XML 51 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
6. Property and Casualty Insurance Activity
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements  
6. Property and Casualty Insurance Activity

Premiums Earned

 

Premiums written, ceded and earned are as follows:

    Direct     Assumed     Ceded     Net  
                         
Nine months ended September 30, 2014                        
 Premiums written   $ 56,729,057     $ 39,263     $ (24,013,732 )   $ 32,754,588  
 Change in unearned premiums     (7,311,116 )     (6,082 )     (3,186,706 )     (10,503,904 )
 Premiums earned   $ 49,417,941     $ 33,181     $ (27,200,438 )   $ 22,250,684  
                                 
Nine months ended September 30, 2013                                
 Premiums written   $ 44,651,570     $ 36,999     $ (26,567,984 )   $ 18,120,585  
 Change in unearned premiums     (5,465,632 )     17,377       2,752,751       (2,695,504 )
 Premiums earned   $ 39,185,938     $ 54,376     $ (23,815,233 )   $ 15,425,081  
                                 
Three months ended September 30, 2014                                
 Premiums written   $ 20,131,112     $ 22,961     $ (2,485,929 )   $ 17,668,144  
 Change in unearned premiums     (2,438,306 )     (12,433 )     (5,322,405 )     (7,773,144 )
 Premiums earned   $ 17,692,806     $ 10,528     $ (7,808,334 )   $ 9,895,000  
                                 
Three months ended September 30, 2013                                
 Premiums written   $ 15,925,613     $ 16,952     $ (8,786,730 )   $ 7,155,835  
 Change in unearned premiums     (2,013,499 )     (11,192 )     994,440       (1,030,251 )
 Premiums earned   $ 13,912,114     $ 5,760     $ (7,792,290 )   $ 6,125,584  

 

Premium receipts in advance of the policy effective date are recorded as advance premiums.  The balance of advance premiums as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was approximately $1,263,000 and $776,000, respectively

 

Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expense (“LAE”) reserves:

    Nine months ended  
    September 30,  
    2014     2013  
             
Balance at beginning of period   $ 34,503,229     $ 30,485,532  
Less reinsurance recoverables     (17,363,975 )     (18,419,694 )
Net balance, beginning of period     17,139,254       12,065,838  
                 
Incurred related to:                
Current year     11,043,919       7,467,756  
Prior years     827,141       682,814  
Total incurred     11,871,060       8,150,570  
                 
Paid related to:                
Current year     4,725,526       2,458,940  
Prior years     4,834,120       3,498,333  
Total paid     9,559,646       5,957,273  
                 
Net balance at end of period     19,450,668       14,259,135  
Add reinsurance recoverables     17,471,621       15,257,918  
Balance at end of period   $ 36,922,289     $ 29,517,053  

 

Incurred losses and LAE are net of reinsurance recoveries under reinsurance contracts of $11,881,366 and $12,170,056 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

Prior year incurred loss and LAE development is based upon estimates by line of business and accident year. The Company’s management continually monitors claims activity to assess the appropriateness of carried case and incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) reserves, giving consideration to Company and industry trends.

 

The reserving process for loss adjustment expense reserves provides for the Company’s best estimate at a particular point in time of the ultimate unpaid cost of all losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred, including settlement and administration of losses, and is based on facts and circumstances then known and including losses that have been incurred but not yet been reported. The process includes using actuarial methodologies to assist in establishing these estimates, judgments relative to estimates of future claims severity and frequency, the length of time before losses will develop to their ultimate level and the possible changes in the law and other external factors that are often beyond the Company’s control.  Several actuarial reserving methodologies are used to estimate required loss reserves. The process produces carried reserves set by management based upon the actuaries’ best estimate and is the result of numerous best estimates made by line of business, accident year, and loss and loss adjustment expense. The amount of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves for reported claims (“case reserve”) is based primarily upon a case-by-case evaluation of coverage, liability, injury severity, and any other information considered pertinent to estimating the exposure presented by the claim. The amounts of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves for unreported claims and development on known claims (incurred but not reported reserves) are determined using historical information by line of insurance as adjusted to current conditions. Since this process produces loss reserves set by management based upon the actuaries’ best estimate, there is no explicit or implicit provision for uncertainty in the carried loss reserves.

