10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

Or

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 0-10436

L.B. Foster Company

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania	25-1324733
(State of Incorporation)	(I. R. S. Employer Identification No.)

415 Holiday Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania	15220
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(412) 928-3400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at October 26, 2016
Common Stock, Par Value $.01		10,393,449 Shares

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

	Page
PART I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited):
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss		5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		8
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		25
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		37
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		37
PART II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		38
Item 1A. Risk Factors		38
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		38
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures		38
Item 6. Exhibits		39
Signature		40
Index to Exhibits		41

2

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2016			2015
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,651		$	33,312
Accounts receivable - net		64,908			78,487
Inventories - net		91,381			96,396
Prepaid income tax		7,389			1,131
Other current assets		6,195			5,148
Total current assets		173,524			214,474
Property, plant, and equipment - net		106,147			126,745
Other assets:
Goodwill		19,387			81,752
Other intangibles - net		65,813			134,927
Deferred tax assets		39,009			226
Investments		4,374			5,321
Other assets		3,026			3,215
Total assets	$	411,280		$	566,660
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	41,287		$	55,804
Deferred revenue		7,357			6,934
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		7,945			10,255
Accrued warranty		9,034			8,755
Current maturities of long-term debt		1,326			1,335
Other accrued liabilities		11,046			8,563
Total current liabilities		77,995			91,646
Long-term debt		134,299			167,419
Deferred tax liabilities		6,998			8,926
Other long-term liabilities		15,225			15,837
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $.01, authorized 20,000,000 shares; shares issued at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 11,115,779; shares outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 10,300,823 and 10,221,006, respectively		111			111
Paid-in capital		44,220			46,681
Retained earnings		174,517			276,571
Treasury stock - at cost, common stock, shares at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 814,956 and 894,773, respectively		(19,644	)		(22,591	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(22,441	)		(17,940	)
Total stockholders’ equity		176,763			282,832
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	411,280		$	566,660

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except share data)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Sales of goods	$	100,293		$	147,648		$	326,278		$	417,224
Sales of services		14,351			28,411			50,670			68,161
Total net sales		114,644			176,059			376,948			485,385
Cost of goods sold		81,674			117,474			260,705			328,461
Cost of services sold		13,167			22,547			44,667			53,143
Total cost of sales		94,841			140,021			305,372			381,604
Gross profit		19,803			36,038			71,576			103,781
Selling and administrative expenses		19,807			21,605			65,941			68,133
Amortization expense		1,763			3,337			7,818			8,950
Asset impairments		6,946			80,337			135,884			80,337
Interest expense		1,520			1,265			4,342			3,166
Interest income		(50	)		(66	)		(157	)		(160	)
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments		263			299			946			312
Other income		(1,085	)		(537	)		(263	)		(1,245	)
		29,164			106,240			214,511			159,493
Loss before income taxes		(9,361	)		(70,202	)		(142,935	)		(55,712	)
Income tax benefit		(3,379	)		(12,780	)		(42,125	)		(7,939	)
Net loss	$	(5,982	)	$	(57,422	)	$	(100,810	)	$	(47,773	)
Basic loss per common share	$	(0.58	)	$	(5.60	)	$	(9.82	)	$	(4.65	)
Diluted loss per common share	$	(0.58	)	$	(5.60	)	$	(9.82	)	$	(4.65	)
Dividends paid per common share	$	0.04		$	0.04		$	0.12		$	0.12

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Net loss	$	(5,982	)	$	(57,422	)	$	(100,810	)	$	(47,773	)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(1,431	)		(3,297	)		(3,438	)		(4,783	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax expense (benefit) of $88, $(184) and $(815), $(184)		137			(294	)		(1,286	)		(294	)
Reclassification of pension liability adjustments to earnings, net of tax expense of $38, $46 and $115, $140*		73			90			223			271
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(1,221	)		(3,501	)		(4,501	)		(4,806	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(7,203	)	$	(60,923	)	$	(105,311	)	$	(52,579	)

* Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for pension obligations are charged to selling and administrative expense.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2016			2015
	(Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(100,810	)	$	(47,773	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities:
Deferred income taxes		(39,690	)		(17,281	)
Depreciation		10,620			10,593
Amortization		7,818			8,950
Asset impairments		135,884			80,337
Equity loss in nonconsolidated investments		946			312
Loss on sales and disposals of property, plant, and equipment		209			125
Share-based compensation		875			1,382
Excess income tax deficiency (benefit) from share-based compensation		124			(289	)
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable		13,491			(1,485	)
Inventories		3,188			(1,283	)
Other current assets		(379	)		625
Prepaid income tax		(6,436	)		2,969
Other noncurrent assets		117			(1,101	)
Dividends from LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC		—			90
Accounts payable		(13,256	)		(16,058	)
Deferred revenue		866			(317	)
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		(2,294	)		(5,283	)
Other current liabilities		956			(370	)
Other liabilities		(353	)		(455	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		11,876			13,688
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment		923			389
Capital expenditures on property, plant, and equipment		(6,507	)		(11,618	)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		—			(193,871	)
Loans and capital contributions to equity method investment		(635	)		(61	)
Net cash used by investing activities		(6,219	)		(205,161	)

6

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)

(In thousands)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2016			2015
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayments of debt		(134,200	)		(108,777	)
Proceeds from debt		101,075			289,764
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock awards		—			68
Financing fees		(712	)		(1,670	)
Treasury stock acquisitions		(265	)		(2,686	)
Cash dividends on common stock paid to shareholders		(1,244	)		(1,244	)
Excess income tax (deficiency) benefit from share-based compensation		(124	)		289
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities		(35,470	)		175,744
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		152			(3,085	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(29,661	)		(18,814	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		33,312			52,024
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	3,651		$	33,210
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	3,485		$	2,513
Income taxes paid	$	3,991		$	6,280

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all estimates and adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. However, actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016. The year-end Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015 was derived from audited financial statements. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” refer collectively to L.B. Foster Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Recently issued accounting standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605, “Revenue Recognition.” ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. It also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating its implementation approach and assessing the impact of ASU 2014-09 on our financial position and results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. The new accounting requirements include the accounting for, presentation of, and classification of leases. The guidance will result in most leases being capitalized as a right of use asset with a related liability on our balance sheets. The requirements of the new standard are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is in the process of analyzing the impact of ASU 2016-02 on our financial position and results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718).” This standard makes several modifications to Topic 718 related to the accounting for forfeitures, employer tax withholding on share-based compensation, and the financial statement presentation of excess tax benefits or deficiencies. ASU 2016-09 also clarifies the statement of cash flows presentation for certain components of share-based awards. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, although early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of analyzing the impact of ASU 2016-09 on our financial position and results of operations.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, “Income Taxes – Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (Topic 740”), which will require an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. The ASU is effective on January 1, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-16 will have on our financial position and results of operations.

8

2. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company is a leading manufacturer, fabricator, and distributor of products and services for rail, construction, energy, and utility markets. The Company is organized and evaluated by product group, which is the basis for identifying reportable segments. Each segment represents a revenue-producing component of the Company for which separate financial information is produced internally and is subject to evaluation by the Company’s chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources. Each segment is evaluated based upon its respective contribution to the Company’s consolidated results based upon segment profit.

The following table illustrates revenues and profits (losses) from operations of the Company by segment for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016					Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
	Net Sales		Segment Profit (loss)			Net Sales		Segment Profit (loss)
Rail Products and Services	$	56,891	$	(2,047	)	$	188,686	$	(26,474	)
Construction Products		34,870		1,356			107,098		5,748
Tubular and Energy Services		22,883		(6,966	)		81,164		(111,876	)
Total	$	114,644	$	(7,657	)	$	376,948	$	(132,602	)
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2015					Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
	Net Sales		Segment Profit (loss)			Net Sales		Segment Profit (loss)
Rail Products and Services	$	87,972	$	6,984		$	252,530	$	19,469
Construction Products		54,093		4,456			137,899		10,842
Tubular and Energy Services		33,994		(79,873	)		94,956		(77,557	)
Total	$	176,059	$	(68,433	)	$	485,385	$	(47,246	)

Segment profits (losses) from operations, as shown above, include internal cost of capital charges for assets used in the segment at a rate of generally 1% per month. There has been no change in the measurement of segment profit from operations since December 31, 2015. The internal cost of capital charges are eliminated during the consolidation process.

The following table provides a reconciliation of reportable segment net profit from operations to the Company’s consolidated total:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Loss for reportable segments	$	(7,657	)	$	(68,433	)	$	(132,602	)	$	(47,246	)
Interest expense		(1,520	)		(1,265	)		(4,342	)		(3,166	)
Interest income		50			66			157			160
Other income		1,085			537			263			1,245
LIFO income		917			181			1,442			581
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments		(263	)		(299	)		(946	)		(312	)
Corporate expense, cost of capital elimination, and other unallocated charges		(1,973	)		(989	)		(6,907	)		(6,974	)
Loss before income taxes	$	(9,361	)	$	(70,202	)	$	(142,935	)	$	(55,712	)

9

The following table illustrates assets of the Company by segment:

	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Rail Products and Services	$	155,657	$	241,222
Construction Products		83,061		86,335
Tubular and Energy Services		103,976		216,715
Unallocated corporate assets		68,586		22,388
Total	$	411,280	$	566,660

3. ACQUISITIONS

TEW Plus, LTD

On November 23, 2015, the Company acquired the 75% balance of the remaining shares of TEW Plus, LTD (“Tew Plus”) for $2,130, net of cash acquired. Headquartered in Nottingham, UK, Tew Plus provides telecommunications and security systems to the railway and commercial markets. Their offerings include full installation services including: design; project management; survey; and commissioning along with future maintenance. The results of Tew Plus’ operations are included within the Rail Products and Services segment from the date of acquisition.

Inspection Oilfield Services

On March 13, 2015, the Company acquired IOS Holdings, Inc. (“IOS” or “test and inspection services”) for $167,404, net of cash acquired and a net working capital receivable adjustment of $2,363. The purchase agreement includes an earn-out provision for the seller to generate an additional $60,000 of proceeds upon achieving certain levels of EBITDA during the three-year period beginning on January 1, 2015. The Company has not accrued an estimated earn-out obligation based upon a probability weighted valuation model of the projected EBITDA results, which indicates that the minimum target will not be achieved. Approximately $7,600 of the purchase price relates to amounts held in escrow to satisfy potential indemnity claims made under the purchase agreement. Headquartered in Houston, TX, IOS is a leading independent provider of tubular management services with operations in every significant oil and gas producing region in the continental United States. The results of IOS are included within our Tubular and Energy Services segment from the date of acquisition.

Tew Holdings, LTD

On January 13, 2015, the Company acquired Tew Holdings, LTD (“Tew”) for $26,467, net of cash acquired. The purchase price includes approximately $4,200 related to working capital and net debt adjustments. The non-domestic cash payment includes approximately $600 which is held in escrow to satisfy potential indemnity claims made under the purchase agreement. Headquartered in Nottingham, UK, Tew provides application engineering solutions primarily to the rail market and other major industries. The results of Tew’s operations are included within the Rail Products and Services segment from the date of acquisition.

Acquisition Summary

Each transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which requires an acquiring entity to recognize, with limited exceptions, all of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at fair value as of the acquisition date. Goodwill primarily represents the value paid for each acquisition’s enhancement to the Company’s product and service offerings and capabilities, as well as a premium payment related to the ability to control the acquired assets. The Company has concluded that intangible assets and goodwill values resulting from the IOS, Tew, and Tew Plus transactions are not deductible for tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition:

Allocation of Purchase Price	November 23, 2015 - Tew Plus			March 13, 2015 - IOS			January 13, 2015 -Tew
Current assets	$	4,420		$	19,877		$	12,125
Other assets		—			708			—
Property, plant, and equipment		47			51,453	*		2,398
Goodwill		822			69,908	*		8,772
Other intangibles		1,074			50,354	*		14,048
Liabilities assumed		(3,597	)		(23,596	)		(6,465	)
Total	$	2,766		$	168,704		$	30,878

10

* - As a result of the impact of the downturn within the energy markets, the expectations of a prolonged period before recovery, and the reduction in active U.S. land oil rig count, the Company performed an interim test for impairment of goodwill during the third quarter of 2015 that resulted in the full impairment of goodwill related to the IOS acquisition. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2016, the Company performed an interim impairment test due to further deterioration in projections that resulted in impairment of property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets as described in Notes 4 and 5.

The following table summarizes the estimates of the fair values of the identifiable intangible assets acquired:

Intangible Asset	November 23, 2015 - Tew Plus		March 13, 2015 - IOS			January 13, 2015 - Tew
Trade name	$	—	$	2,641		$	870
Customer relationships		817		41,171			10,035
Technology		203		4,364			2,480
Non-competition agreements		54		2,178			663
Total identified intangible assets	$	1,074	$	50,354	**	$	14,048

** - See Note 5 regarding intangible asset impairments.

4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant, and equipment at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 consist of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Land	$	14,848	$	17,054
Improvements to land and leaseholds		17,626		16,590
Buildings		33,917		39,366
Machinery and equipment, including equipment under capitalized leases		116,355		118,677
Construction in progress		3,598		11,844
		186,344		203,531
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization, including accumulated amortization of capitalized leases		80,197		76,786
	$	106,147	$	126,745

We review our property, plant, and equipment for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We recognize an impairment loss if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. Due to the deterioration in projected results from the IOS subsidiary within the Tubular and Energy Services segment, the undiscounted cash flows were unable to support the carrying value of the asset group. The Company utilized level 3 unobservable inputs, specifically, the discounted cash flow method, to determine the expected net cash flows generated by the continued use of the assets. As a result of the testing, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment of $14,956 during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016. The impairment is included within “Asset impairments” caption of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

11

5. GOODWILL AND DEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following table represents the goodwill balance by reportable segment:

	Rail Products and Services			Construction Products		Tubular and Energy Services			Total
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	48,188		$	5,147	$	28,417		$	81,752
Foreign currency translation impact		(1,069	)		—		—			(1,069	)
Disposition		(154	)		—		—			(154	)
Impairment charges		(32,725	)		—		(28,417	)		(61,142	)
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	14,240		$	5,147	$	—		$	19,387

The Company performs goodwill impairment tests annually during the fourth quarter, and also performs interim goodwill impairment tests if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. Qualitative factors are assessed to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. During the current year, various reporting units underperformed against their projections and revised their forecasts downward. The revised forecasts, which were primarily attributable to weakness in the rail and energy markets, indicated longer recovery horizons than we previously projected. In connection with the revisions to the longer term projections and a substantial decline in market capitalization, the Company concluded that these qualitative factors indicated that there was a more likely than not risk that the carrying value of goodwill exceeded its fair value.

As a result of the Company’s qualitative review, with the assistance of an independent valuation firm, the Company performed a quantitative interim test for impairment of goodwill as of June 1, 2016. The valuation included the use of both the income and market approaches. Greater weighting was applied to the income approach as the Company believes it is the most reliable indication of value as it captures forecasted revenues and earnings for the reporting units in the projection period that the market approach may not directly incorporate. In addition, a lack of comparable market transactions in recent months has limited the availability of information necessary for the market approach.

The results of the test indicated that the Rail Technologies (within the Rail Products and Services segment), Chemtec Energy Services, LLC (or “precision measurement systems”), and coated services (Chemtec and coated services are within the Tubular and Energy Services segment) reporting units’ respective fair values were less than their carrying value. All other reporting units that maintain goodwill substantially exceeded their carrying value and were not at risk of impairment. As a result of the continued weakness in the commodity cycles impacting the energy and rail markets, the near term projections of these reporting units have deteriorated and the expected future growth of the Rail Technologies, Chemtec, and coated services reporting units was determined to be insufficient to support the carrying values.

The Company determined the implied fair values of the Rail Technologies, Chemtec, and coated services reporting units by using level 3 unobservable inputs, which incorporated assumptions that we believe would be a reasonable market participant’s view in a hypothetical purchase, to develop the discounted cash flows of the respective reporting units. Significant level 3 inputs included the projected revenue and cost growth rates, capital expenditures, and weighted average costs of capital assumptions. The resulting fair values of each reporting unit were allocated to the assets and liabilities of the respective reporting unit as if each reporting unit had been acquired in business combinations as of the test date and the fair value was the purchase price paid to acquire each reporting unit. The results of the step 2 analysis indicated that the carrying amounts of the goodwill of Rail Technologies, Chemtec, and coated services exceeded the implied fair values of that goodwill. Accordingly, the Company recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment of $61,142, which represented the full impairment of goodwill within the Chemtec and coated services reporting units and approximately 68% of the Rail Technologies goodwill value. The impairment charge includes $4,383 related to Rail Technologies’ goodwill which was recorded during the three-month period ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the finalization of the interim impairment assessment, which the Company commenced during the second quarter.

The following table represents the gross definite-lived intangible assets balance by reportable segment:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Rail Products and Services	$	57,134	$	59,226
Construction Products		1,348		1,348
Tubular and Energy Services		29,179		98,166
	$	87,661	$	158,740

12

Due to the indicators previously noted, the Company performed recoverability tests on reporting units when it was more likely than not that the carrying value of the long-lived asset group would not be recoverable. The results of our testing indicated that the long-lived assets related to the IOS and Chemtec divisions, within the Tubular and Energy Services segment, had carrying values in excess of the asset groups’ fair value. Based upon level 3 unobservable inputs, the Company incorporated assumptions that we believe would be a reasonable market participant’s view in a hypothetical purchase, to develop the discounted cash flows. Significant level 3 inputs included the projected revenue and cost growth rates, capital expenditures, and weighted average costs of capital assumptions. As a result of the analysis, the Company recorded a $42,982 non-cash impairment of definite-lived intangible assets related to the IOS division and a $16,804 non-cash impairment of definite-lived intangible assets related to the Chemtec division. Included within the Chemtec impairment is $2,563 recorded during the three-month period ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the finalization of the Company’s interim impairment review, which the Company commenced during the second quarter.

The components of the Company’s definite-lived intangible assets are as follows:

	September 30, 2016
	Weighted Average Amortization Period In Years		Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Non-compete agreements		5	$	4,252	$	(2,005	)	$	2,247
Patents		10		380		(145	)		235
Customer relationships		17		37,295		(6,069	)		31,226
Trademarks and trade names		14		10,054		(3,036	)		7,018
Technology		14		35,680		(10,593	)		25,087
			$	87,661	$	(21,848	)	$	65,813
	December 31, 2015
	Weighted Average Amortization Period In Years		Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Non-compete agreements		4	$	6,984	$	(2,495	)	$	4,489
Patents		10		378		(124	)		254
Customer relationships		16		94,338		(8,441	)		85,897
Supplier relationships		5		350		(335	)		15
Trademarks and trade names		13		14,252		(3,025	)		11,227
Technology		13		42,438		(9,393	)		33,045
			$	158,740	$	(23,813	)	$	134,927

Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives ranging from 2 to 25 years, with a total weighted average amortization period of approximately 15 years at September 30, 2016. Amortization expense for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $1,763 and $3,337, respectively. Amortization expense for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $7,818 and $8,950, respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of 2016 and thereafter is as follows:

	Amortization Expense
2016	$	1,780
2017		7,112
2018		7,008
2019		6,276
2020		5,909
2021 and thereafter		37,728
	$	65,813

13

6. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Credit is extended based upon an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and, while collateral is not required, the Company periodically receives surety bonds that guarantee payment. The amounts of trade accounts receivable at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 have been reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,750 and $1,485, respectively.

7. INVENTORIES

Inventories at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized in the following table:

	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Finished goods	$	54,659		$	62,547
Work-in-process		20,418			20,178
Raw materials		20,683			19,492
Total inventories at current costs		95,760			102,217
Less: LIFO reserve		(4,379	)		(5,821	)
	$	91,381		$	96,396

Inventory is generally valued at the lower of last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) cost or market. Other inventories of the Company are valued at average cost or market, whichever is lower. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method is made at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end levels and costs.

8. INVESTMENTS

The Company is a member of a joint venture, LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC (“LB Pipe JV”), in which it maintains a 45% ownership interest. LB Pipe JV manufactures, markets, and sells various precision coupling products for the energy, utility, and construction markets and is scheduled to terminate on June 30, 2019.

Under applicable guidance for variable interest entities in ASC 810, “Consolidation,” the Company determined that the LB Pipe JV is a variable interest entity. The Company concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity, as the Company does not have a controlling financial interest and does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the LB Pipe JV. Accordingly, the Company concluded that the equity method of accounting remains appropriate.

At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had a nonconsolidated equity method investment of $4,245 and $5,246, respectively, in LB Pipe JV and other equity investments totaling $129 and $75, respectively.

The Company recorded equity in the loss of LB Pipe JV of $276 and $292 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded equity in the loss of LB Pipe JV of $1,001 and $289, respectively.

The Company continues to monitor the recoverability of the assets associated with LB Pipe JV and the long-term financial projections of the businesses.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2015, the Company received cash distributions from LB Pipe JV of $90. There were no changes to the members’ ownership interests as a result of the distribution. During 2016, the Company and the other 45% member each executed a revolving line of credit with the LB Pipe JV with an available limit of $750. The Company and the other 45% member each loaned $635 to the LB Pipe JV in an effort to maintain compliance with the LB Pipe JV’s debt covenants with an unaffiliated bank. The Company’s loan with the LB Pipe JV matures on December 15, 2016.

14

The Company’s exposure to loss results from its capital contributions and lending activity, net of the Company’s share of the LB Pipe JV’s income or loss, and its net investment in the direct financing lease covering the facility used by the LB Pipe JV for its operations, which is described below. The carrying amounts with the maximum exposure to loss of the Company at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, are as follows:

	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
LB Pipe JV equity method investment	$	4,245	$	5,246
Loan receivable		635		—
Net investment in direct financing lease		899		995
	$	5,779	$	6,241

The Company is leasing five acres of land and two facilities to the LB Pipe JV through June 30, 2019, with a 5.5-year renewal period. The current monthly lease payments approximate $17, with a balloon payment of approximately $488, which is required to be paid either at the termination of the lease, allocated over the renewal period, or during the initial term of the lease. This lease qualifies as a direct financing lease under the applicable guidance in ASC 840-30, “Leases.”

The following is a schedule of the direct financing minimum lease payments for the remainder of 2016 and the years 2017 and thereafter:

	Minimum Lease Payments
2016	$	35
2017		140
2018		150
2019		574
	$	899

9. LONG-TERM DEBT

United States

Long-term debt consists of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Revolving credit facility	$	132,847	$	165,000
Capital leases and financing agreements		2,778		3,754
Total		135,625		168,754
Less current maturities		1,326		1,335
Long-term portion	$	134,299	$	167,419

On June 29, 2016, L.B. Foster Company, its domestic subsidiaries, and certain of its Canadian subsidiaries (“L.B. Foster”) entered into the First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015 (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”), with PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company. This First Amendment modifies the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which had a maximum credit line of $335,000. The First Amendment reduces the permitted borrowings to $275,000. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement has been amended subsequent to September 30, 2016. See Note 16 “Subsequent Events”.

The Company’s and the domestic guarantors’ obligations under the First Amendment are secured by the grant of a security interest by the domestic borrowers and domestic guarantors in substantially all of the personal property owned by such entities. Additionally, the equity interests in each of the domestic loan parties, other than the Company, and the equity interests held by each domestic loan party in their domestic subsidiaries, are pledged to the lenders as collateral for the lending obligations.

