XML 23 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Restated)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Restated)
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include sales returns and allowances (“SRA”), allowances for excess and obsolete inventories, allowances for doubtful accounts, provisions for income taxes and related deferred tax asset valuation allowances, stock based compensation, the impairment of long-lived assets (including intangibles, in-process research and development and goodwill) and accruals for environmental cleanup and remediation costs. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Stock Based Compensation
 
ASC 718-10 defines the fair-value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans and transactions used by the Company to account for its issuances of equity instruments to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value as well as to acquire goods or services from non-employees. Transactions in which the Company issues stock-based compensation to employees, directors and advisors and for goods or services received from non-employees are accounted for based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued. The Company utilizes pricing models in determining the fair values of options and warrants issued as stock-based compensation. These pricing models utilize the market price of the Company’s common stock and the exercise price of the option or warrant, as well as time value and volatility factors underlying the positions. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the grant.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, notes payable, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities at September 30, 2017 approximate their fair value for all periods presented.

The Company measures fair value in accordance with ASC 820-10, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures". ASC 820-10 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC 820-10 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:
 
Level 1 Inputs: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities accessible to the reporting entity at the measurement date.
 
Level 2 Inputs: Other than quoted prices included in Level 1 inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
 
Level 3 Inputs: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at measurement date. The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

As of September 30, 2017, the net carrying value of the Notes (discussed in Note 6) was approximately $118.5 million compared to their face value of $143.75 million. However, this variance is due to the conversion feature in the Notes rather than to changes in market interest rates. The Notes carry a fixed interest rate and therefore do not subject the Company to interest rate risk.

Loss Per Share
 
Basic loss per share of common stock is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share of common stock is computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potential dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Potential dilutive common stock equivalents include shares issuable upon the conversion of the Notes, the exercise of options, and the vesting of restricted stock units ("RSU's"). For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the potential dilutive common stock equivalents have been excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

(in thousands except shares and per share data) 
 
 
Three months ended 
September 30,
 
Nine months ended 
September 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
(Restated)
 
 
 
(Restated)
 
 
Basic loss per share computation:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Net loss - basic and diluted
$
(8,982
)
 
$
(2,703
)
 
$
(9,070
)
 
$
(6,554
)
Weighted average common shares - basic and diluted
53,391,948

 
53,093,368

 
53,297,889

 
53,061,630

Basic and diluted loss per share
$
(0.17
)
 
$
(0.05
)
 
$
(0.17
)
 
$
(0.12
)


Revenue Recognition

The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred or contractual services rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured in conformity with ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition”.

The Company derives its revenues from three basic types of transactions: sales of its own pharmaceutical products, sales of manufactured product for its customers included in product sales, and research and product development services and other services performed for third parties.  Due to differences in the substance of these transaction types, the transactions require, and the Company utilizes, different revenue recognition policies for each.
 
Product Sales, net, include Company Product Sales and Contract Manufacturing Sales, as follows:

Product Sales, Net
(in thousands)
 
Three months ended 
September 30,
 
Nine months ended 
September 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
(Restated)
 
 
 
(Restated)
 
 
Company product sales
$
10,947

 
$
13,901

 
$
43,271

 
$
34,185

Contract manufacturing sales
1,883

 
1,808

 
7,707

 
13,971

Product sales, net
$
12,830

 
$
15,709

 
$
50,978

 
$
48,156



Company Product Sales: The Company records revenue from Company product sales when title and risk of ownership have been transferred to the customer, which is typically upon delivery of products to the customer.
 
As is customary in the pharmaceutical industry, the Company’s gross product sales from Company label products are subject to a variety of deductions in arriving at reported net product sales. When the Company recognizes revenue from the sale of products, an estimate of SRA is recorded, which reduces product sales. Accounts receivable and/or accrued expenses are also reduced and/or increased by the SRA amount. These adjustments include estimates for chargebacks, rebates, cash discounts and returns and other allowances. These provisions are estimates based on historical payment experience, historical relationship to revenues, estimated customer inventory levels and current contract sales terms with direct and indirect customers. The estimation process used to determine our SRA provision has been applied on a consistent basis and no material adjustments have been necessary to increase or decrease our reserves for SRA as a result of a significant change in underlying estimates. The Company will use a variety of methods to assess the adequacy of our SRA reserves to ensure that our financial statements are fairly stated. These will include periodic reviews of customer inventory data, customer contract programs, subsequent actual payment experience, and product pricing trends to analyze and validate the SRA reserves.
 
