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
The Board of Directors
 
TrustCo Bank Corp NY:
 
We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements Form S-8 (No. 33-60409), Form S-8 (No. 333-78811), Form S-8 (No. 333-115689), Form S-8 (No. 333-115674), Form S-3 (No. 333-99687) and Form S-3 (No. 333-146926) of TrustCo Bank Corp NY and subsidiaries (the Company) of our reports dated February 26, 2008, with respect to the consolidated statements of condition of TrustCo Bank Corp NY and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K of TrustCo Bank Corp NY.
 
Our report with respect to the consolidated statements of condition of TrustCo Bank Corp NY and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, refers to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” as of January 1, 2007, SFAS No. 158 “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” as of December 31, 2006, and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” as of January 1, 2006.
 
/s/ KPMG LLP
 
Albany, New York
 
February 28, 2008
 
 

EX-24 5 ex24.htm EXHIBIT 24 ex24.htm

Exhibit 24
 
POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
The undersigned persons do hereby appoint Thomas Poitras or Robert T. Cushing as a true and lawful Attorney In Fact for the sole purpose of affixing their signatures to the 2007 Annual Report (Form 10-K) of TrustCo Bank Corp NY to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
 
/s/ Joseph Lucarelli
 
/s/ Robert J. McCormick
Joseph Lucarelli
 
Robert J. McCormick
     
/s/ Thomas O. Maggs
 
/s/ William D. Powers
Thomas O. Maggs
 
William D. Powers
     
/s/ Anthony J. Marinello
 
/s/ William J. Purdy
Dr. Anthony J. Marinello
 
William J. Purdy
     
/s/ Robert A. McCormick
   
Robert A. McCormick
   

 
Sworn to before me this 19th day of February 2008.
 
/s/Joan Clark
 
Notary Public
 
 
Joan Clark
Notary Public, State of New York
Qualified in Albany County
No. 01CL4822282
Commission Expires November 30, 2010
 
 

EX-31.IA 6 ex31_ia.htm EXHIBIT 31(I)(A) ex31_ia.htm

Exhibit 31(i)(a)
 
Certification
 
I, Robert J. McCormick, principal executive officer of TrustCo Bank Corp NY (“registrant”), certify that:
 
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of TrustCo Bank Corp NY;
 
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statement for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date: February 28, 2008
 
/s/ Robert J. McCormick
 
Robert J. McCormick
President and Chief Executive Officer
 


EX-31.IB 7 ex31_ib.htm EXHIBIT 31(I)(B) ex31_ib.htm

Exhibit 31(i)(b)
 
Certification
 
I, Robert T. Cushing, principal financial officer of TrustCo Bank Corp NY (“registrant”), certify that:
 
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of TrustCo Bank Corp NY;
 
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I, are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date: February 28, 2008
 
/s/ Robert T. Cushing
 
Robert T. Cushing
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
 
 

EX-32 8 ex32.htm EXHIBIT 32 ex32.htm

Exhibit 32
 
Section 1350 Certifications
 
In connection with the Annual Report of TrustCo Bank Corp NY (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :
 
1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
  /s/ Robert J. McCormick
 
Robert J. McCormick
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
   
  /s/ Robert T. Cushing
 
Robert T. Cushing
 
Executive Vice President and
 
Chief Financial Officer
February 28, 2008
 
 

