XML 35 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2020
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

 

As set forth below, the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss is comprised of three main components: (i) currency translation; (ii) derivatives; and (iii) gains and losses associated with the Company’s defined benefit plan in the United Kingdom (in thousands):

 

  

September 30, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

Currency translation adjustments (1)

 $(26,439) $(27,241)

Derivative hedging activity

  (10,078)  (4,522)

Pension activity

  (909)  (931)

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss

 $(37,426) $(32,694

)

 

 

(1) 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, as a result of disposing of certain international entities, $1.5 million was reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss to “Other expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

For the Company’s international subsidiaries, the local currency is generally the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using rates in effect at the balance sheet date while revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars using average exchange rates. The cumulative translation adjustment resulting from changes in exchange rates are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in total stockholders’ equity. Net foreign exchange transaction losses of $0.7 million and gains of $0.1 million in the third quarters of 2020 and 2019, respectively, and losses of $0.4 million and $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, are included in “Other expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Taxation

 

The Company provides for estimated income taxes payable or refundable on current year income tax returns as well as the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carryforwards, based upon enacted tax laws and tax rates, and in accordance with FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes (“FASB ASC 740”). FASB ASC 740 also requires that a valuation allowance be recorded against any deferred tax assets that are not likely to be realized in the future. The determination is based on the Company’s ability to generate future taxable income and, at times, is dependent on its ability to implement strategic tax initiatives to ensure full utilization of recorded deferred tax assets. Should the Company not be able to implement the necessary tax strategies, it may need to record valuation allowances for certain deferred tax assets, including those related to foreign income tax benefits. Significant management judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowances recorded against net deferred tax assets.

 

Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Earnings per Share

 

Earnings per share have been calculated using the following share information:

 

  

Quarter Ended September 30,

  

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2020

  

2019

 

Weighted average number of common shares used for basic EPS

  30,770,324   30,866,188   30,738,150   31,259,594 

Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted and deferred stock unit awards

     511,244       

Weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common stock used for dilutive EPS

  30,770,324   31,377,432   30,738,150   31,259,594 

 

The Company excluded 501,802 and 484,712 restricted and deferred stock units for the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2020, respectively, and 497,192 restricted and deferred stock units for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2019 from the diluted earnings per share calculation for the Company’s common stock because of the reported net loss for the periods.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

 

The Company classifies highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less as cash equivalents. Recorded book values are reasonable estimates of fair value for cash and cash equivalents.

 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows are as follows (in thousands):

 

Balance sheet data

 

September 30, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $75,758  $64,874 

Restricted cash

  986   1,348 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 $76,744  $66,222 

 

Restricted cash held in escrow primarily relates to funds reserved for legal requirements, deposits made in lieu of retention on specific projects performed for municipalities and state agencies, or advance customer payments and compensating balances for bank undertakings in Europe. Restricted cash related to operations is similar to retainage, and is, therefore, classified as a current asset, consistent with the Company’s policy on retainage.

 

Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Fair Value Measurements

 

FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements (“FASB ASC 820”), defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring and disclosing fair value instruments. The guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include:

 

 

Level 1 – defined as quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments;

 

Level 2 – defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

 

Level 3 – defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

 

The Company uses these levels of hierarchy to measure the fair value of certain financial instruments on a recurring basis, such as for derivative instruments; on a non-recurring basis, such as for acquisitions and impairment testing; for disclosure purposes, such as for long-term debt; and for other applications, as discussed in their respective footnotes. Changes in assumptions or estimation methods could affect the fair value estimates. Other financial instruments including notes payable are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value, and is based on Level 2 inputs as previously defined. The Company had no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 inputs during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019.

 

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Long-Lived Assets

 

Property, plant and equipment and other identified intangibles (primarily customer relationships, patents and acquired technologies, trademarks, licenses and non-compete agreements) are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation, amortization and impairment, and, except for goodwill, are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Changes in circumstances such as technological advances, changes to the Company’s business model or changes in the Company’s capital strategy can result in the actual useful lives differing from the Company’s estimates. If the Company determines that the useful life of its property, plant and equipment or its identified intangible assets should be shortened, the Company would prospectively depreciate or amortize the net book value in excess of the salvage value over its revised remaining useful life, thereby increasing depreciation or amortization expense.

 

Long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and other intangibles, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Such impairment tests are based on a comparison of undiscounted cash flows to the recorded value of the asset. The estimate of cash flow is based upon, among other things, assumptions about expected future operating performance. The Company’s estimates of undiscounted cash flow may differ from actual cash flow due to, among other things, technological changes, economic conditions, changes to its business model or changes in its operating performance. If an impairment is determined to exist, any related impairment loss is calculated based on fair value. Impairment losses on assets to be disposed of, if any, are based on the estimated proceeds to be received, less costs of disposal.