The provision for chargebacks is our most significant sales allowance. A chargeback represents an amount payable in the future to a wholesaler for the difference between the invoice price paid to the Company by our wholesale customer for a particular product and the negotiated contract price that the wholesaler’s customer pays for that product. The Company’s chargeback provision and related reserve varies with changes in product mix, changes in customer pricing and changes to estimated wholesaler inventories. The provision for chargebacks also takes into account an estimate of the expected wholesaler sell-through levels to indirect customers at contract prices. The Company will validate the chargeback accrual quarterly through a review of the inventory reports obtained from our largest wholesale customers. This customer inventory information is used to verify the estimated liability for future chargeback claims based on historical chargeback and contract rates. These large wholesalers represent 90% - 95% of the Company’s chargeback payments. The Company continually monitors current pricing trends and wholesaler inventory levels to ensure the liability for future chargebacks is fairly stated.
 
Net revenues and accounts receivable balances in the Company’s consolidated financial statements are presented net of SRA estimates. Certain SRA balances are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

Gross-To-Net Sales Deductions
(in thousands)
 
Three months ended 
September 30,
 
Nine months ended 
September 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
(Restated)
 
 
 
(Restated)
 
 
Gross Company product sales
$
53,460

 
$
64,943

 
$
174,504

 
$
136,329

Reduction to gross Company product sales:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Chargebacks and billbacks
30,954

 
43,161

 
105,059

 
82,565

Sales discounts and other allowances
11,559

 
7,881

 
26,174

 
19,579

Total reduction to gross product sales
42,513

 
51,042

 
131,233

 
102,144

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company product sales, net
$
10,947

 
$
13,901

 
$
43,271

 
$
34,185

 
 
Net Company product sales of $11 million and $13.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, are included in product sales, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Net Company product sales of $43.3 million and $34.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, are included in product sales, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Accounts receivable are presented net of SRA balances of $28.1 million and $26.0 million at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Accounts payable and accrued expenses include $6.2 million and $2.9 million at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for certain fees related to services provided by the wholesalers. Wholesale fees of $1.5 million and $1.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were included in cost of goods sold. Wholesale fees of $5.7 million and $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were included in cost of goods sold. In addition, in connection with four of the 22 products the Company currently markets and distributes in its own label in the U.S., in accordance with an agreement entered into in December 2011, the Company is required to pay a royalty calculated based on net sales to one of its pharmaceutical partners. The royalty is calculated based on contracted terms of 40% of net sales for the four products, which is to be paid quarterly to the pharmaceutical partner. In accordance with the agreement, net sales exclude fees related to services provided by the wholesalers. Accounts payable and accrued expenses include $0.6 million and $0.8 million at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to these royalties. Royalty expense of $0.6 million and $0.9 million was included in cost of goods sold for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Royalty expense of $1.4 million and $2.2 million was included in cost of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company includes significant estimates to arrive at net product sales arising from wholesaler chargebacks, Medicaid and Medicare rebates, allowances and other pricing and promotional programs.
 
Contract Manufacturing Sales: The Company recognizes revenue when title transfers to its customers, which is generally upon shipment of products. These shipments are made in accordance with sales commitments and related sales orders entered into with customers either verbally or in written form. The revenues associated with these transactions, net of appropriate cash discounts, product returns and sales reserves, are recorded upon shipment of the products and are included in product sales, net on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. Contract manufacturing sales were $1.9 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively. Contract manufacturing sales were $7.7 million and $14.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
 
Research and Development Services and Other Income: The Company establishes agreed upon product development agreements with its customers to perform product development services. Product development revenues are recognized in accordance with the product development agreement upon the completion of the phases of development and when the Company has no future performance obligations relating to that phase of development. Revenue recognition requires the Company to assess progress against contracted obligations to assure completion of each stage. These payments are generally non-refundable and are reported as deferred until they are recognizable as revenue. If no such arrangement exists, product development fees are recognized ratably over the entire period during which the services are performed. Other types of revenue include royalty or licensing revenue, and would be recognized based upon the contractual agreement upon completion of the earnings process.