GRAPHIC 9 graph.jpg GRAPH begin 644 graph.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_VP!#``8$!08%!`8&!08'!P8("A`*"@D) M"A0.#PP0%Q08&!<4%A8:'24?&ALC'!86("P@(R8G*2HI&1\M,"TH,"4H*2C_ MVP!#`0<'!PH("A,*"A,H&A8:*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H M*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"C_P``1"`&S`JP#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M&@`!`0$!`0$!``````````````8%!P,$"/_$`%00```%`P$#"`D"`P4%!`@& M`P`!`@,$!081$A,65@<4(2)4E=/4%17O'8GQIS[ M=,%4`E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\"7)\^G M>:%4`"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ_`ER?/IWFA5``E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\"7)\^G>:%4`"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ_`ER?/ MIWFA5``E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\"7)\ M^G>:%4`"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ_`ER?/IWFA5``E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\"7)\^G>:%4`"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ_`ER M?/IWFA5``E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\"7 M)\^G>:%4`"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ_`ER?/IWFA5``E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\"7)\^G>:%4`"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ_` MER?/IWFA5``E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\ M"7)\^G>:%4`"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ_`ER?/IWFA5``E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\"7)\^G>:%4`"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ M_`ER?/IWFA5``E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>B MK\"7)\^G>:%4`"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ_`ER?/IWFA5``E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\"7)\^G>:%4`"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@W MHJ_`ER?/IWFA5``E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:# M>BK\"7)\^G>:%4`"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ_`ER?/IWFA5``E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\"7)\^G>:%4`"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF M@WHJ_`ER?/IWFA5``E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G> M:#>BK\"7)\^G>:%4`"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ_`ER?/IWFA5``E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\"7)\^G>:%4`"0D7G*AJC*J= MH7!!C/RF(G.'7(2D-K>=2T@U$B0I6-2TYPDQ7B5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H!*WE[Q MV)\:<^W3!5"5O+WCL3XTY]NF"J`````````````````````````````````` M`````````````!*WUR@VQ8G,=ZZGS#GNOF_^SNNZ]&G5^Q*L8UI]N/:,JUN6 M*Q+JKL6C4&N\[J4G5LF>9OMZM*36KK*01%U4F?2?\A?CB'(G57Z#_958J\-# M2Y-/I]1EM)=(S0I;;KZB)1$9'C)%G!D`[>,^DUFG5=RH(IDMJ4JGRE0I)MGD MFWDI2I2,^PS(EISC.#R1])&1?G6AU*MV\WR976B_YUWU\ZS^JQ^ML^ MKF2Y_#VNI.->+<=11,D*(C-#;IX26P,TJ42FO:1D>HSPG'6O_P`+'_\`AG__``@/ M:)R]\F"U+4V24E_4S,B+VF8Z>/RA7JA?4;D9 MMJGW2FWXU@5.GQ(KM5@0'9LB`R;;9M+>;6LDY/JD:DD>D\FG"]!'0-"#6O!%_(DI,S,^@LD6"(^@BR(2@DS(BR9D0\JM4)57_LVS:E4'=M-F6DN0^YI).MQ<,U*/!$1%DS M/H(L#G5'L6^N43DVLZB7'*M:)9G-8<@G(33JZAL4LEH21N)-"'#(R(U)QC)_ MN3E*@_1X#\R\JES7I4^52Y:5;C\YMNVHK,F.4*MQZ*^>5.@TM^Z:E0HDNS(]3GM4.61(6Z;_3L5DI24]8T_J) MU&:$Z/RA;OI'D^L#E8NFBUVKOU&FUV52F6YTC;,*-3\=!REH,B)4C"CZY]!_ MS299(6MKJJ-D=E(J,GG)MFTTIQN0P>HS0VX>2(NDC)* MLJ69$:0[T`_)<)RYFO[,<^^I-[7)(JCS)1H[?/%(1';]((2:LD>I3IZ5EM#5 MG0O1C!$+!-LW(?*\Y9CW*+=*H,VA)K-0?0\A#JWBD*1IC'I_V9LU&2M*,]4M M!Y+!D'Z$`?EMFY*W7^27DR1)N.Z7:W4USFFX5$-+4NI+:4M#9N2C,B:;;(DZ MU*)>24:C(S2:B^2GUZ\G^3RETY=P5>FUAGE#10TR'Y)2GV&S09[-U9:2D$E: MC,R5U58(L$G!$'ZO`<`YS6.36_[IIL*XZW784>S'Z\VW7I1RL26G5)3@\)-* M<$>2299STGT)QH`_*')K>E_5ROT.[%.NG!JE633YO.:]&*GZ%KP;+$)6EQMY M*"0I/74M6DSPHG#S^KP````````````````````````````````````````` M``````2O*7[N0_C5)^XQQ5"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H!*WE[QV)\:<^W3!5"5O+W MCL3XTY]NF"J``````$_3[QH4[G)M3MFTPRJ4;\EER.RXPG&IYIQQ*4NM%E)F MX@U)(E)/.%)R%``GV+PHSM*J=04_)CQZ8R M%$DR,T*(LFDR+0HE7C5F*N1#;G-MI6;9E,A/1%Y(B/H0ZA*C+I+I(L>TL]!@ M-`````````````````````````````````````!E6M;U+M6A1:-08O-*;&U; M)G:*'4K6I+>L^ML MT&HTM_S+JD6",R+!&9!*Y++*E56MU%^WXRI=:95'GGK627DJ4E1GH)6E*M2$ MJUI(E:BU9SDQ:@`@*1R.V)1V7FJ90N;)?9?C/&W,?)3S3R"0XVM6O*DF22,D MF9DD^LG"ND56[U+W5W;YK_N7F7H_F^T5_`T;/1JSJ_;T9SG_`#R-4`&+)M6B M2K1*UY5/:>H28J(91'#4HB:01$@M1GJR6DC)6=1&1'G)9&)6.2VSJU;=+H55 MH_.Z;2\E"2[*>4XPDRQI2[KVFG&"TZL82DL=5.+4`$K=O)Y:EVTJGTVO42-( MA4_!1&VS4QL$Z=.E!MFDTIP1=4CQU4]'06,JKNS:S4+;C/5"9K-]>U M<2E:EI-*E:"4224>3/419U=;.KI%^`"?I-G4*D56'4J?!V,V'3$49AS;.*T1 M$*)26\&HR/!D76,M7^81K.H4:E5ZFL0=,*NO2)%1;VSA[=Q].ET\FK*=1?R2 M9$7\L"@`!E;O4O=7=OFO^Y>9>C^;[17\#1L]&K.K]O1G.?\`/(^NDT^+2*5# MIM/:V,*&RB.PWJ-6AM"22DLF9F>"(NDSR/J`!*W;R>6I=U5I]2N2B1I\V#@F M7'#475)6HDK(C(G$Y_PK(RZ5='6/.KN]2]ZMY.:_[ZYEZ/YQM%?P->TT:F3VG34ZB0ZZ1$X:B69EA1$1&DNK_ M`)#*L?DUM&QI4F5:]&:A29*";<=-UQU9H(\Z2-Q2C21G@S(L9P6`"5] M7UL;B;F^C/\`U;['SAW_`.+M?WZM?[^G]W^7LZ!J[O4O>K>3FO\`OKF7H_G& MT5_`U[31ISI_=TYQG_/`U0`0L_DDL>?:],MZ906G:33%K#-1F9&K!X+HZI8]8');9U/9BLPJ/L(\6;'J++*)3Q-HDL(T-NDC7C5I_< M>.N9$:]1ED6H`,K=ZE[U;RG5SLLXSC."S_`$`:O,;XXAMON%_S@8WQQ#;?<+_G`YC?'$-M]PO\`G!5``E>8 MWQQ#;?<+_G`YC?'$-M]PO^<%4`"5YC?'$-M]PO\`G`YC?'$-M]PO^<%4`"5Y MC?'$-M]PO^<#F-\<0VWW"_YP50`)7F-\<0VWW"_YP.8WQQ#;?<+_`)P50`)7 MF-\<0VWW"_YP.8WQQ#;?<+_G!5``E>8WQQ#;?<+_`)P.8WQQ#;?<+_G!5``E M>8WQQ#;?<+_G`YC?'$-M]PO^<%4`"5YC?'$-M]PO^<#F-\<0VWW"_P"<%4`" M5YC?'$-M]PO^<#F-\<0VWW"_YP50`)7F-\<0VWW"_P"<#F-\<0VWW"_YP50` M)7F-\<0VWW"_YP.8WQQ#;?<+_G!5``E>8WQQ#;?<+_G`YC?'$-M]PO\`G!5` M`E>8WQQ#;?<+_G`YC?'$-M]PO^<%4`"5YC?'$-M]PO\`G`YC?'$-M]PO^<%4 M`"5YC?'$-M]PO^<#F-\<0VWW"_YP50`)7F-\<0VWW"_YP.8WQQ#;?<+_`)P5 M0`(6M2[QH+$.9,JUOS(RZA"B.LM4=YE:D/R6F3-*SE*(C(G#,LI/V"Z$KRE^ M[D/XU2?N,<50````E>4OW7O'8GQIS[=,%4```````````E>4OWMJTB>[!JMR MT2#-:QM(\F>TTXC)$992I1&62,C_`.AD*``'-;ZY:;,M>VY%2C5NFUF6GJ,0 M:?,;=<=<,CP1Z3/0GHZ5F6"+V9,R2>A0.5NQ:U1HE1;NBD0TR$:^;SIC3#[1 M^PTK0I62,C(R_F1^TC,C(SVKZM"CWQ;E+BT.OTBI24(-Q34.:V\M*",B-1DE1GC)D6?\`,A*0KKK-(F$BE4IY+[CCZ8JD.$1ON&9$#(UK-0?73*I7*U,7.I:J:W169KT)460TOG#VQ>4RZZ M3J5:484A9I1H7J)"YR[38[B$1W7M6HUF>G:)U*PI2 M4+2A9ZC4E6MS7Y6W9\2A2H[K4V=*;AQ3@T]F0;>B#',T&;39H0E2B_2:++AK M5^F76Z5:@BHW*'5TU0U2C:G5TDHK=`FH(D'..*A?/C6;&2+"S+3TF1HZI MGDM5'*Y0G9$V*Q%G/3HZVT-PVW(YOO:Y#<4Y(_D:Y,J4W( MI[BJC5W&Z;(BU)+!J49]4D+^"IT/(4\B4?Z9DG2>'9"> MJLC2:",E:BR2@]JY=CY68W6*#&:!S:=49CSU(@[:!&A0)S\5;*CEH2\]):D-F25'AUG8DHVR2I1J;< M;(C4I)IWTVI!*WX])-V2;34UNH+>-2=HZ^F44I2U=&GKND9J))$6%&2226,> MU)MFG4FOU6KP$NM/U-#2'VM>6B-"W5ZD)_PFI3RU*QT&HS5C4I1J!;E5?K3D MZ8VAHJ-K2W3W4D9G*022-3Y'G^&:E&E/1TDWK)2DN)QM#/MZE,4&@4RD0UNK MC4^*U$:4Z9&M2&T$DC49$19P19P1#0```````````!*\D_\`=99OP6%_H(%4 M)7DG_NLLWX+"_P!!`"J`````````````````````````````````````9]PU M5B@T"IU>8AU<:GQ79;J6B(UJ0V@U&22,R+."/&3(:`BN4&2Y7Z)7K2H#/.JO M-A.Q'''"6B-#)QHRRZ\25$2B2M)DT65GK0>DD&:TA"V]_:5LZO5^F4B'3;@1 M)J$IJ(TIUADD)6XLDD:C)TSQDRS@C';Q^0+3_LQ7=3+JHT^H52B'"BS67WRB MS)"'C;2LE*T*)M)I5@CP9*(R/'27M'Z5W*9C]>D5VY*=(/H4[Z3N?OP=I_/\` M@[%[1CV?Q%9QGHSI(*H!*\^OCAZV^_G_`"8;RUMK]-^QZVXZGJK7%E05LJ47 MM-"ER$*-/]#4A)F6,I2?0050"5WKJ*.O*LJY&(Z>EQW5#=T)_FK0W(4XK!=. ME"5*/V$1G@@W\I'8[D^G*CX`"J`2OK`MQKIJ$N326O83]8@2*,$>'K'L?C*V^]&/R`50#*H5QT.X-OZ!K--J>PT[7F4I#VSU9T MZM)GC.#QGVX,:H"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H<%Y;.6NW*#5W[4F0JNNHT^H4Z6ZXT MTV;2D-OL23))FX1YT$9%DBZW^72.M6%=<&][3@W#2FI+,*9M-FB2E*7"T.*0 M>229E[4G_/V8`4```"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H2O*7[N0_C5)^XQQ5`)6\O>.Q/C M3GVZ8*H2MY>\=B?&G/MTP50``````````"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H2O*7[N0_C5 M)^XQQ5``E>2?^ZRS?@L+_00*H2O)/_=99OP6%_H(`50```````(#E7Y5:'R9 M>B_3T6I2/2.UV7,FT+T[/1JU:EIQ^\L8S_,;]A77!O>TX-PTIJ2S"F;39HDI M2EPM#BD'DDF9>U)_S]F`%``#E5K=M(:=63IND MC0A"34LSV#QF22,R2VI1D1%D?(]?-OLML.*FNFVZ@W%J1%>645!*4DU2#)!\ MW(E(<29NZ,&VX1XT*P%*`D+CO^D4BG5IUDW9,FG19+R4&RZVQ(<8;6M;+<@T M;-3A:%D:4FI2="\EU%8^^G5Z54[?ESZ?3=M+;FRH3<8WR2E2F92V-:EF753U M-:L$HR+)$2S(B,*`!"LWI595350XE%@JN-A;Q2&7:BM,1*&T1EF:'B9-:C,I MC'0;2>G:=/52:_*F\HOI1F/4X%+S0%/08KS[TC1)0[+0PIK2R25)4DN=,ZC- MQ)E^I@E:2U!?@)"T[P?KDJFIDTUJ+&J]/55*:XW)-U:XZ3:SMDFA)-N8D-=5 M*G"_?UN@C57@`````````````````````E>2?^ZRS?@L+_00*H2O)/\`W66; M\%A?Z"`%4`````````````````````````````````#Y:I4(M*@.S)[NRCMX M(S))J4I1F24I2DB,U*4HR2E*2,U&9$1&9D0R:I<#B9[M+H$/TE5V\&XEQ2V8 MT=C*?90E,0E$9*1 M'01?I)/*B,S-2U%I):UDE.