XML 39 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Oct. 25, 2013
Commitments and Contingencies

NOTE 11:  Commitments and Contingencies

Rental expense for operating leases for engineering, selling, administrative and manufacturing totaled $17,996,000, $17,603,000 and $14,208,000 in fiscal years 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

 

At October 25, 2013, the Company’s rental commitments for noncancelable operating leases with a duration in excess of one year were as follows:

In Thousands

 

Fiscal Year

  

2014

   $       14,973   

2015

     9,993   

2016

     7,981   

2017

     7,205   

2018

     6,337   

2019 and thereafter

     18,349   

 

 
   $ 64,838   

 

 

The Company is subject to purchase obligations for goods and services. The purchase obligations include amounts under legally enforceable agreements for goods and services with defined terms as to quantity, price and timing of delivery. As of October 25, 2013, the Company’s purchase obligations were as follows:

 

In Thousands                                   
     Total      Less than
1 year
    

1-3

years

    

4-5

years

     After 5
years
 

Purchase obligations

   $       688,546       $       630,524       $         52,131       $         5,412       $             479   

The Company is subject to U.S. export laws and regulations, including the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), that generally restricts the export of defense products, technical data, and defense services. The Company filed voluntary disclosure reports concerning certain technical and administrative violations of the ITAR with the U.S. Department of State’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance (DDTC Office of Compliance). To address these problems, the Company has made a number of investments in its export compliance functions, including: additional staffing, ongoing implementation of a new software system, employee training, and establishment of a regular compliance audit program and corrective action process. The DDTC Office of Compliance acknowledged the Company’s progress and continuing improvements, but nevertheless informed the Company that it intends to impose civil monetary fines and administrative sanctions based on the information it had concerning the Company’s earlier history in handling ITAR-controlled transactions, including the substance of its prior voluntary disclosures and other aspects of ITAR compliance errors. Management has been in discussions with the agency and provided supplemental information with the intent of reaching a settlement. On August 15, 2013, the DDTC Office of Compliance proposed a total penalty of $20 million, with $10 million suspended and eligible for offset credit based on verified expenditures for past and future remedial compliance measures. Based on this proposal, the Company estimated and recorded a $10 million charge in fiscal 2013. Management has continued discussions with the DDTC Office of Compliance on final settlement terms, and the final settlement is subject to approval by the agency.

The Company is a party to various lawsuits and claims, both as plaintiff and defendant, and has contingent liabilities arising from the conduct of business, none of which, in the opinion of management, is expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. The Company believes that it has made appropriate and adequate provisions for contingent liabilities.

Prior to the March 2007 acquisition of CMC, CMC was involved in a transaction in which CMC shareholders had a limited amount of time in which to tender their shares in exchange for cash. In May 2008, after the prescribed time period had expired, CAD $11.8 million remained unclaimed. As a result, the paying agent returned the unclaimed amount to CMC in accordance with Canadian law. In December 2008, CMC’s former parent company instituted a legal action against the paying agent, alleging negligence and breached contract terms by returning the funds to CMC. The plaintiff lost at trial and appealed. In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, CMC received notice that the plaintiff abandoned its appeal. In addition, CMC and the paying agent settled all remaining issues. All contingencies relating to this matter were resolved, and accordingly, the Company recorded a gain of approximately CAD $11.8 million or $11.9 million or $9.5 million after tax, in the second fiscal quarter of 2012.

Approximately 601 U.S.-based employees or 12% of total U.S.-based employees were represented by various labor unions. The Company’s European operations are subject to national trade union agreements and to local regulations governing employment.