Property, Plant and Equipment
 
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment is provided for under the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives as follows:
 
Useful Lives
Buildings and Improvements
10 - 40 years
Machinery and Equipment
3 - 10 years

 
Repair and maintenance costs are charged to operations as incurred while major improvements are capitalized. When assets are retired or disposed, the related cost and accumulated depreciation thereon are removed and any gains or losses are included in operating results. Interest expense and related payroll costs are capitalized on the portion of debt that is attributable to the expenditures for the plant expansion, related equipment and direct personnel costs.
 
Concentration of Credit Risk
 
Major customers of the Company are defined as those constituting greater than 10% of our total revenue. For the three months ended September 30, 2017, three of the Company’s customers accounted for 53% of the Company’s revenue, consisting of 26%, 14%, and 13%, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, two of the Company’s customers accounted for 31% of the Company’s revenue, consisting of 18% and 13%, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, three of the Company's customers accounted for 55% of the Company's revenue, consisting of 26%, 15% and 14%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, three of the Company's customers accounted for 40% of the Company's revenue, consisting of 19%, 11% and 10%. Accounts receivable related to the Company’s major customers comprised 87% of all accounts receivable as of September 30, 2017, and 45% of all accounts receivable as of September 30, 2016. The loss of one or more of these customers could have a significant impact on our revenues and harm our business and results of operations.
 
For the three months ended September 30, 2017, domestic net revenues were $10.1 million and foreign net revenues were $2.8 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, domestic net revenues were $41.8 million and foreign net revenues were $9.3 million. As of September 30, 2017, domestic assets were $124.7 million and foreign assets were $69.8 million. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, domestic net revenues were $13.5 million and foreign net revenues were $2.7 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, domestic net revenues were $41.2 million and foreign net revenues were $7.7 million. As of September 30, 2016, domestic assets were $135.5 million and foreign assets were $51.7 million.

Foreign Currency Translation
 
The net assets of international subsidiaries where the local currencies have been determined to be the functional currencies are translated into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates. The U.S. dollar effects that arise from translating the net assets of these subsidiaries at changing rates are recorded in the foreign currency translation account, which is included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) ("AOCI") and reflected as a separate component of equity. For those subsidiaries where the U.S. dollar has been determined to be the functional currency, non-monetary foreign currency assets and liabilities are translated using historical rates, while monetary assets and liabilities are translated at current rates, with the U.S. dollar effects of rate changes included in Foreign currency exchange gain line item under the Other income (expense), net section of the Income Statement.

Reclassification

Certain prior year amounts were reclassified to conform to current year presentation. In addition, the Company has reclassified certain non-cash transactions related to the capital expenditures, in the amount of $220,000, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, reducing both cash from operating activities and cash used in investing activities.  For the year ended December 31, 2016, the impact of such reclassification of the non-cash portion of the capital expenditures would have been a reduction of both cash from operating activities and cash used in investing activities, in the amount of $1.8 million.

Prior period adjustment

During the third quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded an adjustment in the amount of $0.5 million to reduce the foreign exchange gain on the statement of operations, $0.3 million decrease in cash and $0.2 million decrease in other comprehensive income, that related to the three months ended June 30, 2017, as a result of an error regarding the classification and translation of a cash amount related to their wholly owned subsidiary, “Teligent, OU” and as a result of an error regarding the translation of the foreign subsidiaries. The Company concluded that the correction of these errors was immaterial, both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Debt Issuance Costs
 
Expenses related to debt financing activities are capitalized and amortized on an effective interest method, over the term of the loan. See detailed amounts per year in Note 6.

ASU 2015-3 specifies that debt issuance costs are to be netted against the carrying value of the financial liability. Under prior guidance, debt issuance costs were recognized as a deferred charge and reported as a separate asset on the balance sheet. The updated guidance aligns the treatment of debt issuance costs and debt discounts in that both reduce the carrying value of the liability. Amortization of debt issuance costs is to be recorded as interest expense on the income statement.
 