`^716+GZ7%R:'0U=9!,K-$V8@^C#A*1F,DRR>$ MGMNLD]3*DJ0=!2Z;!I$!J#2H4:#":SLX\9I+3:,F9GA*2(BR9F?_`%,Q]0`` M```````````````````,JNVY0[@V'IZC4VI[#5LN>Q4/;/5C5IU$>,X+./;@ MAE>KBQ^#;;[K8_$50`/R+RW<@=5?NZ?7;>W?IU"ERH42-#;ULFVMTV8^="&] M)%M%:CP?L,SZ3Z!^A>1FU)UD6LL&HB/V*+^7 MMR/KY2_=R'\:I/W&.*H````2O*7[N0_C5)^XQQ5"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H!*WE M[QV)\:<^W3!5"5O+WCL3XTY]NF"J``````'(+CI\6ETJ]ZI:#7HV+3K?G,.S MHJC2N?.TFHUK=SJ<=8V1EM3-9FN0X6HEH<(PZ^`Y!<=-@T:K5RC4>%&@4A[= MW:P8K26F'-O4W6G]3:2))[1M*4+R7621)/)%@6')_&8I\^[Z;`9:BTZ%5D-Q M8K*"0TPA4**XI*$%T)(UK6HR(BRI:C]IF`]>4OW)>3/J%E)%J]IDGK#;WHJ_`ER?/IWF@ M%4)7DG_NLLWX+"_T$!O15^!+D^?3O-!R3_W66;\%A?Z"`%4```"?JEE6K5Y[ MLZJVU1)TUW&TD28#3KB\$1%E2DF9X(B+_H1"@`!RJ^N0:Q[MYC_L'H3FNO\` MX*RQ&VVK3_$_3/5C3T?TU'_4:UKD.:E&KKK MT%G&<%T=!$1"_`!BT2T[S+U MFV149+=$S76ER:>@D<\D0=K)9/5E2HKVLEMF980>U-\EI0@G"7^H;ET`#F%0 MY)8DIRNDRY2(Z:DB>:994=M4]+DM+I+VD@U96VDWEX2E*%82A)K,B5KJF;?J M-/M6HTRBU9J)49,J7)9G.1-J3!R)+CQ_IFLB4:2<-)&9X,R(S(RRD4H`(6#9 M]9@-TY^'5Z0U5(*)$=MST6\IA;+ZFG'#6A4DW%O&XR2C=-WIU+U)-1ZAY4WD MZ]%LQZ9`JF*`EZ#*>8>CZY*W8B&$M:7B4E*4GS5G41MJ,_U,&G46F_`!(6G9 M[]#E4U4FI-2HU(IZJ736VXQM+1'4;6=LHUJ)QS$=KK)2V7[^KTD2:\`````` M````````````````!*\D_P#=99OP6%_H(%4.8BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\"7)\^G>:`5 M0"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ_`ER?/IWF@%4`E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\"7)\^G>:`50"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ_`ER?/IWF@ M%4`E=Z*OP)BK\"7)\^G>:#>BK\"7)\^G>: M`50"5WHJ_`ER?/IWF@WHJ_`ER?/IWF@%4`E=Z*OP)0:)LQ!].6S2O,9 M)E@LJ+;=91:65)2LY^ER*VF>U5*_:%R5*KMY)M3;L%F-'+!IRU'. M/\B&T`#*I]N4.G4J33*?1J;$ILG5MXC$5#;+NI))5J0185E)$1Y+I(L#ZZ73 M8-(@-0:5"C0836=G'C-):;1DS,\)21$63,S_`.IF/J`!*\I?NY#^-4G[C'%4 M)7E+]W(?QJD_<8XJ@`2O)/\`W66;\%A?Z"!5"5Y)_P"ZRS?@L+_00`J@```` M$_5+*M6KSW9U5MJB3IKN-I(DP&G7%X(B+*E),SP1$7_0B`>UZ7-3K.M>H5^L MJ=3!A():R:1K6HS424I27]34I)%DR+IZ3(LF-"DU"+5Z5#J5/=VT*8RB0PYI M-.MM:24D\&1&62,N@RR.2PB`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`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`'O3 MA*4EU,D1$>E(+6Y1Z-78=,4OG,67+9BK=2<5]4=AU]EMU#*I.S)K49.MD1&H MC4:DD1941!ZR*$JMM0F9&N.J$],4_H<)2DH=8;:V39IR\EU3YDVMO42S1I1K M,^CY;?Y.O1%JE1O2FVQ-IP]/3GR.2I5-@Q'8"3;)M#T5UHWR-673,XJ4N$1H2M)]5+1Y-05[%XT)UE# MKD[FJ#VI*YZRY%-I3:"<6EPG4I-M6S/:$E>#-!&LB-)&9;<20B5%9D-$ZEMY M"7$DZVIM9$99+4A1$I)_U(R(R]AD(J!8!,49%,YW!@Q52N?.M4:F-0DH```)7DG_`+K+-^"PO]!`JA*\D_\`=99OP6%_H(`50``````` M````````````````/*7)8AQ7I4QYIB,PA3CKKJR2AM"2R:E&?01$1&9F8RJW M7T092*=!CNSZRZ@EM16TJ)"",S(EO.DDTLM]59ZE=*M"R0E:BTG\D2W%SI3- M1NIQJH2VUI?CPS2E<2GN$>24R1I)2W"P1;5>59U&@FB6I`#RVU2NK_L:Y-)H M!]1Q;T=V/-EE_B)LE&E4=)8TZU)UJRHT;/"'54%+I\6E0&H4OW4OW7O'8GQIS[=,%4```````````E M>4OWL>Q^,K;[T8_(50`)7UCV/QE;?>C'Y!ZQ['XRMOO1C\A5``E M?6/8_&5M]Z,?D'K'L?C*V^]&/R%4`"5]8]C\96WWHQ^0>L>Q^,K;[T8_(50` M)7UCV/QE;?>C'Y!ZQ['XRMOO1C\A5``E?6/8_&5M]Z,?D'K'L?C*V^]&/R%4 M`"5]8]C\96WWHQ^0>L>Q^,K;[T8_(50`)7UCV/QE;?>C'Y!ZQ['XRMOO1C\A M5``E?6/8_&5M]Z,?D'K'L?C*V^]&/R%4`"5]8]C\96WWHQ^0>L>Q^,K;[T8_ M(50`)7UCV/QE;?>C'Y!ZQ['XRMOO1C\A5``E?6/8_&5M]Z,?D'K'L?C*V^]& M/R%4`"5]8]C\96WWHQ^0>L>Q^,K;[T8_(50`)7UCV/QE;?>C'Y!R3_W66;\% MA?Z"!5````````````````````#%K=QQ*9*1`9;=J-9<03K=,AJ;.0IO)D;A MDM24H;+!EK6I*9-N:XHO:EN.\T9-IS@M;A&9Z5$3>%(='K$MQ"RM1FH_:9F-```````````````````` M```````````````````!*\I?NY#^-4G[C'%4)7E+]W(?QJD_<8XJ@```!*\I M?NY#^-4G[C'%4)7E+]W(?QJD_<8XJ@$K>7O'8GQIS[=,%4)6\O>.Q/C3GVZ8 M*H``````````!*\I?NY#^-4G[C'%4)7E+]W(?QJD_<8XJ@`````````````` M`````````````````````````````````````````````2OK$M!?5A7'3:C( M/]L6FO%-D+_KH99U.*P63/2D\$1F>"(S`50"5WRYS_P:W+DJ6G^)_L/,=G_3 M_MBF=>>G]FK&.G&4Y>F+KE_J4^U(T9HNJ:*Q54L/&K^I)CMOI-/LZ361Y(^J M1$1F%4`E>:7P[^IZ9MN+KZVP]$OO[+/^#:BH1)-6:]I,5B?(J+* M5?\`,39J_.0^SKPBTV*J.[18T%;SB&J,AF,A:W2;)2 MEELS(SPT@L]'L_GT8"/Y"^4^\^5?TVP^=$I#4'8:Y46,XMXDN;0C2A"UFG5U MWT2CPJ+%7'@(=)*UFXXX\\M]UU>"+4MQPU+6>"2DC49X2 ME)%T$1%(G9Z].G2A./WGG.?Y"_``````` M`````````````````````````````````````$KRE^[D/XU2?N,<50E>4OW< MA_&J3]QCBJ````$KRE^[D/XU2?N,<50E>4OW\=B?&G/M MTP50E;R]X[$^-.?;I@J@````$K:U:K%<;N9J5%C4N;!F\UBH7E_9I5%8>0;Q M)41*41O=9*%$71I)2L:SJAE4:D>C:C796WVOI2:F9IT:=EB.RSISGI_@ZL]' M[L8Z,F$4=VW!3K3N>K5%ZFSN;32IM*M)"JLJIR*I2G7IM0C39"'C;5L::]3U,]5)DAQAY:G$JP9*ZV,I6DR+ M!D9J3095)LV%1X-2T5",R@E3U,$K;OD9*<=<09];:+U&OK$H]:C)9*/47M;% M&?I2:B_/EM2ZC4I7.Y3C+)LM:R:;922$&I9I+0RC.5*RK4?01DD@S^4OW M>HVHBZBDK<;5I(^`?^BI?'_S6V__`+A_P0'Z_KMQT.W]AZ>K--IFWU;+GLI# M.TTXU:=1EG&2SCV9(96_]`7UH3E2J,<_VRJ;299:4VK!Y(]*CP9 M&1X,C(/5Q8_!MM]UL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q`-YZK(Z*?9M;6ES^!(E.Q8[*B/\` M:M9&Z;S:?89D;1K26>IJ+2&WOB3^EZ.MNFZO^]<_?G;/^?\`!V+.O/L_B)QG M/3C2;U<6/P;;?=;'XAZN+'X-MONMC\0#T)<\S_B5WKBQ^#;;[K8_$`]75F*Z7[5HDET^E;\J$V^\ZK^:EN+(U+4 M?M-2C,S,S,S,S%4)7U<6/P;;?=;'XAZN+'X-MONMC\0%4`E?5Q8_!MM]UL?B M'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q`50"5]7%C\&VWW6Q^(>KBQ^#;;[K8_$!5`)7U<6/P;;?=;' MXAZN+'X-MONMC\0%4`E?5Q8_!MM]UL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q`50"5]7%C\&VWW6 MQ^(>KBQ^#;;[K8_$!5`)7U<6/P;;?=;'XAZN+'X-MONMC\0%4`E?5Q8_!MM] MUL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q`50"5]7%C\&VWW6Q^(>KBQ^#;;[K8_$!5`)7U<6/P;; M?=;'XAZN+'X-MONMC\0%4`E?5Q8_!MM]UL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q`50"5]7%C\& MVWW6Q^(>KBQ^#;;[K8_$!5`)7U<6/P;;?=;'XAZN+'X-MONMC\0%4`E?5Q8_ M!MM]UL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q`50"5]7%C\&VWW6Q^(>KBQ^#;;[K8_$!5`)7U<6 M/P;;?=;'XAZN+'X-MONMC\0%4`E?5Q8_!MM]UL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q`50"5]7 M%C\&VWW6Q^(>KBQ^#;;[K8_$`Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*HRK5I%+I\ZE6U1(,U MJM4K9R(T!IIQ&9\@V MY&=KE1:6IITHRB*/&<(\&3[Y]1!I/3J;3K=(E$HFU$/+=3TU^O>3OI+7UO16 MK-/8_P#!L\%M\82>IXE=9.M"6LZ2I8D9B'%9BPV6F(S"$MM--()*&T)+!)21 M=!$1$1$1#U`````````````````````````````````````````````````` M``');>Y9(58Y;ZM8B6&DQHZ%,Q99&O6]*:(S>;-)IP1$1+(CZ"_1,\JUI(NM M`````````````````````)7E+]W(?QJD_<8XJA*\I?NY#^-4G[C'%4````)7 ME+]W(?QJD_<8XJA*\I?NY#^-4G[C'%4`E;R]X[$^-.?;I@VJW6Z508J)57O'8GQIS[=,'+_P"U2NFLQ:,J M?4+?C29$6=":;K4%^0@D.$SK?94RA9MO-FE&DS3_`(S_`*8,.ZQI+$ILW(KS M3S:5K;-3:R41+0HTK3DOYDI)I,OY&1E_(>HYA_9^J,:M6U6ZPQ/I$R34:LY( MF%28CT>,T]L64FE)/$2U&HDI<4HR+*G%>W&3Z>```````"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&. M*H2O*7[N0_C5)^XQQ5````````````````````````````````#/K=9IU#BH MD566U&;<6331*/*WG#(S)MM!=9QP\'A"2-1^PB,8O/;BK_13(WH&FJ_[Y.;) MD/Z4N2Q#BO2ICS3$9A"G'775DE#:$EDU* M,^@B(B,S,Q->F:Y6^K;E-YA$/_WE6F%HS_Y<3*75=)*2>T-G&24G:$/6):;# MLIF=<G_\`D:5;3V*3^BEW2I.E>CVCY*M:-8KU*FQZ]<>MUQE;;#4&(<>( MA9I,DN.M&XM3^,F2FUN&RM."4WDM1VH`/S!2?[*TJD56'4J??>QFPWD2&'/0 MY*T.(42DG@WC(\&1=!E@=ZB5Q^E2F:==TB"S)D+2B'.:2;$>8M1X)I*5K4:' MB,\$V:E:RZR#/"TMTH\I<9B9%>BS&6GXSZ%-NM.H)2'$*+!I41]!D9&9&1@/ M4!*[>=:?34Y7/;;3U2E.$HY$!/\`)3[AJ/:M%G!NX)2"2E3FLC<=12Q)+$R* MS*AO-/QGT)<:=:62D.(4624DRZ#(R,C(R`>H````````````````E>4OW4OW%SQZZW3+48O>G\SSSB73;7:J4>7K2A2="UN)QH MZQ'@O:9E_(=`O+WCL3XTY]NF#DO]H*H6_- M++S3ZUI4E)LFEN3&-6K6E;IZ4G^X@O\`D+7-.LTQ%.4I M:B29J:809I0V>3U.&ZH^E1CHHYKR!V_Z"L^6ZU1XU$A52;S^)3X]1Y^EI MHV6D$>WZ27K-M3A8,RPLBS_(NE```)^AW?1ZU#K$V)(T4^EO&R]+?PVRI),M MO&ZE1^UK0XDR7T$9=8LI,E&%``E8MXJ50G*K4;=K=*:/8)CLS4L$])<>42&V MTH2ZK0HUJ0DR=T$1K+)D1*,M6WJTW6F97^RR84N(]S>5$DZ#<84OWBHY]!P**HCU)/H4ER2XC:*R19)326%(U&65&25%M42C4ZAQ5 MQZ5$:C-N+-UTTEE;SAD1&XXL^LXX>"RM1FH_:9F`Q?\`UGKO_P"EX!_^5)J" MO_\`=AG!E_\`GZDJ_P#9J(:%$MFG4F4NE)#:````````````$U+IM1HTIZ=;A-/1'5J?E4E:<;59GE2XZ MS426G%9-2DJ(T+41=+9K<<.E`!GT2LTZN15R*5+:DMMK-ITDGA;+A$1FVX@^ MLVX62RA1$HO89$-`8M;HS\B4BHT:6U3ZPA!,F^XR;S3S63/9O-DI!K(C4I23 M)25)49X/2I:5J)7T3I2Z=.CNP*RT@UNQ7$J-"R(R(ULNFDDO-]9!ZD]*=:"6 ME"CTD&T`````````````E>4OW4 MOW4A"5[-MM));;ZA&2"SISC)BO$!R*>E-U96\.\GIKGJ^?>G- M/\?0WM.:Z.KS;5G1IZ/W8Z!?@`D&Z`^^U?\`&G06GXU9E&;++L@VD26E0([) MDI:,J;(U(6DSQJ+&2(^C->`#E3=KS%1*J[1;:]`4_;4N2S1B..TIUV++-]]Q M*65J:)3C9--I4I1&9MD2M*22H6%EQ)K;]P5&?#=@JJM03+;BO+0IUI"8S#&% M[-2D9,V5*+2I754G.#R14H`.=Z_5TOO5:E-J2U5I3;1$QWLJ+.G4AQ>K5M59_9C&/Y^T0O)?RAQ>4&OR*13;6NE M,E$53Z5)O::I"<+0DC<-3B32WE99-!+47\D*'3^5NT?6_2DV_!GD]O"7#V/,= MCIU+;7JU;16?V8QC^?M`4$?DKA52!,9O*74JE'EZ/]VIK4]<9E*3U$DS6^9N MJ)1EE9DDCT(,FT'JS0;ATCMER?4=1\<50`)7<.D=LN3ZCJ/CAN'2.V7)]1U' MQQ5``E=PZ1VRY/J.H^.