XML 62 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements

FASB ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. It does not create or modify any current GAAP requirements to apply fair value accounting. However, it provides a single definition for fair value that is to be applied consistently for all prior accounting pronouncements.

Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, bank borrowings, and senior notes. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the highly liquid or short-term nature of these instruments.

Based upon quoted market prices as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the fair value and carrying value of our senior notes was as follows (in millions):
 
December 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Value
7.125% senior notes due in 2017
$
256.7

 
$
250.0

 
$
258.1

 
$
250.0

 
$
254.8

 
$
250.0

8.875% senior notes due in 2020
$
239.1

 
$
222.4

 
$
244.4

 
$
222.1

 
$
239.6

 
$
221.9

7.875% senior notes due in 2022
$
409.0

 
$
404.9

 
$
424.0

 
$
405.4

 
$
252.8

 
$
247.9



Our senior notes due in 2017, 2020 and 2022 are stated at carrying value on our financial statements, net of any discount or premium. If we recorded these notes at fair value they would be Level 1 in our fair value hierarchy as they are traded in an active market with quoted prices for identical instruments.

At December 31, 2012, the Company did not have any derivative instruments. The following table presents our assets that are measured at fair value as of December 31, 2013, and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy. For additional discussion related to the fair value of the Company's derivatives, refer to Note 1 of these consolidated financial statements. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine the fair value (in millions):
 
Fair Value Measurements at
 
Total
 
Quoted Prices in
Active markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
 (Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
December 31, 2013
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Natural Gas Derivatives
$
0.5

 
$

 
$
0.5

 
$

   Oil Derivatives
$
0.3

 
$

 
$
0.3

 
$

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Natural Gas Derivatives
$
0.7

 
$

 
$
0.7

 
$

   Oil Derivatives
$
0.2

 
$

 
$
0.2

 
$



Our derivative assets and liabilities in the table above are measured at gross fair value and are shown on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in “Other current assets” and "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities", respectively.

Level 1 – Uses quoted prices in active markets for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. Instruments in this category have comparable fair values for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 – Uses quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or observable inputs for assets or liabilities in non-active markets. Instruments in this category are periodically verified against quotes from brokers and include our commodity derivatives that we value using commonly accepted industry-standard models which contain inputs such as contract prices, risk-free rates, volatility measurements and other observable market data that are obtained from independent third-party sources.

Level 3 – Uses unobservable inputs for assets or liabilities that are in non-active markets. We do not have any assets or liabilities in this category that are not supported by market activity and have significant unobservable inputs.