Adoption of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs". The update simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. ASU 2015-03 is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company's adoption of this ASU, effective January 1, 2016, did not have any significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory”. ASU 2015-11 requires inventory measured using any method other than last-in, first out (“LIFO”) or the retail inventory method to be subsequently measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value, rather than at the lower of cost or market. Under this ASU, subsequent measurement of inventory using the LIFO and retail inventory method is unchanged. ASU 2015-11 is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company's adoption of this ASU, effective January 1, 2017, did not have any significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. The update includes multiple provisions intended to simplify various aspects of the accounting for share-based payments, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this update are effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company has adopted this ASU, effective January 1, 2017, and is recognizing windfall tax benefits in additional paid in capital on a prospective basis.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842): “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. The update supersedes Topic 840, Leases and requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. Topic 842 retains a distinction between finance leases and operating leases, with cash payments from operating leases classified within operating activities in the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 for public business entities, which for the Company means January 1, 2019. The Company's adoption of this ASU, is not expected to have any significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): “Clarifying the Definition of a Business”. The update clarifies the definition of a business, specifically for companies to better evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments in this update are effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. For the Company, the amendments are effective January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): “Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the September 22, 2016 and November 17, 2016 EITF Meetings”. The update shows amendments to two SEC Announcements made late in 2016 regarding four specific standards as follows: ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), and ASU 2014-01, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323). The amendments in this update require changes to the U.S. GAAP Financial Reporting Taxonomy and the changes will be incorporated into the proposed 2018 Taxonomy which are available for public comment and finalized as part of the annual release process. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”. The update simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. It affects public entities that have goodwill reported in their financial statements and have not elected the private company alternative for the subsequent measurement of goodwill. A public entity that is a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filer should adopt the amendments in this update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. For the Company, the amendments are effective January 1, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): “Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets”. This update addresses guidance for partial sales of nonfinancial assets. It affects (i) an entity that enters into a contract to transfer to a customer a nonfinancial asset, group of nonfinancial assets, or ownership interest in a consolidated subsidiary that is not a business or nonprofit entity, (ii) an entity that historically had transactions within the scope of the real estate-specific derecognition guidance, and (iii) an entity that contributes nonfinancial assets that are not a business or a nonprofit activity to a joint venture or other noncontrolled investee. The amendments are effective at the same time as the amendments in ASU 2014-09. Therefore, for the Company, the amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Public entities may apply the guidance earlier but only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company does not currently expect to enter into any such nonfinancial asset or ownership interest in its consolidated subsidiaries agreements but will refer to the guidance in ASU 2017-05 should that occur. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): “Scope of Modification Accounting”. This update provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The amendments affect any entity that changes the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. For the Company, the amendments are effective January 1, 2018. The Company has not made any changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards but will refer to the guidance in ASU 2017-09 should that occur. The Company's adoption of this ASU is not expected to have any significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Topic 606 Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The standard, including subsequently issued amendments, will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The key focus of the new standard is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this key focus, there is a five-step approach outlined in the standard. Entities are permitted to apply the new standard either retrospectively, subject to certain practical expedients, or the modified retrospective method that requires the application of the guidance only to contracts that are uncompleted on the date of initial application. For the Company, Topic 606 and subsequently issued amendments will be effective January 1, 2018.

The Company has completed its initial assessment of the new standard, including a detailed review of the Company’s contract portfolio and revenue streams to identify potential differences in accounting as a result of the new standard, and selected the modified retrospective method. Based on the Company’s initial assessment, we do not believe that the adoption of the standard and related amendments will have a significant impact on our revenue recognition patterns as compared to our current revenue recognition policies, assuming that contract structures similar to those in place are in effect at the time of our adoption. However, there are certain industry-specific implementation issues that are still unresolved and, depending on the resolution of these matters, conclusions on the impact on our revenue recognition patterns could change. Through the date of adoption, we will continue to evaluate the impacts of the standard to ensure that our preliminary conclusions continue to remain accurate. Additionally, we will continue our assessment of the impact of the standard on our financial statement disclosures which are expected to be more extensive based on the requirements of the new standard.