15

Borrowings under the First Amendment bear interest at rates based upon either the base rate or Euro-rate plus applicable margins. Applicable margins are dictated by the ratio of the Company’s indebtedness less consolidated cash on hand to the Company’s consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the underlying Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The base rate is the highest of (a) PNC Bank’s prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or (c) the daily Euro-rate (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) plus 1.00%. The base rate and Euro-rate spreads range from 0.025% to 2.25% and 1.25% to 3.25%, respectively.

The First Amendment provides that liens on the collateral will be released upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including the submission by the loan parties of a compliance certificate for two consecutive fiscal quarters, calculated for the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ending, each evidencing a Leverage Ratio (defined as the Company’s indebtedness less cash on hand in excess of $15,000, divided by the Company’s consolidated EBITDA) of less than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00; provided that the last day of such two consecutive fiscal quarters cannot be earlier than June 30, 2018.

Certain financial covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were also amended. The First Amendment revises the maximum Leverage Ratio, which must not exceed the amounts set forth below for applicable fiscal quarters: June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016, 4.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2016, 4.50 to 1.00; March 31, 2017, 4.25 to 1.00; June 30, 2017, 4.00 to 1.00; September 30, 2017, 3.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2017, 3.50 to 1.00; and March 31, 2018 and all fiscal quarters ending thereafter, 3.25 to 1.00.

At September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as revised by the First Amendment.

Loans and advances to non-loan parties and loans, advances, and investments by domestic loan parties to subsidiaries that are not loan parties and to foreign loan parties is not permitted to exceed $10,000 in the aggregate at any one time, provided that, on March 31, 2018, when the Maximum Leverage Ratio requirement is 3.25 to 1.00, this limit will increase to $75,000.

The First Amendment permits the Company to pay dividends, distributions, and make redemptions with respect to its stock provided no event of default or potential default (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) has occurred prior to or after giving effect to the dividend, distribution, or redemption. Dividends, distributions, and redemptions are capped at $4,000 per year when funds are drawn on the facility until March 31, 2018, when the maximum Leverage Ratio requirement is 3.25 to 1.00, at which time this limit will increase to $25,000. Dividends of $1,244 or $0.12 per share were distributed for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016.

If no drawings on the facility exist, dividends, distributions, and redemptions in excess of $4,000 (or $25,000, as appropriate) per year are subjected to a limitation of $75,000 in the aggregate. The $75,000 aggregate limitation also permits certain loans, investments, and acquisitions.

The First Amendment provides that each of the loan parties and their subsidiaries shall not enter into any merger, consolidation, or other reorganization, or acquire all or substantially all of the assets, division, business, stock, or other ownership interests or permit any consolidation or merger with an aggregate consideration in excess of $12,000 until after March 31, 2018.

At September 30, 2016, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $425 and had gross available borrowing capacity of $141,728. The current quarter reduction in debt was largely attributable to $26,000 of short-term intercompany advances from foreign subsidiaries into the U.S., which was used to fund our revolving credit facility at September 30, 2016. The maturity date of the First Amendment is March 13, 2020.

United Kingdom

A subsidiary of the Company has a credit facility with NatWest Bank for its United Kingdom operations that includes an overdraft availability of £1,500 pounds sterling (approximately $1,946 at September 30, 2016). This credit facility supports the subsidiary’s working capital requirements and is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of its United Kingdom operations. The interest rate on this facility is the financial institution’s base rate plus 1.50%. Outstanding performance bonds reduce availability under this credit facility. The subsidiary of the Company had no outstanding borrowings under this credit facility as of September 30, 2016. There was approximately $311 in outstanding guarantees (as defined in the underlying agreement) at September 30, 2016. This credit facility was renewed and amended during the fourth quarter of 2015 to include Tew and Tew Plus as parties to the agreement. All other underlying terms and conditions remained unchanged as a result of the renewal. It is the Company’s intention to renew this credit facility with NatWest Bank during the annual review in the fourth quarter 2016.

16

The United Kingdom credit facility contains certain financial covenants that require that subsidiary to maintain senior interest and cash flow coverage ratios. The subsidiary was in compliance with these financial covenants as of September 30, 2016. The subsidiary had available borrowing capacity of $1,635 as of September 30, 2016.

10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company determines the fair value of assets and liabilities based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The fair values are based on assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in valuation techniques and the inputs to valuations. The fair value hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions of what market participants would use. The fair value hierarchy includes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as described below:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Cash equivalents - Included within “Cash and cash equivalents” are investments in non-domestic term deposits. The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of the instruments.

LIBOR-Based interest rate swaps - To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on outstanding variable-rate debt, the Company entered into forward starting LIBOR-Based interest rate swaps with notional values totaling $50,000. The swaps will become effective in February 2017, at which point it will effectively convert a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowings during the term of the swap contract. The fair value of the interest rate swaps is based on market-observable forward interest rates and represents the estimated amount that the Company would pay to terminate the agreements. As such, the swap agreements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. At September 30, 2016, the interest rate swaps were recorded within other accrued liabilities.

	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using								Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	September 30, 2016		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		December 31, 2015		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Term deposits	$	16	$	16	$	—	$	—	$	1,939	$	1,939	$	—	$	—
Total assets	$	16	$	16	$	—	$	—	$	1,939	$	1,939	$	—	$	—
Interest rate swaps	$	2,307	$	—	$	2,307	$	—	$	196	$	—	$	196	$	—
Total liabilities	$	2,307	$	—	$	2,307	$	—	$	196	$	—	$	196	$	—

17

11. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

(Share amounts in thousands)

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per common share - (Loss) available to common stockholders:
Net loss	$	(5,982	)	$	(57,422	)	$	(100,810	)	$	(47,773	)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding		10,296			10,256			10,264			10,266
Denominator for basic earnings per common share		10,296			10,256			10,264			10,266
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options		—			—			—			—
Other stock compensation plans		—			—			—			—
Dilutive potential common shares		—			—			—			—
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share - adjusted weighted average shares outstanding and assumed conversions		10,296			10,256			10,264			10,266
Basic loss per common share	$	(0.58	)	$	(5.60	)	$	(9.82	)	$	(4.65	)
Diluted loss per common share	$	(0.58	)	$	(5.60	)	$	(9.82	)	$	(4.65	)
Dividends paid per common share	$	0.04		$	0.04		$	0.12		$	0.12

During the three-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, there were approximately 34 and 48 anti-dilutive shares excluded from the preceding calculation, respectively. During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, there were 80 and 81 anti-dilutive shares excluded from the preceding calculation, respectively.

12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company applies the provisions of FASB ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” to account for the Company’s share-based compensation. Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award and is recognized over the employees’ requisite service period. The Company recorded stock compensation expense of $320 and $(514) for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to restricted stock awards and performance unit awards. Stock compensation expense of $875 and $1,382 was recorded for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. At September 30, 2016, unrecognized compensation expense for awards that the Company expects to vest approximated $1,955. The Company will recognize this expense over the upcoming four years through August 2020.

Shares issued as a result of vested stock-based compensation generally will be from previously issued shares that have been reacquired by the Company and held as Treasury shares or authorized but previously unissued common stock.

During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized reductions in excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation of $124 and excess tax benefits of $289, respectively. The change in excess income tax benefits have been included in cash flows from financing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Stock Option Awards

At September 30, 2016, there were no outstanding and exercisable stock options. During the first quarter of 2015, the remaining 7,500 outstanding stock options were exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $9.08. There were no new grants of stock option awards during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.

18

Restricted Stock Awards and Performance Unit Awards

Under the amended and restated 2006 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, the Company grants eligible employees restricted stock and performance unit awards. The forfeitable restricted stock awards granted prior to March 2015 generally time-vest after a four-year holding period, and those granted subsequent to March 2015 generally time-vest ratably over a three-year period, unless indicated otherwise by the underlying restricted stock award agreement. Performance unit awards are offered annually under separate three-year long-term incentive plans. Performance units are subject to forfeiture and will be converted into common stock of the Company based upon the Company’s performance relative to performance measures and conversion multiples as defined in the underlying plan. If the Company’s estimate of the number of performance stock awards expected to vest changes in a subsequent accounting period, cumulative compensation expense could increase or decrease. The change will be recognized in the current period for the vested shares and would change future expense over the remaining vesting period.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the Company, with shareholder approval, amended its 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan and registered 370,000 additional shares under the amendment. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the 2016 Performance Share Unit Program, the Executive Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (consisting of cash and equity components) and the 2016 Free Cash Flow Program (cash award only). The Compensation Committee also certified the actual performance achievement of participants in the 2013 Performance Share Unit Program. Actual performance resulted in no payout relative to the target performance metrics.

The following table summarizes the restricted stock award and performance unit award activity for the period ended September 30, 2016:

	Restricted Stock Units			Performance Stock Units			Weighted Average Grant Date  Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2015		93,817			35,999		$	39.66
Granted		48,283			129,844			12.50
Vested		(43,453	)		—			29.30
Adjustment for incentive awards not expected to vest		—			(93,103	)		24.79
Canceled		(6,021	)		(9,050	)		18.82
Outstanding at September 30, 2016		92,626			63,690		$	21.88

13. RETIREMENT PLANS

Retirement Plans

The Company has seven retirement plans which cover its hourly and salaried employees in the United States: three defined benefit plans (one active / two frozen) and four defined contribution plans. Employees are eligible to participate in the appropriate plan based on employment classification. The Company’s funding contributions to the defined benefit and defined contribution plans are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), applicable plan policy and investment guidelines. The Company’s policy is to contribute at least the minimum in accordance with the funding standards of ERISA.

The Company’s subsidiary, L.B. Foster Rail Technologies, Inc. (“Rail Technologies”), maintains two defined contribution plans for its employees in Canada, as well as a post-retirement benefit plan. In the United Kingdom, Rail Technologies maintains two defined contribution plans and a defined benefit plan.

19

United States Defined Benefit Plans

Net periodic pension costs for the United States defined benefit pension plans for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Service cost	$	9		$	10		$	27		$	29
Interest cost		186			185			559			555
Expected return on plan assets		(179	)		(203	)		(538	)		(611	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		69			69			207			207
Net periodic pension cost	$	85		$	61		$	255		$	180

The Company does not expect to contribute to its United States defined benefit plans in 2016.

United Kingdom Defined Benefit Plans

Net periodic pension costs for the United Kingdom defined benefit pension plan for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Interest cost	$	73		$	78		$	223		$	231
Expected return on plan assets		(82	)		(83	)		(250	)		(249	)
Amortization of prior service costs and transition amount		5			5			15			15
Recognized net actuarial loss		38			60			116			177
Net periodic pension cost	$	34		$	60		$	104		$	174

United Kingdom regulations require trustees to adopt a prudent approach to funding required contributions to defined benefit pension plans. Employer contributions of approximately $240 are anticipated to the United Kingdom L.B. Foster Rail Technologies, Inc. pension plan during 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company contributed approximately $180 to the plan.

Defined Contribution Plans

The Company sponsors eight defined contribution plans for hourly and salaried employees across our domestic and international facilities. The following table summarizes the expense associated with the contributions made to these plans.

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
United States	$	152	$	413	$	1,289	$	1,842
Canada		46		54		164		167
United Kingdom		64		162		281		360
	$	262	$	629	$	1,734	$	2,369

14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Product Liability Claims

The Company is subject to product warranty claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. For certain manufactured products, the Company maintains a product warranty accrual which is adjusted on a monthly basis as a percentage of cost of sales. The product warranty accrual is periodically adjusted based on the identification or resolution of known individual product warranty claims.

20

The following table sets forth the Company’s product warranty accrual:

	Warranty Liability
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	8,755
Additions to warranty liability		961
Warranty liability utilized		(682	)
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	9,034

Included within the above table are concrete tie warranty reserves of approximately $7,460 and $7,544 at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Concrete Tie Matter

On July 12, 2011, UPRR notified (the “UPRR Notice”) the Company and its subsidiary, CXT Incorporated (“CXT”), of a warranty claim under CXT’s 2005 supply contract relating to the sale of pre-stressed concrete railroad ties to UPRR. UPRR asserted that a significant percentage of concrete ties manufactured in 2006 through 2011 at CXT’s Grand Island, NE facility failed to meet contract specifications, had workmanship defects and were cracking and failing prematurely. Of the 3.0 million ties manufactured between 1998 and 2011 from the Grand Island, NE facility, approximately 1.6 million ties were sold during the period UPRR had claimed nonconformance. The 2005 contract called for each concrete tie which failed to conform to the specifications or had a material defect in workmanship to be replaced with 1.5 new concrete ties, provided, that, within five years of the sale of a concrete tie, UPRR notified CXT of such failure to conform or such defect in workmanship. The UPRR Notice did not specify how many ties manufactured during this period were defective nor the exact nature of the alleged workmanship defect.

Following the UPRR Notice, the Company worked with material scientists and pre-stressed concrete experts to test a representative sample of Grand Island, NE concrete ties and assess warranty claims for certain concrete ties made in its Grand Island, NE facility between 1998 and 2011. The Company discontinued manufacturing operations in Grand Island, NE in early 2011.

2012

During 2012, the Company completed sufficient testing and analysis to further understand this matter. Based upon testing results and expert analysis, the Company believed it discovered conditions, which largely related to the 2006 to 2007 manufacturing period, that can shorten the life of the concrete ties produced during this period. During the fourth quarter of 2012 and first quarter of 2013, the Company reached agreement with UPRR on several matters including a process for the Company and UPRR to work together to identify, prioritize, and replace defective ties that meet the criteria for replacement. This process applies to the ties the Company shipped to UPRR from its Grand Island, NE facility from 1998 to 2011. During most of this period, the Company’s warranty policy for UPRR carried a 5-year warranty with a 1.5:1 replacement ratio for any defective ties. In order to accommodate UPRR and other customer concerns, the Company also reverted to a previously used warranty policy providing a 15-year warranty with a 1:1 replacement ratio. This change provided an additional 10 years of warranty protection. In the amended 2005 supply agreement, the Company and UPRR also extended the supply of Tucson ties by five years and agreed on a cash payment of $12,000 to UPRR as compensation for concrete ties already replaced by UPRR during the investigation period.

During 2012, as a result of the testing that the Company conducted on concrete ties manufactured at its former Grand Island, NE facility and the developments related to UPRR and other customer matters, the Company recorded pre-tax warranty charges of $22,000 in “Cost of Goods Sold” within its Rail Products and Services segment based on the Company’s estimate of the number of defective concrete ties that will ultimately require replacement during the applicable warranty periods.

2013

Throughout 2013, at UPRR’s request and under the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement, the Company provided warranty replacement concrete ties for use across certain UPRR subdivisions. The Company attempted to reconcile the quantity of warranty claims for ties replaced and obtain supporting detail for the ties removed. The Company believes that UPRR did not replace concrete ties in accordance with the amended agreement and has not furnished adequate documentation throughout the replacement process in these subdivisions to support its full warranty claim. Based on the information received by the Company to date, the Company believes that a significant number of ties which UPRR replaced in these subdivisions did not meet the criteria to be covered as warranty replacement ties under the amended 2005 supply agreement. The disagreement related to the 2013 warranty replacement activity includes approximately 170,000 ties where the Company provided detailed documentation supporting our position with reason codes that detail why these ties are not eligible for a warranty claim.

21

In late November 2013, the Company received notice from UPRR asserting a material breach of the amended 2005 supply agreement. UPRR’s notice asserted that the failure to honor its claims for warranty ties in these subdivisions was a material breach. Following receipt of this notice, the Company provided information to UPRR to refute UPRR’s claim of breach and included the reconciliation of warranty claims supported by substantial findings from the Company’s track observation team, all within the 90-day cure period. The Company also proposed further discussions to reach agreement on reconciliation for 2013 replacement activities and future replacement activities and a recommended process that will ensure future replacement activities are done with appropriate documentation and per the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement.

2014

During the first quarter of 2014, the Company further responded within the 90-day cure period to UPRR’s claim and presented a reconciliation for the subdivisions at issue. This proposed reconciliation was based on empirical data and visual observation from Company employees that were present during the replacement process for a substantial majority of the concrete ties replaced. The Company spent considerable time documenting facts related to concrete tie condition and track condition to assess whether the ties replaced met the criteria to be eligible for replacement under the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement.

During 2014, the Company increased its accrual by an additional $8,766 based on revised estimates of ties to be replaced based upon scientific testing and other analysis, adjusted for ties already provided to UPRR. The Company continued to work with UPRR to identify, replace, and reconcile defective ties related to the warranty claim in accordance with the amended 2005 supply agreement. The Company and UPRR met during the third quarter of 2014 to evaluate each other’s position in an effort to work towards agreement on the unreconciled 2013 and 2014 replacement activity as well as the standards and practices to be implemented for future replacement activity and warranty tie replacement.

In November and December of 2014, the Company received additional notices from UPRR asserting that ties manufactured in 2000 were defective and again asserting material breaches of the amended 2005 supply agreement relating to warranty tie replacements as well as certain new ties provided to UPRR being out of specification.

At December 31, 2014, the Company and UPRR had not been able to reconcile the disagreement related to the 2013 and 2014 warranty replacement activity. The disagreement relating to the 2014 warranty replacement activity includes approximately 90,100 ties that the Company believes are not warranty-eligible.

2015

On January 23, 2015, UPRR filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial in the District Court for Douglas County, NE against the Company and its subsidiary, CXT, asserting, among other matters, that the Company breached its express warranty, breached an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and anticipatorily repudiated its warranty obligations, and that UPRR’s exclusive and limited remedy provisions in the supply agreement have failed of their essential purpose which entitles UPRR to recover all incidental and consequential damages. The Complaint seeks to cancel all duties of UPRR under the contract, to adjudge the Company as having no remaining rights under the contracts, and to recover damages in an amount to be determined at trial for the value of unfulfilled warranty replacement ties and ties likely to become warranty eligible, for costs of cover for replacement ties, and for various incidental and consequential damages. The amended 2005 supply agreement provides that UPRR’s exclusive remedy is to receive a replacement tie that meets the contract specifications for each tie that failed to meet the contract specifications or otherwise contained a material defect provided that the Company receives written notice of such failure or defect within 15 years after that tie was produced. The amended 2005 supply agreement provides that the Company’s warranty does not apply to ties that (a) have been repaired or altered without the Company’s written consent in such a way as to affect the stability or reliability thereof, (b) have been subject to misuse, negligence, or accident, or (c) have been improperly maintained or used contrary to the specifications for which such ties were produced. The amended 2005 supply agreement also continues to provide that the Company’s warranty is in lieu of all other express or implied warranties and that neither party shall be subject to or liable for any incidental or consequential damages to the other party. The dispute is largely based on (1) claims submitted that the Company believes are for ties claimed for warranty replacement that are inaccurately rated and are not the responsibility of the Company and claims that do not meet the criteria of a warranty replacement and (2) UPRR’s assertion, which the Company vigorously disputes, that UPRR in future years will be entitled to warranty replacement ties for virtually all of the Grand Island ties. Many thousands of Grand Island ties have been performing in track for over ten years. In addition, a significant amount of Grand Island ties were rated by both parties in the excellent category of the rating system.

In June 2015, UPRR delivered an additional notice alleging deficiencies in certain ties produced in the Company’s Tucson and Spokane locations and other claimed material breaches which the Company contends are unfounded. The Company again responded to UPRR that it was not in material breach of the amended 2005 supply agreement relating to warranty tie replacements and that the ties in question complied with the specifications provided by UPRR.

On June 16 and 17, 2015, UPRR issued formal notice of the termination of the concrete tie supply agreement as well as the termination of the lease agreement at the Tucson, AZ production facility and rejection and revocation of its prior acceptance of certain ties manufactured at the Company’s Spokane, WA production facility. Since that time, UPRR has discontinued submitting purchase orders to the Company for shipment of warranty replacement ties.

22

On May 29, 2015, the Company and CXT filed an Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims in response to the Complaint, denying liability to UPRR. As a result of UPRR’s subsequent June 16-17, 2015 actions and certain related conduct, the Company on October 5, 2015 amended the pending Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to add, among other things, assertions that UPRR’s conduct in question was wrongful and unjustified and constituted additional grounds for the affirmative defenses to UPRR’s claims and also for the Company’s counterclaims.

2016

By Scheduling Order dated June 29, 2016, an August 31, 2017 deadline for the completion of fact discovery has been established and trial may proceed at some future date after October 30, 2017, and UPRR has filed an amended notice of trial to commence on October 30, 2017. During the first nine months of 2016, the parties continued to conduct discovery. The Company intends to continue to engage in discussions in an effort to resolve the UPRR matter. However, we cannot predict that such discussions will be successful, or that the results of the litigation with UPRR, or any settlement or judgment amounts, will reasonably approximate our estimated accruals for loss contingencies. Future potential costs pertaining to UPRR’s claims and the outcome of the UPRR litigation could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

As a result of the preliminary status of the litigation and the uncertainty of any potential judgment, an estimate of any additional loss, or a range of loss, associated with this litigation cannot be made based upon currently available information.

Environmental and Legal Proceedings

In September 2015, the Company was notified of a collective action complaint by current and former test and inspection services employees to recover unpaid overtime wages and other damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties commenced court ordered mediation on October 17, 2016. The Company has engaged a third party specialist to assist in claim valuation, but the parties have not engaged in any discovery to date, and there is no certainty of a potential resolution at this time. An estimate of any range of potential loss associated with this claim cannot be made based upon currently available information.

The Company is subject to national, state, foreign, provincial, and/or local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The Company’s efforts to comply with environmental regulations may have an adverse effect on its future earnings. In the opinion of management, compliance with the present environmental protection laws will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, competitive position, or capital expenditures of the Company.

At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company maintained environmental reserves approximating $6,587 and $6,640, respectively. The following table sets forth the Company’s environmental obligation:

	Environmental liability
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	6,640
Additions to environmental obligations		26
Environmental obligations utilized		(79	)
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	6,587

The Company is also subject to other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. The amounts currently reserved are immaterial to our financial position and liquidity and the estimate of additional loss exposure is immaterial to our results of operations.

15. INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective income tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 36.1% and 29.5%, respectively, and 18.2% and 14.3% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate for the 2016 periods differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the discrete impact of current year asset impairments. The Company’s asset impairments of $6,946 and $135,884 for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, respectively, were related to both tax deductible and nondeductible assets and resulted in income tax benefits of $1,000 and $39,038, respectively.

23

16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Due to the continued weakness in the markets that we serve, during the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company estimates severance charges of approximately $1,000 will be recorded related to reduction in force activity as the Company continues to react to changes in market conditions.

On November 7, 2016, L. B. Foster Company (the “Company”), its domestic subsidiaries, and certain of its Canadian subsidiaries entered into the Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015 and as amended by the First Amendment dated June 29, 2016 (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”), with PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company. This Second Amendment modifies the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement which had a maximum revolving credit line of $275,000. The Second Amendment reduces the permitted revolving credit borrowings to $195,000 and provides for additional term loan borrowing of up to $30,000. The term loan will be subject to quarterly straight line amortization until fully paid off upon the final payment on January 1, 2020. Furthermore, certain matters, including excess cash flow, asset sales, and equity issuances, trigger mandatory prepayments to the Term Loan. Term loan borrowings will not be available to draw upon once they have been repaid. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Second Amendment or Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as applicable.