 

Due to the inherent uncertainty associated with the reserving process, the ultimate liability may differ, perhaps substantially, from the original estimate. Such estimates are regularly reviewed and updated and any resulting adjustments are included in the current year’s results. Reserves are closely monitored and are recomputed periodically using the most recent information on reported claims and a variety of statistical techniques. On at least a quarterly basis, the Company reviews by line of business existing reserves, new claims, changes to existing case reserves and paid losses with respect to the current and prior years. Several methods are used, varying by product line and accident year, in order to select the estimated year-end loss reserves.  These methods include the following:

 

Paid Loss Development – historical patterns of paid loss development are used to project future paid loss emergence in order to estimate required reserves.

 

Incurred Loss Development – historical patterns of incurred loss development, reflecting both paid losses and changes in case reserves, are used to project future incurred loss emergence in order to estimate required reserves.

 

Paid Bornhuetter-Ferguson (“BF”) – an estimated loss ratio for a particular accident year is determined, and is weighted against the portion of the accident year claims that have been paid, based on historical paid loss development patterns.  The estimate of required reserves assumes that the remaining unpaid portion of a particular accident year will pay out at a rate consistent with the estimated loss ratio for that year.  This method can be useful for situations where an unusually high or low amount of paid losses exists at the early stages of the claims development process.
 

Incurred Bornhuetter-Ferguson (“BF”) - an estimated loss ratio for a particular accident year is determined, and is weighted against the portion of the accident year claims that have been reported, based on historical incurred loss development patterns.  The estimate of required reserves assumes that the remaining unreported portion of a particular accident year will pay out at a rate consistent with the estimated loss ratio for that year.  This method can be useful for situations where an unusually high or low amount of reported losses exists at the early stages of the claims development process.

 

Management’s best estimate of required reserves is generally based on an average of the methods above, with appropriate weighting of the various methods based on the line of business and accident year being projected. In some cases, additional methods or historical data from industry sources are employed to supplement the projections derived from the methods listed above.
 

Two key assumptions that materially affect the estimate of loss reserves are the loss ratio estimate for the current accident year used in the BF methods described above, and the loss development factor selections used in the loss development methods described above. The loss ratio estimates used in the BF methods are selected after reviewing historical accident year loss ratios adjusted for rate changes, trend, and mix of business.

 

The Company is not aware of any claims trends that have emerged or that would cause future adverse development that have not already been considered in existing case reserves and in its current loss development factors.

 

In New York State, lawsuits for negligence are subject to certain limitations and must be commenced within three years from the date of the accident or are otherwise barred. Accordingly, the Company’s exposure to ‘pure’ IBNR for accident years 2010 and prior is limited although there remains the possibility of adverse development on reported claims (‘case development’ IBNR).

 

The Company was previously a one-third participant in a pool arrangement. Effective November 1, 1997, the Company withdrew from its participation in the pool arrangement. Accordingly, the Company will only be participating in losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses that occurred prior to that date.

 

Reinsurance

 

The Company’s quota share reinsurance treaties in effect for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 for its Personal Lines business, which primarily consists of homeowners’ policies, were covered under the July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 and July 1, 2014/June 30, 2015 treaty years. The Company’s quota share reinsurance treaty in effect for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 for its Commercial Lines business was covered under the July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 treaty year. The Company did not renew its expiring Commercial Lines quota share reinsurance treaty on July 1, 2014.  The Company’s quota share reinsurance treaties in effect for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 for both its Personal Lines business and Commercial Lines business were covered under the July 1, 2012/June 30, 2013 and July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 treaty years. The Company’s personal lines quota share treaty that covered the July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 treaty year is a two year treaty expiring on June 30, 2015. Effective as of July 1, 2014, the Company had the option to increase the quota share percentage from 75% to a maximum of 85% or decrease the quota share percentage from 75% to a minimum of 55% by giving no less than 30 days advance notice. On May 12, 2014, the Company notified the personal lines reinsurers of its election to reduce the ceding percentage in the personal lines quota share treaty from 75% to 55% effective July 1, 2014. In addition to the change in the personal lines quota share treaty discussed above, the Company entered into new annual treaties with different terms effective July 1, 2014. The Company’s treaties for the July 1, 2012/June 30, 2013, July 1, 2013/ June 30, 2014 and July 1, 2014/June 30, 2015 treaty years provide for the following material terms:

 

 

    Treaty Year  
    July 1, 2014     July 1, 2013     July 1, 2012  
    to     to     to  
Line of Busines   June 30, 2015     June 30, 2014     June 30, 2013  
                   