&X=([94N2Q M#BO2ICS3$9A"G'775DE#:$EDU*,^@B(B,S,P$UN'2.V7)]1U'QPW#I';+D^H MZCXX]:?>]`F6C2[CY^TS3JDA!QB6HE...*(SV"4(-1K>R2D[-&I6I)D1&9#R M]+W%6.I1*/Z*CGTE/K22/4D^E*FXS:]HK)%@TNJ84C41X49*20>4NS*##BO2 MIE2N!B,PA3CKKMS5!*&T)+)J49OX(B(C,S,3/HV%4^BU8%W5-I70BH2+GGQ( M2C]N26IXW5I-.#2XTTXA6I.%8U&FPB6;3BE,S*L_.KDYE:74/5-_:(0XD^HX MAA))8;<21$1+;;2KV].5*,Z4!S6G\E##G.3N2Y+DJS4IE3#U/*KRVH6D\$>E M!O+=Z4E@R6ZLCU*Z"+!)VXG)U08<5F+#=N!B,PA+;335PU!*&T)+!)21/X(B M(B(B(5X`)7<.D=LN3ZCJ/CAN'2.V7)]1U'QQ5``E=PZ1VRY/J.H^.&X=([9< MGU'4?'%4`"5W#I';+D^HZCXX;ATCMER?4=1\<50`)7<.D=LN3ZCJ/CAN'2.V M7)]1U'QQ5``E=PZ1VRY/J.H^.&X=([94OW\=B?&G/MTP%);`6'(A+74J!6:DKF++<^K/2D M08=634D0S6ALW$&ZDS21J=(IDFB.H=J;R MW6J+"=C1H[AI09H3M2)Q?09*R98+7H3A*$D750```````2O*7[N0_C5)^XQQ M5"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H``````````````````34N2_<I]+>=8I3"U-3I[*S2MQ:3PJ M.PHNDC(R,G'2_9TH0>TU*9H(D9B'%9BPV6F(S"$MM--()*&T)+!)21=!$1$1 M$1`$2,Q#BLQ8;+3$9A"6VFFD$E#:$E@DI(N@B(B(B(AZ@``````````````` M`)J7?5MQY3T1JJM3YS"U-O0Z8A+7;[ MF0-@W-A4VV-OJ2E^YZK'9S[,K9;96YMM&2-25+:]J2)76,TA?CY:I4H-(@.S MJK-C0836-I(DNI:;1DR(LJ49$63,B_ZF0YIZ1KM7Z3D7=4$EU'X]'HS=%9V9 M_P`C.>HGC4KK%K8=(TD1?L5A2OKI=FU9F>U4(U)M&D51C.FHR2D5R8]J(T], MAPV'4X3U>E2\I,DEI))$84&^T65T4&DUNM*_<2HL(V65M_\`Q$/R#;9<2?1@ MT+4:B,C21IR9?DJ[N76L/X8)\SIM+VE/:B[0Y3:V%*,G'%);=2VXHSPL MB2LDF;;1:E:24?ZUW-YS_P`9N.Y*EI_A_P"W>C]^K&.C&59 MCZER!63-OV%<94]IB,PC]6DLMI3$?=3C0LT%T$1$1ZD%U5GI,_\`&2PJXC5X MS(K,J'=%K/QGT)<:=:HCRD.(4624DRFX,C(R,C(>O,;XXAMON%_S@>K^W&NB MGQ)-):]IL4>?(IS*E?\`,;<=:$FKV%J,LF1$6<$6&Z4QG].FW?C/LU:%XSG2K&#>F+KB?J5"U(TEH^J2*/54OO$K^ MIID-L))/MZ269Y,NJ9&9D#F-\<0VWW"_YP.8WQQ#;?<+_G`WRYM_QFW+DINK M^'_L//MI_7_L:GM&.C]^G.>C.%8>L2T$=6;<=-IT@OW1:D\4*0C^FME[2XG) M8,M22R1D99(R,`]`W'+_`%*A>,F,Z75)%'I\=ADT_P!33(2^HU>WI)9%@BZI M&1F;=>K\=W)\BG>5%+$DL3(K,J&\T_&?0EQIUI9*0XA19)23+H,C(R,C(>H" M5W7J_'=R?(IWE0W7J_'=R?(IWE15``E=UZOQWK\=W)\BG>5'.N7*T;ZGVB5+M6J7!7WYJS1(2_(AQ&V6<'JR;:65+-6=. ME6M!I->4DHD&7;P`<%_LPV?=5GMU&%>=N-15(1_L%1-UAYQ#:E93+/>@```````````````````````````````````34NE3:/ M*>J-NK==96M3TBC&:$M/J4>7'&5&1&V\9];!J)M2M6HDJ<4ZG5HE8A5J*N1` M6Z:4+-MQMYE;#K2\$>E;;A)6@\&E1$HBRE23+H,C/0&+6Z&N9*14*7.=IE60 M@F^<-MI<0^@C-26GD*+KMDHS/H-*RU+)"T:U9#:`8M$KZ)TI=.G1W8%9:0:W M8KB5&A9$9$:V73227F^L@]2>E.M!+2A1Z2V@```!*\I?NY#^-4G[C'%4)7E+ M]W(?QJD_<8XJ@```!*\I?NY#^-4G[C'%4)7E+]W(?QJD_<8XJ@$K>7O'8GQI MS[=,'-.6NX*Z=V4]FV8=[T^72-H2JA2[9;J#,I+S;9Z4K4XG*2_Q)P9&M*3, MLMI,NEWE[QV)\:<^W3!5`(#D4J-=J=JRGKGD5N1-3-6A"JQ1FZ6\3>ALR(FD M*42DY-77SDSR7\A?@````````)7E+]W(?QJD_<8XJA*\I?NY#^-4G[C'%4`` M`````````````E=I*N[KP)TF!;I="9,51)>J1'T&:%F1FVQC)$XC"UF9*0I" M4I4Z]\__`*4^Z_\`];_6_P#*_C50#RB1F(<5F+#9:8C,(2VTTT@DH;0DL$E) M%T$1$1$1$/4````>4:2Q*;-R*\T\VE:VS4VLE$2T*-*TY+^9*2:3+^1D9?R` M>H#RER6(<5Z5,>:8C,(4XZZZLDH;0DLFI1GT$1$1F9F(JM\K%FTF*B0JL-2V M'%DRT_#2;L=;QD9DR2H\$DVIBC-*TK(C(E))NS?M=Z:O6^81U_K)1SM?44?\` M@V40H[B,$9]!RWTEC![0\.$'0*[<=#M_8>GJS3:9M]6RY[*0SM-.-6G499QD MLX]F2$U6^4>)3HJ)*:9.:B.+)A$VK*;I,=+QD9DA?.E(=Q@M1J0TOHSI)1I- M)>5"Y,8-.VZGJK4EKE:7))0EI@;5TL]=3S!)D.8U+QMGG3/49J-:NL*6B6I0 M*'*7+I5'@QISB#;=F)9(Y#Q&9&>T>/KN&9D1F:C,S/I,S/I`0F]ES5[JTYB2 MTT?M30X*GU.-ETD^S.FI8BJ2HS26E+;IJ2>I)F1ZD-RZY6^M6XE-?U?J$[<4 ME=6S_))*@-DS%9=))X-QI2L8465ZU+'50`2$2REG%9C5*X*N]$:0E+<*`M-- MCL&18(FN;$ATFTEE*4+=61%C.HR)1;5"MRAV_M_0-&IM,V^G:\RBH9VFG.G5 MI(LXR>,^S)C5``````````````````$U+L*TI4IZ6[;=(3.>6IU4QJ(AN03A MGDW$O)(EI>D>6Y$-G]2FUBY(4LOV/^F9$K1_7].0MQI62R76 M0>,Y+!D1E5``E?0ESP_^&W=SK7^_TU3&G]./9L^;G'Q[3SJUYP6-.#RVE\0_ MT^;VW6,];;\X?ING_P`&ST2,^S.K66>JQ^BH6;6T);_CR(KL M60RDB_>:2 MVG)X(M2BR9D19,R(50`,JA7'0[@V_H<VI[#3M>92D/;/5G3JTF>,X/&?;@ MQZU^LTZWJ-+JU:EM0Z=%1M'GG#Z$E["Z"Z3,S,B(BR9F9$1&9D/*NVY0[@V' MIZC4VI[#5LN>Q4/;/5C5IU$>,X+./;@ASKE5Y%*)=EHO4ZWFVJ#+;64B,W%- M34-;Q$99<81U,F2M)N$G61$GI,BTF%U8MWT>^+;CUNWY&VB.]5:%8)QAPB+4 MVXG_``J+)='L,C(R,R,C.@'!>0WD1J5ET8YTRYJO2J[/07.HU.4PMAM'0:4* M)UMQ*W$]/7+V:E)3DLJ5U#T=>;7Z;%RT1QI/50N51'%O*27L-:D24)-7]32A M)&><)270050"5](WFU^H_;5$<:3UEHBUMQ;RDE[20E<9"35_0E+21GC*DETD MWMF,_J5*T+DA1"_>_LX\K1_3]..\XZK)X+JH/&,$>-"B79;E>E+BT.OTBI24(-Q34.: MV\M*",B-1DE1GC)D6?\`,@&T`````````````````````````````#/K=*8J M\5#3RW67FED]'DLF1.QW2(R)Q!F1EG!F1D9&E25*2HE)4I)Y42L/T:4S2[D6 MZM3BTMQ*H3)[*3D\)2\:2T,O9-*<'I2XI2=GTJ-INE'E+C,3(KT68RT_&?0I MMUIU!*0XA18-*B/H,C(S(R,!Z@)75.M/ID/5*L4)702MDJ3+A'[$IPVDW'VC M+!:C)3J5=91K2I2FJ6))8F1694-YI^,^A+C3K2R4AQ"BR2DF709&1D9&0":Y M2_=R'\:I/W&.*H2O*7[N0_C5)^XQQ5````"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H2O*7[N0_C M5)^XQQ5`)6\O>.Q/C3GVZ8*H2MY>\=B?&G/MTP50````#*B7%1Y;-6>CU&,J M/27EQYSQK(FX[B$)6LE+/HZJ5%J/."/)'@R,BU1(6G%109-Z+YB[%IS=0;@QSIA$.[J1<%4J\"Y&79+T%U<5J#(B28L6.Z3K3:5*2 MC:*2LGG5FSJ66U-"%+-+1JJ^3WG',ZIGTEZ*Y[_NSTEMN<;#8M:M>W_6_C;? M&TZ<8QU-(!RE^[D/XU2?N,<50YURK1KC5`:,. M*]*F71:S$9A"G'77:(\E#:$EDU*,YN"(B(S,S`5XE??/_P"E/NO_`/6_UO\` MROXTTFF7]=<5Q%5J=OPZ(M:5M,KHTA+LYK"B-$EDY)&VV9Z5;/4:E)ZKA)(U MMG2\QOCB&V^X7_.`*H!*\QOCB&V^X7_.!S&^.(;;[A?\X`J@'.KOK==LZC*J MMRWC:T""E:6]HN@2%&I:O8E*4RS4H_:>"(^@C/V$9B:IY,5LVXM;M9EM2UN&ENWWDD:U MJ-2U8*9[34HU&?\`,S,_Y@)^)R-4AV4S*N2LW!7GV5I?83+J#NB&\1YUQEYV M[19_P[56<)-1K4A*BM:):E`H#&G.(-MV8EDCD/$9D9[1X^NX9F1&9 MJ,S,^DS,^D9_,;XXAMON%_S@8WQQ#;?<+_`)P.8WQQ#;?<+_G`#U?6PU_PVF>A\_O]"R':;M?Z;3FZD:\= M.-6<9/&,GEN>]'ZE(NFY*='/I4USEN;E7_-KEMO.%T8+22B3T9(B,S,W,;XX MAMON%_S@C&,XU*QDW,;XXAMON%_ MS@-/:=<7@C,\)2HS/!$9_]",4`BJI;]U5>`[!JM5M&="=QM(\FW'76UX, MC+*53#(\&1'_`-2(3_JNF-=-/?M&DN^PWZ/0I-.>4G_E-R/-0HT^P])G@S(C MQDBP%-3>4BUZE?LVSX=3:4. MF[?GM_TVK[33IY[;I)V6,YT[%]OVY+.K/L+&.G(7X"`KK'*FSL/0-1LB;G5M M>>P)471[-.G2\YJSTYSC&"]N>C)Y[ROP_P#B4*VY6O\`9Z%B*?TX]NTYQ+CX M]I8TZ\X/.G!9#JH#E6\UY1^I5W/1T@^E+6YTN;E/_-KB3'FRZ MBKE4.]+-J49"S;4[#I+CR$K(B,TF:9IEG!D>/\R&AS&^.(;;[A?\X`J@$KS& M^.(;;[A?\X',;XXAMON%_P`X`J@$KS&^.(;;[A?\X',;XXAMON%_S@"J$U+I M4VCRGJC;JW765K4](HQFA+3ZE'EQQE1D1MO&?6P:B;4K5J)*G%.I\N8WQQ#; M?<+_`)P.8WQQ#;?<+_G`&?>%8A5JTHTB`MTTHKM*;<;>96PZTOTA&/2MMPDK M0>#2HB4192I)ET&1G=#\=_VI8=ZU2OP8#M.=J<2,AHG9U+HDF,TZ\XLTM-*4 MI;B733M,(,E="GUI+I,R'Z5Y):[5;AL*F2[CI\ZGUM"-A-:F1EL+4ZCH-PB4 MA)866%]4M):C3G*3`5X``"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H2O*7[N0_C5)^XQQ5`)6\O> M.Q/C3GVZ8*H2MY>\=B?&G/MTP50``````````"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H2O*7[N M0_C5)^XQQ5``````#RER6(<5Z5,>:8C,(4XZZZLDH;0DLFI1GT$1$1F9F`2Y M+$.*]*F/-,1F$*<===624-H2634HSZ"(B(S,S$_$C/W'*9J%49=8I3"TNP8# MR#2MQ:3RF0^D^DC(R(VVC_9T+66TTI91(S]QRF:A5&76*4PM+L&`\@TK<6D\ MID/I/I(R,B-MH_V="UEM-*6:4``!%5F_XOI55$M.-O'7T/(9?CQG#3'A$:ED MI4F025):T[-?4Z5F9$1)/.0%A+DL0XKTJ8\TQ&80IQUUU9)0VA)9-2C/H(B( MC,S,,F9 MX_S,9^X%`1U83=2IT3ZRSQG!8(B(GHJ[X_Z4*Z*:_'3^URI4 MC/MTZUXSC4K&3;RUMK]-^QZVXZGJK7%E05LJ47M-"ER$*-/]#4A)F6,I2?0 M54`"5WYIR.I*IMR,2$]#C7H&8[H5_-.MMI3:L'T:D*4D_:1F6##UBV8GH?NJ MB1G2Z%L2IK;#S2OYI6VLR4A1>PTJ(C(R,C(C(50`.2_V@>42@6?2:9!J;SKM M1?J$*:F)&(E.$RQ*;=6LR,R(B,FE)3D^LKV=!*-/2J!6:=<-&B5:BRVIE.E( MVC+S9]"B]A]!])&1D9&1X,C(R,B,C'$.7CD1MFK4ZFU&A,1K?FHFQ(*^914I M9=;?D(9RIM)I+4DW=1*+!F1&D\]4T]?L6T*/8]MQZ);\?8Q&NLM:L&X^X9%J M<<5_B4>"Z?81$1$1$1$04```"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H2O*7[N0_C5)^XQQ5`)6 M\O>.Q/C3GVZ8*H2MY>\=B?&G/MTP50``````````"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H2O* M7[N0_C5)^XQQ5```/EJE0BTJ`[,GN[*.W@C,DFI2E&9)2E*2(S4I2C)*4I(S M49D1$9F1`%4J$6E0'9D]W91V\$9DDU*4HS)*4I21&:E*49)2E)&:C,B(C,R( M8D2,_<U$MAQN+-?=DU9Y!K MC4J"TJ1,D82M7491E6#V:RU'A)&72HAE*FW1=RFU4$W;7HA+4ER7/A9J#^AU M)998.Q/C M3GVZ8*H2MY>\=B?&G/MTP50``````````"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H2O*7[N0_C5 M)^XQQ052H1:5`=F3W=E';P1F234I2C,DI2E)$9J4I1DE*4D9J,R(B,S(@"J5 M"+2H#LR>[LH[>",R2:E*49DE*4I(C-2E*,DI2DC-1F1$1F9$,FET^5/GM5FO M-;*0WDX4`U$I,))D9&I1D9DI]23,E*(S)!&:$&9&M;LU+KBSJ;TER"[6+HBH M4J!;T1Q*O1YJ1E)R72,VF7EH4?76HB).I#.OKJ=T)EEN7,\R_?,OGL='2BC1 M%K;@$>M#B=L6$&73LDF9Y#V3=C]>E.1+*C-3F4H2I5:?4?H].HU M),FEIR@TJ=0KH'K;-G-TV2W4JY49-PU].%%4)R$%S=6S)"RC- MI(DL)5@\DDLJSUE*P0J@```````````````````````````````````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M```````````2O*7[N0_C5)^XQQ5"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H````2O*7[N0_C5)^ MXQQ5"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H!*WE[QV)\:<^W3!5"5O+WCL3XTY]NF"J`````