The Second Amendment further provides for modifications to the financial covenants as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Second Amendment calls for the elimination of the Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant through the quarter ended June 30, 2018. After that period, the Maximum Gross Leverage Ratio covenant will be reinstated to require a maximum ratio of 4.25 Consolidated Indebtedness to 1.00 Gross Leverage for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, and 3.75 to 1.00 for all periods thereafter until the maturity date of the credit facility. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Last Twelve Months EBITDA covenant (“Minimum EBITDA”). For the quarter ending December 31, 2016 through the quarter ending June 30, 2017, the Minimum EBITDA must be at least $18,500. For each quarter thereafter, through the quarter ended June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will increase by various increments. At June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will be $31,000. After the quarter ended June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA covenant will be eliminated through the maturity of the credit agreement. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant. The covenant represents the ratio of the Company’s fixed charges to the last twelve months of EBITDA, and is required to be a minimum of 1.00 to 1.00 through the quarter ended December 31, 2017 and 1.25 to 1.00 for each quarter thereafter through the maturity of the credit facility. The final financial covenant included in the Second Amendment is a Minimum Liquidity covenant which calls for a minimum of $25,000 in undrawn availability on the revolving credit loan at all times through the quarter ended June 30, 2018.

The Second Amendment includes several changes to certain non-financial covenants as defined in the Credit Agreement. Through the maturity date of the loan, the Company is now prohibited from making any future acquisitions. The limitation on permitted annual distributions of dividends or redemptions of the Company’s stock has been decreased from $4,000 to $1,700. The aggregate limitation on loans to and investments in non-loan parties was decreased from $10,000 to $5,000. Furthermore, the limitation on asset sales has been decreased from $25,000 annually with a carryover of up to $15,000 from the prior year to $25,000 in the aggregate through the maturity date of the credit facility.

The Second Amendment provides for the elimination of the three lowest tiers of the pricing grid that had previously been defined in the First Amendment. Upon execution of the Second Amendment through the quarter ended March 31, 2018, the Company will be locked into the highest tier of the pricing grid which provides for pricing of the prime rate plus 225 basis points on base rate loans and the applicable LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points on euro rate loans. For each quarter after March 31, 2018 and through the maturity date of the credit facility, the Company’s position on the pricing grid will be governed by a Minimum Net Leverage ratio which is the ratio of Consolidated Indebtedness less cash on hand in excess of $15,000 to EBITDA. If, after March 31, 2018 the Minimum Net Leverage ratio positions the Company on the lowest tier of the pricing grid, pricing will be the prime rate plus 150 basis points on base rate loans or the applicable LIBOR rate plus 250 basis points on euro rate loans.

The Company anticipates a fourth quarter 2016 charge of approximately $500 related to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees as a result of the amendment.

Lastly, on November 7, 2016, the Company announced that its Board of Directors decided to suspend the quarterly dividend beginning in the fourth quarter 2016.

Management evaluated all other activity of the Company and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements or further disclosure in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

24

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Many of the forward-looking statements are located in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Sentences containing words such as “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “expect,” “should,” “could,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “predict,” “project,” or their negatives, or other similar expressions generally should be considered forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may concern, among other things, L.B. Foster Company’s (“the Company’s”) expectations relating to our strategy, goals, projections and plans regarding our financial position, liquidity, capital resources and results of operations, the outcome of litigation and product warranty claims, decisions regarding our strategic growth initiatives, market position, and product development, all of which are based on current estimates that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. The Company cautions readers that various factors could cause the actual results of the Company to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements. Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. Among the factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements are risks and uncertainties related to: an economic slowdown or a continuation of the current economic slowdown in the markets we serve, the risk of doing business in international markets, a decrease in freight or passenger rail traffic, continued and sustained declines in energy prices, a lack of state or federal funding for new infrastructure projects, an increase in manufacturing or material costs, our ability to effectuate our strategy including evaluating potential opportunities such as strategic acquisitions, joint ventures, and other initiatives, and our ability to effectively integrate new businesses and realize anticipated benefits, costs of and impacts associated with shareholder activism, the timeliness and availability of material from major suppliers, labor disputes, the impact of competition, the effective implementation of an enterprise resource planning system, variances in current accounting estimates and assumptions and their ultimate outcomes, the seasonality of the Company’s business, the adequacy of internal and external sources of funds to meet financing needs, the Company’s ability to curb its working capital requirements and manage indebtedness, domestic and international income taxes, foreign currency fluctuations, inflation, economic conditions and regulatory changes caused by the United Kingdom’s likely exit from the European Union, the ultimate number of concrete ties that will have to be replaced pursuant to product warranty claims, an overall resolution of the related contract claims, the costs associated with and the outcome of a lawsuit filed by Union Pacific Railroad (“UPRR”), the loss of future revenues from current customers, risks inherent in litigation, and domestic and foreign governmental regulations. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements prove incorrect, actual outcomes could vary materially from those indicated. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, and results of the Company’s business and forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those set forth under Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The forward-looking statements in this report are made as of the date of this report and we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise, except as required by securities laws.

General Overview

L.B. Foster Company (“Company”) is a leading manufacturer, fabricator, and distributor of products and services for rail, construction, energy, and utility markets. The Company is comprised of three business segments: Rail Products and Services, Construction Products, and Tubular and Energy Services.

Quarter-to-date Results

The segment gross profit measures presented within the MD&A tables constitute non-GAAP financial measures disclosed by management to provide investors and other users information to evaluate the performance of the Company’s segments on a more comparable basis to market trends and peers. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures are key metrics utilized by segment managers to monitor selling prices and quantities as well as production and service costs to better evaluate key profitability drivers and trends that may develop due to industry and competitive conditions.

25

The following non-GAAP reconciliation of segment gross profit displays items that have been excluded from segment profit (loss) as disclosed in Note 2 to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented above:

Three months ended September 30, 2016	Rail Products and Services			Construction Products		Tubular and Energy Services			Total
Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit	$	12,220		$	6,177	$	654		$	19,051
Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative		8,926			4,783		4,290			17,999
Amortization Expense		958			38		767			1,763
Asset Impairments		4,383			—		2,563			6,946
Reportable Segment Profit (Loss)	$	(2,047	)	$	1,356	$	(6,966	)	$	(7,657	)
Three months ended September 30, 2015	Rail Products and Services			Construction Products		Tubular and Energy Services			Total
Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit	$	19,564		$	9,850	$	6,689		$	36,103
Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative		11,510			5,356		3,996			20,862
Amortization Expense		1,070			38		2,229			3,337
Asset Impairments		—			—		80,337			80,337
Reportable Segment Profit (Loss)	$	6,984		$	4,456	$	(79,873	)	$	(68,433	)

							Percent of Total Net Sales						Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales:
Rail Products and Services	$	56,891		$	87,972			49.6	%		50.0	%		(35.3	)%
Construction Products		34,870			54,093			30.4			30.7			(35.5	)
Tubular and Energy Services		22,883			33,994			20.0			19.3			(32.7	)
Total net sales	$	114,644		$	176,059			100.0	%		100.0	%		(34.9	)%
							Non-GAAP / Reported Gross Profit Percentage						Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Gross Profit:
Non-GAAP Rail Products and Services	$	12,220		$	19,564			21.5	%		22.2	%		(37.5	)%
Non-GAAP Construction Products		6,177			9,850			17.7			18.2			(37.3	)
Non-GAAP Tubular and Energy Services		654			6,689			2.9			19.7			(90.2	)
Non-GAAP Segment gross profit		19,051			36,103
LIFO income		917			181			0.8			0.1			*	*
Other		(165	)		(246	)		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(32.9	)
Total gross profit	$	19,803		$	36,038			17.3	%		20.5	%		(45.0	)%
							Percent of Total Net						Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	Three Months Ended						Sales Three Months
	September 30,						Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Expenses:
Selling and administrative expenses	$	19,807		$	21,605			17.3	%		12.3	%		(8.3	)%
Amortization expense		1,763			3,337			1.5			1.9			(47.2	)
Asset impairments		6,946			80,337			6.1			45.6			(91.4	)
Interest expense		1,520			1,265			1.3			0.7			20.2
Interest income		(50	)		(66	)		—			—			(24.2	)
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments		263			299			0.2			0.2			(12.0	)
Other income		(1,085	)		(537	)		(0.9	)		(0.3	)		102.0
Total expenses	$	29,164		$	106,240			25.4	%		60.3	%		(72.5	)%
Loss before income taxes	$	(9,361	)	$	(70,202	)		(8.2	)%		(39.9	)%		(86.7	)%
Income tax benefit		(3,379	)		(12,780	)		(2.9	)		(7.3	)		(73.6	)
Net loss	$	(5,982	)	$	(57,422	)		(5.3	)%		(32.6	)%		(89.6	)%

** Results of calculation are not considered meaningful for presentation purposes.

26

Third Quarter 2016 Compared to Third Quarter 2015 – Company Analysis

Net sales of $114,644 for the period ended September 30, 2016 decreased by $61,415, or 34.9%, compared to the prior year quarter. The change was attributable to decreases of 35.5%, 35.3%, and 32.7% in Construction Products, Rail Products and Services, and Tubular and Energy Services segment sales, respectively.

Gross profit percentage for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 was 17.3% or 320 basis points lower than the prior year quarter. The decrease was primarily due to significantly lower margins within the Tubular and Energy Services segment. Partially offsetting the decline were favorable reductions in LIFO reserves as a result of decreasing prices along with inventory reductions.

Selling and administrative expenses decreased by $1,798, or 8.3%, from the prior year. The decrease was primarily driven by $830 in cost reduction initiatives related to personnel and travel costs, $700 related to incentive compensation, $320 related to prior year acquisition and integration costs and other strategic spending reductions of approximately $850. These reductions were partially offset by $640 of increased litigation-related costs for the UPRR matter and, to a lesser extent, increased costs related to the implementation of the Company’s enterprise resource planning system.

The Company recorded non-cash impairments of $6,946 ($5,946 net of tax) during the three-month period ended September 30, 2016. The impairment related to the finalization of the June 1, 2016 interim impairment assessment. The third quarter adjustments related to a $4,383 goodwill impairment and a $2,563 definite-lived asset impairment for the Rail Technologies and Chemtec reporting units, respectively. During the three-month period ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized asset impairments of $80,337 ($63,887 net of taxes) to write down the carrying values to the implied fair values, of which $69,908 represented the full carrying value of goodwill related to the IOS acquisition and the remaining $10,429 related to the Chemtec reporting unit.

Amortization expense decreased by $1,574, or 47.2%, which was attributable to the current year intangible asset impairment, which reduced definite-lived intangible amortization costs.

The Company’s effective income tax rate in the 2016 third quarter was 36.1%, compared to 18.2% in the prior year quarter. The Company’s effective income tax rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the discrete impact of asset impairments, offset by changes in the Company’s forecasted global mix of income. The Company’s asset impairments of $6,946 and $80,337 in the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were related to both tax deductible and nondeductible assets and resulted in income tax benefits of $1,000 and $16,450, respectively.

Net loss for the third quarter of 2016 was $5,982, or $0.58 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $57,422, or $5.60 per diluted share, in the prior year quarter. The following table provides a reconciliation of the GAAP earnings per share value to the non-GAAP adjusted earnings¹ per share value for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2016			2015
Adjusted Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share Reconciliation
Net loss, as reported	$	(5,982	)	$	(57,422	)
Asset impairments, net of tax benefits of $1,000 and $16,450		5,946			63,887
Adjusted net (loss) income		(36	)		6,465
Average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted, as reported		10,296			10,256
Average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted, as adjusted		10,296			10,304
Diluted loss per common share, as reported	$	(0.58	)	$	(5.60	)
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share, as adjusted	$	(0.00	)	$	0.63

¹ - All results in this Quarterly Report that exclude asset impairment charges are non-GAAP measures used for management reporting purposes. Management believes that these measures provide useful information to investors because they will assist investors in evaluating earnings performance on a comparable year-over-year basis.

27

Results of Operations – Segment Analysis

Rail Products and Services

	Three Months Ended									Percent
	September 30,						Decrease			Decrease
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales	$	56,891		$	87,972		$	(31,081	)		(35.3	)%
Non-GAAP Gross Profit	$	12,220		$	19,564		$	(7,344	)		(37.5	)%
Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage		21.5	%		22.2	%		(0.7	)%		(3.2	)%

Third Quarter 2016 Compared to Third Quarter 2015

Rail Products and Services segment sales decreased $31,081 or 35.3%, compared to the prior year period. The decline related to reductions across all of our rail divisions. The sales declines were primarily volume driven due to significantly less infrastructure and maintenance spending. The rail market continues to experience reductions in commodity carloadings and intermodal rail traffic among the Class 1 railroads. This negative trend is expected to continue throughout the remainder of the year.

The Rail Products and Services segment produced a loss of $2,047 compared to the prior year period profit of $6,984. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $4,383 goodwill impairment related to the Rail Technologies reporting unit along with reductions in gross profit due to depressed volumes. Non-GAAP gross profit declined by $7,344, or 37.5%, compared to the prior year period. The decline in profitability was primarily attributable to volume related deleveraging within track components and friction management products.

During the quarter, the Rail Products and Services segment had a reduction in new orders of 22.5% compared to the prior year period. Nearly half of the decline related to the rail distribution division and the remainder consisted of all other rail product lines experiencing reductions in orders relative to the prior year quarter. The Company anticipates continued challenges as rail customers react to significantly reduced rail traffic.

Construction Products

	Three Months Ended						Decrease			Percent          Decrease
	September 30,
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales	$	34,870		$	54,093		$	(19,223	)		(35.5	)%
Non-GAAP Gross Profit	$	6,177		$	9,850		$	(3,673	)		(37.3	)%
Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage		17.7	%		18.2	%		(0.5	)%		(2.7	)%

Third Quarter 2016 Compared to Third Quarter 2015

Construction Products segment sales decreased $19,223, or 35.5%, compared to the prior year period. The reduction relates to weaker sales within piling and bridge products, partially offset by increased sales of precast concrete products. The piling products division continues to experience increased competition, which has led to a deterioration in demand and related sales volumes. The fabricated bridge division anticipates stronger sales during the fourth quarter as projects awarded during the second quarter 2016 will become realized.

The Construction Products segment profit declined by $3,100 which was primarily attributable to the reduction in sales volumes which negatively impacted non-GAAP gross profit. Non-GAAP gross profit was weaker in all divisions and related to sales volume reductions in the current year period.

During the quarter, the Construction Products segment’s orders were consistent with the prior year period.

28

Tubular and Energy Services

	Three Months Ended									Percent
	September 30,						Decrease			Decrease
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales	$	22,883		$	33,994		$	(11,111	)		(32.7	)%
Non-GAAP Gross Profit	$	654		$	6,689		$	(6,035	)		(90.2	)%
Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage		2.9	%		19.7	%		(16.8	)%		(85.3	)%

Third Quarter 2016 Compared to Third Quarter 2015

Tubular and Energy Services segment sales decreased $11,111, or 32.7%, compared to the prior year period. The decrease related primarily to $8,382 from the threaded and coated divisions and $6,225 from test and inspection services partially offset by an increase of $3,585 related to precision measurement products.

Tubular and Energy Services segment loss was $6,966 compared to a loss of $79,873 in the prior year. The losses were largely attributable to impairments of $2,563 and $80,337 for the three-month periods ending September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The non-GAAP gross profit declined by $6,035, or 90.2%, which was negatively impacted by our test and inspection and coated services offerings. The test and inspection services business continues to be negatively impacted by the weakness in the upstream oil and gas market, where demand levels remain low, leading to heightened competition and reductions in service prices. Similarly, coated pipe demand levels have declined significantly during the third quarter 2016 which led to a temporary idling of the Birmingham facility. The facility has restarted operations in early October 2016. Gross profit was also negatively impacted by precision measurement system sales which produced lower margins due to competitive pressures as a result of the depressed midstream oil and gas market. Profitability in the Tubular and Energy Services segment will be challenging for the remainder of the year.

The Tubular and Energy Services segment had a reduction in new orders of 52.2% compared to the prior year period. Orders for coated products, test and inspection services and precision measurement systems were down 64.8%, 55.1%, and 37.0% respectively, due to a reduction in midstream oil and gas new project lettings.

Year-to-date Results

The segment gross profit measures presented within the MD&A tables constitute non-GAAP financial measures disclosed by management to provide investors and other users information to evaluate the performance of the Company’s segments on a more comparable basis to market trends and peers. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures are key metrics utilized by segment managers to monitor selling prices and quantities as well as production and service costs to better evaluate key profitability drivers and trends that may develop due to industry and competitive conditions.

29

The following non-GAAP reconciliations of segment gross profit displays items that have been excluded from segment profit (loss) as disclosed in Note 2:

Nine months ended September 30, 2016	Rail Products and Services			Construction Products		Tubular and Energy Services			Total
Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit	$	41,051		$	20,642	$	8,933		$	70,626
Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative		31,854			14,781		12,891			59,526
Amortization Expense		2,946			113		4,759			7,818
Asset Impairments		32,725			—		103,159			135,884
Reportable Segment Profit (Loss)	$	(26,474	)	$	5,748	$	(111,876	)	$	(132,602	)
Nine months ended September 30, 2015	Rail Products and Services			Construction Products		Tubular and Energy Services			Total
Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit	$	57,418		$	26,707	$	19,617		$	103,742
Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative		34,944			15,660		11,097			61,701
Amortization Expense		3,005			205		5,740			8,950
Asset Impairments		—			—		80,337			80,337
Reportable Segment Profit (Loss)	$	19,469		$	10,842	$	(77,557	)	$	(47,246	)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Percent of Total Net Sales Nine Months Ended September 30,						Percent Increase/(Decrease)
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales:
Rail Products and Services	$	188,686		$	252,530			50.1	%		52.0	%		(25.3	)%
Construction Products		107,098			137,899			28.4			28.4			(22.3	)
Tubular and Energy Services		81,164			94,956			21.5			19.6			(14.5	)
Total net sales	$	376,948		$	485,385			100.0	%		100.0	%		(22.3	)%
	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Non-GAAP / Reported Gross Profit Percentage Nine Months Ended September 30,						Percent Increase/(Decrease)
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Gross Profit:
Non-GAAP Rail Products and Services	$	41,051		$	57,418			21.8	%		22.7	%		(28.5	)%
Non-GAAP Construction Products		20,642			26,707			19.3			19.4			(22.7	)
Non-GAAP Tubular and Energy Services		8,933			19,617			11.0			20.7			(54.5	)
Non-GAAP Segment gross profit		70,626			103,742
LIFO income		1,442			581			0.4			0.1			148.2
Other		(492	)		(542	)		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(9.2	)
Total gross profit	$	71,576		$	103,781			19.0	%		21.4	%		(31.0	)%
	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Percent of Total Net Sales Nine Months Ended September 30,						Percent Increase/(Decrease)
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015
Expenses:
Selling and administrative expenses	$	65,941		$	68,133			17.5	%		14.0	%		(3.2	)%
Amortization expense		7,818			8,950			2.1			1.8			(12.6	)
Asset impairments		135,884			80,337			36.0			16.6			69.1
Interest expense		4,342			3,166			1.2			0.7			37.1
Interest income		(157	)		(160	)		—			—			(1.9	)
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments		946			312			0.3			0.1			*	*
Other income		(263	)		(1,245	)		(0.1	)		(0.3	)		(78.9	)
Total expenses	$	214,511		$	159,493			56.9	%		32.9	%		34.5	%
Loss before income taxes	$	(142,935	)	$	(55,712	)		(37.9	) %		(11.5	) %		156.6	%
Income tax benefit		(42,125	)		(7,939	)		(11.2	)		(1.6	)		*	*
Net loss	$	(100,810	)	$	(47,773	)		(26.7	) %		(9.9	) %		111.0	%

** Results of calculation are not considered meaningful for presentation purposes.

30

First Nine Months of 2016 Compared to First Nine Months of 2015 – Company Analysis

Net sales of $376,948 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased by $108,437, or 22.3%, compared to the prior year period. The sales decrease was attributable to decreases of 25.3%, 22.3%, and 14.5% in Rail Products and Services, Construction Products and Tubular and Energy Services segment sales, respectively.

Gross profit percentage for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 19.0%, or 240 basis points lower than the prior year. The current year margin was significantly impacted by the prolonged weakness in the oil and gas market and, to a lesser extent, reduced activity within the rail market. Partially offsetting the decline were favorable reductions in LIFO reserves as a result of decreasing prices along with inventory reductions.

Selling and administrative expenses decreased by $2,192 over the prior year period. The reduction was primarily attributable to cost reduction initiatives related to personnel costs of $1,100, incentive compensation reductions of $1,700, prior year acquisition and integration costs of $1,000 and other strategic spending reductions of $1,660 which were partially offset by $2,400 in litigation-related costs for the UPRR matter and, to a lesser extent, costs related to the implementation of the Company’s enterprise resource planning system.

The Company recorded non-cash asset impairments of $135,884 ($96,846 net of tax) during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016. During the 2015 period, the Company recognized asset impairments of $80,337 ($63,887 net of taxes) to write down the carrying values to the implied fair values, of which $69,908 represented the full carrying value of goodwill related to the IOS acquisition and the remaining $10,429 related to the Chemtec reporting unit.

During the second quarter of 2016, the Company identified various indicators that suggested that there was a more likely than not probability that the carrying values of certain assets and reporting units were less than their respective fair values. The impairment indicators included a rapid deterioration in actual performance against forecasts, downward revisions in projected financial results, declines in the Company’s market capitalization, and reductions in new order activity.

Asset groups that had indicators of impairment were analyzed to determine if the carrying values were recoverable. Based upon the recoverability assessment, the Company determined that certain intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment within the test and inspection services division and certain intangible assets within the Chemtec division were impaired. The impairment assessment was finalized during the period ended September 30, 2016 resulting in a $59,786 definite-lived intangible asset impairment and a $14,956 property, plant, and equipment impairment were recorded within the Tubular and Energy Services segment. The remaining asset groups tested for recoverability were substantially in excess of their respective carrying values.

The Company performed an interim goodwill impairment review as of June 1, 2016 as a result of the adverse effect on certain reporting units of reduced capital spending and cost reduction priorities that oil and gas developers and railroad customers have enacted as well as the indicators previously noted. The forecasts for the Chemtec, coated services, and Rail Technologies reporting units did not indicate a timely recovery to support the carrying values of the reporting units. Upon finalization of the interim impairment assessment during the period ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized a goodwill impairment of $61,142, which represented the full impairment of goodwill related to the Chemtec and coated services reporting units and approximately 68% of the Rail Technologies goodwill value. The estimated fair values of the remaining reporting units were substantially in excess of the carrying value of those reporting units.

The Company’s effective income tax rate from continuing operations for the first nine months of 2016 was 29.5%, compared to 14.3% in the prior year period. The Company’s effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the discrete impact of asset impairments in the current year period. The Company’s asset impairments of $135,884 and $80,337 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were related to both tax deductible and nondeductible assets and resulted in income tax benefits of $39,038 and $16,450, respectively.