Personal Lines:                  
Homeowners, dwelling fire and canine legal liability                  
Quota share treaty:                  
Percent ceded     55 %     75 %     75 %
Risk retained   $ 360,000     $ 300,000     $ 250,000  
Losses per occurrence subject to quota share reinsurance coverage   $ 800,000     $ 1,200,000     $ 1,000,000  
Excess of loss coverage above quota share coverage   $ 3,200,000     $ 1,700,000     $ 1,900,000  
    in excess of     in excess of     in excess of  
    $ 800,000     $ 1,200,000     $ 1,000,000  
Total reinsurance coverage per occurrence   $ 3,640,000     $ 2,600,000     $ 2,650,000  
Losses per occurrence subject to reinsurance coverage   $ 4,000,000     $ 2,900,000     $ 2,900,000  
Expiration date   June 30, 2015     June 30, 2015     June 30, 2013  
                         
Personal Umbrella                        
Quota share treaty:                        
Percent ceded - first million dollars of coverage     90 %     90 %     90 %
Percent ceded - excess of one million dollars of coverage     100 %     100 %     100 %
Total reinsurance coverage per occurrence   $ 2,900,000     $ 1,900,000     $ 1,900,000  
Losses per occurrence subject to quota share reinsurance coverage   $ 3,000,000     $ 2,000,000     $ 2,000,000  
Expiration date   June 30, 2015     June 30, 2014     June 30, 2013  
                         
Commercial Lines:                        
General liability commercial policies, except for commercial auto                        
Quota share treaty:                        
Percent ceded (terminated effective July 1, 2014)   None       25 %     40 %
Risk retained   $ 400,000     $ 300,000     $ 300,000  
Losses per occurrence subject to quota share reinsurance coverage   None     $ 400,000     $ 500,000  
Excess of loss coverage above quota share coverage   $ 3,600,000     $ 2,500,000     $ 2,400,000  
    in excess of     in excess of     in excess of  
    $ 400,000     $ 400,000     $ 500,000  
Total reinsurance coverage per occurrence   $ 3,600,000     $ 2,600,000     $ 2,600,000  
Losses per occurrence subject to reinsurance coverage   $ 4,000,000     $ 2,900,000     $ 2,900,000  
                         
Commercial Auto:                        
Excess of loss coverage in excess of risk retained   $ 1,700,000     $ 1,700,000     $ 1,750,000  
    in excess of     in excess of     in excess of  
    $ 300,000     $ 300,000     $ 250,000  
Catastrophe Reinsurance:                        
Initial loss subject to personal lines quota share treaty   $ 4,000,000     $ 4,000,000     $ 3,000,000  
Risk retained per catastrophe occurrence (1)   $ 1,800,000     $ 1,000,000     $ 750,000  
Catastrophe loss coverage in excess of quota share coverage (2) (3)   $ 137,000,000     $ 86,000,000     $ 70,000,000  

 

(1)   Plus losses in excess of catastrophe coverage.

 

(2)   Effective July 1, 2014, the Company’s catastrophe treaty also covers losses caused by severe winter weather during any consecutive 28 day period. Effective July 1, 2014, the duration of a catastrophe occurrence from windstorm, hail, tornado, hurricane and cyclone has been extended to 96 consecutive hours from 72 consecutive hours.

 

(3)   Catastrophe coverage is limited on an annual basis to two times the per occurrence amounts.

 

The single maximum risks per occurrence to which the Company is subject under the treaties that expired on June 30, 2014 and the new treaties effective July 1, 2014 are as follows:

 

     July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015    July 1, 2013 - June 30, 2014
 Treaty    Extent of Loss   Risk Retained    Extent of Loss   Risk Retained
Personal Lines    Initial $800,000   $360,000    Initial $1,200,000   $300,000
     $800,000 - $4,000,000    None(1)    $1,200,000 - $2,900,000    None(1)
     Over $4,000,000   100%    Over $2,900,000   100%
                 
Personal Umbrella    Initial $1,000,000   $100,000    Initial $1,000,000   $100,000
     $1,000,000 - $3,000,000    None(1)    $1,000,000 - $2,000,000    None(1)
     Over $3,000,000   100%    Over $2,000,000   100%
                 
Commercial Lines    Initial $400,000   $400,000    Initial $400,000   $300,000
     $400,000 - $4,000,000   None(1)    $400,000 - $2,900,000   None(1)
     Over $4,000,000   100%    Over $2,900,000   100%
                 
Commercial Auto    Initial $300,000   $300,000    Initial $300,000   $300,000
     $300,000 - $2,000,000    None(1)    $300,000 - $2,000,000    None(1)
     Over $2,000,000   100%    Over $2,000,000   100%
                 
Catastrophe (2)    Initial $4,000,000   $1,800,000    Initial $4,000,000   $1,000,000
     $4,000,000 - $141,000,000    None    $4,000,000 - $90,000,000    None
     Over $141,000,000   100%    Over $90,000,000   100%

 

________________

 

(1)   Covered by excess of loss treaties.

