XML 22 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Nov. 03, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The fair value of an asset is considered to be the price at which the asset could be sold in an orderly transaction between unrelated knowledgeable and willing parties. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, rather than the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value are measured using a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include:
Level 1 –
Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices in active markets
Level 2 –
Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable
Level 3 –
Unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The assets and liabilities of the Company that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of November 3, 2013 and February 3, 2013 were as follows (amounts in millions):
 
Fair Value at November 3, 2013 Using
 
Fair Value at February 3, 2013 Using
 
Level 1    
 
Level 2    
 
Level 3    
 
Level 1    
 
Level 2    
 
Level 3    
Derivative agreements - assets
$

 
$
47

 
$

 
$

 
$
64

 
$

Derivative agreements - liabilities

 
(18
)
 

 

 
(15
)
 

Total
$

 
$
29

 
$

 
$

 
$
49

 
$


The Company uses derivative financial instruments from time to time in the management of its interest rate exposure on long-term debt and its exposure on foreign currency fluctuations. The fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments was measured using level 2 inputs.
 
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Liabilities for lease obligation costs related to certain store closings and the exit of certain businesses in fiscal 2009 and 2008 were measured on a nonrecurring basis using fair value measurements with unobservable inputs (level 3). Charges related to these liabilities in the first nine months of fiscal 2013 and 2012 were not material.
Long-lived assets were analyzed for impairment on a nonrecurring basis using fair value measurements with unobservable inputs (level 3). Impairment charges related to long-lived assets in the first nine months of fiscal 2013 and 2012 were not material.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company completed its annual assessment of the recoverability of Goodwill for its U.S., Canada and Mexico reporting units. The fair values of these reporting units were estimated using the present value of expected future discounted cash flows through unobservable inputs (level 3). The Company recorded no impairment charges related to Goodwill in the first nine months of fiscal 2013.
Upon announcement in the third quarter of fiscal 2012 of its intention to close seven stores in China, the Company completed an assessment of the recoverability of Goodwill for its China reporting unit. The fair value of the China reporting unit was estimated using the present value of expected future discounted cash flows through unobservable inputs (level 3). As a result of this analysis, the Company recorded a $97 million impairment charge to Goodwill in the third quarter of fiscal 2012. See Note 4 for further discussion of the China store closings.
The aggregate fair value of the Company’s senior notes, based on quoted market prices, was $16.6 billion and $12.2 billion at November 3, 2013 and February 3, 2013, respectively, compared to a carrying value of $15.5 billion and $10.3 billion at November 3, 2013 and February 3, 2013, respectively.