31

Net loss for the first nine months of 2016 was $100,810, or $9.82 per diluted share, which compares to a net loss for the 2015 period of $47,773, or $4.65 per diluted share. The following table provides a reconciliation of the GAAP earnings per share value to the non-GAAP adjusted earnings per share value for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015
Adjusted Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share Reconciliation
Net loss, as reported	$	(100,810	)	$	(47,773	)
Asset impairments, net of tax benefits of $39,038 and $16,450		96,846			63,887
Adjusted net (loss) income		(3,964	)		16,114
Average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted, as reported		10,264			10,266
Average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted, as adjusted		10,264			10,347
Diluted loss per common share, as reported	$	(9.82	)	$	(4.65	)
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share, as adjusted	$	(0.39	)	$	1.56

Results of Operations – Segment Analysis

Rail Products and Services

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Decrease			Percent         Decrease
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales	$	188,686		$	252,530		$	(63,844	)		(25.3	)%
Non-GAAP Gross Profit	$	41,051		$	57,418		$	(16,367	)		(28.5	)%
Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage		21.8	%		22.7	%		(0.9	)%		(4.0	)%

First Nine Months of 2016 Compared to First Nine Months of 2015

Rail Products and Services segment sales decreased $63,844, or 25.3%, compared to the prior year period. For the first nine months of 2016, all rail divisions experienced reductions in sales over the prior year period. The sales decline was attributable to lower volumes due to continued weakness in the North American rail market in both commodity carloads as well as intermodal rail traffic. Additionally, due to the ongoing litigation with UPRR, our rail divisions experienced a decline in sales to UPRR of approximately $12,500.

The Rail Products and Services segment loss for the nine-months ended September 30, 2016 was $26,474 compared to segment profit of $19,469 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The reduction was primarily attributable to the $32,725 goodwill impairment related to the Rail Technologies reporting unit along with reductions in gross profit due to the reduction in sales volumes. The non-GAAP gross profit decreased by $16,367, or 28.5%, and the corresponding percentage decreased by 90 basis points principally attributable to declines in Rail Technologies and precast concrete tie margins, which was negatively impacted by reduced volumes and related deleveraging of the businesses.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, the Rail Products and Services segment had a reduction in new orders of 28.5% compared to the prior year. The rail distribution and precast concrete tie businesses represented 60.9% of the current year decline and all other rail divisions experienced declines relative to the prior year due to reductions in rail capital spending. The Company anticipates continuing challenges as rail customers react to significantly reduced rail traffic.

32

Construction Products

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Decrease			Percent Decrease
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales	$	107,098		$	137,899		$	(30,801	)		(22.3	)%
Non-GAAP Gross Profit	$	20,642		$	26,707		$	(6,065	)		(22.7	)%
Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage		19.3	%		19.4	%		(0.1	)%		(0.5	)%

First Nine Months of 2016 Compared to First Nine Months of 2015

Construction Products segment sales decreased $30,801, or 22.3%, compared to the prior year period. The piling division represented $24,672 of the reduction and fabricated bridge sales represented $8,036, which were both attributable to fewer large project opportunities in the market as compared to the prior year period as well as increased competition leading to fewer project wins. Partially offsetting these declines were increased precast concrete product sales.

The Construction Products segment profit of $5,748 declined by $5,094 compared to the prior year as a result of reduced gross profit attributable to lower sales volumes. The non-GAAP gross profit decreased by $6,065, or 22.7%, due to reductions in piling products gross profit as a result of the decline in volumes. The fabricated bridge and precast concrete products partially offset the reduction in piling products’ profit margins.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, the Construction Products segment had a 1.3% increase in new orders compared to the prior year period. The increase relates to significant project wins within the fabricated bridge business, which were largely offset by declines in the piling products business.

Tubular and Energy Services

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Decrease			Percent Decrease
	2016			2015			2016 vs. 2015			2016 vs. 2015
Net Sales	$	81,164		$	94,956		$	(13,792	)		(14.5	)%
Non-GAAP Gross Profit	$	8,933		$	19,617		$	(10,684	)		(54.5	)%
Non-GAAP Gross Profit Percentage		11.0	%		20.7	%		(9.7	)%		(46.9	)%

First Nine Months of 2016 Compared to First Nine Months of 2015

Tubular and Energy Services segment sales decreased $13,792, or 14.5%, compared to the prior year period. The decrease primarily relates to the test and inspection services division, which is being significantly impacted by the upstream oil and gas market and related reduction in active land rigs. Sales of coated services have declined by 25.5% due to reduced demand levels within the midstream oil and gas market.

For the nine-months ended September 30, 2016, the segment loss was $111,871 compared to segment loss of $77,557 during the prior year period. The losses in both periods were largely attributable to asset impairments of $103,159 and $80,337, respectively. The current year impairments related to the test and inspection services, precision measurement products, and coated services reporting units. Segment profit was also negatively impacted by reductions in gross profit due to continued declines in test and inspection services sales volumes. The non-GAAP gross profit declined by $10,684, or 54.5%, and the corresponding percentage declined by 970 basis points compared to the prior year period. Sales of precision measurement products have increased during the current year, however, due to the increased competition on fewer opportunities, the profitability has been reduced.

The Tubular and Energy Services segment’s new orders decreased by 36.8% compared to the prior year period. Coated services and test and inspection services experienced the most significant reductions at 67.5% and 49.3%, respectively. While the test and inspection services division continues to be impacted by the weakness in the oil and gas market, the recent coated decline relates to the delayed impact of the oil and gas market on mid-stream customers. Management anticipates that the Tubular and Energy Services segment will continue to face significant headwinds throughout the remainder of 2016.

33

Other

Segment Backlog

Total Company backlog is summarized by business segment in the following table for the periods indicated:

	Backlog
	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		September 30, 2015
Rail Products and Services	$	53,392	$	85,199	$	84,787
Construction Products		75,762		45,371		63,311
Tubular and Energy Services		14,650		34,137		26,242
Total Backlog	$	143,804	$	164,707	$	174,340

While a considerable portion of our business is backlog driven, certain product lines within the Rail Products and Services and Tubular and Energy Services segments are not driven by backlog and therefore have insignificant levels throughout the year.

Warranty

At September 30, 2016, the Company maintained a total product warranty reserve of $9,034 for its estimate of all potential product warranty claims. Of this total, $7,460 reflects the current estimate of the Company’s exposure for potential product warranty claims related to concrete tie production. While the Company believes this is a reasonable estimate of its potential contingencies related to identified concrete tie warranty matters, the Company may incur future charges associated with new customer claims or further development of information for existing customer claims. Thus, there can be no assurance that future potential costs pertaining to warranty claims will not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. See Note 14 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Total debt was $135,625 and $168,754 at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Our need for liquidity relates primarily to working capital requirements for operations, capital expenditures, joint venture capital obligations, debt service obligations, share repurchases, and dividends.

The change in cash and cash equivalents for year-to-date periods ended September 30 is as follows:

	September 30,
	2016			2015
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	11,876		$	13,688
Net cash used by investing activities		(6,219	)		(205,161	)
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities		(35,470	)		175,744
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		152			(3,085	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(29,661	)	$	(18,814	)

Cash Flow from Operating Activities

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, cash flows provided by operating activities were $11,876 compared to $13,688 during the prior year period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, income, adjustments to income from operating activities, and dividends from the LB Pipe joint venture provided $15,976 compared to $36,446 in the 2015 period. Working capital and other assets and liabilities used $4,100 in the current period compared to a use of $22,758 in the prior year period.

The Company’s calculation of days sales outstanding at September 30, 2016 was 53 days compared to 56 days at December 31, 2015. We believe our receivables portfolio is strong.

34

Cash Flow from Investing Activities

Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were $6,507 and $11,618, respectively. The current year expenditures related primarily to the Birmingham, AL inside diameter coating line upgrade and application development of the Company’s new enterprise resource planning system. The Company also received proceeds of $923 related to the sale of assets and also loaned $635 to its LB Pipe JV. Expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 related primarily to upgrades to the outside diameter coating line of the Birmingham, AL coating facility as well as general plant and yard improvements across each segment. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company acquired Tew Holdings, LTD. (“Tew”) and IOS. The total purchase price of these acquisitions, net of cash acquired, was $193,871 as of September 30, 2015.

Cash Flow from Financing Activities

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company had a decrease in outstanding debt of approximately $33,130, primarily related to short-term loans from foreign subsidiaries to make payments against the revolving credit facility. The advances were repaid during the first week of October 2016. The Company also paid $712 in financing fees for the June 29, 2016 credit facility amendment. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company had an increase in outstanding debt of approximately $180,990, primarily related to drawings against the revolving credit facility to fund domestic acquisition activity. The Company withheld 14,498 shares for approximately $198 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016 compared to withholding 24,012 shares for approximately $1,099 in the prior year period. The shares were withheld from employees to pay their withholding taxes in connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards. Cash outflows related to dividends were $1,244 in each of the periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Lastly, during the nine-month periods ending September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company purchased 5,000 and 80,512 shares of common stock for $67 and $1,587, respectively, under our existing share repurchase authorization.

Financial Condition

On November 7, 2016, L. B. Foster Company (the “Company”), its domestic subsidiaries, and certain of its Canadian subsidiaries entered into the Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015 and as amended by the First Amendment dated June 29, 2016 (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”), with PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company. This Second Amendment modifies the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement which had a maximum revolving credit line of $275,000. The Second Amendment reduces the permitted revolving credit borrowings to $195,000 and provides for additional term loan borrowing of up to $30,000. The term loan will be subject to quarterly straight line amortization until fully paid off upon the final payment on January 1, 2020. Furthermore, certain matters, including excess cash flow, asset sales, and equity issuances, trigger mandatory prepayments to the Term Loan. Term loan borrowings will not be available to draw upon once they have been repaid. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Second Amendment or Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as applicable.

The Second Amendment further provides for modifications to the financial covenants as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Second Amendment calls for the elimination of the Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant through the quarter ended June 30, 2018. After that period, the Maximum Gross Leverage Ratio covenant will be reinstated to require a maximum ratio of 4.25 Consolidated Indebtedness to 1.00 Gross Leverage for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, and 3.75 to 1.00 for all periods thereafter until the maturity date of the credit facility. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Last Twelve Months EBITDA covenant (“Minimum EBITDA”). For the quarter ending December 31, 2016 through the quarter ending June 30, 2017, the Minimum EBITDA must be at least $18,500. For each quarter thereafter, through the quarter ended June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will increase by various increments. At June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will be $31,000. After the quarter ended June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA covenant will be eliminated through the maturity of the credit agreement. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant. The covenant represents the ratio of the Company’s fixed charges to the last twelve months of EBITDA, and is required to be a minimum of 1.00 to 1.00 through the quarter ended December 31, 2017 and 1.25 to 1.00 for each quarter thereafter through the maturity of the credit facility. The final financial covenant included in the Second Amendment is a Minimum Liquidity covenant which calls for a minimum of $25,000 in undrawn availability on the revolving credit loan at all times through the quarter ended June 30, 2018.

The Second Amendment includes several changes to certain non-financial covenants as defined in the Credit Agreement. Through the maturity date of the loan, the Company is now prohibited from making any future acquisitions. The limitation on permitted annual distributions of dividends or redemptions of the Company’s stock has been decreased from $4,000 to $1,700. The aggregate limitation on loans to and investments in non-loan parties was decreased from $10,000 to $5,000. Furthermore, the limitation on asset sales has been decreased from $25,000 annually with a carryover of up to $15,000 from the prior year to $25,000 in the aggregate through the maturity date of the credit facility.

35

The Second Amendment provides for the elimination of the three lowest tiers of the pricing grid that had previously been defined in the First Amendment. Upon execution of the Second Amendment through the quarter ended March 31, 2018, the Company will be locked into the highest tier of the pricing grid which provides for pricing of the prime rate plus 225 basis points on base rate loans and the applicable LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points on euro rate loans. For each quarter after March 31, 2018 and through the maturity date of the credit facility, the Company’s position on the pricing grid will be governed by a Minimum Net Leverage ratio which is the ratio of Consolidated Indebtedness less cash on hand in excess of $15,000 to EBITDA. If, after March 31, 2018 the Minimum Net Leverage ratio positions the Company on the lowest tier of the pricing grid, pricing will be the prime rate plus 150 basis points on base rate loans or the applicable LIBOR rate plus 250 basis points on euro rate loans.

At September 30, 2016, we had $3,651 in cash and cash equivalents and $141,728 of availability under the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement while carrying $135,625 in total debt. Under the November 3, 2016 Second Amendment, we would have had $91,728 of borrowing availability. We believe this liquidity will provide the flexibility to operate the business in a prudent manner, continue to service our revolving debt facility, and weather a continued downturn in our markets.

Our cash balances are held in various locations throughout the world, with substantially all of those amounts held outside the U.S. Under current law, the foreign cash would be subject to U.S. federal income taxes less applicable foreign tax credits. We utilize planning and financing strategies to ensure that the Company’s cash is available as it is needed.

As of September 30, 2016, approximately $3,278 of our cash and cash equivalents was held in non-domestic bank accounts, and is not available to fund domestic operations unless repatriated. In addition, approximately $26,000 was subject to short-term intercompany advances into the U.S., which was used to fund our revolving credit facility at September 30, 2016. It is management’s intent to indefinitely reinvest such funds, including the short-term intercompany advances, outside of the United States.

At September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as revised by the First Amendment.

To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on outstanding variable-rate debt, the Company entered into forward starting LIBOR-based interest rate swaps with notional values totaling $50,000. The swaps will become effective in February 2017 at which point it will effectively convert a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowings during the term of the swap contract. At September 30, 2016, the swap liability was $2,307 compared to $196 as of December 31, 2015.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. When more than one accounting principle, or method of its application, is generally accepted, management selects the principle or method that, in its opinion, is appropriate in the Company’s specific circumstances. Application of these accounting principles requires management to reach opinions regarding estimates about the future resolution of existing uncertainties. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. In preparing these financial statements, management has reached its opinions regarding the best estimates and judgments of the amounts and disclosures included in the financial statements giving due regard to materiality. There have been no material changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies or estimates since December 31, 2015. A summary of the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates is included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements include operating leases, purchase obligations, and standby letters of credit. A schedule of the Company’s required payments under financial instruments and other commitments as of December 31, 2015 is included in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. There were no material changes to these off-balance sheet arrangements during the current quarter. These arrangements provide the Company with increased flexibility relative to the utilization and investment of cash resources.

36

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

The Company is exposed to risks that increases in interest rates may adversely affect funding costs associated with its variable-rate debt. To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on a portion of this variable-rate debt, the Company entered into forward starting interest rate swap agreements which effectively convert a portion of the debt from a variable to a fixed-rate borrowing during the term of the swap contracts. Refer to Note 10 within the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” of this report for additional information regarding the swap agreements.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, a 1% change in the interest rate for variable rate debt as of September 30, 2016 would increase or decrease interest expense by approximately $1,250.

If we had paid interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 under the terms of the Second Amendment, the interest for that period would have been approximately $5,200. A 1% change in the interest that would have been payable under the terms of the Second Amendment would change the amount of interest expense that would have been payable under the Second Amendment by approximately $1,250.

The Company does not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. At contract inception, the Company designates its derivative instruments as hedges. The Company recognizes all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. Fluctuations in the fair values of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings within other income as the underlying hedged items affect earnings. To the extent that a change in a derivative does not perfectly offset the change in value of the interest rate being hedged, the ineffective portion is recognized in earnings immediately.

As of September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a current liability of $2,307 related to its LIBOR-based interest rate swap agreements.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

The Company is subject to exposures to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company manages its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on firm sale and purchase commitments by entering into foreign currency forward contracts. The Company’s risk management objective is to reduce its exposure to the effects of changes in exchange rates on these transactions over the duration of the transactions. The Company did not engage in foreign currency hedging transactions during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

L.B. Foster Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2016. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We are in the process of integrating the IOS Holdings, Inc. and Tew Plus, Ltd. businesses. We are analyzing, evaluating and, where necessary, implementing changes in controls and procedures relating to these businesses as the integration proceeds. Similarly, as of April 1, 2016, we have transitioned certain product lines into a new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system. As such, the integration of recent acquisitions and ERP transition have resulted in additions and changes to our internal control over financial reporting. Otherwise, there were no changes in our “internal control over financial reporting” (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

37

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

See Note 14, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the risk factors and other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC on March 1, 2016, as well as our quarterly reports filed thereafter, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, financial results, or future performance. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially affect our business, financial condition, and/or results of operations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The Company’s purchases of equity securities for the three-month period ended September 30, 2016 were as follows:

					Total number of shares		Approximate dollar
			Average		purchased as		value of shares
	Total number		price		part of publicly		that may yet be
	of shares		paid per		announced plans		purchased under
	purchased (1)		share		or programs (2)		the plans or programs
July 1, 2016 - July 31, 2016		—	$	—		—	$	29,933
August 1, 2016 - August 31, 2016		—		—		—		29,933
September 1, 2016 - September 30, 2016		—		—		—		29,933
Total		—	$	—		—	$	29,933

(1) Shares withheld by the Company to pay taxes upon vesting of restricted stock.

(2) On December 9, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $30,000 of the Company’s common shares until December 31, 2017. This authorization became effective January 1, 2016.

a. The $30,000 repurchase authorization is restricted under the terms of the Second Amendment. Dividends, distributions, and redemptions are capped at a maximum annual amount of $1,700 throughout the life of the repurchase authorization.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

This item is not applicable to the Company.

38

Item 6. Exhibits

All exhibits are incorporated herein by reference:

10.1	Second Amendment dated November 7, 2016 to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015, and as amended by the First Amendment dated June 29, 2016, among Registrant and PNC Bank N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on November 8, 2016, File No. 0-10436.
*31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*32.0	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
*101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
*101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
*101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
*101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
*101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

* Exhibits marked with an asterisk are filed herewith.

39

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	L.B. FOSTER COMPANY
	(Registrant)
Date: November 8, 2016	By: /s/ David J. Russo
	David J. Russo
	Senior Vice President,
	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	(Duly Authorized Officer of Registrant)

40

Index to Exhibits

All exhibits are incorporated herein by reference:

Exhibit Number	Description
10.1	Second Amendment dated November 7, 2016 to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015, and as amended by the First Amendment dated June 29, 2016, among Registrant and PNC Bank N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on November 8, 2016, File No. 0-10436.
*31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*32.0	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
*101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
*101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
*101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
*101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
*101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

* Exhibits marked with an asterisk are filed herewith.

41

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification under Section 302 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert P. Bauer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of L.B. Foster Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 8, 2016	/s/ Robert P. Bauer
	Name: Robert P. Bauer
	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification under Section 302 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, David J. Russo, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of L.B. Foster Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 8, 2016	/s/ David J. Russo
	Name: David J. Russo
	Title: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

EX-32.0

Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of L.B. Foster Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 8, 2016	/s/ Robert P. Bauer
	Name: Robert P. Bauer
	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 8, 2016	/s/ David J. Russo
	Name: David J. Russo
	Title: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

XML

Document and Entity Information - shares	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Oct. 26, 2016
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2016
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2016
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Entity Registrant Name	FOSTER L B CO
Entity Central Index Key	0000352825
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		10,393,449
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Trading Symbol	fstr

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 3,651	$ 33,312
Accounts receivable - net	64,908	78,487
Inventories - net	91,381	96,396
Prepaid income tax	7,389	1,131
Other current assets	6,195	5,148
Total current assets	173,524	214,474
Property, plant and equipment - net	106,147	126,745
Other assets:
Goodwill	19,387	81,752
Other intangibles - net	65,813	134,927
Deferred tax assets	39,009	226
Investments	4,374	5,321
Other assets	3,026	3,215
Total assets	411,280	566,660
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Accounts payable	41,287	55,804
Deferred revenue	7,357	6,934
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	7,945	10,255
Accrued warranty	9,034	8,755
Current maturities of long-term debt	1,326	1,335
Other accrued liabilities	11,046	8,563
Total current liabilities	77,995	91,646
Long-term debt	134,299	167,419
Deferred tax liabilities	6,998	8,926
Other long-term liabilities	15,225	15,837
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Common stock, par value $.01, authorized 20,000,000 shares; shares issued at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 11,115,779; shares outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 10,300,823 and 10,221,006, respectively	111	111
Paid-in capital	44,220	46,681
Retained earnings	174,517	276,571
Treasury stock - at cost, common stock, shares at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 814,956 and 894,773, respectively	(19,644)	(22,591)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(22,441)	(17,940)
Total stockholders' equity	176,763	282,832
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$ 411,280	$ 566,660

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	20,000,000	20,000,000
Common stock, issued shares	11,115,779	11,115,779
Common stock, shares outstanding	10,300,823	10,221,006
Treasury stock shares - at cost, common stock	814,956	894,773

XML

Consolidated Statements of Operations - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Sales of goods	$ 100,293	$ 147,648	$ 326,278	$ 417,224
Sales of services	14,351	28,411	50,670	68,161
Total net sales	114,644	176,059	376,948	485,385
Cost of goods sold	81,674	117,474	260,705	328,461
Cost of services sold	13,167	22,547	44,667	53,143
Total cost of sales	94,841	140,021	305,372	381,604
Gross profit	19,803	36,038	71,576	103,781
Selling and administrative expenses	19,807	21,605	65,941	68,133
Amortization expense	1,763	3,337	7,818	8,950
Asset impairments	6,946	80,337	135,884	80,337
Interest expense	1,520	1,265	4,342	3,166
Interest income	(50)	(66)	(157)	(160)
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments	263	299	946	312
Other income	(1,085)	(537)	(263)	(1,245)
Total operating expenses	29,164	106,240	214,511	159,493
Loss before income taxes	(9,361)	(70,202)	(142,935)	(55,712)
Income tax benefit	(3,379)	(12,780)	(42,125)	(7,939)
Net loss	$ (5,982)	$ (57,422)	$ (100,810)	$ (47,773)
Basic loss per common share	$ (0.58)	$ (5.60)	$ (9.82)	$ (4.65)
Diluted loss per common share	(0.58)	(5.60)	(9.82)	(4.65)
Dividends paid per common share	$ 0.04	$ 0.04	$ 0.12	$ 0.12

XML

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income - USD ($) $ in Thousands		3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
		Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Net loss		$ (5,982)	$ (57,422)	$ (100,810)	$ (47,773)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(1,431)	(3,297)	(3,438)	(4,783)
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax expense (benefit) of $88, $(184) and $(815), $(184)		137	(294)	(1,286)	(294)
Reclassification of pension liability adjustments to earnings, net of tax expense of $38, $46 and $115, $140*	[1]	73	90	223	271
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(1,221)	(3,501)	(4,501)	(4,806)
Comprehensive loss		$ (7,203)	$ (60,923)	$ (105,311)	$ (52,579)

[1] Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for pension obligations are charged to selling and administrative expense.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, tax expense (benefit)	$ 88	$ (184)	$ (815)	$ (184)
Reclassification of pension liability adjustments to earnings, tax expense	$ 38	$ 46	$ 115	$ 140

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$ (100,810)	$ (47,773)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to cash provided by operating activities:
Deferred income taxes	(39,690)	(17,281)
Depreciation	10,620	10,593
Amortization	7,818	8,950
Asset impairments	135,884	80,337
Equity loss in nonconsolidated investments	946	312
Loss on sales and disposals of property, plant, and equipment	209	125
Share-based compensation	875	1,382
Excess income tax deficiency (benefit) from share-based compensation	124	(289)
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable	13,491	(1,485)
Inventories	3,188	(1,283)
Other current assets	(379)	625
Prepaid income tax	(6,436)	2,969
Other noncurrent assets	117	(1,101)
Dividends from LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC	0	90
Accounts payable	(13,256)	(16,058)
Deferred revenue	866	(317)
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	(2,294)	(5,283)
Other current liabilities	956	(370)
Other liabilities	(353)	(455)
Net cash provided by operating activities	11,876	13,688
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment	923	389
Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment	(6,507)	(11,618)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired	0	(193,871)
Loans and capital contributions to equity method investment	(635)	(61)
Net cash used by investing activities	(6,219)	(205,161)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayments of debt	(134,200)	(108,777)
Proceeds from debt	101,075	289,764
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock awards	0	68
Financing fees	(712)	(1,670)
Treasury stock acquisitions	(265)	(2,686)
Cash dividends on common stock paid to shareholders	(1,244)	(1,244)
Excess income tax (deficiency) benefit from share-based compensation	(124)	289
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities	(35,470)	175,744
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	152	(3,085)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(29,661)	(18,814)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	33,312	52,024
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	3,651	33,210
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid	3,485	2,513
Income taxes paid	$ 3,991	$ 6,280

XML

Financial Statements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Financial Statements [Abstract]

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all estimates and adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  However, actual results could differ from those estimates.  The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.  The year-end Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015 was derived from audited financial statements.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” refer collectively to L.B. Foster Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Recently issued accounting standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605, “Revenue Recognition.” ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. It also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating its implementation approach and assessing the impact of ASU 2014-09 on our financial position and results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. The new accounting requirements include the accounting for, presentation of, and classification of leases. The guidance will result in most leases being capitalized as a right of use asset with a related liability on our balance sheets. The requirements of the new standard are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is in the process of analyzing the impact of ASU 2016-02 on our financial position and results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718)." This standard makes several modifications to Topic 718 related to the accounting for forfeitures, employer tax withholding on share-based compensation, and the financial statement presentation of excess tax benefits or deficiencies. ASU 2016-09 also clarifies the statement of cash flows presentation for certain components of share-based awards. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, although early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of analyzing the impact of ASU 2016-09 on our financial position and results of operations.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, “Income Taxes – Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (Topic 740”), which will require an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. The ASU is effective on January 1, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-16 will have on our financial position and results of operations.