 

(2)   Catastrophe coverage is limited on an annual basis to two times the per occurrence amounts.

 

The Company’s reinsurance program is structured to enable the Company to significantly grow its premium volume while maintaining regulatory capital and other financial ratios generally within or below the expected ranges used for regulatory oversight purposes. The reinsurance program also provides income as a result of ceding commissions earned pursuant to the quota share reinsurance contracts. The Company’s participation in reinsurance arrangements does not relieve the Company of its obligations to policyholders.

 

Ceding Commission Revenue

 

The Company earns ceding commission revenue under its quota share reinsurance agreements based on: (i) a fixed provisional commission rate at which provisional ceding commissions are earned, and (ii) a sliding scale of commission rates and ultimate treaty year loss ratios on the policies reinsured under each of these agreements based upon which contingent ceding commissions are earned. The sliding scale includes minimum and maximum commission rates in relation to specified ultimate loss ratios.  The commission rate and contingent ceding commissions earned increases when the estimated ultimate loss ratio decreases and, conversely, the commission rate and contingent ceding commissions earned decreases when the estimated ultimate loss ratio increases.

 

The Company’s estimated ultimate treaty year loss ratios for treaties in effect for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2014 are attributable to contracts for the July 1, 2014/June 30, 2015 treaty year (“2014/2015 Treaties”) and the July 1, 2013/June 30, 2014 treaty year (“2013/2014 Treaties”). The Company’s estimated ultimate treaty year loss ratios for treaties in effect for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2013 are attributable to contracts for the July 1, 2012/June 30, 2013 treaty year (“2012/2013 Treaties”) and the 2013/2014 Treaties.

  

Treaties in effect for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2014

 

The Company’s estimated ultimate loss ratios (“Loss Ratios”) for the period July 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014, which are attributable to contracts for the 2014/2015 Treaties were lower than the contractual Loss Ratios at which the provisional ceding commissions are earned. Accordingly, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded contingent ceding commission earned with respect to the 2014/2015 Treaties.

 

The Company’s estimated ultimate Loss Ratios for the period January 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014 attributable to contracts for the 2013/2014 Treaties were lower than the contractual Loss Ratios at which the provisional ceding commissions are earned. Accordingly, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded contingent ceding commission earned with respect to the 2013/2014 Treaties.

 

Treaties in effect for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2013

 

The Company’s estimated ultimate Loss Ratios for the period July 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013, which are attributable to contracts for the 2013/2014 Treaties, were lower than the contractual Loss Ratios at which the provisional ceding commissions were earned. Accordingly, for the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company’s recorded contingent ceding commission earned with respect to the 2013/2014 Treaties.

 

The Company’s estimated ultimate Loss Ratios for the period January 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013 attributable to contracts for the 2012/2013 Treaties were greater than the contractual Loss Ratios at which the provisional ceding commissions were earned. Accordingly, for the nine months September 30, 2013, the Company recorded negative contingent ceding commissions earned with respect to the 2012/2013 Treaties.

 

In addition to the treaties that were in effect for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the estimated ultimate loss ratios from prior years’ treaties are subject to change as loss reserves from those periods increase or decrease, resulting in an increase or decrease in the commission rate and contingent ceding commissions earned.

 

Ceding commissions earned consists of the following:

 

    Three months ended     Nine months ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2014     2013     2014     2013  
                         
Provisional ceding commissions earned   $ 2,653,690     $ 2,940,661     $ 9,660,437     $ 7,836,370  
Contingent ceding commissions earned     624,629       670,883       705,214       403,316  
    $ 3,278,319     $ 3,611,544     $ 10,365,651     $ 8,239,686  

 

Provisional ceding commissions are settled monthly. Balances due from reinsurers for contingent ceding commissions on quota share treaties are settled annually based on the loss ratio of each treaty year that ends on June 30. As discussed above, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded negative contingent ceding commissions earned with respect to the 2012/2013 Treaties, which resulted in ceding commissions payable to reinsurers. There was no net contingent ceding commissions payable to reinsurers as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.