 

Impairment Review – Third Quarter 2020

 

The oil and gas industry experienced an unprecedented disruption during the first nine months of 2020 as a result of a combination of factors, including the substantial decline in global demand for oil caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. These market conditions have significantly impacted a portion of the Company’s business, with a more severe impact to the refinery industry on the United States West Coast. Customers in our Energy Services reporting unit continue to revise their capital and maintenance budgets in order to adjust spending levels in response to the lower commodity prices and lower fuel demand, and the Company has experienced significant activity reductions and pricing pressure for its services, which management now expects to continue for the foreseeable future. Given the prolonged uncertainty, management performed a market assessment of the Energy Services reporting unit during the third quarter of 2020 and concluded that sustained low oil prices and lower fuel demand would continue to create market challenges for the foreseeable future, including a continued reduction in spending by certain of our customers in 2020 and into 2021. As a result, the Company determined a triggering event had occurred and evaluated the fair value of long-lived assets in its Energy Services reporting unit in accordance with FASB ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment (“FASB ASC 360”). The results of the Energy Services reporting unit and its related asset groups are reported within the Energy Services reportable segment.

 

The assets of an asset group represent the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows can be determined independent of other groups of assets and liabilities. The Energy Services asset group was the only at-risk asset group reviewed for impairment. The Company developed internal forward business plans under the guidance of local and regional leadership to determine the undiscounted expected future cash flows derived from Energy Services’ long-lived assets. Such were based on management’s best estimates considering the likelihood of various outcomes. Based on the internal projections, the Company determined that the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows for the Energy Services asset group exceeded the carrying value of the assets and no impairment was recorded.

 

The fair value estimates described above were determined using observable inputs and significant unobservable inputs, which are based on level 3 inputs as defined in the Fair Value Measurements section above.

 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Goodwill, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Goodwill

 

Under FASB ASC 350, Goodwill and Other (“FASB ASC 350”), the Company conducts an impairment test of goodwill on an annual basis or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. An impairment charge will be recognized to the extent that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Factors that could potentially trigger an impairment review include (but are not limited to):

 

 

significant underperformance of a segment relative to expected, historical or forecasted operating results;

 

significant negative industry or economic trends;

 

significant changes in the strategy for a segment including extended slowdowns in the segment’s market;

 

a decrease in market capitalization below the Company’s book value; and

 

a significant change in regulations.

 

Whether during the annual impairment assessment or during a trigger-based impairment review, the Company estimates the fair value of its reporting units and compares such fair value to the carrying value of those reporting units to determine if there are any indications of goodwill impairment.

 

Fair value of reporting units is estimated using a combination of two valuation methods: a market approach and an income approach with each method given equal weight in estimating the fair value assigned to each reporting unit. Absent an indication of fair value from a potential buyer or similar specific transaction, the Company believes the use of these two methods provides a reasonable estimate of a reporting unit’s fair value. Assumptions common to both methods are operating plans and economic outlooks, which are used to forecast future revenues, earnings and after-tax cash flows for each reporting unit. These assumptions are applied consistently for both methods.

 

The market approach estimates fair value by first determining earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) multiples for comparable publicly traded companies with similar characteristics of the reporting unit. The EBITDA multiples for comparable companies are based upon current enterprise value. The enterprise value is based upon current market capitalization and includes a control premium. The Company believes this approach is appropriate because it provides a fair value estimate using multiples from entities with operations and economic characteristics comparable to its reporting units.

 

The income approach is based on forecasted future (debt-free) cash flows that are discounted to present value using factors that consider timing and risk of future cash flows. The Company believes this approach is appropriate because it provides a fair value estimate based upon the reporting unit’s expected long-term operating cash flow performance. Discounted cash flow projections are based on financial forecasts developed from operating plans and economic outlooks, revenue growth rates, estimates of future expected changes in operating margins, terminal value growth rates, future capital expenditures and changes in working capital requirements. Estimates of discounted cash flows may differ from actual cash flows due to, among other things, changes in economic conditions, changes to business models, changes in the Company’s weighted average cost of capital, or changes in operating performance.

 

The discount rate applied to the estimated future cash flows is one of the most significant assumptions utilized under the income approach. The Company determines the appropriate discount rate for each of its reporting units based on the weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) for each individual reporting unit. The WACC takes into account both the pre-tax cost of debt and cost of equity (including the risk-free rate on twenty-year U.S. Treasury bonds), and certain other company-specific and market-based factors. As each reporting unit has a different risk profile based on the nature of its operations, the WACC for each reporting unit is adjusted, as appropriate, to account for company-specific risks. Accordingly, the WACC for each reporting unit may differ.