XML

Business Segments

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Business Segments [Abstract]

BUSINESS SEGMENTS

2. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company is a leading manufacturer, fabricator, and distributor of products and services for rail, construction, energy, and utility markets. The Company is organized and evaluated by product group, which is the basis for identifying reportable segments. Each segment represents a revenue-producing component of the Company for which separate financial information is produced internally and is subject to evaluation by the Company’s chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources. Each segment is evaluated based upon its respective contribution to the Company’s consolidated results based upon segment profit.

The following table illustrates revenues and profits (losses) from operations of the Company by segment for the periods indicated:

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30, 2016				September 30, 2016
		Net		Segment		Net		Segment
		Sales		Profit (loss)		Sales		Profit (loss)
Rail Products and Services	$	56,891	$	(2,047)	$	188,686	$	(26,474)
Construction Products		34,870		1,356		107,098		5,748
Tubular and Energy Services		22,883		(6,966)		81,164		(111,876)
Total	$	114,644	$	(7,657)	$	376,948	$	(132,602)

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30, 2015				September 30, 2015
		Net		Segment		Net		Segment
		Sales		Profit (loss)		Sales		Profit (loss)
Rail Products and Services	$	87,972	$	6,984	$	252,530	$	19,469
Construction Products		54,093		4,456		137,899		10,842
Tubular and Energy Services		33,994		(79,873)		94,956		(77,557)
Total	$	176,059	$	(68,433)	$	485,385	$	(47,246)

Segment profits (losses) from operations, as shown above, include internal cost of capital charges for assets used in the segment at a rate of generally 1% per month. There has been no change in the measurement of segment profit from operations since December 31, 2015. The internal cost of capital charges are eliminated during the consolidation process.

The following table provides a reconciliation of reportable segment net profit from operations to the Company’s consolidated total:

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
		2016		2015		2016		2015
Loss for reportable segments	$	(7,657)	$	(68,433)	$	(132,602)	$	(47,246)
Interest expense		(1,520)		(1,265)		(4,342)		(3,166)
Interest income		50		66		157		160
Other income		1,085		537		263		1,245
LIFO income		917		181		1,442		581
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments		(263)		(299)		(946)		(312)
Corporate expense, cost of capital elimination, and other unallocated charges		(1,973)		(989)		(6,907)		(6,974)
Loss before income taxes	$	(9,361)	$	(70,202)	$	(142,935)	$	(55,712)

The following table illustrates assets of the Company by segment:

		September 30,		December 31,
		2016		2015
Rail Products and Services	$	155,657	$	241,222
Construction Products		83,061		86,335
Tubular and Energy Services		103,976		216,715
Unallocated corporate assets		68,586		22,388
Total	$	411,280	$	566,660

XML

Acquisitions

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Acquisitions [Abstract]

Acquisitions

3. ACQUISITIONS

TEW Plus, LTD

On November 23, 2015, the Company acquired the 75% balance of the remaining shares of TEW Plus, LTD (“Tew Plus”) for $2,130, net of cash acquired. Headquartered in Nottingham, UK, Tew Plus provides telecommunications and security systems to the railway and commercial markets. Their offerings include full installation services including: design; project management; survey; and commissioning along with future maintenance. The results of Tew Plus’ operations are included within the Rail Products and Services segment from the date of acquisition.

Inspection Oilfield Services

On March 13, 2015, the Company acquired IOS Holdings, Inc. (“IOS” or “test and inspection services”) for $167,404, net of cash acquired and a net working capital receivable adjustment of $2,363. The purchase agreement includes an earn-out provision for the seller to generate an additional $60,000 of proceeds upon achieving certain levels of EBITDA during the three-year period beginning on January 1, 2015. The Company has not accrued an estimated earn-out obligation based upon a probability weighted valuation model of the projected EBITDA results, which indicates that the minimum target will not be achieved. Approximately $7,600 of the purchase price relates to amounts held in escrow to satisfy potential indemnity claims made under the purchase agreement. Headquartered in Houston, TX, IOS is a leading independent provider of tubular management services with operations in every significant oil and gas producing region in the continental United States. The results of IOS are included within our Tubular and Energy Services segment from the date of acquisition. 

Tew Holdings, LTD

On January 13, 2015, the Company acquired Tew Holdings, LTD (“Tew”) for $26,467, net of cash acquired. The purchase price includes approximately $4,200 related to working capital and net debt adjustments. The non-domestic cash payment includes approximately $600 which is held in escrow to satisfy potential indemnity claims made under the purchase agreement. Headquartered in Nottingham, UK, Tew provides application engineering solutions primarily to the rail market and other major industries. The results of Tew’s operations are included within the Rail Products and Services segment from the date of acquisition.

Acquisition Summary

Each transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which requires an acquiring entity to recognize, with limited exceptions, all of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at fair value as of the acquisition date. Goodwill primarily represents the value paid for each acquisition’s enhancement to the Company’s product and service offerings and capabilities, as well as a premium payment related to the ability to control the acquired assets. The Company has concluded that intangible assets and goodwill values resulting from the IOS, Tew, and Tew Plus transactions are not deductible for tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition:

Allocation of Purchase Price		November 23, 2015 - Tew Plus		March 13, 2015 - IOS			January 13, 2015 - Tew
Current assets	$	4,420	$	19,877		$	12,125
Other assets		-		708			-
Property, plant, and equipment		47		51,453	*		2,398
Goodwill		822		69,908	*		8,772
Other intangibles		1,074		50,354	*		14,048
Liabilities assumed		(3,597)		(23,596)			(6,465)
Total	$	2,766	$	168,704		$	30,878

* - As a result of the impact of the downturn within the energy markets, the expectations of a prolonged period before recovery, and the reduction in active U.S. land oil rig count, the Company performed an interim test for impairment of goodwill during the third quarter of 2015 that resulted in the full impairment of goodwill related to the IOS acquisition. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2016, the Company performed an interim impairment test due to further deterioration in projections that resulted in impairment of property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets as described in Notes 4 and 5.

The following table summarizes the estimates of the fair values of the identifiable intangible assets acquired:

Intangible Asset		November 23, 2015 - Tew Plus		March 13, 2015 - IOS			January 13, 2015 - Tew
Trade name	$	-	$	2,641		$	870
Customer relationships		817		41,171			10,035
Technology		203		4,364			2,480
Non-competition agreements		54		2,178			663
Total identified intangible assets	$	1,074	$	50,354	**	$	14,048

**- See Note 5 regarding intangible asset impairments.

XML

Property, Plant and Equipment

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]

Property, Plant and Equipment

4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant, and equipment at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 consist of the following:

		September 30,		December 31,
		2016		2015
Land	$	14,848	$	17,054
Improvements to land and leaseholds		17,626		16,590
Buildings		33,917		39,366
Machinery and equipment, including equipment under capitalized leases		116,355		118,677
Construction in progress		3,598		11,844
		186,344		203,531
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization, including accumulated amortization of capitalized leases		80,197		76,786
	$	106,147	$	126,745

We review our property, plant, and equipment for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We recognize an impairment loss if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. Due to the deterioration in projected results from the IOS subsidiary within the Tubular and Energy Services segment, the undiscounted cash flows were unable to support the carrying value of the asset group. The Company utilized level 3 unobservable inputs, specifically, the discounted cash flow method, to determine the expected net cash flows generated by the continued use of the assets. As a result of the testing, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment of $14,956during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016. The impairment is included within “Asset impairments” caption of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

XML

Goodwill and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Goodwill and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets [Abstract]

GOODWILL AND DEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS

5.  GOODWILL AND DEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following table represents the goodwill balance by reportable segment:

		Rail Products and Services		Construction Products		Tubular and Energy Services		Total
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	48,188	$	5,147	$	28,417	$	81,752
Foreign currency translation impact		(1,069)		-		-		(1,069)
Disposition		(154)		-		-		(154)
Impairment charges		(32,725)		-		(28,417)		(61,142)
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	14,240	$	5,147	$	-	$	19,387

The Company performs goodwill impairment tests annually during the fourth quarter, and also performs interim goodwill impairment tests if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. Qualitative factors are assessed to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. During the current year, various reporting units underperformed against their projections and revised their forecasts downward. The revised forecasts, which were primarily attributable to weakness in the rail and energy markets, indicated longer recovery horizons than we previously projected. In connection with the revisions to the longer term projections and a substantial decline in market capitalization, the Company concluded that these qualitative factors indicated that there was a more likely than not risk that the carrying value of goodwill exceeded its fair value.

As a result of the Company’s qualitative review, with the assistance of an independent valuation firm, the Company performed a quantitative interim test for impairment of goodwill as of June 1, 2016. The valuation included the use of both the income and market approaches. Greater weighting was applied to the income approach as the Company believes it is the most reliable indication of value as it captures forecasted revenues and earnings for the reporting units in the projection period that the market approach may not directly incorporate. In addition, a lack of comparable market transactions in recent months has limited the availability of information necessary for the market approach.

The results of the test indicated that the Rail Technologies (within the Rail Products and Services segment), Chemtec Energy Services, LLC (or “precision measurement systems”), and coated services (Chemtec and coated services are within the Tubular and Energy Services segment) reporting units’ respective fair values were less than their carrying value. All other reporting units that maintain goodwill substantially exceeded their carrying value and were not at risk of impairment. As a result of the continued weakness in the commodity cycles impacting the energy and rail markets, the near term projections of these reporting units have deteriorated and the expected future growth of the Rail Technologies, Chemtec, and coated services reporting units was determined to be insufficient to support the carrying values.

The Company determined the implied fair values of the Rail Technologies, Chemtec, and coated services reporting units by using level 3 unobservable inputs, which incorporated assumptions that we believe would be a reasonable market participant’s view in a hypothetical purchase, to develop the discounted cash flows of the respective reporting units. Significant level 3 inputs included the projected revenue and cost growth rates, capital expenditures, and weighted average costs of capital assumptions. The resulting fair values of each reporting unit were allocated to the assets and liabilities of the respective reporting unit as if each reporting unit had been acquired in business combinations as of the test date and the fair value was the purchase price paid to acquire each reporting unit. The results of the step 2 analysis indicated that the carrying amounts of the goodwill of Rail Technologies, Chemtec, and coated services exceeded the implied fair values of that goodwill. Accordingly, the Company recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment of $61,142, which represented the full impairment of goodwill within the Chemtec and coated services reporting units and approximately 68% of the Rail Technologies goodwill value. The impairment charge includes $4,383 related to Rail Technologies’ goodwill which was recorded during the three-month period ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the finalization of the interim impairment assessment, which the Company commenced during the second quarter.

The following table represents the gross definite-lived intangible assets balance by reportable segment:

		September 30,		December 31,
		2016		2015
Rail Products and Services	$	57,134	$	59,226
Construction Products		1,348		1,348
Tubular and Energy Services		29,179		98,166
	$	87,661	$	158,740

Due to the indicators previously noted, the Company performed recoverability tests on reporting units when it was more likely than not that the carrying value of the long-lived asset group would not be recoverable. The results of our testing indicated that the long-lived assets related to the IOS and Chemtec divisions, within the Tubular and Energy Services segment, had carrying values in excess of the asset groups’ fair value. Based upon level 3 unobservable inputs, the Company incorporated assumptions that we believe would be a reasonable market participant’s view in a hypothetical purchase, to develop the discounted cash flows. Significant level 3 inputs included the projected revenue and cost growth rates, capital expenditures, and weighted average costs of capital assumptions. As a result of the analysis, the Company recorded a $42,982non-cash impairment of definite-lived intangible assets related to the IOS division and a $16,804 non-cash impairment of definite-lived intangible assets related to the Chemtec division. Included within the Chemtec impairment is $2,563 recorded during the three-month period ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the finalization of the Company’s interim impairment review, which the Company commenced during the second quarter.

The components of the Company’s definite-lived intangible assets are as follows:

	September 30, 2016
	Weighted Average		Gross				Net
	Amortization Period		Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying
	In Years		Value		Amortization		Amount
Non-compete agreements	5	$	4,252	$	(2,005)	$	2,247
Patents	10		380		(145)		235
Customer relationships	17		37,295		(6,069)		31,226
Trademarks and trade names	14		10,054		(3,036)		7,018
Technology	14		35,680		(10,593)		25,087
		$	87,661	$	(21,848)	$	65,813

	December 31, 2015
	Weighted Average		Gross				Net
	Amortization Period		Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying
	In Years		Value		Amortization		Amount
Non-compete agreements	4	$	6,984	$	(2,495)	$	4,489
Patents	10		378		(124)		254
Customer relationships	16		94,338		(8,441)		85,897
Supplier relationships	5		350		(335)		15
Trademarks and trade names	13		14,252		(3,025)		11,227
Technology	13		42,438		(9,393)		33,045
		$	158,740	$	(23,813)	$	134,927

Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives ranging from 2 to 25 years, with a total weighted average amortization period of approximately 15 years at September 30, 2016.  Amortization expense for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $1,763 and $3,337, respectively.  Amortization expense for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $7,818 and $8,950, respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of 2016 and thereafter is as follows:

		Amortization Expense
2016	$	1,780
2017		7,112
2018		7,008
2019		6,276
2020		5,909
2021 and thereafter		37,728
	$	65,813

XML

Accounts Receivable

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Accounts Receivable [Abstract]

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

6. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Credit is extended based upon an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and, while collateral is not required, the Company periodically receives surety bonds that guarantee payment.  The amounts of trade accounts receivable at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 have been reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,750 and  $1,485, respectively.

XML

Inventories

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Inventories [Abstract]

Inventories

7. INVENTORIES

Inventories at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized in the following table:

		September 30,		December 31,
		2016		2015
Finished goods	$	54,659	$	62,547
Work-in-process		20,418		20,178
Raw materials		20,683		19,492
Total inventories at current costs		95,760		102,217
Less: LIFO reserve		(4,379)		(5,821)
	$	91,381	$	96,396

Inventory is generally valued at the lower of last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) cost or market.  Other inventories of the Company are valued at average cost or market, whichever is lower.  An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method is made at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time.  Interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end levels and costs.

XML

Investments

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Investments [Abstract]

INVESTMENTS

8. INVESTMENTS

The Company is a member of a joint venture, LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC (“LB Pipe JV”), in which it maintains a 45% ownership interest.  LB Pipe JV manufactures, markets, and sells various precision coupling products for the energy, utility, and construction markets and is scheduled to terminate on June 30, 2019. 

Under applicable guidance for variable interest entities in ASC 810, “Consolidation,” the Company determined that the LB Pipe JV is a variable interest entity. The Company concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity, as the Company does not have a controlling financial interest and does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the LB Pipe JV. Accordingly, the Company concluded that the equity method of accounting remains appropriate.

AtSeptember 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had a nonconsolidated equity method investment of $4,245 and $5,246, respectively, in LB Pipe JV and other equity investments totaling $129 and $75, respectively.

The Company recorded equity in the loss of LB Pipe JV of $276and $292 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded equity in the loss of LB Pipe JV of $1,001 and $289, respectively.

The Company continues to monitor the recoverability of the assets associated with LB Pipe JV and the long-term financial projections of the businesses.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2015, the Company received cash distributions from LB Pipe JV of $90. There were no changes to the members’ ownership interests as a result of the distribution. During 2016, the Company and the other 45% member each executed a revolving line of credit with the LB Pipe JV with an available limit of $750. The Company and the other 45% member each loaned $635 to the LB Pipe JV in an effort to maintain compliance with the LB Pipe JV’s debt covenants with an unaffiliated bank. The Company’s loan with the LB Pipe JV matures on December 15, 2016.

The Company’s exposure to loss results from its capital contributions and lending activity, net of the Company’s share of the LB Pipe JV’s income or loss, and its net investment in the direct financing lease covering the facility used by the LB Pipe JV for its operations, which is described below.  The carrying amounts with the maximum exposure to loss of the Company at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, are as follows:

		September 30,		December 31,
		2016		2015
LB Pipe JV equity method investment	$	4,245	$	5,246
Loan receivable		635		-
Net investment in direct financing lease		899		995
	$	5,779	$	6,241

The Company is leasing five acres of land and two facilities to the LB Pipe JV through June 30, 2019, with a 5.5-year renewal period.  The current monthly lease payments approximate $17, with a balloon payment of approximately $488, which is required to be paid either at the termination of the lease, allocated over the renewal period, or during the initial term of the lease.  This lease qualifies as a direct financing lease under the applicable guidance in ASC 840-30, “Leases.”

The following is a schedule of the direct financing minimum lease payments for the remainder of 2016 and the years 2017 and thereafter:

		Minimum Lease Payments
2016	$	35
2017		140
2018		150
2019		574
	$	899

XML

Long-Term Debt

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Long-Term Debt [Abstract]

Long-Term Debt

9. LONG-TERM DEBT

United States

Long-term debt consists of the following:

		September 30,		December 31,
		2016		2015
Revolving credit facility	$	132,847	$	165,000
Capital leases and financing agreements		2,778		3,754
Total		135,625		168,754
Less current maturities		1,326		1,335
Long-term portion	$	134,299	$	167,419

On June 29, 2016, L.B. Foster Company, its domestic subsidiaries, and certain of its Canadian subsidiaries (“L.B. Foster”) entered into the First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015 (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”), with PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company. This First Amendment modifies the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which had a maximum credit line of $335,000. The First Amendment reduces the permitted borrowings to $275,000. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement has been amended subsequent to September 30, 2016. See Note 16 “Subsequent Events”.

The Company’s and the domestic guarantors’ obligations under the First Amendment are secured by the grant of a security interest by the domestic borrowers and domestic guarantors in substantially all of the personal property owned by such entities.  Additionally, the equity interests in each of the domestic loan parties, other than the Company, and the equity interests held by each domestic loan party in their domestic subsidiaries, are pledged to the lenders as collateral for the lending obligations.

Borrowings under the First Amendment bear interest at rates based upon either the base rate or Euro-rate plus applicable margins.  Applicable margins are dictated by the ratio of the Company’s indebtedness less consolidated cash on hand to the Company’s consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the underlying Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.  The base rate is the highest of (a) PNC Bank’s prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or (c) the daily Euro-rate (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) plus 1.00%.  The base rate and Euro-rate spreads range from 0.025% to 2.25% and 1.25% to 3.25%, respectively.

The First Amendment provides that liens on the collateral will be released upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including the submission by the loan parties of a compliance certificate for two consecutive fiscal quarters, calculated for the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ending, each evidencing a Leverage Ratio (defined as the Company’s indebtedness less cash on hand in excess of $15,000, divided by the Company’s consolidated EBITDA) of less than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00; provided that the last day of such two consecutive fiscal quarters cannot be earlier than June 30, 2018.

Certain financial covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were also amended.  The First Amendment revises the maximum Leverage Ratio, which must not exceed the amounts set forth below for applicable fiscal quarters:  June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016,  4.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2016, 4.50 to 1.00; March 31, 2017, 4.25 to 1.00; June 30, 2017, 4.00 to 1.00; September 30, 2017, 3.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2017, 3.50 to 1.00; and March 31, 2018 and all fiscal quarters ending thereafter,  3.25 to 1.00. 

At September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as revised by the First Amendment.

Loans and advances to non-loan parties and loans, advances, and investments by domestic loan parties to subsidiaries that are not loan parties and to foreign loan parties is not permitted to exceed $10,000 in the aggregate at any one time, provided that, on March 31, 2018, when the Maximum Leverage Ratio requirement is 3.25 to 1.00, this limit will increase to $75,000.

The First Amendment permits the Company to pay dividends, distributions, and make redemptions with respect to its stock provided no event of default or potential default (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) has occurred prior to or after giving effect to the dividend, distribution, or redemption. Dividends, distributions, and redemptions are capped at $4,000 per year when funds are drawn on the facility until March 31, 2018, when the maximum Leverage Ratio requirement is 3.25 to 1.00, at which time this limit will increase to $25,000. Dividends of $1,244 or $0.12 per share were distributed for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016.

If no drawings on the facility exist, dividends, distributions, and redemptions in excess of $4,000 (or $25,000, as appropriate) per year are subjected to a limitation of $75,000 in the aggregate. The $75,000 aggregate limitation also permits certain loans, investments, and acquisitions.

The First Amendment provides that each of the loan parties and their subsidiaries shall not enter into any merger, consolidation, or other reorganization, or acquire all or substantially all of the assets, division, business, stock, or other ownership interests or permit any consolidation or merger with an aggregate consideration in excess of $12,000 until after March 31, 2018.

At September 30, 2016, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $425 and had gross available borrowing capacity of $141,728. The current quarter reduction in debt was largely attributable to $26,000 of short-term intercompany advances from foreign subsidiaries into the U.S., which was used to fund our revolving credit facility at September 30, 2016. The maturity date of the First Amendment is March 13, 2020.  

United Kingdom

A subsidiary of the Company has a credit facility with NatWest Bank for its United Kingdom operations that includes an overdraft availability of £1,500 pounds sterling (approximately $1,946 at September 30, 2016).  This credit facility supports the subsidiary’s working capital requirements and is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of its United Kingdom operations.  The interest rate on this facility is the financial institution’s base rate plus 1.50%.  Outstanding performance bonds reduce availability under this credit facility.  The subsidiary of the Company had no outstanding borrowings under this credit facility as of September 30, 2016.  There was approximately $311in outstanding guarantees (as defined in the underlying agreement) at September 30, 2016.  This credit facility was renewed and amended during the fourth quarter of 2015 to include Tew and Tew Plus as parties to the agreement. All other underlying terms and conditions remained unchanged as a result of the renewal. It is the Company’s intention to renew this credit facility with NatWest Bank during the annual review in the fourth quarter 2016.

The United Kingdom credit facility contains certain financial covenants that require that subsidiary to maintain senior interest and cash flow coverage ratios. The subsidiary was in compliance with these financial covenants as of September30, 2016.  The subsidiary had available borrowing capacity of $1,635 as of September 30, 2016.

