XML 46 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Note 10 - Tarsa
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Related Party Transactions Disclosure [Text Block]
10. Tarsa

In October 2009, we licensed our Phase 3 oral calcitonin program (“the Program”) to Tarsa Therapeutics, Inc. (“Tarsa”), a private company formed by a syndicate of three venture capital funds specializing in the life sciences: MVM Life Science Partners, Quaker BioVentures and Novo A/S. Simultaneously, Tarsa announced the closing of a $24,000,000 Series A financing from the investor syndicate.

In consideration for our sale to Tarsa of an exclusive license for the Program, we received from Tarsa approximately $8,993,000 in cash and 9,215,000 shares of common stock in Tarsa, which initially represented a 26% ownership on a non-diluted basis (see below). The cash consideration was derived based upon the expenses we had incurred for the Program. We valued the common stock at $0.23 per share or a total of $2,119,000 with the assistance of an outside valuation firm, and we accounted for this as an equity method investment as of December 31, 2009. These shares are pledged as security under the Victory Park loans.

Tarsa was solely responsible for the future costs of the global Phase 3 clinical trials of the Program that was initiated in 2009 and completed in the first quarter of 2011. We are eligible to receive up to $3,000,000 in milestone payments based on the achievement of certain sales benchmarks, as well as royalties, at rates in the single digits, on product sales. We have no further cash or non-cash obligations to Tarsa or the Program.

As of the effective date of the agreement, Tarsa is responsible for all expenses incurred related to the Program, thus no additional expenses will be incurred by us related to the clinical study, except as agreed upon in subsequent statement of works. Furthermore, we note there is no joint development or steering committee between us and Tarsa related to the manufacturing and development of Phase 3 and future product. Any additional involvement by Unigene requires a separate statement of works to be negotiated and executed.

As an equity method investment, we are required to recognize our proportionate share of Tarsa’s earnings and losses.  Our 2009 operations include a loss of $2,119,000, which represented our proportionate share of Tarsa’s loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 of $3,795,000, which exceeded the amount of our investment in Tarsa. The loss reduced our investment in Tarsa to zero.

We recognized approximately $1,293,000 and $1,007,000 of revenue, for development, testing and other services performed for Tarsa under statements of work in 2011 and 2010, respectively.

On March 24, 2011, we announced that statistically significant top-line results from Tarsa’s Phase 3 ORACAL study of oral calcitonin for postmenopausal osteoporosis validate our proprietary oral peptide drug delivery technology.  The ORACAL study achieved its primary endpoint that was agreed with the FDA through a formalized Special Protocol Assessment (“SPA”) process.  On September 19, 2011, we announced that Tarsa presented positive Phase 3 data from its ORACAL trial of OSTORATM during the annual American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) 2011 meeting.  The data demonstrated that OSTORA achieved all of the efficacy endpoints in the trial and indicated that the safety profile of OSTORA did not substantially differ from nasal calcitonin or placebo.

We also announced in April 2011 that Tarsa had selected us to conduct the stability testing for its oral calcitonin and has agreed to pay us $1.04 million for these services.  The stability testing results will be included in Tarsa’s NDA to be filed with the FDA in the second half of 2012.  

On April 8, 2011, along with the founding investors of Tarsa, we entered into an agreement to purchase $1,518,000 in convertible promissory notes and warrants (the “Purchase Agreement”) from Tarsa to help fund Tarsa’s business operations into the first half of 2012.  After recording this investment in Tarsa, we recognized our proportionate share of Tarsa’s accumulated losses which exceeded the book value of our investment and, as a result, reduced the book value of our investment in Tarsa to zero.  This investment maintained our fully-diluted ownership of Tarsa at approximately 20% (subject to liquidating preferences), taking into account a prior financing in 2010 (in which we did not participate) as well as outstanding stock options.  In addition, pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, Tarsa’s three founding investors may elect to purchase additional convertible promissory notes and warrants from Tarsa in one or more closings to occur between the April 8, 2011 closing date and December 2011 (the “Subsequent Closings”).  If we do not purchase our pro rata portion of such additional securities in those Subsequent Closings, our outstanding principal and accrued interest under the notes previously purchased will mandatorily, automatically convert into shares of Tarsa common stock at the then current conversion price for the Series A Preferred Stock set forth in Tarsa’s certificate of incorporation, as amended from time to time.  Therefore, on July 8, 2011, we entered into another Purchase Agreement and we invested an additional $1,301,000 in Tarsa convertible promissory notes and warrants.  After recording this investment in Tarsa, we recognized our proportionate share of Tarsa’s accumulated losses and reduced our investment in Tarsa to zero.  As of December 31, 2011, we owned an approximate 20% interest in Tarsa (on a fully-diluted basis), subject to liquidating preferences and future dilution.  In January 2012, we purchased additional convertible promissory notes with an aggregate original principal amount of $650,571 and additional warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 67,435 shares of Series A Preferred Stock.  In March 2012, our fully-diluted ownership in Tarsa was reduced to approximately 16% (see Note 28).