XML 30 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Accounting for and Classification of Discontinued Operations
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Accounting for and Classification of Discontinued Operations [Abstract] 
Accounting for and Classification of Discontinued Operations
(5)
Accounting for and Classification of Discontinued Operations: As required by FASB ASC Subtopic 205-20, Discontinued Operations, the sales of certain income-producing assets are classified as discontinued operations if (i) the operations and cash flows of the component have been, or will be, eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company as a result of the disposal transaction and (ii) the Company will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction. Certain income-producing properties that are classified as “held for sale” under the requirements of FASB ASC Subtopic 205-20, are also treated as discontinued operations. Depreciation on these assets ceases upon their classification as “held-for-sale.” Discontinued operations includes the results for properties that were sold through September 30, 2011 and, if applicable, the operating results of properties still owned, but meeting the definition of “discontinued operations” under FASB ASC Subtopic 205-20. Operating results included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and the segment results (Note 10) for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 have been restated to reflect property that was classified as discontinued operations subsequent to September 30, 2010. Sales of land, residential units, and office condominium units are generally considered inventory and are not included in discontinued operations.

In August 2011, the Company finalized a decision to terminate Matson's CLX2 service, due to the longer-term outlook for sustained high fuel prices and increasingly volatile Transpacific rates. As of the termination date, the Company had established and approved plans to (i) return to lessors or sub-charter the five vessels used in the service (ii) off-hire or dispose of certain excess container equipment and (iii) terminate office contracts and employees. These plans were substantially completed as of September 30, 2011; however, the off-hiring of excess leased containers is expected to continue through 2012 and two of the five ships are expected to be sub-chartered until they are returned to the lessors in July 2012. The remaining three ships were returned to the lessors as of September 30, 2011 pursuant to the terms of the one-year charter contacts for these vessels. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had recorded a liability of $7.2 million, representing the fair value of the obligations arising from exit activities associated with the termination of the service. The liability, which is principally related to future charter lease payments, net of sub-charter revenue, is expected to be substantially settled by July 31, 2012. There were no material assets owned by the Company that were associated with the CLX2 service at September 30, 2011. The revenue included in discontinued operations was $22.0 million and $5.7 million for the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $92.6 million and $5.7 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Income (losses) from discontinued operations consisted of the following (in millions):

   
Quarter Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
   
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
                                 
Discontinued operations (net of tax):
                               
Sales of real estate assets
 
$
4.3
   
$
0.4
   
$
13.8
   
$
19.5
 
Real estate leasing operations
   
0.1
     
1.0
     
0.8
     
3.2
 
CLX2 operating and shutdown losses
   
(14.0
)
   
(1.3
)
   
(33.1
)
   
(1.3
)
Total
 
$
(9.6
)
 
$
0.1
   
$
(18.5
)
 
$
21.4
 

 
In addition to the above losses classified as discontinued operations, the Company incurred approximately $3.7 million, net of tax, in additional costs that did not meet the criteria to be classified as discontinued operations. These costs were primarily related to the repositioning of excess containers that will continue to be used in the Company's ongoing operations.