XML

Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

10. Fair Value Measurements

The Company determines the fair value of assets and liabilities based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The fair values are based on assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in valuation techniques and the inputs to valuations. The fair value hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions of what market participants would use. The fair value hierarchy includes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as described below:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Cash equivalents - Included within “Cash and cash equivalents” are investments in non-domestic term deposits. The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of the instruments.

LIBOR-Based interest rate swaps - To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on outstanding variable-rate debt, the Company entered into forward starting LIBOR-Based interest rate swaps with notional values totaling $50,000. The swaps will become effective in February 2017, at which point it will effectively convert a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowings during the term of the swap contract. The fair value of the interest rate swaps is based on market-observable forward interest rates and represents the estimated amount that the Company would pay to terminate the agreements. As such, the swap agreements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. At September 30, 2016, the interest rate swaps were recorded within other accrued liabilities.

		Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using								Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
		September 30, 2016		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		December 31, 2015		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Term deposits	$	16	$	16	$	-	$	-	$	1,939	$	1,939	$	-	$	-
Total assets	$	16	$	16	$	-	$	-	$	1,939	$	1,939	$	-	$	-
Interest rate swaps	$	2,307	$	-	$	2,307	$	-	$	196	$	-	$	196	$	-
Total liabilities	$	2,307	$	-	$	2,307	$	-	$	196	$	-	$	196	$	-

XML

Earnings Per Common Share

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Earnings Per Common Share [Abstract]

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

11. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

(Share amounts in thousands)

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share for the periods indicated:

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
		2016		2015		2016		2015
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per common share -
(Loss) available to common stockholders:
Net loss	$	(5,982)	$	(57,422)	$	(100,810)	$	(47,773)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding		10,296		10,256		10,264		10,266
Denominator for basic earnings per common share		10,296		10,256		10,264		10,266
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options		-		-		-		-
Other stock compensation plans		-		-		-		-
Dilutive potential common shares		-		-		-		-
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share - adjusted weighted average shares outstanding and assumed conversions		10,296		10,256		10,264		10,266
Basic loss per common share	$	(0.58)	$	(5.60)	$	(9.82)	$	(4.65)
Diluted loss per common share	$	(0.58)	$	(5.60)	$	(9.82)	$	(4.65)
Dividends paid per common share	$	0.04	$	0.04	$	0.12	$	0.12

During the three-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, there were approximately 34 and 48 anti-dilutive shares excluded from the preceding calculation, respectively. During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, there were 80 and 81 anti-dilutive shares excluded from the preceding calculation, respectively.

XML

Stock-Based Compensation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Share-based Compensation [Abstract]

Share-based Compensation

12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company applies the provisions of FASB ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” to account for the Company’s share-based compensation.  Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award and is recognized over the employees’ requisite service period.  The Company recorded stock compensation expense of $320 and $(514) for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to restricted stock awards and performance unit awards. Stock compensation expense of $875 and $1,382 was recorded for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. At September 30, 2016, unrecognized compensation expense for awards that the Company expects to vest approximated $1,955. The Company will recognize this expense over the upcoming four years through August 2020.

Shares issued as a result of vested stock-based compensation generally will be from previously issued shares that have been reacquired by the Company and held as Treasury shares or authorized but previously unissued common stock.

During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized reductions in excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation of $124 and excess tax benefits of $289,respectively. The change in excess income tax benefits have been included in cash flows from financing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Stock Option Awards

At September 30, 2016, there were no outstanding and exercisable stock options. During the first quarter of 2015, the remaining 7,500 outstanding stock options were exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $9.08.  There were no new grants of stock option awards during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.

Restricted Stock Awards and Performance Unit Awards

Under the amended and restated 2006 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, the Company grants eligible employees restricted stock and performance unit awards. The forfeitable restricted stock awards granted prior to March 2015 generally time-vest after a four-year holding period, and those granted subsequent to March 2015 generally time-vest ratably over a three-year period, unless indicated otherwise by the underlying restricted stock award agreement. Performance unit awards are offered annually under separate three-year long-term incentive plans. Performance units are subject to forfeiture and will be converted into common stock of the Company based upon the Company’s performance relative to performance measures and conversion multiples as defined in the underlying plan. If the Company’s estimate of the number of performance stock awards expected to vest changes in a subsequent accounting period, cumulative compensation expense could increase or decrease. The change will be recognized in the current period for the vested shares and would change future expense over the remaining vesting period.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the Company, with shareholder approval, amended its 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan and registered 370,000 additional shares under the amendment. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the 2016 Performance Share Unit Program, the Executive Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (consisting of cash and equity components) and the 2016 Free Cash Flow Program (cash award only). The Compensation Committee also certified the actual performance achievement of participants in the 2013 Performance Share Unit Program. Actual performance resulted in no payout relative to the target performance metrics.

The following table summarizes the restricted stock award and performance unit award activity for the period ended September 30, 2016:

	Restricted	Performance		Weighted Average
	Stock	Stock		Grant Date
	Units	Units		Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2015	93,817	35,999	$	39.66
Granted	48,283	129,844		12.50
Vested	(43,453)	-		29.30
Adjustment for incentive awards not expected to vest	-	(93,103)		24.79
Canceled	(6,021)	(9,050)		18.82
Outstanding at September 30, 2016	92,626	63,690	$	21.88

XML

Retirement Plans

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Retirement Plans [Abstract]

RETIREMENT PLANS

13. RETIREMENT PLANS

Retirement Plans

The Company has seven retirement plans which cover its hourly and salaried employees in the United States: three defined benefit plans (one active / two frozen) and four defined contribution plans.  Employees are eligible to participate in the appropriate plan based on employment classification.  The Company's funding contributions to the defined benefit and defined contribution plans are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA"), applicable plan policy and investment guidelines. The Company’s policy is to contribute at least the minimum in accordance with the funding standards of ERISA.

The Company’s subsidiary, L.B. Foster Rail Technologies, Inc. (“Rail Technologies”), maintains two defined contribution plans for its employees in Canada, as well as a post-retirement benefit plan.  In the United Kingdom, Rail Technologies maintains two defined contribution plans and a defined benefit plan. 

United States Defined Benefit Plans

Net periodic pension costs for the United States defined benefit pension plans for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
		2016		2015		2016		2015
Service cost	$	9	$	10	$	27	$	29
Interest cost		186		185		559		555
Expected return on plan assets		(179)		(203)		(538)		(611)
Recognized net actuarial loss		69		69		207		207
Net periodic pension cost	$	85	$	61	$	255	$	180

The Company does not expect to contribute to its United States defined benefit plans in 2016.

United Kingdom Defined Benefit Plans

Net periodic pension costs for the United Kingdom defined benefit pension plan for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
		2016		2015		2016		2015
Interest cost	$	73	$	78	$	223	$	231
Expected return on plan assets		(82)		(83)		(250)		(249)
Amortization of prior service costs and transition amount		5		5		15		15
Recognized net actuarial loss		38		60		116		177
Net periodic pension cost	$	34	$	60	$	104	$	174

United Kingdom regulations require trustees to adopt a prudent approach to funding required contributions to defined benefit pension plans. Employer contributions of approximately $240 are anticipated to the United Kingdom L.B. Foster Rail Technologies, Inc. pension plan during 2016.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company contributed approximately $180 to the plan. 

Defined Contribution Plans

The Company sponsors eight defined contribution plans for hourly and salaried employees across our domestic and international facilities. The following table summarizes the expense associated with the contributions made to these plans.

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
		2016		2015		2016		2015
United States	$	152	$	413	$	1,289	$	1,842
Canada		46		54		164		167
United Kingdom		64		162		281		360
	$	262	$	629	$	1,734	$	2,369

XML

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Product Liability Claims

The Company is subject to product warranty claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business.  For certain manufactured products, the Company maintains a product warranty accrual which is adjusted on a monthly basis as a percentage of cost of sales.  The product warranty accrual is periodically adjusted based on the identification or resolution of known individual product warranty claims. 

The following table sets forth the Company’s product warranty accrual:

		Warranty Liability
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	8,755
Additions to warranty liability		961
Warranty liability utilized		(682)
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	9,034

Included within the above table are concrete tie warranty reserves of approximately $7,460 and $7,544  atSeptember 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Concrete Tie Matter

On July 12, 2011, UPRR notified (the “UPRR Notice”) the Company and its subsidiary, CXT Incorporated (“CXT”), of a warranty claim under CXT’s 2005 supply contract relating to the sale of pre-stressed concrete railroad ties to UPRR. UPRR asserted that a significant percentage of concrete ties manufactured in 2006 through 2011 at CXT’s Grand Island, NE facility failed to meet contract specifications, had workmanship defects and were cracking and failing prematurely. Of the 3.0 million ties manufactured between 1998 and 2011 from the Grand Island, NE facility, approximately 1.6 million ties were sold during the period UPRR had claimed nonconformance. The 2005 contract called for each concrete tie which failed to conform to the specifications or had a material defect in workmanship to be replaced with 1.5 new concrete ties, provided, that, within five years of the sale of a concrete tie, UPRR notified CXT of such failure to conform or such defect in workmanship. The UPRR Notice did not specify how many ties manufactured during this period were defective nor the exact nature of the alleged workmanship defect.

Following the UPRR Notice, the Company worked with material scientists and pre-stressed concrete experts to test a representative sample of Grand Island, NE concrete ties and assess warranty claims for certain concrete ties made in its Grand Island, NE facility between 1998 and 2011. The Company discontinued manufacturing operations in Grand Island, NE in early 2011.

2012

During 2012, the Company completed sufficient testing and analysis to further understand this matter. Based upon testing results and expert analysis, the Company believed it discovered conditions, which largely related to the 2006 to 2007 manufacturing period, that can shorten the life of the concrete ties produced during this period. During the fourth quarter of 2012 and first quarter of 2013, the Company reached agreement with UPRR on several matters including a process for the Company and UPRR to work together to identify, prioritize, and replace defective ties that meet the criteria for replacement. This process applies to the ties the Company shipped to UPRR from its Grand Island, NE facility from 1998 to 2011. During most of this period, the Company’s warranty policy for UPRR carried a 5-year warranty with a 1.5:1 replacement ratio for any defective ties. In order to accommodate UPRR and other customer concerns, the Company also reverted to a previously used warranty policy providing a 15-year warranty with a 1:1 replacement ratio. This change provided an additional 10 years of warranty protection. In the amended 2005 supply agreement, the Company and UPRR also extended the supply of Tucson ties by five years and agreed on a cash payment of $12,000 to UPRR as compensation for concrete ties already replaced by UPRR during the investigation period.

During 2012, as a result of the testing that the Company conducted on concrete ties manufactured at its former Grand Island, NE facility and the developments related to UPRR and other customer matters, the Company recorded pre-tax warranty charges of $22,000 in “Cost of Goods Sold” within its Rail Products and Services segment based on the Company’s estimate of the number of defective concrete ties that will ultimately require replacement during the applicable warranty periods.

2013

Throughout 2013, at UPRR’s request and under the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement, the Company provided warranty replacement concrete ties for use across certain UPRR subdivisions. The Company attempted to reconcile the quantity of warranty claims for ties replaced and obtain supporting detail for the ties removed. The Company believes that UPRR did not replace concrete ties in accordance with the amended agreement and has not furnished adequate documentation throughout the replacement process in these subdivisions to support its full warranty claim. Based on the information received by the Company to date, the Company believes that a significant number of ties which UPRR replaced in these subdivisions did not meet the criteria to be covered as warranty replacement ties under the amended 2005 supply agreement. The disagreement related to the 2013 warranty replacement activity includes approximately 170,000 ties where the Company provided detailed documentation supporting our position with reason codes that detail why these ties are not eligible for a warranty claim.

In late November 2013, the Company received notice from UPRR asserting a material breach of the amended 2005 supply agreement. UPRR’s notice asserted that the failure to honor its claims for warranty ties in these subdivisions was a material breach. Following receipt of this notice, the Company provided information to UPRR to refute UPRR’s claim of breach and included the reconciliation of warranty claims supported by substantial findings from the Company’s track observation team, all within the 90-day cure period. The Company also proposed further discussions to reach agreement on reconciliation for 2013 replacement activities and future replacement activities and a recommended process that will ensure future replacement activities are done with appropriate documentation and per the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement.

2014

During the first quarter of 2014, the Company further responded within the 90-day cure period to UPRR’s claim and presented a reconciliation for the subdivisions at issue. This proposed reconciliation was based on empirical data and visual observation from Company employees that were present during the replacement process for a substantial majority of the concrete ties replaced. The Company spent considerable time documenting facts related to concrete tie condition and track condition to assess whether the ties replaced met the criteria to be eligible for replacement under the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement.

During 2014, the Company increased its accrual by an additional $8,766 based on revised estimates of ties to be replaced based upon scientific testing and other analysis, adjusted for ties already provided to UPRR. The Company continued to work with UPRR to identify, replace, and reconcile defective ties related to the warranty claim in accordance with the amended 2005 supply agreement. The Company and UPRR met during the third quarter of 2014 to evaluate each other’s position in an effort to work towards agreement on the unreconciled 2013 and 2014 replacement activity as well as the standards and practices to be implemented for future replacement activity and warranty tie replacement.

In November and December of 2014, the Company received additional notices from UPRR asserting that ties manufactured in 2000 were defective and again asserting material breaches of the amended 2005 supply agreement relating to warranty tie replacements as well as certain new ties provided to UPRR being out of specification.

At December 31, 2014, the Company and UPRR had not been able to reconcile the disagreement related to the 2013 and 2014 warranty replacement activity. The disagreement relating to the 2014 warranty replacement activity includes approximately 90,100 ties that the Company believes are not warranty-eligible.

2015

On January 23, 2015, UPRR filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial in the District Court for Douglas County, NE against the Company and its subsidiary, CXT, asserting, among other matters, that the Company breached its express warranty, breached an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and anticipatorily repudiated its warranty obligations, and that UPRR’s exclusive and limited remedy provisions in the supply agreement have failed of their essential purpose which entitles UPRR to recover all incidental and consequential damages. The Complaint seeks to cancel all duties of UPRR under the contract, to adjudge the Company as having no remaining rights under the contracts, and to recover damages in an amount to be determined at trial for the value of unfulfilled warranty replacement ties and ties likely to become warranty eligible, for costs of cover for replacement ties, and for various incidental and consequential damages. The amended 2005 supply agreement provides that UPRR’s exclusive remedy is to receive a replacement tie that meets the contract specifications for each tie that failed to meet the contract specifications or otherwise contained a material defect provided that the Company receives written notice of such failure or defect within 15 years after that tie was produced. The amended 2005 supply agreement provides that the Company’s warranty does not apply to ties that (a) have been repaired or altered without the Company’s written consent in such a way as to affect the stability or reliability thereof, (b) have been subject to misuse, negligence, or accident, or (c) have been improperly maintained or used contrary to the specifications for which such ties were produced. The amended 2005 supply agreement also continues to provide that the Company’s warranty is in lieu of all other express or implied warranties and that neither party shall be subject to or liable for any incidental or consequential damages to the other party. The dispute is largely based on (1) claims submitted that the Company believes are for ties claimed for warranty replacement that are inaccurately rated and are not the responsibility of the Company and claims that do not meet the criteria of a warranty replacement and (2) UPRR’s assertion, which the Company vigorously disputes, that UPRR in future years will be entitled to warranty replacement ties for virtually all of the Grand Island ties. Many thousands of Grand Island ties have been performing in track for over ten years. In addition, a significant amount of Grand Island ties were rated by both parties in the excellent category of the rating system.

In June 2015, UPRR delivered an additional notice alleging deficiencies in certain ties produced in the Company’s Tucson and Spokane locations and other claimed material breaches which the Company contends are unfounded. The Company again responded to UPRR that it was not in material breach of the amended 2005 supply agreement relating to warranty tie replacements and that the ties in question complied with the specifications provided by UPRR.

On June 16 and 17, 2015, UPRR issued formal notice of the termination of the concrete tie supply agreement as well as the termination of the lease agreement at the Tucson, AZ production facility and rejection and revocation of its prior acceptance of certain ties manufactured at the Company’s Spokane, WA production facility. Since that time, UPRR has discontinued submitting purchase orders to the Company for shipment of warranty replacement ties.

On May 29, 2015, the Company and CXT filed an Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims in response to the Complaint, denying liability to UPRR. As a result of UPRR’s subsequent June 16-17, 2015 actions and certain related conduct, the Company on October 5, 2015 amended the pending Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to add, among other things, assertions that UPRR’s conduct in question was wrongful and unjustified and constituted additional grounds for the affirmative defenses to UPRR’s claims and also for the Company’s counterclaims.

2016

By Scheduling Order dated June 29, 2016, an August 31, 2017 deadline for the completion of fact discovery has been established and trial may proceed at some future date after October 30, 2017, and UPRR has filed an amended notice of trial to commence on October 30, 2017. During the first nine months of 2016, the parties continued to conduct discovery. The Company intends to continue to engage in discussions in an effort to resolve the UPRR matter. However, we cannot predict that such discussions will be successful, or that the results of the litigation with UPRR, or any settlement or judgment amounts, will reasonably approximate our estimated accruals for loss contingencies. Future potential costs pertaining to UPRR’s claims and the outcome of the UPRR litigation could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

As a result of the preliminary status of the litigation and the uncertainty of any potential judgment, an estimate of any additional loss, or a range of loss, associated with this litigation cannot be made based upon currently available information.

Environmental and Legal Proceedings

In September 2015, the Company was notified of a collective action complaint by current and former test and inspection services employees to recover unpaid overtime wages and other damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties commenced court ordered mediation on October 17, 2016.  The Company has engaged a third party specialist to assist in claim valuation, but the parties have not engaged in any discovery to date, and there is no certainty of a potential resolution at this time. An estimate of any range of potential loss associated with this claim cannot be made based upon currently available information.

The Company is subject to national, state, foreign, provincial, and/or local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment.  The Company’s efforts to comply with environmental regulations may have an adverse effect on its future earnings.  In the opinion of management, compliance with the present environmental protection laws will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, competitive position, or capital expenditures of the Company.

At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company maintained environmental reserves approximating $6,587 and $6,640, respectively. The following table sets forth the Company’s environmental obligation:

		Environmental liability
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	6,640
Additions to environmental obligations		26
Environmental obligations utilized		(79)
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	6,587

The Company is also subject to other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. The amounts currently reserved are immaterial to our financial position and liquidity and the estimate of additional loss exposure is immaterial to our results of operations.

XML

Income Taxes

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Income Taxes [Abstract]

INCOME TAXES

15. INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective income tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 36.1% and 29.5%, respectively, and18.2% and 14.3% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate for the 2016 periods differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the discrete impact of current year asset impairments. The Company’s asset impairments of $6,946 and  $135,884 for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, respectively, were related to both tax deductible and nondeductible assets and resulted in income tax benefits of $1,000 and $39,038, respectively.

XML

Subsequent Events

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Due to the continued weakness in the markets that we serve, during the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company estimates severance charges of approximately $1,000will be recorded related to reduction in force activity as the Company continues to react to changes in market conditions.

On November 7, 2016, L. B. Foster Company (the “Company”), its domestic subsidiaries, and certain of its Canadian subsidiaries entered into the Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015 and as amended by the First Amendment dated June 29, 2016 (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”), with PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company. This Second Amendment modifies the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement which had a maximum revolving credit line of $275,000. The Second Amendment reduces the permitted revolving credit borrowings to $195,000 and provides for additional term loan borrowing of up to $30,000.  The term loan will be subject to quarterly straight line amortization until fully paid off upon the final payment on January 1, 2020.  Furthermore, certain matters, including excess cash flow, asset sales, and equity issuances, trigger mandatory prepayments to the Term Loan.  Term loan borrowings will not be available to draw upon once they have been repaid.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Second Amendment or Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as applicable.

The Second Amendment further provides for modifications to the financial covenants as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.  The Second Amendment calls for the elimination of the Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant through the quarter ended June 30, 2018.  After that period, the Maximum Gross Leverage Ratio covenant will be reinstated to require a maximum ratio of 4.25 Consolidated Indebtedness to 1.00 Gross Leverage for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, and 3.75 to 1.00 for all periods thereafter until the maturity date of the credit facility.  The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Last Twelve Months EBITDA covenant (“Minimum EBITDA”).  For the quarter ending December 31, 2016 through the quarter ending June 30, 2017, the Minimum EBITDA must be at least $18,500.  For each quarter thereafter, through the quarter ended June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will increase by various increments.  At June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will be $31,000.  After the quarter ended June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA covenant will be eliminated through the maturity of the credit agreement.  The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant.  The covenant represents the ratio of the Company’s fixed charges to the last twelve months of EBITDA, and is required to be a minimum of 1.00 to 1.00 through the quarter ended December 31, 2017 and 1.25 to 1.00 for each quarter thereafter through the maturity of the credit facility.  The final financial covenant included in the Second Amendment is a Minimum Liquidity covenant which calls for a minimum of $25,000 in undrawn availability on the revolving credit loan at all times through the quarter ended June 30, 2018.

The Second Amendment includes several changes to certain non-financial covenants as defined in the Credit Agreement.  Through the maturity date of the loan, the Company is now prohibited from making any future acquisitions.  The limitation on permitted annual distributions of dividends or redemptions of the Company’s stock has been decreased from $4,000 to $1,700.  The aggregate limitation on loans to and investments in non-loan parties was decreased from $10,000 to $5,000.  Furthermore, the limitation on asset sales has been decreased from $25,000 annually with a carryover of up to $15,000 from the prior year to $25,000 in the aggregate through the maturity date of the credit facility.

The Second Amendment provides for the elimination of the three lowest tiers of the pricing grid that had previously been defined in the First Amendment.  Upon execution of the Second Amendment through the quarter ended March 31, 2018, the Company will be locked into the highest tier of the pricing grid which provides for pricing of the prime rate plus 225 basis points on base rate loans and the applicable LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points on euro rate loans. For each quarter after March 31, 2018 and through the maturity date of the credit facility, the Company’s position on the pricing grid will be governed by a Minimum Net Leverage ratio which is the ratio of Consolidated Indebtedness  less cash on hand in excess of $15,000 to EBITDA. If, after March 31, 2018 the Minimum Net Leverage ratio positions the Company on the lowest tier of the pricing grid, pricing will be the prime rate plus 150 basis points on base rate loans or the applicable LIBOR rate plus 250 basis points on euro rate loans.

The Company anticipates a fourth quarter 2016 charge of approximately $500 related to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees as a result of the amendment.

Lastly, on November 7, 2016, the Company announced that its Board of Directors decided to suspend the quarterly dividend beginning in the fourth quarter 2016.

Management evaluated all other activity of the Company and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements or further disclosure in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

XML

Financial Statements (Policy)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Financial Statements [Abstract]

Basis of presentation [Policy Text Block]

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all estimates and adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  However, actual results could differ from those estimates.  The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.  The year-end Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015 was derived from audited financial statements.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” refer collectively to L.B. Foster Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Recently issued accounting standards [Policy Text Block]

Recently issued accounting standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605, “Revenue Recognition.” ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. It also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating its implementation approach and assessing the impact of ASU 2014-09 on our financial position and results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. The new accounting requirements include the accounting for, presentation of, and classification of leases. The guidance will result in most leases being capitalized as a right of use asset with a related liability on our balance sheets. The requirements of the new standard are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is in the process of analyzing the impact of ASU 2016-02 on our financial position and results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718)." This standard makes several modifications to Topic 718 related to the accounting for forfeitures, employer tax withholding on share-based compensation, and the financial statement presentation of excess tax benefits or deficiencies. ASU 2016-09 also clarifies the statement of cash flows presentation for certain components of share-based awards. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, although early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of analyzing the impact of ASU 2016-09 on our financial position and results of operations.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, “Income Taxes – Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (Topic 740”), which will require an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. The ASU is effective on January 1, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-16 will have on our financial position and results of operations.