,\ MJ-3B354JB-.-U5>TFMNEM$/F;2&CU)5DL&VVA)EC!X]G2>0YU6UR*%4*S1*= M/J10%^@_X\YY]Y/.Z@Y'?TO.*4XG4TA)%I46DRU)TJ,S%78IN,R[GIG.)+T2 MFU-,>+SE];[B&U1(SQD;BS-:^NZX>5&9D1D1=!$1?5'L^C,0)D0V)+Z9>C:O M2IK\A_J'J;TO.+4XG0HS4C2HM"C-2<*,S&A1*/"HL5<>`ATDK6;CCCSRWW75 MX(M2W'#4M9X)*2-1GA*4D701$0?F#^T%RUW'0;]JEJ0X5(73J?*@RVG'6G#= M4MO822)1DX18UD1'@BZO^?2*6PKF>OR!!NB[5U*/(7M$,IHU`FOJ:01J;4EF M232R92M.HE[(S>,R(]NDDI:;T.6SD4MRO5=^ZYDVKHJ-0J%.B.MM.MDTE#C[ M$8S21MF>=!F99,^M_ET#JO)W9\2Q+78H%,FSI<&.M:V3F&V:VR4K4:2-"$Y+ M4:CZ2,^L?3C!$&50+CM>WJ-$I-%I%P0Z=%1LV66[;J.$E[3Z38R9F9F9F>3, MS,S,S,QH;^4CL=R?3E1\`50`)7?RD=CN3Z]VTZITNGPX MT:MH="+I,ATH2O*7[N0_C5)^XQQ5`` M``"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H2O*7[N0_C5)^XQQ5`)6\O>.Q/C3GVZ8*H2MY>\=B? M&G/MTP50``````````"5Y2_=R'\:I/W&.*H2O*7[N0_C5)^XQQ5````````` M```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` M`````````````````````````````````````````````````E>4OW4OW7O'8GQIS[=,%4```````````E>4OW3#<::DFA1-..MFXA*\=!J22DFHB/&2)19_J7M`>H#FIW;<%.M.YZ MM47J;.YM-*FTIR'37D)=?VB8YJ<;)UQPTE)6ILTH+49-*4DEZTD*JRJG(JE* M=>FU"--D(>-M6QIKU/4SU4F2'&'EJ<2K!DKK8RE:3(L&1F'R\I?NY#^-4G[C M'%4)7E+]W(?QJD_<8XJ@``````````````````````&?0ZJQ683DJ*AU#;.Q/C3GVZ8*H2MY>\=B?&G/MT MP50```````)^DT&52;-A4>#4M%0C,H)4]3!*V[Y&2G'7$&?6VB]1KZQ*/6HR M62CU%[6Q1GZ4FHOSY;4NHU*5SN4XRR;+6LFFV4DA!J6:2T,HSE2LJU'T$9)) M&NJB2[=.NQ*@U(I.M;:9#)*63JTNFUI;(BRX9N%I222/69EIU9+*/=%(?IG/ MTR'6V"E-0EI>CNM.MO.+0AM"VE)):#4;C9EJ2756E7[3(P&)?7)[0[E04A5" MHCM47-AO/2Y,1"G'&FGVE.(->DU'EI"D8/H,C(CP0^OU<6/P;;?=;'XC0HET M4BMREQZ=(=6X2#=;-R.ZTB0V1D1N,K6DDO-]9/7;-2>N@\]9.4>ZJ))M>3<< M:H-/T2.A]QR6T2EHT,J4EQ2<%E1$:%8-.N@\]9.0S_`%<6 M/P;;?=;'XAZN+'X-MONMC\15``E?5Q8_!MM]UL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q%4`"5]7 M%C\&VWW6Q^(>KBQ^#;;[K8_$50`)7U<6/P;;?=;'XAZN+'X-MONMC\15``E? M5Q8_!MM]UL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q&TJLTY-?;HARVO2SD54THI'E9,I6E!K/^A: ME$19QGIQG2>/EC712)-9.ELR'3DZUM)6<=U+#CB,ZVVWC3LUN)TKRA*C46A> M2+0K`9_JXL?@VV^ZV/Q&5;7)9:L"G/,U2UK;DR%39;R5^CFEX:`Q?5Q8 M_!MM]UL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q'U5"\*-`DR(SK\EZ7'>..Y'B0GY+Q*)MMPSV;: M%*-))>:RLBTD;B2,R,R(*A>-"@\V-V=M&GV4RB?C,N2&6V%9TO.N-I4EIH\* M,G%FE)DE1YPE6`^7U<6/P;;?=;'XAZN+'X-MONMC\15``E?5Q8_!MM]UL?B' MJXL?@VV^ZV/Q%4`"5]7%C\&VWW6Q^(>KBQ^#;;[K8_$50`)7U<6/P;;?=;'X MAZN+'X-MONMC\15``E?5Q8_!MM]UL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q&U7ZS3K>HTNK5J6U M#IT5&T>>KBQ^#;;[K8_$;5 M!K-.K],14:-+:F07%N-H?:/*%FA:D*TG_,M25$1ET'[2,R,C&@`E?5Q8_!MM M]UL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q%4`"5]7%C\&VWW6Q^(>KBQ^#;;[K8_$50`)7U<6/P; M;?=;'XAZN+'X-MONMC\15``E?5Q8_!MM]UL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q%4,^)6:=+K M-0I,66T[4:>AIR4R@\FR3NHV]1^PC,D&>/;C!XPHLAB^KBQ^#;;[K8_$/5Q8 M_!MM]UL?B-"B712*W*7'ITAU;A(-ULW([K2)#9&1&XRM:22\WUD]=LU)ZZ#S MUDY^2%?-OS7(*8LUUUN8AE;3Y17M@G;)2II#CNC0VXHEMX;6I*CVB.CKIR&+ M:?)9:M.M6C0:O:UMRZE&A,LRI'HYIS:NI01+7J4C*LJ(SR?2>>D:OJXL?@VV M^ZV/Q&U$K-.EUFH4F++:=J-/0TY*90>39)W4;>H_81F2#/'MQ@\8466W%>6B-LW5M+6\I*#)ELEM.%M'#2D]FLR,R29D'EZN+'X-MO MNMC\0]7%C\&VWW6Q^(T)MSTV'7VJ*YSYRHK0TYHCP'WT-H<6I"%..(0:&R,T M+Z5&7[3,^CI&T`E?5Q8_!MM]UL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q%4`"5]7%C\&VWW6Q^(> MKBQ^#;;[K8_$50`)7U<6/P;;?=;'XAZN+'X-MONMC\15``E?5Q8_!MM]UL?B M'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q%4,^LUFG45N*NJ2VHR94IJ$P2SZ77G%$E"$D729F9__`+$1 MF>"(S(,7U<6/P;;?=;'XAZN+'X-MONMC\1H5NZ*11)2(]1D.H<-!.N&W'==1 M';,S(G'EH2:66^JKKN&E/46>>JK"K712*3*>BS)#O.VD-.KBQ^#;;[K8_$50`)7U M<6/P;;?=;'XAZN+'X-MONMC\15``E?5Q8_!MM]UL?B'JXL?@VV^ZV/Q&A&NJ MB2[=.NQ*@U(I.M;:9#)*63JTNFUI;(BRX9N%I222/69EIU9+*/=%(?IG/TR' M6V"E-0EI>CNM.MO.+0AM"VE)):#4;C9EJ2756E7[3(P$_6N36W%,0W*!;EOT M^HQJA"EHDM06VEI0U):<<)*DHR1FA"DE_7.#P1F8NABT2Z*16Y2X].D.K<)! MNMFY'=:1(;(R(W&5K227F^LGKMFI/70>>LG*/=5$DVO)N.-4&GZ)'0^XY+:) M2T:&5*2XI."RHB-"L&G.<9+)&0#:`8L:Z*1)K)TMF0Z4)4:BT+R1:%8\:%=U*KE5?IL$JDB:PRF0XW+IE6/VG@/EY2_=R'\:I/W&.*H2O*7[N0_C5)^XQQ5`)6\O>.Q/C3G MVZ8*H2'*`\<.?:%05&G/QH=66X_S.([*6VA4*4V2C0TE2L:EH+./\1#UW\I' M8[D^G*CX`"J`2N_E(['4N,Q,BO19C+3\9]"F MW6G4$I#B%%@TJ(^@R,C,C(Q-;^4CL=R?3E1\`-_*1V.Y/IRH^``^2W9;EM61 M59LZG5)Y3-3JCZ8L6*MV0\E<]]3>ALBR>HE),C]F#)1F2>D8MO1W:I5J!*3' MG<\55I=:J4B1`D16TF4549#*=JV@S-*)#"$JT))Q,=Q9X42B.EW\I'8[D^G* MCX`;^4CL=R?3E1\`!E0$;Q7PY(E0*D[3_1DF)+C5:#LFX:G%1R-AL]))?2YL MW#6HE/)(VTZ5)2O"_D9ILYVU(=,YE)1(DW:_)U+:426FFJJ[,VBSQE*5MLX2 MKXV702LE0;^4CL=R?3E1\`-_*1V.Y/IRH^``FJ-%EE6:'2U09R)--N.IU M22M<9Q+"8[W/MFI+QELUF?.6>HE1J+4>2+2K3JVK56KCO274GH=7B*C15Q(# M,VER8VEHW"-YTW%MI09NFEG#>5*2EHE=4UN(3H;^4CL=R?3E1\`-_*1V.Y/I MRH^``J@$KOY2.QW)].5'P`W\I'8[D^G*CX`"J`2N_E(['*G'Z5<#D:WD27HS#='DGSV43)D;C3F@F\);-YI!&O#BG3P1:6U+V]_* M1V.Y/IRH^`&_E(['E1&EPM*]-7)INRY3:3.C0M#2Z94.@F8I,1HW.(\QXHYM*B/NH)6R;-6DE.:FNA1&ATL+--AOY2.QW)].5'P`W\ MI'8[D^G*CX`"J`2N_E(['HR6I/1TF M2C+^8D4>E(C4]FI<_J&MAF7$IKTQ,+J]+ZTMH7G3DM*#+KJP70G4M+?R MD=CN3Z/*8U5KDF77. MMAJ3$Y]3(-.9?GMR*DF_H-;>T0I+3Z30YH4G69?NTJ(J#?RD=CN3Z8J$1_F_-# M.%*:2^TXIU%UU./2I*X2*+$>2U"C95)=2]/==0V18);IFX1F6%SB:S4Z=I6AK6XAKG\9;N# M(LDG#9*5_+"",_8&_E(['<:21&;B2;?P1)RI2VW$DDS(M5 M!OY2.QW)].5'P`W\I'8[D^G*CX`"*JD"14)#M;-BMQJ0[VD;#G6K;BS&6GXSZ%-NM.H)2'$*+!I41]!D9&9&1B:W\I'8 M[D^G*CX`;^4CL=R?3E1\`!\ENRW+:LBJS9U.J3RF:G5'TQ8L5;LAY*Y[ZF]# M9%D]1*29'[,&2C,D](Q;>CNU2K4"4F/.YXJK2ZU4I$B!(BMI,HJHR&4[5M!F M:42&$)5H23B8[BSPHE$=+OY2.QW)].5'P`W\I'8[D^G*CX`#*@(WBOAR1*@5 M)VG^C),27&JT'9-PU.*CD;#9Z22^ES9N&M1*>21MITJ2E>%_(S39SMJ0Z9S* M2B1)NU^3J6THDM--55V9M%GC*4K;9PE6,&IQLN@E9*@W\I'8[D^G*CX`;^4C ML=R?3E1\`!-4:++*LT.EJ@SD2:;<=3JDE:XSB6$QWN?;-27C+9K,^ GRAPHIC 10 graph3.jpg GRAPH begin 644 graph3.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#``8$!08%!`8&!08'!P8("A`*"@D) M"A0.#PP0%Q08&!<4%A8:'24?&ALC'!86("P@(R8G*2HI&1\M,"TH,"4H*2C_ MVP!#`0<'!PH("A,*"A,H&A8:*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H M*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"C_P``1"`$(`J@#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0` M'``!`0`#`0$!`0````````````4#!`8!!P((_\0`61````4"`08)"`8'!08" M"@,```$"`P0%$082%B$Q5)43%!5!59.4T=,'(E%35F'2U#(V<762LR,S-5*! MD;1"8G2AL20T0T9R@A+8BZ5I.['/F`XMB+I6D[L<^8%H`$7BV(NE:3NQSY@.+8BZ5I.[ M'/F!:`!%XMB+I6D[L<^8#BV(NE:3NQSY@6@`1>+8BZ5I.['/F`XMB+I6D[L< M^8%H`$7BV(NE:3NQSY@.+8BZ5I.['/F!:`!%XMB+I6D[L<^8#BV(NE:3NQSY M@6@`1>+8BZ5I.['/F`XMB+I6D[L<^8%H`$7BV(NE:3NQSY@.+8BZ5I.['/F! M:`!%XMB+I6D[L<^8#BV(NE:3NQSY@6@`1>+8BZ5I.['/F`XMB+I6D[L<^8%H M`$7BV(NE:3NQSY@.+8BZ5I.['/F!:`!%XMB+I6D[L<^8#BV(NE:3NQSY@6@` M1>+8BZ5I.['/F`XMB+I6D[L<^8%H`$7BV(NE:3NQSY@.+8BZ5I.['/F!:`!% MXMB+I6D[L<^8#BV(NE:3NQSY@657(M`XJCX^.I8D>HQX9Q!$?CDA,['D*U$>H!D9)F/<.LLO*B52+4'6)3$-YF$\AUQI M;SR64Y225H+*5IOZ#UZ@&_Q;$72M)W8Y\P'%L1=*TG=CGS`C8EQZU1*S+IR* M'6JDY#B(FR7(+;2D--K-9%?+<29G^B7H(CU"G'QA0'HT)XJO"1QR'R@PVXZE M#BX^3E<(2#L>21:3.VBQ@,W%L1=*TG=CGS`<6Q%TK2=V.?,#4P_CK#E=H2:M M"J\,HA1DRW>$>0E3#9F97<*_F:4J([\Z3+F&:7C3#$-U]N7B&D,.,+-#J7)C M:3;465@_P!T_0`R\6Q%TK2=V.?,!Q;$72M)W8Y\P-6NXPIU,P[% MK,0G:O%EOM1XQ4TVW3>6XK(3DF:B297/7<:U)Q[19M-ES)[QT7B`R<6Q%TK2=V.?,!Q;$72M)W8Y\P-?/G" MG"(1G+1LM9V27'6[J.ZBT:=.E"R_[3]`_;F-,+ML07G,14A+,XS**LYC9)?, MCL>0=_.TG;0`R\6Q%TK2=V.?,!Q;$72M)W8Y\P/8V*:!)K"J3'K=-=JB361Q M$24&Z1H,R461>^@TF1^BQC&C&&&ETR3448@I*J?%+8BZ5I.