XML 30 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
General
General

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  These financial statements and accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (2015 Form 10-K), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Form 10-K and updated, as necessary, in Note 3 in this Form 10-Q. The results of the Company’s operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for any other interim period or full year.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts Receivable
               
Accounts receivable arising from product sales represent amounts due from physicians. We provide reserves against trade receivables for estimated losses that may result from a customer’s inability to pay. Amounts determined to be uncollectible are charged or written-off against a reserve.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-Based Compensation

The Company follows Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718, Compensation Stock Compensation (ASC 718), or ASC 505-50, Equity Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees, where applicable. The Company accounts for stock-based awards to employees using the fair value based method to determine compensation for all arrangements where shares of stock or equity instruments are issued for compensation. In addition, the Company accounts for stock-based compensation to non-employees in accordance with the accounting guidance for equity instruments that are issued to entities or persons other than employees. The Company uses a Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of each option grant as of the date of grant for expense incurred. The Black- Scholes model requires inputs for risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, expected stock price volatility and expected term of the options. The value of the award that is ultimately expected to vest based on the achievement of a performance condition (i.e., service period) is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. See Note 7 for additional details.

Previously, ASC 718 required forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differed from those estimates. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-09 which allows an entity to elect as an accounting policy either to continue to estimate the total number of awards for which the requisite service period will not be rendered or to account for forfeitures when they occur. In connection with the adoption of this ASU, the Company made an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. See “Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements” below for additional details.
Income Taxes
Income Taxes
    
In accordance with ASC 270, Interim Reporting, and ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company is required at the end of each interim period to determine the best estimate of its annual effective tax rate and then apply that rate in providing for income taxes on a current year-to-date (interim period) basis.  For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded no tax expense or benefit due to the expected current year loss and its historical losses.  The Company had not recorded its net deferred tax asset as of either March 31, 2016 or December 31, 2015 because it maintained a full valuation allowance against all deferred tax assets as management has determined that it is not more likely than not that the Company will realize these future tax benefits.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Amendments to ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606)

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). In April 2016, the FASB also issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. These amendments include targeted improvements based on input the FASB received from the FASB/International Accounting Standards Boards’ Joint Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition and other stakeholders, but do not change the core principles in Topic 606. The ASUs seek to clarify the guidance within the applicable subtopics of ASC 606, including amendments to the implementation guidance and illustrations intended to improve the operability and understandability of the implementation guidance. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. Management is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Amendments to ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This update simplifies several aspects of accounting for share-based payment award transactions and includes accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, statutory tax withholding requirements and the classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, as well as the classification on the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for public companies with annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2016-09 during the three months ended March 31, 2016. In connection with the adoption of this ASU, the Company elected to account for forfeitures as they occur and applied this change in accounting policy on a modified retrospective basis. As a result, the Company recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings which resulted in an increase to accumulated deficit of $0.1 million with an offsetting increase to additional paid-in capital (zero net total equity impact) as of the date of adoption, principally related to additional stock compensation expense that would have been recognized on unvested outstanding options unadjusted for estimated forfeitures. Other provisions of ASU 2016-09 had no impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements during the current period or previously reported periods but may in the future.

Other Recently Issued Guidance

Management does not believe that any other recently issued accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB or guidance issued by the SEC did or is expected to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.
Assumptions Used in Determining Fair Value of Warrants
Assumptions Used In Determining Fair Value of Warrants

The estimated fair value of warrants is determined using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs.  Inherent in the Monte Carlo simulation valuation method are the following assumptions:

Volatility. The Company estimates volatility based on the Company’s historical volatility over a period that matches the expected remaining life of the warrants.

Risk-free interest rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the valuation date commensurate with the expected remaining life assumption.
Expected remaining life. The expected life of the warrants is assumed to be equivalent to their remaining contractual term.

Dividend rate. The dividend rate is based on the historical rate, which the Company anticipates will remain at zero.

Scenarios.  The probability of complex features of the warrants being triggered is subjective (no observable inputs or available market data) and based on internal and external information known to management at the valuation date.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
    
The Company uses the accounting guidance on fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The Company uses a fair value hierarchy, which distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The guidance requires fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories within the hierarchy:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each reporting period.