XML

Inventories (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Inventories [Abstract]

Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Inventory is generally valued at the lower of last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) cost or market.  Other inventories of the Company are valued at average cost or market, whichever is lower.  An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method is made at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time.  Interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end levels and costs.

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Policy)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Share-based Compensation [Abstract]

Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block]

The Company applies the provisions of FASB ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” to account for the Company’s share-based compensation.  Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award and is recognized over the employees’ requisite service period.

XML

Business Segments (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Business Segments [Abstract]

Reconciliation of Revenue from Segments to Consolidated [Table Text Block]

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30, 2016				September 30, 2016
		Net		Segment		Net		Segment
		Sales		Profit (loss)		Sales		Profit (loss)
Rail Products and Services	$	56,891	$	(2,047)	$	188,686	$	(26,474)
Construction Products		34,870		1,356		107,098		5,748
Tubular and Energy Services		22,883		(6,966)		81,164		(111,876)
Total	$	114,644	$	(7,657)	$	376,948	$	(132,602)

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30, 2015				September 30, 2015
		Net		Segment		Net		Segment
		Sales		Profit (loss)		Sales		Profit (loss)
Rail Products and Services	$	87,972	$	6,984	$	252,530	$	19,469
Construction Products		54,093		4,456		137,899		10,842
Tubular and Energy Services		33,994		(79,873)		94,956		(77,557)
Total	$	176,059	$	(68,433)	$	485,385	$	(47,246)

Reconciliation of Operating Profit (Loss) from Segments to Consolidated [Table Text Block]

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
		2016		2015		2016		2015
Loss for reportable segments	$	(7,657)	$	(68,433)	$	(132,602)	$	(47,246)
Interest expense		(1,520)		(1,265)		(4,342)		(3,166)
Interest income		50		66		157		160
Other income		1,085		537		263		1,245
LIFO income		917		181		1,442		581
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments		(263)		(299)		(946)		(312)
Corporate expense, cost of capital elimination, and other unallocated charges		(1,973)		(989)		(6,907)		(6,974)
Loss before income taxes	$	(9,361)	$	(70,202)	$	(142,935)	$	(55,712)

Reconciliation of Assets from Segment to Consolidated [Table Text Block]

		September 30,		December 31,
		2016		2015
Rail Products and Services	$	155,657	$	241,222
Construction Products		83,061		86,335
Tubular and Energy Services		103,976		216,715
Unallocated corporate assets		68,586		22,388
Total	$	411,280	$	566,660

XML

Acquisitions (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Acquisitions [Abstract]

Schedule of Recognized Identified Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed [Table Text Block]

Allocation of Purchase Price		November 23, 2015 - Tew Plus		March 13, 2015 - IOS			January 13, 2015 - Tew
Current assets	$	4,420	$	19,877		$	12,125
Other assets		-		708			-
Property, plant, and equipment		47		51,453	*		2,398
Goodwill		822		69,908	*		8,772
Other intangibles		1,074		50,354	*		14,048
Liabilities assumed		(3,597)		(23,596)			(6,465)
Total	$	2,766	$	168,704		$	30,878

Schedule of Finite-Lived Intangible Assets Acquired as Part of Business Combination [Table Text Block]

Intangible Asset		November 23, 2015 - Tew Plus		March 13, 2015 - IOS			January 13, 2015 - Tew
Trade name	$	-	$	2,641		$	870
Customer relationships		817		41,171			10,035
Technology		203		4,364			2,480
Non-competition agreements		54		2,178			663
Total identified intangible assets	$	1,074	$	50,354	**	$	14,048

XML

Property, Plant and Equipment (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]

Property, Plant and Equipment [Table Text Block]

		September 30,		December 31,
		2016		2015
Land	$	14,848	$	17,054
Improvements to land and leaseholds		17,626		16,590
Buildings		33,917		39,366
Machinery and equipment, including equipment under capitalized leases		116,355		118,677
Construction in progress		3,598		11,844
		186,344		203,531
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization, including accumulated amortization of capitalized leases		80,197		76,786
	$	106,147	$	126,745

XML

Goodwill and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Goodwill and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets [Abstract]

Schedule of Goodwill [Table Text Block]

		Rail Products and Services		Construction Products		Tubular and Energy Services		Total
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	48,188	$	5,147	$	28,417	$	81,752
Foreign currency translation impact		(1,069)		-		-		(1,069)
Disposition		(154)		-		-		(154)
Impairment charges		(32,725)		-		(28,417)		(61,142)
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	14,240	$	5,147	$	-	$	19,387

Schedule of Intangible Assets [Table Text Block]

		September 30,		December 31,
		2016		2015
Rail Products and Services	$	57,134	$	59,226
Construction Products		1,348		1,348
Tubular and Energy Services		29,179		98,166
	$	87,661	$	158,740

Schedule of Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Table Text Block]

	September 30, 2016
	Weighted Average		Gross				Net
	Amortization Period		Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying
	In Years		Value		Amortization		Amount
Non-compete agreements	5	$	4,252	$	(2,005)	$	2,247
Patents	10		380		(145)		235
Customer relationships	17		37,295		(6,069)		31,226
Trademarks and trade names	14		10,054		(3,036)		7,018
Technology	14		35,680		(10,593)		25,087
		$	87,661	$	(21,848)	$	65,813

	December 31, 2015
	Weighted Average		Gross				Net
	Amortization Period		Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying
	In Years		Value		Amortization		Amount
Non-compete agreements	4	$	6,984	$	(2,495)	$	4,489
Patents	10		378		(124)		254
Customer relationships	16		94,338		(8,441)		85,897
Supplier relationships	5		350		(335)		15
Trademarks and trade names	13		14,252		(3,025)		11,227
Technology	13		42,438		(9,393)		33,045
		$	158,740	$	(23,813)	$	134,927

Schedule of Expected Amortization Expense [Table Text Block]

		Amortization Expense
2016	$	1,780
2017		7,112
2018		7,008
2019		6,276
2020		5,909
2021 and thereafter		37,728
	$	65,813

XML

Inventories (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Inventories [Abstract]

Schedule of Inventory Of Continuing Operations [Table Text Block]

		September 30,		December 31,
		2016		2015
Finished goods	$	54,659	$	62,547
Work-in-process		20,418		20,178
Raw materials		20,683		19,492
Total inventories at current costs		95,760		102,217
Less: LIFO reserve		(4,379)		(5,821)
	$	91,381	$	96,396

XML

Investments (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Investments [Abstract]

Schedule of Variable Interest Entities [Table Text Block]

		September 30,		December 31,
		2016		2015
LB Pipe JV equity method investment	$	4,245	$	5,246
Loan receivable		635		-
Net investment in direct financing lease		899		995
	$	5,779	$	6,241

Schedule of Direct Financing Future Minimum Lease Payments for Capital Leases [Table Text Block]

		Minimum Lease Payments
2016	$	35
2017		140
2018		150
2019		574
	$	899

XML

Long-Term Debt (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Long-Term Debt and Related Matters [Abstract]

Schedule of Long-term Debt Instruments [Table Text Block]

		September 30,		December 31,
		2016		2015
Revolving credit facility	$	132,847	$	165,000
Capital leases and financing agreements		2,778		3,754
Total		135,625		168,754
Less current maturities		1,326		1,335
Long-term portion	$	134,299	$	167,419

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

Schedule of Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis [Table Text Block]

		Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using								Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
		September 30, 2016		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		December 31, 2015		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Term deposits	$	16	$	16	$	-	$	-	$	1,939	$	1,939	$	-	$	-
Total assets	$	16	$	16	$	-	$	-	$	1,939	$	1,939	$	-	$	-
Interest rate swaps	$	2,307	$	-	$	2,307	$	-	$	196	$	-	$	196	$	-
Total liabilities	$	2,307	$	-	$	2,307	$	-	$	196	$	-	$	196	$	-

XML

Earnings Per Common Share (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Earnings Per Common Share [Abstract]

Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted [Table Text Block]

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
		2016		2015		2016		2015
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per common share -
(Loss) available to common stockholders:
Net loss	$	(5,982)	$	(57,422)	$	(100,810)	$	(47,773)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding		10,296		10,256		10,264		10,266
Denominator for basic earnings per common share		10,296		10,256		10,264		10,266
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options		-		-		-		-
Other stock compensation plans		-		-		-		-
Dilutive potential common shares		-		-		-		-
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share - adjusted weighted average shares outstanding and assumed conversions		10,296		10,256		10,264		10,266
Basic loss per common share	$	(0.58)	$	(5.60)	$	(9.82)	$	(4.65)
Diluted loss per common share	$	(0.58)	$	(5.60)	$	(9.82)	$	(4.65)
Dividends paid per common share	$	0.04	$	0.04	$	0.12	$	0.12

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Share-based Compensation [Abstract]

Schedule of Nonvested Share Activity [Table Text Block]

The following table summarizes the restricted stock award and performance unit award activity for the period ended September 30, 2016:

	Restricted	Performance		Weighted Average
	Stock	Stock		Grant Date
	Units	Units		Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2015	93,817	35,999	$	39.66
Granted	48,283	129,844		12.50
Vested	(43,453)	-		29.30
Adjustment for incentive awards not expected to vest	-	(93,103)		24.79
Canceled	(6,021)	(9,050)		18.82
Outstanding at September 30, 2016	92,626	63,690	$	21.88

XML

Retirement Plans (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]

Schedule of Costs of Retirement Plans [Table Text Block]

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
		2016		2015		2016		2015
United States	$	152	$	413	$	1,289	$	1,842
Canada		46		54		164		167
United Kingdom		64		162		281		360
	$	262	$	629	$	1,734	$	2,369

United States Pension Plans of US Entity, Defined Benefit [Member]

Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]

Schedule of Net Benefit Costs [Table Text Block]

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
		2016		2015		2016		2015
Service cost	$	9	$	10	$	27	$	29
Interest cost		186		185		559		555
Expected return on plan assets		(179)		(203)		(538)		(611)
Recognized net actuarial loss		69		69		207		207
Net periodic pension cost	$	85	$	61	$	255	$	180

United Kingdom Benefit Plans [Member]

Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]

Schedule of Net Benefit Costs [Table Text Block]

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
		2016		2015		2016		2015
Interest cost	$	73	$	78	$	223	$	231
Expected return on plan assets		(82)		(83)		(250)		(249)
Amortization of prior service costs and transition amount		5		5		15		15
Recognized net actuarial loss		38		60		116		177
Net periodic pension cost	$	34	$	60	$	104	$	174

XML

Commitments and Contingent Liabilites (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities [Abstract]

Schedule of Product Warranty Liability [Table Text Block]

		Warranty Liability
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	8,755
Additions to warranty liability		961
Warranty liability utilized		(682)
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	9,034

Environmental Loss Contingencies [Table Text Block]

		Environmental liability
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	6,640
Additions to environmental obligations		26
Environmental obligations utilized		(79)
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	6,587

XML

Business Segments (Narrative) (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016
Business Segments [Abstract]
Capital Charges Rate	1.00%

XML

Business Segments (Reconciliation of Significant Reconciling Items) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Net sales	$ 114,644	$ 176,059	$ 376,948	$ 485,385
Segment Profit (Loss)	(7,657)	(68,433)	(132,602)	(47,246)
Rail Products and Services [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Net sales	56,891	87,972	188,686	252,530
Segment Profit (Loss)	(2,047)	6,984	(26,474)	19,469
Construction Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Net sales	34,870	54,093	107,098	137,899
Segment Profit (Loss)	1,356	4,456	5,748	10,842
Tubular and Energy Services [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Net sales	22,883	33,994	81,164	94,956
Segment Profit (Loss)	$ (6,966)	$ (79,873)	$ (111,876)	$ (77,557)

XML

Business Segments (Reconciliation of Operating Profit (Loss) from Segments to Consolidated) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Business Segments [Abstract]
Loss for reportable segments	$ (7,657)	$ (68,433)	$ (132,602)	$ (47,246)
Interest expense	(1,520)	(1,265)	(4,342)	(3,166)
Interest income	50	66	157	160
Other income	1,085	537	263	1,245
LIFO income	917	181	1,442	581
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investment	(263)	(299)	(946)	(312)
Corporate expense, cost of capital elimination and other unallocated charges	(1,973)	(989)	(6,907)	(6,974)
Loss before income taxes	$ (9,361)	$ (70,202)	$ (142,935)	$ (55,712)

XML

Business Segments (Assets by Segment) (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Assets	$ 411,280	$ 566,660
Rail Products and Services [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Assets	155,657	241,222
Construction Products [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Assets	83,061	86,335
Tubular and Energy Services [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Assets	103,976	216,715
Unallocated Corporate Assets [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Assets	$ 68,586	$ 22,388

XML

Acquisitions (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands				9 Months Ended
	Nov. 23, 2015	Mar. 13, 2015	Jan. 13, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Payments to Acquire Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired				$ 0	$ 193,871
TEW Plus LTD [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Business Acquisition, Effective Date of Acquisition	Nov. 23, 2015
Business Acquisition, Percentage of Voting Interests Acquired	75.00%
Business Acquisition, Name of Acquired Entity	TEW Plus, LTD ("Tew Plus")
Payments to Acquire Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired	$ 2,130
Inspection Oilfield Services (IOS) [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Business Acquisition, Effective Date of Acquisition		Mar. 13, 2015
Business Acquisition, Name of Acquired Entity		IOS Holdings, Inc. ("IOS" or "test and inspection services")
Payments to Acquire Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired		$ 167,404
Working capital adjustment		2,363
Earn out provision		60,000
Business Combination, Indemnification Assets, Amount as of Acquisition Date		$ 7,600
TEW Holdings, LTD [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Business Acquisition, Effective Date of Acquisition			Jan. 13, 2015
Business Acquisition, Name of Acquired Entity			Tew Holdings, LTD ("Tew")
Payments to Acquire Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired			$ 26,467
Working capital adjustment			4,200
Business Combination, Indemnification Assets, Amount as of Acquisition Date			$ 600

XML

Acquisitions (Allocation of Purchase Price) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Nov. 23, 2015	Mar. 13, 2015	Jan. 13, 2015
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Goodwill		$ 19,387	$ 81,752
TEW Plus LTD [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Current assets				$ 4,420
Other assets				0
Property, plant and equipment				47
Goodwill				822
Other intangibles				1,074
Liabilities assumed				(3,597)
Total				$ 2,766
Inspection Oilfield Services (IOS) [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Current assets					$ 19,877
Other assets					708
Property, plant and equipment	[1]				51,453
Goodwill	[1]				69,908
Other intangibles	[1],[2]				50,354
Liabilities assumed					(23,596)
Total					$ 168,704
TEW Holdings, LTD [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Current assets						$ 12,125
Other assets						0
Property, plant and equipment						2,398
Goodwill						8,772
Other intangibles						14,048
Liabilities assumed						(6,465)
Total						$ 30,878

[1] As a result of the impact of the downturn within the energy markets, the expectations of a prolonged period before recovery, and the reduction in active U.S. land oil rig count, the Company performed an interim test for impairment of goodwill during the third quarter of 2015 that resulted in the full impairment of goodwill related to the IOS acquisition. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2016, the Company performed an interim impairment test due to further deterioration in projections that resulted in impairment of property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets as described in Notes 4 and 5.

[2] See Note 5 regarding intangible asset impairments.

XML

Acquisitions (Identifiable Intangible Assets Acquired) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		Nov. 23, 2015	Mar. 13, 2015	Jan. 13, 2015
TEW Plus LTD [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets		$ 1,074
TEW Plus LTD [Member] | Trade name [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets		0
TEW Plus LTD [Member] | Customer relationships [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets		817
TEW Plus LTD [Member] | Technology [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets		203
TEW Plus LTD [Member] | Non-competition agreements [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets		$ 54
Inspection Oilfield Services (IOS) [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets	[1],[2]		$ 50,354
Inspection Oilfield Services (IOS) [Member] | Trade name [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets			2,641
Inspection Oilfield Services (IOS) [Member] | Customer relationships [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets			41,171
Inspection Oilfield Services (IOS) [Member] | Technology [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets			4,364
Inspection Oilfield Services (IOS) [Member] | Non-competition agreements [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets			$ 2,178
TEW Holdings, LTD [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets				$ 14,048
TEW Holdings, LTD [Member] | Trade name [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets				870
TEW Holdings, LTD [Member] | Customer relationships [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets				10,035
TEW Holdings, LTD [Member] | Technology [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets				2,480
TEW Holdings, LTD [Member] | Non-competition agreements [Member]
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Fair value estimate of acquired identifiable intangible assets				$ 663

[1] As a result of the impact of the downturn within the energy markets, the expectations of a prolonged period before recovery, and the reduction in active U.S. land oil rig count, the Company performed an interim test for impairment of goodwill during the third quarter of 2015 that resulted in the full impairment of goodwill related to the IOS acquisition. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2016, the Company performed an interim impairment test due to further deterioration in projections that resulted in impairment of property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets as described in Notes 4 and 5.

[2] See Note 5 regarding intangible asset impairments.

XML

Property, Plant and Equipment (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment - gross	$ 186,344		$ 186,344		$ 203,531
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization, including accumulated amortization of capitalized leases	80,197		80,197		76,786
Total property, plant and equipment, net	106,147		106,147		126,745
Asset Impairment	6,946	$ 80,337	135,884	$ 80,337
Tubular and Energy Services [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Asset Impairment			14,956
Land [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment - gross	14,848		14,848		17,054
Improvements To Land And Leaseholds [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment - gross	17,626		17,626		16,590
Buildings [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment - gross	33,917		33,917		39,366
Machinery And Equipment, Including Equipment Under Capitalized Leases [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment - gross	116,355		116,355		118,677
Construction in Progress [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment - gross	$ 3,598		$ 3,598		$ 11,844

XML

Goodwill and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015
Goodwill, Impairment Loss			$ 61,142
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Gross	$ 87,661		87,661		$ 158,740
Amortization of Intangible Assets	1,763	$ 3,337	$ 7,818	$ 8,950
Maximum [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Asset, Useful Life			25 years
Minimum [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Asset, Useful Life			2 years
Weighted Average [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Asset, Useful Life			15 years
Rail Products and Services [Member]
Goodwill, Impairment Loss			$ 32,725
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Gross	57,134		$ 57,134		59,226
Rail Technologies [Member]
Goodwill, Impairment Loss	4,383
Percent of goodwill eliminated			68.00%
Construction Products [Member]
Goodwill, Impairment Loss			$ 0
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Gross	1,348		1,348		1,348
Tubular and Energy Services [Member]
Goodwill, Impairment Loss			28,417
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Gross	29,179		29,179		$ 98,166
Inspection Oilfield Services (IOS) [Member]
Impairment of Intangible Assets, Finite-lived			42,982
Chemtec Energy Services, LLC [Member]
Goodwill, Impairment Loss			61,142
Impairment of Intangible Assets, Finite-lived	$ 2,563		$ 16,804

XML

Goodwill and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets (Schedule of Goodwill) (Details) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($)
Goodwill [Line Items]
Goodwill, Beginning Balance	$ 81,752
Foreign currency translation impact	(1,069)
Disposition	(154)
Impairment charges	(61,142)
Goodwill, Ending Balance	19,387
Rail Products and Services [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Goodwill, Beginning Balance	48,188
Foreign currency translation impact	(1,069)
Disposition	(154)
Impairment charges	(32,725)
Goodwill, Ending Balance	14,240
Construction Products [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Goodwill, Beginning Balance	5,147
Foreign currency translation impact	0
Disposition	0
Impairment charges	0
Goodwill, Ending Balance	5,147
Tubular and Energy Services [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Goodwill, Beginning Balance	28,417
Foreign currency translation impact	0
Disposition	0
Impairment charges	(28,417)
Goodwill, Ending Balance	$ 0

XML

Goodwill and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets (Schedule of Intangible Assets) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Carrying Value	$ 87,661	$ 158,740
Accumulated Amortization	(21,848)	(23,813)
Net Carrying Amount	65,813	134,927
Non-competition agreements [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Carrying Value	4,252	6,984
Accumulated Amortization	(2,005)	(2,495)
Net Carrying Amount	2,247	4,489
Patents [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Carrying Value	380	378
Accumulated Amortization	(145)	(124)
Net Carrying Amount	235	254
Customer relationships [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Carrying Value	37,295	94,338
Accumulated Amortization	(6,069)	(8,441)
Net Carrying Amount	31,226	85,897
Supplier relationships [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Carrying Value		350
Accumulated Amortization		(335)
Net Carrying Amount		15
Trademarks and trade names [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Carrying Value	10,054	14,252
Accumulated Amortization	(3,036)	(3,025)
Net Carrying Amount	7,018	11,227
Technology [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Carrying Value	35,680	42,438
Accumulated Amortization	(10,593)	(9,393)
Net Carrying Amount	$ 25,087	$ 33,045
Weighted Average [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Weighted Average Amortization Period In Years	15 years
Weighted Average [Member] | Non-competition agreements [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Weighted Average Amortization Period In Years	5 years	4 years
Weighted Average [Member] | Patents [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Weighted Average Amortization Period In Years	10 years	10 years
Weighted Average [Member] | Customer relationships [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Weighted Average Amortization Period In Years	17 years	16 years
Weighted Average [Member] | Supplier relationships [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Weighted Average Amortization Period In Years		5 years
Weighted Average [Member] | Trademarks and trade names [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Weighted Average Amortization Period In Years	14 years	13 years
Weighted Average [Member] | Technology [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Weighted Average Amortization Period In Years	14 years	13 years

XML

Goodwill and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets (Schedule of Expected Amortization Expense) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Goodwill and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets [Abstract]
2016	$ 1,780
2017	7,112
2018	7,008
2019	6,276
2020	5,909
2021 and thereafter	37,728
Net Carrying Amount	$ 65,813	$ 134,927

XML

Accounts Receivable (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Accounts Receivable [Abstract]
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable	$ 1,750	$ 1,485

XML

Inventories (Schedule of Inventory) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Inventories [Abstract]
Finished goods	$ 54,659	$ 62,547
Work-in-process	20,418	20,178
Raw materials	20,683	19,492
Total inventories at current costs	95,760	102,217
Less: LIFO reserve	(4,379)	(5,821)
Inventory	$ 91,381	$ 96,396

XML

Investments (Narrative) (Details) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) a property	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) a property	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015 USD ($)
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Equity Investments	$ 4,374		$ 4,374		$ 5,321
Equity in Income/(Loss) of Nonconsolidated Investment	(263)	$ (299)	(946)	$ (312)
Proceeds from Equity Method Investment, Dividends or Distributions, Return of Capital			0	90
LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Equity Investments	$ 4,245		$ 4,245		5,246
Equity Method Investment, Ownership Percentage	45.00%		45.00%
Equity Method Investment, Description of Principal Activities			The Company is a member of a joint venture, LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC ("LB Pipe JV"), in which it maintains a 45% ownership interest. LB Pipe JV manufactures, markets, and sells various precision coupling products for the energy, utility, and construction markets and is scheduled to terminate on June 30, 2019.
Equity in Income/(Loss) of Nonconsolidated Investment	$ 276	$ 292	$ 1,001	$ 289
Line of credit, maximum lending capacity	750		750
Due from Joint Ventures, Current	635		635
Other equity investments [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Equity Investments	$ 129		$ 129		$ 75
Capital Leased Land [Member] | LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Area of Land | a	5		5
Capital Leased Assets, Number of Units | property	2		2
Capital Lease Length Of Renewal Term			5 years 6 months
Capital Leases, Monthly Rent			$ 17
Capital Leases Balloon Payment In Direct Financing Leases	$ 488		$ 488
Variable Interest Entity, Not Primary Beneficiary, Aggregated Disclosure [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Variable Interest Entity, Methodology for Determining Whether Entity is Primary Beneficiary			Under applicable guidance for variable interest entities in ASC 810, "Consolidation," the Company determined that the LB Pipe JV is a variable interest entity. The Company concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity, as the Company does not have a controlling financial interest and does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the LB Pipe JV. Accordingly, the Company concluded that the equity method of accounting remains appropriate.