['/F`XMB+I6D[L<^8%H`$7BV(NE M:3NQSY@.+8BZ5I.['/F!:`!%XMB+I6D[L<^8#BV(NE:3NQSY@6@`1>+8BZ5I M.['/F`XMB+I6D[L<^8%H`$7BV(NE:3NQSY@.+8BZ5I.['/F!:`!%XMB+I6D[ ML<^8#BV(NE:3NQSY@6@`1>+8BZ5I.['/F`XMB+I6D[L<^8%H`$7BV(NE:3NQ MSY@.+8BZ5I.['/F!:`!%XMB+I6D[L<^8#BV(NE:3NQSY@6@`1>+8BZ5I.['/ MF`XMB+I6D[L<^8%H`$7BV(NE:3NQSY@.+8BZ5I.['/F!:`!%XMB+I6D[L<^8 M#BV(NE:3NQSY@6@`1>+8BZ5I.['/F`XMB+I6D[L<^8%H`$7BV(NE:3NQSY@. M+8BZ5I.['/F!:`!%XMB+I6D[L<^8#BV(NE:3NQSY@6@`51I# MAQ8[CY(.G.%E9*35:_#Z+V`;V-_J77_N^1^6H`##_P"U<2?>"/Z6.+0BX?\` MVKB3[P1_2QQ:``'Y<<0VA2W%$E"2N:E'8B+TBSDH>2I6G0?ZXK?8.Q`!\AB>3.L-.(J+L^C%5FI4%U#;,-3<8VXS;C9$9 M95\I1.J.^HLE)%H(:,#R1U=BJO2Y56A/&M]A64AMQ%T-36Y!612^3(QE`KU4F1'%H:8X=IKADI2\R@T$;:$K2C),K&9*2HRL9%H,? M6=`:`'Q%WR5XE3AYRDQ:Q1D-OT-JA/.*BN7X-I3IH6GSM"E$Y95]5KE?4.I9 M\GI(FQ'W%Q'":Q%(KCA&UI<2XVZE*3_O)-Q)W_N_8/HN@`'SI[R>\:P-`P[, M=CO,LU;CSQ*0>0ZT-5 MH;49V3/>4VIM:E1VC7 M5JC4)"V4>>I,II]LDD9ZU))Y.D_W1-G^2ZJU#"\.!,G4=$JGR67(QPX[L5#S M;;2FK.J;63ES):C\TRM8BTD9C["&@!-PU26J%AZFTF.9&U"CH8297TDDB+G, MSYN"/Z6.+0#5JD5,Z!)B.$DT/M*:5E%\,W6-OJW;W>\6C*Y#EJ`=?J=#IT]=5@MJE1VWS04`S))J22K?K/>`W\W6-O MJW;W>\,W6-OJW;W>\.)5[IB'V`_$'Y.)72,B.LPBOJ_V`_%`?K-UC;ZMV]WO M#-UC;ZMV]WO'Y7%KJ",U5F$1$5S,X!Z/_P`HT:;,EU0W"IF**/,-NV7Q>,3F M1?5?)=.VH_Y`*&;K&WU;M[O>&;K&WU;M[O>/SQ6ND5SK,(B+TP#\4:S;M1=D M)CM8CI:WU-$\EM,2ZC;/4LBX6^3[]0#;S=8V^K=O=[PS=8V^K=O=[QJ3W*E3 MF.'GXBID5BY)X1^)D)N>HKF[89F6:T\VAQFN07&UD2DK3!,R,CU&1\+J`9\,W6-OJW;W>\8B9K1NJ:*MP3<2DE*04$[D1WL9EPNH['_(QC:.J/ M27X[.(::Y(8MPK:8=U-WTEE%PMRO[P&SFZQM]6[>[WAFZQM]6[>[WC\\5KO3 M$/L!^*,+I59HW"=K].0;2.%<)4*V0C3YQ_I=!:#T^XP&QFZQM]6[>[WAFZQM M]6[>[WC`TFKNF@FZ]3U\(DUHR85\I.C27Z726DM/O&?B5>Z8A]@/Q`#-UC;Z MMV]WO#-UC;ZMV]WO#B5>Z8A]@/Q`XE7NF(?8#\0`S=8V^K=O=[PS=8V^K=O= M[QX<*O&7[8A=@/Q!^\.R9CRZG'GNM/.Q)7`I<;;-LE)-IM>DKGINLRU\P#\Y MNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN M]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5 MNWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM`` MBYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5N MWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL; M?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM M``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;? M5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9N ML;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN] MXM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL M;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X M9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NWN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]X9NL;?5NW MN]XM``BYNL;?5NWN]XQ4)I42O56&4B2\PVRPX@GW5.&DU&Y>QGI_LEH%\18' MUMK'^&B_ZN@&-_J77_N^1^6H`QO]2Z_]WR/RU``8?_:N)/O!']+'%H1(`MB+@CZF4#[OC_EI#-J#Z^K[VE>(/,#E;!=`+_P#CX_Y:0%"H MQ'I:$)CU"5!-)W-4=+1FKW'EH47\K#XSY5\(>4FIXJH4K"=5X:#2UE)2N6\R MVM3QW(]"6B(RR=&F_P!(Q]Q&K*J$6(]'9DR6679*^#90XLDFXJQG9)DUBH2+%YS#J6,BYEZ4-)/1[C(1JIA63.COL\92WPCLMU)I4J MR3=0:4&9%:YI,[Z>-QAR=&X(V%24FEPE&MI)74M)%I41%SD`YU M_#E2.C,LQBC1WFIQ2D1V9*FVV49)IR$.<&9EK-7T"UF7O$MW`]8-$=MJH-(0 MB(N.XI+BDK5E-K*V42K1>]AB# M)TC2A62I)DE6A5LD]"T'8CN1*+TBH`^;S<&U128IHX%]:GRRD*?63;+1-/ED ME_=)2VR*R=.0FY6(K5,082EU)N:MF6VB8Y3406WG",[G^E)S*+]U1++TF1E? MF':``DT:D)@3JG(R4?[2^2V[&?F(R2,T^Z[ANKT?OBL``````(N'_P!IXC^\ M$_TS`M#DZ=1HLZM8C>>=GI7Q])68GOLI_P!V8_LH61?QL`ZP!%S:@^OJ^]I7 MB!FU!]?5][2O$`6@$7-J#Z^K[VE>(&;4'U]7WM*\0!:`1TKQ`%H!%S:@^OJ^]I7B!FU!]?5][2O$`6@$7-J#Z^K[VE>(&;4'U]7W MM*\0!:`1TKQ`%H!%S:@^OJ^]I7B!FU!]?5][2O$` M6@$7-J#Z^K[VE>(&;4'U]7WM*\0!:`1TKQ`%H!%S M:@^OJ^]I7B!FU!]?5][2O$`6@$7-J#Z^K[VE>(&;4'U]7WM*\0!:`1TKQ`%H!%S:@^OJ^]I7B!FU!]?5][2O$`6@$7-J#Z^K[VE> M(&;4'U]7WM*\0!:`1TKQ`%H!%S:@^OJ^]I7B!FU! M]?5][2O$`6@$7-J#Z^K[VE>(&;4'U]7WM*\0!:`1 MTKQ`%H!%S:@^OJ^]I7B!FU!]?5][2O$`6@$7-J#Z^K[VE>(&;4'U]7WM*\0! M:`1(&;4'U]7WM*\0!: M`1TKQ`%H!%S:@^OJ^]I7B!FU!]?5][2O$`6@$7-J M#Z^K[VE>(&;4'U]7WM*\0!:`1TKQ`%H!%S:@^OJ^ M]I7B!FU!]?5][2O$`6@$7-J#Z^K[VE>(&;4'U]7WM*\0!:$6G_6VL?X:+_JZ M&;4'U]7WM*\0:N'X+4#$U9:87(6DV(RKOR''E:W?[2S,[:-5[`-K&_U+K_W? M(_+4`8W^I=?^[Y'Y:@`,/_M7$GW@C^ECBT(N'_VKB3[P1_2QQ:``&-]TF6UN M*)1I2DU&24FH]'H(M)G[BTB$C&%&42?]J<1?**SD9U!D:341I,C25E7;61)/ M2>2=B.P#/C?ZEU_[OD?EJ%HASN*)C,_`-DC(R,=$0`(N"/J70/N^/^6D6A%P1]2Z!]WQ_RT@-^HT]FH(0A]^QE]+G3X,E1V2;SA((S]US'SW%WEIP?A?$E/HLV8X^_+(C-Z* ME+K+!&=B-Q65]OT2,]&FV@!VT*AQH;9CHX1;662G&7$K2NV45B4:?.(CTZ-)6'0PZU3)CR68M2A/O M*ODH:?2I1V*^HC'.MXX1PC9/PC2E;Z6C)ITEN,$:'%GPJ+$:%))H\I.FVFQG M8`C8)-EA#)SB4@HB6%$32B);B4)1PAEEV+0DM1$O1;+L1$6"7Y/TRU$M^I.J M6J(N,L_/L:C)XB619=CMQA?T\M1V+SKW,[]"KS=7E2V66C24^HO>-56$G2F')9GH2XT M\MZ,2F,HD&MQ3BR61*++*ZSM;)L5KWUGF/&M(2AUQ;KR&6DFI3JF5$B_!\)D MD>J^3<[>[3S!&QK2I*F$QSDNF\2BW2CE&,>T21"5*C/N/-)R ME*X)LUF2$I2HUF1:DV6C\17MIME7C*FLLO./FZE#*'5+4AM2R(T)6HTEHN:L MEM2K6Y@'3`.:E8QIL=IA3AO(4]PB4)<0:#RT&9&@[\]RMHO;GL1D-:HXS9@U M"%'<:9),AJ.Z?"2,AP^&6:$DA&2>69&6G26LM8#K@'+N8WI#:GDJ6_ELK4AU M),F9H))&I2E$7T2(DJ/38]%K7L0RLXJBOP:A(80IPX,E<9Y*3N25I=-NQGJ( M[$2K:R)1>D@'1@.3FXZID>DR)J&Y3IMM&\ADF%$MQ&0M1*(K?1/@UZ?[I\UK MYU8UHQ2I<D!THBX?_`&GB/[P3_3," MUS"+A_\`:>(_O!/],P`M```````````````````````````````````````` M`````````````````````/"6DUF@E)RR(C--])$=['_D?\A(D8A@HD+CQ5JG M24&9*8B%PJDF6O*MH3_W&7H`6!^'76VFEN.K2AM!&I2E'8DD6LS/T"-EUR=] M%#%*8/\`?L^_;["\Q!_Q60R-8<@&XAZ:ERH24F2B=EK-RRBU&E)^:G_M(@&- M6(&I)D5'C2*@H]!.-IR&2/WN*LDR].3E&5M5[$?RWRQ43RIUVJT%>%D4V/'I MSI3*Y$E1K(LI))O_9(CRC_`(?;221:AZ`@1SQ,B.TIYNDR'#21K1E. M1\DS+25_TFKT\_N&0JZXQ_O](JL9/[Q-)D?Y-*6K_(6PL`EQ,0TF6^AABH1S MD*.Q,*7D.&?HR#LJ_P##F,4\HAAEPXTQA;,R.U(97H4VZ@EI5]I'K$O-FGM> M=`.3`<+Z*HKZD$7_`&7-!VYB-)D7,`M91#T?)_+--QEAW!SA8/DD7ZAWM#GQ!@?ZET"W1\?\`+2+8BEA+#A%8J!2" M+_!-_"`KN-H<(B<0E1%JRB(Q#JN#L/5:J0ZE4J/"DSH9I..^XT1J;,E916^P M](RYIX=Z`I'8V_A#-/#O0%([&W\("HB.TA1*0VVE1 M6L_,-9IN9F9G8W5Z]=_<5L>:>'>@*1V-OX0S3P[T!2.QM_"`G3\#TR1"9B1U M/Q8S9G=+;RU&I!D1&BYF=DV2GS=6@M&@ANN83H[G"9<0S)Q"T*3PSF29+)25 M';*ME66LLK61&9$8R9IX=Z`I'8V_A#-/#O0%([&W\(#'*PG1I3Y//Q#4LEFY M4\1+5YY\(IR^O]]:C_C;5H&/- M/#O0%([&W\(9IX=Z`I'8V_A`89F$*++C<7>BKX+@4Q_,D.(/@TDLB3E)41VL MZLCTZ25IOH'[=PK2'5/FY&4HGG%.K2;[F3EGE7,DY5DF9K4>BVD[Z](_>:>' M>@*1V-OX0S3P[T!2.QM_"`LWL0Y.FT2!4*UB-^4TM3G'TIN3RTZ"C,T._$&:])V=WM#OQ"T`"+FO2=G=[0[\09KTG9W>T._$ M+0`(N:])V=WM#OQ!FO2=G=[0[\0M``BYKTG9W>T._$&:])V=WM#OQ"T`"+FO M2=G=[0[\09KTG9W>T._$+0`(N:])V=WM#OQ!FO2=G=[0[\0M``BYKTG9W>T. M_$&:])V=WM#OQ"T`"+FO2=G=[0[\09KTG9W>T._$+0`(N:])V=WM#OQ!FO2= MG=[0[\0M``BYKTG9W>T._$&:])V=WM#OQ"T`"+FO2=G=[0[\09KTG9W>T._$ M+0`(N:])V=WM#OQ!FO2=G=[0[\0M``BYKTG9W>T._$&:])V=WM#OQ"T`"+FO M2=G=[0[\09KTG9W>T._$+0`(N:])V=WM#OQ!FO2=G=[0[\0M``BYKTG9W>T. M_$&:])V=WM#OQ"T%[`(N:])V=WM#OQ#2J5'H@?FG4];#JI,M[C M,U99*G&;32"(DH0\XDDD7,1$K0.@L7H`!% MS7I.SN]H=^(,UZ3L[O:'?B%H`$7->D[.[VAWX@S7I.SN]H=^(6@`1D[.[VAWXA:`!%S7I.SN]H=^(,UZ3L[O:'?B%H`$7->D[.[VAWX@S7 MI.SN]H=^(6@`1,UZ3L[O:'?B&FC`>&FYJIC=*:1,-.2;Z5K)RWHRKWL.G`!Q M7_AU3V-%.J%7C)UFVY,7)29^DS=-2]7,2B+1JUWTZM1CH%,E3YY4^5"BM*>= M<4^_%-"$E<[^G(< M-*K>^PZ]F,PR9FRRVV9Z\E)%S&=49FIR*1L+49^E2+&?\1^ M2HLIC13ZS4&4%_PWE)D),_29N$:_X91%[M8#]9KTG9W>T._$-7#\&/3\35EF M*A26S8C*L:U*TW=YS,_0-C)Q%'T)73)Z3T%E$N*I)%Z3+A"49_8DBM[]'S'R M<>5B'B3RQXCH#B&&5<$AF*M#N63RV#7PA$K02OI&9&1:DF8#ZAC?ZEU_[OD? MEJ`,;_4NO_=\C\M0`&'_`-JXD^\$?TL<6A%P_P#M7$GW@C^ECBT`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` M,G*<#;8O6I[QK5"OTJGPI$N54(K<=AM3KBS=*R4D5S,:M2:H,'(0]3X:Y#GZ MN.W'2IQS_I217^T]1-:.]