XML 52 R83.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
NOTE 13 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - (Details Narrative) (USD $)
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Jun. 30, 2013
Rent Expense $ 4,571,000 $ 4,035,000
Early termination Expense rent   690,000
Employer Contributions to 401(k) Plan      
Average Monthly Payment for Stipulation Agreements 19,552  
Settlement of Case (value)    (755,500)
Recorded sales tax obligations - principal 2,665,000  
Recorded sales tax obligations - interest and penalties 2,374,000  
Recorded provisions for penalties - Department of Labor and Internal Revenue Service regulations concerning the requirements to file Form 5500 to report activity of its 401K Employee Benefit Plan. 250,000  
Reserve for Self-Funded Health Insurance Program 344,000   
Stop-Loss Umbrella Policy with 3rd ParyInsurer to Limit Maximum Potential Liability for individual Claims 100,000  
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
   
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) The stockholders of the Company approved the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) at the Companys annual stockholders meeting in April 2000. The ESPP provides for eligible employees to acquire common stock of the Company at a discount, not to exceed 15%. This plan has not been put into effect as of June 30, 2014.  
Golden Triangle
   
Details of Case On or about June 30, 2010, one of Fonars customers, Golden Triangle Company, Golden Triangle Company v. Fonar Corporation et al, Plaintiff sought up to $5,000,000. Fonar made a motion to dismiss the complaint, the outcome of which left Plaintiff with only a cause of action for breach of contract. The case was settled in June 2013 for $480,000 in cash and 30,000 shares of Fonars common stock payable in installments. The Company recorded a gain of $755,500 on the statements of income for the year ended June 30, 2013.  
Settlement of Case (value) 480,000  
Settlement of Case (shares) 30,000  
Jack Shapiro
   
Details of Case Jack Shapiro v. Fonar Corporation, July, 2009 to recover $500,000 based on Fonars failure to refund a deposit on an MRI scanner and termination of plaintiffs sales representative agreement. During the year ended June 30, 2013 the case has been settled for $323,000 payable in installments, subject to the plaintiff obtaining a sale for Fonar and the payment of installments of the purchase price by the customer.  
Settlement of Case (value) 323,000  
Matt Malek Madison
   
Details of Case Matt Malek Madison v. Fonar Corporation, August 27, 2007 to recover a down payment for a scanner in the amount of $300,000, with interest. Fonar answered the complaint and sued the plaintiff for breach of contract in the amount of $450,000. Although the case has been concluded, the plaintiff has not taken any steps to collect the judgment. As of June 30, 2014 and 2013, $300,000 was included in the Companys accrued expenses.  
Settlement of Case (value) 300,000  
Bonutti Research and Bolt MRI Technology
   
Details of Case Bonutti Research v. Fonar Corporation, Bonutti Research filed a patent infringement action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District Court of New York, The parties have settled the case for $150,000 payable by Fonar in twelve installments and certain licenses and covenants not to sue. The $150,000 has been recorded in the Companys consolidated statements of income for the year ended June 30, 2014. In Bolt MRI Technologies v. Fonar Corporation, The settlement of the Bonutti case covers this case as well.  
Settlement of Case (value) $ 150,000