XML

Investments (Schedule Of Carrying Amount And Maximum Loss Exposure Of Equity Investments) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Maximum exposure to loss	$ 5,779	$ 6,241
LB Pipe JV equity method investment [Member] | LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Maximum exposure to loss	4,245	5,246
Loan receivable [Member] | LB Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Maximum exposure to loss	635	0
Net investment in direct financing lease [Member]
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Maximum exposure to loss	$ 899	$ 995

XML

Investments (Schedule of Direct Financing Future Minimum Lease Payments for Capital Leases Table) (Details) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($)
Investments [Abstract]
2016	$ 35
2017	140
2018	150
2019	574
Capital Leases, Future Minimum Payments Receivable, Total	$ 899

XML

Long-Term Debt (Schedule Of Long-Term Debt Table) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Long-Term Debt and Related Matters [Abstract]
Revolving credit facility	$ 132,847	$ 165,000
Capital leases and financing agreements	2,778	3,754
Total	135,625	168,754
Less current maturities	1,326	1,335
Long-term portion	$ 134,299	$ 167,419

XML

Long-Term Debt (Narrative - United States) (Details) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands		3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jun. 29, 2016 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2015 $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2015 $ / shares	Dec. 31, 2015 USD ($)	Mar. 13, 2015 USD ($)
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Dividends				$ 1,244
Dividends paid per common share | $ / shares		$ 0.04	$ 0.04	$ 0.12	$ 0.12
Line of Credit Facility, Amount Outstanding		$ 132,847		$ 132,847		$ 165,000
Foreign subsidiaries [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Short-term Debt		26,000		$ 26,000
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity	$ 275,000						$ 335,000
Debt Instrument, Restrictive Covenants				The First Amendment provides that liens on the collateral will be released upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including the submission by the loan parties of a compliance certificate for two consecutive fiscal quarters, calculated for the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ending, each evidencing a Leverage Ratio (defined as the Company's indebtedness less cash on hand in excess of $15,000, divided by the Company's consolidated EBITDA) of less than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00; provided that the last day of such two consecutive fiscal quarters cannot be earlier than June 30, 2018.Certain financial covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were also amended. The First Amendment revises the maximum Leverage Ratio, which must not exceed the amounts set forth below for applicable fiscal quarters: June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016, 4.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2016, 4.50 to 1.00; March 31, 2017, 4.25 to 1.00; June 30, 2017, 4.00 to 1.00; September 30, 2017, 3.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2017, 3.50 to 1.00; and March 31, 2018 and all fiscal quarters ending thereafter, 3.25 to 1.00. At September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as revised by the First Amendment.Loans and advances to non-loan parties and loans, advances, and investments by domestic loan parties to subsidiaries that are not loan parties and to foreign loan parties is not permitted to exceed $10,000 in the aggregate at any one time, provided that, on March 31, 2018, when the Maximum Leverage Ratio requirement is 3.25 to 1.00, this limit will increase to $75,000.
Leverage ratio	4.75
Leverage ratio in effect for the second quarter of a credit agreement	4.75
Leverage ratio in effect for the third quarter of a credit agreement	4.50
Leverage ratio in effect for the fourth quarter of a credit agreement	4.25
Leverage ratio in effect for the fifth quarter of a credit agreement	4.00
Leverage ratio in effect for the sixth quarter of a credit agreement	3.75
Leverage ratio in effect for the seventh quarter of a credit agreement	3.50
Leverage ratio in effect for the eighth quarter and remainder of a credit agreement	3.25			3.25
Loans and advances limit	$ 10,000
Loans and advances limit thereafter	75,000
Line of Credit Facility, Dividend Restrictions				The First Amendment permits the Company to pay dividends, distributions, and make redemptions with respect to its stock provided no event of default or potential default (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) has occurred prior to or after giving effect to the dividend, distribution, or redemption. Dividends, distributions, and redemptions are capped at $4,000 per year when funds are drawn on the facility until March 31, 2018, when the maximum Leverage Ratio requirement is 3.25 to 1.00, at which time this limit will increase to $25,000. Dividends of $1,244 or $0.12 per share were distributed for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016.If no drawings on the facility exist, dividends, distributions, and redemptions in excess of $4,000 (or $25,000, as appropriate) per year are subjected to a limitation of $75,000 in the aggregate. The $75,000 aggregate limitation also permits certain loans, investments, and acquisitions. The First Amendment provides that each of the loan parties and their subsidiaries shall not enter into any merger, consolidation, or other reorganization, or acquire all or substantially all of the assets, division, business, stock, or other ownership interests or permit any consolidation or merger with an aggregate consideration in excess of $12,000 until after March 31, 2018.
Maximum dividends, distributions, or redemptions allowed	4,000
Maximum dividends, distributions, or redemptions allowed thereafter	25,000
Maximum dividends, distributions, or redemptions allowed, no draws	75,000
Maximum acquisition	$ 12,000
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Maximum leverage ratio allowed for collateral release	2.75
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Federal Funds Rate [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate	0.50%
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Euro-rate [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate	1.00%
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Euro-rate [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate	1.25%
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Euro-rate [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate	3.25%
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Base Rate [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate	0.025%
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Base Rate [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate	2.25%
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Line of Credit Facility, Interest Rate Description				Borrowings under the First Amendment bear interest at rates based upon either the base rate or Euro-rate plus applicable margins. Applicable margins are dictated by the ratio of the Company's indebtedness less consolidated cash on hand to the Company's consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the underlying Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The base rate is the highest of (a) PNC Bank's prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or (c) the daily Euro-rate (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) plus 1.00%. The base rate and Euro-rate spreads range from 0.025% to 2.25% and 1.25% to 3.25%, respectively.
Line of Credit Facility, Amount Outstanding		425		$ 425
Line of Credit Facility, Current Borrowing Capacity		$ 141,728		$ 141,728
Line of Credit Facility, Expiration Date	Mar. 13, 2020

XML

Long-Term Debt (Narrative - United Kingdom) (Details) £ in Thousands, $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 GBP (£)	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015 USD ($)
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Line of Credit Facility, Amount Outstanding		$ 132,847	$ 165,000
NatWest Bank [Member] | Base Rate [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate	1.50%
NatWest Bank [Member] | Foreign Line of Credit [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity	£ 1,500	1,946
Line of Credit Facility, Collateral	This credit facility supports the subsidiary's working capital requirements and is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of its United Kingdom operations.
Line of Credit Facility, Interest Rate Description	. The interest rate on this facility is the financial institution's base rate plus 1.50%.
Line of Credit Facility, Amount Outstanding		0
Line of Credit Facility, Current Borrowing Capacity		1,635
NatWest Bank Outstanding Guarantees [Member] | Foreign Line of Credit [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Line of Credit Facility, Amount Outstanding		$ 311

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Schedule of Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Assets, Fair Value Disclosure	$ 16	$ 1,939
Interest rate swap	2,307	196
Total Liabilities	2,307	196
Swap [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Derivative, Notional Amount	50,000
Non domestic bank certificates of deposit [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents	16	1,939
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Assets, Fair Value Disclosure	16	1,939
Interest rate swap	0	0
Total Liabilities	0	0
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member] | Non domestic bank certificates of deposit [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents	16	1,939
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Assets, Fair Value Disclosure	0	0
Interest rate swap	2,307	196
Total Liabilities	2,307	196
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member] | Non domestic bank certificates of deposit [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents	0	0
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Assets, Fair Value Disclosure	0	0
Interest rate swap	0	0
Total Liabilities	0	0
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member] | Non domestic bank certificates of deposit [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Earning Per Common Share (Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted) (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Earnings Per Common Share [Abstract]
Net loss	$ (5,982)	$ (57,422)	$ (100,810)	$ (47,773)
Weighted average shares outstanding	10,296,000	10,256,000	10,264,000	10,266,000
Denominator for basic earnings per common share	10,296,000	10,256,000	10,264,000	10,266,000
Employee stock options	0	0	0	0
Other stock compensation plans	0	0	0	0
Dilutive potential common shares	0	0	0	0
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share - adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions	10,296,000	10,256,000	10,264,000	10,266,000
Basic loss per common share	$ (0.58)	$ (5.60)	$ (9.82)	$ (4.65)
Diluted loss per common share	(0.58)	(5.60)	(9.82)	(4.65)
Dividends paid per common share	$ 0.04	$ 0.04	$ 0.12	$ 0.12
Antidilutive shares excluded from computation of earnings per share	34	48	80	81

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended			9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Mar. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Share-based compensation	$ 320	$ (514)		$ 875	$ 1,382
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Nonvested Awards, Compensation Cost Not yet Recognized	$ 1,955			$ 1,955
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Nonvested Awards, Compensation Cost Not yet Recognized, Period for Recognition				4 years
Excess income tax (deficiency) benefit from share-based compensation				$ (124)	$ 289
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Number	0			0
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Exercises in Period			7,500
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Grants in Period, Gross				0	0
Share-based Compensation Arrangements by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Exercises in Period, Weighted Average Exercise Price			$ 9.08
The Omnibus Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Number of Additional Shares Authorized				370,000
The Omnibus Plan [Member] | Restricted Stock And Performance Shares Combined [Member] | Vesting Period 1 [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Period				4 years
The Omnibus Plan [Member] | Restricted Stock And Performance Shares Combined [Member] | Vesting Period 2 [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Period				3 years

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Restricted Stock and Performance Unit Awards) (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 $ / shares shares
Restricted Stock [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Nonvested Shares, Outstanding, Beginning Balance	93,817
Granted	48,283
Vested	(43,453)
Adjustment for incentive awards not expected to vest	0
Canceled	(6,021)
Nonvested Shares, Outstanding, Ending Balance	92,626
Performance Shares [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Nonvested Shares, Outstanding, Beginning Balance	35,999
Granted	129,844
Vested	0
Adjustment for incentive awards not expected to vest	93,103
Canceled	(9,050)
Nonvested Shares, Outstanding, Ending Balance	63,690
Restricted Stock And Performance Shares Combined [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Nonvested Shares, Beginning Balance, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | $ / shares	$ 39.66
Granted, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | $ / shares	12.50
Vested, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | $ / shares	29.30
Adjustment for incentive awards not expected to vest, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | $ / shares	24.79
Canceled, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | $ / shares	18.82
Nonvested Shares, Ending Balance, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | $ / shares	$ 21.88

XML

Retirement Plans (Narrative) (Details) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) contract
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Defined Contribution Plan Number	8
Description of Postemployment Benefits	The Company sponsors eight defined contribution plans for hourly and salaried employees across our domestic and international facilities. The following table summarizes the expense associated with the contributions made to these plans.
UNITED STATES
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Number of retirement plans	7
Defined Benefit Plan Number	3
Active Defined Benefit Plan Number	1
Inactive Defined Benefit Plan Number	2
Defined Contribution Plan Number	4
Defined Benefit Plans, Estimated Future Employer Contributions in Current Fiscal Year | $	$ 0
CANADA
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Defined Contribution Plan Number	2
Post-retirement benefit plan number	1
UNITED KINGDOM
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Defined Benefit Plan Number	1
Defined Contribution Plan Number	2
Defined Benefit Plans, Estimated Future Employer Contributions in Current Fiscal Year | $	$ 240
Defined Benefit Plan, Contributions by Employer | $	$ 180

XML

Retirement Plans (Schedule Of Net Periodic Benefit Costs) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
UNITED STATES
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Service cost	$ 9	$ 10	$ 27	$ 29
Interest cost	186	185	559	555
Expected return on plan assets	(179)	(203)	(538)	(611)
Recognized net actuarial loss	(69)	(69)	(207)	(207)
Net periodic pension cost	85	61	255	180
UNITED KINGDOM
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Interest cost	73	78	223	231
Expected return on plan assets	(82)	(83)	(250)	(249)
Amortization of prior service cost and transition amount	5	5	15	15
Recognized net actuarial loss	(38)	(60)	(116)	(177)
Net periodic pension cost	$ 34	$ 60	$ 104	$ 174

XML

Retirement Plans (Defined Contribution Plans) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Defined Contribution Plan, Cost Recognized	$ 262	$ 629	$ 1,734	$ 2,369
UNITED STATES
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Defined Contribution Plan, Cost Recognized	152	413	1,289	1,842
CANADA
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Defined Contribution Plan, Cost Recognized	46	54	164	167
UNITED KINGDOM
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Defined Contribution Plan, Cost Recognized	$ 64	$ 162	$ 281	$ 360

XML

Commitments and Contingent Liabilites (Narrative) (Details) $ in Thousands, item in Millions	12 Months Ended		168 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2012 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2011 item	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015 USD ($)
Product Liability Contingency [Line Items]
Concrete Ties Manufactured | item			3.0
Standard Product Warranty Accrual				$ 9,034	$ 8,755
Accrual for Environmental Loss Contingencies				6,587	6,640
Reserve for Concrete Ties [Member]
Product Liability Contingency [Line Items]
Litigation Settlement, Amount		$ 12,000
Product Warranty Expense		$ 22,000
Standard Product Warranty Accrual				$ 7,460	$ 7,544
Standard Product Warranty Accrual, Period Increase (Decrease)	$ 8,766
The UPRR [Member]
Product Liability Contingency [Line Items]
Concrete Ties Manufactured | item			1.6

XML

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Schedule of Product Warranty Liability) (Details) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($)
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities [Abstract]
Balance, Beginning	$ 8,755
Additions to warranty liability	961
Warranty liability utilized	(682)
Balance, Ending	$ 9,034

XML

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Environmental Liability) (Details) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($)
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities [Abstract]
Environmental liability, beginning balance	$ 6,640
Additions to environmental obligations	26
Environmental obligations utilized	(79)
Environmental liability, ending balance	$ 6,587

XML

Income Taxes (Reconciliation Of Income Tax Rates) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Income Taxes [Abstract]
Statutory rate			35.00%	35.00%
Asset Impairment	$ 6,946	$ 80,337	$ 135,884	$ 80,337
Impairment of assets, tax benefit	$ 1,000		$ 39,038
Effective income tax rate	36.10%	18.20%	29.50%	14.30%

XML

Subsequent Events (Narrative) (Details) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Subsequent Event [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Severance Costs	$ 1,000

XML

Subsequent Event (Credit Agreement) (Detail) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands			3 Months Ended			9 Months Ended
	Nov. 07, 2016 USD ($)	Jun. 29, 2016 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2015 $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2015 $ / shares	Mar. 13, 2015 USD ($)
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Dividends						$ 1,244
Dividends paid per common share | $ / shares				$ 0.04	$ 0.04	$ 0.12	$ 0.12
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity		$ 275,000						$ 335,000
Debt Instrument, Restrictive Covenants						The First Amendment provides that liens on the collateral will be released upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including the submission by the loan parties of a compliance certificate for two consecutive fiscal quarters, calculated for the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ending, each evidencing a Leverage Ratio (defined as the Company's indebtedness less cash on hand in excess of $15,000, divided by the Company's consolidated EBITDA) of less than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00; provided that the last day of such two consecutive fiscal quarters cannot be earlier than June 30, 2018.Certain financial covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were also amended. The First Amendment revises the maximum Leverage Ratio, which must not exceed the amounts set forth below for applicable fiscal quarters: June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016, 4.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2016, 4.50 to 1.00; March 31, 2017, 4.25 to 1.00; June 30, 2017, 4.00 to 1.00; September 30, 2017, 3.75 to 1.00; December 31, 2017, 3.50 to 1.00; and March 31, 2018 and all fiscal quarters ending thereafter, 3.25 to 1.00. At September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the covenants in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as revised by the First Amendment.Loans and advances to non-loan parties and loans, advances, and investments by domestic loan parties to subsidiaries that are not loan parties and to foreign loan parties is not permitted to exceed $10,000 in the aggregate at any one time, provided that, on March 31, 2018, when the Maximum Leverage Ratio requirement is 3.25 to 1.00, this limit will increase to $75,000.
Leverage ratio		4.75
Leverage ratio in seventh quarter		3.50
Leverage ratio in effect for the eighth quarter and remainder of a credit agreement		3.25				3.25
Loans and advances limit		$ 10,000
Loans and advances limit thereafter		75,000
Line of Credit Facility, Dividend Restrictions						The First Amendment permits the Company to pay dividends, distributions, and make redemptions with respect to its stock provided no event of default or potential default (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) has occurred prior to or after giving effect to the dividend, distribution, or redemption. Dividends, distributions, and redemptions are capped at $4,000 per year when funds are drawn on the facility until March 31, 2018, when the maximum Leverage Ratio requirement is 3.25 to 1.00, at which time this limit will increase to $25,000. Dividends of $1,244 or $0.12 per share were distributed for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016.If no drawings on the facility exist, dividends, distributions, and redemptions in excess of $4,000 (or $25,000, as appropriate) per year are subjected to a limitation of $75,000 in the aggregate. The $75,000 aggregate limitation also permits certain loans, investments, and acquisitions. The First Amendment provides that each of the loan parties and their subsidiaries shall not enter into any merger, consolidation, or other reorganization, or acquire all or substantially all of the assets, division, business, stock, or other ownership interests or permit any consolidation or merger with an aggregate consideration in excess of $12,000 until after March 31, 2018.
Maximum dividends, distributions, or redemptions allowed		4,000
Maximum dividends, distributions, or redemptions allowed thereafter		25,000
Maximum dividends, distributions, or redemptions allowed, no draws		75,000
Maximum acquisition		12,000
Maximum asset sales allowed		25,000
Carryover of asset sales allowed		$ 15,000
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Federal Funds Rate [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate		0.50%
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Euro-rate [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate		1.00%
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Euro-rate [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate		1.25%
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Euro-rate [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate		3.25%
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Base Rate [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate		0.025%
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Base Rate [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate		2.25%
PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Line of Credit Facility, Interest Rate Description						Borrowings under the First Amendment bear interest at rates based upon either the base rate or Euro-rate plus applicable margins. Applicable margins are dictated by the ratio of the Company's indebtedness less consolidated cash on hand to the Company's consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the underlying Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The base rate is the highest of (a) PNC Bank's prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or (c) the daily Euro-rate (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) plus 1.00%. The base rate and Euro-rate spreads range from 0.025% to 2.25% and 1.25% to 3.25%, respectively.
Line of Credit Facility, Current Borrowing Capacity				$ 141,728		$ 141,728
Line of Credit Facility, Expiration Date		Mar. 13, 2020
Subsequent Event [Member] | PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity	$ 195,000
Line of Credit Facility, Interest Rate Description	The Second Amendment provides for the elimination of the three lowest tiers of the pricing grid that had previously been defined in the First Amendment. Upon execution of the Second Amendment through the quarter ended March 31, 2018, the Company will be locked into the highest tier of the pricing grid which provides for pricing of the prime rate plus 225 basis points on base rate loans and the applicable LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points on euro rate loans. For each quarter after March 31, 2018 and through the maturity date of the credit facility, the Company's position on the pricing grid will be governed by a Minimum Net Leverage ratio which is the ratio of Consolidated Indebtedness less cash on hand in excess of $15,000 to EBITDA. If, after March 31, 2018 the Minimum Net Leverage ratio positions the Company on the lowest tier of the pricing grid, pricing will be the prime rate plus 150 basis points on base rate loans or the applicable LIBOR rate plus 250 basis points on euro rate loans.
Debt Instrument, Restrictive Covenants	The Second Amendment further provides for modifications to the financial covenants as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Second Amendment calls for the elimination of the Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant through the quarter ended June 30, 2018. After that period, the Maximum Gross Leverage Ratio covenant will be reinstated to require a maximum ratio of 4.25 Consolidated Indebtedness to 1.00 Gross Leverage for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, and 3.75 to 1.00 for all periods thereafter until the maturity date of the credit facility. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Last Twelve Months EBITDA covenant ("Minimum EBITDA"). For the quarter ending December 31, 2016 through the quarter ending June 30, 2017, the Minimum EBITDA must be at least $18,500. For each quarter thereafter, through the quarter ended June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will increase by various increments. At June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will be $31,000. After the quarter ended June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA covenant will be eliminated through the maturity of the credit agreement. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant. The covenant represents the ratio of the Company's fixed charges to the last twelve months of EBITDA, and is required to be a minimum of 1.00 to 1.00 through the quarter ended December 31, 2017 and 1.25 to 1.00 for each quarter thereafter through the maturity of the credit facility. The final financial covenant included in the Second Amendment is a Minimum Liquidity covenant which calls for a minimum of $25,000 in undrawn availability on the revolving credit loan at all times through the quarter ended June 30, 2018.The Second Amendment includes several changes to certain non-financial covenants as defined in the Credit Agreement. Through the maturity date of the loan, the Company is now prohibited from making any future acquisitions. The limitation on permitted annual distributions of dividends or redemptions of the Company's stock has been decreased from $4,000 to $1,700. The aggregate limitation on loans to and investments in non-loan parties was decreased from $10,000 to $5,000. Furthermore, the limitation on asset sales has been decreased from $25,000 annually with a carryover of up to $15,000 from the prior year to $25,000 in the aggregate through the maturity date of the credit facility.
Leverage ratio in seventh quarter	4.25
Leverage ratio in effect for the eighth quarter and remainder of a credit agreement	3.75
Loans and advances limit	$ 5,000
Line of Credit Facility, Dividend Restrictions	The limitation on permitted annual distributions of dividends or redemptions of the Company's stock has been decreased from $4,000 to $1,700.
Maximum asset sales allowed	$ 25,000
Carryover of asset sales allowed	0
Charge for unamortized deferred financing fees			$ 500
Subsequent Event [Member] | PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
EBITDA required	18,500
EBITDA required for seventh quarter	$ 31,000
Fixed charge coverage ratio	1.00
Fixed charge coverage ratio after fifth quarter	1.25
Liquidity covenant	$ 25,000
Subsequent Event [Member] | PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Maximum dividends, distributions, or redemptions allowed	$ 1,700
Subsequent Event [Member] | PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Euro-rate [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate	2.50%
Subsequent Event [Member] | PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Euro-rate [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate	3.25%
Subsequent Event [Member] | PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Base Rate [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate	1.50%
Subsequent Event [Member] | PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Base Rate [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate	2.25%
Subsequent Event [Member] | PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company [Member] | Term loan [Member]
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Line of Credit Facility, Provision for Increase in Capacity	$ 30,000
Line of Credit Facility, Expiration Date	Jan. 01, 2020