!KA'3HCII,H]-)MM16._GN9)Y7V$ M1)TZC,B,!T>',6T7$-$AU6FSV%1)39.-FM9)47I(ROH,C(R,O20I\IP-MB]: MGO'!80\C>&,*4YR)32F+-;AN<.ZXDW-1%8S2DB416T$HCM<[:Q=.@R8)7;BT MFIM%_8?C(8=MZ(")6'V;)J ME*9ICNHREQ4)1?F_2%=L[Z-2N,94:EG_[MA=0GN`Z/2RUTV%U">X!^SJ<&W^^Q>M3WB7/Q M#%7(XE3Y<54RUU+4LC;9(_[2CO8S]"+W.Y:BTC7?@P:D^N+2H45I"%&EZ845 M%D&6@TMY23)2KZ#.QD5M.G0*4+#E(AQTLLTV'D)_>92HS,SN9F9E*P@W'77&4)2A)%\.4X& MVQ>M3WCF<%5S!>-X#TS#!4^X M!DY3@;;%ZU/>'*<#;8O6I[QCY&I?1L+J$]PX!DY3@;;%ZU/>(= M%9@.8NJ[T1N*HTL1[+:))V,S=OI(6.1J7T;"ZA/<)]'C,1<4UE$9EIE!QXQY M+:"25[NZ;$`RXVT8+K_W?(_+4`8W^I=?^[Y'Y:@`>4`R*J8E,S(B*>@S,_\` M"1Q:2HE%=)D9>DC'SS&!-*POC[AULH;XR@S-]Q*&_P#=HVA9J(TY)ZC(RL97 M+G&O_P"C^HE8%,DK:<)$E31+8<0MI1(;0@C0:$DFUDE>U_.RKG>Y$'TP!AFR M40XC\ATE&VRVIQ1(2:CL17.Q%I,_<.23CZ)D,FN!+2;A)N1*;5D+5PF2@[*U MGP2_<6B^L!9QO]2Z_P#=\C\M0M$.2Q768[_D[K?H]!% M8BYB(;Q%;4(N=-&VY/X%=P9TT;;D_@5W`+0"+G31MN3^!7<&=-&VY/X%=P"P M:$J(R41&1Z#(^<1W<.04&:Z>3M-=/6<)?!I,_2:/H*/WFD_1J#.FC;(O29WR%'Z=""UF7,0XCR;^4=CRJ/ M5J/3\NGQJ;(R%9#A&[):,SR%7MYA'95[7/58RUCM9>(*!+C/1Y,EIUAY!MN- MK:4:5I,K&1E;21D8CX?9P)AV2Y(H4&E4Y]Q'!KBBQ7JC_P#%27!L>X^$5H47 M_1E?Z7P3J"_78CL;$2XRZDT+;5Z#(_]2T'K(S+2-'.FC;+5)]MB5J2I M"5FT[K.Z%&DM-B.Z3TE8]9><=/.FC;ANDZV3$9.41&6F[OI^T!M8W^I=?^[Y'Y:@#&_U+K_W?(_+ M4`#AO*)Q;-[%G&DO%_YHUP;C9/&32SBL%EJX(R58B,]9VO:XV_(,A:<%N*5* M1*0J6LT.HD$\2BR4$=E$M>C*)5M)'DV,R29V&UB!+14[%K\F34F(T>H(>=*G M/)9=<241BZ26HRL6DC.QD9VM?38]_P`F$B@RL/..X5B/1Z:?96C26H!UCS2'FEMNIRD+2:5%Z2/6(1X1HREY2HBUKL=UKD.* M-1^=YRC-5S466JRCN97.QD.@`!SN*(;$'`-/1_H-7DARI'E8@4U(0>J$@C-A/_`%$?ZP_>HKF/F_3J5`B/&G)-QB.AM1EZ+D1:-0_50HE,J+B7)T", M^Z@K(<6V1K07]U6LOX&`W[D?./2.XB9N,-::?-J,(]5FI*EIMZ"0YE)3_`B, M?DHU=B_[O4(LU'[LMC(7?_K;,BM[LB^O2`N@(?*E5C:)M%4Z7[\"0ETB+^\3 MG!G?W))0YJI>52C4_&U,PS(CSD5&:RMPFU,&2DK(RR$6U'E%EV,C,M&DRTV# MZ"/#,BUB+Q^LRO.A4MJ.U^]/?R5G[R0@E:/M41Z]'IL>@VH+91 MT&7HN9J61^\E$?HL`J3)L6#'4_-DLQV$V(W'EDA)7T%I/0)1XCBO'DTQF745 M'LS)Y'6*LCT:,J_N&Q"H%,AOID-14KDIO9]Y1NN%?7YZS-6GGTZ13))%:P#X M_P"6"=Y2WX]*9P30#27&$R7W4RFE.I2@R-+:DJLDKGKL:M!:RN/IM!@MQXJ) M"F'6YDE"5R%/J);QJM?)4KW&9Z"\TM-B(A4```````````````````````!C MD/(CM+=>6AMI"34I:SL22+69GS$`R!`3SN3WB1^%*,LS_B: M>:QGS?-?*3Y(JSCS%-%K,O%)T_D_)(F(;"D\&1+RLMM1K/\`2:;95B^BG1H' MV8M``(A4-^W[E0MH5E%I2CF+'/3DH6:2,B,LO)/),R.U[ M#:\B;\V1A-Y=50XW-*4:'DNM.(7EI;;(U*-QMM2C49&JYI_M6N=AIX_GLP,+ M8XX?(,Y$Q+#:%H)9+6J)'L7G$:2.Q'8S(R(RO8]1Y/('P&9"TQ4NI:3+<*SJ M&4JODI/_`(24I/[3*_OM8!]#FR6X<1^2^9DTRVIQ9D5[)(KGH'S]CRBJD,,O M1X+*FUK-D[2&&&&&&&&&+5@ ML`BYRP?45;=,KPPSE@^HJVZ97ABU8+`(N)8-OU%6W3*\,&+6@`$7.6#ZBK;IE>&&&&D])V.Q' MJ&#DN54CRZXZ7`\T*.HR;+_K5H4Y]FA.GZ)F1&`FRLX:E(-:: M=()ILTZ\M7!F9'[B(S]UKF6%B7">=0_6#J\]U"B6ALZ-*0RVKTI;X,[G?4:C M49HJV MZ97ABU8+`(N&+0:`$7.6#ZBK;IE>&&&&:E6DM-M8"@>)H%_U%7W3*\,:DG'%%CR$QG.4N-K2:VXY4R3PCA$1GYJ> M#N>H_P"0V>3*A..]6J"DLGKBPB-I!EZ%.:5JL?.DT7MI*QF0I4ZF0J:VI$&* MTP2CREFA-C6?[RCUJ/WGI`+Y4]7^Q4RI0&=7"SJ5*6L_>32$:OM6D]>C1 MI&JD22O64UNJJU9,JDR3:(O1P26B0>GG,C/WZ"MV]B"P#C*`6%\/Q7(U&HLR M$PXZI]:&J-*(C6H[F?ZO_P#PB(BT$0J5X0OV"P#B>`P>9F:L-7O M_P#UU[P1[P.$"TMX==:5S+:H$AM1?8I+1&7\#':V"P#BLC#71]:[!.^$"/Z6.+0``P3'39CNN$IM.0@U7=5DI*Q7TGS%Z3'S]S'509>-I MQB*I:%DPNURNI7#&2R(E&1)+@BN1&=\KZ16L`ZW&_P!2Z_\`=\C\M0M$.,Q# M5S?\FM;DRD*4YQ>9&,X[2EDHT<(WED17,DGDY7/8CU\XL%B2)LM6W9(^`!;` M12E7ZLK7*YD9F1Z,G6,7DKP(SY/,.N4:'4I M4^(;RGF^,)21MFHBNDLGFN5_M,Q%\H.+I=0PG68>!$5-S$)(2AI:*>\265&9 M7NHTD1*R2/1I,C-)F5C$7R4U+'3&$FV\:RIB*F;RU$2Z,^^ZE&BQ*6FR/3J+ M5;3K`?9AXH[#B^-J=+_:JIBA9*TJ;:I2FD?81I9RR+_OOZ3,?DRI"_U[>*'_ M`$\(B?8R]!I*R3+[2`=A(F1XQI*0^TR:M7"+)-_LN),C%E&:2YP,YJ8\W?*8 MA'QAW1K\Q%S+T7/1R=-[Z](#M@'$9T5*%^MI\^J->F/39##I>[)6DTJ^W*3] M@V\_*,U,3$DIJ<>4I)&EIZG/I-6BYDDS191D6O),[`.L`1,Y8>RU;=DCX![G M)$V6K;LD?``M`(AXFA$1F<:K$1:3/DV1\`EN8]IKO#IID*LU%YHR)3<>G/6( MS.WTE))-RYROUPLZ0S':O;+=622,_05]9CDRKL^>5Y":G3& M3_X<:EONO?Q<4WDE?T$D_5RN^4M^HT;_PQ@/E3U&:)+KT=LC6LS*UTNEE)01%]*Q%YQ^C1]+:GU[@D M<+1(_"9)963-*U^>WFZA^LY(>R5;=DCX![G)$V2K[LD?``/T?_`&B!C?RET?">&Y57DL5%]#&21-%#=;-9 MFHBME+222U\YB_G)$V2K[LD?`,$ZL4J?$=BSJ94),5Y)H<9>I+ZT+2>LC2:+ M&7V@(F`_*?1L88;CU>-'J,=+JEH-I4-UPT&E1E])"32?,>@^<=$6(XQZ40ZJ MI/,HJ>]8_P#[1K0*O2:=#:B4^EU"+%:+);98I#Z$(+T$DF[$-G.2)LE6W9(^ M``Y>6Y_N=&J\FWTOT*6,GT?KE(O_``O[[:+^'6*@K0C#M12H]1NO1B07VFEU M1_R(Q[G)$V2K[LD?`/,Y(>R5;=DCX`&M/GXA5"D<2HT8I?!JX$W)I&G+L>3? MS=5[#@?(VGRE5B+5$>4IYR(RAU*&"0VTTZZ5CRBN@M"-7G%8SN=C(?1\Y(>R M5;=DCX`SDA[)5MV2/@`4H,&-`8)F&RVRT1WR4)M<_2?I/WC9$7.2)LM7W9(^ M`,Y(FRU?=DCX`%H!%SDB;+5]V2/@'F@7I6,9)R'&H.'ZP9).Q/R8CK;:O>D MDH4H_L-*>;[2#L1K39\6"R;LV0S':+6MU9(3_,QR7*,F3^T)U:0CG;@49]DE M%[U*2M7X33SZ^;/!>H4-\GVZ34URMI>IDAUX_M<4@U'[M.CF`5,X42-%)A3* MCZ'&D$AJW[Q.+-*5)U:4Y5R.Y$8^=>5##'E#Q34\/2,/5>/0XT222W6FGC6: M=?Z57FIR[%YO!Z2.^O6/HNDA4@PX\"*S%ALML1F4$VVTVDDI0DBL1$1:BL)F91$=M.L!M8W^I= M?^[Y'Y:@#&_U+K_W?(_+4`!A_P#:N)/O!']+'%H13DE8B-5KWL0#Z*M1)3OW+TI]&4(%/K$3$5&IM6FK6_%J#27X=+C&;I.),B,N$L191Z;'E&3 M:>>]LH741*C4B+CBUTV)S1XSGZ51>A;A?1^Q!W_ORJ745_I M%M-F2G5G^^XHS(BU:U&6JQ7,B(?HJ=-J9WK+R6XY_P#L451DE7N<7H-9>XB2 M1Z2,E$*E/@QJ>QP,-AMEN^4:4)M<_2?I/WC9`8H\9F,RAF.TAII!62A"22DO ML(AE'AJ(M8_++K;[:7&5I6VHKI4D[D9>XP'[`````#```CN/#61:]`#T8I$9 MF2PIF2TAYE5LI#B24D^?21B=*Q'28SZV%SFER$'93+-W7$GS$:4W,C/F*VD8 M55F9(+_RZC2W$G]%V491T'[S([N$6O6B_N,!Z>'F8Y7I,J53K:4MLKRF2]W! M*NDB].22>?3?2/DU5Q#Y3HOEMIV'F3IQT*2CA4K-I!)<:2FRW+&K+RDJ/Z)' MIL7,8^L$Q7Y16=E0(#:OI)CMJ?<27]U:LE-_>:#+W#B*MY&:;5?*+3L6S*Q5 MW945'GH.1DFXLOH&2D9)MD5U72BQ'HU:;AVZ:"B2HE5B3(GJ/2;:E&AC[."+ M09>C*RCT:[Z1898:9:2VRA+;:2LE*2(B(O01$)/(!EH35ZNE):BXP1V_B9&9 M_P`0Y!5TQ5^O+X0%H!$.A/)TLURK-J].6TO1]BT&7^0]Y&G>TE6ZN+X("T9D M6L[`/DWE<\G>)\4Q*.W0\8SHZHLQ+SI/DV@K7*RTFTA)FI%C,B/0=^8=XU1* M@EI"5XFJRU$DB-7!12N?I_4@+H"+R+-/Z6(ZL9^3U_`6&(U*HE:>>X.ZG4S6R<96L]*C2DK*1IU%E&1%>Y&9W'1E4*K$ M5DSJ4(:7+D)CM2T)E*O:.\1M.G;2?F M+(E?Y"H1D8#T````:M0G1H#!NS'4M(ODE?2:C/422+29GS$5S,3"K2E'V%E';4HCU;]-I46GJ6MAN[SGZQ]PS6ZY_ MU+/2?V:BU%8AO`.@=&1`````````````````````````````````(E/+_UMK'^&B_ZNBV(L#ZV MUC_#1?\`5T`QO]2Z_P#=\C\M0!C?ZEU_[OD?EJ``P_\`M7$GW@C^ECBT(N'_ M`-JXD^\$?TL<6@&"N&II422X_'6 M5VU*CIRU-'PV4XNR;$M&0WH*Q%EZ2,ST?3C3\F-8?<9=EN*BR MVR4DDH4MHN$2AT[V+2@DJ.VN^@N86RJ]2]G:AUT?Q![C;ZEU_P"[Y'Y:A:(! M%Y7J7L[4.NC^('*]2]G:AUT?Q!:`!%Y7J7L[4.NC^('*]2]G:AUT?Q!:`!%Y M7J7L[4.NC^('*]2]G:AUT?Q!:`!%Y7J7L[4.NC^('*]2]G:AUT?Q!:`!%Y7J M7L[4.NC^('*]2]G:AUT?Q!:'XX1/"&V2B-9$2C3?21'>Q_Y'_(P$CE>I>SM0 MZZ/X@?7:=`>X&5+:3(,KDRD\MU7HL@KJ._,1%I&MRI49FB MFTM;:?73U\"DR_NH*ZS/W*)/VWT`/>6*C[.U#KH_B#4J6*7::TER?1Y4=*SR M4\))C%E'Z"+A=)^XALII4^9IJE5=))ZV()<`BWHR[FY?WDI-_00W*?1:?37% MNPXC3;RRR5.Y-UJ+T&H])E_$!\@Q-Y=V*/CRB4%RCSXZ9)GQDY)-MJLLK-&F MZM!&O6:LG18RN1CNN6,:._\`+3,3F_WEN1;W_3;O]G^8S5SRAX6HF*HF':K5 M6H]5DIRT-K2>2DC/1E*M9-]-KGS#=FXM@LL\)%)4EN^23]R:CDH]5W5V2?/? M)-1E;5>Q&$S+Q(_IF-5A*CUHAE#:;_AE+6LOQ##*:8C1ER*Q1*J\RC2MR?4V ME-$>K*R5/9"3TVT$6NQ:QF57BF*,GZ_!C$>IBEEQEU1^@EFD\KT62W>Y:^89 M8ATMF0B5'HU7G24:I4F,X;B56TV-ZRBT'_9*VFW-8@U*)7$(6XUA[!<]"%D9 MJ?:1'994HBT77EEE;;9-EXC,RMYR MS>3>Q7M9)?\`Z'UDJC5WCM$H2F3+2KC\M#9'_P!/!<*9G]I$.+\K5/\`*%6L M'R8V%9%/@3%64I##RS=<3SH0X9)))^^Q7M;0`IX$I2L'8;ATJ#AN;>.$V\\VHEI= MD&;RR41W)64LS._OU@(2L?M*.T6CU&:?_P`D;4G^?!K5;[3T#9/$.('Z>EZ% M@^>F0:K<#-EQVK%Z;H6O^7^@ZK)(M0_0#YSB%C%N(:),ILIB;3&Y+1M\)3>` M2\C['%O&5CYR))';49:QS_DIP;7\$8/8I+CF(77TN*=,V7HAM-FJWFH2M1^; MHOIYS,Q]F`!Q5L1>G$?