 

Impairment Review – Third Quarter 2020

 

Given the prolonged uncertainty in the oil and gas markets and the market assessment of the Energy Services reporting unit discussed above, the Company evaluated the goodwill of its Energy Services reporting unit during the third quarter of 2020 and determined that a triggering event had occurred. As such, the Company engaged a third-party valuation firm and performed a goodwill impairment review for its Energy Services reporting unit. In accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 820 and FASB ASC 350, the Company determined the fair value of the reporting unit and compared such fair value to the carrying value of the reporting unit. For the Energy Services reporting unit, carrying value exceeded fair value by 31.3%.

 

The values derived from both the income approach and the market approach decreased from the October 1, 2019 annual goodwill impairment analysis. The fair value for the Energy Services reporting unit decreased $67.8 million, or 44.0%, from the previous analysis. The impairment analysis assumed a weighted average cost of capital of 15.0%, which is higher than the 13.0% utilized in the October 1, 2019 review, primarily due to increased company-specific risk factors related to uncertainties in the timing of recovery for the refinery industry on the United States West Coast. Offsetting the increase in company-specific risk factors were declining risk-free rates on twenty-year U.S. Treasury bonds. The impairment analysis also assumed an annual revenue growth rate of 3.2%, which was reduced from 3.4% used in the October 1, 2019 review primarily due to an expected continuation of reduced spending by certain customers in 2020 and into 2021. Expected gross margins decreased more than 100 basis points, particularly in the short and intermediate term, primarily due to pricing pressures for maintenance work and continued uncertainty in the demand for higher-margin construction and turnaround projects.

 

Based on the impairment analysis, the Company determined that recorded goodwill at the Energy Services reporting unit was impaired by $39.4 million, which was recorded to “Goodwill impairment” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations during the third quarter of 2020. As of September 30, 2020, the Company had remaining Energy Services goodwill of $7.3 million. Projected cash flows incorporate inherent uncertainties, including supply and demand for our services and future market conditions, which are difficult to predict in volatile economic environments. Because of the rapidly changing environment, there continues to be uncertainty and unpredictability around the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will ultimately impact the results of our Energy Services reporting unit, which could be material. If these assumptions do not materialize in a manner consistent with Company’s expectations, there is risk of additional impairment to recorded goodwill.

 

The fair value estimates described above were determined using observable inputs and significant unobservable inputs, which are based on level 3 inputs as defined in the Fair Value Measurements section above. There were no triggering events reported in the Company’s other five reporting units (Municipal Pipe Rehabilitation, Fyfe, Corrpro, United Pipeline Systems and Coating Services).

 

Consolidation, Variable Interest Entity, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Investments in Variable Interest Entities

 

The Company evaluates all transactions and relationships with variable interest entities (“VIE”) to determine whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of the entities in accordance with FASB ASC 810, Consolidation. There were no changes in the Company’s VIEs during the quarter ended September 30, 2020.

 

Financial data for consolidated variable interest entities are summarized in the following tables (in thousands):

 

Balance sheet data

 

September 30, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

Current assets

 $21,057  $18,304 

Non-current assets

  7,764   7,635 

Current liabilities

  9,721   8,261 

Non-current liabilities

  1,557   1,962 

 

  

Quarter Ended September 30,

  

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

Statement of operations data

 

2020

  

2019

  

2020

  

2019

 

Revenue

 $8,677  $7,275  $22,132  $20,719 

Gross profit

  3,354   2,412   7,735   6,463 

Net income (loss) attributable to Aegion Corporation

  534   (2,154)  889   (2,773)

 

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In March 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. This update provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to certain contract modifications and hedging relationships that reference London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or another reference rate expected to be discontinued. The guidance is effective immediately and can be applied prospectively to contract modifications and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated through December 31, 2022. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2019, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. The guidance is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2021, including interim periods within that fiscal year. Early adoption is permitted. The Company early-adopted this standard effective January 1, 2020, the impact of which was not material on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement: Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which modifies the disclosure requirements for Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 instruments in the fair value hierarchy. The guidance is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2020, including interim periods within that fiscal year. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2020, the impact of which was not material on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which changes the way in which entities estimate and present credit losses for most financial assets, including accounts receivable. The guidance is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2020, including interim periods within that fiscal year. For the Company’s trade receivables, certain other receivables and certain other financial instruments, the Company will be required to use a new forward-looking “expected” credit loss model based on historical loss rates that will replace the existing “incurred” credit loss model, which will generally result in earlier recognition of allowances for credit losses. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2020, the impact of which was not material on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.