\Z=W!;$7IQ'_.G=P[4`'%<9Q,^ZWKRID>.MS M^;3^C^5*GUZOOXJFSGZ?+>X1EN(N,:K^ MDLM1DVG)L62F^DM>BY]VF!PAY4_#56J"^=4R6RZ7\$F[DIOSDDB(^<=L`#GX MTV5%80S%PO,9905DMMN1DI27N(G+$,O*M1+_`)'*AUT?Q![RO4?9VH=='\06@`1>5ZE[.U#KH M_B!RO4O9VH=='\06@`1>5ZE[.U#KH_B!RO4O9VH=='\06@`1>5ZE[.U#KH_B M#SE:H^SE0ZZ/X@M@`YV9+D38ZF)F%9CC/)]Y5<1XZ=J\>%A*7$3"E+97(4M!<$G01(-*S(C>+3 MY)$7NN9BD56J)?\`+E0ZZ/X@M@`B\KU+V=J'71_$#E>I>SM0ZZ/X@M``B\KU M+V=J'71_$#E>I>SM0ZZ/X@M``B\KU+V=J'71_$#E>I>SM0ZZ/X@M``B\KU+V M=J'71_$#E>I>SM0ZZ/X@M``B\KU+V=J'71_$#E>I>SM0ZZ/X@M``B\KU+V=J M'71_$#E>I>SM0ZZ/X@M``B\KU+V=J'71_$#E>I>SM0ZZ/X@M``B\KU+V=J'7 M1_$#E>I>SM0ZZ/X@M``B\KU+V=J'71_$#E>I>SM0ZZ/X@M``B\KU+V=J'71_ M$#E>I>SM0ZZ/X@M``B\KU+V=J'71_$#E>I>SM0ZZ/X@M``B\KU+V=J'71_$& MKA^0])Q-65R8;T-?`1BX-U2%&97=T^8HR_SYAT@BP/K;6/\`#1?]70#&_P!2 MZ_\`=\C\M0!C?ZEU_P"[Y'Y:@`,/_M7$GW@C^ECBT(N'_P!JXD^\$?TL<6@` M>91#\/\`"&VM+*DI<-)Y*E)RB(^8S*Y7^RY#YU)J>*6V*62>/F\N$RJ1DP2, MC4:'>%4?F>:M*DM63H^D?FGS!U^-_J77_N^1^6H6B,?%O+;BC$-#\C;TF`67 M,E2'(:UR6V6ZLD%?T7/ M[#'S&72_*3+CK,K*D-SRX=1>@W%Q%&>HM=]7V`/HZL2P'2_V`I-0+]Z&PIQ'6$61?W7 MOIU#0K]./A_D>\F.*\(8:>9J>&\+5"2](4Z;,Y5W"*Q) M(N&2E9$6B]B2?\+Z.\.C8@+]7Y/\%M++4MFJ+;6GWDI,4C(_>1@.T*F56W[? MD=F9^$>\F57I^1V9GX1R].H]84E?*6&X#2[^:3%?D.$9>\S;38;O(DGH%K?3 MWP@+)TFI*_68AG$7-P3+"3_S08^487I(_-,=3,CU1B2MIK`LR2A)Z'6JZ1)5HYLI9'_`#(A M\3P)09L_R_8JD/X%NMEAQ;<>H2%\`T[=)$I;ADLEY1&>HE%IN16+0']*QZGA MJC).-'F4R-YQW::6@E&KGN1:35?^)F,50Q?"AMI<5%GY"M"5/-%&(SYR+AS0 M),6!BDVR0_'A16;$1QJ=()A.3^[E&T:]6C*2:#YRL*$"#-@.F[&P[`XP>@WW M*@IQTR]!K4V:C_F`U,X\15`[46A-9"_H/R7E);21ZE'YI96C]PU$?,JVD;4* MEXME+4NLX@B1D:")FE0R3J.]S6Z:]>JV3_$4>-UWH:'V\_#'ZXY7NAX?;S\, M!PU<\B&&*UBZEXAG*GNS8IDJ0;LE:SEJ21$@UF9^;8R([)L7-:P[Z!AZCP'N M%ATJ`P[:W"-QT)7;GTD5QBX[7NAX?;S\,..U[H>'V\_#`64I))$22(B+F(A[ M81>.U[H>'V\_##CM>Z'A]O/PP%H+$(O':]T/#[>?AAQVO=#P^WGX8"T`B\=K MW0\/MY^&'':]T/#[>?A@+0"+QVO=#P^WGX8<=KW0\/MY^&`M`(O':]T/#[>? MAAQVO=#P^WGX8"T`B\=KW0\/MY^&'':]T/#[>?A@+0"+QVO=#P^WGX8<=KW0 M\/MY^&`M`(O':]T/#[>?AAQVO=#P^WGX8"T`B\=KW0\/MY^&'':]T/#[>?A@ M+0"+QVO=#P^WGX8<=KW0\/MY^&`M`(O':]T/#[>?AAQVO=#P^WGX8"T`B\=K MW0\/MY^&'':]T/#[>?A@+0"+QVO=#P^WGX8<=KW0\/MY^&`M`(O':]T/#[>? MAAQVO=#P^WGX8"T`B\=KW0\/MY^&'':]T/#[>?A@+0"+QVO=#P^WGX8<=KW0 M\/MY^&`M`(O':]T/#[>?AAQVO=#P^WGX8"T`B\=KW0\/MY^&'':]T/#[>?A@ M+0"+QVO=#P^WGX8<=KW0\/MY^&`M`(O':]T/#[>?AAQVO=#P^WGX8"T`B\=K MW0\/MY^&'':]T/#[>?A@+0"+QVO=#P^WGX8<=KW0\/MY^&`M`(O':]T/#[>? MAAQVO=#P^WGX8"T`B\=KW0\/MY^&'':]T/#[>?A@+0"+QVO=#P^WGX8<=KW0 M\/MY^&`M`(O':]T/#[>?AAQVO=#P^WGX8"T`B\=KW0\/MY^&'':]T/#[>?A@ M+0"+QVO=#P^WGX8<=KW0\/MY^&`M`(O':]T/#[>?AAQVO=#P^WGX8"T`B\=K MW0\/MY^&'':]T/#[>?A@+0BP/K;6/\-%_P!70X[7NAX?;S\,:N'W9;N)JRJ? M&;CN\!&+(;=X0K7=TWR2]^BP#:QO]2Z_]WR/RU`&-_J77_N^1^6H`##_`.U< M2?>"/Z6.+0BX?_:N)/O!']+'%H````1<;_4NO_=\C\M0M$(N-_J77_N^1^6H M6B`````````````````S(M8````````!<```````N0`````````!'?4````` M````$9'J```````#,B`````````+@`````````7(```````N`````````$9& M```````&=M8`````````9VU@`````````$9&`````"+`^MM8_P`-%_U=%H18 M'UMK'^&B_P"KH!C?ZEU_[OD?EJ`,;_4NO_=\C\M0`&'_`-JXD^\$?TL<6A%P M_P#M7$GW@C^ECBT`";B0Y1464<#+XQDE;@RNJURO;WVO:VGT"D/%_1/1&6RX60XTY9*;\)D+(C2DKI+3I,ST6YPK\9Q%T52-YN?+AQG$715(WFY\ MN+1``B\9Q%T52-YN?+CPY.(K?LJD;S<\`6QQ]>Q1,IRZB10T9,9U"4J\YTS0 M;:UY60DKF=T6L5[$>4>@C(@VJ7.Q2[%4J32*4ASA7$V.H.)\TEJ))VX`]:2( M[\^O1J+U[9)F5A]#+4`B\9Q%T52-YN?+AQG$715(WFY\N+0`(O&<1=%4C>;GRXTD MSL4'57VETBE<62RVI"N4'+&LU.9197`:;$2=%BM?6=]&UB&KR:7(B)9B(?0] MPI&:GB1YR6EN)25]!7R+&9V(O].6+R@/LR5)DPEK9:4:%J:C/)6X>0I>A*BN MBQ)(K+^E?S3T&`ZSC.(NBJ1O-SY<.,XBZ*I&\W/EQ^\)U8ZY0HM14A+:GB5= M"3,R29*-)D1F1&>DO00K@(O&<1=%4C>;GRX<9Q%T52-YN?+BT)6(9[],@HD1 MV$O&;[32B4O))*5N)2:N>]KZO3;5K`3I4[%"9\1#=(I1M+RN$450<,DV*Y:> M!T:?<8W.,XBZ*I&\W/EQRE5QY,@R:HV<%*BA9;ER;<5="5.D1%8M)JX*^45R M1E65I(QTV%JO)JBYB9S2([K:B6VRDR49-*-60HU)4I)W))ZCT6/1:QF&7C.( MNBJ1O-SY<.,XBZ*I&\W/EQ:`!%XSB+HJD;S<^7&E5IV*&:=*=B4BE+DH:4IM M)5!Q9FHBT%;@"O\`99-1 MH2I2BR[N%;+M9)%P9:56RLK1J,!TW&<1=%4C>;GRX<9Q%T52-YN?+CG\,8RD MUBK-Q78I-,<(Y'-Y2%(RW4FYJ2KSDW2V9V4G_NO8C[I.H@$7C.(NBJ1O-SY< M.,XBZ*I&\W/EQ:'BB,RT`(IR<1=%4C>;GRXU*3.Q0]3H[LJD4I#ZT$:TG4'$ M6/G*W`';[+F)]?Q=,I46K/*@HR8,M;-B-3AK;3'0Z1V25R-65:^DDZ#/G&.+ MBNI3*@B&Q'C-O&\T1I<0Y]!9KRB)6@E9*6EGEINE1F1%8!T'&<1=%4C>;GRX M<9Q%T52-YN?+BT6H`$7C.(NBJ1O-SY<><9Q%T52=YN?+BV.;Q!7)=.J"X[45 M"T'&-U#AJ,SOPC:#\PBN9$3E[%YRC+)(KF5P_,&=BA_`'?SC45]&JUM%SW.,XBZ*I&\W/EQQR?*#-=6EMJGI-UU1M,D;:RR ME$I"34>58BN:SLVHTJ*US.QD8[^BS.4:-`G&DD\9CMO9)';GRXM``B\9Q%T52-YN?+C3>G8H*J1VDTBE''4RZI:B MJ#AD2B4V22OP.BY*7HL=[:RMIHX@J#U-8C.L,)=)R4Q'7E+R;GRX<9Q%T52-YN?+BT-:IO*C4^0\A;+9MH-66^HR0@BUJ49 M`.9+&=2-Y+*H<9I;DA,-!K-7TC)HR=,M9),G2/)UE:QF*6#\4OUUV*; ML=IIJ5&6^@DJ,U(-'!$HE>F_"E;5;)Y[@*G&<1=%4C>;GRX<9Q%T52-YN?+B MT`"+QG$715(WFY\N'&<1=%4C>;GRXM*U#B)^*YT2H2F.`B.M1VG)!O(4K)43 M:DI6R7I666D\K5K*UR.P4*1.Q0]3(CLND4I$E;*%.I.H.(-*S21F63P!VT\U MS^TQN\9Q%T52-YN?+B)0L63*@]3$.PV$MS'4D:TN'^C)<93Z4VYST6,]!>X= MHG4`C<9Q%T52-YN?+AQG$715(WFY\N+0\5]$P$;C.(NBJ1O-SY<:=.G8H(DD5M7/J` M=-QG$715(WFY\N'&<1=%4C>;GRXJ0W''8C#C[7`NK0E2VS42L@S+2FY:#MJN M,P"+QG$715(WFY\N/.,XBZ*I.\W/EQ;'/XMK,BBLM/1VF'RTFI@U&3BTE;*- M/,1)*ZC,_01:S(!A9G8H.J2&E4BE%&2RTI"CJ#A$:C4X2BOP.FQ)1HL5KZSO MHW.,XBZ*I&\W/EQS;6,9W'Y<5QF"1PU,(==4M2$+-Y!J29:\DDV\Z][ZRL.H MPU4'JG3$R)3:6GR=<:6A.HC0LTGSGZ/2?VF`Q\9Q%T52-YN?+AQG$715(WFY M\N+0`(O&<1=%4C>;GRXTY\[%#;L)+-(I2D./9+IE4'%9*78BT6MS@.D*3B*W[*I.\W/EQ[QG$715(WFY\N)N#<7)Q M+.E-(BJC(9CQWTY9GE*X3+RM9%H(T6(^?7J,AU@"+QG$715(WFY\N'&<1=%4 MC>;GRXM#QPS)M1I(C41'8C.Q7^T!S57G8H9I`.7G8XG0H\]]<:*^Q";0YEMJ412B7EDDV M[ZB2IM1&9WRM96(R%*CXEG2J^S`E,1VV,MQ@WT'E$ZZGA#R4EE922R6\JZB, MCTE>^L*_&<1=%4C>;GRX<9Q%T52-YN?+BT`"+QG$715(WFY\N'&<1=%4C>;G MRXM'J')U6O3XU<13XR(:TO&2$NFI1\`JQ&7"$5KFHB58BU9)&9Z2`9J9.Q0Z MPM4FD4I#A/.I(CJ#B;I)Q1).W`GK21'?GUV*]BW.,XBZ*I&\W/EQQ9>468Y` MI\QJG-9$_+6A.7; MGRX<9Q%T52-YN?+BT`"+QG$715(WFY\N,-!1455ZJR*E$9C\(RPA'`/*=0K) M-R_G&A.G3JMZ-(QXQKLFA,\/'98D$AEQTXYJ,G'"25U&7,E*2L9F=[W(BL9E M>*6,9J9KT9U,%HHZULNOGE&G*)#R\LBO]$B8,C*]_.UZ`'28W^I=?^[Y'Y:@ M&E7'9;_DUJCM2:0S,SL_KX_B#PZK4C_Y=G]?' M\0``:YR)"G&G%85DFXRI2FU&Y&N@U?2,CX309W.]M8P,H)EUAUG!BVW&$Y+2 MT<5(VRTW))DO06D]7I,``4.5JE[.S^OC^('*U2]G9_7Q_$``#E:I>SL_KX_B M#7DR9$I"T2<*R7D+,C4EQR,HE&6J]W--N8``8U+<4I2E81>-2G">49JC&9N% MJ6?G_2+TZQN:-@E):R%1D\&2M)DFR]%^>P``V6 MZE/:226\-S4I+F2]'(OS!^^5JE[.S^OC^(``'*U2]G9_7Q_$'Y M%XMA>4UPJS<7D.1DY:SUJ.SFDS](``S MSL_KX_B``#7?DR)!&3^%9+A99.>>Y&/SRM96ES65BT^X&9,AA2E,X5DMJ6X; MJC0Y&(S696-1_I-9ESZP`!GY6J7L[/Z^/X@]Y6J7L[/Z^/X@``SL_KX M_B``#\.5*>X1$YAN:HB,E6-Z.>DCN1_K-9&-;+AS68S\K5+V=G]?'\0``.5JE[.S M^OC^(,4F=,E,+8DX8EO,K*RFW'8ZDJ+WD;FD``:J4$ELT)P8HD&WP)I+BMC1 M>^3;+^C?3;4,[$J2P\X\SA:2VZX24K6AR,2E$G01&9.:;*D?"%>R_I_2 M*YZ=>DP`!G9D2&"LQA62V7"&[9#D8O//6K0YK.YZ?>-@JM4B_P"79_7Q_$`` M'O*U2]G9_7Q_$'AU:I'_`,NS^OC^(``-%\N'?<>?P22R7Q4\K)^C>Z]-N;T``#=;J=0;0E",-S4H25B23T M4TMQ<92F MST'=)FYHU%J]```_#9J:)HF\'N()DE$WDG%+()7TB3Y^B_/;6,\:=,BLH9C8 M8ELM(*R4-NQTI27N(G``!FY6J7L[/Z^/X@YD5[%?A/>?\Q^^5JE[.S^OC^(``'*U2]G9_7Q_$ M'Y75*BM"DKPY.4E16,C>CF1EU@``T8Z"C\'Q?!JVN#RC1D<53DY165:R]%R( MB/TV&6.Z[&6TN/A)YI;2#;;-"HR30DSN:2LO07N``&WRM4O9V?U\?Q`Y6J7L M[/Z^/X@``\Y6J7L[/Z^/X@T7DD\Z^Z]@U;CCZ\K5+ MV=G]?'\0.5JE[.S^OC^(``-62Z[*DM2).$GGGVBLVXXJ,I2/L,UW(?A!J;)! M-X/=22&S:223BEDH/6DO/T$?H``'XQ!(JM2H%3@,X?F(=E1G6$J6^QDD:D&D )C.SFK2```__9 ` end -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----